How Kilonovas Made the Earth and Killed Alternate Gravity - Ask a Spaceman!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ค. 2024
  • Full podcast episodes: www.askaspaceman.com
    Support: / pmsutter
    Follow: / paulmattsutter and / paulmattsutter
    Part 2 of 2! How did the observation of a kilonova change astronomy? How did that one observation kill off alternate models of gravity? What’s in store for the future of gravitational waves? I discuss these questions and more in today’s Ask a Spaceman!
    Follow all the show updates at www.askaspaceman.com, and help support the show at / pmsutter !
    Keep those questions about space, science, astronomy, astrophysics, and cosmology coming to #AskASpaceman for COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE OF TIME AND SPACE! Music by Jason Grady and Nick Bain.
    Chapters:
    00:00 One Afternoon in 2017
    04:11 What is a Kilonova
    09:23 What Happens During a Kilonova Explosion
    14:40 How One Measurement Killed Alternate Gravity
    15:50 The Future of Multi-Messenger Astronomy
    Video credits: NASA, ESA, Planck, WMAP, Illustris
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 421

  • @ChaosAttractor13
    @ChaosAttractor13 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    My girlfriend in college signed up to take Astronomy for a semester. She wanted to learn how to tell fortunes. I had a very difficult time explaining why Astrology and Astronomy are not the same thing. Her argument was they both study stars. I gave up. Two years later, she is on the Deans list and made A’s in both the Astronomy classes she took. I had flunked out because I can’t do math. I don’t belong in this world. 😭😭😭😭😭

  • @ryleexiii1252
    @ryleexiii1252 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    > “It’s not gonna be pretty”
    > Immediately shows an absolutely beautiful animation of a kilonova

  • @michaelzumpano7318
    @michaelzumpano7318 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    You’re an excellent speaker and teacher. This is the first time I’ve received a youtube recommendation for your channel. Subscribed!

    • @murraynickel6377
      @murraynickel6377 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Same for me. Thankyou Paul, that was a fascinating and clear video.

    • @lugyd1xdone195
      @lugyd1xdone195 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same

    • @godagarah-kf1vk
      @godagarah-kf1vk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      same for me as well very educational

    • @0neIntangible
      @0neIntangible 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As a recently new subscriber, I love his knowledge and passion for these interesting topics.

  • @okd521
    @okd521 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    When I hear about killanovas I always think about the lesser-known Godzillanovas, that can only be seen from Japan

    • @olecranonrebellion9976
      @olecranonrebellion9976 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Someone once found a kilo of cocaine in the Dash of a 73 ss Nova

    • @okd521
      @okd521 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@olecranonrebellion9976 I once found an ounce of cocaine. Since I'm virtually immune to it it didn't do shit for me

    • @josephjohnson3738
      @josephjohnson3738 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Just as likely to exist too.

    • @roseCatcher_
      @roseCatcher_ ปีที่แล้ว +10

      They can actually be observed using the LIGMA observatories situated at Nintendo headquarters.

    • @Dice-Z
      @Dice-Z ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@roseCatcher_ Ligma double colliding neutron stars.

  • @lastsilhouette85
    @lastsilhouette85 2 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    and omg....dude, the universe just looked at our new theories and was just like "hah, nope!" Dozens of theories just all died in one fell swoop! That's intense.

    • @bgbraker
      @bgbraker ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Where should we be mining this gold?

    • @Chrisdemartell
      @Chrisdemartell ปีที่แล้ว

      ​❤❤❤😊😊😊😊😊
      .... . .....
      P
      Pl.... .

    • @wayneyadams
      @wayneyadams ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When you say "The Universe" I assume you mean God, because the Universe has no consciousness.

    • @Sonny_McMacsson
      @Sonny_McMacsson ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@wayneyadams Wrong

    • @wayneyadams
      @wayneyadams ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Sonny_McMacsson I yield! The supreme authority on everything in the universe has made his declaration, I am wrong! So you as the final arbiter of everything is saying the universe is conscious.

  • @tombock336
    @tombock336 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    The fact that this is what goes on in the universe we live in. 🤯. Incredible.

    • @Whiteshoelace
      @Whiteshoelace 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Incredible compared to what?

    • @weluvmike
      @weluvmike 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      100!! Simply Astounding; *Compared to The Mundane!!

    • @kereiltutt5769
      @kereiltutt5769 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Whiteshoelace events like this dont really have to compare to anything...they are pretty incredible in their own right

    • @InfamousX1000
      @InfamousX1000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Whiteshoelace compared to what we used to think about the universe basically. The concept of dead matter is often used to describe matter in the sense that it is simply a material object that exists in space posing no will of its own, yet we keep discovering these amazing things that it can do. I know, technically matter shows no will of it’s own, but from everything I’ve learned about matter is that it is definitely not dead. Our understanding of our universe keeps expanding with each generation, what we know now might not even be the most amazing thing the next generation knows.

    • @joselucnico
      @joselucnico ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes and in the same time, missiles fall on Ukraine, incredible.

  • @georgetate6055
    @georgetate6055 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I've just finished watching . . . what a great video! Something I somehow missed is the 2017 Kilonova! How could I have missed this huge event?
    Thank you!

  • @Tread69
    @Tread69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Keep it up Paul, you make what I’ve always found interesting, even more so.

  • @larryyoung5757
    @larryyoung5757 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    How incredibly interesting and insightful. It makes one humble to appreciate even a small aspect of the universe so long ago.

  • @goncalocarvalho4917
    @goncalocarvalho4917 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Very good video,. Great communicator indeed, explaining complex stuff with humor and accessibility, well done

  • @tracytomlinson2888
    @tracytomlinson2888 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That explanation was so illuminating. Thanks for making it palatable for someone who loves this subject with very little knowledge of physics.

  • @markusmencke8059
    @markusmencke8059 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    13:40 the gamma should be later by tangling with matter, not faster?

    • @chaz693
      @chaz693 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I think that was a slip up. Earlier in the video he said the opposite. He's an excellent communicator otherwise.

  • @AlienRelics
    @AlienRelics ปีที่แล้ว +4

    5:47 If the gravity were so strong that light could orbit, it would be a black hole, not a neutron star.

    • @dankoppel6271
      @dankoppel6271 หลายเดือนก่อน

      For a black hole, light orbits at 1.5 times the Schwarzschild radius while typical neutron star radii are 3 times the Schwarzschild radius so yes that seems right. By the way, the light orbits around a BH are not stable so they only have somewhat academic existence.

  • @bernardputersznit64
    @bernardputersznit64 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    GREAT WORK THIS - PLEASE DO KEEP IT UP

  • @mistyjohnson4794
    @mistyjohnson4794 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much for your expert explanations. I love how you bring with your personality and make it more fun and interesting especially your sense of humor! And I love the word, modern day, slang, urban dictionary, definitions you give! Instead of all the textbook craziness that science gives! Never stop being you !! You bring fun and life to the story! Thank you

  • @dragonrabbit7410
    @dragonrabbit7410 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great telling of a significant scientific event! somehow i either missed hearing about it or had forgotten about reading it in a headline. very informative!

  • @goemboeck
    @goemboeck ปีที่แล้ว

    A great passionate presentation, thank you!

  • @ballBozeman
    @ballBozeman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks. I learned so much.

  • @robertcongdon6296
    @robertcongdon6296 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    A truly informative and excellent episode Paul !

    • @squirlmy
      @squirlmy ปีที่แล้ว

      truly a work of slack?

  • @richardhoover4471
    @richardhoover4471 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow! Just wow!! So glad I live in this universe!

  • @daffidavit
    @daffidavit ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent presentation. Thank you, professor.

  • @davecurtis8833
    @davecurtis8833 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video Paul

  • @granadosvm
    @granadosvm ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video!
    Informative, provides all kind of reviewable sources, so anyone with more interest can dive deeper. 👍
    Gained a subscriber.

  • @willinwoods
    @willinwoods 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great vid, thanks!

  • @FaxanaduJohn
    @FaxanaduJohn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Deserves way more subs!

  • @MIN0RITY-REP0RT
    @MIN0RITY-REP0RT ปีที่แล้ว +5

    More good information here, less hiding behind "Relativity this or that", and someone actually being able to say upfront they don't know what "dark energy" is.

  • @johnkufeldt3564
    @johnkufeldt3564 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for educating me, Liked and subbed. Cheers from Calgary. It only took me 6 years to find out that a once in a 100000 year event happened during my ever so brief blip of time we all spend together on our little blue marble.

  • @wicked1172
    @wicked1172 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the intellectual stimulation, kudos !

  • @cheekiblin690
    @cheekiblin690 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    A little long but still a great video! Gravitational waves sound so amazing and so terrifying at the same time!

    • @melissagrosse1185
      @melissagrosse1185 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😂😂😂 long....

    • @Yabberfrat
      @Yabberfrat ปีที่แล้ว

      140 years long!!!
      [I thought the length was perfect]

  • @JessieJussMessy
    @JessieJussMessy ปีที่แล้ว

    Spectacular presentation of a spectacular event

  • @richardknott2021
    @richardknott2021 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent presentation..

  • @dark808bb8
    @dark808bb8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    amazing stuff!

  • @yolyrom7233
    @yolyrom7233 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent info

  • @aforementioned7177
    @aforementioned7177 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Absolutely, mind bogglingly amazing.

  •  2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Thanks

  • @MelvinCruz
    @MelvinCruz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A few days prior to watching this video a friend of mine that is history professor tells me she don't watch TH-cam videos because that are not a scientific paper...so bad for her because a paper never will explain in few words how really something affects scientific knowledge that includes the study of history. Thanks for this fantastic video.

  • @jamesharmer9293
    @jamesharmer9293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Just saw one of Paul's videos from back in 2017 and I'm so glad to see how much healthier he looks in this video. I don't know whether it was a severe attack of jaundice or just a dodgy video camera, but it's nice to see that he's not about to drop dead from liver failure.

    • @FaxanaduJohn
      @FaxanaduJohn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I’ve been watching Sutter for at least that long and that’s definitely a bit over the top.

  • @kurthanson4106
    @kurthanson4106 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm picking up on your passion... and I like it.

  • @rolie9403
    @rolie9403 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The fake typing at 0:36 kills me 😂

  • @dalelerette206
    @dalelerette206 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    August 2017 something big happened. This 'gravitational wave' was significantly longer.
    It is interesting to note: The solar eclipse of August 21, 2017, dubbed the "Great American Eclipse" by some media, was a total solar eclipse visible within a band that spanned the contiguous United States from the Pacific to the Atlantic coasts. It was also visible as a partial solar eclipse from as far north as Nunavut in northern Canada to as far south as northern South America. In northwestern Europe and Africa, it was partially visible in the late evening. In northeastern Asia, it was partially visible at sunrise.

  • @Mr.Nichan
    @Mr.Nichan ปีที่แล้ว +1

    13:40 If the gamma rays and the gravitational rays were emited at the same time, and the gamma rays got blocked or deflected more than the gravitational waves, then the gravitational waves would arrive first. Thus, your explanation makes it sound like it IS surprising that the gamma rays arrived first. This problem is easily solved if we just assume that they were emitted first, though.

  • @MonsterSound
    @MonsterSound 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I felt that bro. Take care and thanks. 😎👍

  • @shadowpoet4398
    @shadowpoet4398 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I've been obsessed with exotic quasars forever... This is one of the most exciting things I've ever heard. Thank you Mr. Einstein, for making your own observation and giving these fine young people a target to reach. The truest words a scientist can utter are "I hope you can prove me wrong."

    • @wayneyadams
      @wayneyadams ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My graduate research in the 1980s was on quasars back when we did not know what they were.

    • @smo-king6504
      @smo-king6504 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wayneyadams tell us more please!

    • @AdrianMartan
      @AdrianMartan ปีที่แล้ว

      @@smo-king6504 There's no universe as they want us to believe.
      Heliocentric model theory is a fairy tale for adults.

  • @markkrill
    @markkrill ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation of killonovas

  • @user-yz5em8xr1h
    @user-yz5em8xr1h ปีที่แล้ว

    Exciting stuff! It fills one of the multitude of gaps in our understanding of our Universe!

  • @markscheinfeld3020
    @markscheinfeld3020 ปีที่แล้ว

    New to channel...subscribed.

  • @johnh539
    @johnh539 ปีที่แล้ว

    beautifully explained.

  • @mikolajtrzeciecki1188
    @mikolajtrzeciecki1188 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am very happy that Heavy Metal creation resonates so positively in Space, and has been doing so at least for 140 mln yrs.

  • @nettewilson5926
    @nettewilson5926 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So cool to learn how heavier elements are created and that they are not created in supernovas (which I think I had learned at this be point)! But how can you say a kilo nova is not as powerful as a supernova since it creates such large gravitational waves?

  • @sirfer6969
    @sirfer6969 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    5 min in, instant like and subscription

  • @thetruthexperiment
    @thetruthexperiment ปีที่แล้ว

    Considering these extremely isolated and sensitive detectors haven’t been around for very long should be good enough to assume that these signals aren’t a huge fish every single time. I love that you said “routine black hole collisions.”

  • @AsteroSSB
    @AsteroSSB ปีที่แล้ว

    This is now my favourite video to send to people that often ask me: Hey Badonk, how is it that we are made of stardust?

  • @wayneyadams
    @wayneyadams ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The universe is absolutely incredible. I am still in awe of what goes on. We know so much more than we did when I was in graduate school in the 1980s. Heck, we were still not sure what quasars were. My professor was still doing research on quasars. Now, a mere 40 years or so later, not only have we solved that problem, but have gotten to the stage where we can detect gravitational waves and identify the event from which they emanated.

    • @chrismay25
      @chrismay25 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whats even funnier is what we “thought” a year ago has already changed haha. Hence “science” what we really do not know but what we think until proven wrong lmfao

  • @montanateri6889
    @montanateri6889 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Wow, this was utterly facinating! You are so clear, so understandable for a layman, (why 'layman"? I'm a lay-grandma😀 ) This ties so much knowlege to a single event, and of course (!) there are emails flying when something is observed, no longer is cosmic events something that people find out about years later, this is shared in a second flat, a "hey, turn your telescope to x spot in the sky!" what a wonderous time of expanding knowledge we are all in!
    You popped up in my youtube vids list, and what a find you are! I've subscribed and will flip backwards to watch prior vids and that is exciting to me!

    • @FatT45
      @FatT45 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Revelations tells us that in the last days knowledge will be increased and people will move to and fro across the Earth! May all come to the glory of Jesus so that all heads are bowed and knees bent! God bless you

    • @Scapestoat
      @Scapestoat ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FatT45 There's a cool science grandma geeking out, and your first thought was "I should spout some vague pointless religion at her"?
      Jesus would be disappointed in you.

  • @anirudhadhote
    @anirudhadhote ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good 👍🏼

  • @XRP747E
    @XRP747E ปีที่แล้ว

    That was a really stimulating video! Thank you - a year late.

  • @troybradshaw8781
    @troybradshaw8781 ปีที่แล้ว

    You get the same effect if something hits our gravity well too hard and fast. It can be mistaken because of the heat flash. I've always been interested in neutron stars. They are estimated to shrink until a thimble full would weigh as much as a aircraft carrier. 82,000 tons. It's mind blowing.

  • @stevenpilling5318
    @stevenpilling5318 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I had no idea that LIGO's kilonova event was of such importance!

  • @jamesshevnin981
    @jamesshevnin981 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is there any way to learn what applications & renderers were used to create this amazing imagery?

  • @TerryBollinger
    @TerryBollinger ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice analysis. Also, I learned that the official name for heavy-element generating neutron star collisions is "kilonova."

  • @BIG-DIPPER-56
    @BIG-DIPPER-56 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very Good - Thank You ! ! !
    🙂😎👍

  • @MrJdsenior
    @MrJdsenior ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's amazing. The detection and publications, as well. I can't even get my head around things bending spacetime to send out waves detectable from HUMONGOUS distances. And I used to think Supernovae were spectacular.
    So from what you said, I'm assuming that gravitational lensing would not work on gravity waves the way it does on light? My other thought was, "And poof, there goes many theoretical physicists work, up in smoke in an instant". If so, ouch.

    • @manhandler
      @manhandler ปีที่แล้ว

      Wouldn't gravitational waves cause lensing? And by extension time distortion would keep them moving forever while expanding. Truly amazing time we live in.

  • @sidviscous5959
    @sidviscous5959 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But I thought Einstein maintained that gravity was an artifact of curved space-time. If gravity is instead a wave, then what energy is carried by this wave and how does it interact with matter? If gravity waves exist, shouldn't we be able to create a "tractor beam" like they had on Star Trek? And ultimately shouldn't we be able to create antigravity devices? And since time and space are the same thing, according to Einstein, if we can control gravity, shouldn't we be able to create a "time machine"? Enquiring minds want to know.

    • @nutbunny10
      @nutbunny10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The wave is an oscillation of space-time & so it's a periodic bending of space-time which introduces the gravity.

  • @QuartuvLarry
    @QuartuvLarry ปีที่แล้ว

    Made in 2021. Got a HUGE gamma ray burst this last October. Came from over 2 billion light years distant, but was still strong enough to make our atmosphere expand for about 2 hours

  • @shaqilleraneldojacobs1275
    @shaqilleraneldojacobs1275 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is 4real mind boggling 🤯

  • @Shinobubu
    @Shinobubu ปีที่แล้ว

    that 1.3 second delay is easily explained as small lag in our instrumentation and synchronization.

  • @Wise4HarvestTime
    @Wise4HarvestTime ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing 🤩

  • @justaguy4real
    @justaguy4real ปีที่แล้ว

    17:20 great that they selflessly work together for the greatest good now instead of trying to seriously compete for credit.

  • @wknajafi
    @wknajafi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you

  • @kaia.giermann5239
    @kaia.giermann5239 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    dr. paul m.sutter: At 13:45 - I don't understand why the gamma rays arrived first if they interact more with the environment (and of course the impact came first, that makes the grav waves and then the explosion making the emp) or is it just mixed up in the explanation or did I got something wrong as a non native speaker?

  • @Cliff.Hanger
    @Cliff.Hanger ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Paul, can you please clarify. You said something twice which appears to me to be contradictory. You said that the gravitational waves are launched first and the gamma are held up a while. Yes, I believe that is the case. But you also said that the gamma rays were detected 1.3 seconds before the gravitational waves (time stamp 13:50). Did you mean the gravitational waves appear first then the gamma rays arrive 1.3 seconds after?

  • @BenjaminOwenSlattery
    @BenjaminOwenSlattery ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow, kilanovas are a goldmine!

  • @mayerkorchin-vv9vt
    @mayerkorchin-vv9vt ปีที่แล้ว

    I have never heard of this before.

  • @seankelly1291
    @seankelly1291 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ok. I'll apologize in advance. But I need you to clarify something, please. In your words, "the gamma ray radiation (the light/emr) got 'tangled up' in (the debri field of the explosion), in the gravity waves, and the gravitational waves "sailed right through." So how does that make the gravitational waves faster than the gamma waves?
    Thank you for clarifying. Love the video. Especially about how kilonovas are necessary for heavier elements.

  • @chriscordray8572
    @chriscordray8572 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I always believe we started in a nova, not in condensed materials. A Super Nova explosion would create all the materials in milliseconds. Imagine 2 sun's collide.

  • @onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475
    @onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    13:50 You messed-up there.
    Gamma rays (γ-ray) are light, which interact with EM, so would be the ones to get tangled-up, and should arrive _AFTER_ gravitational waves (by your explanation). Pin a correction perhaps, with a new explanation? 📌

  • @seankelly1291
    @seankelly1291 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    140million years ago!!!!!!! That distance is mind blowing.

  • @matgeezer2094
    @matgeezer2094 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really interesting video. Just wondered - how well can 3 gravitational wave detectors narrow down the search area? Also, does a kilonova send out a burst of neutrinos? Were an excess of neutrinos observed?

  • @stevoplex
    @stevoplex ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow! I remember that, I awoke from fitful sleep that morning as if my brother slapped the top of my head with a warm, fairly dense pancake. Except there was no pancake. And my brother, a geophysicist was in Switzerland. I called him later, asking if he had been playing "spooky action at a distance " with me. Nope. So today, I found out what it may have been, though I had no clue beforehand. Science is cool.

  • @DesereckC
    @DesereckC ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s hilarious how people can talk about conspiracy theories with the same conviction and seriousness as this guy talking about literal facts of science.

  • @dichebach
    @dichebach ปีที่แล้ว

    Kilonovae are considered a promising mechanism for explaining the apparent "over-abundance" of heavy elements in the universe, particularly those beyond iron. That much is absolutely true, and the observations of kilonova event in 2017 (GW170817) provided strong support for the role of kilonovae in the production of heavy elements. However, I don't quite follow the argument that proof that gravity waves travel at the speed of light has "effectively killed almost every extension to general relativity . . . all theories of modified gravity . . . cooked up to explain dark energy." Perhaps he was referring to other models, but as far as I know those observations that gravitational waves travel at the speed of light are generally consistent with extensions to general relativity that aim to provide alternative explanations for dark energy.
    Scalar field models, modified gravity theories, and the Chaplygin gas model, among others, are constructed in a way that preserves the fundamental principles of relativity, including the speed limit of causality set by the speed of light. These theories do not violate the observed speed of gravitational waves.

  • @zanebertoli4589
    @zanebertoli4589 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At 14 min you say the light (gamma rays) arrived first, and then say this is because they got tangled up in the nova mess, whereas the gravity waves didn't have this issue. This is not right, the GW reached us first, followed by the gamma. You said it backwards.

  • @space_artist_4real138
    @space_artist_4real138 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If light can orbit a neutron star, doesn't that mean that to escape this orbit an object needs to exceed the speed of light? Meaning this is a black hole? Or could it be an elliptical orbit and it is possible to escape and there's something I'm not understanding?

  • @pittyman
    @pittyman ปีที่แล้ว

    We are now waiting for observing by one of these & meganova, giganova and teranova...😎

  • @Dave2170
    @Dave2170 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stretched that out over 18 minutes.

  • @manhandler
    @manhandler ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wouldn't uranium be a heavier element than iron? And wouldn't a netron star be more likely to condense uranium than iron?

  • @nobiggeridiot
    @nobiggeridiot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Side question, is it possible to image a neutron star in visible optical spectrum ?

    • @chaz693
      @chaz693 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah they have been observing pulsars for a really long time

  • @nathanielacton3768
    @nathanielacton3768 ปีที่แล้ว

    What boggles my mind about relying on events like Kilanova to make 'mundane' stable metals like gold\silver\etc on earth is that we know that it didn't land here late, it was scattered around in the formative solar system epoch. Now, 13.7b - 4.5b gives the universe only 9.2b years for generations of stellar objects to be formed, collapsed, die and explode to get the variety of stars we see today. Most main sequence stars we can see have a lifespan longer than the universes current age excluding them from the recycling process that produces heavy elements.
    This implies that things like kilanova, which are now considered super rare would had to have been extremely common earlier in the universe, else the clouds of heavy element slurry that forms all the observable star system we see today would not have captured anything other than basic H from the BB.
    The early universe had to have been like popping candy. Main sequence stars were either excluded from formation, eaten based on tight packing, or would have been bombarded constantly with a slurry of heavies, which should be detectable today...

  • @davidchurch3472
    @davidchurch3472 ปีที่แล้ว

    What radioactive elements were left in the kilonova you collected, after all the atoms had been squished until ALL their protons and electrons became neutrons?

  • @nektu5435
    @nektu5435 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Who cares about Lithium? Nirvana. Nirvana cares. I like it. I'm not gonna crack.

    • @dextermorgan1
      @dextermorgan1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I know a few manic depressives who kind of depend on it too. 🤷🏻

    • @TwinPhoenix666
      @TwinPhoenix666 ปีที่แล้ว

      Evanescence. Don't wanna forget how it feels without lithium.

    • @chiragpurohit3657
      @chiragpurohit3657 ปีที่แล้ว

    • @daMillenialTrucker
      @daMillenialTrucker ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm glad I depend on Jesus for my source of happiness

  • @marknovak6498
    @marknovak6498 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good Commentary. My only question is perhaps the far more massive population-three stars might still need to be studied as a source.

  • @dclem005
    @dclem005 ปีที่แล้ว

    I misread the title of this video to be "How Kilonovas made the Earth and killed Anti-Gravity". Needless to say I was a little disappointed to find out that Kilonovas only killed Alternate Gravity and not Anti-Gravity.

  • @andrel8243
    @andrel8243 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great

  • @aforementioned7177
    @aforementioned7177 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    3 questions though. Where is the BH or Neutron Star that's left over from the Kilonova that created the stuff our solar system is made of? Should it not be relatively close to us, a few light years away? Can we detect it in some way?

  • @wayneyadams
    @wayneyadams ปีที่แล้ว +1

    13:58 What?! If the gravitational waves came straight out while the gamma rays were delayed, shouldn't the gamma ray have arrived AFTER the gravitational waves, not before?
    14:13 1.3 seconds in 140 million years would be well within experimental error. It is 2.9 parts in 10^15 (2,9 parts in a million billion, or 3 pennies in ten trillion dollars). I don't think there are any experiments ever done in the whole history of Physics and Chemistry that had that kind of precision.

  • @thetruthexperiment
    @thetruthexperiment ปีที่แล้ว

    The fact that we have gold on our planet suggests that in the early universe, nova were in abundance. Imagine the quantities of island of stability products near a quasar. Or whatever

  • @ChelimYrneh
    @ChelimYrneh ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting ! But you inverted the arrival times of gamma-rays & ‘gravitational waves’ ~ you said the light ( I.e. gamma-rays ) got “tangled up” momentarily with matter on it’s way out, hence slightly delayed, whilst ‘gravitational waves’ were not affected by such delaying interactions - yet your premise is that the gamma-rays arrived FIRST !!

  • @infinitemonkey917
    @infinitemonkey917 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What happens after 2 neutron stars collide ? Do you have 1 big one or maybe a black hole ?

  • @alnilam2151
    @alnilam2151 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Were there many unknown\yet2be identified elements observed within said kilonovas' spectrum bandwidth? Or, is that even possible Paul unidentified observations or justanother sillyquestion? Thanks❣🔭👀

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior ปีที่แล้ว

      Had the same thought. I don't know how you would even detect them, though, given that they might be stable for microseconds or nanoseconds.

    • @neilreynolds3858
      @neilreynolds3858 ปีที่แล้ว

      That sounds like a very good question to me. If there is a zone of stability out beyond the mass number of what we know is stable, would we be able to detect it in a kilonova exposition?

  • @Aussie23456
    @Aussie23456 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do the gravitational waves travell,at the speed of light186,000 miles per second. or how is the gravitational wave senced so quickly being at a large distance from that which senced the gravitational
    wave showing something of a simarity to earthly ,seismic waves ,showing the start and increase and fall of the magnitude of seismic waves
    as an earthquake signified a tearing in or under or over a fault within a tectonic plate