SUBSCRIBE! If you enjoyed go watch the FULL guide to EVERYTHING in FNAF: th-cam.com/video/_BohC_Yo9RU/w-d-xo.html If you're wondering why I uploaded this, head over to my community post - explains it pretty well! :P Merry Christmas, have a happy new year, and I'll see you all next year for brand new content! :D
9:07 Concerning the discrepancy between "new summer job" and the November Paycheck, I remember Matpat mentioning that both those phone calls were pre-recorded training tapes. They were recorded in the summer for new hires at the time, and no one bothered to change or update them later down the line. You are never in a live conversation with the Phone Guy.
If Fnaf ever does end Scott should make a Final Guide Book that tells us the Full Story of Fnaf along with all the theory’s that people got Right and Wrong over the Years along with a Complete Timeline. Or maybe Scott could make an Animated Series that Combines Lore Elements from the Games - Books and Movies into while adjusting certain things and adding new stuff to make 1 complete Timeline.
And me thinking I was the only one with that idea. Once Scott retires for good, because one day he will have to, I hope he gives us the story with everything we got right, and wrong, and what could've happened different (looking at you fnaf4 box)
@@HyperDroid this dude ain't going to let the series die. He's essentially feeding off the hype train which is why there's another aspect of the lore to unpack that literally makes no sense. the mimic is ridiculous.
Being honest, I've never liked the fact that there were another 5 dead children besides the ones from the MCI that NEVER get any resolution. Like, the MCI kids get gravestones with their names on them, and the DCI kids get... maybe a reference in the Happiest Day minigame? IDK, I feel like they should have gotten something.
I think that's because they're really not important to the overall narrative. If they are in the toy animatronics,then they got scrapped,if not then they're not important. We don't even know the names of these kids or what gender they are,that's how irreverent they are.
I get that, they're just exclusive to the second game, their stories start and then end in the same game (once being dismantled) so it just seems like they're not that important when really it's just because their stories are done
This is why I prefer someone else interpretation of the timeline (John) He speculated that because the children are killed but NOT stuffed into any suits, and simply left in the open, this means their souls are not bound to anything and can move on naturally. The reason the toys act up is because the old animatronics were being used for spare parts and service for the toy animatronics. Thus infusing the toy animatronics with a part of the remnant composing the withered scraps. When they got scrapped, the parts were then used to refurbish the withereds and the plastic shells were discarded.
@@X-SPONGED adding on to that, they wernt ever missing, so in universe their families wouldve been able to give them a proper burial/funural etc. so while it was a tragedy they didnt need closure, unlike the MCI who did need closure.
53:00 The Biggest Issue With Mike Being The "Vengeful Spirit" Is That Said Spirit Also Goes By "The One You Should Have Not Killed" And Michael Only Died By Elizabeth/Ennard (Technically) And Burned To Deatg By Henry In FNAF6, William Never Directly Killed Michael, Meaning That He's Not "The One You Should Not Have Killed/Vengeful Spirit"
they explained that in their video by saying William knew the animatronics would confuse Mike for himself, and knew that they wanted to kill him, thus knowingly sending Mike into a deathtrap without really caring if he lived through it and basically causing his death despite not having to physically kill him
@DragoBot It still doesn't make sense as Michael only wanted to end William's rein of terror. Once he knew William was going to die in the fire, he would have been at peace that William could no longer hurt anybody else.
Didn't expect to see myself in dis video again lol, caught me by surprise! But I appreciate a shorter version of the supreme guide focused on da lore. I've kinda forgotten a lot of it, so having dis was definitely a nice refresher! Keep up the great work bro!! :D
I actually appreciate all the effort put into this by everyone involved, and I also find the "bias switch" really cool and a very respectable detail, because a lot of people like to actually just claim all their theories as fact without really explaining the other options. I like all the different theories put into this, too, because it allows viewers to decide what they might think is the right answer without forcing them to agree with everything that one person might think is true. So cool!
@Luokeyo when using the 1993 date like the video itself shows this statement is false, it all depends on when you think FNAF 1 takes place, if you use 1993 as the date the coupons come from then it's indeed impossible to take place during or before 2017 since that'll be $26 instead, if you use 1992 then yes it's the other way around I state all over the video 1993 is what I'm using
Hyperdroid: Everyone put in a brief summary of your best theory. Also Hyperdroid: I'm putting the deluxe director's cut of the Dave theory in the middle of this. Stop calling him crying child damnit!
18:05, the answer is simple: If these shadow animatronics are results of the springlock failures, shadow bonnie can STILL be that despite his model, because it's extremely easy to just think "scott had no design for springbonnie yet so he used the closest thing he had". Same reason why "Golden Freddy" (Fredbear) doesn't look like a different animatronic at all and instead is just a recolored freddy
That's been my reasoning as to why Shadow Bonnie resembles Toy Bonnie more than Springtrap, too. His appearances in FNAF 3 (especially in his minigame) still make me think he's supposed to be more like Springtrap than Toy Bonnie.
I've loved the FNAF franchise since I was 12 years old, but has anybody else considered that Scott Cawthon is probably just a bad story teller and may not have a plan at all? The story is covered with plot holes, the games have been hit or miss since help wanted having seemingly lost their soul, up until very recently all of the books were so inconsistent that we are constantly debating there canonicity, and since game four the entire community hasnt been able to find a single theory the can be confirmed as the story or is a story valid enough to be accepted by the majority that wasn't later disproven. I'm beginning to think that Markiplier, Matpat, the theorist community and the fact that the games are unsolvable are the only reason these games sell at all. I'll stay for the theories but I've given up on the story entirely
@lancelux To be fair, no one can plan a decade ahead. There have been a lot of ganes coming out in that time. They still make sense, but he and Steelwool keep stuff vague on our purpose.
@user-fe8gx3ie5v That fairness comes only if steel wool is given all of the necessary information regarding exactly what the game should be (Steel wool went on to say they were giving a vague idea), if there was a complete and concise story that they were trying to tell without major dialogue and information being cut from security breach (The main lore drop of the steel wool games), and if the lore being given in the relevant book series cannon or not answers the question we have regarding the flaws in the games. And to the idea that no one can write a decade ahead, major writing tip "You don't start telling a story if you don't know how it should end". You don't need to plan ten years ahead, but you need to plan for the end of your story.
Why is no one talking about the cheeky single frame text at 15:10 only to realise it’s just the “these are my ideas on the lore”? @HyperDroid had me looking into the super deep one frame clue to realise it’s that 😂.
i love that fnaf keeps consistently giving me more and more video essays to listen to, like yes please. i am SEATED🧎. keep feeding me more and more things to think about when it comes to this series, i love rotating each fnaf addition (movie, books, games) in my head like it’s in a microwave. 😌(i love being fed sm things & being able to have almost an infinite amount of videos to binge about this series🫶🫶)
Regarding what Scott said about the box the first time in his post, I think he wasn't talking so much on *what's* in the box, but *how* the box tells the story. He said that what's in the box is "The pieces put together." That reads as the full story of the games clearly laid out for us like a fully pieced together jigsaw puzzle. "But would the community accept it that way?" "that way" being the aforementioned how. And I can see why he would be so hesitant. The majority of FNAF's appeal is its mystery and the fan base putting their heads together to solve it. Would we as a community really have accepted the story just being told to us when we already get so much fun figuring it out ourselves? I particularly love how Scott practically gushes over how the fandom figured out his story for the first 3 games. It shows a lot of love that Scott not only for his craft but his fans as well.
i personally think that when the crying child responds "i can hear sounds" it means that he can sometimes hear sounds or memories of the plush talking to him but he knows its not the fredbear plush
I like the theory that the reason that Michaels last name is Schmidt is because he is using his mothers maiden name instead of Afton. Its possible that his parents were divorced, which explains why William can build such elaborate things without a functional adult asking questions.
I can’t wait to watch the rest of the video! This seems like so much hard work and it’s going to be great to listen throughout the day! Sad to see the recent up and coming FNAF theorist FuhNaff isn’t here 😭 we love John
@@HyperDroidI got to the point of the video where he was mentioned! So everyone is here! (Insert Smash Ultimate theme here) Your video is amazing though, I’m still just half way through it. As an adult fan of fnaf since it started, your video is such a treat!! Covering damn near everything!! You’ve gotten a new subscriber my friend!!
1:21:57 You know, I always had this wild theory that the mask we give to Roxy is an old animatronic mask. Considering that they bothered to give an explanation as to why Roxy looks different and the fact that at the back of the wrench we see a code that links back to a Fredbear’s Family Diner mini game makes me believe that this mask belongs to an animatronic we’ll encounter in SOTM. What animatronic specifically I’m not sure though it would be wild if it turned out to be Fredbear’s mask.
3:38:53 what did you just call me! jokes aside, this is incredibly impressive and i appreciate the thought and detail put into it! a few of my personal ideas were changed
I don't understand why people would say that a book character like Andrew exists in the games, like, what would that even add? We already have Cassidy, who would fill the exact same role, why bring in a single book character and not all the others too?
I've got a stupid theory: FNAF 4 actually took place in 1987 and we were vastly overthinking it. The main proof of it being 1983 is the date on the TV, right? But here's the thing. Go turn on your TV right now, flip through the channels, and tell me how many of the shows you find on were made this year. The show on the TV could have just been a re-run. I think the game is in 1987 and only the show is from 1983. Evidence: Elizabeth's room has a mangle. Mangle was introduced in FNAF 2, which is in 1987. The Chica toy the girl has is missing a beak. Scott asked us why the toy would be missing its beak, right? Easy. Toy Chica in FNAF 2 is missing her beak, and FNAF 2 is in 1987. Why were Mangle and Toy Chica in this game? Quote from that post from Scott: "I guess most people assumed that I filled the game with random easter eggs this time. I didn't." The Mangle specifically is often times just ignored as a sort of easter egg. Scott was straight up telling us it's not an easter egg, it's important. And that's not even accounting for the bite. Maybe it WAS meant to be the bite of '87 after all. It also explains the hospital equipment. Crying Child was hospitalized after the bite and in critical condition, but he DID survive otherwise there wouldn't be any medical equipment (you wouldn't put a corpse on life support, after all). And of course, in FNAF 1, Phone Guy says the one who got bitten survived. But we all assumed it was 1983, hence why Scott said "No one, not a single person, found the pieces. The story remains completely hidden." We vastly overthought everything, and the simple answer was the right one all along. WAS. Remember how Scott also said that something got retconned due to a contradiction and he doesn't think anyone noticed? What if that was this? What if FNAF 4 WAS originally in 1987, but we all agreed on 1983, and Scott retconned it to be 1983 after the fact. There has since been a bunch of evidence proving it to be 1983 so that's now the correct answer, but what if we all got it wrong originally and that convinced Scott into changing the answer for us because we overlooked the obvious part of the bite in the game being THE bite? "But the bigger question is - would the community accept it that way?" We decided on our answer, and if we were proven wrong, we may not have accepted it or been happy about it because it was TOO obvious. "The fact that the pieces have remained elusive this time strikes me as incredible" could be he was surprised we didn't take the obvious answer. Hell, maybe he liked our answer of 1983 better, which is why he called it "special, a fitting conclusion in some ways" and maybe "some things are best left forgotten" is referring to this whole theory. Maybe it's best that we forget all the evidence pointing to 1987 and just go with 1983 from now on. Forever. This is also why the contents of the box changed. "It's for that very reason. It's because of what I was intending that game to be when it happened, and then after the reaction of it, I need to craft this into something better for the people who see this as important." Also, FNAF 4 being in 1987 doesn't include dream theory.
I mean true with the TV show point. I know episodes of Breaking Bad and The Walking Dead from the 2000s and 2010s are on AMC. Episodes of Frasier and Cheers are on TV.
I had never really believed crying child was Dave until now, you explained it so well. And having Dave being found in the foxy grid works well cause it's tying CC back to Michael his brother the one who accidentally killed him whilst wearing a foxy mask. Idk why that just clicks so well in my mind for me.
I think the reason FNAF lore is so incomplete and convoluted is because it's meant to be a pick-and-choose-your-own-headcanon kind of thing. Like looking at a rainbow, everyone who sees the story of FNAF will have their own unique interpretation of it through their eyes. There are some basic canonical "facts" in the story, like how a rainbow always has the same colors in it, but since no person is exactly the same as another and we can't see through each other's eyes, any interpretation someone makes is still technically unique to them. The "base story" is just the bare endoskeleton, and we can add the outer plastic, cloth, or fur, fangs and claws, or cheerful smiles, rosy cheeks, etc. to it to create our own killer animatronic. There are a multitude of pieces that can all lead in different directions or point to different truths, and no single ending is necessarily the "true" one. We are free to choose which pieces we use and arrange them as we please. Just like Mangle. Just like Ultimate Custom Night. Just like the recent interactive novels. Just like the different endings in the games. Maybe, at one point, The Box contained the official, canonical lore of FNAF: "the pieces put together". But then, Scott saw all the theories, all the mystery, all the engagement and love his fans poured into trying to figure it out on their own, and all the million different interpretations they made and debated about. He realized if there was only one 100% official confirmed canon story, all of that would end. And the audience may not accept it. So The Box stayed locked, and it really was for the best that the contents were forgotten, for now. Perhaps, one day far in the future at the end of the series, Scott will finally show us what was in The Box. But not yet. Not before Five Nights at Freddy's has finished its final shift and collected its paycheck at the end of the week.
Diner, featuring a brown furry suit of a bear as a mascot. Henry would usually wear the suit, as they didn't have enough money to hire someone to do the job for a long time and they were studying at the time. William studied engineering and Henry business adminstration and communication. William met an unnamed woman, with whom he married and three years later had a boy challed Michael. They met in the court; William was being charged for murdering a child that allegedly was crying outside the Diner for being scared of Fredbear, the bear, and she was working selling hot-dogs in from of the building. (Btw, he was released because they didn't have evidences pointing it). It took them four years to actually achieve any success with the Diner, as they learnt from little Michael that Fredbear was boring. William them designed a new mascot: a yellow furry suit of a rabbit called Bonnie. The chemistry between both characters worked like black magic and the success rained on them like rain in a rainy day. The amount of money they got was so much, William used it to test his engineering skills, designing the first two Spring Lock suits: which were obviously Bonnie and Fredbear. The success increased. Freddy Fazbear's Pizza The Diner's success was so big, a company decided buy it and open a franchise around it. Hanry and William sold it, seeing a whole lot of profit coming from it, but there was a catch: the company used sneaky legal actions that allowed them to have the diner 100% under their possession, erasing Henry's and Michael's name from it. The company then opened Fazbear's Entertainment to take care of everything. William was so pissed because of this he cut any relationship with anyone involved with the franchise. Henry, on the other hand, didn't know any other thing to do, so he asked for a job; he became Phone Guy. FFP opened in 1973, and featured four furry suits of animals: Freddy Fazbear, a recolour of Bonnie, Chica and Foxy The Pirate. This made William even more pissed when he learnt they made four animatronics without him. He started planning his revenge. Btw, the Diner was still opened - as a sister location for FFP. The Origin of Purple Guy In 1976 William had twins: a little blonde girl and a little brunette boy. He started to teach Michael to take care of them, because "Daddy won't be around forever". During his free time, William started designing and projecting new robots (he hated the name "animatronics") and plans for his own company: Afton Robotics. But he had another plan under his sleeve: ruin FFP from the inside. He disguised himself as Dave Miller and started working applied for day time security guard at FFP. As he was always wearing purple - the uniform's colour - and usually hid in the shadows to stay out of sight of anyone who might recognize him, he was nicknamed by every child as "The Purple Guy". During this time, in 1980, he did his evil plan: using the Spring Bonnie suit he built years earlier, he lured five children to a back room, murdered them and hid inside the body of the animatronics. In case you're wondering what he did with the fifth one, he obviously hid it inside a spare Freddy suit he then painted yellow, duh. Fortunately for Billy, they actually caught Henry instead of him, as one of the cameras caught him walking around in one of the suits. He got out sometime later, as they managed to prove he had some mental disabilities and had a fixation with wearing the suits around, and had no violent behaviour. But Dave? Well, he was fired when FFP closed. Circus Baby With the help of the money he got from selling the children's organs in the black market, William opened Afton Robotics and had everything ready to open his own kid-friendly restaurant: Circus Baby's Pizza World. The problem is that he got a new hobby, and this where his hill went down. He liked so much the idea of killing children and the profit he could get from selling their organs - healthy children organs are way more valuable than adults' -, he made special alterations in his robots, turning them into kid-kidnapping and killing machines. The problem is that, in 1982, he accidently let his daughter get close to Baby when he wasn't looking; and Baby killed her. He knew he was the one to blame, but he actually blamed Michael for this, saying that he, as the older brother, should've protected her. Part 2: 30 likes
I think that Glitchtrap is a merge of two (Spiritual broken remains of William as a core and Mimic as skeleton.), same as Springtrap is a merge of two (William and Spring Bonnie). And after Gregory and Vanessa destroy the virus, all that remains is Mimic. (This is why his eyes are different from Burntrap and he removes William remains).
Addition to 29:00 could be that Shadow Freddy looks more animatronic compared to RXQ. RXQ is just a black, round silhouette of Toy Bonnie with no shading(initially, but even in AR, he's just shiny, kinda); a pure void that gets expanded upon in the Hide & Seek art, growing more chaotic. Shadow Freddy to Nightmare is similar. Not just "more teeth," but sharper teeth like in the H&S art. Nightmare is ripped and torn and withered, with his endo being a defining feature, while Shadow Freddy, again, has visible endoskeleton parts and wires in his design.
I think the thing with the Dave name is that when we solved Cassidy we were using simple ways to solve things at the time with a lot of stretching as well as context clues. Then we jump to now when people realize it has been solved using methods from long ago with simple and stretching if you want to call it that as well as context clues when we have been using complex and hard to solve methods for awhile now on new puzzles. People want to believe it has to be harder than that. While we forget this was made when it was using simple ways and stretching and context clues to solve.
thank you thank you thank you thank you! For the longest time I had this idea that there should be some kind of indicator on the screen for whenever something being said is a fact or an opinion/speculation. People so often misinterpret someone's opinions as facts and so this would go a long way in improving the general discourse. This should be standard for any theory video, honestly.
I have a theory that might be bad but I think that it works. What if the box in fnaf 4 has the foxy mask that Michael wore when Dave (the crying child) died? If you want I can explain why I think that.
@spookyisdead3449 For me the line "Some thing's are better forgotten, for now" is the biggest clue because that sort of line is commonly used for thing's that remind the person of their mistake or sin. If we used that type of explanation the Foxy mask that he wore fits the explanation pretty Well. Because for him it reminded him of when he put his brother on fredbear's mouth. We also know we play as Michael in fnaf 4, that who probably said the line and saw the box was Michael himself. It's probably a Bad theory, but for me it fits and probably is what originally was before the changes in the future.Thank You for your time and sorry for the Bad grammar
@@spookyisdead3449 Yeah i don't know either, is that when they were talking about the box that thought came and for me it Made somewhat sense because it wasn't far off from the books and games.
Most troubling thing about fnaf is just that Scott blended a multiverse of canon into a not-that-good of a narrative after all. Even if being cryptic was its greatest strenght, its also an annoying weakness. I much prefer the way some theorists, fancreators and analogue horror creators tell their own stories through fnaf and the genre it created because at least they try to be concise. And yet here i am watching a 4h theory compilation, sometimes it really is about the community. Fnaf has made me insane but at least i know youre all more insane than me. Great video.
There is actually a more neat way to make the fnaf 1 wage less problematic that being the January 1994 monthly labor review created by the bureau of labor and statistics had a section discussing changes to the minimum wage made in 1993 and on the second to last page of that section(page 51 I believe) on the lower left it brings up Utah and opens with a wage law saying companies can no longer underpay adult learners by 25 cents
Also the stuff in the log book about reflecting things scream crying child like "reflect on the HAPPIEST DAY in your life" & "reflect on the meaning of your dreams" aka thr nightmares created by your guilt from getting your brother killed Also with do you have dreams given this is CC we're talking about asking that question would remind him of his own nightmares prompting the response "I'm scared" so that even more evidence as a traumatized boy such as himself would probably have triggers & respond in odd ways to questions
Just another theory, but in my opinion, I feel like it makes sense if you reverse the questions like the order because perhaps it could be when Dave is first becomes a ghost
I find it hilarious that most if not all the lore stuff from the 24hr video is only 3 hours lol. I watched the entire 24hr video but thanks for condensing the lore stuff into it's own thing for people that only wanted lore stuff and not game info and other details.
It's always weird to me when people say that andrew is the vengeful spirit and then tie him to golden freddy, because in the books he has no ties to golden freddy at all and he doesn't even move any part on the body of the stitch wraith. Also this ignores the existance jake being there. So like does the stitch wraith and jake by proxy not actually exist, and if they do that would also mean that the afton amalgamation was just out here considering the conclusion of that story. you can't just have half of a dual protagonist story matter in the long run, even if Andrew is alone by the time of the man in room 1280 it still means that Jake did infact exist and do something, and yet with andrew being the vengeful spirit it feels like most lessen his impact. Last question that this would bring up, umm who the f*** is Elenor i now she supposed to be an Elizabeth stand in for the books, but Andrew just exist in the games why wouldn't she considering how important she is to the fazbear frights stories.
1:35:05 If Mike and his friends are that young in 83, that would make Mike like 16 in FNAF 2, meaning that he got scooped in like early 1987, also meaning that his voice in SL (the whole I'm going to come find you) us the voice of a 16 year old💀💀
haven't started the video but i'm watching just to make sure i know everything. will honestly be disappointed if i learn something cuz i already watched an 8 hour long fnaf lore video so this 4 hour one better be good
I Normally don't even touch the comment section bud god damn, what a good video, you did a wonderful job, imma probably watch it a lot of times, wash clothes to it, sleep to it, eat to it, damn, thanks for this work of art ❤
this is really interesting, because to me at least, the more biased theories are often easier to believe, and i think thats usually a good sign that theyre almost there, but its a little too convenient
kinda crazy this got almost half the amount of views of the 24 hour vid in 2 days, makes me a lil sad because you put so much work into the 24 hour vid.
Is it possible that retcon that Scot was talking about is that originally Golden Freddy was supposed to do the bite of 87, and then to do only a bite of 83 to Dave, and he said it was seemless because everyone has separated it...
Tbh speaking of death order, I think the death order goes like this: Elizabeth, Crying child and the Charlie. I believe they somehow all died on the same year and that CB pizza world was also made in 1983 as well. I also think that the Fnaf 4 nightmares were not Mikes but actually the Crying Childs made by William after his sister died to keep him away from the animatronics.
Golden Freddy was called "yellow bear" in the original game files. And in Into The Pit, the bunny is called "yellow rabbit" (This might be absolutely obvious thing to say xd but can it being used as some evidence for those two?)
It makes sense the crying child and Mike went through the experiments, likely Elizabeth too so they would stay away from the Funtimes but obviously that didn’t work for her
SUBSCRIBE! If you enjoyed go watch the FULL guide to EVERYTHING in FNAF: th-cam.com/video/_BohC_Yo9RU/w-d-xo.html
If you're wondering why I uploaded this, head over to my community post - explains it pretty well! :P
Merry Christmas, have a happy new year, and I'll see you all next year for brand new content! :D
No way you just uploaded a 24 hour video and then 3 uploads later a 4 hour video YOU ARE INCREDIBLE!!!!!!!!!
I think it’s just part of the 24 hour long one
It's just a cut down version of the 24 hour video, but still impressive nonetheless!
9:07 Concerning the discrepancy between "new summer job" and the November Paycheck, I remember Matpat mentioning that both those phone calls were pre-recorded training tapes. They were recorded in the summer for new hires at the time, and no one bothered to change or update them later down the line. You are never in a live conversation with the Phone Guy.
I kind of like the idea that fnaf 2 was supposed to open in summer but due to the withereds essentially being scrapped, they pushed it back
If Fnaf ever does end Scott should make a Final Guide Book that tells us the Full Story of Fnaf along with all the theory’s that people got Right and Wrong over the Years along with a Complete Timeline.
Or maybe Scott could make an Animated Series that Combines Lore Elements from the Games - Books and Movies into while adjusting certain things and adding new stuff to make 1 complete Timeline.
I like those ideas! Especially the first
And me thinking I was the only one with that idea. Once Scott retires for good, because one day he will have to, I hope he gives us the story with everything we got right, and wrong, and what could've happened different (looking at you fnaf4 box)
yeah honestly whenever he decides to "finish" FNAF for good, he should make a whole full novel series on the whole story from start to end
@@HyperDroid this dude ain't going to let the series die. He's essentially feeding off the hype train which is why there's another aspect of the lore to unpack that literally makes no sense. the mimic is ridiculous.
Coffee table book that compiles the whole FNAF Fever LOL
absolutely PEAK upload!! 🎉
peak recognises peak 🤝
Wild that FNAF is over a decade old now
literally crazy it's been 10 whole years and counting, couldn't have guessed it'd still be going a decade later
Still with an above average hype too!
Being honest, I've never liked the fact that there were another 5 dead children besides the ones from the MCI that NEVER get any resolution. Like, the MCI kids get gravestones with their names on them, and the DCI kids get... maybe a reference in the Happiest Day minigame? IDK, I feel like they should have gotten something.
I think that's because they're really not important to the overall narrative. If they are in the toy animatronics,then they got scrapped,if not then they're not important.
We don't even know the names of these kids or what gender they are,that's how irreverent they are.
I get that, they're just exclusive to the second game, their stories start and then end in the same game (once being dismantled) so it just seems like they're not that important when really it's just because their stories are done
This is why I prefer someone else interpretation of the timeline (John)
He speculated that because the children are killed but NOT stuffed into any suits, and simply left in the open, this means their souls are not bound to anything and can move on naturally.
The reason the toys act up is because the old animatronics were being used for spare parts and service for the toy animatronics. Thus infusing the toy animatronics with a part of the remnant composing the withered scraps.
When they got scrapped, the parts were then used to refurbish the withereds and the plastic shells were discarded.
@@X-SPONGED adding on to that, they wernt ever missing, so in universe their families wouldve been able to give them a proper burial/funural etc. so while it was a tragedy they didnt need closure, unlike the MCI who did need closure.
53:00 The Biggest Issue With Mike Being The "Vengeful Spirit" Is That Said Spirit Also Goes By "The One You Should Have Not Killed" And Michael Only Died By Elizabeth/Ennard (Technically) And Burned To Deatg By Henry In FNAF6, William Never Directly Killed Michael, Meaning That He's Not "The One You Should Not Have Killed/Vengeful Spirit"
agreed. I recommend you go watch John Funaff’s timeline video if you haven’t, it is another very good interpretation of the lore
I also just think it's stupid story wise. Their video was really well made, the theory not so much
they explained that in their video by saying William knew the animatronics would confuse Mike for himself, and knew that they wanted to kill him, thus knowingly sending Mike into a deathtrap without really caring if he lived through it and basically causing his death despite not having to physically kill him
@DragoBot It still doesn't make sense as Michael only wanted to end William's rein of terror. Once he knew William was going to die in the fire, he would have been at peace that William could no longer hurt anybody else.
Didn't expect to see myself in dis video again lol, caught me by surprise! But I appreciate a shorter version of the supreme guide focused on da lore. I've kinda forgotten a lot of it, so having dis was definitely a nice refresher! Keep up the great work bro!! :D
thank you! thanks for being apart of it! :D
WOW… unexpected surprise… WOW… with everything you do I’m afraid now Mark has a big competition for “King” title! Thank you HYPER!!!! 🎉🎉🎉
THANK YOU :))))
Crying child being named Dave actually made too much sense I’m honestly on board with this 1:46:09
The fact no one talking abt this Dave thing is crazy. Blew my mind
DAVID
I actually appreciate all the effort put into this by everyone involved, and I also find the "bias switch" really cool and a very respectable detail, because a lot of people like to actually just claim all their theories as fact without really explaining the other options. I like all the different theories put into this, too, because it allows viewers to decide what they might think is the right answer without forcing them to agree with everything that one person might think is true. So cool!
I just finished the 24 hour videos yesterday. What timing.
well I guess you're already set then 😅
5:43 It's actually the opposite; it makes it makes it taking place AFTER 2017 extremely unlikely/impossible.
@Luokeyo when using the 1993 date like the video itself shows this statement is false, it all depends on when you think FNAF 1 takes place, if you use 1993 as the date the coupons come from then it's indeed impossible to take place during or before 2017 since that'll be $26 instead, if you use 1992 then yes it's the other way around
I state all over the video 1993 is what I'm using
@@HyperDroid Good point, I semi retract my statement
Ooooo I can now watch this and take a break from my third rewatch of the supreme guide. It truly was the one thing that got me through finals
third rewatch is INSANE, thank you sm! :D
Bro did you sleep throughout the video or did you just watch the 24 hour video without sleep 💀🤔
@shadow_afton1 oh no, i refuse to watch it asleep. but i do have a fractured foot so ive got the time
Hyperdroid: Everyone put in a brief summary of your best theory.
Also Hyperdroid: I'm putting the deluxe director's cut of the Dave theory in the middle of this. Stop calling him crying child damnit!
18:05, the answer is simple: If these shadow animatronics are results of the springlock failures, shadow bonnie can STILL be that despite his model, because it's extremely easy to just think "scott had no design for springbonnie yet so he used the closest thing he had". Same reason why "Golden Freddy" (Fredbear) doesn't look like a different animatronic at all and instead is just a recolored freddy
That's been my reasoning as to why Shadow Bonnie resembles Toy Bonnie more than Springtrap, too.
His appearances in FNAF 3 (especially in his minigame) still make me think he's supposed to be more like Springtrap than Toy Bonnie.
I've loved the FNAF franchise since I was 12 years old, but has anybody else considered that Scott Cawthon is probably just a bad story teller and may not have a plan at all? The story is covered with plot holes, the games have been hit or miss since help wanted having seemingly lost their soul, up until very recently all of the books were so inconsistent that we are constantly debating there canonicity, and since game four the entire community hasnt been able to find a single theory the can be confirmed as the story or is a story valid enough to be accepted by the majority that wasn't later disproven. I'm beginning to think that Markiplier, Matpat, the theorist community and the fact that the games are unsolvable are the only reason these games sell at all. I'll stay for the theories but I've given up on the story entirely
Fully agree. Scott's style of story telling is not conducive to long elaborate plots.
@lancelux To be fair, no one can plan a decade ahead. There have been a lot of ganes coming out in that time. They still make sense, but he and Steelwool keep stuff vague on our purpose.
@user-fe8gx3ie5v That fairness comes only if steel wool is given all of the necessary information regarding exactly what the game should be (Steel wool went on to say they were giving a vague idea), if there was a complete and concise story that they were trying to tell without major dialogue and information being cut from security breach (The main lore drop of the steel wool games), and if the lore being given in the relevant book series cannon or not answers the question we have regarding the flaws in the games. And to the idea that no one can write a decade ahead, major writing tip "You don't start telling a story if you don't know how it should end". You don't need to plan ten years ahead, but you need to plan for the end of your story.
this deserves more popularity, love your videos. keep going!!!!
OMG nearly 4 hours? I am SO stoked.
PEAK
Why is no one talking about the cheeky single frame text at 15:10 only to realise it’s just the “these are my ideas on the lore”? @HyperDroid had me looking into the super deep one frame clue to realise it’s that 😂.
i love that fnaf keeps consistently giving me more and more video essays to listen to, like yes please. i am SEATED🧎. keep feeding me more and more things to think about when it comes to this series, i love rotating each fnaf addition (movie, books, games) in my head like it’s in a microwave. 😌(i love being fed sm things & being able to have almost an infinite amount of videos to binge about this series🫶🫶)
Yay I can finally watch a whole Hyper video!
HYPE
hyperdroid is the most underrated fnaf youtuber imo peak vids
FNAF fans seem to really have low standards.
@@user-fe8gx3ie5v"how dare you like this youtuber" ahh 💀unnecessarily rude comment lmao
@kennydiedagain8275 It's a based take.
@@user-fe8gx3ie5v im not sure you know what *based* means lol
@@kennydiedagain8275 thanks for defending me
The award for most dedicated FNAF theorist of 2024 goes to HyperDroid 🏆🎉
more coming 2025 get hyper 🙏
Do..... do you sleep?
no, another hour video coming next
"I don't need Sleep I need answers"
Hyper deprived of sleep or something idk
Creators be like "Sleep? What's that?"
No need. The only necessity is LOOOOOOOORRRE
watching this as if i haven’t consume hours of fnaf lore content every single day for the past 6 years
Regarding what Scott said about the box the first time in his post, I think he wasn't talking so much on *what's* in the box, but *how* the box tells the story. He said that what's in the box is "The pieces put together."
That reads as the full story of the games clearly laid out for us like a fully pieced together jigsaw puzzle.
"But would the community accept it that way?"
"that way" being the aforementioned how.
And I can see why he would be so hesitant.
The majority of FNAF's appeal is its mystery and the fan base putting their heads together to solve it. Would we as a community really have accepted the story just being told to us when we already get so much fun figuring it out ourselves?
I particularly love how Scott practically gushes over how the fandom figured out his story for the first 3 games.
It shows a lot of love that Scott not only for his craft but his fans as well.
i personally think that when the crying child responds "i can hear sounds" it means that he can sometimes hear sounds or memories of the plush talking to him but he knows its not the fredbear plush
I like the theory that the reason that Michaels last name is Schmidt is because he is using his mothers maiden name instead of Afton. Its possible that his parents were divorced, which explains why William can build such elaborate things without a functional adult asking questions.
HYPER DROID, YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY INSANE. Thanks for this little Christmas surprise.
Merry Christmas!
Scott has beautifully mastered “flying by the seat of my pants” and it’s amazing 😂
I can’t wait to watch the rest of the video! This seems like so much hard work and it’s going to be great to listen throughout the day! Sad to see the recent up and coming FNAF theorist FuhNaff isn’t here 😭 we love John
thanks so much, I appreciate it! and yes he and others were asked but unfortunately were busy! :)
@@HyperDroidI got to the point of the video where he was mentioned! So everyone is here! (Insert Smash Ultimate theme here)
Your video is amazing though, I’m still just half way through it. As an adult fan of fnaf since it started, your video is such a treat!! Covering damn near everything!! You’ve gotten a new subscriber my friend!!
I LOVE to see ryetoast around
facts ryetoast is the best
1:21:57 You know, I always had this wild theory that the mask we give to Roxy is an old animatronic mask. Considering that they bothered to give an explanation as to why Roxy looks different and the fact that at the back of the wrench we see a code that links back to a Fredbear’s Family Diner mini game makes me believe that this mask belongs to an animatronic we’ll encounter in SOTM. What animatronic specifically I’m not sure though it would be wild if it turned out to be Fredbear’s mask.
3:38:53 what did you just call me!
jokes aside, this is incredibly impressive and i appreciate the thought and detail put into it! a few of my personal ideas were changed
I don't understand why people would say that a book character like Andrew exists in the games, like, what would that even add? We already have Cassidy, who would fill the exact same role, why bring in a single book character and not all the others too?
NOT YOU JUST DROPPING THIS MASTERPIECE OF A VIDEO OUT OF NOWHERE
Been a busy year for you!
next year is gonna be 100x this...
I've got a stupid theory: FNAF 4 actually took place in 1987 and we were vastly overthinking it. The main proof of it being 1983 is the date on the TV, right? But here's the thing. Go turn on your TV right now, flip through the channels, and tell me how many of the shows you find on were made this year. The show on the TV could have just been a re-run. I think the game is in 1987 and only the show is from 1983. Evidence: Elizabeth's room has a mangle. Mangle was introduced in FNAF 2, which is in 1987. The Chica toy the girl has is missing a beak. Scott asked us why the toy would be missing its beak, right? Easy. Toy Chica in FNAF 2 is missing her beak, and FNAF 2 is in 1987. Why were Mangle and Toy Chica in this game? Quote from that post from Scott: "I guess most people assumed that I filled the game with random easter eggs this time. I didn't." The Mangle specifically is often times just ignored as a sort of easter egg. Scott was straight up telling us it's not an easter egg, it's important. And that's not even accounting for the bite. Maybe it WAS meant to be the bite of '87 after all. It also explains the hospital equipment. Crying Child was hospitalized after the bite and in critical condition, but he DID survive otherwise there wouldn't be any medical equipment (you wouldn't put a corpse on life support, after all). And of course, in FNAF 1, Phone Guy says the one who got bitten survived. But we all assumed it was 1983, hence why Scott said "No one, not a single person, found the pieces. The story remains completely hidden." We vastly overthought everything, and the simple answer was the right one all along.
WAS.
Remember how Scott also said that something got retconned due to a contradiction and he doesn't think anyone noticed? What if that was this? What if FNAF 4 WAS originally in 1987, but we all agreed on 1983, and Scott retconned it to be 1983 after the fact. There has since been a bunch of evidence proving it to be 1983 so that's now the correct answer, but what if we all got it wrong originally and that convinced Scott into changing the answer for us because we overlooked the obvious part of the bite in the game being THE bite? "But the bigger question is - would the community accept it that way?" We decided on our answer, and if we were proven wrong, we may not have accepted it or been happy about it because it was TOO obvious. "The fact that the pieces have remained elusive this time strikes me as incredible" could be he was surprised we didn't take the obvious answer. Hell, maybe he liked our answer of 1983 better, which is why he called it "special, a fitting conclusion in some ways" and maybe "some things are best left forgotten" is referring to this whole theory. Maybe it's best that we forget all the evidence pointing to 1987 and just go with 1983 from now on. Forever.
This is also why the contents of the box changed. "It's for that very reason. It's because of what I was intending that game to be when it happened, and then after the reaction of it, I need to craft this into something better for the people who see this as important." Also, FNAF 4 being in 1987 doesn't include dream theory.
I mean true with the TV show point. I know episodes of Breaking Bad and The Walking Dead from the 2000s and 2010s are on AMC. Episodes of Frasier and Cheers are on TV.
Evad? Dave?
Edit: Damn it I should have waited a couple minutes before commenting!
I had never really believed crying child was Dave until now, you explained it so well. And having Dave being found in the foxy grid works well cause it's tying CC back to Michael his brother the one who accidentally killed him whilst wearing a foxy mask. Idk why that just clicks so well in my mind for me.
Yooo Hyperdroid and Fuhnaf out there crushing it 🔥
YOU ALL KEEP GETTING PEAK CONTENT
I think the reason FNAF lore is so incomplete and convoluted is because it's meant to be a pick-and-choose-your-own-headcanon kind of thing. Like looking at a rainbow, everyone who sees the story of FNAF will have their own unique interpretation of it through their eyes. There are some basic canonical "facts" in the story, like how a rainbow always has the same colors in it, but since no person is exactly the same as another and we can't see through each other's eyes, any interpretation someone makes is still technically unique to them. The "base story" is just the bare endoskeleton, and we can add the outer plastic, cloth, or fur, fangs and claws, or cheerful smiles, rosy cheeks, etc. to it to create our own killer animatronic. There are a multitude of pieces that can all lead in different directions or point to different truths, and no single ending is necessarily the "true" one. We are free to choose which pieces we use and arrange them as we please. Just like Mangle. Just like Ultimate Custom Night. Just like the recent interactive novels. Just like the different endings in the games.
Maybe, at one point, The Box contained the official, canonical lore of FNAF: "the pieces put together". But then, Scott saw all the theories, all the mystery, all the engagement and love his fans poured into trying to figure it out on their own, and all the million different interpretations they made and debated about. He realized if there was only one 100% official confirmed canon story, all of that would end. And the audience may not accept it. So The Box stayed locked, and it really was for the best that the contents were forgotten, for now. Perhaps, one day far in the future at the end of the series, Scott will finally show us what was in The Box. But not yet. Not before Five Nights at Freddy's has finished its final shift and collected its paycheck at the end of the week.
Diner, featuring a brown furry suit of a bear as a mascot. Henry would usually wear the suit, as they didn't have enough money to hire someone to do the job for a long time and they were studying at the time. William studied engineering and Henry business adminstration and communication.
William met an unnamed woman, with whom he married and three years later had a boy challed Michael. They met in the court; William was being charged for murdering a child that allegedly was crying outside the Diner for being scared of Fredbear, the bear, and she was working selling hot-dogs in from of the building. (Btw, he was released because they didn't have evidences pointing it).
It took them four years to actually achieve any success with the Diner, as they learnt from little Michael that Fredbear was boring. William them designed a new mascot: a yellow furry suit of a rabbit called Bonnie. The chemistry between both characters worked like black magic and the success rained on them like rain in a rainy day.
The amount of money they got was so much, William used it to test his engineering skills, designing the first two Spring Lock suits: which were obviously Bonnie and Fredbear. The success increased.
Freddy Fazbear's Pizza
The Diner's success was so big, a company decided buy it and open a franchise around it. Hanry and William sold it, seeing a whole lot of profit coming from it, but there was a catch: the company used sneaky legal actions that allowed them to have the diner 100% under their possession, erasing Henry's and Michael's name from it. The company then opened Fazbear's Entertainment to take care of everything.
William was so pissed because of this he cut any relationship with anyone involved with the franchise. Henry, on the other hand, didn't know any other thing to do, so he asked for a job; he became Phone Guy.
FFP opened in 1973, and featured four furry suits of animals: Freddy Fazbear, a recolour of Bonnie, Chica and Foxy The Pirate. This made William even more pissed when he learnt they made four animatronics without him. He started planning his revenge.
Btw, the Diner was still opened - as a sister location for FFP.
The Origin of Purple Guy
In 1976 William had twins: a little blonde girl and a little brunette boy. He started to teach Michael to take care of them, because "Daddy won't be around forever".
During his free time, William started designing and projecting new robots (he hated the name "animatronics") and plans for his own company: Afton Robotics. But he had another plan under his sleeve: ruin FFP from the inside.
He disguised himself as Dave Miller and started working applied for day time security guard at FFP. As he was always wearing purple - the uniform's colour - and usually hid in the shadows to stay out of sight of anyone who might recognize him, he was nicknamed by every child as "The Purple Guy".
During this time, in 1980, he did his evil plan: using the Spring Bonnie suit he built years earlier, he lured five children to a back room, murdered them and hid inside the body of the animatronics. In case you're wondering what he did with the fifth one, he obviously hid it inside a spare Freddy suit he then painted yellow, duh.
Fortunately for Billy, they actually caught Henry instead of him, as one of the cameras caught him walking around in one of the suits. He got out sometime later, as they managed to prove he had some mental disabilities and had a fixation with wearing the suits around, and had no violent behaviour.
But Dave? Well, he was fired when FFP closed.
Circus Baby
With the help of the money he got from selling the children's organs in the black market, William opened Afton Robotics and had everything ready to open his own kid-friendly restaurant: Circus Baby's Pizza World. The problem is that he got a new hobby, and this where his hill went down.
He liked so much the idea of killing children and the profit he could get from selling their organs - healthy children organs are way more valuable than adults' -, he made special alterations in his robots, turning them into kid-kidnapping and killing machines.
The problem is that, in 1982, he accidently let his daughter get close to Baby when he wasn't looking; and Baby killed her. He knew he was the one to blame, but he actually blamed Michael for this, saying that he, as the older brother, should've protected her.
Part 2: 30 likes
This is the type of content I appreciate. Thank you droid.
Hyper droid literally is a machine he makes amazing videos and is still REALLY underrated.
thank you! :)
literally finished the 24hr one wednesday, this was right on time🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
then you're set 🫡 thanks for watching it!
YIPPEE!! long fnaf videos are my favorite thing ever🎉
HYPE
I think that Glitchtrap is a merge of two (Spiritual broken remains of William as a core and Mimic as skeleton.), same as Springtrap is a merge of two (William and Spring Bonnie). And after Gregory and Vanessa destroy the virus, all that remains is Mimic. (This is why his eyes are different from Burntrap and he removes William remains).
Wait a second, I had no idea it was gonna come out today! I'm seated!!!
HYPE
A passenger on a 2 hour drive. This’ll do just well thank you.
peak!
@ goat
jeez man youve been working hard 🙏
🙏
Addition to 29:00 could be that Shadow Freddy looks more animatronic compared to RXQ. RXQ is just a black, round silhouette of Toy Bonnie with no shading(initially, but even in AR, he's just shiny, kinda); a pure void that gets expanded upon in the Hide & Seek art, growing more chaotic. Shadow Freddy to Nightmare is similar. Not just "more teeth," but sharper teeth like in the H&S art. Nightmare is ripped and torn and withered, with his endo being a defining feature, while Shadow Freddy, again, has visible endoskeleton parts and wires in his design.
thank u sm for this i have been hearing things out of chronological order for all my life
I think the thing with the Dave name is that when we solved Cassidy we were using simple ways to solve things at the time with a lot of stretching as well as context clues. Then we jump to now when people realize it has been solved using methods from long ago with simple and stretching if you want to call it that as well as context clues when we have been using complex and hard to solve methods for awhile now on new puzzles. People want to believe it has to be harder than that. While we forget this was made when it was using simple ways and stretching and context clues to solve.
thank you thank you thank you thank you! For the longest time I had this idea that there should be some kind of indicator on the screen for whenever something being said is a fact or an opinion/speculation. People so often misinterpret someone's opinions as facts and so this would go a long way in improving the general discourse. This should be standard for any theory video, honestly.
You are insane for this & I love it:))
How did you put out multiple hour long videos? And they're good!
another one coming right up
Seriously, I think the Dave solution is absolute genius and it works so well !!!
I have a theory that might be bad but I think that it works. What if the box in fnaf 4 has the foxy mask that Michael wore when Dave (the crying child) died? If you want I can explain why I think that.
Sure.
@spookyisdead3449 For me the line "Some thing's are better forgotten, for now" is the biggest clue because that sort of line is commonly used for thing's that remind the person of their mistake or sin. If we used that type of explanation the Foxy mask that he wore fits the explanation pretty Well. Because for him it reminded him of when he put his brother on fredbear's mouth. We also know we play as Michael in fnaf 4, that who probably said the line and saw the box was Michael himself. It's probably a Bad theory, but for me it fits and probably is what originally was before the changes in the future.Thank You for your time and sorry for the Bad grammar
You're welcome it's alright grammar wise. I don't know if your theory is correct, but it could be worth looking into.
@@spookyisdead3449 Yeah i don't know either, is that when they were talking about the box that thought came and for me it Made somewhat sense because it wasn't far off from the books and games.
great video. l am suprised how this one didn't end up being bigger than the previous one
i fuckinf screamed when i heard gibis voice
Same XD
thanks for this, perfect video to fall asleep to
Most troubling thing about fnaf is just that Scott blended a multiverse of canon into a not-that-good of a narrative after all. Even if being cryptic was its greatest strenght, its also an annoying weakness.
I much prefer the way some theorists, fancreators and analogue horror creators tell their own stories through fnaf and the genre it created because at least they try to be concise.
And yet here i am watching a 4h theory compilation, sometimes it really is about the community. Fnaf has made me insane but at least i know youre all more insane than me. Great video.
PEAKKKKK UPLOADDDDDDDDDD
PEAKKKKK
1:12:04 Ah Yes, Obito And Tobi Are Different People Because They Both Have Different Voice Actors
THREE HOURS???? OH THIS IS A MOVIE MARATHON NOW WITH FUHNAFF’S VIDS
peak after peak
@ OMG HI??? 👋👋👋
There is actually a more neat way to make the fnaf 1 wage less problematic that being the January 1994 monthly labor review created by the bureau of labor and statistics had a section discussing changes to the minimum wage made in 1993 and on the second to last page of that section(page 51 I believe) on the lower left it brings up Utah and opens with a wage law saying companies can no longer underpay adult learners by 25 cents
pfft love that its specifcally utah tho
Everyone is here!
the Avengers Endgame of FNAF theories
Nothing could have prepared me for solar sands to just appear. Literally best moment of the video for me
Also the stuff in the log book about reflecting things scream crying child like "reflect on the HAPPIEST DAY in your life" & "reflect on the meaning of your dreams" aka thr nightmares created by your guilt from getting your brother killed
Also with do you have dreams given this is CC we're talking about asking that question would remind him of his own nightmares prompting the response "I'm scared" so that even more evidence as a traumatized boy such as himself would probably have triggers & respond in odd ways to questions
3 hours and 47 minutes?? yeah im down 🍿🔥
W
Awesome video. What video is that where Matt kicks the log book?
Just another theory, but in my opinion, I feel like it makes sense if you reverse the questions like the order because perhaps it could be when Dave is first becomes a ghost
to this day, my ears perk up and i am filled with excitement every time i hear the new challenger approaching sound effect...fnaf world 2 when...
I find it hilarious that most if not all the lore stuff from the 24hr video is only 3 hours lol. I watched the entire 24hr video but thanks for condensing the lore stuff into it's own thing for people that only wanted lore stuff and not game info and other details.
It's always weird to me when people say that andrew is the vengeful spirit and then tie him to golden freddy, because in the books he has no ties to golden freddy at all and he doesn't even move any part on the body of the stitch wraith. Also this ignores the existance jake being there. So like does the stitch wraith and jake by proxy not actually exist, and if they do that would also mean that the afton amalgamation was just out here considering the conclusion of that story. you can't just have half of a dual protagonist story matter in the long run, even if Andrew is alone by the time of the man in room 1280 it still means that Jake did infact exist and do something, and yet with andrew being the vengeful spirit it feels like most lessen his impact. Last question that this would bring up, umm who the f*** is Elenor i now she supposed to be an Elizabeth stand in for the books, but Andrew just exist in the games why wouldn't she considering how important she is to the fazbear frights stories.
Did you forget? Inside the locked box was none other than the KING of Five Nights at Freddy’s himself. 😂😂😂
I love how the condensed version of this video is 4 hours long
LMAO
I feel Matt Pat's determination is the same on this channel
1:35:05 If Mike and his friends are that young in 83, that would make Mike like 16 in FNAF 2, meaning that he got scooped in like early 1987, also meaning that his voice in SL (the whole I'm going to come find you) us the voice of a 16 year old💀💀
haven't started the video but i'm watching just to make sure i know everything. will honestly be disappointed if i learn something cuz i already watched an 8 hour long fnaf lore video so this 4 hour one better be good
I Normally don't even touch the comment section bud god damn, what a good video, you did a wonderful job, imma probably watch it a lot of times, wash clothes to it, sleep to it, eat to it, damn, thanks for this work of art ❤
this made me very happy thank u
Don't forget that FNAF fits in autumn because it has that vibe
So who is the person with the Chica mask in the Bite of '83? Do we know?
Autoplay was on so woke up seeing i apparently listen to this video in my sleep (also explained why my phone was dead)
bro my brain started to tune this out when the list of theories kept going lol
this is really interesting, because to me at least, the more biased theories are often easier to believe, and i think thats usually a good sign that theyre almost there, but its a little too convenient
i like the frequent uploads🙂
2025 got a lot more coming
kinda crazy this got almost half the amount of views of the 24 hour vid in 2 days, makes me a lil sad because you put so much work into the 24 hour vid.
atleast you're still getting views off this though.
Is it possible that retcon that Scot was talking about is that originally Golden Freddy was supposed to do the bite of 87, and then to do only a bite of 83 to Dave, and he said it was seemless because everyone has separated it...
Tbh speaking of death order, I think the death order goes like this: Elizabeth, Crying child and the Charlie. I believe they somehow all died on the same year and that CB pizza world was also made in 1983 as well. I also think that the Fnaf 4 nightmares were not Mikes but actually the Crying Childs made by William after his sister died to keep him away from the animatronics.
FNAF is getting wayyy too relatable
Golden Freddy was called "yellow bear" in the original game files. And in Into The Pit, the bunny is called "yellow rabbit"
(This might be absolutely obvious thing to say xd but can it being used as some evidence for those two?)
so fucking psyched that you’re hitting EVERYTHING
It makes sense the crying child and Mike went through the experiments, likely Elizabeth too so they would stay away from the Funtimes but obviously that didn’t work for her
I'm being insane aren't I, watching a 4 hour video
no you're perfectly sane im sure
@HyperDroid the worst part is that this is not the first time I'm watching a 2+ hour video about fnaf. Great video btw