"PATHETIC Lack Of Sentence Was Disgraceful!" | Isabel Oakeshott Fumes Over Ex-BBC's Huw Edwards
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ย. 2024
- Rules for reviewing “unduly lenient” sentences should be expanded to cover more crimes, London’s victims’ commissioner has said in the wake of Huw Edwards’ suspended sentence.
The former BBC newsreader received a six-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, on Monday after he admitted possessing indecent images of children.
The fact he was not sent to prison immediately has drawn criticism from some quarters but there is no way to change his sentence.
Isabel Oakeshott argues that disgraced BBC presenter Huw Edwards' trial for child abuse image offences "should not have been held in a Magistrates Court".
"That pathetic lack of a sentence was absolutely disgraceful!"
Click here for more from Talk talk.tv
If you need any help visit: talk.tv/helplines
#huwedwards #bbc #sentence
Should have been a minimum 10 year sentence.
In 1998 I got a £70 fine for visiting a pub I was barred from. The magistrate said this amounted to harassment. Huw Edwards gets nothing.
When I worked in a prison we had 27 child sex offenders, including 2 magistrates,
3 police officers, 2 teachers, and a priest. All of them blamed their mental health which
appears to be the magic get-out-of-jail card for paedophiles these days.
@tutortony8615 - Which just goes to prove that a whole new way of trying to handle
certain 'realities' needs to be thought through, understood, and put in place!
... Will a prison sentences ever 'cure' certain deviants? 🤔
This is the least surprising thing I have read this year.
Pretty sure the guy I went to school with used that excuse as well. He did go to prison, but not for long
No suprise.
The fish is smelling very strong.
The system basically says that free speech BAD, Pdfiles Good.. Thats how sick the system is today.
This is nonsense. Speech has never been totally free and many of those convicted incited violence against individuals or groups.
@@garethwilliams976 LOL you keep telling yourself that matey boy.... But then you still didn't even agree that they treat hurty words worse than pdfilia.. SO mute point really..
🤬The judge is in my view as guilty as Huw Edward’s!! We need to protect our children.
I will be writing to the CPS and making a complaint.
Exactly Kevin do not pass go do not collect £200 straight off to the slammer.
@rosielee938 - 🤨Sorry, all "slammers" are overbooked at present! 🥸
CPS is not fit for purpose, same as the whole justice system in this country. Its abysmal, they let real criminals run free and fine or imprison people who commited trivial crimes. Its mind bogglingy ridiculous
unfurling a flag is not a minor offense. It is not an offense....
Don't even fine him. Crazy.
Crown court job. We was conned
These Judges need to be investigated 😠
They can only do what you allow them to do. You are in charge of your law. If you do not press for greater severity it is your fault.
Said to my Dad when Huw Edwards admitted his depraved crimes he wouldn't go to jail. My Dad said he would. Pathetic six month suspended sentence. Huw Edwards playing the mental health card as well.
Not only is it disgusting that he walked free, it's cruel to the poor children that this has happened to & a very dangerous message to the same disgusting paedophiles that walk amongst us 🤬🤬😡
Hi Jean, for me it kind of says the judge likes the same type of team because we know they’re all corrupt
Remember the elderly lady who was threatened with arrest for having a bird feeder in her own back garden ?
Who? I missed that one.
@@garethwilliams976 United Kingdom .UK . About two years ago . Sorry can't send a link . Old lady on a computer 🤔 Actually got threatened for feeding birds . You couldn't make this stuff up 🤔 Best wishes to you 👍
Trying to normalise it for the Muhammad’s….
Judges have been doing this for years, half of them are involved in the same sick cruelty to children and babies.....😠😠😠💔💔💔💔💔💔
I know this doesn’t help but
Spew Edward’s 🤮🤮 RIP 🪦 justice
Is this incitement to violence?
The fact that it didn't go Crown court is bcos....i say again.....special club ...
Well, he's very recognisable, and won't be able to walk down any street in the UK, so maybe he'll wish that it hadn't been fixed to keep him out of prison.
Sad thing is he’s a multi millionaire, he doesn’t need to walk down the street as your average person would.
@MrSmriley - In the film, he flies off to Thailand asap, buys himself a villa and a yacht! 🥸
They get pat on the backs from their judge group leaders.
1st time offender, NO FIRST TIME GETTING CAUGHT, HE'S committed multiple offences duh.
You have evidence of this? Police had access to his conputers so they would have uncovered more evidence. Unless of course there was a cover up which I am sure you believe there was.
The guy who sent him the images and many more to others only got a 12 month suspended sentence apparently... yet a woman who recorded the riots on her phone is going to prison...
She did more than that!
@@garethwilliams976 this was a woman in stoke on trent, it even said all she did was record and post it to tik tok.. but not 100% sure tbh
You mean first time caught
Prove further offending or shut up.
@@garethwilliams976 seek and yee shall find
I've been saying all week that the fact he was only tried at magistrates suggested his sentence was pre determined before the trial began
He gets off scot free,the children get a life sentence and others like him think its basically legal when judges hand our non sentences too animals like him,judge didn't even mention the children im told,what an utter disgrace of an outcome, beyond belief.
The magistrates court was not competent to deal with this case. The public need protection and proper investigation into the entire background of what has been going on. Also why the law itself is inadequate. So should have been crown court at least.
The magistrate has himself should be investigated for competence and why he was fawning over Edwards.
This is nonsense. The maximum sentence in Magistrates is 2 years and he was never going to get more. Had it gone to Crown he would still have got less as he could have pleaded the sentence unduly harsh citing what others had got. Why waste money?
I really am surprised that everyone is shocked that people like Huw got away with it. People like Huw are protected especially as they all say mental health.
Any one else notice that the suitcase was empty? It seemed to bounce along the pavement and Huw lifted it into the car without effort. The sentence was known before he went to court, the overnight bag was just pantomime.
🤔hmmm... It's all very confusing! ... So many comments saying this guy should be in a
prison cell⁉... Haven't people learnt yet that all the prisons are SO full, that people like
him, with FAR worse offences, are presently all being released back onto the streets⁉😲
He should of got ten years.
Surely this was a Crown Court offence? He was not parking his car badly or dropping litter. How come it went to Magistrate? Surely that wants a bit of wind back? Edwards was under a cloud in 2008. First offence only means not been caught....
its how the justice system thinks the abuse of children means nothing sick he and the others should be behind bars for a very long time no matter where the children are from it was all about him him not the victims as usual this country is down the drain morally and injustice
He should have been remanded in custody until his Crown Court apperence then the Judge sentence him to 10 years
I know someone who got caught with less than hew Edwards and got 5years
Edwards has friends in high places who may do the same so thay are protecting each other
British justice used to be the world bench mark...
I could listen to Isabel all day. Outstanding lady.
They look after their own
Spot on!!!
Frankly Edward’s should have gone to prison, the magistrates court was and is the wrong place for this kind of crime. Frankly I find it ridiculous that a defendant can appeal the sentence but prosecutors cannot.
So how come explicit videos of Male Genital Mutilation (aka circumcision) can be viewed on TH-cam--with all the agony, screaming, bondage, blood and non-consent? And NSPCC and Internet Watch Foundation turn a blind eye!?
I’m glad he wasn’t sent to prison.
Maybe judges are involved too
Hell, the judges are up to the same stuff as Edwards.
The sender of the images wasn't jailed so that Edwards wouldn't be.
Problem with AI is what happens when that starts going the way you don't like? Who do you then blame?
If had there been a maximum custodial of under 2 years this was within the powers of the magistrates so why bother with Crown? Edwards did wrong but was a minor player and did not take, gain money from or distribute the images . Perhaps unless we uprate the sentencing guidelines the sentence is appropriate.
Oakeshott. What a woman
We all make mistakes
Buddy buddy justice
All sorted in the masonic lodge?
yea they got that wrong, was supposed to be crown!
I hope Starmer is happy when he punches out of work at 6pm on a Friday evening to go and watch Taylor Swift or Arsenal for free, that he has made this all possible. Where the worst kind of people who pray on children walk free and people who shout at police dogs get jail. Any normal person who creates such a topsy-turvy justice system would not be able to sleep at night. Of course you would have to have a concience to be affected by such decisions.
After this they ought to release the likes of gary glitter,because this is a disgrace to the Law system
MAP Pride Forever! 🤣🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈
they had behind bing a good person they are not
Well it does tend to involve slot of the establishment doesnt it....old boys club much
Ps who sent him images
The leniency was there at the outset for Edwards, it should have been crown court and he should have been locked up
Isabel's suggestion of introducing 'un-biased AI judgements' is really quite intelligent!🥸👍
Hi Jean, for me it kind of says the judge likes the same type of team because we know they’re all corrupt