I falli che ha subito tanti un giudice di gara corretto avrebbe spedito due tre giocayori della francia fuori con cartellini rossi .😢😢😢😢un fenomeno Baggio! Unico .
not starting Baggio was criminal....for the little he played we were most dangerous and the French were panicking..almost..anyone remember when Baggio was benched also for no reason against Argentina? Only Italian coaches could be so arrogant
yep, in 1990........stupid...Baggio-Schillaci was working....why change it? anyway, Baggio had stupid coaches for almost all his career (esp National team)
@@NaturaBreeze I think the 1990 Argentina game was down to Baggio being so young, for that crunch match the coach and his staff were probably inclined to stick with the more experienced line up despite the great form of Baggio. And in France 98 Del Piero was the golden boy, the new star at club level, and despite the fact that he had not been a spectacular performer at international level and had suffered a recent injury, and wasn't playing quite as well as Baggio at the tournament, they favoured him because he was that star player. The only world cup where Baggio was the undisputed no1 choice, the golden boy in his prime (pretty much anyway), was USA 94, and by unfortunate coincidence that was the only world cup at which he was having injury problems, which held him back in the final.
@@danyoutube7491 I don't buy the experience excuse. Baggio was 23, it wasn't as if he was 18 and fresh on the scene. He had just become the most expensive player in the World after excelling at Fiorentina for at least 3 seasons. Vialli had never consistently produced for Italy and was again disappointing (along with Carnevale) in the opening game against Austria. What Vicini did was madness. The team had looked great during their run to the semi-final. Without Baggio, the team lost its fluency and looked extremely nervous, sitting on their lead which they didn't do in the previous games. But you are correct with your other points. The Italian management (in the 1990's) based their decisions on anything other than form and paid the price. If I remember correctly Baggio went into the 1994 tournament carrying an injury and then picked up another vs Bulgaria. It was incredible how he lasted 120 minutes in the Pasadena heat.
Grande Roberto Baggio. Idolo deportivo de mi niñez y modelo de mi estilo de juego, un 10. Un ejemplo de vida y de superacion deportiva, tras de fallar el penalty del 94, el mundo se le vino abajo; pero logró sobreponerse en el 98 dandole Dios la oportunidad de ser convocado, aunque no era titular , tenia la categoria del mas grande de los italianos de la historia para entrar y ser decisivo en un partido.
En el 98 tranquilamente otro técnico lo ponía titular y debió ser llevado al mundial 2002, recuerdo como todos los italianos lo pedían y el técnico no lo llevó...
Del piero will never be anything close to baggio !! Baggio was a God and he should of played the whole game !!! That game changed when he entered !!!! #divinocodino
Without exception, Baggio made every one of his attack partners better. There was not one player that he did not gel with. Him and Romario were the prototypes for the type of attackers who came to dominate the game. Players such as Ronaldo Lima, Henry, Messi, Cristiano, etc. Watch the goals he scored and you can see where these players got their style from.
That match is a regret for every Italian: under pressure (it was said) from the sponsors and Moggi's Juventus, Cesare Maldini made a weak, injured and poor Del Piero play as a starter which forced Italy to play badly and on defense throughout the game. When Maldini decided to remove Del Piero and put in the great Baggio, Italy became inspired and proactive by his genius, finally playing football, but by then it was too late.
Considering the form he was in and how much better he did than Del Piero (who had recently recovered from injury and was out of form that tournament unfortunately, after having an amazing season himself) when he come on against France (and all tournament), if only he had started that game, and if only we had had a more adventurous manager that year, rather than a defensive-minded coach like Maldini who would only deploy two forwards (a second striker and a centreforward), and who played with a libero. With all our talent back then, especially up-front, we could've played with Baggio as a playmaker behind Del Piero and Vieri. Maybe even a 3-4-1-2, with Pagliuca in goal, Bergomi/Nesta, Cannavaro, and Costacurta in a three-man back-line, Maldini as a left wingback, Moriero on the right flank, and Di Biagio and Albertini in midfield.
At 31 I don't think Baggio had enough in his tank to play the full 90 every game. Since Del Piero was not fully fit I think there should have been an expanded role for Inzaghi. At the end of the day if Baggio buries the volley in extra time against France we're not having this discussion.
@@DanielSong39 Nah, that's not true; I know that coaches always said that Baggio couldn't play a full match, because of all his injuries, but he was in good shape that season and played a lot of games for Bologna and scored and created a lot of goals. He also played the full 90 minutes against Chile and was fantastic, so even though he was 31, he could handle it, and he did create a lot more chances when he came on against France, whereas unfortunately Alex was out of shape after the last minute injury at the end of the season, even though he also had an amazing year with Juve. I agree that with Milan Baggio didn't look like he was in great physical condition, and looked sluggish, and Capello often substituted him, but with Bologna he looked like a new person and his fitness coach did a lot of gym work with him, and he was far more dynamic. I agree that Inzaghi probably deserved more space, but I don't think that Inzaghi and Vieri would've worked as we wouldn't have had a second striker, just two out-and-out strikers, and Vieri was on fire that tournament. Unfortunately Maldini was also a very old-fashioned coach, who was fixed on a four-man flat midfield, when we had a great team and should've played a more attacking formation considering we had so much quality, maybe even a 4-3-1-2, with Di Biagio and Albertini in midfield with another ball-winner, and maybe Baggio behind Del Piero and Vieri, although this formation would've excluded Moriero who was in good form on the right wing. We also had other good attacking players on the bench who didn't get much space either like Chiesa, who could also play as a second striker. Instead Maldini goes and plays with a sweeper and three man-markers and insists on only two forwards when the fans wanted an attacking trident with Baggio and Del Piero...with all our talent, we should have played way better footballl than we did, and although we only went out to the winners in the quarter-finals on penalties, we probably could've done even better with that team. We had an amazing defence, good goalkeepers, good midfielders, and fantastic forwards. And, I mean, yes, it's a shame Baggio didn't bury the volley that would've given us the golden goal against France, but although he came very close and struck it well, it wasn't an extremely easy chance, he had great technique so he made it look simple. Unfortunately I think if he had looked at Barthez he maybe could've had the time to take a touch and then hit it, but he tried to strike it first time.
@@jackpuccini3143 Well the coach knows best what the players can and can't do. Still have no idea why Del Piero played so much though. That's something the coach and assistants should be able to pick out in training.
Italia 3-4-1-2 vs France ( no Nesta ) Pacliuca Cannavaro Costacusta Maldini Di Livio Albertini Di Biagio Pesotto Baggio Vieri Inzaghi Etc ( Toldo , Bergomi , Toricelli , Moriero , Dino Baggio , Delpiero , Chiesa ) .
@@phatlocphongthuy4185 I really like that formation; if only that had been the case! I still think I would have preferred Moriero on the right over Di Livio though, because he really could cause problems going forward with his speed, dribbling, creativity, and crossing ability on the right wing, and he also worked hard defensively, and Pessotto was already more defensive-minded on the left, but if Maldini had played that system I doubt Moriero would have played as balance was always his concern! Di Livio also could have been an option on the left instead. Both were solid players who ran a lot and were decent tactically and defensively and pushed up the flanks and crossed well, but they weren't very skilful, but they were strong mentally and at Juve they played an important part in Lippi's all-conquering side. Aside from those unglamorous but effective wingbacks, that formation really doesn't have many weaknesses. Di Biagio and Albertini were really good in midfield, Cananvaro, Maldini and Costacurta were three of the best defenders in the world, Pagliuca was still a world class goalkeeper, and Vieri, Inzaghi, and Baggio were some of the best forwards in the world. Maybe Chiesa over Inzaghi would've been a bit better alongside a true centre-forward like Vieri, as he could play both as as second striker and as a striker, but Pippo deserved more space!
Giusto ci avrebbe portato in finale forse' per questo non lo hanno fatto giocare sempre era gia' destinato che doveva vincere la francia giocava in francia normale!
ma sai? io penso addirittura tre, in Italia 90 era fortissimo ma con l'argentina entrò soltanto verso la fine mi pare o solo il secondo tempo e stava segnando su calcio di punizione
Italia debio ganar ese partido. Francia solo defendia y buscaba los contragolpes. Baggio, pese a ser un veterano, tenia aun la magia en sus pies. Que grande el italiano !!! De lo mejor del mundial 98.
The degree of difficulty for Baggio to score that almost goal was 100. Someone mentioned he should have scored. Only a player of his quality COULD have scored a goal like that.
Exactly; the thing is, his technique was amazing and he struck volleys so well, including that one, which barely missed the post, so he made it look a lot easier than it was, but most players probably would've just scuffed it completely
@@dsanchez9703 Yes, although at least unlike Totti Del Piero didn't just star in Serie A, but did also play well in Europe, like Baggio did as well (even though unfortunately because of the old regulations Baggio mainly starred in the UEFA Cup, whereas Alex did well in the Champions League). But yes, none of those number 10s ever played anywhere near as well as Baggio did with Italy unfortunately.
@@DanielSong39 It wasn't just that though; he underwent an intense fitness regime that season and did a lot of gym work, with multiple hours a day with a personal trainer, so he was in far better shape than he had been in previous seasons. He wasn't just fresher, he was sharper physically, and mentally he was far more confident. With Milan, he looked more sluggish and despondent, and older than he was, but at Bologna he looked like his younger self again, really dynamic and aggressive in his attacking and risk-taking on the ball, and he played that way at the 1998 World Cup as well. He was the best player on the pitch for the entire 90 minutes when he started against Chile in the opening match, setting up Vieri's opener and winning a last minute penalty to equalise, which he scored. Then he also created Di Biagio's goal against Cameroon when he started. After that he played well after coming off the bench against Austria and France, but he would have done well had he started; unlike his time with Milan, where he was often substituted, with Bologna he was playing entire matches, and a lot of games, so he could handle an entire game. But Del Piero was poor all tournament even when at the beginning of matches he started, because unfortunately he was out of form following his last minute injury, and he also felt the pressure a lot more with Italy than Baggio did, even though he had had an amazing season with Juve, and was amazing at club level up until his injury later that year.
Io più vedo Roberto Baggio contro la Francia e più dico che il povero Maldini che non c’è più avrebbe dovuto puntare su di lui del Piero era un morto che camminava abbiamo giocato in 10 per troppo tempo …si notava troppo il cambio di passo tra i due Baggio in forma eccezionale !!!
Baggio was better than many legends of the last few decades like Zidane, Kaká, Pirlo, Xavi or Iniesta because this players were outstanding in in one or two qualities like elegance, speed, dribbling, scoring and free-kick precision while Baggio had all this qualities combined. Unfortunately, that penalty in that final and his many injuries caused him to be greatly underrated. Even in this WC Baggio's game was severely undermined by the many knee surgeries he had gone over the years. Still, for me he was better than Del Piero (no doubts he was a great player himself). But I'd say Baggio is in the same category as players like Ronaldinho, Zico, Jairzinho, Mattheus or Kempes and only behind super stars like Ronaldo, Pelé, Messi, Beckenbauer or Maradona.
Del Piero never reached Baggios level. Never ever. Especially in national team Del Piero often didn't make the difference. And when he made the difference, he did it not in italian favor....
Roberto Baggio has a somehow tragic story because he was a great talent, yet he suffered many injuries that undermined his game when he was at his prime and in the 94 WC he missed the decisive penalty after having led Italy to the final. As far as for me, Baggio is one of the best attacking midfielders/second strikers in the history of football, regarding his talent he is only behind Maradona, Ronaldinho or Zico but better than Zidane, Platini, Xavi, Iniesta or Pirlo.
@@PrincipeAzzurri Yes but no. I didn't see Zico at his prime, but I heard he played really well in his first year in Udinese, however in his second year Udinese had economic problems and Zico suffered from injuries and eventually he was sent back to Flamengo. Still, Zico was an amazing player and he played mostly in Brazil which at the time wasn't unusual. Ronaldinho was transferred to Milan because Guardiola didn't want to deal with his lifestyle and because his game was starting to decline, but when Ronaldinho was at his prime won everything (Leagues, Cups, Champions, Copas America and the World Cup). That's why I don't judge Ronaldinho based on his time in Milan because he wasn't at his best, he surely had good games and moments but not comparable to when he was in Barcelona.
Had Baggio's volley gone in 3:57 Italy would have won that World Cup (Golden goal)......then Croatia semi (would have won)..then a terrible Brazil in the final :)
@@jackpuccini3143 4 years older, but was in much better physical shape in 1998. Baggio went into the 1994 WC carrying I believe an achilles injury. He picked up a hamstring/thigh strain in the semi against Bulgaria. As ever throughout his career, he performed miracles despite being almost crippled.
Jamas en mi vida vi una ciudad en caos y protestas por 3 dias como paso en florencia cuando la fiorentina vendio a robi a la juventus crack roberto baggio
@@PIP...33 Utter nonsense. When you have a world class talent, an all-time great, you have to both field that talent and give them the freedom to express themselves and not leave them to rot on the bench or not select them when they are available. His stamina wasn't a problem, and while he had a very tough time with injuries, he still managed to play many games (approx 699, scoring 318 goals) throughout his career and play up to the age of 37. Also, his goals and assists record for a number 10 was incredible. He did the business for Italy, Vicenza, Fiorentina, Juve, Bologna and Brescia. Yes, he had problems with injuries during his time at AC and Inter, but both teams at the time were in a mess, swapping managers every 5 minutes, and those managers often played Baggio out of position, setting him up to fail. And in spite of the mess in Milan he still was very important in helping Inter beat Madrid to qualify out of the CL group and beating Parma in the CL play-off., and helping Milan win the title in his first season there - I believe he made the most assists in Serie A that season.
Italy were eliminated 3 consecutive times on penalties at the World Cup, and Baggio was involved in all 3 of them. I wonder what he thinks of penalties...
Baggio was not lucky with WC he never lost the WC and he never won it. 90 lost semi by penalties,94 lost final by penalties and 98 lost quarter penalties again.
Ketika baggio masuk menggantikan Alex, serangan itali lbh bervariasi, bahkan jika hakim garis tdk berpihak pd tuan rmh,vieri bs sj bking golhasil assist baggio..voli baggio jika gol,, zidane dkk pasti akn menangis dibuatnya. Walaupun robi berhasil dlm eksekusi.. Tp rizki baggio dipiala dunia gagal
Because he was in terrible form and not so great physical shape. He was a shadow against France, it was if Italy was playing with 10 men. Baggio completely eclipsed Del Piero throughout the tournament. Cesare Maldini made a massive mistake in not starting Baggio in every game. He had been outstanding for Bologna, and was in the best physical condition of his career (he carried several injuries during 1994).
Si metia esa volea hubiera sido como...minimo el segundo mejor gol del mundial despues. De el de, dennis bergkamp....por el grado de dificultad ,la fase que se jugaba y ademas gol oro.⚽🇮🇹🧞
Nike tournament? Do you mean the 1997 Tournoi featuring Italy, France, Brazil, and England? If so, I strongly disagree. We finished 4th in that competition, bottom, losing to England, and despite drawing 3-3 with Brazil and 1-1 with France, we were lucky to get any points at all because we were outplayed in all 3 games. During the 1998 World Cup, Italy played much better when Baggio was in the team. He was scoring and assisting goals and was a constant menace. Del Piero was in terrible form, largely due to not being fit, but even so, aside from that 'cherry-on-the-top' goal against Germany in 2006, Del Piero was largely disappointing for Italy; a shadow of the player we saw at Juve - who can forget those costly misses in the Euro 2000 final? No, Baggio didn't hurt the team at all. He gave us some much needed imagination, penetration and excitement. Cesare Maldini hurt the team the most, playing with a very defensive midfield, playing the likes of Pessotto - a full back - in central midfield. Had Baggio started the game against France (as he should have against Argentina in the 1990 Semi-Final), or came off the bench earlier we would have had a much better chance of winning, and who knows, he might have put that volley away because he'd have been caught up even more into the pace of the game, more warmed up.
vecchio Roby lo meritavi un mondiale, per me rimani il piú forte che abbia mai visto giocare a calcio!!! Inarrivabile
E su questo commento non c'è da aggiungere altro. RobyBaggio #1
I falli che ha subito tanti un giudice di gara corretto avrebbe spedito due tre giocayori della francia fuori con cartellini rossi .😢😢😢😢un fenomeno Baggio! Unico .
Roberto Baggio, the best player for me❤
Most talented footballer ever produced by Italy. No one can be compared with him. He was pure talent. He is par with Messi and Ronaldo.
ridiculous statement. Baggio was so much better than the guys you mentioned. Baggio is the best football player EVER !
Baggio by far the better Italian who played football
LOL...I'll take Maradona and Baggio over those two any day!
Rivera y Del Piero
@@felixreali7101 Baggio and Zidane. I would put Zidane first.
Such a great player, I'm French and I've always loved him...
Baggio The best player ever ,, from arabia saudita
i remember this match, when finally del piero was substituted with him the match changed from defensive to offensive
Del Piero was an epic disappointment in all world cups and euros/
True
Should have started Baggio.
No one talks about that penalty. Baggio. Simply the greatest. Grande Roby.
Que te puedo decir ....era un grande del fútbol para mí el mejor de todos los tiempos en Italia un fuera de clase 🇮🇹
not starting Baggio was criminal....for the little he played we were most dangerous and the French were panicking..almost..anyone remember when Baggio was benched also for no reason against Argentina? Only Italian coaches could be so arrogant
yep, in 1990........stupid...Baggio-Schillaci was working....why change it?
anyway, Baggio had stupid coaches for almost all his career (esp National team)
@@NaturaBreeze I think the 1990 Argentina game was down to Baggio being so young, for that crunch match the coach and his staff were probably inclined to stick with the more experienced line up despite the great form of Baggio. And in France 98 Del Piero was the golden boy, the new star at club level, and despite the fact that he had not been a spectacular performer at international level and had suffered a recent injury, and wasn't playing quite as well as Baggio at the tournament, they favoured him because he was that star player. The only world cup where Baggio was the undisputed no1 choice, the golden boy in his prime (pretty much anyway), was USA 94, and by unfortunate coincidence that was the only world cup at which he was having injury problems, which held him back in the final.
@@danyoutube7491 I don't buy the experience excuse. Baggio was 23, it wasn't as if he was 18 and fresh on the scene. He had just become the most expensive player in the World after excelling at Fiorentina for at least 3 seasons. Vialli had never consistently produced for Italy and was again disappointing (along with Carnevale) in the opening game against Austria. What Vicini did was madness. The team had looked great during their run to the semi-final. Without Baggio, the team lost its fluency and looked extremely nervous, sitting on their lead which they didn't do in the previous games. But you are correct with your other points.
The Italian management (in the 1990's) based their decisions on anything other than form and paid the price. If I remember correctly Baggio went into the 1994 tournament carrying an injury and then picked up another vs Bulgaria. It was incredible how he lasted 120 minutes in the Pasadena heat.
Yes Stefano
Everybody knows, Stefano, but why didn't he score here: 3:55 (Unforgettable)
Grande Roberto Baggio. Idolo deportivo de mi niñez y modelo de mi estilo de juego, un 10. Un ejemplo de vida y de superacion deportiva, tras de fallar el penalty del 94, el mundo se le vino abajo; pero logró sobreponerse en el 98 dandole Dios la oportunidad de ser convocado, aunque no era titular , tenia la categoria del mas grande de los italianos de la historia para entrar y ser decisivo en un partido.
Además superó muchas lesiones de rodilla y siempre volvió
En el 98 tranquilamente otro técnico lo ponía titular y debió ser llevado al mundial 2002, recuerdo como todos los italianos lo pedían y el técnico no lo llevó...
Miss the days when Baggio was still playing...
Del piero will never be anything close to baggio !! Baggio was a God and he should of played the whole game !!! That game changed when he entered !!!! #divinocodino
Without exception, Baggio made every one of his attack partners better. There was not one player that he did not gel with. Him and Romario were the prototypes for the type of attackers who came to dominate the game. Players such as Ronaldo Lima, Henry, Messi, Cristiano, etc. Watch the goals he scored and you can see where these players got their style from.
That match is a regret for every Italian: under pressure (it was said) from the sponsors and Moggi's Juventus, Cesare Maldini made a weak, injured and poor Del Piero play as a starter which forced Italy to play badly and on defense throughout the game. When Maldini decided to remove Del Piero and put in the great Baggio, Italy became inspired and proactive by his genius, finally playing football, but by then it was too late.
Tbh Italy looked much better when Baggio was playing; they looked very dangerous offensively. Italy finds more fluidity when he’s in.
Considering the form he was in and how much better he did than Del Piero (who had recently recovered from injury and was out of form that tournament unfortunately, after having an amazing season himself) when he come on against France (and all tournament), if only he had started that game, and if only we had had a more adventurous manager that year, rather than a defensive-minded coach like Maldini who would only deploy two forwards (a second striker and a centreforward), and who played with a libero. With all our talent back then, especially up-front, we could've played with Baggio as a playmaker behind Del Piero and Vieri. Maybe even a 3-4-1-2, with Pagliuca in goal, Bergomi/Nesta, Cannavaro, and Costacurta in a three-man back-line, Maldini as a left wingback, Moriero on the right flank, and Di Biagio and Albertini in midfield.
At 31 I don't think Baggio had enough in his tank to play the full 90 every game. Since Del Piero was not fully fit I think there should have been an expanded role for Inzaghi.
At the end of the day if Baggio buries the volley in extra time against France we're not having this discussion.
@@DanielSong39 Nah, that's not true; I know that coaches always said that Baggio couldn't play a full match, because of all his injuries, but he was in good shape that season and played a lot of games for Bologna and scored and created a lot of goals. He also played the full 90 minutes against Chile and was fantastic, so even though he was 31, he could handle it, and he did create a lot more chances when he came on against France, whereas unfortunately Alex was out of shape after the last minute injury at the end of the season, even though he also had an amazing year with Juve. I agree that with Milan Baggio didn't look like he was in great physical condition, and looked sluggish, and Capello often substituted him, but with Bologna he looked like a new person and his fitness coach did a lot of gym work with him, and he was far more dynamic.
I agree that Inzaghi probably deserved more space, but I don't think that Inzaghi and Vieri would've worked as we wouldn't have had a second striker, just two out-and-out strikers, and Vieri was on fire that tournament. Unfortunately Maldini was also a very old-fashioned coach, who was fixed on a four-man flat midfield, when we had a great team and should've played a more attacking formation considering we had so much quality, maybe even a 4-3-1-2, with Di Biagio and Albertini in midfield with another ball-winner, and maybe Baggio behind Del Piero and Vieri, although this formation would've excluded Moriero who was in good form on the right wing. We also had other good attacking players on the bench who didn't get much space either like Chiesa, who could also play as a second striker. Instead Maldini goes and plays with a sweeper and three man-markers and insists on only two forwards when the fans wanted an attacking trident with Baggio and Del Piero...with all our talent, we should have played way better footballl than we did, and although we only went out to the winners in the quarter-finals on penalties, we probably could've done even better with that team. We had an amazing defence, good goalkeepers, good midfielders, and fantastic forwards.
And, I mean, yes, it's a shame Baggio didn't bury the volley that would've given us the golden goal against France, but although he came very close and struck it well, it wasn't an extremely easy chance, he had great technique so he made it look simple. Unfortunately I think if he had looked at Barthez he maybe could've had the time to take a touch and then hit it, but he tried to strike it first time.
@@jackpuccini3143 Well the coach knows best what the players can and can't do. Still have no idea why Del Piero played so much though. That's something the coach and assistants should be able to pick out in training.
Italia 3-4-1-2 vs France ( no Nesta )
Pacliuca
Cannavaro Costacusta Maldini
Di Livio Albertini Di Biagio Pesotto
Baggio
Vieri Inzaghi
Etc ( Toldo , Bergomi , Toricelli , Moriero , Dino Baggio , Delpiero , Chiesa ) .
@@phatlocphongthuy4185 I really like that formation; if only that had been the case! I still think I would have preferred Moriero on the right over Di Livio though, because he really could cause problems going forward with his speed, dribbling, creativity, and crossing ability on the right wing, and he also worked hard defensively, and Pessotto was already more defensive-minded on the left, but if Maldini had played that system I doubt Moriero would have played as balance was always his concern! Di Livio also could have been an option on the left instead. Both were solid players who ran a lot and were decent tactically and defensively and pushed up the flanks and crossed well, but they weren't very skilful, but they were strong mentally and at Juve they played an important part in Lippi's all-conquering side. Aside from those unglamorous but effective wingbacks, that formation really doesn't have many weaknesses. Di Biagio and Albertini were really good in midfield, Cananvaro, Maldini and Costacurta were three of the best defenders in the world, Pagliuca was still a world class goalkeeper, and Vieri, Inzaghi, and Baggio were some of the best forwards in the world. Maybe Chiesa over Inzaghi would've been a bit better alongside a true centre-forward like Vieri, as he could play both as as second striker and as a striker, but Pippo deserved more space!
Baggio debio ser titular todo ese mundial ya que estaba en muy buen forma otra ves y Del Piero fue mas jugador de Serie A que de nivel Seleccion!
Giusto ci avrebbe portato in finale forse' per questo non lo hanno fatto giocare sempre era gia' destinato che doveva vincere la francia giocava in francia normale!
Concordo pienamente Baggio in forma Vale dieci Del Piero!
Baggio, Maldini, e del Piero, Cannavaro, Vieri, Costacurta, E più… Que squadra
Baggio poteva portarsi a casa due Mondiali per un motivo e per un'altro ha perso ma la sua grandezza non v'era mai dimenticata.
ma sai? io penso addirittura tre, in Italia 90 era fortissimo ma con l'argentina entrò soltanto verso la fine mi pare o solo il secondo tempo e stava segnando su calcio di punizione
Italia debio ganar ese partido. Francia solo defendia y buscaba los contragolpes.
Baggio, pese a ser un veterano, tenia aun la magia en sus pies. Que grande el italiano !!! De lo mejor del mundial 98.
I’ll go with that....true
Regardez ce match et vous pourrez voir à quel point Roberto Baggio est génial.
Diego y baggio los mejores del mundo lejossss
Non riuscivano neppure a toccarlo, magnifico!
Maestro Baggio
Roberto Baggio You are Best
El mejor italiano que he visto jugar un crack, mi ídolo.
Y yo Del Piero
Del piero sin dudas
Ustedes no vieron nada
Genio ídolo bestia figura leyenda crack 😃
Giocatore incredibile. grazie per il video
Roberto Baggio number one 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀.
Fotboll is less important for me after BAGGIO ended his career.
More than a player..
Baggio n.1
The degree of difficulty for Baggio to score that almost goal was 100. Someone mentioned he should have scored. Only a player of his quality COULD have scored a goal like that.
Exactly; the thing is, his technique was amazing and he struck volleys so well, including that one, which barely missed the post, so he made it look a lot easier than it was, but most players probably would've just scuffed it completely
Paolo Rossi fue mejor
Unique Genius!
if Del Piero was "Pinturicchio" Baggio was "Raffaello Sanzio"
Baggio é dotado de talento puro para o futebol.
They should have played him from the start, either in place of Del Piero or together with him, as was often the case at Juve with good results.
He didn't have the gas to go the full 90, he was effective because he was a substitute and had fresh legs.
You r right Delpiero was never as good as Baggio on the National Team, Del Piero was more of a Serie A player
@@dsanchez9703 Yes, although at least unlike Totti Del Piero didn't just star in Serie A, but did also play well in Europe, like Baggio did as well (even though unfortunately because of the old regulations Baggio mainly starred in the UEFA Cup, whereas Alex did well in the Champions League). But yes, none of those number 10s ever played anywhere near as well as Baggio did with Italy unfortunately.
@@DanielSong39 It wasn't just that though; he underwent an intense fitness regime that season and did a lot of gym work, with multiple hours a day with a personal trainer, so he was in far better shape than he had been in previous seasons. He wasn't just fresher, he was sharper physically, and mentally he was far more confident. With Milan, he looked more sluggish and despondent, and older than he was, but at Bologna he looked like his younger self again, really dynamic and aggressive in his attacking and risk-taking on the ball, and he played that way at the 1998 World Cup as well. He was the best player on the pitch for the entire 90 minutes when he started against Chile in the opening match, setting up Vieri's opener and winning a last minute penalty to equalise, which he scored. Then he also created Di Biagio's goal against Cameroon when he started. After that he played well after coming off the bench against Austria and France, but he would have done well had he started; unlike his time with Milan, where he was often substituted, with Bologna he was playing entire matches, and a lot of games, so he could handle an entire game. But Del Piero was poor all tournament even when at the beginning of matches he started, because unfortunately he was out of form following his last minute injury, and he also felt the pressure a lot more with Italy than Baggio did, even though he had had an amazing season with Juve, and was amazing at club level up until his injury later that year.
@@jackpuccini3143 Well said
Io più vedo Roberto Baggio contro la Francia e più dico che il povero Maldini che non c’è più avrebbe dovuto puntare su di lui del Piero era un morto che camminava abbiamo giocato in 10 per troppo tempo …si notava troppo il cambio di passo tra i due Baggio in forma eccezionale !!!
Purtroppo c' erano di mezzo gli sponsor e la juventus. Questi due fattori hanno inciso molto.
Before Baggio substitute everything is zidane. After substitute Baggio stop zidane show. It already seem Baggio control the game better than zidane
Baggio stole everybody's show, Zidane, Ronaldo, everybody!
Baggio wasn't only a champion , he was something else ,Like Maradona.
Baggio is a player from the same caliber as Cruyff or Maradona
Baggio was better than many legends of the last few decades like Zidane, Kaká, Pirlo, Xavi or Iniesta because this players were outstanding in in one or two qualities like elegance, speed, dribbling, scoring and free-kick precision while Baggio had all this qualities combined. Unfortunately, that penalty in that final and his many injuries caused him to be greatly underrated.
Even in this WC Baggio's game was severely undermined by the many knee surgeries he had gone over the years. Still, for me he was better than Del Piero (no doubts he was a great player himself).
But I'd say Baggio is in the same category as players like Ronaldinho, Zico, Jairzinho, Mattheus or Kempes and only behind super stars like Ronaldo, Pelé, Messi, Beckenbauer or Maradona.
@@AngelGonzalez-yb6gu absolutely correct buddy. Also not to forget Baggio had multiple surgeries unlike others.
Del Piero never reached Baggios level. Never ever. Especially in national team Del Piero often didn't make the difference. And when he made the difference, he did it not in italian favor....
Èl rober baggio incredible
Baggio should have played that game, not that incapable Del Piero
Baggio, futebol mágico. Gênio simples, melhor que muitos antipáticos e supervalorizados de hoje.
Baggio number 1 Italian player...
When you talkabout pure skill quick thinking brain baggio has to come first surely !!!!
Roberto Baggio has a somehow tragic story because he was a great talent, yet he suffered many injuries that undermined his game when he was at his prime and in the 94 WC he missed the decisive penalty after having led Italy to the final.
As far as for me, Baggio is one of the best attacking midfielders/second strikers in the history of football, regarding his talent he is only behind Maradona, Ronaldinho or Zico but better than Zidane, Platini, Xavi, Iniesta or Pirlo.
Baggio wasn't a midfielder he was a second striker
@@PrincipeAzzurri Yes but no. I didn't see Zico at his prime, but I heard he played really well in his first year in Udinese, however in his second year Udinese had economic problems and Zico suffered from injuries and eventually he was sent back to Flamengo. Still, Zico was an amazing player and he played mostly in Brazil which at the time wasn't unusual.
Ronaldinho was transferred to Milan because Guardiola didn't want to deal with his lifestyle and because his game was starting to decline, but when Ronaldinho was at his prime won everything (Leagues, Cups, Champions, Copas America and the World Cup). That's why I don't judge Ronaldinho based on his time in Milan because he wasn't at his best, he surely had good games and moments but not comparable to when he was in Barcelona.
Melhor jogador italiano que eu vi jogar.
E dava pra jogar Baggio e Del Piero em 1998.
The game changed when he came in! Unlucky!
Baggio 🙌🙌🙌
Cesare Maldini doveva schierare Baggio dal inizio ogni partita..Del Piero non era al massimo..e questo sbaglio e' stato determinante.
Give him 10 more mins, who knows what will happen
Had Baggio's volley gone in 3:57 Italy would have won that World Cup (Golden goal)......then Croatia semi (would have won)..then a terrible Brazil in the final :)
At the end France did that. At the time the sentiment was that the team that was going to win this game would win the cup.
@@sebastiantevel898brazil would have made baggio cry again had they met in the final😂
@@clbl not that Brazil of 1998.
What a player... my all time fav alongside messi
Baggiony del piero no jugaron juntos?
If Baggio had scored that goal, Italy could pass Croatia and, in the final, take Brazil. It would be fantastic!
Would've been nice to have gotten the chance to play a rematch, especially as he was in good form in 1998 even though he was four years older.
You know that Italy never won against croacia? Croacia beat germany 3-0 in 1/4 and finish third 1998, was very good
@@jackpuccini3143 4 years older, but was in much better physical shape in 1998. Baggio went into the 1994 WC carrying I believe an achilles injury. He picked up a hamstring/thigh strain in the semi against Bulgaria. As ever throughout his career, he performed miracles despite being almost crippled.
Roberto Baggio merecea ganhar uma copa do mundo
02:29 one of the smoothest ball control i've ever seen
Jamas en mi vida vi una ciudad en caos y protestas por 3 dias como paso en florencia cuando la fiorentina vendio a robi a la juventus crack roberto baggio
Italy coaches treated Baggio like shit his whole career. Didn’t use him to his best ability.
HE COULDNT USE HIM. GUY WAS INJURY PRONE WITH BAD STAMINA
LEARN HISTORY FIRST THEN U MAY TALK.
It’s a player the same calibre as Maradona
facts
@@PIP...33 Utter nonsense. When you have a world class talent, an all-time great, you have to both field that talent and give them the freedom to express themselves and not leave them to rot on the bench or not select them when they are available. His stamina wasn't a problem, and while he had a very tough time with injuries, he still managed to play many games (approx 699, scoring 318 goals) throughout his career and play up to the age of 37. Also, his goals and assists record for a number 10 was incredible. He did the business for Italy, Vicenza, Fiorentina, Juve, Bologna and Brescia. Yes, he had problems with injuries during his time at AC and Inter, but both teams at the time were in a mess, swapping managers every 5 minutes, and those managers often played Baggio out of position, setting him up to fail. And in spite of the mess in Milan he still was very important in helping Inter beat Madrid to qualify out of the CL group and beating Parma in the CL play-off., and helping Milan win the title in his first season there - I believe he made the most assists in Serie A that season.
Great Roberto Baggio !!!
Most of these guys played together in serie A league. Very hard to score on this game.
Se ' avesse giocato sempre sarebbe stato un' altra storia ,tutta colpa di un sistema corrotto della fifa .
Вот это был футбол!!!
Baggio much better than delpiero, but coach prefer the young stars
Italy were eliminated 3 consecutive times on penalties at the World Cup, and Baggio was involved in all 3 of them. I wonder what he thinks of penalties...
Um crack, merecia ter vencido a copa 94
3:54 ALBERTINI → BAGGIO R.
Baggio was not lucky with WC
he never lost the WC and he never won it.
90 lost semi by penalties,94 lost final by penalties and 98 lost quarter penalties again.
Ketika baggio masuk menggantikan Alex, serangan itali lbh bervariasi, bahkan jika hakim garis tdk berpihak pd tuan rmh,vieri bs sj bking golhasil assist baggio..voli baggio jika gol,, zidane dkk pasti akn menangis dibuatnya. Walaupun robi berhasil dlm eksekusi.. Tp rizki baggio dipiala dunia gagal
Ce match, bordel, quel stress de malade c'était!
Italia debió ganar ese mundial.
Cerco la partita completa...dove trovarla?
Baggio was born in wrong country . Italian coaches were stupid how they treated him
No se lo vio en buena forma..no era el baggio desequilibrante del 94
Avrebbe dovuto giocare ai Mondiali del 2002. Chi diavolo ha preso la stupida decisione?
Roberto baggio very best in italia 98 and 94 ,90,but delpiero very weak in italia especially 98 and euro 2000.
Incrível como pode Baggio ser banco do Del Piero em 98? Maldini louco...
Why was Del Piero subbed so early?
Because he was in terrible form and not so great physical shape. He was a shadow against France, it was if Italy was playing with 10 men. Baggio completely eclipsed Del Piero throughout the tournament. Cesare Maldini made a massive mistake in not starting Baggio in every game. He had been outstanding for Bologna, and was in the best physical condition of his career (he carried several injuries during 1994).
3:59 what if
Roberto Baggio > Zidane
Si metia esa volea hubiera sido como...minimo el segundo mejor gol del mundial despues. De el de, dennis bergkamp....por el grado de dificultad ,la fase que se jugaba y ademas gol oro.⚽🇮🇹🧞
Quel joueur quel souvenir ce joueur était fantastique mais la France la France avait Zizou
2:29
🙏
hubiera talvez sido el campeon de 1994. y quien sabe 1998. por penales Roberto e Italia perdieron .
1990 was the best chance for him...
Zidanne destruyo a los mejores baggio y ronaldo, es el dios
L’Italie a dominer les français faut le dire se jour là
Hey.. non preoccuparti d dove s va... ok? 😁
Brasil es una selección tan grande que tenia que dejarse ganar esa final porque les habían dicho que estaba prohibido que salgan bicampeones
Game needed some goals, soccer needs a mild redesign, keyword *mild*
I think he hurt this team more than help it. I thought the team that played the Nike tournament the year prior was perfect.
Nike tournament? Do you mean the 1997 Tournoi featuring Italy, France, Brazil, and England? If so, I strongly disagree. We finished 4th in that competition, bottom, losing to England, and despite drawing 3-3 with Brazil and 1-1 with France, we were lucky to get any points at all because we were outplayed in all 3 games.
During the 1998 World Cup, Italy played much better when Baggio was in the team. He was scoring and assisting goals and was a constant menace. Del Piero was in terrible form, largely due to not being fit, but even so, aside from that 'cherry-on-the-top' goal against Germany in 2006, Del Piero was largely disappointing for Italy; a shadow of the player we saw at Juve - who can forget those costly misses in the Euro 2000 final?
No, Baggio didn't hurt the team at all. He gave us some much needed imagination, penetration and excitement. Cesare Maldini hurt the team the most, playing with a very defensive midfield, playing the likes of Pessotto - a full back - in central midfield. Had Baggio started the game against France (as he should have against Argentina in the 1990 Semi-Final), or came off the bench earlier we would have had a much better chance of winning, and who knows, he might have put that volley away because he'd have been caught up even more into the pace of the game, more warmed up.
¿El árbitro era francés?