ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ค. 2024
- Dragon's Dogma 2 was a massive letdown for me and why I think left fans disappointed. In this video, I'll share what I liked and what I hated about the game for this review. Let's talk about the highs and lows of Dragon's Dogma 2! #dragonsdogma2
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @stillsolo - เกม
What did you like or dislike about the game?
Performance: it's so CPU intensive, and it overheated my PS5 😂
@@Builds777 oh man that sucks :(
im totally dissappointet that capcom reduced the equippable skills from 8 to 4 compare first game. and also they REMOVED the HYDRA, EVIL EYE and the COCATRICE. and of course also they split the strider from the first game into 2 classes. so overhaul right now, i think the first game is better
@@DerSchlachtherr 6 to 4
@@josevitorcalfa2 3 to 4 in case of the warrior.
As someone who played & loved the original game, this sequel was a mixed bag, like it takes multiple steps forward & sadly multiple steps backwards at the same time. For example, the map is 4x larger, but its also much more linear with the map predominately being a bunch of extremely long & narrow paths that zig-zag all over the map. This sequel adds a handful of new enemy types, but also removes the same amount of enemy types from the original. And I could go on & on. Ultimately its still a good game, but it makes so many minor mistakes that add up to a product that while good, is still disappointing. And I can't help but feel like this game originally had more content but was eventually removed so as to sell as DLC later. And this is Capcom, so its likely that this is exactly what they did. The RE4 Remake cut multiple things out of the original for the Remake that was later in the DLC.
I hear they cut monsters from the game like the hydra.
"Why Dragon's Dogma 2 Left Fans Diassappointed" - "I was one of those people that had not played Dragon's Dogma"
There's an issue with the title of the video, more accurate title would be "Why Dragon's Dogma 2 Left Me Disappointed" or "Why Getting Overhyped Is Bad".
It really is a shame you didn't have the 30 minutes that the Main quest of the first game takes (only sort of joking since that's the speedrun).
My main issues with the game are performance (I've got a 13 year old PC so can't expect miracles) and enemy variety. I am also slightly miffed about oversimplification (less skills, less armor slots (fashion), less weapon options (only 1 weapon per vocation, no rusted gear, etc.).
Yeah there's a ton of places they could improve
@@stillsolo Who are these they? 3 of the 4 paragraphs were about the video and issues it has, the last paragraph was about what I found to be a problem with DD2.
I agree!!!
What annoyed me the most is the stamina bar running down when not in battle. Why is it that the stamina bar is infinite in the towns but not in the world. Takes forever to get somewhere and becomes a slog
This is honestly one of the very few "legit" criticisms that are repeated often. Elden Ring could do it, so DD2 should've been able to as well.
It does sometimes sound like people are carrying way too much stuff when they go on their adventures though, the movespeed isn't that slow when you're light (and tall).
While sometimes I'd like to sprint longer I perfectly understand why you can't, it would be impossible to have the player run into a bad situation (surrounded by enemies when out of stamina) due to player choices if those choices weren't given to the player.
@@Syaniiti while that makes sense, "carrying too much" will almost happen inevitably over time.
@@KomradeKrusher and the fact that you can barely carry anything too before you become too heavy. Who wants to spend ages managing inventory and stamina bars lol
@@KomradeKrusher Which, I presume, is there to make you return to town sometimes. I personally don't feel like the carry limit is overtly punishing (but then I like my characters to not be tiny).
Same here bro, I finished the game and I felt kind of let down. I think they nail the vocations and combat, the map is indeed huge... but from all that hugeness you can't explore much beyond the roads, it is so lineal and there're a lot of areas you cannot access like 70% of the map is inaccessible. it's kind of fake open world...
After all the marketing and hype I was also expecting the cool battle system it actually has mixed with memorable stories, cities and characters like Skyrim or The Witcher 3 but it went halfway
Don't get me wrong they did some good things
oof your expectation of Witcher 3 + Sandbox, ouch not sure how you were sold that... I think you were disappointed because you expected a grand detailed story, but if you really beat it, you should now understand why everything felt so robotic, so monotonous... The only fun you had was when you created your own adventure, until you had to do what your role was, then it shifted to this robotic role... The game was really good at doing what it tried to convey, not sure how people missed it. You were the story, and you got played, over and over again.
I get that you were trying to go around stuff to not spoil the game. But it sounded like you didn't understand the pawn system, and modding the game to get the microtransaction is worse than if you spent money on them... The microtransactions are a jump start to the game, and they have limited purchases, they aren't infinite. Still it's not even pushed on you at all, not sure why people keep bringing it up.
I played as mage/sorc first and just like DD1 there is ways to decrease the casting time,
2 rings are in game which help to* decrease the casting time by a good margin.
But question for you @StillSolo, did you complete the game by sitting on the thrown at the end only?
Or did you also complete the game by doing the alternate ending which makes the story longer and
introduces more areas to explore?
DD2 has multiple endings, not sure if you knew this. One ending is with your Pawn if you get the affinity to max.
But thx for your video and your opinion on the game, I do hope they fix the lag in city other than that the game runs great for me.
the thing I didn't like the most is the way maelstrom became a targeted-only skill and not being able to choose the location on the floor, free targeting was soo good I feel it's really a disappointment that they didn't implement it.
I agree with your Review. i feel like you held back a bit on how disappointed you were tho to try and not offend a certain crowd but for the most part your review is accurate. I've been playing RPG games forever and this game felt like i picked it up and was done with it in the blink of an eye without rushing through it which is a feeling that I never got with an RPG game before. They already have DLC coming out for the game which makes me think they cut content to use as DLC. It took Elden ring how many years to make DLC for it? Balders gate 3 is so big that they don't even need DLC for it because it's already a complete game. Witchers 3 took a very long time to come out with DLC. This game seems rushed to me to try and capitalize on max profits. Anyone that is a RPG veteran can see what's wrong with this game. The game is fun but It basically left me feeling like there was so much more potential with it.
Great comment, I agree.
• Poorly written main story.
• Poorly designed quests that are unsuited for the kind of game it currently is.
• Poor worldbuilding such as way too many enemies, too few settlements, lazily made points of interests with little to no visual storytelling or lore.
• Lifeless boring NPCs with little to no characterization, let alone character development.
• Lack of world reactivity and consequences to your actions except for the drastic few at the end of game. Which feels disjointed and illogical asspulls due to the lack of foreshadowing and setup it had and how insanely apocalyptic it suddenly becomes.
@@DJWeapon8You're talking about level design - not worldbuilding.
@@Syaniiti when it comes to open world games with fantasy or science fiction settings like this, worldbuilding and level design is intertwined.
The location of a settlement or dungeon dictates the potential quests and stories you can make for it.
Inversely. The kinds of quests and stories you can make dictate the design of the settlements or dungeons you can put in the game.
@@DJWeapon8 Yes, level design is part of worldbuilding - but "too many enemies" is level design, "lazily made points of interests" is level design.
The culture, the history, the geography (that's your caves, mountains, city locations), those are worldbuilding. The races that inhabit the regions, how do they perceive each other? Have they been at war? How does trade function? All of that is worldbuilding.
Quests aren't worldbuilding, they are quests.
This all honestly just sounds like you had completely "wrong" expectations that weren't really promoted by the game or its ad campaign. It's like me hating COD because it's not like Doom.
i love dragons dogma dark arisen, the 2nd one is very good as well, yes it could have been better but its alright how it is i like it a lot, got over 100 hours explored all caves and unmoored world and i havent even beaten the game yet. some ppl complain bc its too short, dont listen to them its def not short if you expllore everything but i will say the story is kinda short but i still like it, and i wish they added the enemies from the first game, like hydra, evil eye, etc. The game is def worth it but ppl expected too much and ppl dont try to enjoy it they just wanna get it done with. game is great hopefully will win GOTY
yeap... Yeap we should expect DLC... they have more monsters to bring... People didn't understand the story, that's why they didn't like it. They don't understand the pawn's story either. Which means they didn't really pay attention, when they should've. and on Steam on 2.5% of all players have found 50 dungeons, 3.8% of people found 80 seeker's tokens, that just shows you how much adventuring people are doing. 20% of players didn't even make it to vernworth...
@_aPaladin exactly, the story is good not hard to understand but ppl don't pay attention, and just to let yk I was the first person to get the 50 caves tourist trophy 😎 I feel accomplished lol. It's a great game but ppl are just tiktok brainrot and are making it seem way worse than it is and it isn't
Glad you enjoyed it
I loved the first game and Dragon's Dogma 2 has been everything I expected and WAY more. I'm so happy that they didn't make it overly casual and easy in a Ubisoft/Assassin's Creed style way by having markers all over the map. So many side quests are ruthless (I've failed many of them and have had to try different strats on my 2nd and even 3rd playthrough to succeed). Graphics look amazing with everything set to max at 4K with ray tracing on my 4090. I'm 122hrs in and not even tried or levelled up all vocations. Very happy. 100% game of the year for me!
So I am, one those walkers/exploprers, rarely use speed travel. Was in a mood for exploring and discovring BakBatahl )i think). I roamed the land for some time. I was stuck on a mountain range and then I discovered a series of caves. I went through them with a fierc battle in everyone. 2 and half hours laters I found it to my delight. I was rewarded. But I had to fight fierce battles along the way to the city. Now I am so tired. I finished the sculptor quest. Then I realised to better nspeed travel, rather than fight another five hours on the same path. Ok, So I need a ferry stone, OK, I bought one. Then OK, but i need to come back here. No tport crystal, so they wanted me to buy a port crystal. That's when I stopped playing the game.
Small map? Dude you haven't explored the unmoored world or done the hidden caves. The map is huge and fulled with secrets. How much more can you want in a game? It's better to have a full map that isn't huge than a huge map which is empty. If you finished the main story in 6 hours then you don't know how to play rpgs.
compared to dd1 its still not enough, also monster variety is lacking they took away hydras, goregiants, and variant dragons hopefully they bring a proper dlc.
@@Thecjam I agree there but dd1 too didn't have much variety at launch and a ton of monsters were brought in the DA dlc. I'm sure they're going to add more especially since Itsuno said "there are 10 vocations in the base game".
Another thing Itsuno said was that DD2 is what DD1 was supposed to be with the things they had in mind. It's in a way a remake of the first game but it's still different. The rumor is that a dlc is coming out in November and is bigger than DA which speaks volumes since DA was a massive dlc in itself.
@@NKal A lot of the things were stripped away from that were in DDDA. To strip away something and sell them as a DLC, while the base game is already pushing close to 80 USD is not something I can get behind. And I am not even holding account the Performance or Microtransaction issues.
This game is a poor "sequel", it also seems to do a disservice to the original game's lore. If this is what DD1 was supposed to be? Then the future of this game is truly bleak. But hey... if they end up giving this game the Monster Hunter Iceborne treatment, then maybe it has a shot. Though, I doubt it.
@@Thecjam DD1 world is a small blip compared to DD2.
@@beardedfatcueball7368 ok, though I feel that games reaching a price tag of $70 are pushing it, one needs to also realise how much resources are being poured into the game. DD1 launched at $40 12 years ago and given the inflation throughout the years it's justified for good games to ask for $70. What's not justified is for gaming companies like Ubisoft and EA that push out shit games that are half finished and riddled with bugs to ask for the same price. DD2 released with almost no bugs and is a very well put together game.
People crying about performance is the dumbest. Games can easily be catered to current gen consoles but that would reduce the quality. 60fps isn't something easily obtainable on the PS5 or xbox since the hardware isn't well suited for high graphics and high fps. People just say things like in this day and age of your game can't run 60fps then it's not worth it while they understand nothing about how hardware limitations exist on consoles. It's not the game devs but the console to blame. Yes, some games can surely run on 60fps but they don't have as much going on in the game at a single point of time as DD2.
Games that one should be annoyed with for bad optimisation purely because it's not been done well is everything coming out of Ubisoft and EA.
I played the hell out of DD1 so I can confidently say, it's the superior game. The only thing DD2 does better is graphics, and maybe NPCs, tho they're still pretty robotic and soulless. The 1st game has a longer main quest line, more enemy variety, and even a more advanced combat system, with primary and secondary weapons/weapon skills. Feels like DD2 was a glorified demo of itself, lacking most of the care that the 1st game got.
Exactly. The systems were already there. Why change something for less.
The first game has a 30 minute mainquest (or 12 minutes apparently if you're good). Without DA DD had about the same amount of enemies as DD2 has, it's just that DD2 decided that some of the enemies do not respawn and a lot of them aren't used very well. So I'll deffo give you enemy variety. As for the combat system, I assume it has something to do with the fact that DD:online had the 1 weapon per vocation thing going.
Overall the game is simpler than the original and has less Guts & Griffin cosplays, 8/10.
Well said
Have you even played the game??
I beat the game
@@stillsolo it sure doesn't look like it. It seems the game beat you, I'm sorry to say.
As a DD veteran , this game is miles ahead of the curve . I swear , if the last minute microtransactions werent hidden from the playerbase and added at the last minute . Everyone would be praising . The only thing that i miss from DD1 is the more equipment slots like tabards and inner clothing .
And the Mythic knight. I think it was called that. I remember loving that vocation.
Mystic Knight > Mystic Spearhand. I just don't get spearhand as a vocation (could be because it's new and slightly more complex than trickster (the simplest vocation to ever exist).
I think it's the constantly holding rb while in combat, releasing it at the right time, holding lb, sucking off enemies (stamina), timed dodges, It's just too many buttons for me.
Performance is the biggest letdown for me. There are plenty of games out there which look as good or better on PS5, and they run fine. Helldivers 2 comes to mind. Solid, smooth 60 FPS even with explosions going off everywhere, looks great. DD2? Frequent dips into the teens. It's clear to me that the RE Engine wasn't designed to handle large open areas like this. I'm tired of studios making their own engines then shoehorning them into every game they make regardless of how suitable it is for the type of game being made.
Speaking of open areas, the game just isn't that open. It's nigh impossible to take overland shortcuts to most areas, and believe me I've tried. You stick to the paths, and can occasionally find a side area to explore. That's it. It qualifies as open world in the barest sense possible. Most 'dungeons' are just short caves with some loot at the end. They all use the same two tile sets and look like they're randomly generated with little care put into their design, with a few exceptions. Where are the labyrinthine tunnels? Where are the puzzles, the secret doors? Where are the unique bosses?
The story starts out fairly strong in act 1, but acts 2 and 3 render everything you did completely pointless. Almost none of it comes up again. The second act is very clearly rushed, nothing is explained, and the NPCs exist solely to hand out a quest, say a few lines, then disappear. We were told to expect better than DD1, and it's just not there. We were told there would be meaningful romances... nope. Same as DD1, just with a little cutscene thrown in. Meaningful choices? Nope! You fail a quest, and that's it. Says failed. No effect on the narrative, things play out the same.
I love the moment to moment game play, the vocations are all well designed and fun, and I'm still having fun because of those things, but the game just isn't what they told us we were getting. We got a badly implemented graphics upgrade, a slightly bigger world, and they got rid of a lot of the combat jank from the first game. That's it. Still a solid 7.5 for me, but GOTY material it certainly isn't. Those who think it is must have incredibly low standards which, given how bad AAA games are these days in general, is understandable.
Ive beaten this game 3 times and each play though was different the map is huge and once you go though post game post game is so much better also the map is actually huge compared to the first one
The story seemed to be short and had potential to be MUCH longer
I absolutely love the game I’m still not done playing but I love it so far my only complaint is the enemy variety it gets repetitive and boring fighting goblins lizards and wolves their color changes depending the area but it’s the same enemies
I absolutely love Dragons Dogma never played the first 1 but this game is huge I've been playing Thief mostly this Vocation is almost untouchable i absolutely love it
So far i have no issues except for graphical issue on Xbox Series S sometimes the mountains grass etc doesnt completely render but other then that the game is beautful granted if i played the first 1 i would understand why they would say first 1 is better i definitely want to 100% DD2 but its gonna take awhile cause 1 the game is huge theres allot to find and grind for and 2 brand new update for destiny 2 came out gonna be grinding that aswell 😂
best game i play for many years -- and i am are gamer
Everybody I talked to loved the game. Guess they haven't nerfed enough stuff for you to like it.
Everyone I’ve talked to says it’s terrible 🤷. No need to throw shade at a person because they differ in opinion.
@@dreadedscrub1207 Nah it was more of a rib because he LOVES when they nerf stuff in games. Also Stop trying to white knight for another man. If he has a problem he can speak for himself.
It's a brilliant game
@@austinshade7155 lol white knight… ok
Nerfed what exactly?
I’ve been playing for longer than I want to admit and love it, I’ve also played the first one and think this one improved on some things but it’s still very similar to the first
Fun fact you can romance your pawn =3
Expectations really do matter when it comes to new media no matter the medium (films, books, television, etc) so I'm not surprised to understand that the reason I and many others are happy with our purchase and you and many others aren't is because we had different expectations for what we were getting and for us they fell in line with Itsuno's vision for this product. So I won't blame you for having different expectations, people are different.
Thanks for sharing
I'm a fan of DD and DDII is just as good as the first game. I've been having a lot of fun.
glad you are enjoying it!
Game feels like a good framework to build upon. but a bit barebones in nearly all areas. Not so barebones that it is bad but lacking enough content to leave many wanting. This is very much a "wait for a sale and and expansion to get the full experience" kinda game. Exactly the same as the first one in this regard.
Hasn’t disappointed me
Nah fans love it.. casuals thought it would be better for inexplicable reasons
ive been a fan for ages but im really disappointed on the fact there is hardly any new enemies
Allergic to opposing opinions?
@alexis-js4wb yeah i wish there would be more too. Bit much to say i'm dissapointed when they gave us such an incredible game though
@stillsolo only when they make little sense, you didn't even play the first game so your not a fan yourself, how do you know how fans feel when it's really wel received among fans of the first game. It's the casuals who expected something else that are dissapointed. The fans are loving it 😅
@@taxicorky trust me bro there’s gonna be more people who do the same thing it happens a lot and I guess I’m allergic too 💀
I mean this with all kindness dude, but I feel like your expectations were way too high. Lets put aside the performance for the moment, which is terrible and shouldn't be, but in doing so we also have to accept that terrible performance on release has now become normal for all games at this point. Now moving on I'll keep it simple because I've already said a lot. Expecting it to be another Witcher 3? I've been gaming for 50 years, my first games were Frogger and Pong, Yeah, that long. I have to tell you games like witcher 3 are generational, as in once per generation. I hope one day after time as passed you can come back to this game and love it for what it is instead of -hate it- being disappointed for what it isn't.
The witcher world had depth, I think that what he meant by it. Witcher 3 did raise bar for these types of games and BG3 raised the companion dialogue bar, I think thats why this game feels alittle bland
@@spooky_zen Games should be critiqued in their own space separate from games that were made for their own separate reasons, Dragons Dogma 2 is one of the best games ive played in a long time because of the way it feels to play and rewards you for exploring. The Witcher 3 is one of the best games ive played because the world is so alive and the way its presented makes it feel and gives it a sense of depth that other games dont. Could dragons dogma 2 have better storytelling? Yes, if youve played a capcom game you shouldve expected a mediocre story, same way I expect shallow and weightless combat when playing the Witcher. Both games are similar but different enough to where they shouldnt overlap with each other in the areas they exceed in. Also again how come no one has mentioned how much better Dragons Dogma 2 is from a combat/gameplay perspective i mean, lets be real
@@gooserabbit331 For me, every game starts as a 10/10 and as I experience issues with it the score falls. Hence why I gave DD2 an 8/10 (enemy variety and performance issues).
I guess I just got spoiled with games like BG3, Witcher 3 and Elden Ring. But at least those games didn't have 10 FPS in major cities.
@@gooserabbit331 without the story whats the point? just not my style of game.
For people who never played the original and don't know anything about the series, but wants to play DD2, Dragons Dogma is a perfect mix of Devil May Cry with Monster hunter over a medieval fantasy setting. My advice for people who want to play this game is, if you like DMC and MH, go, focus on the fights and have fun. DD is about THE FIGHTS like DMC and MH. The rest is around the combat just to add some complement to it, but don't expect anything revolutionary. If you don't like DMC and MH, and stylish combat is not your jam, stay away form DD.
Im going to play the first game and check it out
I agree the Npcs in the world are paper thin if the performance was not the focus that would be one of the major things that should be fixed about the game. we'll def be geiing ,ore monsters that's what most people are asking for. xD
Yeah id love to see more variety with bigger monsters
Correct point, wrong conclusion. I think that 3 cities and 5 towns is a perfect number, my only problem is that it takes an hour to travel to each one. The world should be smaller
Fair enough
Trickster vocation is a Troll class. Warefarer class is retarded with only 3 skills to choose from. End game shouldn’t be timed. Difficulty is not apparent. Biomes should’ve had snow. It’s a solid 6/10 I got 200 hours in and most of the time you’re mindless when doing anything lol also lack of monsters and you can’t move 20 feet without being mobbed by the same type of enemies. Also performance and pop in is in need of fixing. Dragons dogma 1 had a better skill dynamic with left and right bumper adding more skills depending on if you had a shield. Idk I like the game but that’s because games have been shyt recently so it keeps me happy for now. OH AND ADD A FLIPPING LOCK ON BUTTON, IM TIRED OF MY ARCHER SHOOTING ROCKS WHEN MY CAMERA DECIDES TO RECENTER ITSELF.
Hate to be the one to break it to you but the first DD didn't have a lock on....
See, alot of people complain about the times post game and I don't get it, you can literally evacuate all the people, put however many hours you want into exploration and I mean infinite amount, then you can close all the beams. Its only on the last beam that you end up in new game plus. Know ya know
@@fletcherplumb8826 From what I've heard you're limited to 12 rests in postgame. Then again since weird pustule dragons don't seem to respawn there ain't much to do in it so 12 rests is more than enough.
@@fletcherplumb8826 it’s not about time to complete it’s the fact the map opens up and it would be nice to continue farming where monsters responds
Euh, what is that title. I’m a fan, and very much not disappointed. Doesn’t mean I’m blindly happy either. Still respect your opinion though :)
Thanks! If you look at steam reviews tons of people are not happy
@@stillsolo True, true. Mostly for performance and not very useful « micro transactions » which Capcom has always had in their games (i.e. MHW). Thank you for the video, still very informative 😁
Honestly the only people i see complaining didn't do or pay attention to half the stuff the game has to offer.
Less than half, even. I played the first game for years and here I spent over 30 hours before even reaching Battahl.
@@KomradeKrusher same here lol it's just obvious some people just ran thru the game but me I'm taking my time to enjoy it.
Yeah they didn't watch the whole video
I watched the whole video thats how I know you zoomed thru and missed a TON of stuff.
@@Clintdaddy412 So Im supposed to invest 1000 hours in a game before Im allowed to have an opinion on a game? You dont need to put in hundreds of hours to figure out if a game is good or not. You sound like those dudes who are like "Bro you need to play for 500+ hours then trust me it gets good" thats dumb.
I'm surprised that you didn't mention the CONSTANT nagging of the pawns, pretty much have to mute them when entering a town
True
Yes, the world is small as s***, it's a shame. 40% water 40% innccessible mountains, 10% corridors 10% deadends. Copy/paste caverns with Rotten Hardspud at the end. Oh waw! So many unused space just to release some DLCs later. Super boring -_- I'll never buy a game from Crapcom again AND i'll never buy a game full price again from any company nowadays. It's a business based on hypes, Everything looks amazing until you play it and realize it's trash in 6 hours.
Cant take this review swriously. You didn't even finish the the first one? Then ur gonna tell us why we didnt like it?
So I have to play the 1st game before I can play the 2nd? What?
Dunno. DD2 is bigger and prettier than DD1. But otherwise it is 1:1 the same. So if you were a fan of DD1...
If you account for what the game itself tells you, DD2 is accessed by doing a certain choice when meeting the Dragon in the game that this video is about.
LMAO..go back to cod.. DD2 is awesome and I'm not disappointed at all.. to many keyboard warriors rushing the game and then making cry baby TH-cam videos.. maybe mod it or something..
This was meant for the disappointed cry baby's not the video maker
o.o
yall mofos cry even when the game good its just sad af
Facts 💯
You can enjoy a flawed game
3 playthroughs of DDDA, normal, hardmode and speedrun for the platinum. Literally did everyhting. Got platinum after 86 hours from DD2 and I still feel the urge to play it, it was so good. Literally made everything better from the first game but still felt just as good from game mechanics perspective, true Dragons Dogma experience. Got few "casual" friends who cant fathom to play Souls games nor the first DD, they just bash this one for being clunky and weird. Cry about marginal and useless microtransactions etc. Thats what sheeps do, someone else told them to think this way.
Your a sheep if u don't like micro transactions?
@@stillsolo dude I didn't even know we're to get the micro transactions. They are freaking rift stones u can get those so easy, they are literally just for hiring better pawns. It's not even a big deal it's like the transactions don't even exist it doesn't affect it game, I honestly don't get it. I had more rift crystals by endgame than I knew what to do with. And the graphics thing? I'm playing on a PlayStation 5 uhd TV and game looks good to me, then again I never cared bout graphics as long as it's fun, pokemon for examples. Graphics suck but who cares. You must be a PC guy. Seems all the cryin comes from those guys.
People complaining about the micro-transactions is kinda lame… yes it shouldnt be in there..that i agree but the difference with DD2 is that it is not mandatory or it is not pay to win… you’re basically just paying for convenience of having items for fast travel or revive stones…… those. You can get in game and as you mention there is a mod to fix it.. so with that the micro transaction is pointless.. if one buy from it, thats on them.. doesnt affect me
Paying for convenience micro transactions are the worst kind. It's like the 5 dollar bonus exp from assassins creed oddyssey. You have been conditioned to accept this kinda stuff and it will just get worse unless it gets lots of pushback.
@@stillsolo dont get me wrong, i oppose the micro transaction. However, i know enough not to partake on it, in this game
Why are you stuck on romance. JUST play the game.. Or get a wife
I'm seeing someone yes
Red death 2 is soo Boring
Is it the 2.5+ million fans that bought the game already who are disappointed orrrr....🤔
It couldn't be half the reveiws on steam are mixed. 🤔Or the Metacritic user score being 6.3 🤔
@@stillsolo And somehow still getting great sales as a big success, those same reviews amounting to jack shit i see 🥴.
Absolutely dumbass you can’t be disappointed with a game unless you’ve played it and you can’t play it unless you’ve bought it. Kinda like half the people that bought red dead two returned it
@@duveysgamingacademia6587 i bought it have fun but it didnt felt as amazing as dark arisen and that game is older, we have 6 skills to pick from, bigger weapon variety, more enemies. i remember runing away like a chiken each time reaper will show up. grigori has better screen time and feels so much better as the dragon. i though they will build upon that instead they ignored that. dd2 feels rush for the fiscal closure and i believe that was like that because, they want to give monster hunter more time on the oven, they switched places.
Troll reviewer / disliked
Agree, the game was great. I like how the 'reviewer' states that he added mods so he cheated. Also his whole video has a white hue/too much brightness. LOL
Epic F A I L.
Reeeeeee
I wanted to like DD2 since I loved the first one, but I found DD2 to be pretty boring. It running like crap on ps5 doesn’t help, it fried my original console gave it green screen of death. Only thing I think the game has going for it is the combat but even that gets repetitive. I want to beat it because of the money I spent I just don’t see me beating it tho.
did you notice the intro start screen is just Dragon's Dogma? I wonder why...
I mean, Dragon's Dogma 2 has limited rests and is pretty short because of that. like 8 quests total too...
Its not a small map. Normal people enjoy the game. Stop the click bait crap band wagon.
👀