HYDRAULIC PRESS VS ORIGINAL AND FAKE SHOCKPROOF WATCHES

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.พ. 2022
  • Let's test the strength of the Cassio G-shock shockproof watch with a hydraulic press. Copy and original which is stronger
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 2.9K

  • @taimurdurani1692
    @taimurdurani1692 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9665

    According to the price of fake G-shock (12$) i think the watch is still worthy to buy because the watch has tolerated 157 kg of weight 😂

    • @ElitexEdits
      @ElitexEdits 2 ปีที่แล้ว +110

      Yaa

    • @surajsinha897
      @surajsinha897 2 ปีที่แล้ว +86

      Ysss🤣

    • @alpon6
      @alpon6 2 ปีที่แล้ว +283

      Approx 13 kg of tolerance per buck, damn this is great in fact

    • @LWIN729
      @LWIN729 2 ปีที่แล้ว +389

      I wanted this say this too. The fake one👍 is good enough for daily. G shock will shock your wallet too 😂😂

    • @ElitexEdits
      @ElitexEdits 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@LWIN729 haha ur right

  • @Sadhana-Vibhuti213
    @Sadhana-Vibhuti213 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1012

    Ziarex must be stopped at all costs. People are losing money since their mega clone watches started to be sold as originals on the aftermarket.

    • @tyroneuva-py1pg
      @tyroneuva-py1pg หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This person got a fake one

  • @motu-ki3el
    @motu-ki3el ปีที่แล้ว +2895

    What a crime to see a historic clock from the 70s smashed in an unprecedented test that proves that with enough pressure from a hydraulic machine, any clock breaks. That old and still working clock did not deserve to end like this.

    • @ThinhNguyenNow
      @ThinhNguyenNow ปีที่แล้ว +131

      It's a Russian watch, Vostok Komandirskie, same design as in the cold war but you can bike for

    • @BlueFalcata
      @BlueFalcata ปีที่แล้ว +139

      Science requires sacrifices

    • @Kriegerdammerung
      @Kriegerdammerung ปีที่แล้ว +112

      @@ThinhNguyenNow It was a Soviet watch, not Russian.

    • @Nikioko
      @Nikioko ปีที่แล้ว +9

      😥

    • @Nikioko
      @Nikioko ปีที่แล้ว +230

      @@ThinhNguyenNow It doesn't matter what it costs. Destroying a genuine watch is a crime.

  • @seahorse1171
    @seahorse1171 ปีที่แล้ว +558

    "Don't try this at home "
    Me slowly keeping back my hydraulic press in the pocket

    • @timetraveler9019
      @timetraveler9019 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Dark 🌚

    • @Bored_wreked
      @Bored_wreked ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lightless 🤭

    • @HarbingerOfDawN_
      @HarbingerOfDawN_ ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@timetraveler9019 bruh nothing's dark stop faking

    • @mevio4665
      @mevio4665 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you 😂😂

    • @ivanrovinov
      @ivanrovinov ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HarbingerOfDawN_ NoThInGs' LiGhT.....iTs OnLy ThE aBsEnCe Of DaRkNeSs!

  • @arnavaher2826
    @arnavaher2826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4731

    Ahh yes, a regular scenario where my arm goes under a hydraulic press. What a reliable watch

    • @menantumakawak
      @menantumakawak 2 ปีที่แล้ว +96

      Durability test

    • @marioelburro1492
      @marioelburro1492 2 ปีที่แล้ว +308

      You never know when someone kidnaps you and puts your arm under a hydraulic press😂 You might break your wrist but at least youll have a cool watch💀

    • @lucky_lol
      @lucky_lol 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@menantumakawak he is just kidding around lol
      (Nice username btw)

    • @lucky_lol
      @lucky_lol 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@marioelburro1492 chances of that are low but never zero

    • @evolution8662
      @evolution8662 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      The watch will survive the hydraulic press...... Not your arm......

  • @branimirantic3625
    @branimirantic3625 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1650

    Shock resistant does not mean crush resistant. It was build to resist G forces (therefore G-shock), not heavy weight.

    • @sccorpiongmr4742
      @sccorpiongmr4742 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      Exactaly what i thought

    • @julius12345ceaser
      @julius12345ceaser 2 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      Hence good structural strength to resists 157 and 350 Kg respectively.

    • @speedingdyno2702
      @speedingdyno2702 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Exactly g shock ka matlab hi gravitational shock jisse agar wo apse gir jaye to use kuch na hoo

    • @demonga9150
      @demonga9150 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah bro I was also thinking ths

    • @GOTTHEDAWGINME
      @GOTTHEDAWGINME 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      G forces are literally forces of gravity... What will gravity even do to a normal watch...

  • @nikosmarkos
    @nikosmarkos ปีที่แล้ว +694

    1:15 i like the fact that he gently passes the knife through the original glass and later on at 1:36 really pushes hard to create a scratch on the fake.

    • @mitulgoyal6533
      @mitulgoyal6533 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      true bro😂😂

    • @Anonymous_o
      @Anonymous_o ปีที่แล้ว +60

      Basically he wants to prove that fake is fake😂

    • @elvirareforma7970
      @elvirareforma7970 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      Actually,if it does not scratch it just slides and looks like your not putting any effort but when it scratches it burrows some of the blade bc thats a cutter, a very sharp blade it looks like your putting alot of effort.

    • @grrbrr5290
      @grrbrr5290 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      No the real one has a much smoother and harder surface than the fake soft one, hence the blade glides over and sinks in respectively

    • @theprodigy2653
      @theprodigy2653 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Was expecting it on the fake before he does. 🤣😅

  • @bigbuba5212
    @bigbuba5212 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    Whoever made the fake should start their own brand because that's a pretty solid watch for the price

    • @JandonGames
      @JandonGames 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      They already did. The brand name is SKMEI :-)

    • @riteshkashyap1468
      @riteshkashyap1468 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Oh is it urs 😂

  • @jamesieadams
    @jamesieadams 2 ปีที่แล้ว +747

    70’s watch featured a function that ejects the movement when it realises its in a hydraulic press. What you didn’t see off camera was the parachute deploy and the movement land safely on the ground.

    • @bhavishaysingh1374
      @bhavishaysingh1374 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Sir could you explain me more🙂

    • @AR-cy8je
      @AR-cy8je 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@bhavishaysingh1374 he's joking lmao

    • @user-ye9cl6eq5y
      @user-ye9cl6eq5y 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/HgyCNVD5EfE/w-d-xo.html

    • @yashrajpatel3502
      @yashrajpatel3502 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      😂😂😂

    • @kulrajsingh2017
      @kulrajsingh2017 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AR-cy8je i think he is joking as well or ge is dumb

  • @gabrielrey8258
    @gabrielrey8258 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1992

    The way he try to scratch the Original was so smoothest like he was touching his eyes 🤣🤣🤭 than Fake one 😂😂

  • @illmatic270
    @illmatic270 ปีที่แล้ว +223

    That scratch test was a joke.. 😂

    • @Sora_L1nx
      @Sora_L1nx ปีที่แล้ว +20

      lmao true. just lightly scratching the real while putting pressure on the fake one

    • @umacreanonoyt9477
      @umacreanonoyt9477 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Mineral crystal vz platic

    • @JM-ym8mm
      @JM-ym8mm ปีที่แล้ว +17

      He's being mindful of the blade. That is a Sapphire crystal, or at the very least mineral glass coated with Sapphire, meaning there's no amount of pushing down with a box cutter in your hand that's going to scratch it. Worst that could happen is that the blade slips and you end up hurting yourself.

    • @illmatic270
      @illmatic270 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@JM-ym8mm blah blah blah blah

    • @JM-ym8mm
      @JM-ym8mm ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@illmatic270 go to school kiddo 😜

  • @fromfareastindy8234
    @fromfareastindy8234 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I thought it was an impact resistance test, but it was a pressure resistance test.
    If you want to get a good score in the pressure resistance test, simply make the outer shell made of tough metal.
    G-Shock has a model with a titanium alloy outer shell, so I recommend you to use that for the test.
    However, being hard is not the same as being strong.

    • @hamdifouzai4713
      @hamdifouzai4713 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My 10€ Aliexpress watch has titanium alloy too...

    • @dennismikhailitsky3735
      @dennismikhailitsky3735 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@hamdifouzai4713 sorry to break it to you, but most likely it's aluminum, hence lightweight.

  • @grimmer2005
    @grimmer2005 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1821

    It is a bit painful to see nice fully working watches being destroyed like this xD

    • @user-jd7rt3dk5u
      @user-jd7rt3dk5u 2 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      Yes bro when we actually wanted to buy the watch 🤧

    • @gavinrabinowitz1255
      @gavinrabinowitz1255 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      I can assure you , when you make as much money from this channel as he does you won"t feel so bad destroying some watches !

    • @duckblock
      @duckblock 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Have you seen the one where also a guy with a hydraulic press destroyed a diamond?

    • @reezevlog
      @reezevlog 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yeah..just for the sake of collecting views n subscribers…..🤭

    • @anandhakrishnana.k.1559
      @anandhakrishnana.k.1559 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not Really 🚶

  • @nemesis91101
    @nemesis91101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +301

    I would have happily taken that old watch and I don't even collect them. Just sad to see a piece of history go.

    • @tomas6224
      @tomas6224 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@subhojitbiswas5824 yeah... metal vs plastics...

    • @tomas6224
      @tomas6224 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@subhojitbiswas5824 Just saying it is nonsense to put old watch in this comparison. Then he should put new metal watches as well..

    • @nemesis91101
      @nemesis91101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tomas6224 I think the old watch was fake too? If so then i dont care but if it was real...

    • @patrickriarchy6054
      @patrickriarchy6054 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      On e bay there are tons for under $50. Just search for Vostok.

    • @damyr
      @damyr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@nemesis91101 It's a Vostok Komandirski, a very cheap watch, pretty tough, but not very reliable and far from being precise.

  • @ryuzaki_ray
    @ryuzaki_ray ปีที่แล้ว +21

    As a watch enthusiast, it hurts while watching a nice piece of watches being destroyed.

    • @hamidjarchi8924
      @hamidjarchi8924 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I also felt heart shattered because they smashed to death

  • @alessandrozuffi5068
    @alessandrozuffi5068 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I have the same G-shock, it's a really nice watch and very reliable, as any Casio is. That being said it's a weird test because the G-shock line is built to resist falling, it has to be water proof, so they have to resist shocks and water infiltrations more than sustain weights. That poor vostok tho, it looked like it was running fast and probably wasn't worth the cost of servicing, but as a watch enthisiast it still breaks my heart to see it getting destroyed (I feel a little bad for the fake one too).

  • @user-mm6fb6jb6g
    @user-mm6fb6jb6g 2 ปีที่แล้ว +719

    It was later found out that the old Soviet watch was worn by Khrushchev, and was valued at about two million dollars.

  • @abhisheksarkar_neo
    @abhisheksarkar_neo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +148

    Love how the fake watch’s alarm started going off as soon as it started getting crushed! Like its a plea for help 😆

  • @CrispMan1
    @CrispMan1 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    1:28 bro gently scarped the original one and straight up put his whole body strength on the other two.

    • @monsterman6342
      @monsterman6342 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      He cannot scratch it with that metal knife. The knife just glides across the surface with whatever force you apply. It's due to the hardness of the glass. Original G-Shocks generally use Mineral glass and/or sapphire glass which comes second only to diamonds in terms of hardness. (It should be noted that hardness does not mean resistance to breaking rather hard substances are generally brittle.) You'll either need an object made up of diamond or sapphire itself to scratch the glass. I have tried scratching my G-Shock with knives and other metals which generally do nothing. But things were not the same when I tried it with sand. It got scratched with sand. (I looked it up and found that sand contains mixture of many minerals which includes sapphire and even diamonds in some cases) .
      My point is it's nearly impossible to scratch it that easily with metal. It's otherwise if you're applying force like a maniac to that little glass.

    • @aryanthakkar9206
      @aryanthakkar9206 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly

    • @Mr_Kuky_
      @Mr_Kuky_ ปีที่แล้ว

      I was looking for this comment xd it's obvious xd

  • @noisepuppet
    @noisepuppet 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The basic digital G-Shock square cost about $50 US, and after I finally bought one and wore it, I wondered what took me so long. These are fantastic tool watches and certainly more accurate than any Rolex. (Not a fair comparison, I realize.)

  • @unofficialgamer1884
    @unofficialgamer1884 2 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    Seeing him destroy the vintage watch almost gave me heart attack

    • @borbetomagus
      @borbetomagus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Admittedly, I've cringed when people did 'drop test' videos of products that are very desired, yet (at the time) were very hard to come by.
      This watch is still made, but with a different casing -- Vostok Watch Komandirskie 439072 for $40. Other 'Komandirskie' watches utilizing the same case -- 219123, 219179, 219452, etc. Vostok offers replacement parts, so one could probably piece together a close replica, if so desired. It's not certain if patina will occur as some of these 'brass' cases age.
      The acrylic crystal is a feature on the Vostok 'Amfibia' dive watches, as they flex and add protection while under heavy pressure -- /watch?v=FwNFy2A7rmU&t=377s
      One can use 'PolyWatch' to buff out any scratches that may occur while wearing watches with acrylic crystals.

    • @azeemjoyia640
      @azeemjoyia640 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was in the same stage when he first showed the vintage watch i was like what the hell bro who will did this with such ⌚

    • @loloutplays5232
      @loloutplays5232 ปีที่แล้ว

      You actually can buy this kind of watches from eastern europe from local people and they are cheap...

    • @mikemikeetoo9094
      @mikemikeetoo9094 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought the same it was a beautiful komandirskie watch

    • @nathancullen5073
      @nathancullen5073 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can't believe he destroyed an original g shock Casio

  • @prayagrajbhuyan9791
    @prayagrajbhuyan9791 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1034

    The 12$ one is only 10% of the original’s price, but took almost 50% of the weight the original one took. So certainly, I’ll go for the 12$ product because it is 90% cheaper but also 50% capable of the original one.

    • @kingsly1031
      @kingsly1031 2 ปีที่แล้ว +64

      It's not always price.

    • @armingamer5546
      @armingamer5546 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      Besides, who the hell can hold like +100kg on their wrist 😟

    • @rhezaedward
      @rhezaedward 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      have you calculated the durability and reliability percentage?

    • @dheerajmalviya
      @dheerajmalviya 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Hey Girl I Like Your Kitchen Romania ?

    • @victorbraga6572
      @victorbraga6572 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Yeah bro, because a hydraulic press test definitely show the entire value of a watch, thats what they're made for

  • @user-co7ze1do4g
    @user-co7ze1do4g 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Although I had doubts about buying a replica watch, gussl dispelled my doubts. The watch has an authentic look and feel.

  • @dr.charlesedwardflorendobr3952
    @dr.charlesedwardflorendobr3952 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm impressed! How did you keep the watches in place while they got pressed so hard?

  • @andriyzhuk8830
    @andriyzhuk8830 2 ปีที่แล้ว +212

    For $12 I'm pretty impressed.

    • @ayanbossyt7536
      @ayanbossyt7536 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Here in india we can get the same 12 dollar watch in just 1 dollar

    • @scaredmouse6643
      @scaredmouse6643 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@ayanbossyt7536 no ones giving you a watch in 75₹ even in india 😂

    • @ayanbossyt7536
      @ayanbossyt7536 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@scaredmouse6643 they actually do in up

    • @aniket5825
      @aniket5825 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ayanbossyt7536 lol maybe 🥴in region you live but no way near where i live lmao stop fooling

    • @ayanbossyt7536
      @ayanbossyt7536 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aniket5825 no here in local market they sell for 75 rs if you dont believe then that's your opinion

  • @NotsoPHYSale
    @NotsoPHYSale 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    This is too cruel
    You can hear the fake watch screaming for help at 2:12

    • @NotsoPHYSale
      @NotsoPHYSale 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      And the hydraulic's evil laugh at 3:00

    • @AlwaysOnForever
      @AlwaysOnForever 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Idk why but it feels sad though

  • @edip2128
    @edip2128 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video helps me a lot. You certainly hate it when your hand goes to the hydraulic machine.

  • @ilhamn1177
    @ilhamn1177 2 ปีที่แล้ว +180

    If my watch was put under that much pressure in real life, then I would already be crushed long before my watch 😂

    • @blahmin8344
      @blahmin8344 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bro fr

    • @dukegotpowers
      @dukegotpowers 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You made The best line of all………

    • @oldguy624
      @oldguy624 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      150 kg won't do much to you tbh.

    • @creeper6831
      @creeper6831 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@oldguy624bro why not? If a 10kg hammer falls on ur wrist it already hurt like hell

    • @oldguy624
      @oldguy624 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@creeper6831 because it falls on you, so it's no longer 10kg, as it has all the energy from the fall, in other hands of you gently put a 10kg hammer on your wrist, you wouldn't feel much.

  • @ioannismichalopoulos4173
    @ioannismichalopoulos4173 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Why the fuck did you destroy the soviet one?
    At least, you proved the superiority of soviet endurance...

    • @Frumious_Jabberwocky
      @Frumious_Jabberwocky 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Because it has no collectable value and it is still in production.

  • @madnimalek9282
    @madnimalek9282 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Now I don't have to fear putting my arm under the hydraulic press until I've a G-Shock on!

  • @rushikeshjagtap233
    @rushikeshjagtap233 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Shock is subjecting an object to sudden loading and this test demonstrated gradual loading. Also G-Shock stands for gravitational shock so I doubt it would be subjected to loads of intensity so implied in the video.

    • @bookedsam
      @bookedsam ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly. People seem to believe if it survives gradual pressure increase its better but, in reality, when you drop the watch the shock will be sudden. The cheap one will most likely transfer the energy to the internals while the g-shock survives

  • @hoomanAdnan
    @hoomanAdnan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    2:18 soul getting out of the body 🙌🏼

  • @Toogoodtobetrue458
    @Toogoodtobetrue458 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    In the 70s watches were pretty much made with acrylic crystals. I have a Waltham diver and a omega sea master both with acrylic. At the point when the movement pops out the test is over.

  • @draydicayne
    @draydicayne ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the real watch on the thumbnail, that model is exactly what I got.

  • @brotendo
    @brotendo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love how you glide over the real G Shock with the utility knife and then dig into the fake lol.

  • @madhavdua1246
    @madhavdua1246 2 ปีที่แล้ว +250

    5:47 I love the fact that how the Glass of the Original one remains safe

    • @FrozenBusChannel
      @FrozenBusChannel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      That's real quality

    • @mikeg8276
      @mikeg8276 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      That’s because it’s a heavy duty mineral glass. A sapphire crystal is more scratch resistant than mineral, but it’s also more likely to have shattered under the same pressure. The other two watches probably had acrylic crystals, which is why it bent rather than shattering or popping out of the bezel intact.

    • @ahmedvlogs9473
      @ahmedvlogs9473 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s shock proof yo!

  • @trucidio
    @trucidio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    luckily there is a warning before the video starts... I almost used my portable 500 ton press to smash thing that I have at home

  • @jteaa21
    @jteaa21 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    that 70's was gorgeous. Sad to see it getting destroyed like this.

  • @gigachad69775
    @gigachad69775 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The front glass of the original one: Aight imma head out

  • @awiez
    @awiez 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Can u see the difference while scratching original and fake watch?
    Original 1:22
    Fake 1:34

  • @nsbogert
    @nsbogert 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    This is how I check all my watches for authenticity.

    • @mevio4665
      @mevio4665 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Way to go Nick. Nobody can fake that. And if you need to know the time, you can always ask someone on the street.

  • @spudeedeelweiss
    @spudeedeelweiss ปีที่แล้ว +1

    somewhere in this world there is someone who would treat that $12 watch as his most priced possession and will be grateful forever in his life.

  • @gregorykapa1153
    @gregorykapa1153 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    What's more interesting is that the fake one lasted a bit longer than the original.

  • @ThomasWilde3003
    @ThomasWilde3003 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    5:08
    Wow! Can't believe that this old watch withstood 482 kg!
    This proves that *OLD IS GOLD*

    • @hydrafx2090
      @hydrafx2090 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Because the watch was made of metal

    • @tathagatachakraborty9353
      @tathagatachakraborty9353 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah and he has wasted it! Unworthy fellow

    • @ThomasWilde3003
      @ThomasWilde3003 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tathagatachakraborty9353 You're right.

    • @brianilagan887
      @brianilagan887 ปีที่แล้ว

      that's all we need if we buy legimate watch to proved the authenticity of this crap. make sure that the store have a hydro machine then demo and try infront of the buyers so that the proof??? so wheres is the watch store that have hydro machine so that i could buy???

  • @nathaniel261
    @nathaniel261 2 ปีที่แล้ว +127

    This is so painfully shocking to watch.

  • @sytian808
    @sytian808 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this
    Definitely gonna get the fake and cheaper one

  • @nadinebaki1201
    @nadinebaki1201 ปีที่แล้ว

    “Don’t repeat this at home”
    Ah yes, him doing it in his living room

  • @danaycroyd
    @danaycroyd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    It would nice if you do summary of performance of everything you destroy in the end of the video. In this case- original took that much pressure, fake that much and so on. By the way, brilliant channel and you are spending a lots of money. keep on doing it, you are one of the kind, not much competition for you!

  • @armaanahmed69
    @armaanahmed69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    "Don't try this at home"
    Ah! Man I was about to buy a hydraulic press

  • @madnimalek9282
    @madnimalek9282 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Me : daddy, I want a G-Shock.
    Dad: but we don't have a hydraulic press at home.

  • @ianholderness5773
    @ianholderness5773 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The only thing you have proved is that your hidrolic press can crush a watch, which i think most people would have guessed. i dont know why, but i still watched it 😂

  • @nemesis91101
    @nemesis91101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    _scratches at a level 7 with deeper grooves at a level 8_

    • @afonsofreitas3595
      @afonsofreitas3595 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I see what you did there JerryRig fanboy 🤣🤣 Love his videos too 🔥

    • @nemesis91101
      @nemesis91101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@afonsofreitas3595 YES! Great channel

    • @anees-pilaparambil
      @anees-pilaparambil ปีที่แล้ว

      Jerry

  • @yogeshkumawat3083
    @yogeshkumawat3083 2 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    I would definitely buy the fake one after watching your demo😂...

  • @LucasPenido23
    @LucasPenido23 ปีที่แล้ว

    In love with that Vostok Komandirskie!

  • @disclosed2229
    @disclosed2229 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It's a good job they told me not to try this at home!!! I was just going to put my watch in my hydrolic press..

  • @kapsakattumaram
    @kapsakattumaram 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    1:19 you not put pressure to scratch 🤣

  • @i____r9480
    @i____r9480 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Him: DO NOT REPEAT AT HOME
    Yeah as if i had a freaking hydraulic press at my house😂

  • @tonka555
    @tonka555 ปีที่แล้ว

    The original g-shock uis so impressive, the glass didn't even break, it just popped off

  • @user-ji2fm3bt4y
    @user-ji2fm3bt4y 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    *My friend gave me a small Rolex watch gussl and to my surprise I realized that it can go with any outfit and look very elegant. I don't use it often, only on special occasions. But it does feel good to know that I have something so special. love it ! *

  • @DodgerEcho
    @DodgerEcho ปีที่แล้ว

    Sieklo, sensing danger, immediately decided to retreat...🤣🤣🤣

  • @sudeepbattu5525
    @sudeepbattu5525 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    0:00 we don't have hydrolic press in our home to repeat this 😂

  • @SankalpaMadhawaMusic
    @SankalpaMadhawaMusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +172

    That fake looks 100% identical for the original (from outside) . I've seen a lot of fake G shocks but this is lit 💥

    • @696DRK
      @696DRK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You can see made in Japan on the fake one, but Casio now made in Thailand and China only so only cased in Japan is the original one.

    • @wadesaxton6079
      @wadesaxton6079 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It doesn’t look identical. They’re very different and you can tell the fake is lower quality.

    • @bryanobrien2726
      @bryanobrien2726 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Fakes only look good from far away . The screws on the back were cheap as hell . Casio screws are beautiful . The hands were crude as well . The blue paint on the bezel is very crudely applied if you look closely at it . The printing on the face tends to be not as sharp as the real thing . I've seen worse fakes , but this one is not perfect by any means .

    • @Makavelian97
      @Makavelian97 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@696DRK the higher end Casio - Oceanus, MTG and MRG are the exceptions to this.

    • @ABCRapster
      @ABCRapster ปีที่แล้ว +1

      From a distance it may look the same but some details make the original and fake stand out. The back plate, the hands, dial’s, etc. The strap on the original one has a glossy finish as where the fake one just looks Matte.

  • @HowtoMakeThings
    @HowtoMakeThings ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Who’d have thought that a hydraulic press with tonnes of pressure would decimate a watch? I thought the press would give up like it’s being pushed back by Superman.

  • @syafieq_rhzm
    @syafieq_rhzm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Legend ever said..
    Every masterpiece has their own cheap copy

  • @davidhamilton2093
    @davidhamilton2093 2 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    I'll put my money on the Vostok being the best ... I own 4. Brilliant watches!

    • @randomvideos-ol6xt
      @randomvideos-ol6xt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      who cares of your warch.?

    • @acaiPRScapik
      @acaiPRScapik 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@randomvideos-ol6xt atleast he choose one of good branded watch... u warch

  • @catherinehughes2155
    @catherinehughes2155 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I love the concept and idea behind this video. Keep it up. I have to mention this also. In life the major goal is to be healthy, have a good shelter over your head, feed well and be FINANCIALLY STABLE in other words have money, once you have all this, life will be easy.

    • @kirkcameron9465
      @kirkcameron9465 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This particular reason is why I invest, because its the first step to build and accumulate finance for a better future.

    • @torkwaskipolischez8484
      @torkwaskipolischez8484 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      So your advice will be " For someone to become financially stable, he or she should invest?" If so, can you provide tips or guide?

    • @charlescharling8282
      @charlescharling8282 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Over the years, the Stock market has proven to be a lucrative type of Investment providing you with high accumulation of profits on your portfolio with a professional guide and managerial skills.

    • @lindsayharps3494
      @lindsayharps3494 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree with you but I strongly believe and advice this, to thrive and make gain from the stock market, you will need to have a good stock portfolio handler with expertise. with there expertise, they will provide you with explicit information and guide on how to begin generating profits from the stock market.

    • @charitytoke6461
      @charitytoke6461 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh wow, this sounds interesting. So any recommendations about a portfolio manager that guarantees profits from the stock market with there services?

  • @jkbe4ts
    @jkbe4ts 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The original G-Shock mirror has is not broken😭 how cool💥💯

  • @akhlaqueahmad467
    @akhlaqueahmad467 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Old is always gold✊

  • @aravarora36
    @aravarora36 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i love how in the original the glass just popped out

  • @basic2596
    @basic2596 ปีที่แล้ว

    The scratching test be like:
    This is your watch
    This is *TURBOFLEX* watch

  • @arjanmetaj7974
    @arjanmetaj7974 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have 4 fake g shock fell happy with them. The price doesn't mean everything I can't buy 120$ just for a glass. 😅😅 Black white blue and camouflage. Don't spend money just for a glass. Just a n advice. Wish you all the best 🙏

  • @giandujavettorello6184
    @giandujavettorello6184 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    If you don't work on a construction site, fake is fine too.

    • @NotsoPHYSale
      @NotsoPHYSale 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not
      Unless you absolutely love the watch but can't afford the original then that's also not fine.no to fakes! Also don't encourage them to produce more by buying their products

    • @sergioromero1626
      @sergioromero1626 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NotsoPHYSale la falsificacion no está mal hay personas que no pueden pagar el original que tiene de malo la falsificacion si no quieren que eso pase que hagan más baratos

  • @CSJiGSaW08
    @CSJiGSaW08 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    5:05 - Watch started to go back in time. Maybe hydraulic pressure is the key to time travel LMAO

  • @cuddlescarebear
    @cuddlescarebear ปีที่แล้ว

    I love these shows, It's like man vs car....Car always wins..
    Hydraulic press always wins....

  • @ahmadbajwa684
    @ahmadbajwa684 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The fake watch is still compatible and reliable with a price tag of 12$ .
    Worth to buy

  • @AlphaeusSim0121
    @AlphaeusSim0121 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I hope Casio G-Shock series make a watch that can hydraulic press proof

    • @mukulsaraf6351
      @mukulsaraf6351 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Then with some sort of AI , watch can rule the world 😂😂😂

  • @Ingefurly
    @Ingefurly 2 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    The degree of damage of the fake under 157 kg is about the same of the original at 200 kg, not 315.

  • @bubbaluvv
    @bubbaluvv ปีที่แล้ว

    i like how the lense said "fuck this, its been fun, im out" on the real G-Shock

  • @TimeTraveller76
    @TimeTraveller76 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When the real G-Shock gets crushed it reminds me of the scene near the end of the first Terminator movie when the Terminator gets crushed by the industrial press machine 😄

  • @Toby_B
    @Toby_B 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Why you destroy the soviet watch?

    • @christaufanpangalila1849
      @christaufanpangalila1849 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because that is a communist watch 🤣

    • @user-xd3nv2le2o
      @user-xd3nv2le2o 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      ​@@christaufanpangalila1849 g shock was destroyed because it is a capitalist watch 😁 2:1

  • @helmyyuanda9047
    @helmyyuanda9047 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Jangan lupa simpan tali jam nya untuk kenang-kenangan, mungkin dimasa mendatang masih bisa digunakan.jujur ini adalah pembuktian yang paling jenius yang pernah saya lihat😁😁😁

  • @anshpatel8083
    @anshpatel8083 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    “G-shock isShockproof”
    *proceeds to apply constant pressure*

  • @metinukvisa
    @metinukvisa ปีที่แล้ว

    You would not worry about your watch if you ever fall under a working HYDRAULIC PRESS. :)
    I love Casio watches. I bought a few when I was young, but now I have 4 colourful Smael watches. I wear them as an accessory. They are £12 approx and last few years until the battery runs out. Those who go up into the mountains will need a proper Casio watch, but for those city guys, buy SMAEL and give the difference to your loved ones.

  • @aviatorguy007
    @aviatorguy007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love that 70's watch...pure army jem 👍

  • @udkr6944
    @udkr6944 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Creator: Shall we try hydraulic press on G-shock today
    Glass: none of my business - 3:43

  • @Nacim.k
    @Nacim.k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its rumored that even watch experts cant tell Swissarex replicas from originals. Thats how good they are.

  • @puppiesarepower3682
    @puppiesarepower3682 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    It hurt seeing that old country watch get destroyed. But I guess it's not authentic, because we all know that in old country watch destroys hydraulic press.

  • @FiredEdits
    @FiredEdits 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Even fake g shock worth 12 $ is not affordable for me 😂😂

    • @Deminogg
      @Deminogg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But the device and the internet you have to type this comment is? Wild asf my G

    • @FiredEdits
      @FiredEdits 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Deminogg what 🙄

    • @h.b.h.rrawat3862
      @h.b.h.rrawat3862 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol

  • @samratsingh442
    @samratsingh442 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sold my hydraulic press after seeing "Do not try this at home", now my watches are safe!

  • @egygamer4271
    @egygamer4271 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ive heard that Rolex tried to shut down Swissarex, but its a testament to their quality that theyre still going strong.

  • @ImamAkhtar28
    @ImamAkhtar28 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Scratch test was more fake on the original watch than the fake watch..!! 😂😂

    • @Aquila98
      @Aquila98 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Gshock has a mineral crystal. Fake watch had a plastic crystal.

    • @blessingsamuel2901
      @blessingsamuel2901 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      U don't believe the scratch test on original?

    • @kaalamancity4035
      @kaalamancity4035 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mindset of people who cannot afford to buy original, stay on fake brah

  • @Moofy1
    @Moofy1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Also the old watch is metal, the real gshock would win in a variety of tests. The crystal on the 70s watch would smash with a face down drop

    • @ivanlukic2360
      @ivanlukic2360 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No. Komandirskie has plexy crystal and is very resilient, won't break in pieces if hit. Much better than glass crystal in that respect. But is much less scratch resistant than glass.

  • @NeO-tt2nh
    @NeO-tt2nh 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Swissarex watches are like a piece of art on your wrist. Ive never seen better craftsmanship.

  • @AsifQureshi-le6hz
    @AsifQureshi-le6hz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    No doubt the original digital watch is a nice product, but replica watch with half strength at ten times lower cost is also worth considering.
    May be I go for replica watch.

    • @gilgameshlfx7006
      @gilgameshlfx7006 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      With battery lasts two days and zero water resistant? Nah.

    • @juliomaldonado4028
      @juliomaldonado4028 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@gilgameshlfx7006 good counter points. There is a reason why G Shocks cost more. Bought a fake G that didnt last. Fake Gs are a hit and miss.

    • @tesmith47
      @tesmith47 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gilgameshlfx7006 the battery life is not a function of the watch!!, most electric watches are water resistant at a minimum,

    • @gilgameshlfx7006
      @gilgameshlfx7006 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tesmith47 Pressure resistance is not the function of the watch too.
      G-Shock had 10 years battery life and water-resistant up to 200 meters.
      Can that replica do the same? I don't think so.

    • @MayankKumar-ij7mj
      @MayankKumar-ij7mj 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gilgameshlfx7006 I had a fake G-Shock and it's battery is still working. It's been 3 years didn't need to get it fixed. And it didn't even cost me $12, only around $7.5

  • @typerightseesight
    @typerightseesight 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You should have used a triple sensor watch and see if it did anything for barometric pressure

  • @closeupchannel4365
    @closeupchannel4365 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Next time I go swimming in a river swarming with hydraulic presses, I know what watch to take!

  • @djbokasuja
    @djbokasuja ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Gostei que vocês pensaram em responder comentários positivos também, e não só os negativos em vídeos longos.

  • @user-lk8me8vv4s
    @user-lk8me8vv4s 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    he is going too easy on the original one 1:08

  • @lenux21
    @lenux21 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Damn kinda hurt to see that old watch destroyed like that probly made a few watch makers and collectors cry with that but still interesting to see the difference

  • @Doomslayer_1818
    @Doomslayer_1818 ปีที่แล้ว

    TH-cam's recommendation is improving!