Dude 226 dislikes this guy is like the best commentator ever he literally went threw every single move/possibilities and explained everything threw out the game. I don't understand how people can dislike this. Overall very well explained, subbed, like, etc.
+shadower darkisb He's a pretentious little twat. This video is nothing but 'he could have done this or that or maybe the other thing! why didn't he do what I wanted him to do?!1 D:' The game was played the way it was played. All these maybes are even less than worthless verbal diarrhea.
+Marco Bering That's what all commentary IS (what if this why not this etc.). However, he never once said either of the chess players were bad; contrarily he complimented their tactics extensively. This commentary is very helpful as a learning tool
+shadower darkisb I disagree. The comments sound more like an average joe questioning a Grandmaster´s choices while not seeing the (GOOD) reasons why they decided to play their moves THE WAY THEY DID. Criticism is acceptable, but if faulty it ceases to be acknowledgeable. And because most people don´t know much about chess and lack the necessary depth they might fall for it and give plenty of thumbs up...
Great commentary...for some reason, you have a way of doing so without distracting too much from the game itself, which, for a novice like me, is immensely beneficial...thank you!
I like sacrificing for positional advantages, but this is sacrificing a rook just for one move of tempo! Love it. A very nice analysis of an amazing game.
Amazing. Kasparov and Topalov, and probably all people at the global top level, think so far ahead. I loved the double rook sacrifice plan by Kasparov, showing the dept he can actually plan solid moves into. I also liked the forced move at 21:15, and the pure fact that Topalov understands the force, and moves.
wow ! a lesson for all the beginners ( like myself ) i mean before kasparov plays the rook sac, and as the commentator so rightly pointed out, it doesnt seem his pieces threatening a lot, i mean the analysis was just superb about the knight and the bishop both not as active as black's pieces, and with that space gain it does really seem like white is gonna be in a bit of trouble after some pieces are traded off maybe or when we hit the end game, but here kasparov shows how to use the 'potential' of the pieces, i mean he made the right moves in the opening, start-middle-game while developing and the pieces have potential but something needs to be done and kasparov here brilliantly shows how to analyse a postion wherein you played the better developing moves in the beginning but you seem like been shut out now in the middle game, his spot on calculations help to completely bring out the potential of his pieces, i would certainly start thinking like this to see if a coordinated attack is possible thereby respecting the moves you have already made !!!! wow wow wow !!!!! amazing analysis of a brilliant game !!!!!!
Jimmy Page Thank you for your great comment. I guess you said all lol. Anyway glad to see you enjoy the course and keep positing comments like this, it's always a pleasure to read it 😊 Thank you !
Thanks so much for a great presentation of an awesome game! What a pleasure! I thoroughly enjoyed the entire video from beginning to end, plus a lot of rewinds as well! LOL!! You're narration was clear, poignant, & engrossing! Thanks again!
It's actually amazing how much chess engines have improved in a relatively short period of time. I remember watching a TH-cam video about 10 years ago about this game, and the commentator said that it took one of the top chess engines of the time something like an hour to find 24. Rxd4. I just tested out of curiosity with Stockfish6, and it found that move as the best one in less than a second. (Even after 5 billion nodes calculated, depth 40, it still considers it the best move for white. Curiously, it considers white's position worse than black's, at -0.42. Not by much, of course, but still apparently not a clear-cut win for white. It considers black's best refutation to be 24. ... Kb6.)
In one of my older chess books 24. ... Kb6 was also listed as the best move for black, maintaining a little bit of an advantage, even. Seems like Stockfish6 thinks the same. Kasparov was just a titanic force here with this combination. There was no way Topalov could see all of that. There didn't _seem_ to be a forced win for Kasparov, so Topalov took the risk and lost the game after Kasparov's utterly insane attack.
I remember the first time I played through this game. Remarkable that Kasparov had the chance to produce a golden game before retiring. Topalov deserves credit for the assist.
The very best orchestration between narrative and highlightings! That's putting it briefly! It was a supreme pleasure following your analysis! I felt I was actually in the game with this video! Second of yours I've seen. [ Kpovs4queens?] You were humorous in that one too! I may have commented so. May I call you maestro?
OnlineChessLessons.NET, Will? Is it?... 12 plus 1's, about now! As I recall, your analysis, struck me as being very enjoyable!... It's nice to see, others felt the same way, as I did! Will...what? It's not Will Shortz.... He does puzzles! Lol!
This was an awesome video, man. To think that a person could sack a rook and a knight and still go on to win the match is absurd and insane! However, a man by the name of Garry Kasparov was able to pull it off. And really it was just hilarious the whole game how Topalov wasn't even able to involve his king side rook into the game because of Kasparov's constant and persistent mating threats and checks; it seemed almost as if on every move, that if Topalov did not make the right move then he would be mated. If he used up time to develop his other rook he would have lost on the spot.
very instructive...I think in the prime of their careers Kasparov is the greatest of every world champion...the absolute best player the world has every seen touch the pieces...his games are also among the most instructive and entertaining as well.
Absolutely phenomenal game and fantastic commentary. I consider myself a beginner at chess, but it's still easy to notice when others don't know what they're doing (especially in analysis videos). Not your case. Every single possibility observed makes sense and is instructive. You've got a new subscriber! And once again...what a game!
I love Garry!! He plays Chess like the opponent doesn’t exist. His game is more like watching an amazing mathematical art with a story. A genius, and to risk his life for Russian people shows the man he really is, and the depth of his heart!! It is truly an honor to have him live in my lifetimre.
Lol risk his life?! The armenian jew Gary Weinstein never risk his life, trust me..Well funded by the West he tried to sell Russia but it didn't work. As a check player -one of the greatest In the history if not The Greatest. As a person - complete shit.
stop showing what they would have played, and simply show how the game was actually played. It's not as if you could possibly know the thoughts in their heads in order to discuss the "if" possibilities
TheMrLandon Analysis is important but I think that it should be saved for after the game. Otherwise people watching the video just won't know what happened, what moves were played when. At the end of the day these guys are world champions and probably had some thoughts similar to those of this narrator as to what moves to play next. Just show us what could have happened after the game is finished that is all I want.
I have to agree with some of the people posting here, that your commenting is really clear and enriching, not even distracting. The only thing I recommend is being more clear on to which moves are actually "recommendations", and which ones are the real ones from the game; I kind of got lost more than once thinking the game developed in a way which did not! Thanks again :)
Great commentary, just one small criticism. It would help novice players, like myself, to follow more closely, if you had some way of highlighting moves that didn't actually happen in the game itself, (like the g4 'move' at about 01:42). It got a bit confusing at times.
I am new to chess and even I (as a newbie) can see that this is one hell of a crazy game. Especially nice you kinda summed up the game at the end, loved it!
Topalov knew he would lose if he took the Rook but players at that level wanna test those things. I bet he wanted to see what the best chessplayer in the world had come up with.
Actually I think he said he simply missed Kasparov's c3!. He saw 9 moves ahead and didn't see how Kasparov would finish the attack, but Kasparov saw 16 moves ahead.
I've watched a few commentaries on this classic game, but yours might just be my favorite thus far! Such an amazing and deep game with absolutely stunning sacrifices by Kasparov. You went through some very interesting variations besides the obvious sacrifices, which some videos don't even manage to cover for us who can't think too many moves ahead.
I really like the graphics showing the path of the pieces- makes it very easy to follow and understand. This has to be one of the craziest games of all time.
Although I sometimes enjoy watching very "cirurgically precise" maneuvering of pieces, there is no doubt that the smell of blood from pieces sacrifices makes the game so much entertaining to see and admire. Please keep up your great selection of games. Thank you!
I don't even play chess and am a complete novice (I just enjoy watching games for some reason) but a lot of the moves go over my head as to why. This was so thoroughly explained in such a good way that even being a complete beginner, I understood the whole thing perfectly due to your explanation. A+ for this video and it was great entertainment even though I don't get to put it to practical use.
thank you for commenting and explaining this game. As a new player I wouldn't be able to understand and see all the technical things involved in this game. Thank you very much
I stumbled on this game while surfing the web last night and I was hooked on it all day today. You did a great job of going through the possible combinations, but one thing you didn't go thoroughly enough is what happens after black plays Ra8 at 20:48. White's best move here is actually Kb2! and White either mates or wins the Queen. Let's go through Black's options after Kb2: … a5, Qb6! a5xb4, Ra7+! RxR, QxR mate … a5, Qb6! Qd5, Bf1! Qe5+, c3 (any move), Bxb5+ QxB, QxQ mate
that game was bananas!!! A good old fashioned King Chase. I love how once Kasparov starts sac'ing pieces he just keeps going. Comepletely nuts! The double rook sac idea was brilliant. Even though the 2nd rook couldn't be taken.
Excellent analysis of one of my favorite games. Thanks! This game really deserves to be called "The best game ever". Will, have you ever seen a more complicated chess game than Kasparov's Immortal?
This is a great video. Kasparov is a genius when it comes to prophylactic thinking. I will certainly reconsider many of the up front and simple defensive moves I use when I play and instead look for longer term success moves.
very nice annotation to an amazing game, as you say. I appreciated your skill in describing the variations which seem impossibly fortunate and dangerous.
What I found most interesting was the strange dynamic of black holding on to a material advantage while hoping white falls short on his push for mate. And while it seemed white was temporarily thwarted, he captures back more material so that black can no longer rely on his material lead. Then ultimately black is undone both ways, by lack of material AND the relentless mate threats and forced moves.
Question: Why would Kb8 for black make White wonder if the d7 knight is going to possibly go to e5? Why wouldn't White consider that without the prophylactic Kb8. And how is Kb8 prophylactic? It seems like the white queen can swing to f4 and pin the d6 pawn. This happens at 8:19 in the video. Thanks.
the hardest thing about watching this video is the off script annotations. This is a Kasparov masterpiece. It's got flavors of Steinitz, Capablanca and Tal. Just show us their moves and narrate from there.
this is true but by playing h6 black is losing time, and will probly need to lose more time to protect it with Kh7 after white doubles up on that pawn. the flip side is that you do allow the bishop exchange a lot of the time (but white also loses time to pursue the exchange!) Hope that helps, Will
I also sacrifice everything... including my king
+M. Yasir Ali who needs the king anyways
I am also very good at sacrificing everything, the problem is, that is also the only thing I'm good at it
murderousintent I find myself doing that as well, tactical sacrifices followed by a tactical surrender.
+TimeMachine140 Same
+Deathmeter hahahaha tactical surrender xD
I love sacrifices. They are fun, at least until my King has been rounded up.
I usually just sacrifice my opponent. It looks easier.
Dude 226 dislikes this guy is like the best commentator ever he literally went threw every single move/possibilities and explained everything threw out the game. I don't understand how people can dislike this. Overall very well explained, subbed, like, etc.
+shadower darkisb Thanks, but 226 dislikes... and 3373 likes!
+shadower darkisb He's a pretentious little twat. This video is nothing but 'he could have done this or that or maybe the other thing! why didn't he do what I wanted him to do?!1 D:'
The game was played the way it was played. All these maybes are even less than worthless verbal diarrhea.
+Marco Bering That's what all commentary IS (what if this why not this etc.). However, he never once said either of the chess players were bad; contrarily he complimented their tactics extensively. This commentary is very helpful as a learning tool
+Marco Bering It's called analysis and constructive criticism. You're just being absurdly butthurt.
+shadower darkisb I disagree. The comments sound more like an average joe questioning a Grandmaster´s choices while not seeing the (GOOD) reasons why they decided to play their moves THE WAY THEY DID.
Criticism is acceptable, but if faulty it ceases to be acknowledgeable. And because most people don´t know much about chess and lack the necessary depth they might fall for it and give plenty of thumbs up...
Great commentary...for some reason, you have a way of doing so without distracting too much from the game itself, which, for a novice like me, is immensely beneficial...thank you!
Best commentary, great to find someone impartial.
I like sacrificing for positional advantages, but this is sacrificing a rook just for one move of tempo! Love it. A very nice analysis of an amazing game.
Great teaching! In the game, (of course) and the very superior analysis. Thank you!
that was insanely awesome, i like how you discuss the possible future moves and what each move played means for the other side
Amazing. Kasparov and Topalov, and probably all people at the global top level, think so far ahead. I loved the double rook sacrifice plan by Kasparov, showing the dept he can actually plan solid moves into. I also liked the forced move at 21:15, and the pure fact that Topalov understands the force, and moves.
wow ! a lesson for all the beginners ( like myself ) i mean before kasparov plays the rook sac, and as the commentator so rightly pointed out, it doesnt seem his pieces threatening a lot, i mean the analysis was just superb about the knight and the bishop both not as active as black's pieces, and with that space gain it does really seem like white is gonna be in a bit of trouble after some pieces are traded off maybe or when we hit the end game, but here kasparov shows how to use the 'potential' of the pieces, i mean he made the right moves in the opening, start-middle-game while developing and the pieces have potential but something needs to be done and kasparov here brilliantly shows how to analyse a postion wherein you played the better developing moves in the beginning but you seem like been shut out now in the middle game, his spot on calculations help to completely bring out the potential of his pieces, i would certainly start thinking like this to see if a coordinated attack is possible thereby respecting the moves you have already made !!!! wow wow wow !!!!! amazing analysis of a brilliant game !!!!!!
Jimmy Page Thank you for your great comment. I guess you said all lol. Anyway glad to see you enjoy the course and keep positing comments like this, it's always a pleasure to read it 😊 Thank you !
Plus, he started with the Bishop sacrifice to remove Black's Bishop...
This game is so deep!
Thanks so much for a great presentation of an awesome game!
What a pleasure! I thoroughly enjoyed the entire video from beginning to end, plus a lot of rewinds as well! LOL!!
You're narration was clear, poignant, & engrossing! Thanks again!
It's actually amazing how much chess engines have improved in a relatively short period of time.
I remember watching a TH-cam video about 10 years ago about this game, and the commentator said that it took one of the top chess engines of the time something like an hour to find 24. Rxd4. I just tested out of curiosity with Stockfish6, and it found that move as the best one in less than a second.
(Even after 5 billion nodes calculated, depth 40, it still considers it the best move for white. Curiously, it considers white's position worse than black's, at -0.42. Not by much, of course, but still apparently not a clear-cut win for white. It considers black's best refutation to be 24. ... Kb6.)
In one of my older chess books 24. ... Kb6 was also listed as the best move for black, maintaining a little bit of an advantage, even. Seems like Stockfish6 thinks the same.
Kasparov was just a titanic force here with this combination. There was no way Topalov could see all of that. There didn't _seem_ to be a forced win for Kasparov, so Topalov took the risk and lost the game after Kasparov's utterly insane attack.
I tried to use Kasparov's sacrifice tactic but I ended up sacrificing my king :/
LOL
Dude, same here, If I was kasparov I would be like " easy" but im me so im like "what the ****, I cant do anything!"
Laughed a lot bro.... Nice one
I remember the first time I played through this game. Remarkable that Kasparov had the chance to produce a golden game before retiring. Topalov deserves credit for the assist.
Best commentary for a single game ever, kudos and thanks.
the best game i ever seen. thanks a lot
+ismail hossain Thanks!
Thanks for your efforts. I enjoyed it so much.
+burhan bozkurt Thanks!
+burhan bozkurt Kesinlikle efsane...
i learned a lot!!
After having a break in chess for years, these kind of reviews rly get me motivated to play (more) again. Love the detailed insight!
excellent analyse! these sacrifices are so cool to watch and try understand
The very best orchestration between narrative and highlightings! That's putting it briefly! It was a supreme pleasure following your analysis! I felt I was actually in the game with this video! Second of yours I've seen. [ Kpovs4queens?] You were humorous in that one too! I may have commented so. May I call you maestro?
Steve Sebzda thanks!
OnlineChessLessons.NET, Will? Is it?... 12 plus 1's, about now! As I recall, your analysis, struck me as being very enjoyable!... It's nice to see, others felt the same way, as I did!
Will...what? It's not Will Shortz.... He does puzzles! Lol!
This was an awesome video, man. To think that a person could sack a rook and a knight and still go on to win the match is absurd and insane! However, a man by the name of Garry Kasparov was able to pull it off. And really it was just hilarious the whole game how Topalov wasn't even able to involve his king side rook into the game because of Kasparov's constant and persistent mating threats and checks; it seemed almost as if on every move, that if Topalov did not make the right move then he would be mated. If he used up time to develop his other rook he would have lost on the spot.
very instructive...I think in the prime of their careers Kasparov is the greatest of every world champion...the absolute best player the world has every seen touch the pieces...his games are also among the most instructive and entertaining as well.
+Kelly Driskill Indeed, He is one of the best chess players in history.
Absolutely phenomenal game and fantastic commentary. I consider myself a beginner at chess, but it's still easy to notice when others don't know what they're doing (especially in analysis videos). Not your case. Every single possibility observed makes sense and is instructive. You've got a new subscriber!
And once again...what a game!
Maybe it's worth a note that the black king ends where the white started. :)
Thanks for the analysis! It's awesome.
+tomekd789 Thanks, I'm glad you like this video!
I love Garry!! He plays Chess like the opponent doesn’t exist. His game is more like watching an amazing mathematical art with a story. A genius, and to risk his life for Russian people shows the man he really is, and the depth of his heart!! It is truly an honor to have him live in my lifetimre.
thanks for commenting!
risk his life?
Lol risk his life?! The armenian jew Gary Weinstein never risk his life, trust me..Well funded by the West he tried to sell Russia but it didn't work. As a check player -one of the greatest In the history if not The Greatest. As a person - complete shit.
Thanks for the feedback Alejandro - certainly appreciated.
This is by far my favorite video. Thanks Will!
Best half an hour ever spent :D
stop showing what they would have played, and simply show how the game was actually played. It's not as if you could possibly know the thoughts in their heads in order to discuss the "if" possibilities
what a moronic comment..
TheMrLandon Analysis is important but I think that it should be saved for after the game. Otherwise people watching the video just won't know what happened, what moves were played when. At the end of the day these guys are world champions and probably had some thoughts similar to those of this narrator as to what moves to play next. Just show us what could have happened after the game is finished that is all I want.
Very thorough, great commentary covering all aspects of this wonderful game.
I have to agree with some of the people posting here, that your commenting is really clear and enriching, not even distracting. The only thing I recommend is being more clear on to which moves are actually "recommendations", and which ones are the real ones from the game; I kind of got lost more than once thinking the game developed in a way which did not! Thanks again :)
Great commentary, just one small criticism. It would help novice players, like myself, to follow more closely, if you had some way of highlighting moves that didn't actually happen in the game itself, (like the g4 'move' at about 01:42). It got a bit confusing at times.
its amazing that up so much material he not only has to give it all back but even allows kasparov to get ahead in material just to keep his king alive
I am new to chess and even I (as a newbie) can see that this is one hell of a crazy game.
Especially nice you kinda summed up the game at the end, loved it!
Topalov knew he would lose if he took the Rook but players at that level wanna test those things.
I bet he wanted to see what the best chessplayer in the world had come up with.
Actually its pretty much forced. Analysed it with coach and friends today... lmao
Actually I think he said he simply missed Kasparov's c3!. He saw 9 moves ahead and didn't see how Kasparov would finish the attack, but Kasparov saw 16 moves ahead.
Thanks for your feedback!
You're great man! Awesome vid, hope for more.
That was a brilliant game, and really good analysis. Thank you.
I've watched a few commentaries on this classic game, but yours might just be my favorite thus far! Such an amazing and deep game with absolutely stunning sacrifices by Kasparov. You went through some very interesting variations besides the obvious sacrifices, which some videos don't even manage to cover for us who can't think too many moves ahead.
I really like the graphics showing the path of the pieces- makes it very easy to follow and understand. This has to be one of the craziest games of all time.
Thank you!
Although I sometimes enjoy watching very "cirurgically precise" maneuvering of pieces, there is no doubt that the smell of blood from pieces sacrifices makes the game so much entertaining to see and admire.
Please keep up your great selection of games. Thank you!
Awesome game !! One of the best games I have seen !!
Excellent explanation and commentary too .. Great work !!
thanks!
One of the best chess games according to me.. Loved ur commentary by the way! ❤
Thanks!
Great video as always Will....You guys are great please keep up the good work and god bless you all. :)
I don't even play chess and am a complete novice (I just enjoy watching games for some reason) but a lot of the moves go over my head as to why. This was so thoroughly explained in such a good way that even being a complete beginner, I understood the whole thing perfectly due to your explanation. A+ for this video and it was great entertainment even though I don't get to put it to practical use.
Love the commentary and analysis. You do great videos on famous games.
thank you for commenting and explaining this game. As a new player I wouldn't be able to understand and see all the technical things involved in this game. Thank you very much
I stumbled on this game while surfing the web last night and I was hooked on it all day today. You did a great job of going through the possible combinations, but one thing you didn't go thoroughly enough is what happens after black plays Ra8 at 20:48. White's best move here is actually Kb2! and White either mates or wins the Queen. Let's go through Black's options after Kb2:
… a5, Qb6! a5xb4, Ra7+! RxR, QxR mate
… a5, Qb6! Qd5, Bf1! Qe5+, c3 (any move), Bxb5+ QxB, QxQ mate
that game was bananas!!! A good old fashioned King Chase. I love how once Kasparov starts sac'ing pieces he just keeps going.
Comepletely nuts! The double rook sac idea was brilliant. Even though the 2nd rook couldn't be taken.
Excellent analysis of one of my favorite games. Thanks! This game really deserves to be called "The best game ever". Will, have you ever seen a more complicated chess game than Kasparov's Immortal?
Great commentary and analysis. very well done thank you.
Peter Dwyer thanks!
Very clear commentary on an amazing game. Thank you
The thumbnail on this video is everything.
Yeah this is excellent commentary, thank you
"Just to review: this game was completely nuts" :)
Thanks for the video! Very entertaining and instructive commentary.
Thanks for commenting!
omfg this game is amazing
what specific time are you referring to?
Great one. Loved it! Thanks for uploading, and great review! :3
Kasparov also sacrifices the King.
HAHAHHAHA
Alaa Maoula ......😆😆😆😆😆😆😂😂😂😂😂😃😃😃😃😄😄😄
LichHADO MC And still wins
This is a great video. Kasparov is a genius when it comes to prophylactic thinking. I will certainly reconsider many of the up front and simple defensive moves I use when I play and instead look for longer term success moves.
I think it was very clear when it was from the actual game and when it was your ideas.
thank you very much for this video.
Brilliant game by Kasparov! His immortal chess game! "Chess is life" - Fisher
That is just so deep and well thought out. There is no guessing why he was the best.
Looks like Jin for Mac or Blitzin for windows, GM Lemos
I imagine you learn A LOT by analyzing these games. I know I do. thanks for the efforts and the teaching.
One of the greatest games ever played. Thanks for your insight!
Hi! please tell me the exact minute ( like 10.05) so i can help you in a better way. take care. GM Lemos
Right, specially the d4-e4-f3 setup against the Pirc defense, very useful if you want to attack later!
i just found this stuff - only know the game very casually - completely awesome thank you - math guy about to lose my mind on your channel
Oh boy!!! No one would have seen that rook sac coming...
Dude, great explanation throughout.
+Buzz Bloomfield thanks!
very nice annotation to an amazing game, as you say. I appreciated your skill in describing the variations which seem impossibly fortunate and dangerous.
Thanks for the game, and I appreciate your dialogue as well....quite instructive.
+Mike Rimm thanks, I'm glad you like this video.
How do you make those boxes and arrows in the program?
With the program used to show the moves
+iChess.net What's it called?
Chessbase
Thanks.
What I found most interesting was the strange dynamic of black holding on to a material advantage while hoping white falls short on his push for mate. And while it seemed white was temporarily thwarted, he captures back more material so that black can no longer rely on his material lead. Then ultimately black is undone both ways, by lack of material AND the relentless mate threats and forced moves.
Kasparov is the chess hero!!Thanks for the amazing video commentary on this immortal game!!!
Thanks for watching!
Thumbs up !!!!
Plz upload more dynamic games like these.
Thnx.
Question: Why would Kb8 for black make White wonder if the d7 knight is going to possibly go to e5? Why wouldn't White consider that without the prophylactic Kb8. And how is Kb8 prophylactic? It seems like the white queen can swing to f4 and pin the d6 pawn. This happens at 8:19 in the video. Thanks.
What a game! I'm without any words! Genius he really is!
Double Rook sacrifice, my goodness, I would've fell for that in an instant.
at around 25:30, when kasporov plays pawn f4, shouldnt he have played queen e4, checking and going for rook? just wondering
But after 1.Qe4 Kd2 defends the rook
William Ning no fxe4
the hardest thing about watching this video is the off script annotations. This is a Kasparov masterpiece. It's got flavors of Steinitz, Capablanca and Tal. Just show us their moves and narrate from there.
I really enjoyed your analysis.. well done in my opinion!
He is a genius... What he had done here is amazing!
so have i but it's more instructive and enjoyable to have two different analyses of the same game
The thumbnail for this video is the most amazing this ive ever seen. definitely the next meme. a chess meme for sure. who knew :P
Excellent video. Keep doing you. Kasparov was a beast.
+Ben Goodman Thanks!
wiII you are a legend! great videos!
I appreciate the real talk
Kasparovs tactis are crazy im mind blown !
this was a great game. thank you
+Johnny Rock yw!
11:27; Won't Nd7 result in checkmate because of Qc7, Bb7, Qxb7#. Looks pretty clear to me.
Wow! Truly awesome game! Thanks for sharing!
Wow, this really is the best chess game I've ever seen! Thanks for analyzing and commenting :)
Unbelievable Kasparov!! Like this video very much!!
Awesome game, awesome explanation!
+Nicolás Berrocal Thanks!
Great commentary!
Thanks for watching
this is true but by playing h6 black is losing time, and will probly need to lose more time to protect it with Kh7 after white doubles up on that pawn. the flip side is that you do allow the bishop exchange a lot of the time (but white also loses time to pursue the exchange!) Hope that helps, Will
Really nice game! Hope to see more of Kasparov crazy ideas!
Awesome game, great commentary, thanks.