Fantastic video. My redline dribbled down too, and I can see quite clearly from it the gap I need to close in my game. I've been aware that I need to think in ranges, but this really shows how to apply that in a practical context. The notion that I have a strong range, but a bad hand within that range, so we must, must, MUST bluff is a big insight for me.
The Piosolver analysis of the JT hand is so valuable... Not bluffing these spots is possibly your entire winrate gone. The 3.x bb you lose in EV is against the solver, when you're playing against pool/individual players, you probably lose more than that because pool is scared of the big bad K and underprotects their turn checkback range, i. e. they will overfold against jam. edit: btw I love Jess as a student. She's perfect for this series. Keep it up and I hope to see her crushing 50nl soon!
@8:00 Stopped and ran this through Equilab cuz I was guessing at least closer to 80% equity there and the river is just as good if not better for your range. Should be quite recognizable how favored your range is in that spot. Especially vs a flatting range. A bit odd to say that villain is flatting AA, KK, AKs, AKo, even JJ at 300bb deep, and you cut such a good chunk out of the top linear parts of their range and his 4b bluff range too. Even just running HJ vs EP standard ranges and taking out the top linear hands and some Qx in villains range, you're whole range is 57% favored on every street even at the river 61%. But running the specific hand QQ is 79% favored and even 89% at the river. Even after filtering villains range, your range doesn't even change, still 79% taking out all draws and giving villain AJs ATs, KJs, KTs as best overcards, A5s for best Ax drawing hand, 77-TT. So few Kx Jess needs some practice calculating equity, just learning to roughly guess with an equity trainer. I'd be making the 3B size bigger, another coach I study says treat small openings as if they were 2.5bb or 3bb (whichever is standard for your stake, probably doing 2.5bb at 25nl more commonly) and always go 3x or just make it 9bb consistently even if they open 2.2bb.
lol I would just minraise that river, villain is so capped and betting like a fish who is scared to put money in and a Kx hand that manages to get there at the river is probably gonna X-trap a good portion of the time. You raise small to say "I know how weak you are, you're gonna call small because you are telling me you can't fold middle pairs or are dumb enough to call with A hi, but if you've actually got a Kx hand then you are forced to shove me" I love the impersonation concept. Used to do this years ago when I wanted to know how other people thought, so I'd just imagine I was them and it does help give a better perspective to your train of thoughts. You really just need to learn what information is being given in the language of poker and listen to people, believe the player type for who they are.
I gutta say dude literally less then 3 minutes in and i was like wow this dude. So smart man. I recently felt my results (took couple weeks to notice) controlling my mood and life outside of poker
I Started learning Poker a couple weeks ago, and your 1 on 1 coaching videos are the perfect mix of instructive and entertaining enough to keep my attention
Another thing is that fish bet a turn like this to see where they are at with hands like TT. I wouldn't raise QQ even though it is the best hand 90% of the time, since only hands that beat it will call and most likely TT will fold.
HAHA that intro. Nice video again. I always assess my sessions based on some specific goals. For example: Attack small flop cbets by regs because they over cbet or fold marginal hands against river raises because they underbluff
omg the qq fold, checking low flush draws is a good habit cos we dont really want all the money going in when we hit, especially on a paired board, i personally love having a strong checking range, cos regs like to bet too often with air and we can easily call 2 streets with our draw and donk favourable rivers
One Thing I think you should do more of Peter is when Looking at Node favorability, You should bring up the Range explore so that we can look at the Distribution of equity that makes up the EV of the Node . Otherwise Excellent video as usual.
Hey Pete, great Series, helps me a ton. Quick questions in terms of when to use pot odds and when to use equity, I am aware, EQ is useful when a) one player is all in, because once we call we realise all our EQ but, b) when we face a river bet, because we can determine our pot share and do not have to worry about further streets? I was using pot odds for river calls. Assuming b is true, do we than essentially use pot odds to justify flop & turn calls, assuming we correctly assess the opponents bluffing frequency and determine our calling range from that?
A really good take away is: King is always a good card for the agressor ( in theory), so we should be more agressive than passive when this card hits the table. Would you agree Peter?
Hey! I think you'd be interested in this. Charlie Carrell is doing his bankroll challenge and so far he CLAIMS to have 22.5bb/100 WR over 26k hands post rake (pre rb). You can see it on his latest twitter post. Then I decided to run a quick PrimeDope sim. If we assume he is truly a fucking 9bb/100 winner, then he is around 98.5% likely to run below his "current" 22.5bb/100. So maybe his TRUE wr is likely more like 13bb/100? That's fkn impossible. You might want to make a video on your yt channel exposing this scammer.
Holy shit... . I never got why players on gg show one card....often not even a relevant one . Never knew you could see both in HH if you do that. Thanks Jess
Love this series. With Jess playing the same stake as me, I feel like I get a little coaching for free every video. Keep up the great work
Pete definitely loves an animal analogy.
Fantastic video. My redline dribbled down too, and I can see quite clearly from it the gap I need to close in my game. I've been aware that I need to think in ranges, but this really shows how to apply that in a practical context. The notion that I have a strong range, but a bad hand within that range, so we must, must, MUST bluff is a big insight for me.
The Piosolver analysis of the JT hand is so valuable...
Not bluffing these spots is possibly your entire winrate gone.
The 3.x bb you lose in EV is against the solver, when you're playing against pool/individual players, you probably lose more than that because pool is scared of the big bad K and underprotects their turn checkback range, i. e. they will overfold against jam.
edit: btw I love Jess as a student. She's perfect for this series. Keep it up and I hope to see her crushing 50nl soon!
Recently started my own TH-cam bankroll challenge, your videos have been great! just subscribed ! thanks
@8:00
Stopped and ran this through Equilab cuz I was guessing at least closer to 80% equity there and the river is just as good if not better for your range.
Should be quite recognizable how favored your range is in that spot.
Especially vs a flatting range.
A bit odd to say that villain is flatting AA, KK, AKs, AKo, even JJ at 300bb deep, and you cut such a good chunk out of the top linear parts of their range and his 4b bluff range too.
Even just running HJ vs EP standard ranges and taking out the top linear hands and some Qx in villains range, you're whole range is 57% favored on every street even at the river 61%. But running the specific hand QQ is 79% favored and even 89% at the river.
Even after filtering villains range, your range doesn't even change, still 79% taking out all draws and giving villain AJs ATs, KJs, KTs as best overcards, A5s for best Ax drawing hand, 77-TT. So few Kx
Jess needs some practice calculating equity, just learning to roughly guess with an equity trainer.
I'd be making the 3B size bigger, another coach I study says treat small openings as if they were 2.5bb or 3bb (whichever is standard for your stake, probably doing 2.5bb at 25nl more commonly) and always go 3x or just make it 9bb consistently even if they open 2.2bb.
lol I would just minraise that river, villain is so capped and betting like a fish who is scared to put money in and a Kx hand that manages to get there at the river is probably gonna X-trap a good portion of the time. You raise small to say "I know how weak you are, you're gonna call small because you are telling me you can't fold middle pairs or are dumb enough to call with A hi, but if you've actually got a Kx hand then you are forced to shove me"
I love the impersonation concept. Used to do this years ago when I wanted to know how other people thought, so I'd just imagine I was them and it does help give a better perspective to your train of thoughts. You really just need to learn what information is being given in the language of poker and listen to people, believe the player type for who they are.
30:30 Did you have this sim 775tt SBvBU 3BP already pre-built? Or did you run it on the fly during the coaching session?
I'm assuming it's in your pre-built library but want to confirm.
More great content from Pete and Jess! I love the post-session accountability tracking recommendation - I plan to incorporate that tool.
This format continues to help me plug leaks in my game. Amazing content Pete, keep it up!
I gutta say dude literally less then 3 minutes in and i was like wow this dude. So smart man. I recently felt my results (took couple weeks to notice) controlling my mood and life outside of poker
I Started learning Poker a couple weeks ago, and your 1 on 1 coaching videos are the perfect mix of instructive and entertaining enough to keep my attention
Pete is a very funny guy if you pay attention when he is talking.
Also a very good coach / guy who wants better poker players.
Another thing is that fish bet a turn like this to see where they are at with hands like TT. I wouldn't raise QQ even though it is the best hand 90% of the time, since only hands that beat it will call and most likely TT will fold.
HAHA that intro. Nice video again. I always assess my sessions based on some specific goals. For example: Attack small flop cbets by regs because they over cbet or fold marginal hands against river raises because they underbluff
omg the qq fold, checking low flush draws is a good habit cos we dont really want all the money going in when we hit, especially on a paired board, i personally love having a strong checking range, cos regs like to bet too often with air and we can easily call 2 streets with our draw and donk favourable rivers
One Thing I think you should do more of Peter is when Looking at Node favorability, You should bring up the Range explore so that we can look at the Distribution of equity that makes up the EV
of the Node . Otherwise Excellent video as usual.
"horrible fish does this ...DUMB HORRIBLE FISH .... 'recreational'....pffff". This had me laughing so hard 😂
Such a great video, thanks Pete. I find myself always commenting on your videos, sorry for the repetitiveness but you inspire me ✌️
What happens when you get called when you shove the TJcc on the 7756K. What if villain calls with 88-JJ and occassionaly a K or a lost 22-44
Hey Pete, great Series, helps me a ton. Quick questions in terms of when to use pot odds and when to use equity,
I am aware, EQ is useful when a) one player is all in, because once we call we realise all our EQ
but, b) when we face a river bet, because we can determine our pot share and do not have to worry about further streets? I was using pot odds for river calls.
Assuming b is true, do we than essentially use pot odds to justify flop & turn calls, assuming we correctly assess the opponents bluffing frequency and determine our calling range from that?
That Chelsea analogy isn't looking so solid this year 😇
A really good take away is: King is always a good card for the agressor ( in theory), so we should be more agressive than passive when this card hits the table. Would you agree Peter?
trueEVE is reaching full equity realisation.
Please, make a vídeo about the top real life applicable solver heurístics
Very VERY educational
Thank you soo much.,
May yhe Lord Bless you
Hey! I think you'd be interested in this. Charlie Carrell is doing his bankroll challenge and so far he CLAIMS to have 22.5bb/100 WR over 26k hands post rake (pre rb). You can see it on his latest twitter post. Then I decided to run a quick PrimeDope sim. If we assume he is truly a fucking 9bb/100 winner, then he is around 98.5% likely to run below his "current" 22.5bb/100. So maybe his TRUE wr is likely more like 13bb/100? That's fkn impossible. You might want to make a video on your yt channel exposing this scammer.
Holy shit... . I never got why players on gg show one card....often not even a relevant one . Never knew you could see both in HH if you do that. Thanks Jess
Looking forward to when I see "river blunder theorum" in the CPS lectures... although now I'll have that horrid reverb voice saying it in my head lol
Maybe it would be good for Jess to only play 1 table of zoom. It helps to really engage in every hand.
Keep it up!
I know her from twitch
Win small pots and lose the big pots