ALL Nuclear Physics Explained SIMPLY

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @bhgtree
    @bhgtree ปีที่แล้ว +99

    Arvin is a brilliant teacher, we need more like him to teach and explain mathematics, science and engineering, with the hope the many young (and not so young) decide to study these subjects.
    Thank you, Sir.

    • @johannzdebor5615
      @johannzdebor5615 ปีที่แล้ว

      My revolution in physics has been irrefutably valid for 28 years. Light years and the big bang never happened. We live in the parallel universe. Explorers of extraterrestrials and contact holders of star spaceships since 01/17/95. Johann Zdebor

    • @Kenny_cuh
      @Kenny_cuh ปีที่แล้ว

      im the outlier bruh im 13

  • @douglasboyle6544
    @douglasboyle6544 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    I've known all of these things since I was in high school essentially (thirty years ago) but I still watch channels like yours because I can still always learn something or get some nuance. And this time was no different, I never completely grasped why the Strong force is eventually overcome in large nuclei by the EM force, I never caught on to the additive effect of the repulsion of the EM charge of the protons. Once again, you've taught me something and made it very much worth my while to tune in, thanks :)

  • @zack_120
    @zack_120 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    6:35 - for easier memory, alpha particles/decay are emissions of helium nuclei, beta particles are electrons released from neutron decay into protons, and gamma particles are mass-less, high energy photons.

  • @PMA65537
    @PMA65537 ปีที่แล้ว +205

    I spent 7 years in the nuclear industry and it doesn't make parties interesting. It just means people who think they know more than you try to convince you your safety work is all mistaken. And that's after a week of work when you want some time off.

    • @hisss
      @hisss ปีที่แล้ว +50

      _Obviously_ a layman who's watched a TH-cam vid or two knows more than you, silly professional!
      I work in IT. I feel your pain.

    • @AnthonyGoodley
      @AnthonyGoodley ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Many people are intimidated by someone who is much smarter than they are when it is made obvious.
      I suspect that it's an ego thing.

    • @steveDC51
      @steveDC51 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Just 7 years - you had barely started.

    • @kurtdorr
      @kurtdorr ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You sound like a barrel of laughs at parties. You always so fun?

    • @thomasgreene5750
      @thomasgreene5750 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      I spent more than 40 years in the industry. I learned in grad school that the general population consists of four groups of people. The first is a relatively small group in the "Amen Choir", and they are with you on philosophical grounds. A second, larger group is opposed on philosophical grounds, and nothing you say will change their minds. The third and largest group do not think much, do not care much, and if they are swayed at all, it is by whatever they last heard that they can remember. The last and smallest group contain people who know how to think critically and care enough to try to separate fact from fiction. This last group is the only one worth engaging with. You are wasting your time with the rest.

  • @jaredhamilton6913
    @jaredhamilton6913 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The breadth of your value as a teacher can not be overstated. Whether I’m revisiting things that are familiar, or those that I am still learning, you are the pulsing magnetar from which the field of information propagates into minds such as mine which, as nature would have it, responds to the field in a different way than the preponderance of others.
    So on behalf of all of those like myself, thank you for your unique attributes that bestow the force carriers of the field such that our minds may be bombarded by the quantum effects of the Arvinton field.

  • @shaunhayward
    @shaunhayward ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I love your videos. I barely have a high school education but find it tremendously interesting. You present things to very well. Thank you so much!

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad you like them!

  • @paulc96
    @paulc96 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thanks (again) Arvin for another excellent video, explained clearly. Love the Velcro example for the SNF - I have seen it demonstrated once before, with Velcro glued onto 2 bar magnets, then the two same poles being forced together. Please keep them coming. Best wishes from West Wales, UK.

  • @samorgan5361
    @samorgan5361 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is a treasure trove of a video, thank you!

  • @andreasg7543
    @andreasg7543 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Danke!

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks so much.

  • @kayodave7191
    @kayodave7191 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I find a good way to describe how ridiculously more powerful thermonuclear bombs are (hydrogen bombs) by pointing out, as Arvin says at 11:19, that a hydrogen bomb uses a fission bomb (i.e. the type of bombs used in WWII) as its TRIGGER. Imagine how much force it takes to squeeze the trigger of a gun vs how much damage a gun can do. That’s the kind of separation between the energy output of an atomic bomb vs a hydrogen bomb. Always awe inspiring and terrifying to think about.

  • @SSS-hr4ey
    @SSS-hr4ey ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Loved the video Arvin, best utilisation of 12 minutes I’ve experienced all week. Thanks

  • @randywa
    @randywa ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dangerously interesting is a phrase I have never heard before. I love it

  • @BenjaminGSlade
    @BenjaminGSlade 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks!

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      many thanks!

  • @andreyassa7638
    @andreyassa7638 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This video is amazing! To be conveniently ushered through all nuclear physics in such an educational and entertaining way, was quite impressive. I'm really grateful for you, producing always such enthralling content. On top you are such a kind and likeable person in my opinion, thanks a lot for all your effort!

  • @anthonycarbone3826
    @anthonycarbone3826 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The video was very informative and explained some concepts that needed explaining so understanding could take place. Much of what was said was taken for granted like it needed no explanation but Arvin Ash drilled down into the details missing from any physic lesson I have ever attended. The funny part is I did not even realize the details needed further explanation!!!

  • @Rationalific
    @Rationalific ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You give some of the very best scientific explanations out there! This relatively short video explained a ton and was super-entertaining as well! Keep up the great work!

  • @SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace
    @SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace ปีที่แล้ว

    1:36 - The nuclei of atoms are made up of protons and neutrons - The way i see it is that neutrons are as well protons and electrons - neutrons should be found at the equator or disc of any system(atoms, planets, stars etc) so there are protons working as neutrons and electrons working as well like neutrons.
    Likeor same charges repeal and as well cancel each other - any system or part with same charges wont be found.

  • @An_Attempt
    @An_Attempt ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautiful, you have answered questions that I have had for years.

  • @Raintiger88
    @Raintiger88 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow. . this is hands down the best explanations I've seen. Thanks for expanding my understanding!

  • @andycopeland7051
    @andycopeland7051 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Dangerously interesting at your next dinner party." Niiiiiiiice

  • @swordoftemple
    @swordoftemple ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This was the best explanation of the subject, thank you.

  • @alphaomega1351
    @alphaomega1351 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks! I can now add Nuclear Physicist to my resume. 😶

  • @mixerD1-
    @mixerD1- ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you Arvin... thoroughly enjoyed this.☺️

  • @claudiorassouli1240
    @claudiorassouli1240 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Never knew that gamma radiation is the byproduct of the protons and neutron realigning itself in the nucleus. Another great video where I learn just a couple new things. Thank you for breaking it down for me.

  • @ETAonTheEUC
    @ETAonTheEUC ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve been going on an information-binging spree concerning atomic energy, and this is the best and most conclusive video I’ve seen. Super cool stuff. Super interesting

  • @RM-pr4cw
    @RM-pr4cw ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love this channel! Wish it was around when I was studying university level physics in the 90s

  • @Dicer328
    @Dicer328 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wow fantastic video. great pace.

  • @UffeHellum
    @UffeHellum ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Always brilliant, but this time you really managed to put scary technical terms into simple birds-eye explanations. A great thank you, for dumbing it down enough to be pleasant for those 99% of us who are a little bit phobic of complicated words and math! Learning should be pleasant, not scary!

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly my sentiments! Glad you enjoyed it.

  • @Good13man
    @Good13man ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I learned so much from this video. Thank you!!

  • @SonuSingh-sn8qg
    @SonuSingh-sn8qg ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Liked this video before I even started watching it because I know it’s going to magnificent.

  • @WNCGBS
    @WNCGBS ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent tutorial, Arvin. Will share with my Physics students. Well done!

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's wonderful! Thanks for spreading scientific knowledge.

  • @mohammadslz8067
    @mohammadslz8067 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I cant tnx u enough for this amazing video , tnx man , i wish bests for you

  • @neurodivergent4life
    @neurodivergent4life ปีที่แล้ว +2

    th-cam.com/video/m3dpUk1emms/w-d-xo.html About that missing mass that has turned into energy... well, what is it? What heats the water inside a nuclear reactor?
    We've got a neutron + an atom worth of mass, then we have more atoms and neutrons... and energy? So what is that energy? 09:44

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The energy released is in the form of photons - gamma rays and other high energy photons.

  • @الباحثالعلميوالقران-ك1ق
    @الباحثالعلميوالقران-ك1ق ปีที่แล้ว

    السلام عليكم
    (أو خلقا مما يكبر في صدوركم فسيقولون من يعيدنا قل الذي فطركم أول مرة فسينغضون إليك رءوسهم ويقولون متى هو قل عسى أن يكون قريبا ﴾ [ الإسراء: 51]
    الصدور تعني النواة
    وغيرة هناك في المدارات شيء ايضا
    استاذي الكريم شكرا لك

  • @rwarren58
    @rwarren58 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    All concepts were explained so clearly I don’t have any questions, just a certain smugness due to new knowledge.

  • @HeyCurlyBoy
    @HeyCurlyBoy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is amazing, with these concepts I finally have a grasp of how nuclear fission works and how this generates energy

  • @wolfamadeus6932
    @wolfamadeus6932 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A great video, colleague!

  • @dr.michaellittle5611
    @dr.michaellittle5611 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Truly outstanding video!

  • @jaybruce593
    @jaybruce593 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Arvin has always been a top tier science educator, but his latest content has been knocking it out of the ball park, and this particular video goes as far as knocking it into another league, simply outstanding work my friend o7

    • @WSmith_1984
      @WSmith_1984 ปีที่แล้ว

      Modern science isn't correct.....
      All energy and matter in one simple explanation.... here goes...
      First we have a radio wave all the way to gamma waves which in turn create hydrogen then from there everything is basically a compound of hydrogen and will decay back to hydrogen before turning back to gamma waves.....
      There are no free moving electrons within matter....
      I use this analogy to simplify it in my mind..... imagine a line of people standing a mile long (each person represents a copper atom in a wire) the first person starts a Mexican wave at one end ( the source ) , as the information propagates along the line ( by exciting each atoms magnetic field ) you would see an continuous wave of the peoples arms transferring the charge/information back and forth but the atoms and electrons don't actually move at all.....
      Think about it, from the source where electricity is "generated" to the ultimate end use, there's various breaks in chain of that electricity, it goes through controllers, transformers, all sort of components.... the transmission happens because of the magnetic field strength of the atoms in the wire being increased and decreased, not because of an actual "electron" flowing anywhere....

  • @AnthonyGoodley
    @AnthonyGoodley ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for yet another educational video Arvin.
    I wish you would have touched upon how a Neutron bomb works. In many ways that'd be the deadliest type of Nuclear Bomb. Most people have never heard of it. Yet it is more likely to be used than any other type of Nuclear Bomb if it's being used strategically.

  • @Vienticus
    @Vienticus ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's a good, quick rundown.

  • @jamarort
    @jamarort ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excelent video. It's almost impossible to explain it better

  • @benjamindover4337
    @benjamindover4337 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why doesn't the fission chain reaction continue forever? Are lighter elements not destabilized by the neutrons entering their nucleus?

  • @Quadflash
    @Quadflash ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow! Dr. Ash, I have some conceptual understanding of the information you've presented here. As I watch your video (repeatedly), I'm awed by the flow and completeness of the information.
    For background, I've been fascinated by nuclear and quantum physics for years -- lots of classes and reading on these subjects. (I'm certainly not expert)
    I'm wondering what someone with little prior knowledge would find in this video? Wondering if many of your viewers would find a little pre-work useful before becoming seriously interesting people? 🌞

  • @LirimJusufi
    @LirimJusufi ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great episode!

  • @SumitPrasaduniverse
    @SumitPrasaduniverse ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You explain difficult topics in such an easy way. Hat's off to you 🤠

  • @DillaCat
    @DillaCat ปีที่แล้ว +1

    9:25
    So what you're saying is to *prepare for unforseen consequences λ*

  • @ahmedmussa1984
    @ahmedmussa1984 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great knowledgable man.

  • @gsmith8098
    @gsmith8098 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Great episode Arvin 👍
    Clear precise and informative. If quantum mechanics was as easy to understand, I'd be a physicist 🤣😜

  • @الباحثالعلميوالقران-ك1ق
    @الباحثالعلميوالقران-ك1ق ปีที่แล้ว

    قريبا سوف انشر هنا على صفحت تعليقات هذا الفديو
    كل مايحتاجه التاس لتطهير جسيماتهم
    هناك معادلات وايضا. تعليمات مهمه
    للحصول على اكبر طاقة لعملية التصادمات
    انت استاذي بدات فأكمل. هذه العملية لانتوقف
    حتى الوصول الى طاقة الصفر المطلق.
    هي الحقيقة لا اكثر ولا اقل الحقيقة
    لا تنسى العمل الخيري والالتزام بالاخلاق وغفر لكل من اخطئ في حقك

  • @ramadossc
    @ramadossc ปีที่แล้ว

    Simple yet outstanding!

  • @photon434
    @photon434 ปีที่แล้ว

    Arvin, this video answers so many questions, and it is so clear and concise. I just want to laminate it in gold and hang it on my wall. Amazing job. Thank you!

  • @ashishbarick
    @ashishbarick ปีที่แล้ว

    really nice graphics and explanation, sir.

  • @aliawan9595
    @aliawan9595 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing and brilliant.. You really explain difficult concepts so simply and make them look easy... Kudos 👏 💐

  • @connecticutaggie
    @connecticutaggie ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How small could you make a Fusion Bomb? Could you make one small enough that you could harness the energy?

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      100+ million degrees Celsius needs a lot of energy to be achieved. This is why powerful lasers are used in current fusion experiments. I am not sure how small a hydrogen bomb can go, but without lasers, I don't think you can achieve those temperatures without exploding a fission bomb.

    • @connecticutaggie
      @connecticutaggie ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ArvinAsh No, I mean keep the fission bomb, just contain it.

    • @yourguard4
      @yourguard4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@connecticutaggie There is a limit, how small you can make a fission bomb.
      You need a critical mass of radioactive material (for example ~ 50 kg uran or ~10 kg plutonium).
      Even the smallest atom bomb is still about the half of the power of the hiroshima bomb.
      Good luck by trying to contain this :P

  • @Paul_Ch52
    @Paul_Ch52 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ok I'm late. Everyone is saying all the sappy accolades I was thinking anyway so I'll just drop this here and add to the algorithm. Damn, Arvin, you're good.

  • @Dr-SauravRanjanDas
    @Dr-SauravRanjanDas ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing Videos. You are really great

  • @vitsirosh3722
    @vitsirosh3722 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Finally I will no longer be single now that I'm armed with dangerously interesting knowledge. Thank you

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I envision girls flocking to you already!

    • @brian.westersauce
      @brian.westersauce 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did it happen???

  • @alcyone1349
    @alcyone1349 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the video and title. I will try to use my knowledge for good but no promises.

  • @J_i_m_
    @J_i_m_ ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @3:42 I'm so glad that you consider Bismuth as unstable and thus radioactive. Many do not agree on this, including ChatGPT (and of course they are wrong 😁)

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is pretty stable, but not completely, as you know. Half life is pretty long.

  • @dhananjayray4611
    @dhananjayray4611 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I gonna fan of your teaching style, vast knowledge of science n very easily graspable content

  • @الباحثالعلميوالقران-ك1ق
    @الباحثالعلميوالقران-ك1ق ปีที่แล้ว +1

    احداث
    نوح في التراث الانساني اخترعها الانسان
    والحفيقة هي كانت
    اقتراب نهاية دورة ونوح نشر الحقيقة
    لقد كان يتصادم معهم فكريا
    هذا الدليل
    واتل عليهم نبأ نوح إذ قال لقومه يا قوم إن كان كبر عليكم مقامي وتذكيري بآيات الله فعلى الله توكلت فأجمعوا أمركم وشركاءكم ثم لا يكن أمركم عليكم غمة ثم اقضوا إلي ولا تنظرون (71) يونس
    كبر عليكم مقامي
    تصادمات
    الحروف تحكي الحدث بالتفصيل
    فإن توليتم فما سألتكم من أجر إن أجري إلا على الله وأمرت أن أكون من المسلمين (72) فكذبوه فنجيناه ومن معه في الفلك وجعلناهم خلائف وأغرقنا الذين كذبوا بآياتنا فانظر كيف كان عاقبة المنذرين (73)
    الفلك دالة موجيه مقياس الحدث
    هنا الاكوان المتوازية
    والذين كذبوا اغرقوا يعني تم حجزهم في ظلمات الزمكان
    كذالك موسى كذالك ابراهيم الخ
    دورة امم
    الوعد الاول تقتحم الانظمة وعلماء الكم العقبة
    يعني جسيم الرب
    ويحجز المستكبرون من العلماء والمتعلمون والفاسدون في ظلمات الزمكان
    واما المساكين تمتصهم المادة المظلمة. ويسبتوا فيها
    ياتي الوعد الثاني تقريبا. بعد خمسون الف سنة
    ويبدا الحساب
    وتبدا دورة جديدة
    تتم عملية قسم لجسيمات من سوف تفنيهم المادة المضادة
    قبل الاصتدام بهم
    فيعود هاؤلاء ومن كانوا مرد اول.
    لذالك اصحاب المرد الثاني ليس لديهم اي فرصة
    إلا هذه يجب الوصول لهم لاجل انقاذهم
    ولا احد منكم سيشعر من اي مرد هوا إلا بعض
    الناس وهم قلة وذالك بسبب محوا ذكرياتهم
    هذا قانون. كوني لانهم لو عادوا مع ذكرياتهم فسوف يرفعون من حرارة الكون
    هذا موجود في القران غدا سوف انشر هذه الاية واية عن ؤغوة الزمكان ايضا

  • @gerhardwiesinger
    @gerhardwiesinger ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice, some questions:
    What happens to the Alpha particle hitting e.g. the paper (or any other object)?
    What happens to the Beta particle hitting e.g. the aluminium foil (or any other object)?
    What happens to the gamma radiation hitting some other object?
    Will the object hit by Alpha, Beta particles or gamma radiation also get "radioactive"?

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Great question! Alpha particle in a typical nuclear decay does not have a whole lot of energy, and since it's heavy, it has a short range. It may ionize atoms as it passes by them by ripping their electrons away. And it will then typically bounce off an object, much the same way that a helium atom would. A beta particle will simply lose its energy in the atomic structure of the object that it hits, contributing a little bit to the thermal energy of the object. A gamma particle would need to pretty much hit the nucleus of an atom to be stopped, that's why it penetrates so deeply.

    • @CraftyF0X
      @CraftyF0X ปีที่แล้ว

      Ultimatelly, the alpha particle becomes a helium-4 after sufficiently slowing down and getting 2 electron for itself. (this process provides the current helium-4 stock of Earth) The beta particle is just an electron and after losing its kinetic energy due to scattering or bremsthrelung it just hangs around depending on what absorbed it mostly as the part of the enviroment as an ion or in a metal just as member of the electron sea.
      Gamma radiation may cause a photo electric effect with an atom's electron (kicking it out of the atom) participate in pair production (when it interacts with a nucleus but this require certain high energy levels) also may Compton scatters from an electron and lose energy to it. A sufficiently high energy gamma ray can also induce photo fission in a suitable nucleus. Now as I think about it really depends on the gamma energy level and the material it meets, it even can cause neutron emission when it radiates Be-9.

  • @k7iq
    @k7iq ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video !

  • @wefinishthisnow3883
    @wefinishthisnow3883 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love your work Arvin. I put you right there with Sabine, Nick(Science Asylum) and Brian Greene as my favourite science communicators.
    I feel smarter for having watched any of your videos.

    • @simonmaverick9201
      @simonmaverick9201 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How can you compare him with Sabine????? You obviously have a lot to learn.

  • @JeremyIlliscavitch
    @JeremyIlliscavitch 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I absolutely love your channel, I rather enjoy educational content, and I find myself binge watching your videos. Thank you for all of the enlightenment!🧠

  • @keopsequinox1624
    @keopsequinox1624 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Every undergraduate student in Physics should get a series of mandatory Arvin Ash classes at some point :D

  • @jamesdevine620
    @jamesdevine620 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you have a special talent

  • @أشرفحميد-خ3س
    @أشرفحميد-خ3س ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Many thanks

  • @alfadog67
    @alfadog67 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ah, the "learning" dopamine just keeps coming. Thanks, Professor Ash!
    I noticed the nuclei seem to have random nucleons positioned throughout, but I wonder, are they in superposition while floating around the nucleus, rather than the little balls that we perceive?

    • @erikawanner7355
      @erikawanner7355 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would guess yes. The “balls” are just for visual representation

  • @PhilipMurphy8Extra
    @PhilipMurphy8Extra ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video Arvin, Through I did have to go digging to find this content. TH-cam Algorithm not so perfect after all.

  • @Pablo_Toulouse
    @Pablo_Toulouse ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Belle conclusion Arvin. Peux-tu maintenant me dire quelle est l energie totale maximale que je pourrai restituer à l’univers ? Energie potentielle, ... ? Merci

  • @hijab-o3n911
    @hijab-o3n911 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Informative

  • @001firebrand
    @001firebrand ปีที่แล้ว

    Just brilliant, our honored scientist, Dr. Ash! 💖

  • @7JeTeL7
    @7JeTeL7 ปีที่แล้ว

    aplaus for explanation of unstability of havier elements, many thx! 10:02 but what energy is released? i mean, it could not be that of strong force; even fissioned nucleons are still carriers of the same amount of strong force and are perfectly capable of fusion into havier elements again...

  • @ericderbez2446
    @ericderbez2446 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It might have been good to explain beta+ decay too for completeness.

  • @SoundzAlive1
    @SoundzAlive1 ปีที่แล้ว

    I will apply this knowledge to some Unobtainium whenever I get some. André

  • @jjrmm7
    @jjrmm7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Gotta rewatch this right before watching Oppenheimer

  • @alexdemoura9972
    @alexdemoura9972 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dear Arvin, thanks for the explanation - I really appreciated it.
    I have a (stupid) question since I just got my "DINPA" degree - 10 minutes away from going to my Nuclear Physicist one:
    If the Neutron decays into a Proton + Electron + Antineutrino - and the atom gets a new positive charge - shouldn't the (new) free Electron fit a position in the electrosphere and orbit the nucleus of the very same atom? To keep the atom electromagnetically balanced? So why is there beta radiation (made by Electrons)? Why not only Antineutrinos radiation?
    Is there too much energy (too much speed of a particle) in Neutron decay, and the atom can't keep the Electron to itself?

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  ปีที่แล้ว

      Great question! Correct that It is typically carrying too much to be captured. However, as you know the universe prefers to have charge neutrality. This does happen because in most materials at room temperature, there are always some ionized atoms and free electrons. These are available to neutralize ionized atoms.

    • @alexdemoura9972
      @alexdemoura9972 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArvinAsh I got it. Thank you so much, Arvin.

  • @connecticutaggie
    @connecticutaggie ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for making me more dangerous 😈

  • @marquisdesade6156
    @marquisdesade6156 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Greatest physics teacher in the world

  • @nomanvardag1
    @nomanvardag1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks to Arvin, and other physics UTubers, I am already a DINPA.

  • @neverstopdreaming-do6di
    @neverstopdreaming-do6di ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I salute to you my brilliant respected sir

  • @israelsadovnik
    @israelsadovnik ปีที่แล้ว

    Simple atom = electron + proton
    An atom is considered 99% empty because the distance between
    an electron and a proton is 10^-10m. But if an atom contains
    an electron and two protons, then the particles are closer to each other
    by as much as five orders of magnitude (10^-15m) and
    the more complex the atom, the closer the particles are to each other,
    and the stronger their connection.

    • @DrDeuteron
      @DrDeuteron 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the H size is good, but the He size is all wrong. 1 fm? An electron can't be confined to 1 fm. See: Compton Wavelength.

  • @venkybabu8140
    @venkybabu8140 ปีที่แล้ว

    All nuclear bonds are due to speed and spin of electrons. They bind them with a fast strings positive and negative forces. The are also responsible for chemical bonds and polarity. The chemical bonds are because of directions change. Neutrons are required only for balance of protons.

  • @jessedampare1379
    @jessedampare1379 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As a nuclear physicist, ash lied. Nuclear physicist is sooooooo fun 😂😂😂😂😂 great video!

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  ปีที่แล้ว

      I completely agree with you! But I stand by my statement, haha.

  • @benphillips66
    @benphillips66 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Finally! How has it taken tho long to get this lesson?

  • @Pukuotukas
    @Pukuotukas ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes, I agree with you. It's dangerous, even insane interesting. When first time heard this info about fission, fusion, radioactivity, decay and quantum things i can't sleep few months. Thinking and looking more info about that. More, MORE and *MORE!* That's how I find yours channel 😁 you have explained almost everything in those videos. Now I can sleep well 😁 thank you 🎉

  • @ATSFVentaSpurNscaler
    @ATSFVentaSpurNscaler ปีที่แล้ว

    This was an excellent primer video, but at its end you forgot to mention the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's recent fusion breakthrough using lasers. For the first time in human history, scientists achieved net energy gain from nuclear fusion without using a hydrogen bomb.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We have achieved fusion using lasers before, the breakthrough appears to be that in the LLB experiment, there was net positive energy created. This, however, needs to be verified.

    • @ATSFVentaSpurNscaler
      @ATSFVentaSpurNscaler ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArvinAsh Yes, thank you for clarifying that the breakthrough appears to be in the experiment’s net energy gain. To be sure as you’ve mentioned, independent verification remains essential for this (and, for that matter, every) scientific breakthrough.

  • @taniaumar5942
    @taniaumar5942 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awosome ..... I m science student n teacher ... Valuable ❤

  • @TimeSum21
    @TimeSum21 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks, you brought me one step closer to becoming a mad scientist. Lol

  • @Yubel1100
    @Yubel1100 ปีที่แล้ว

    Curious are we sure that neutrons in the nucleus remain stable and dont just decay then the electron is immediately captured by a proton which would produce an neutrino which would annihilate with the antineutrino originially produced thus making it appear as if nothing changed.

  • @cleander97
    @cleander97 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I knew all of this when I was only 2

  • @ThinAirElon
    @ThinAirElon ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you made my college physics course to go to dust ! Honestly i wasted 2 years and dint understand. After watching your video multiple time I am happy now

  • @babyoda1973
    @babyoda1973 ปีที่แล้ว

    Every time I re-watch it a little more clicks thanks

  • @AdamTheJensen
    @AdamTheJensen ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Really terrific explanations. I've read a fair amount about radiation, but never realized that beta particles come from the decay of a neutron into a proton. I definitely learned a few things today. Thanks for the video!

  • @Ethan7s
    @Ethan7s ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant WILL make you a nuclear physicist in 10 minutes though.

  • @Jimmywuu636
    @Jimmywuu636 ปีที่แล้ว

    So particles decay and decay and decay. Does decay equal entropy? That would made black holes black helium holes?

  • @ronblaess1
    @ronblaess1 ปีที่แล้ว

    This brilliant video has 6k views after five hours. A hamster in a maze has 600k after the same time. This is a scathing indictment of humanity.

  • @simoaymb
    @simoaymb 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    شكرا ❤