I agree, soooooo horrific, that poor baby, I'd like to just jump through the screen and torture him... Any punishment he gets isn't going to be good enough
lots of time it is males doing the research and investigation. From my experience 85 percent of these investigators are narcissist as well, lazy and just refuse to do their job. Don't know how they keep their jobs.
My family, friends, and I are convinced that Henry Dinkins is "Guilty!" If he is found "Guilty" only the "Death Penalty" should be his sentence NOT "Life Without Parole". In our opinion. Death Penalty!
This monster is a professional criminal that’s why he left his phone home so he wouldn’t be tracked he also didn’t know anyone address who believe his BS
She stutters. That’s why she very methodical with her speech. If you listen to her she’s done it several times. I think she doing great. Also for no fingerprints to be found on anything means that is has been wiped clean. I don’t think this is this guys first time committing this type of crime.
Not a Lawyer but I am getting really tired of this parade of witnesses that come and testify for 30 minutes giving us the condensed version of everything from fingerprints, bleach, DNA, etc..... then after all that, we see the purpose of what they are there for and find out they found no DNA, no bleach, no prints, no blood, that the dead human scent could be 1,000 years old but no evidence found, the flip flops were not hers........I am with the Defence attorney's sarcastic comment that they shipped the Latent print expert all the way from VA to say she didn't find anything. I think having the lead investigator testifying that the items they sent to the lab did not reveal anything and then move-on.......
@@jocbt I totally agree! They could have answered three or four questions…. did you examine the item, did you find evidence (hair, finger prints, etc.), did you process that evidence, and what was your conclusion? That’s it! We don’t need a lesson on how to process hair and fiber evidence. Complete with slides! The prosecutor is one of the better I’ve seen, but man am I ever tired of hearing ummm, uhh, ummm before and after and every sentence in between! If this were a jury trial, I might could understand giving a BRIEF explanation of how evidence is processed and ruled on.
Random but I notice a lot of the women (attorney) and witnesses are pregnant. This must be an incredibly sad case for them knowing a child was murdered.
@@denisegreene2530there is the fact that she was in his care sleep in the bed in the middle of the morning and no break ins. He didn’t call cops. He took battery from phone. Changed clothes. No physical evidence yet. But that Andrea lady said she saw the girl out window in middle of night by his car.
YOU ARE ALLOWED TO LEAD ON CROSS - THAT IS WHY MOST OF THE TIME DEFENSE LAWYERS SAY “is it fair to say…”, “am I correct when saying…”, “do you agree you said prior…”
What a wasted day. Surely there was a shorter, simpler way to show 0 evidence was obtained. It certainly didn't make any points for the prosecution's case.
Are you people LISTENING to the testimony or are you just Watching the trial!!! The testimony wasn't that there was NO evidence...the testimony was that of all those items found there were NO FINGERPRINTS...not just that Henry's prints weren't found, again NO prints which would lead one to conclude that all those items were wiped clean!
Agree and it sucks her body wasn’t found until over a year after her death…. So any evidence of SA (which I firmly believe was his motive) was not recovered. But still, even with that set aside he is the only one that had the opportunity and motive for this crime. Did they ever recover the gun?
@@BB4126I’m not sure they ever recovered the gun; I also believe he unalived Briasia after SA’ing her, but that cannot be proved since she was unfortunately found skeletonized; however this monster had the means, motive & opportunity. I hope the judge finds him guilty.
I think it's possible he could have sold her. He took her somewhere in the middle of the night if he did give her to somebody they had a good head start
He did it, there is no other reason why he would be taking that little girl out at 3am and if he done nothing wrong why does he not tell his girlfriend anything and why the bleach
none of the testimony from Andrea or DL is credible. He said she, Andrea, was with them when she was killed. She originally never said anything about him being with the the girl at 3am yet now she says was sick to her stomach upon seeing it? Why didn't Breasia run away while she was outside the car in the parking lot? Why would he let her get out of the car and stand around while he goes inside to presumably get the weapon(s) to murder her with? It takes a lot longer to walk around the building and into the parking lot than looking out the Bedroom window after he leaves. I find it very weird that she wasn't watching out the BR window when he left......only seeing him driving away. What would you do? I know that as-soon-as that front door closed, I'd walk the 20' into the bedroom and look out the window. Seems a little suspicious to me.
SO SAD HE DID IT AND I SEE SOME PEOPLE IN THE COMMENTS SAYING WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE.......... WELL SHE WAS WITH HIM LAST THE GIRLFRIEND SAW HER OUTSIDE STANDING BY HIS CAR COME ON NOW AND WHY DID HE GIVE HER THAT BIG SHIRT TO SLEEP IN AND ECT
GF was caught in some lies so not sure she is believable and if we believe GF then GF testified that their clothes got wet in the bathroom while the kids took showers and they put both kids in BIG shirts…
She was with him at 3am it seems but after that who knows. I think he did it, but there needs to be more proof to make a solid case. I don't know if the prosecution will come up with a convincing time line in the days to come, but for me, there case is still a little lightweight.
The testimony on the beginning of this trial, The boy, brother of Krishna, seem kind of mixed situations. Then when the wife of the defended was also unclear.. “ yes I was worried because the young girl is missing, and no I didn’t ask Harry where was she..
I’m so disappointed with everyones’ testimony; no diffinitive proof beyond a reasonable doubt; only circumstantial situations have been raised and it’s sad because I do believe he is absolutely guilty. This judge is going to have a super tough decision and that really sucks.
Testimony around the fabric/fibers is a complete waste of time 🤦🏽♀️ prosecutor is trying her best to get the rag found tied directly with the fibers found on the machete however the witness has said several times she cannot definitively say what those fibers are! Time to move on!
Also why wasn’t the hair compared when they found breasia since there was hair that could be used! This case is really dragging with no definite evidence. I feel HD is absolutely guilty and I feel others are involved!
Why not test inside the Impala for her DNA? Baby girl had long dread braids & they shed! Weren't the kids picked up in the Camaro, went to Dinkins friends home & played video games then on to Andrea's apt where they eventually fell asleep? Andrea said she saw baby girl standing outside passenger side of the Impala at 3 something in the morning!!! If baby girl hadn't been in the Impala, her DNA shouldn't be in there either..smh
They did. He cleaned that car so good, his own DNA wasn't in the car. I have a feeling he has done this many times. He is 50 years old. He has got a routine down. His girlfriend said he would be gone at all hours of the night. He left him phone at home, took the battery out, and made sure he was in areas without cameras. It took them 8 months to find the remains of Bre. So imagine how many others he has gotten away with. 😢
@grneys45 he has either done this many times, or he is part of a group. There is no way he could be that smart. I mean, he did finally get caught. Little Breasia is saving other little girls' lives if this animal is convicted.
No evidence seems like it was cleaned up professionally so Noone gets caught. Seems deeper than we know. Let's just say I heard she was sold. Many heard that. Also there's way more people involved. There's a man who owns a nonprofit tht breasia played basketball for. He says on his podcast that he was walking the area with investigators when they did their investigation. He said she was buried and he took the mom there. He said he was took into a room with the mom with investigators when breasia was found. He deleted his podcast and also he has a status he mentioned it. Why isn't he on the stand????
@w.thomas306 there are recordings of it and he wrote it in a status u want a copy ?! Lol I don't say anything I can't prove. Many people have it and have read it with their own eyes 👁 alot of us aren't sleep to what's going on 💯‼️
@@w.thomas306 boy you show up in soooooo many comments being the self righteous know it all.. don’t you have a life 🤷🏻♀️ your concern is garbage. Try being relevant or helpful for a change 🤗
Yeah her Um Ah's are driving me ABSOLUTELY FREAKING CRAZY and it seems like she's bringing people on the stand who don't count for anything, the one person on the stand today was only on there to testify that they couldn't find any blatant fingerprints or whatever the heck it was called... Uuug... This lady is a freaking joke
@@samb7370 she doesn't have a speech impediment the whole way she's presenting the case is confusing and long-winded it's impossible to follow what she saying
It’s possible Breasia was tricked somehow and when Andrea saw her outside the window she assumed she was with Dinkins . I don’t think he’s the perpetrator.
![[Live] : ONE 169 วันนี้!! "อนาโตลี vs อูมาร์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IK3YZVWuFJg/mqdefault.jpg)
It blows my mind this baby wasn’t found until a year later! When the cops had his whereabouts and knew he was at that location it’s truly shocking
I agree, soooooo horrific, that poor baby, I'd like to just jump through the screen and torture him... Any punishment he gets isn't going to be good enough
IA not a death penalty state.
Nothing surprises me with PD anymore
lots of time it is males doing the research and investigation. From my experience 85 percent of these investigators are narcissist as well, lazy and just refuse to do their job. Don't know how they keep their jobs.
Exactly. I honestly feel like they weren't looking for her. They would have never found her if it wasn't for the fishermen
My family, friends, and I are convinced that Henry Dinkins is "Guilty!" If he is found "Guilty" only the "Death Penalty" should be his sentence NOT "Life Without Parole". In our opinion. Death Penalty!
Iowa is not a death penalty state.
Iowa abolished the death penalty in 1965,
@@John-kv7jothat’s a shame
This monster is a professional criminal that’s why he left his phone home so he wouldn’t be tracked he also didn’t know anyone address who believe his BS
Just like Bryan kohberger
Exactly… who knows how many more children/ people he’s murdered 😢
henry's dna not found anywhere makes him look even more guilty
Exactly. I’m following only on day 6 trial! Only thing I’m trying to figure out is how jury made there decision, I didn’t get that far yet.
@@markeetanorman859 This is a bench trial....no jury just the judge. I wonder why the defense decided on a bench trial?
The car was cleaned so well that his own DNA was not found in his own car. Wow! B DNA was not found in a car she was in and it should be found.
She stutters. That’s why she very methodical with her speech. If you listen to her she’s done it several times. I think she doing great. Also for no fingerprints to be found on anything means that is has been wiped clean. I don’t think this is this guys first time committing this type of crime.
You especially hear it when she say the word to....
The prosecutor is the most efficient woman on the planet! ❤ I'm voting for her in anything else she does in her life ! 😊
Not a Lawyer but I am getting really tired of this parade of witnesses that come and testify for 30 minutes giving us the condensed version of everything from fingerprints, bleach, DNA, etc..... then after all that, we see the purpose of what they are there for and find out they found no DNA, no bleach, no prints, no blood, that the dead human scent could be 1,000 years old but no evidence found, the flip flops were not hers........I am with the Defence attorney's sarcastic comment that they shipped the Latent print expert all the way from VA to say she didn't find anything. I think having the lead investigator testifying that the items they sent to the lab did not reveal anything and then move-on.......
@@jocbt I totally agree! They could have answered three or four questions…. did you examine the item, did you find evidence (hair, finger prints, etc.), did you process that evidence, and what was your conclusion? That’s it! We don’t need a lesson on how to process hair and fiber evidence. Complete with slides! The prosecutor is one of the better I’ve seen, but man am I ever tired of hearing ummm, uhh, ummm before and after and every sentence in between! If this were a jury trial, I might could understand giving a BRIEF explanation of how evidence is processed and ruled on.
Random but I notice a lot of the women (attorney) and witnesses are pregnant. This must be an incredibly sad case for them knowing a child was murdered.
Do not listen to this line of questioning while operating heavy machinery.
This is going like The Mickey Mouse Clubhouse ', i feel like he's gonna get off.
Is there a jury or just the judge will decide? I don’t see him walking if the judge decides. Let’s pray!
No jury in this trial. It’s all up to the judge.
The challenge is there is no physical evidence yet... so the judge might not have a choice
Judge only
@@denisegreene2530there is the fact that she was in his care sleep in the bed in the middle of the morning and no break ins. He didn’t call cops. He took battery from phone. Changed clothes. No physical evidence yet. But that Andrea lady said she saw the girl out window in middle of night by his car.
@@denisegreene2530true
Starts at 39:04
Why is the prosecution allowing the defence to give the young man’s testimony.. He’s allowed to dictate the story to a 10 year old impressionable kid?
YOU ARE ALLOWED TO LEAD ON CROSS - THAT IS WHY MOST OF THE TIME DEFENSE LAWYERS SAY “is it fair to say…”, “am I correct when saying…”, “do you agree you said prior…”
What a wasted day. Surely there was a shorter, simpler way to show 0 evidence was obtained. It certainly didn't make any points for the prosecution's case.
Agreed
I can't even believe the prosecutors would bother calling them as witnesses to nothing
Are you people LISTENING to the testimony or are you just Watching the trial!!! The testimony wasn't that there was NO evidence...the testimony was that of all those items found there were NO FINGERPRINTS...not just that Henry's prints weren't found, again NO prints which would lead one to conclude that all those items were wiped clean!
IN MY OPINION THE PROSECUTOR DID AN EXCELLENT JOB YESTERDAY... LET'S SEE HOW SHE DID TODAY!!!
I hate that there’s no beyond the reasonable doubt evidence! Unless I missed it.
I said the same thing. It appears all circumstantial
Agree and it sucks her body wasn’t found until over a year after her death…. So any evidence of SA (which I firmly believe was his motive) was not recovered. But still, even with that set aside he is the only one that had the opportunity and motive for this crime. Did they ever recover the gun?
@@BB4126I’m not sure they ever recovered the gun; I also believe he unalived Briasia after SA’ing her, but that cannot be proved since she was unfortunately found skeletonized; however this monster had the means, motive & opportunity. I hope the judge finds him guilty.
@@Discovering_Diana 💯💯💯Spot on and I agree with everything you said. Justice for sweet Breasia.
I think it's possible he could have sold her. He took her somewhere in the middle of the night if he did give her to somebody they had a good head start
He did it, there is no other reason why he would be taking that little girl out at 3am and if he done nothing wrong why does he not tell his girlfriend anything and why the bleach
none of the testimony from Andrea or DL is credible. He said she, Andrea, was with them when she was killed. She originally never said anything about him being with the the girl at 3am yet now she says was sick to her stomach upon seeing it? Why didn't Breasia run away while she was outside the car in the parking lot? Why would he let her get out of the car and stand around while he goes inside to presumably get the weapon(s) to murder her with? It takes a lot longer to walk around the building and into the parking lot than looking out the Bedroom window after he leaves. I find it very weird that she wasn't watching out the BR window when he left......only seeing him driving away. What would you do? I know that as-soon-as that front door closed, I'd walk the 20' into the bedroom and look out the window. Seems a little suspicious to me.
ALRIGHT!! Prosecutor come thru 👏🏽👏🏽
SO SAD HE DID IT AND I SEE SOME PEOPLE IN THE COMMENTS SAYING WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE.......... WELL SHE WAS WITH HIM LAST THE GIRLFRIEND SAW HER OUTSIDE STANDING BY HIS CAR COME ON NOW AND WHY DID HE GIVE HER THAT BIG SHIRT TO SLEEP IN AND ECT
Because of prosecutor witnesses are not helping the case
GF was caught in some lies so not sure she is believable and if we believe GF then GF testified that their clothes got wet in the bathroom while the kids took showers and they put both kids in BIG shirts…
She was with him at 3am it seems but after that who knows. I think he did it, but there needs to be more proof to make a solid case. I don't know if the prosecution will come up with a convincing time line in the days to come, but for me, there case is still a little lightweight.
What tells you he did it? I don’t think he is the initial started to the Situation. Did he cover it up? Yes! Is he covering for someone else? Yes!
@@w.thomas306 Likely covering for you
What about his homeboy? Did he take her there??
Is the defendant’s older lawyer the same one from the Mollie Tibetts murder trial?
Yes.
The testimony on the beginning of this trial, The boy, brother of Krishna, seem kind of mixed situations. Then when the wife of the defended was also unclear.. “ yes I was worried because the young girl is missing, and no I didn’t ask Harry where was she..
👀👀
the brunette prosecutor holds a pen like a 3 yr old
How did all her teachers through early school years not have her hold it right.
This man is a monster
Redhead was useless!
Agree very useless
The lack of confidence in the tone of her voice makes her testimony come across as less credible
@@ZZZ54321 exactly
I’m so disappointed with everyones’ testimony; no diffinitive proof beyond a reasonable doubt; only circumstantial situations have been raised and it’s sad because I do believe he is absolutely guilty. This judge is going to have a super tough decision and that really sucks.
@@Discovering_Diana I agree
how is it all of a sudden a sheath from ANOTHER machete?
Testimony around the fabric/fibers is a complete waste of time 🤦🏽♀️ prosecutor is trying her best to get the rag found tied directly with the fibers found on the machete however the witness has said several times she cannot definitively say what those fibers are! Time to move on!
Also why wasn’t the hair compared when they found breasia since there was hair that could be used! This case is really dragging with no definite evidence. I feel HD is absolutely guilty and I feel others are involved!
Why not test inside the Impala for her DNA? Baby girl had long dread braids & they shed! Weren't the kids picked up in the Camaro, went to Dinkins friends home & played video games then on to Andrea's apt where they eventually fell asleep? Andrea said she saw baby girl standing outside passenger side of the Impala at 3 something in the morning!!! If baby girl hadn't been in the Impala, her DNA shouldn't be in there either..smh
They did. He cleaned that car so good, his own DNA wasn't in the car. I have a feeling he has done this many times. He is 50 years old. He has got a routine down. His girlfriend said he would be gone at all hours of the night. He left him phone at home, took the battery out, and made sure he was in areas without cameras. It took them 8 months to find the remains of Bre. So imagine how many others he has gotten away with. 😢
@@BubblyDishWaterexactly and he's a tier 3 s.o. yes I bet he's done this before
@grneys45 he has either done this many times, or he is part of a group. There is no way he could be that smart. I mean, he did finally get caught. Little Breasia is saving other little girls' lives if this animal is convicted.
All those clothes womens and kids not accounted for must have stories
how many thousands of taxpayer dollars were spent on testing?
No evidence seems like it was cleaned up professionally so Noone gets caught. Seems deeper than we know. Let's just say I heard she was sold. Many heard that. Also there's way more people involved. There's a man who owns a nonprofit tht breasia played basketball for. He says on his podcast that he was walking the area with investigators when they did their investigation. He said she was buried and he took the mom there. He said he was took into a room with the mom with investigators when breasia was found. He deleted his podcast and also he has a status he mentioned it. Why isn't he on the stand????
Don’t start with a narrative & you can’t prove then say oh the podcast is no longer available. Gone!
@w.thomas306 there are recordings of it and he wrote it in a status u want a copy ?! Lol I don't say anything I can't prove. Many people have it and have read it with their own eyes 👁 alot of us aren't sleep to what's going on 💯‼️
@@w.thomas306 boy you show up in soooooo many comments being the self righteous know it all.. don’t you have a life 🤷🏻♀️ your concern is garbage. Try being relevant or helpful for a change 🤗
Have they gone home??
the DNA wasn’t helping the prosecution at all… which is fair, the made the prosecutor work
free trace evidence seminar included in this video
FBI Otterstatter is working far above her skillset.
This dinkins guy is evil and he did it
The prosecutor is awful. I cannot even follow this trial with her weird questioning patterns and behavior. Its a setup hea going to get off
I agree, I can't stand listening to her. She bounces around and constantly says "um uh"
Yeah her Um Ah's are driving me ABSOLUTELY FREAKING CRAZY and it seems like she's bringing people on the stand who don't count for anything, the one person on the stand today was only on there to testify that they couldn't find any blatant fingerprints or whatever the heck it was called... Uuug... This lady is a freaking joke
I read in a live chat the attorney has a speech impediment. Does she sound strange yes. does it make her incompetent? No. Lay off unless u know facts.
@@samb7370 she doesn't have a speech impediment the whole way she's presenting the case is confusing and long-winded it's impossible to follow what she saying
I still don't even have a grasp with a timeline and I've actually been listening to the trial not just reading some of the comments and making
More people were involved
Tooo many I “ do not recal..🧐
The latent print fbi bada&&. So so dayum good. Saving for sure!
😂 were or thay???
It’s possible Breasia was tricked somehow and when Andrea saw her outside the window she assumed she was with Dinkins . I don’t think he’s the perpetrator.
I think Andrea saw her Ghost not her Living physical self.
@@w.thomas306 stop trolling me
Ridiculous
you have not been watching this trial if u think that thing is innocent
@@belfiore_18What do you mean? That’s my true opinion. Get over yourself.