@@subie1019 I think the design of this hunter requires a lot of electronics. So air con would be pretty important. Otherwise equipment would overheat easily ?
Saw the other version with armor covering the track as well. ST Kinetics has come a long way... from just inventing a short cqb weapon for small-sized singaporeans to this.
@@Benjamin-wy4dj definitely got more potential both technology and policy wise. We need a high morale n disciplined army of conscripts. Something that they will be proud of n not just consider NS as a sai kang life.
@@thecommentssquads2804 enough for what? You think if china throws down a little toy gun like that is gonna do anything lol. The koreans got it right with the 40mm, they got the hook up because they might need it. If you got an Abrams tank a f18 and an Apache helping you then a 30mm is okay. If you dont have that kind of big boy help then you dead with that 30mm you wouldnt last 10 minutes in syria or yemen
@@connortb1229 i don't think SAF will be deploying in middle East anytime soon.btw SAF never fighting any real enemy..so this is more than enough for them.
Should make unmanned fighting vehicles.....with Google-type self-driving technology, every 3 vehicles working in a cluster, with local AI assisted tactical control plus manned remote control. Then SAF can have more fighing capability than its personnel numbers allow. One team of 4 personnel can command a cluster of 4 to 8 fighting vehicles, some vehicles are large to carry heavy weapons, some are small and fast, replacing infantry support, and perhaps even half a dozen airbone drones to observe the battle field. At least, it can pack enough fire power to pin down a larger unit while the tanks and air assets go in for the kill.
If anyone who has driven an armored vehicle hull down would know you cannot see shit through vision blocks or periscopes this vehicle would be big step forward in combat effectiveness.
Ya that's why we drive open-hatch, but that one only in camp. Outfield we drive closed-hatched so have to depend on the limited vision of periscopes and the VC commands.
@@nadzrinpuad1283 we are not at that stage yet. We still yet employ armed unmammed drones like UCAV, UCSV etc... All of these are still in development. Even armed, they are still limited in effectiveness. An MQ-9 reaper is suitable for providing support in less battle intensity situations. If deployed in hostile areas with high density of sams, it will fail. Just looked at how iran simply shot down an RQ drone though unarmed out of the sky like that. We still dont see any UCAV capable of aerial combat yet. We are still far too that level of automation Digital is just an improvement of data transmission to simply put. What you need is the hardware and better machine learning. you heard of new terms coming up now IOT, smart nation, 5G networks, industry 4.0, systems of systems, A.I. , data analytics/science, ML, Quantum computing. we are just getting started and so is the world and we r not advance as the superpowers remember that.
General looks like reading something infront of him. His eyes are peers lock on a sheet of paper and at the end, probably his superior gesture to him to smile and dont look like a potato.
its not a new idea. Many modern armoured vehicles in US/Germany/Singapore/Israel now have digital touch screens. It allows shared data and moving situation map between platforms. Singapore has been using such technology for almost 10 years now.
@@samu9228 Are you aware that a NEMP is a Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse? It happens when detonating a nuclear warhead in the atmosphere. That's brings much bigger problems than just a EMP.
The design and layout is very promising , but it looks like heavily modified and deep developed Yap-25 with armour shield , redesigning turret , improve armaments , A new command and driving system , the platform are fully automated and digitalized to increase the flow and exchange of information and to improve the command and control system self , sub , centralize (tactical and operational , with singapore geography the size of the armed forces it called defence forces and the digitalization of all its branches of also at strategic level ), but there is no ATGM ????
@@Benjamin-wy4dj Understandable for many similarity in geopolitical situation for the both states , beside exporting military knowledges , experiences , and hardwares was the main export products for the zionist entity , they use it as an important means to penetrate the military and security establishments , making money and intervene and create a pressure groups strengthen their political influence . As well as the export of agricultural products from agricultural kibbutzim , the third elements is the banking system , the fourth elements is exporting intelligence and security knowledges and now they add the cyber in security ....
Have faith. Our bronco aka warthog in UK version has seen combat in Afganistan and had garnered some very good feedbacks on its troop protection capability and reliability in combat situation. Just import all that statistic into our future APC design
more air defense system ground to air need to protect your infantry The war in modern times is now you will be 🔥 from a distance.using vehicles in the open space on the battlefield very easy to be targeted especially from air to ground missile.
waste taxpayer money.. defence budget so much for what? who are our enemy? govt set aside low on healthcare budget for the elderly and entire population. thats the reason why healthcare is so high and expensive, yet nurses and medical workers are being paid so low..
Theres no real enemy anymore. After ww2 there wasn't any madman wanting to take over the world. Most countries should scale down their military's and use that money on the civilian sector.
@@deschan2246 defitnely alot safer. Modern day design engineers are more concious about safety and ergonomics but then there will always be risk. A soldier can get his arm stuck if the back door closes and crushes his arm. True? His leg as well. To me the primus incident is not just about vehicle design, but human behaviour. For years there was 0 incidents involving the vehicle. Human factor was at play. If vehicle design was at fault, there would have been numerous accidents and incidents by now. One example is the V 22 Osprey. A revoultionary design that comes with great risk as it is a complete new concept. Of course the Primus incident although is in truth human behaviour and human error, if there is a way to reduce its likehood of repeat incidents, then implement it. Like warning stickers and markings which can get ur attention. In the end these warnings are just there to show. The human must comply and adhere. One can choose to ignore and disregard or not take his/her work seriously. True? At the end these warning stickers and markings serve to remind you the human. Whether u choose to follow is your choice (the human). For years primus had a decent record only because people remember to follow proper instructions by being told and not through oh there is a sign or sticker. Of course there is a high possibility that it has happened before but just that no accident happen and people were lucky. It sure happens in every industry. Unfortunately not so for the recent accident. Now with markings and stickers, i see no excuse should people choose to disregard their safety. Dont give excuses like never tell or say. For years people can follow proper instructions without markings so this time better not happen.
@@Benjamin-wy4dj Disagree. A truely safe proof vehicle interior will not hv accident regardless of what the crews do internally (in short it has to be idiot proof).
@@Benjamin-wy4dj A vehicle interior safety rely on human positon is not safe proof. To err is Human . Such unsafe vehicle is a time bomb waiting for accident to happen. If it does not happen to the actor, it will hit someone one day. The long accident free period mean nothing.
@@jonny2954 trooper b4 throwing mud, throw molotov 1st.. Hahaha troopers? Damn u right john.. I forgot it got thermal imager, night v, satelite prob imager, dron surveillance system
@@poasun1971 Yes it is a good design but i would say it is attributed to the improvements of design and technology. Bradley was very good back in the days. Having an ATGM on it was quite revoultionary in itself.
@@Benjamin-wy4dj did you ever watched the pack of abu sayyaf snipers how they do operates and fights against soldiers... In the mountains... And hill sides.... They sniped even the smallest censors, camera, radio antenna... any kind of specs built-in outside the fighting vehicle
@@nanterey88 it makes no sense to me really. Look at it this way. Traditionally, vehicles use your usual optics/ scope or enclosed canopy to see what is going on on the outside. If what u say is even true, what is the difference then? Be it cameras or glass? A sniper can just shoot it. So to me what u say makes no difference at all. A camera is a sensor. A glass window itself is more or less the same. To me a sniper can still destroy it. Correct? Or lets take it even further back in time. Just a small window/opening like the tanks of ww2. The sniper will just shoot at it? Right? A vehicle commander sitting on top? Same he is as good as dead? So what u say does not matter as the end result is pretty much the same. The Hunter itself has a redundancy. It uses cameras and the usual window/optics. Shoot let say the camera does down. So going by your point. It is might as well good that we just throw away vehicles altogether as they are of use? You are over exeggerating the claim of snipers. Snipers are good but to maintaim consistent accuracy on a sensor of a moving vehicle is not possible. Again humans. If a sniper can do that. A man with a gun. What about the guy in the hunter? These cameras are thermal imaging and can see better than your human eye. The gun and camera could out range a sniper. If ur claim that all these cameras are of no use, it is the same for scopes. Then what are militaries doing then? They know better. They know the threats and try to anticipate and overcome. If what you say is true then armoured warfare would be very different as militaries would need to adapt to such change. A pack of snipers would comprise their location at a certain area. A snipers strength is being alone quiet and hidden. Too many noise if u have many.
@@Benjamin-wy4dj the same nowadays the militias has their own advanced scope.... they got advance anti tank weapons also... In the battle fields we need heavy fully armored vehicle... Don't you observed a war in marawi. Best Skilled Snipers with advanced weapon system. Do the Victory. Not the fancy advance light armored fighting vehicle do the jobs.. it's expensive and has a very limited jobs in the real battle field. Just such a waste of time and money.
Yeah but I can comprehend it. Have you ever heard of a thick India accent...? I meant a real India guy who speaks English in India accent ( I am not talking about a Indian who grow up in Americas or in UK) and for some reason they speaks so fast. I have to tell them to slow down and take a breath. Sometimes I don't think they speak English at all. Their version of English is Inglish...spell with an i.
@@Goodvibes-no9rp An armoured fighting vehicle serves to combat other armoured fighting vehicles or infantry. Not tanks. Armoured division is not about all tanks only. Germans had a mix of tigers and panzers in their armoured warfare. If it is all big guns, a swarm of infantry would overwhelm you. A group of tanks where reload is necessary every time u fire would not be able to sustain such no.s Hence the use of an AFV. A tank will die if it works alone. Many examples u can see in the middle east where ATGM takes them out. Infantry needs to support them. Infantry needs the protection as well hence the AFV n IFV. Vice versa when AFVs & IFVs encounter tanks, they cannot take them out due to the smaller calibre of their gun hence where the Leo 2 comes in. To destroy another near equivalent force. However the strategy has change as the huntet itself is equiped with a pair of ATGMs. A new approach for the SAF.
No, that gun isn't meant to fight against main battle tanks, it's for light armoured vehicles/infantry. But it has guided missiles, so with that it can destroy an MBT.
@@wanasmav We represent no one but ourselves. Just like u a believer in KMT should believe in that and not think of others who believe in your ideals. You are who you are. Whats wrong with that. What is special is in Taiwan not here in Singapore. If not there is no unique or identity. Same for the DPP. Singapore is different from Taiwan same vice versa. You should be proud of that and be yourselve. Not think that others should be you. People came to Singapore during colonial eras. Ideals of KMT did not exists same for ours. We created ours after independence. Yours was once in China. The last bastion is Taiwan. That is truth. To say that my country is the last bastion is an insult to your very selves as there is no influence or whatsoever here. You say that to the leaders in KMT in parliment and you will have another wrestling match because the fact is they are who they are. Why think that we are u? Is it because you are looking for an escape? A safe haven? You are lying to yourselves. Taiwan is different and it should be kept it that way. Regardless of party who runs the country. However, we respect each other mutually and work towards common grounds. We work with like minded nations. Be it in the region or globally. That is diplomacy.
If this is for export from singapore then its good. But if its for singapore i think its not so much use, because if they have to use this to engage the enemy then it means the enemy has already landed on singapore shores with their weapons and infantry and armour,....... And singapore is such a small state with no land mass to have these aifvs maneouver against the enemy. I think singapore would be better served to have a much stronger external defence, on air and naval defence. Geography is just not on singapores side. The japanese knew that in ww2. Dont get me wrong though...... I see it as a good designed aifv.
@@zulwabule vietnam geographically far from malaysia, no point of conflict between vietnam and malaysia. Singapore armed to protect itself from threat named malaysia
@@thelight2893 You didn't understand my comment. A enemy infantryman will definitely waste his life trying to get close enough to this vehicle to throw paint at it. Do you know what a 30 mm HE round does to a human body? He's red mist. Life wasted.
@@jonny2954 Yeah, ever hear of paint ball? Can create similar to that with a long range for counter. Man this tank is trash. Very easy to counter. Bet you didn't though of that, oh wait, Morotic brain. Yeah, $$$ wasted
@@thelight2893 Stop embarrasing yourself, this isn't a tank, it's an Infantry Fighting Vehicle. It carries its own infantry squad in the back that dismounts for combat operation. Have fun fighting the vehicle and the infantry all at once while getting close enough to fire your fancy paintball gun at the cameras, just to discover that they still have analog periscopes as backup. Stop playing videogames in your mothers basement and join up, maybe you will learn how things work in reality.
Outdated st design old senior to keep his job , gov don’t dare to offence him he know too much mindef technology lol This senior don’t accept other new suggestions to implement the technology lol waste taxpayers $$ employ useless ST engineering lol do outdated weapon
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 83 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "พันฤทธิ์ vs ซุปเปอร์บอล วันของโอม MBK"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1b4pkKHa_Fk/mqdefault.jpg)
But the real Question here is.....
Does it have Wifi?
@oyeahyeah 4k 69fps for sure
Can it run PUBG in 120 fps?
@@flipmanlet8982 sorry m8 its so poorly optimised it crashed on its 1st frame
@@aerojetrocketdyners-2538 maybe their pc has weak processor and it needs more ram to run the game
@@flipmanlet8982 i mean pubg is poorly optimised
Too late. I have enjoyed sauna and dust filled air in the old M113
when the air con stops working, you can be sure the technician will not bother to fix it as it is not the priority
@@subie1019 I think the design of this hunter requires a lot of electronics. So air con would be pretty important. Otherwise equipment would overheat easily ?
Sean hmmm you could be right
Anyone from 40 SAR? Once Armour, Always Armour!
Another milestone achievement by the city state- Singapore. Congratulations!
Saw the other version with armor covering the track as well. ST Kinetics has come a long way... from just inventing a short cqb weapon for small-sized singaporeans to this.
N yet we still have a long way to go
@@Benjamin-wy4dj definitely got more potential both technology and policy wise. We need a high morale n disciplined army of conscripts. Something that they will be proud of n not just consider NS as a sai kang life.
But the most important thing is got aircon or not
Sophisticated cameras the great digitaiized armored fighting vehicle. Truely its amazing.
look like a recon vehicle pinpointing enemy strong point n directing battle tank n artillery fire....based on the tech savvy equipment inside...
Singapore Army : Fully Digitalised..bla bla bla
Enemy : Hold My EMP Blast
This vehicle is designed to kill "civilians" thats why its only got a tiny 30mm
@@connortb1229 i think that 30mm canon is enough that why its call infantry fighting Vehicles not a Tank.
@@thecommentssquads2804 enough for what? You think if china throws down a little toy gun like that is gonna do anything lol. The koreans got it right with the 40mm, they got the hook up because they might need it. If you got an Abrams tank a f18 and an Apache helping you then a 30mm is okay. If you dont have that kind of big boy help then you dead with that 30mm you wouldnt last 10 minutes in syria or yemen
@@connortb1229 i don't think SAF will be deploying in middle East anytime soon.btw SAF never fighting any real enemy..so this is more than enough for them.
@@thecommentssquads2804 i think the Philippines got hit how far from Singapore is that.
That Classic Singaporean Accent...
Chinesse+brittish+malayan
Singapore accent, yes. Classic, no
Sport seats for the troops 👍👍👍
Notice that the Teh Tarik hook is missing?
Can tell the gunner barrel doesn't have any stablize while moving.
Should make unmanned fighting vehicles.....with Google-type self-driving technology, every 3 vehicles working in a cluster, with local AI assisted tactical control plus manned remote control.
Then SAF can have more fighing capability than its personnel numbers allow. One team of 4 personnel can command a cluster of 4 to 8 fighting vehicles, some vehicles are large to carry heavy weapons, some are small and fast, replacing infantry support, and perhaps even half a dozen airbone drones to observe the battle field. At least, it can pack enough fire power to pin down a larger unit while the tanks and air assets go in for the kill.
If anyone who has driven an armored vehicle hull down would know you cannot see shit through vision blocks or periscopes this vehicle would be big step forward in combat effectiveness.
Ya that's why we drive open-hatch, but that one only in camp. Outfield we drive closed-hatched so have to depend on the limited vision of periscopes and the VC commands.
Does this have tank app?
Wonder if they use the same material of the tank and sew it into Kevlar body armour
Does it have feet massager installed?
I love Singapore.
Looks like a light tank and a bit similar to the Bradley armoured vehicle.
Ready for RoboMaster competition
Wait......this look like a Bradley........a upgraded version...........nice.........
I CAN SEE IT! THE FUTURE OF TERMINATORS ARE CLOSER
Can this cannon pierce through modern tank armour?
good la. fully digitalised then no need serve NS alr la.
Digitalised is not an equilavent to automated robots.
Even unmanned vehicles are controled by someone back at base.
@@Benjamin-wy4dj now all becoming digitalize. No need NS . Few special force enough to operate
@@nadzrinpuad1283 we are not at that stage yet.
We still yet employ armed unmammed drones like UCAV, UCSV etc...
All of these are still in development. Even armed, they are still limited in effectiveness.
An MQ-9 reaper is suitable for providing support in less battle intensity situations. If deployed in hostile areas with high density of sams, it will fail. Just looked at how iran simply shot down an RQ drone though unarmed out of the sky like that. We still dont see any UCAV capable of aerial combat yet. We are still far too that level of automation
Digital is just an improvement of data transmission to simply put. What you need is the hardware and better machine learning.
you heard of new terms coming up now
IOT, smart nation, 5G networks, industry 4.0, systems of systems, A.I. , data analytics/science, ML, Quantum computing. we are just getting started and so is the world and we r not advance as the superpowers remember that.
Singapore 🇸🇬 Military Armour Units Should Produce More of These Advanced Digitalised APC .
Should also produce more aircraft carriers too.
I'm just curious. Arent those sensors can be easily damage by sniper rifles with armor penetrating ammunition? Just curious.
@Zahir Datoo I see, i see. That makes sense.
It doesn’t even be possible to resist blast.
Why the need to put human inside the machine - why not make it fully robotic?
David Ho...it can b out of control n start friendly fires.
**Skynet Flashbacks**
Singapore Army's High-tech AFV(Armored Fighting Vehicle): *Exists*
EMP: *I'm about to end this man's whole career*
It have an amazing RGB lights
General looks like reading something infront of him. His eyes are peers lock on a sheet of paper and at the end, probably his superior gesture to him to smile and dont look like a potato.
If it hang while in battle?
touch pad is bad idea in heavily mobilized vibrating vehicle
its not a new idea. Many modern armoured vehicles in US/Germany/Singapore/Israel now have digital touch screens. It allows shared data and moving situation map between platforms. Singapore has been using such technology for almost 10 years now.
All it takes is only one EMP burst to bring down the whole battalion.
Those tanks have shielded isolated wiring that is designed for emp. Emp can't eliminate bandwidth frequency.
@@greenworld1259 But still EMP weapon able to kill this thing otherwise why Superpower Nation like usa and russian developing this weapons..
itsmeaidil So what, that would also bring down any modern fighting vehicle, they all have significantly high levels of digitisation.
So........ Who 's got emp weapons in their inventory right now........
@@greenworld1259can explain what is bandwidth frequency and how emp cannot eliminate it pls? noob ee here
Does the hunter have EMP protection?
All modern military electronics are EMP hardened. One of the reasons it's so expensive and heavy.
@@jonny2954 hmmm,then make stronger EMP
@@samu9228 NNEMP are drastically limited in their intensity and range compared to NEMP, and even NEMP won't harm military grade electronics.
@@jonny2954 then make it stronger
@@samu9228 Are you aware that a NEMP is a Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse? It happens when detonating a nuclear warhead in the atmosphere. That's brings much bigger problems than just a EMP.
Good job Singapore
The design and layout is very promising , but it looks like heavily modified and deep developed Yap-25 with armour shield , redesigning turret , improve armaments , A new command and driving system , the platform are fully automated and digitalized to increase the flow and exchange of information and to improve the command and control system self , sub , centralize (tactical and operational , with singapore geography the size of the armed forces it called defence forces and the digitalization of all its branches of also at strategic level ), but there is no ATGM ????
It does. It sits inside the turret and comes up. Search up samson 30 turret. It is by Rafael
@@Benjamin-wy4dj Cooperation between the Zionist entity and Singapore is not new ....
@@eagleeye6691 it hasnt. When we became independent they were the ones who helped us build the armed forces.
@@Benjamin-wy4dj Understandable for many similarity in geopolitical situation for the both states , beside exporting military knowledges , experiences , and hardwares was the main export products for the zionist entity , they use it as an important means to penetrate the military and security establishments , making money and intervene and create a pressure groups strengthen their political influence . As well as the export of agricultural products from agricultural kibbutzim , the third elements is the banking system , the fourth elements is exporting intelligence and security knowledges and now they add the cyber in security ....
So... its like the Bradley?
in what way... It looks completely different, has a different cannon, FCS, Engine, and practically different everything
The sound of the videos is not good
Where is atgm launcher??
The ATGM launcher sits inside the back of the turret and elevates to fire.
Try this is in real combat scenario.
Deploy it in Syria then!
@@kaptenhiu5623 yeah. test it first .
You know Singapore armoured vehicles have seen action in Afghanistan and Iraq?
Have faith. Our bronco aka warthog in UK version has seen combat in Afganistan and had garnered some very good feedbacks on its troop protection capability and reliability in combat situation. Just import all that statistic into our future APC design
It has very tiny pnesse
Good work singapore 👏👏👏 .From India
It has everything but firepower
I notice the suspension is lacking.
You guys got your money's worth out of these new m113 technically is most high-tech of its. United States love Singapore people
The 30 mm cannon not stabilised
Trophy？
Those sensors look like its mounted as an afterthought.
The Hunter machine must from Bradley tank
You know what is the grave weekness of these machine ? It's sensors, without it; it is useless. That the 'target' & it is an expensive one too...
more air defense system ground to air need to protect your infantry
The war in modern times is now you will be 🔥 from a distance.using vehicles in the open space on the battlefield very easy to be targeted especially from air to ground missile.
Aster30s
Spyder SR
Mistral
RBS-70 on v200 commando
9k38 Igla
9k38 mechanised Igla mounted on M113 with 6 missiles
If build by ST means buy parts from Sim Lim and other country and LEGO ah. If SW, maybe outsource to others....:)
waste taxpayer money.. defence budget so much for what? who are our enemy? govt set aside low on healthcare budget for the elderly and entire population. thats the reason why healthcare is so high and expensive, yet nurses and medical workers are being paid so low..
ST sells a lot of this equipment overseas....nothing to do with defence budget.
Rudy Lopez *china
Most countries have been raped. Im lucky to be from a country that hasnt been raped. You need weapons systems to not get raped by another country.
Theres no real enemy anymore. After ww2 there wasn't any madman wanting to take over the world. Most countries should scale down their military's and use that money on the civilian sector.
Did u forget that somebody was in our backyard(TUAS) a few months ago and claimed it as theirs
the reporter recording the general with an old sony phone lol
I think it might be a Sony audio recorder
Is it the interior safe proof?
Nothing is safe proof.
Even your car isnt. All it takes is an accident.....
@@Benjamin-wy4dj
Well internal must be safe proof. The last fatal incident involving the actor is a case of poor designed interior unsafe vehicle.
@@deschan2246 defitnely alot safer. Modern day design engineers are more concious about safety and ergonomics but then there will always be risk. A soldier can get his arm stuck if the back door closes and crushes his arm. True? His leg as well. To me the primus incident is not just about vehicle design, but human behaviour. For years there was 0 incidents involving the vehicle. Human factor was at play. If vehicle design was at fault, there would have been numerous accidents and incidents by now.
One example is the
V 22 Osprey. A revoultionary design that comes with great risk as it is a complete new concept.
Of course the Primus incident although is in truth human behaviour and human error, if there is a way to reduce its likehood of repeat incidents, then implement it. Like warning stickers and markings which can get ur attention. In the end these warnings are just there to show. The human must comply and adhere. One can choose to ignore and disregard or not take his/her work seriously. True? At the end these warning stickers and markings serve to remind you the human. Whether u choose to follow is your choice (the human). For years primus had a decent record only because people remember to follow proper instructions by being told and not through oh there is a sign or sticker.
Of course there is a high possibility that it has happened before but just that no accident happen and people were lucky. It sure happens in every industry. Unfortunately not so for the recent accident.
Now with markings and stickers, i see no excuse should people choose to disregard their safety. Dont give excuses like never tell or say. For years people can follow proper instructions without markings so this time better not happen.
@@Benjamin-wy4dj
Disagree. A truely safe proof vehicle interior will not hv accident regardless of what the crews do internally (in short it has to be idiot proof).
@@Benjamin-wy4dj
A vehicle interior safety rely on human positon is not safe proof. To err is Human . Such unsafe vehicle is a time bomb waiting for accident to happen. If it does not happen to the actor, it will hit someone one day. The long accident free period mean nothing.
The Hunter other transformasion from Bradley tank ini future
Where are they going to train ?same old place...
Australia with the new enhanced cooperation?
But got air con or not?
Have
Got playstation and gym also, some have full kitchen…
Battlefield? Where? War is not a video game, it's actual and eventually boots on the ground will be required to take and keep ground.
Afghanistan, or Iraq, where Singapore made armoured vehicles were deployed? Maybe Syria.
concerned that the driver will be blind once the cameras get damaged
U.S. in area 51: laughs
we have fockin plasma tanks that can bore through 5 foot of armor
Okay troopers!!! Aim for their armoured vehicle Camera turret! Aim for it!! Use mud!! Threw at it!!! Surely they'll stuck in blindlyness inside it!!
Okay troopers! Run towards a vehicle with thermal imagers and a 30 mm gun to throw mud at it! Troopers... Troopers?
@@jonny2954 trooper b4 throwing mud, throw molotov 1st.. Hahaha troopers? Damn u right john.. I forgot it got thermal imager, night v, satelite prob imager, dron surveillance system
I don’t see any anti tank guided missiles leh
Sitted inside the turret. It pops out and can retract
@@Benjamin-wy4dj Good design. The US Bradley has it outside the turret and subject to enemy fire anti armour round on it and rendered it useless
@@poasun1971 Yes it is a good design but i would say it is attributed to the improvements of design and technology. Bradley was very good back in the days. Having an ATGM on it was quite revoultionary in itself.
Meh. Im only riding this one if it's air-conditioning is inverter
🎯 sensor and cam 🎯 easy target for Sniper Barret
Try sniping a pack of hunters. They dont operate alone
@@Benjamin-wy4dj vice versa.
@@Benjamin-wy4dj did you ever watched the pack of abu sayyaf snipers how they do operates and fights against soldiers... In the mountains... And hill sides.... They sniped even the smallest censors, camera, radio antenna... any kind of specs built-in outside the fighting vehicle
@@nanterey88 it makes no sense to me really. Look at it this way. Traditionally, vehicles use your usual optics/ scope or enclosed canopy to see what is going on on the outside. If what u say is even true, what is the difference then? Be it cameras or glass? A sniper can just shoot it. So to me what u say makes no difference at all. A camera is a sensor. A glass window itself is more or less the same. To me a sniper can still destroy it. Correct? Or lets take it even further back in time. Just a small window/opening like the tanks of ww2. The sniper will just shoot at it? Right? A vehicle commander sitting on top? Same he is as good as dead? So what u say does not matter as the end result is pretty much the same. The Hunter itself has a redundancy. It uses cameras and the usual window/optics. Shoot let say the camera does down.
So going by your point. It is might as well good that we just throw away vehicles altogether as they are of use?
You are over exeggerating the claim of snipers. Snipers are good but to maintaim consistent accuracy on a sensor of a moving vehicle is not possible. Again humans.
If a sniper can do that. A man with a gun.
What about the guy in the hunter?
These cameras are thermal imaging and can see better than your human eye. The gun and camera could out range a sniper.
If ur claim that all these cameras are of no use, it is the same for scopes. Then what are militaries doing then? They know better. They know the threats and try to anticipate and overcome. If what you say is true then armoured warfare would be very different as militaries would need to adapt to such change. A pack of snipers would comprise their location at a certain area. A snipers strength is being alone quiet and hidden. Too many noise if u have many.
@@Benjamin-wy4dj the same nowadays the militias has their own advanced scope.... they got advance anti tank weapons also... In the battle fields we need heavy fully armored vehicle... Don't you observed a war in marawi. Best Skilled Snipers with advanced weapon system. Do the Victory. Not the fancy advance light armored fighting vehicle do the jobs.. it's expensive and has a very limited jobs in the real battle field. Just such a waste of time and money.
Lol that nerdy Singaporean accent.
uniquely singapore my brother
Yeah but I can comprehend it.
Have you ever heard of a thick India accent...?
I meant a real India guy who speaks English in India accent ( I am not talking about a Indian who grow up in Americas or in UK) and for some reason they speaks so fast. I have to tell them to slow down and take a breath. Sometimes I don't think they speak English at all. Their version of English is Inglish...spell with an i.
@@cosmoray9750 Sounds similar. Inglish
Small gun only?
U want big gun you have the Leo2s and primus. 120mm and 155mm
U want a bigger gun go to a bettleship meuseum
@@Benjamin-wy4dj waste of money
@@Goodvibes-no9rp An armoured fighting vehicle serves to combat other armoured fighting vehicles or infantry. Not tanks. Armoured division is not about all tanks only. Germans had a mix of tigers and panzers in their armoured warfare. If it is all big guns, a swarm of infantry would overwhelm you. A group of tanks where reload is necessary every time u fire would not be able to sustain such no.s Hence the use of an AFV. A tank will die if it works alone. Many examples u can see in the middle east where ATGM takes them out. Infantry needs to support them. Infantry needs the protection as well hence the AFV n IFV.
Vice versa when AFVs & IFVs encounter tanks, they cannot take them out due to the smaller calibre of their gun hence where the Leo 2 comes in. To destroy another near equivalent force.
However the strategy has change as the huntet itself is equiped with a pair of ATGMs. A new approach for the SAF.
The Hunter will become the hunted.
Will be trialling it out on Hong Kong demonstrators...
No HK will seize it like it did to the terrex lol.
Can it be used on tank to tank battle in real time with this small cannon gun blast??
No, that gun isn't meant to fight against main battle tanks, it's for light armoured vehicles/infantry. But it has guided missiles, so with that it can destroy an MBT.
@@AmineElimrani Look like a mini version of rapid assault rifle retrofited on armoured tank's turret, come in handy on human target.
Its an effective anti-infantry light tank.
Manned and Unmanned version for the army??
What you see here is a remote control 30mm gun. It can change to 105mm module.
The last bastion of the Kou-Min-Tang, Singapura-pura
We do not represent KMT. We are ourselves. And KMT is themselves. What is left of them is in Taiwan. Period
Kow-Tow to British American, Master of Puppets
@@wanasmav We represent no one but ourselves. Just like u a believer in KMT should believe in that and not think of others who believe in your ideals. You are who you are. Whats wrong with that. What is special is in Taiwan not here in Singapore. If not there is no unique or identity. Same for the DPP. Singapore is different from Taiwan same vice versa. You should be proud of that and be yourselve. Not think that others should be you. People came to Singapore during colonial eras. Ideals of KMT did not exists same for ours. We created ours after independence. Yours was once in China. The last bastion is Taiwan. That is truth. To say that my country is the last bastion is an insult to your very selves as there is no influence or whatsoever here. You say that to the leaders in KMT in parliment and you will have another wrestling match because the fact is they are who they are. Why think that we are u? Is it because you are looking for an escape? A safe haven? You are lying to yourselves. Taiwan is different and it should be kept it that way. Regardless of party who runs the country. However, we respect each other mutually and work towards common grounds. We work with like minded nations. Be it in the region or globally. That is diplomacy.
**Hacking commenced**
what happen if neighbour army got jaming system then what happen.
A mass employed jamming system is unthinkable at the moment. Only a superpower is capable of that
Not good enough it needs a bigger cannon to deal more dmg
Its use for against infantry/armour vehicles only.
Wjy are all of them were chanise
Built with the wealth extracted from other countries.
APlaceHolder BPlaceHolder lol ok.. and your point is ? Salty salty
welcome to ladang sawit
Ladang sawit warfare
Looks like Israel's Merkava
Got Appleplay boh
Swift and Decisive.
Smart celebrities
The canon is waay to small
It's meant to fight infantry, not tanks
Ya it's an AFV, not an MBT.
Does have hot water for coffee??
Look like paper tiger to me.
While Malaysian are busy trying to build a flying toy car.
Wait larrr... We will finish that toy project soon.. hahahahahaha
About time.
Welcome to canberra
nah
Not powerful enough. If try at war, the tank would be flatly destroy.
It's not a tank dumbarse. It's an IFV
The center piece of Singapore that gets defeated instantly by an EMP device.
EMP Shielding?
If this is for export from singapore then its good. But if its for singapore i think its not so much use, because if they have to use this to engage the enemy then it means the enemy has already landed on singapore shores with their weapons and infantry and armour,....... And singapore is such a small state with no land mass to have these aifvs maneouver against the enemy. I think singapore would be better served to have a much stronger external defence, on air and naval defence. Geography is just not on singapores side. The japanese knew that in ww2. Dont get me wrong though...... I see it as a good designed aifv.
Heard of Forward defence?
Yup!
Why... even have a military in the first place.
Uhhh defence???
Decorated military, whom you gonna fight? Malaysia?
They do all of this things to get ready for war
Singapore just protect it's land la, wasting cost to fight with no reason...Vietnam actually want to war with Malaysia.
@@zulwabule Singapore protects its sky and sea too
@@extremegamingchannel3398 correct too, but what fallout game said, War never changes
@@zulwabule vietnam geographically far from malaysia, no point of conflict between vietnam and malaysia. Singapore armed to protect itself from threat named malaysia
Just do robocop la..better can live in fantasies..
But is useless if can not use it
Awww...use on who leh..
israel already has namer. russia has kurganets, armata, and koalitsiya. st has a long way to go.
Throw paint on it. You blind. BOOM!
$$$ Wasted
Get close enough to a vehicle with thermal sights and a 30 mm gun to throw paint at it.
Life wasted.
@@jonny2954 If someone like you who have morotic skill and brain, for sure life will be wasted. LOL
@@thelight2893 You didn't understand my comment. A enemy infantryman will definitely waste his life trying to get close enough to this vehicle to throw paint at it. Do you know what a 30 mm HE round does to a human body? He's red mist. Life wasted.
@@jonny2954 Yeah, ever hear of paint ball? Can create similar to that with a long range for counter. Man this tank is trash. Very easy to counter. Bet you didn't though of that, oh wait, Morotic brain.
Yeah, $$$ wasted
@@thelight2893 Stop embarrasing yourself, this isn't a tank, it's an Infantry Fighting Vehicle. It carries its own infantry squad in the back that dismounts for combat operation. Have fun fighting the vehicle and the infantry all at once while getting close enough to fire your fancy paintball gun at the cameras, just to discover that they still have analog periscopes as backup. Stop playing videogames in your mothers basement and join up, maybe you will learn how things work in reality.
Who needs at weapons when you have an EMP XD
looks like a lot of shit that will break and never get repaired
Normally electronics equipment that spoil are replaced. Not fixed.
Besides these are military grade systems.
Outdated st design old senior to keep his job , gov don’t dare to offence him he know too much mindef technology lol This senior don’t accept other new suggestions to implement the technology lol waste taxpayers $$ employ useless ST engineering lol do outdated weapon
Being gay in Singapore
Hindu Gay?