This model is all good as this woman is NOT advising the viewers (possible undecided shareholders) to vote YES or NO but simply giving a perspective. Most of the time (almost 90%) these MSM invite guests who are NOT the $TSLA shareholders and since they've no skin in the game, they doesn't care if the stock goes up or down after the vote. Then worst, they start advocating to VOTE AGAINST the pay package as I've seen multiple times on CNBC which is UNACCEPTABLE.
Misleading analysis. What's being decided on whether Elon Musk should be for work *already done*, when there is no legal obligation to do so. This isn't a package with new goals, new stipulations and benchmarks. Vote will probably fail.
Elon Musk should get a smaller pay package. Most of the valuation is driven by irrational hype driven by Musk to artificially inflate the stock price. A fair share price as a EV company is closer to 110
Here's the thing: you folks say this is for Elon's 2018 achievements, why didn't he asked for it in 2019, 2020, 2021, hell even 2022, but only bring this up in 2024? Please help me to understand.
It was a multi year agreement not sure if it had time constraints but here is the jist of it: The pay package, approved in 2018, itself is novel. Musk earns nothing unless the company hits performance milestones. Each time the company’s capitalization increases by $50 billion, Musk gets 1% of Tesla stock. The $56 billion comes from the company hitting all of the milestones and reaching $650 billion in capitalization - which Tesla did just a few years later.
Should contracts be honored? If a contract is not worth the paper we write them on then why have contracts? In my opinion Elon has earned every penny plus now that he has to go through all of this BS by unappreciative shareholders that have seen their investment 10X.
So if he made a contract that said he get to increase his ownership to 90% if he does a b c, and the people who approved the contract were all Elons friends, you aren’t bright to see the fraud and collusion.
@@andersriksson100 He took the company from 50b to over 600b now it sits at 500b because of this circus. He had no guarantees of salary unless he delivered, he did not take pay (technically he took 35k a year because CA law said he had to take a salary) for 6 years and he delivered on everything he promised. This was an agreement that 73% of the shareholders voted for and approved. The only reason it's a lot of money is because he delivered, he gets paid in shares of Tesla.
@@didier_777 If what you say is true and if you believe the Tesla hype is all based on Elon alone it still doesn't change what I said. And 56 billion US for 6 years is absurd any way you cut it. He hand picked the board to get this absurd deal, not in the best interest of the shareholders per se even if they have had great growth.
@@andersriksson100 the deal was 1% of the company for every 50 billion. You damn right that's a lot of money but it's comparable to what NVIDIA CEO is getting. It was an agreement, and now that he outperformed and made people more money than he said we would now we say no sorry we didn't actually think you were going to achieve the goals so we don't want to pay you.
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.15 (1/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TLBjiHvkKtE/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Full] 4 ต่อ 4 Celebrity EP.922 | 10 พ.ย. 67 | one31](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zmV5HRIxIBI/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm a retail investor and vote against it
This model is all good as this woman is NOT advising the viewers (possible undecided shareholders) to vote YES or NO but simply giving a perspective. Most of the time (almost 90%) these MSM invite guests who are NOT the $TSLA shareholders and since they've no skin in the game, they doesn't care if the stock goes up or down after the vote. Then worst, they start advocating to VOTE AGAINST the pay package as I've seen multiple times on CNBC which is UNACCEPTABLE.
India needs to buy EV from China,a country also with low vehicle standards, and let the BRICS play out, Mexico import tax 2025 ? Election,?
Misleading analysis. What's being decided on whether Elon Musk should be for work *already done*, when there is no legal obligation to do so. This isn't a package with new goals, new stipulations and benchmarks. Vote will probably fail.
Elon Musk should get a smaller pay package. Most of the valuation is driven by irrational hype driven by Musk to artificially inflate the stock price. A fair share price as a EV company is closer to 110
Only in America.
This happens only in America.
The man eats mushrooms in the morning then needs ketamine to go to sleep he is the 21st century Howard Hughes
Here's the thing: you folks say this is for Elon's 2018 achievements, why didn't he asked for it in 2019, 2020, 2021, hell even 2022, but only bring this up in 2024? Please help me to understand.
It was a multi year agreement not sure if it had time constraints but here is the jist of it: The pay package, approved in 2018, itself is novel. Musk earns nothing unless the company hits performance milestones. Each time the company’s capitalization increases by $50 billion, Musk gets 1% of Tesla stock. The $56 billion comes from the company hitting all of the milestones and reaching $650 billion in capitalization - which Tesla did just a few years later.
Should contracts be honored?
If a contract is not worth the paper we write them on then why have contracts? In my opinion Elon has earned every penny plus now that he has to go through all of this BS by unappreciative shareholders that have seen their investment 10X.
not illegal contracts
So if he made a contract that said he get to increase his ownership to 90% if he does a b c, and the people who approved the contract were all Elons friends, you aren’t bright to see the fraud and collusion.
How much wealth did Elon bring to his shareholders? Yes, he deserves every penny.
I’m voting Yes and Yes
Well you worked for me for 6 years or more but I don't think I should pay you...a dumocrat would say.
The hunger games begin.
I don't know about you but if you don't pay me for 6 years I'm not going to keep working for free.
There is a difference between beeing paid a fair salary and an absolutely absurd 56 billion package.
@@andersriksson100 He took the company from 50b to over 600b now it sits at 500b because of this circus.
He had no guarantees of salary unless he delivered, he did not take pay (technically he took 35k a year because CA law said he had to take a salary) for 6 years and he delivered on everything he promised. This was an agreement that 73% of the shareholders voted for and approved. The only reason it's a lot of money is because he delivered, he gets paid in shares of Tesla.
@@didier_777 If what you say is true and if you believe the Tesla hype is all based on Elon alone it still doesn't change what I said. And 56 billion US for 6 years is absurd any way you cut it. He hand picked the board to get this absurd deal, not in the best interest of the shareholders per se even if they have had great growth.
@@didier_777the problem is it was approved by his friends.
@@andersriksson100 the deal was 1% of the company for every 50 billion. You damn right that's a lot of money but it's comparable to what NVIDIA CEO is getting. It was an agreement, and now that he outperformed and made people more money than he said we would now we say no sorry we didn't actually think you were going to achieve the goals so we don't want to pay you.
Give him 99 percent of the shares!
Elon is a crook
I want to play with you
She is frigid