I disagree i think the piano makes it sound like mud due to the sustain pedal. This isn't the fault of the performers though. The piano just naturally sounds muddy when trying to "sustain" notes
one of the most beautiful things ever written for orchestra, and this arrangement is quite beautifully done, although i find this recording quite boring and lacking in dimension and overall excitement. there are some passages originally so full of energy and here it sounds... bland.
Beautiful interpretation but this is the wrong score, this seems to be the version for 4 hands, not the 2 pianos, which has a few differences, good piece tho
Would help if you could show the time points where the second and third movements begin, ideally with a link to start them at that point: _Jeux de Vagues:_ th-cam.com/video/lvY9IxPzeAY/w-d-xo.html and _Dialogue du vent et de la mer_ th-cam.com/video/lvY9IxPzeAY/w-d-xo.html
![Paul Hindemith - Sonata for Two Pianos (1942) [Score-Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zpHZkiZHOSM/mqdefault.jpg)
Although the orchestral version sounds better, this reduction makes things a lot clearer
00:00 - 8:21 I. De l’aube à midi sur la mer
8:21 - 16:52 II. Jeux de vagues
16:52 - 25:40 III. Dialogue du vent et de la mer
Breathtaking composition and a great transcription
This transcription certainly captures the soul..
@Xander Vance Yea, been using flixzone for since november myself :D
@Xander Vance yea, I've been watching on flixzone for months myself :D
@@xandervance1123 report bots like these
Thanks! :3
This is stunning
I love this piece! no idea that there was a piano reduction, I'm into it baby.
I prefer this one just for listening because the orchestra recordings or conduction make it sound like la Mud.
I disagree i think the piano makes it sound like mud due to the sustain pedal. This isn't the fault of the performers though. The piano just naturally sounds muddy when trying to "sustain" notes
somehow like this a little better than the orchestral version
Notes:
4:12
one of the most beautiful things ever written for orchestra, and this arrangement is quite beautifully done, although i find this recording quite boring and lacking in dimension and overall excitement. there are some passages originally so full of energy and here it sounds... bland.
I agree, unfortunately that's the case for almost all 2 piano transcriptions I've heard
Beautiful interpretation but this is the wrong score, this seems to be the version for 4 hands, not the 2 pianos, which has a few differences, good piece tho
it is definitely the 2 piano score
They're leaving out so much that it might as well be, yeah.
Would help if you could show the time points where the second and third movements begin, ideally with a link to start them at that point: _Jeux de Vagues:_ th-cam.com/video/lvY9IxPzeAY/w-d-xo.html and _Dialogue du vent et de la mer_ th-cam.com/video/lvY9IxPzeAY/w-d-xo.html
どこでペダルを抜くか、ではなく、どこでペダルを使うか、を考えて欲しかった。
「どこでペダルを使うか」を考えてほしかったということを、もう少し詳しく教えていただけませんか？