EA-6B Prowler: No Plane on Earth can Really Match

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.พ. 2022
  • Since the Vietnam war, the EA-6B Prowler has been the U.S. Navy’s primary carrier-based electronic warfare aircraft, jamming enemy radars and providing an umbrella of protection for enemy tracking systems for U.S. attack and fighter aircraft.
    🔔 Subscribe !
    / @usmilitary_news
    Check out these top picks for you:
    • GBU-53/B Stormbreaker:...
    • 10 Incredible Oldest A...
    • Meet the JDAM: America...
    🔖 OUR SOCIAL MEDIA!
    ---------------------------------------------
    📲 Facebook ► / usnmil
    🐦 Twitter ► / usmil_news
    Thanks
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 1.7K

  • @BudBetz
    @BudBetz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +540

    Joined Prowlers in 1987. Served with them/supporting them putting trons on target for 21 years. Great aircraft, and an awesome and dedicated team of professionals keeping that platform flying. Hard work, long missions, dedicated engineers, and a huge team of technicians, mechanics, riggers, ordnance, and maintenance managers kept this workhorse alive and well. As Maintenance Master Chief of many squadrons, I can honestly say Team Whidbey, NADEP Jax, all the support echelons keeping these jets in the air are the best there ever was, and I am honored to have been part of that team!

    • @CapStar362
      @CapStar362 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      hey, maybe you should tell that guy Thomas Delgado that there are no more Prowlers or Upgrades. that the EA-18 has taken that role outright.

    • @oldenslo4141
      @oldenslo4141 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Thanks to you for protecting us!

    • @cjvitale9775
      @cjvitale9775 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thanks for sharing your story. I was an aircraft mechanic for the prowler from 2016-2018. My class was the very LAST airframe class at whidbey island before we hit the fleet at cherrypoint. When they sundowned the Q squadrons, we lat moved to the harriers.

    • @BudBetz
      @BudBetz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@cjvitale9775 we deployed to the Persian Gulf for OIF 2005-2006. I had two jets in Iraq at Al Assad working side by side with Q1. No one more I would want to be deployed into combat with. Got to reconnect with several Marines I worked with at VAQ-129 2001-2004. Great bunch of Devil Dogs!

    • @antiquatedflatulence1607
      @antiquatedflatulence1607 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      👍👍

  • @mickemike2148
    @mickemike2148 2 ปีที่แล้ว +261

    The ability to predetonate IED's aloft is freaking worth a Nobel pirze!

    • @slipspectrum9253
      @slipspectrum9253 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Flying microwave oven! Hard telling how many servicemen and enemies ended up have one less kid after being hit with a heavy dose of electromagnetic “STFU” from a flight of these overhead. The ALQ-99 has been rumored to be able to set stuff on fire at a distance with its RF output power!

    • @user-hf7is6ui7f
      @user-hf7is6ui7f 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Tell that to the B52s that went down over Hanoi

    • @mickemike2148
      @mickemike2148 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-hf7is6ui7f
      😪

    • @skoodercrunch2821
      @skoodercrunch2821 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Detonate before it detonates? 🤔

    • @DonB.-Mulefivefive
      @DonB.-Mulefivefive 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@user-hf7is6ui7f When they were ordered to fly the same pttern over and over and it took a few downed to get the upper REMF's attention that maybe it might be a good idea to vary the approach, it wasn't the fault of the bomber or the crew.
      That little problem was from higher ups doing stupid shit , again.

  • @Docapri
    @Docapri 2 ปีที่แล้ว +187

    As a young engineer this was my first “baby” at Grumman along with the A6 Intruder. I worked on the structural dynamics for carrier catapults and landings making sure the frame and landing gear didn’t break. These things could haul and land with awesome payloads.

    • @LeatherCladVegan
      @LeatherCladVegan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      One time my Mum's letterbox fell over and I made it stand upright again.
      Obviously I'm not trying to one-up you, but I would say we are about even.

    • @steveh5307
      @steveh5307 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@LeatherCladVegan Some can't even do that.

    • @andrewlayton9760
      @andrewlayton9760 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Empty airframe was 18,000 lbs carrying a max fuel load of 22,000 lbs and a payload of 18,000 lbs (IIRC). For comparison, the famed B17 had a max payload of 4800 lbs. (I am 139926, Dad was 57576.)

    • @LexlutherVII
      @LexlutherVII ปีที่แล้ว

      very lucky guy😂💕💕💕💕💕

    • @dB-hy6lh
      @dB-hy6lh 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@andrewlayton9760 If that's your perm number, then we started about the same time at Grumman - I'm 138xxx. I was in Field Ops, where did you work, and where did your dad work?

  • @runforestrun3014
    @runforestrun3014 2 ปีที่แล้ว +322

    Standing a few feet away from an EA-6B Prowler as those engined powered up just prior to the catapult launching it down the flight deck of an aircraft carrier was an intense experience. The noise level was incomparable, and would have every molecule in your body vibrating at a high frequency. It was so intensely loud even your soul would vibrate.

    • @keithnoneya
      @keithnoneya 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      LOL know what you mean I did final checker a few times at NAS Whidbey Island in Washington State. What a Rush! Best Wishes & Blessings. Keith Noneya

    • @DOffio
      @DOffio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      A sound that was as much physically felt as heard! Worked "O" level maintenance for VAQ-136 when I was in. I was on deck to catch a bird one night when someone stepped across the foul line and they waved it off. It shrieked down the deck at maybe 10 feet...damn that was a spooky sound!

    • @poysunivey
      @poysunivey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      No doubt! They had to be the loudest jet in the inventory for as slow as they were lol.

    • @chrstfr
      @chrstfr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@keithnoneya I was attached to VA-128 Airframes.

    • @keithnoneya
      @keithnoneya 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@chrstfr VAQ-129, VAQ-137, VAQ-309, VFA-305, HCS-85. Several AIMD's and a DRP. Had some friends in VA-145. Best Wishes & Blessings. Keith Noneya

  • @joshgoodman5667
    @joshgoodman5667 2 ปีที่แล้ว +309

    I worked depot-level sheet metal on these in the Marine squadrons for 7 years. The aircraft were epic, the squadrons were awesome, and the platform really pushed my skills. They were sundowning, and parts were scarce, so we had to make a lot from scratch. Honestly, I really miss these big, loud beasts. And I am firmly in the camp that nothing in the inventory has even remotely replaced it.

    • @gusgone4527
      @gusgone4527 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Is that because the technology has evolved beyond the EA6B capabilities. With other attack F15, F16, F18 aircraft able to perform jamming and EW with add-on pods, rather than using a dedicated airframe.
      Also, talking to some F35 pilots. It seems the F35 with it's sensor array is absolutely incredible at a very similar but more modern role without preparation when required. It is best staying stealthy but when the time comes to go bright, it can jam like nothing else and more specifically tailored to the threat.
      I'm a retired British veteran WO grunt, so if I got it wrong please excuse my ignorance.
      Oh how I wish I was 20+ again with all this new tech to call on. Just to give you some idea. My last hurrah was the 1991 Gulf War, where my well honed desert map reading and celestial navigation skills took second place to GPS. Same as my German, Polish and Russian linguistic skills were utterly useless fighting fucking arabs! Such is life in this crazy world. Added irony, now my sons are deployed ready to repel the Ruskies if they invade NATO territory.
      Where is your previous President Trump when we need him most?

    • @nickenglish1049
      @nickenglish1049 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      The marines need the growler

    • @joshgoodman5667
      @joshgoodman5667 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@nickenglish1049 I was hoping they would do that while I was there, but the Marines seemed to want out of the EW business. Kinda sucked, but I heard the Growler is more of a pain to work on...

    • @keithnoneya
      @keithnoneya 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@gusgone4527 Trump was Socialist media blasted and a senile man they wanted they wanted to control is now in the white house. Sniff Sniff!

    • @BudBetz
      @BudBetz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@gusgone4527 Gus, no other platform had the capabilities the Prowler carried. Sure there are other airframes that have jamming and self preservation capabilities, but nowhere near that of the Prowler. There is a reason strike groups are led by and won’t strike without Prowlers and now Growlers.
      Technology has improved so much since the Prowler came into service, but no other aircraft flying today could do what an ICAP 3 EA-6B could with its crew of four. Had production lines of Grumman remained operable, the A-6, EA-6B, and maybe even the F-14, improved airframes with modern avionics would be in production still.
      There’s a lot to be said for go-fast jets with guns and missiles, but if they can’t be seen because of jamming effectiveness of a 4-man crew, those go-fast are just real good at air superiority away from the strike group while they do their thing.

  • @kakneeland
    @kakneeland 2 ปีที่แล้ว +315

    Huge fan of this platform since I read Flight of the Intruder as teenager dreaming about Naval Aviation in the original Top Gun era. Here's to all the men and women who supported, flew, and were supported by the Intruder and her variants!

    • @BazingaTing
      @BazingaTing 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Theres also a film called Flight of the Intruder . Its a bit 'Hollywood' but still a good film

    • @dianapennepacker6854
      @dianapennepacker6854 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      EW planes are so underrated, and I've always wondered how good they work today.
      I've never seen a modern video about how the systems work. Just they jam, detect, frequencies. Just footage even if it is not state out of the art. They are like explaining a car can move forward due to engines and wheels. It's elementary so if anyone has a good tactical and scientific visual video let me know

    • @Spacegoat92
      @Spacegoat92 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@BazingaTing Cole Virgil Cole...

    • @defcon1africa676
      @defcon1africa676 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same

    • @olafb.2929
      @olafb.2929 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Spacegoat92 a great movie, Cole Virgil Cole.

  • @keithhendrickson8522
    @keithhendrickson8522 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I worked for VAQ-130 throughout the transition from EA-6B to EA-18G in 2011. Our squadron flew the Prowler in support of OEF and OIF off CVN-75 (Truman). I always thought the Prowler was beautiful, even though many considered it ugly. Loved it only like a parent could.

    • @fredlaughlin6343
      @fredlaughlin6343 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I was in VAQ-130 @ NAS Alameda through 1974 in EKA-3Bs. Got out just as they transitioned to the EA-6B and transfered to Whidby Island. Often wish I had stayed in for 30 years.

    • @adanrodriguez3865
      @adanrodriguez3865 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was with VAQ-130 ZAPPERS from 74-78 NAS WHIDBEY ISLAND. Plank owners on the USS NIMITZ. Last deployment for me was on the USS FORRESTAL 78.

    • @keithhendrickson8522
      @keithhendrickson8522 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nice! Fellow Zappers :) Oldest electronic attack squadron in the Navy!

    • @tacwolf4962
      @tacwolf4962 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I was in VAQ-132 when we went through the transition and then deployed to Al Assad for the first expeditionary deployment of the platform. Such an awesome platform and highly underrated in the battlespace other than those that have worked on them and with them.

  • @ValkyrieMagnus
    @ValkyrieMagnus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I grew up in a small Navy town because my father worked on the Prowlers. He went on 4 cruises as an aviation electrician. Because it carried 4 people it was also called the family car.

    • @kennethlindahl9206
      @kennethlindahl9206 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I lived on whidbey too
      My dad is a AEC (once a chief always a chief) we got there in 76 left in 85
      I wonder if we knew each other

    • @ValkyrieMagnus
      @ValkyrieMagnus 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My dad was stationed there in 1976 and retired in 1983. He was in the Squadron’s Lancers and Scorpions. My dad was also a Chief.

    • @kennethlindahl9206
      @kennethlindahl9206 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ValkyrieMagnus VAQ 131 go Lancers my dad was in there too
      We gota know each other
      Went to oak harbor jr high and all the elementary schools
      Almost married Maggie Elrich
      I live in Spokane now

    • @mieman8693
      @mieman8693 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The VAQ-139 Cougars were the place to be so says a retired Chief

  • @michaelmoyer8892
    @michaelmoyer8892 2 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    I'm a retired U.S. Marine I've worked with all of the aircraft in your video, in ground support. Except the F-35. I'm a retired Gunnery Sergeant.

    • @franklenihan
      @franklenihan 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I was stationed at MCAS El Toro 1989-1991... were you ever there? I was with CSSD-14 1st FSSG Det Bravo

  • @jarhead4801
    @jarhead4801 2 ปีที่แล้ว +118

    Hands down one of my favorites.Especially considering it’s capabilities during my tenure. Seeing it along with the F-4 gave a feeling of safety.

    • @vicentetroyhunt4980
      @vicentetroyhunt4980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @William Bly
      I agree with you 100%.
      I was a AD Jet Mechanic for VS22 Squadron (S3 Viking Aircraft)
      Deployed on the US John F. Kennedy CV67.
      1984 to 1988.
      The EA6B was fantastic to be around. Only 4 Aircraft issue to each Squadron for deployment.
      You couldn't get permission to sit inside of the aircraft because of Secret equipment the aircraft was carrying on board.

    • @vicentetroyhunt4980
      @vicentetroyhunt4980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @William Bly
      Roger that

    • @BoomerKeith1
      @BoomerKeith1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I know that we have far more advanced aircraft now, but the era of the Prowler, Corsair II and Phantom was such an incredible era of US military aviation. The Phantom remains my all time favorite aircraft.

    • @BoomerKeith1
      @BoomerKeith1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@vicentetroyhunt4980 You were part of such a great era of naval aviation. Obviously we have much more advanced and effective assets now, but the era of the F4/A7/E6/S3 was just awesome. Thank you for your service!

  • @caseroj6020
    @caseroj6020 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    In college one of the university support staff who worked in our engineering department was a former navy veteran. This was about the time of the first gulf war and he told me the most impressive planes he ever saw launch of a carrier flight deck were the A6 Intruder and EA-6B Prowler. He spoke with admiration about the indestructible ruggedness of those planes that allowed them to fly in weather that would ground everything else in the carrier wing!

    • @noyopacific
      @noyopacific หลายเดือนก่อน

      I had a friend who was an A6 navigator in Vietnam. He told me that one of it's most useful characteristics was the size of destructive payload that it could launch from the deck of a carrier. This was not among the A-6's design criteria. The F-111 also had a useful mission that was not a specific design objective. This was it's extended low altitude flight range. This characteristic allowed the F-111 to sneak into Libya from a low enough altitude that it was undetectable by radar.

    • @MyBelch
      @MyBelch 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      "*former* Navy veteran" How does that work?

  • @Rhino1277HotRails
    @Rhino1277HotRails 2 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    One of the most underrecocnized aircraft. All day all night against any air defense system . EVER. And it flew off carriers. Fly low. Direct attack on enemy air defense systems. This aircraft never got the credit it deserved.

    • @DANIAC262
      @DANIAC262 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It did. Its missed

    • @jimmoynahan9910
      @jimmoynahan9910 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "All day all night against any air defense system"
      Soviet ones, yeah.

    • @alexs-zq6ni
      @alexs-zq6ni 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It was the ace up the sleeve

    • @Rhino1277HotRails
      @Rhino1277HotRails 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This airplane It outlasted its contract. Only Phantom has done that. To serve that long and in amongst the heaviest and most dangerous air defense systems we've faced.. I think 4 Indruders were shot down In viet nam. Two by anti aircraftartillery two unconfirmed. Cause. no losses in the air over the Gulf. Grumman Ironworks baby

    • @Rhino1277HotRails
      @Rhino1277HotRails 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jimmoynahan9910 who else?

  • @mpersad
    @mpersad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    A great aircraft that will get the attention it deserves only after it's retirement. That happens quite often.

    • @burntkat
      @burntkat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's already been retired for 3 years.

    • @blinkguy4ever
      @blinkguy4ever 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@burntkat LOL. I thought it was 2 years ago.. damn, time does fly by

    • @quitequiet5281
      @quitequiet5281 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ; )

    • @mpersad
      @mpersad 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@burntkat Ooops! Thank you for that!

    • @gautumbuddhabuddha8234
      @gautumbuddhabuddha8234 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s more than what meets the eye. US undoubtedly provoked Russia & was found digging deep in its backyard
      US HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO ATTACK ON AFGHANISTAN PALESTINE IRAN LIBYA IRAQ VIETNAM SYRIA etc
      BUT RUSSIA NOT ALLOWED TO PROTECT IT'S CITIZENS COUNTRY FROM THE HYPOCRISY OF USA

  • @keithnoneya
    @keithnoneya 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Yep one of the coolest little unknown aircraft platforms the public didn't know about. They were pretty cool because they would fly just outside the enemy radar while a supersonic strike force was inbound. Just before the strike force broke into enemy radar detection the EA-6B's would light up the jamming pods. The enemies radars would go nuts and they knew some crap was inbound, but couldn't tell from what direction and where they were going after the strike. They also used to have some Communications jammers onboard too, at least in the EXCAP birds. As an ATAN through AT1 (Aviation Electronics Technician) I worked on three versions of these jammers, the EA-6A, EA-6B EXCAP & the EA-6B ICAP II. We were loud and proud up there at NAS Whidbey Is. in Washington State. Thanks for sharing. Best Wishes & Blessings. Keith Noneya

    • @Laserblade
      @Laserblade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm a plank holder of VAQ-137, NAS Whidbey. Squadron commissioned 1973.

    • @keithnoneya
      @keithnoneya 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Laserblade Hey Shippy!!!!! I was I was an ATAN-AT2 there around 82-86, somewhere in there. LOL

    • @Laserblade
      @Laserblade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@keithnoneya Hey man, thank you for your service!

    • @keithnoneya
      @keithnoneya 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Laserblade Hey thanks for your service too, shippy!

  • @theironblitz
    @theironblitz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Having been a Final Checker in the Navy, inspecting my FA-18 A/B/C/D's, to clear them for takeoff, I despise this plane; every time one of the EA-6B's took off (even as we were standing much further to the side) the amount of hot carrier deck debris that its weird engines threw on everyone was painful and atrocious. However, as an Aviation Electronics Tech (avionics) and an American, I agree with you, this aircraft was badass.

    • @Rook137
      @Rook137 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤣🤣

  • @jpa435
    @jpa435 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Sad to see it go... Those were tanks. Northop Grumman got us through WW2, Korea, Vietnam, the Coldwar, and the current conflicts in the middle east. Such a great company. Made such great reliable aircraft, which were way ahead of their time.

    • @simpsonfan13
      @simpsonfan13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Also landed us on the moon with the Lunar Module.

  • @yellowboxster06
    @yellowboxster06 2 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    I have a slightly different view of the world on this aircraft, one created by having tested the effectiveness of the ALQ-99 for its intended purpose. The EF111 was very similar in capability and despite inter-service rivalry it was good that at least one of those two platforms survived as long as they did. It’s more than just retiring the aging equipment; in human terms you reduce your EW experience base as well and that’s sad. Sooner or later there’ll be a demand for that capability; one that can’t be addressed by the rhetoric of today’s decision maker’s. So with luck some of the EA-6 fleet will be in flyable storage at least until we’ve seen whether or not the promises of the new technology can be met.

    • @RobertJones-ux6nc
      @RobertJones-ux6nc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      EA-6B's replaced the EF-111's in the Air Force for a bit until that was replaced by other Aircraft. According to what I heard back in the 90s.

    • @AA-xo9uw
      @AA-xo9uw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@RobertJones-ux6nc Air Force crews flew the Prowler in four joint Navy/Air Force expeditionary squadrons - Purple Prowlers - VAQ-128, VAQ-133, VAQ-134 and VAQ-143 - on three month deployments from land bases following retirement of the Raven.

    • @mongosanchez6051
      @mongosanchez6051 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@AA-xo9uw VAQ142 was the fourth. 143 was stood up as a fifth, but was decommissioned shortly afterwards.

    • @BoomerKeith1
      @BoomerKeith1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Both amazing aircrafts, however, I think it's a bit shortsighted to think that the capabilities of today's EW assets aren't as effective as they once were. Given the advancements in technology/systems, (thinking specifically about the F15-EX), we're not hurting for capable ECW assets.

    • @keithnoneya
      @keithnoneya 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I certainly hope so, but by the time they get the systems up, the parts manufactures to make new parts, the maintenance crews educated to maintain it and the crew up to speed on flying the plane, the conflict would probably be over. Unless the Navy's keeping a few flying somewhere it's very unlikely the plane will ever come back. Best Wishes & Blessings. Keith Noneya Former EA-6B Avionics Technician and Retired U.S. Navy

  • @kovi454
    @kovi454 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Grew up not to far from Whidbey Island Naval Air Station. Could hear EA-6B's for miles around. I was always astonished how such a small plane in the sky could sound like mt.saint Helens was erupting again. Was amazing to see it flying around the Skagit valley, the sound from it's loud engines echoing around the valley. Now mainly see EA-18's flying around the valley. I'll say they certainly are quieter, but it is quiet nostalgic when they throttle up to head back to base, almost brining back the roar they valley inhabitants we're so use to when the EA-6B soared overhead.

    • @AA-xo9uw
      @AA-xo9uw 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The NIMBYSs, who have all moved to Whidbey long after Ault Field came into existence, are more opposed to the Growler than they were the Prowler.

  • @amazingblue1955
    @amazingblue1955 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I was with VMAQ-2 1977 to 1980 as a ECM tech. First with EA-6A, the EA-6B. We were Playboys then later changed to Death Jesters after I was gone

    • @averymanning2419
      @averymanning2419 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was in I - level Maintenance for group 14 from 77 to 79. Was in the com/nav shop. I remember well the EA-6A and B, they were parked between the A4Ms and the A6Es.

  • @BoyBacon5051
    @BoyBacon5051 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This is the plane my Dad would work on when he was in the navy for 8 or so years. Really cool plane.

  • @sharizabel4204
    @sharizabel4204 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I flew the Prowler in VAQ-128 and EF-111 in the 429th FS as an Air Force EWO. Both were awesome aircraft.

    • @thisismagacountry1318
      @thisismagacountry1318 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Would you say its safe for one pilot operation?
      Might like one from auction.

    • @sharizabel4204
      @sharizabel4204 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not safe for one pilot ops. There are emergency circuit breakers in the back that need to be accessed. The front right seat was the primary radio and navigation though not a pilot’s seat. Although those of us in the other seats including the front right were instrument qualified. That gave us IFR capability to dual pilot mins. It would take a lot to convert it so that the left seat could control everything. Even then the visibility would be problematic from only the front left.

    • @brettt777
      @brettt777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Never heard of VAQ-128. When I was at Whidbey from 78-89, VAQ-129 was the training squadron and VAQ-130 to 141were the active squadrons.

  • @marbleman52
    @marbleman52 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Another plane that was used during Viet Nam for ECM work was the A-3 Skywarrior. I was in an ECM squadron 71-75...VAQ-33..based at N.A.S., Norfolk. We had four A-3's with the designation of ERA-3B. We also had some A-4 Skyhawks, two F-4's, and one EC-121 Super Constellation. We were an ECM squadron with the mission to train the fleet in how ECM works and how to use it and detect it when the enemy used it against us and how to counter it. Our jets carried all kinds of jamming pods and radars, chaff dispensers, etc. We didn't deploy, we were a permanent land based squadron.

    • @alexburke1899
      @alexburke1899 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The flight sim DCS has a free A4e that is modeled really well according to former pilots. Super fun plane to fly due to crazy roll rate!

    • @Gravonic
      @Gravonic 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They have a skywarrior on display at NAS Whidby Island.

    • @Rook137
      @Rook137 ปีที่แล้ว

      Love the A-3
      did 4 years with EA-6B "ROOKS"

  • @ElementX32
    @ElementX32 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Man, this takes me back to my Navy days as part of VF-32 during Desert Shield / Desert Storm. I remember being on the flight deck as a plane captain and hearing the air boss saying "Prowler in the break" or "Tomcat in the break" I sure miss those days.

  • @fshanks46
    @fshanks46 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I was an honor to serve in a Prowler Squadron...VAQ-140 Patriots based out of Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island, WA. The Prowler was an awesome aircraft. And while I know that military aircraft has the be replaced with newer aircraft, I was really sad that it had to be retired.

    • @METALWERX
      @METALWERX 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I too served with the Patriots 89-92

  • @E_Dubb75
    @E_Dubb75 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Air Force guy here and I tell you what, after reading all of the comments below, I feel better knowing I wasn't the only one left intimidated by the sound of a Prowler jet. Having worked at Andrews until I retired, I can remember every so often hearing the sound of a jet sweeping over my shop. Knowing the difference in sound between most of the AF fighter jets, the Navy Prowler seem to always have a loud, scary pitch of sound as if it was going to hard crash into my building for some reason. One day, I managed to catch one in the middle of a landing formation break (carrier break), and as it flew maybe just over 700 feet above from where I was standing it left me speechless!

    • @RCAvhstape
      @RCAvhstape 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes, each aircraft has a distinctive sound and you get to know them. The sound of a Prowler's engines have a weird howl to them when they adjust the throttles in the landing pattern. Some jets I like the sound of, the Prowler not so much. Of course now that it's gone we'll miss it.

    • @Laserblade
      @Laserblade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That was a Pratt & Whitney J-52 you were hearing.
      I worked AIMD ADJ on Enterprise, and had to trim those engines on a test stand at 100% - standing close enough to trim the fuel control with an allen wrench. Only engine that ever made my nose bleed. That sonic energy goes right through you.

    • @h2s142
      @h2s142 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I loved doing high power engine trims. Made your teeth feel like they were coming put.

  • @Vicarium
    @Vicarium 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I was a Shooter aboard CVN-74 during OEF from '01-'03. Prowlers at MIL power in tension would rattle the teeth in your head and the high frequency noise would pierce through double hearing protection. Adding insult to injury, the low exhaust nozzles would blow any moisture, grease, oil, and non-skid right into your face if you didn't look away quickly enough.

    • @NickNightingaleYT
      @NickNightingaleYT 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was a final checker for these (VAQ-132) and launching was the most fun. The feeling, the sound...

  • @leesalzmann1
    @leesalzmann1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    My dad was a major contributor to the EA-6B's jamming system and then the EF-111. I saw these in action on the Nimitz in the 80s. Super cool platform!

  • @bionicdan1959
    @bionicdan1959 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    My first duty station in the Navy was VAQ-138 out of Whidbey Island NAS. Whidbey Island was the only Navy base that flew the Prowler at that time. GREAT duty station!! I was assigned to AIMD and while deployed on the USS JFK, I worked in the EA-6B Vans performing maintenance on the On-Board systems. The EA-6B vans were self contained maintenance “conex boxes” that were moved onto the carrier prior to deployment and hung up and suspended in hanger bay 1.

  • @donwyoming1936
    @donwyoming1936 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I miss the EF-111A. Still the only unarmed USAF aircraft with a confirmed kill.

  • @Debaucherousgeek
    @Debaucherousgeek 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    LONG retired, but it WAS a badass in its lifetime. As a private pilot I WISH I could find a Growler for sale.

  • @randym.7238
    @randym.7238 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As a kid in the 50s and 60s, I lived just across a field from a Naval Air Base. Watching planes go from mostly Prop planes to Jets was a real Treat. Back then, when they discovered they could break the Sound Barrier, it seemed they did every chance they could. It shook the Windows in Our House and broke windows in our school which was at the end of the Run Way. Every plane I saw was cool, especially these Prowlers. They reminded me of Giant Flying Bugs.

  • @peterbechard1900
    @peterbechard1900 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The A 6 was the Navy’s B-52. Great plane with a fantastic history

    • @randys6220
      @randys6220 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah right. During a retaliatory U.S. strike in Lebanon during the 1980's it was easily shot down along with a Corsair aircraft by Syrian occupation forces and the surviving pilot was taken prisoner. At that time the Israeli's were using more modern U.S. aircraft and had lost zero aircraft during all their strikes versus the U.S. losing 2 aircraft during it's only bombing run.

  • @stevevanvalkenburg5449
    @stevevanvalkenburg5449 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I grew up in a town several miles east of their west coast home of Ault Field at Oak Harbor. During the 60's they, along with their A6 cousins would fly overhead returning from their practice ranges at Boardman, OR. When hunting or working in the hills of the Cascade range, sometimes I'd find myself on ridges actually above their flight paths as they came thundering down the valleys. Still sends a chill up my back. Today, I watch their successors, the EA18G fly overhead.

  • @scott.c9587
    @scott.c9587 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The A-6 and the EA-6 are one of the most beautiful aircrafts ever made.

  • @johnstreet1812
    @johnstreet1812 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Spent most of the last 13 years of my career ('86-'98) with VMAQ-2. I was a power plants mechanic by training but worked QA for 5 years before moving up to Maintenance Chief's desk. One of the best units I was ever in, bar none. Hell of an aircraft, big mistake sunsetting them.
    Quite a few good clips of Q-2 aircraft (call-sign CY).

    • @franklenihan
      @franklenihan 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Question: I was a US Marine in Desert Storm. Did the CO of VMAQ-2 get shot down during the Gulf War at the opening salvo?

  • @anthonyorr2487
    @anthonyorr2487 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Spent the first 4 years of service working on the EA-6B sky pig in VAQ-134, the very first plane in this video. Great group of people in that unit! Lots of deployments with my 'other family'.

  • @CosmoLewis
    @CosmoLewis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I am proud to have served in the last Navy Prowler squadron, VAQ-134, for their sundown. I was in the line shack so I had plenty of time with them on the deck and flight line. One of the most beautiful and amazing aircraft in my very biased opinion.

    • @AA-xo9uw
      @AA-xo9uw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Garuda

    • @wiserg
      @wiserg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was a Garuda from 83 till 86. really regretted leaving them later on.

    • @devthedudegaming3939
      @devthedudegaming3939 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      THOMPSON! it’s Devyn. Miss you my friend. Also, thank you for your service. Love you. Hope as is well❤️

    • @CosmoLewis
      @CosmoLewis 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@devthedudegaming3939 hey bud! Hope things are great for you as well!

  • @steveshoemaker6347
    @steveshoemaker6347 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    This plane always made me feel a little safer....Thanks🇺🇸

  • @kandaman304
    @kandaman304 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The EA-6B is one MEAN-LOOKING aircraft!!!
    The first thing that struck me about this aircraft is its Cockpit canopy design. It's so WEIRD-LOOKING YET VERY effective at JAMMING enemy comms. networks. VERY INTERESTING!!!

  • @brettt777
    @brettt777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Worked on Prowlers as an avionics tech from 77-89. VAQ-132, VAQ-136, VAQ-137, VAQ-129 and VAQ-140. 2 1/2 Westpacs, 2 meds, and 6 months on the Midway in Japan.

    • @juanetobascofish3999
      @juanetobascofish3999 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      AE in VAQ-132 76-80. Two WestPacs on the Connie.

    • @brettt777
      @brettt777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@juanetobascofish3999 looks like we might have stood in the same chow line a few times (maybe drank at the same bars in P.I.). My first Westpac was as a young airman in the AT shop on the Constellation in 1978 in VAQ-132.

    • @juanetobascofish3999
      @juanetobascofish3999 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brettt777 Undoubtedly!

  • @obxnice
    @obxnice 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Got to love those ankle burners on the flight deck,. (How the exhaust angles toward ground) remember watching a female E-6 when they first were allowed in combatant ships bk in the 90s get behind one and didn’t cross properly behind it like we were taught and he came up on just little power to move to next spot on flight deck. Well with her not paying attention on what she was doing and her surroundings that little blast pointed toward the deck and at her under 100lbs body picked her up and threw her down deck and blew her another 10 feet down deck to the plane handler yellow shirt stopped the aircraft moving forward.. poor lady lost 2 teeth that day. Most times when it came to non skid on flight deck and human body the human body always lost.
    Either way the Intruder and prowler could def carry some weaponry and not sure the truth to it or not but was told by a prowler pilot that just 6 ea-6b could shut down all communications along side the entire east coast of the USA, From Maine to Florida. Also was also told if they were to turn on the electronic warfare system on full it would cook body from inside out

    • @DerykRobosson
      @DerykRobosson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That reminds me of my first time out to support the pilots training on ship. First time on deck watching everything, except the F/A-18 that was turning. Plane captain didn't see me, I didn't see him, nor the turning plane. Went ass over turning the turn as the pilot gave it a squirt to speed up the process. I thankfully found a padeye, and a hot hand.

    • @panzrwagn
      @panzrwagn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I heard, then saw a pair of EA6Bs follow I90 west up past Snoqualmie Pass ski area while I was on a chairlift. They came in below me at maybe 400 knots. The couldn't have been more than 300' AGL. They banked right, went past Alpental and disappeared over the crest, all in a few seconds. Loud machines and impressive flying.

  • @JamesJoyce12
    @JamesJoyce12 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    No E-6 has ever been lost to enemy fire - not unlike the F-15's undefeated record

    • @AA-xo9uw
      @AA-xo9uw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No E-6 Mercury or EA-6B Prowler have been lost to enemy fire.

    • @randyc1954
      @randyc1954 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How about Ice Hamblin. The Bat 21 Story. Weren't they flying a eb 66

    • @allenmcdowell4083
      @allenmcdowell4083 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@randyc1954 Ha ha that’s right 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂

    • @Helo-Driver
      @Helo-Driver 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@randyc1954yes they were

  • @blount99RT
    @blount99RT 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I was a Tomcat maintainer but Prowlers were probably the most import bird in the air wing

  • @terryharrigan6324
    @terryharrigan6324 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    While I am now retired, I helped design, develop, test and install EA-6B EW trainers for 10 years that taught the ECMOs how to operate the electronics within a class room session. Good memories at home, Whidbey and Cherry Point.

  • @whitedovetail
    @whitedovetail 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The EA-6B was a real workhorse.

  • @mikej2934
    @mikej2934 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My Pops flew this over Vietnam. His stories are insane!
    Respect.

  • @Tyrannosaurus_STFU_III
    @Tyrannosaurus_STFU_III 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I was a I level J-52 mech in Iwakuni for 6 years. We freaked out that one time we got a shiny part. It just was a exhaust cone, but it looked almost new.
    F.y.i. nobody can safety wire like a J52 mech.

    • @jameseast7966
      @jameseast7966 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I watched jet mechs change an engine on the flight deck of the Forrestal all while under darken ship conditions. Only red flashlight lenses. Much respect to you all. EA-6As rule. Semper Fi.

  • @StarChaser027
    @StarChaser027 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Always been a big fan of Grumman Aviation, they've created absolute legendary aircraft...its sad to see that Grumman is absent from the military

  • @Avofan
    @Avofan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The Doctor Strange of warfare..
    Highly underrated aircraft.

  • @jeffhoward9186
    @jeffhoward9186 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Spent 20 years working on that great aircraft. From plane captain to flight deck troubleshooter. A great plane!!!

  • @bernieshort6311
    @bernieshort6311 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    A beautiful looking aircraft and I believe it is a mistake not to replace it with another fully designed aircraft for such warfare. Like the A10 Wart-Hog, it is an unforgettable aircraft.

    • @dogboy0912
      @dogboy0912 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Probably leaning on the Navy's Growler to accommodate the lack of budget for a dedicated Marine EA platform. I doubt the decision was decided by terminal effectiveness, which is a shame.

    • @DOI_ARTS
      @DOI_ARTS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Growler is more potent, agile and fast.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If major war breaks out another aircraft will be found to create the electronic warfare abilities.

    • @66mmpow
      @66mmpow ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mcs699 you are clueless,esp about A 10,lol.

  • @cgdrider
    @cgdrider ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This awesome aircraft (variation) was the star in the first novel I ever read about Military Aircraft, "Flight of the Intruder" a novel written by Stephen Coonts in 1986, telling the stories of United States Navy aviators flying the A-6 Intruder - a two-man, all-weather, aircraft carrier based strike aircraft on missions during the Vietnam War. I have since enjoyed reading hundreds of books about Military Aviation.

  • @datsuntoyy
    @datsuntoyy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Love this plane. I was a Marine Avionics Tech for these, Harriers and Hornets but loved the Prower. Deployed with Q4 to Aviano. I miss them. I'll take them over the 18G any day. 3:20, that was one of my birds. When I was with the Q squadrons they had a statement they were proud of. No aircraft was ever shot down when an prower was with them.

    • @joshuapowell7485
      @joshuapowell7485 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I deployed with Q-2.
      Q4 the Seahawks what’s up 💯

    • @datsuntoyy
      @datsuntoyy ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joshuapowell7485 Miss that plane. What was your W/C? Aviano was a great deployment but C O L D!! I'm a native Arizonan so that wasn't so good.

    • @joshuapowell7485
      @joshuapowell7485 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@datsuntoyy I was Aviation Ordnance

    • @datsuntoyy
      @datsuntoyy ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joshuapowell7485 I knew some of them. They came to get wire from us on occasion. I used to discuss how to make the perfect bomb with one of the guys there. Small world.

  • @returnofthestrangers
    @returnofthestrangers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I remember reading a true pilot story of the A6 as a child, never forgot this plane

  • @bartad2ret
    @bartad2ret 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I miss these birds. The A6 frame was awesome. I miss the engines that I repaired at many levels. Salute to a great bird!

  • @charleslawrence2257
    @charleslawrence2257 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I flew in the Prowler in the late 70’s and early 80’s. I enjoyed the video which brought back some memories.

  • @maxchen9482
    @maxchen9482 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Got to see the last Prowler in Navy service right after it was retired as a kid, didn’t know the Marines were still using them up till now.

  • @clivestainlesssteelwomble7665
    @clivestainlesssteelwomble7665 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    As a Brit this strikes me as a jet age successor to the venerable Skyraider familly of Piston engine aircraft .... Tough and too damn useful a platform to let go of till your airframes are almost maxed out.
    Never realised it was produced in that 4seat configuration.

    • @RCAvhstape
      @RCAvhstape 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The EA-6B is a member of the Intruder family, but it has so many differences it's considered a different type. Not just the 4 seats and stretched cockpit, but different engines and multiple subsystems. As for A-6's being a modern Skyraider, I don't know. The Skyraider had lots of loiter capability, whereas the A-6 was a one pass and haul ass jet bomber. I think the A-10 is more of a modern Skyraider, though there is no naval version of it.

    • @jakethreesixty
      @jakethreesixty 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The A-10 is definitely the successor to the Skyraider, especially how the Skyraiders were used in Vietnam. I think they even have a confirmed MiG kill or two despite being in a close air support role.

    • @RCAvhstape
      @RCAvhstape 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jakethreesixty Yes, and A-10s also scored some air to air kills in Desert Storm against helicopters.

  • @duaneschwartz7780
    @duaneschwartz7780 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In 1968 aboard USS Enterprise weather opened up and allowed an Alpha strike. Watching A6 Intruders being launched with a full load of 500 lb bombs and hearing those engines wind up just prior to launch was awesome.

  • @PappyGunn
    @PappyGunn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love the piston engine sound when they show the Herk. Dudes.

  • @leonrivers1684
    @leonrivers1684 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I love this platform, worked on them for 14 years. Block 82, 86, 89, 89A Icap 2 and Icap 3 even the one of a kind Franken Prower

    • @VuongNguyen-cg6yo
      @VuongNguyen-cg6yo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Was worked almost one year in 1999 to develop software for ea-6b jammer management & assignment of block 89 tape at NAWC Point Mugu, CA

    • @brettt777
      @brettt777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I worked on them for 11 years. Lim-cap, excap, Icap and Icap 2.

  • @johnslaughter5475
    @johnslaughter5475 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    I watched many A-6As launch off USS Ranger with staggering loads of bombs under their wings. Complementing them, we also had the A-7A Corsair, which also carried a similar load plus 2 sidewinders. Our F-4Js also carried a fair number of bombs in addition to the rest of their load.

    • @rooftopvoter3015
      @rooftopvoter3015 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Plank Owner VA-34 ordnance guy. Loaded a lot of stuff on these birds.

    • @robertunderwood264
      @robertunderwood264 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @KB VAQ 135 for the 76 Westpac

    • @toddadams57
      @toddadams57 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A6/A7/F4's aboard USS Coral Sea during 1980 WestPac serving with Commander Carrier Group 3.

    • @jamesreagon6800
      @jamesreagon6800 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      On my last deployment in 96 on the Enterprise, the Crew repainted one of our few A-6 intruders in the White paint scheme for their final flights to being decommissioned.

    • @woodhonky3890
      @woodhonky3890 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @KB same here

  • @MP-pz9oe
    @MP-pz9oe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I remember when that Prowler cut off the cable of a cable car in Italy ,
    3 Feb 1998.
    The Prowler made it back to Aviano with little damage to the left wing trailing edge
    but all the people in the cable car died.

    • @AA-xo9uw
      @AA-xo9uw ปีที่แล้ว

      Leading edge

  • @orgeebaharvin6284
    @orgeebaharvin6284 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Prowler is one of my favorite aircraft. She's beautiful, deadly, adaptive and a true legend.

  • @mclark2330
    @mclark2330 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    And I can confirm the loudest aircraft on earth!! My barracks sat closest to the flight line and that’s all I heard for years was the prowler taking off and being tested.

    • @thisismagacountry1318
      @thisismagacountry1318 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That distinction belongs to the F-84H Thunderscreech.

    • @RCAvhstape
      @RCAvhstape 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My friends used to call the "Sky Pig" and they'd have to turn up the damn TV in the barracks every time one took off.

    • @crabtrap
      @crabtrap 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RCAvhstape should have called it the "Howlin' Tuna" that covers looks and voice!

    • @jameseast7966
      @jameseast7966 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thisismagacountry1318 try an AV-8 hovering 1/4 mile from your residence at MCAS Cherry point. No comparison.

    • @thisismagacountry1318
      @thisismagacountry1318 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jameseast7966 Pretty sure the Air Force has it officially designated as so.

  • @racekar80
    @racekar80 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Grumman arguably the best Navy aircraft builder ever.

    • @Laserblade
      @Laserblade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I never saw a machine take punishment like a carrier bird. Grumman knows how to build an airframe!

  • @aloberdorf4579
    @aloberdorf4579 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Watched these guys pack incredible payloads off the deck starting Oct 1972...we lost a few....but seen many come back with daylight visible thru the fuselage.....some aluminium tape and a fill up...and another sortie was off....24/7....Bad Ass Folk !!

  • @chuckpf7018
    @chuckpf7018 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1972 joined Grumman and assigned to work on the EA-6B. Thanks for producing a great video on this amazing aircraft so few knew of and what it was capable of.

  • @Jokeman718
    @Jokeman718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The loudest jet on the flight deck, I'll never forget it!

  • @tacoenvy
    @tacoenvy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I miss it. The Prowler and Intruder were two of my favorite aircraft.

  • @geraldmurphy1428
    @geraldmurphy1428 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It was most exciting moment of my Life . Been on USS Franklin D Roosevelt 1976. I was on the flight Deck laughing A-7 .Enjoy every Moment. Retire Navy Veteran. ⚓⚓🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • @Ezees23
    @Ezees23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I was stationed at MCAS Cherry Point in MAG-32 in the late '80's, early '90's. We had 5 AV8-B Harrier jump-jet attack squadrons and their associated maintenance shops. MAG-14 (the other aircraft wing on base) had EA-6B's and C-130's along with their associated maintenance shops in their wing. The EA-6B's were highly valuable when it came to the Marine Air Wing's attack and CAS operations. I had the honor of being in the MAGTAF when the Prowlers were deployed to "go in ahead" of the Harriers, F/A-18's, attack and GP helicopters (Cobras, Sea Stallions, Hueys), and F-4 Wild Weasels to suppress the enemy's air defenses so the attack aircraft could perform their missions of destroying targets, CAS, and transporting equipment and Marines. They weren't pretty to look at nor were they very fast but they were an excellent all-weather SEAD/DEAD and attack aircraft that carried a very heavy payload of bombs and guided munitions. It was truly a "workhorse" for those who appreciated it's mission capabilities. I was sad to see both it and the Harrier get retired.

    • @RonniE-wl1vt
      @RonniE-wl1vt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      MCAS Cherry Point checking in

    • @user-rw1oj4bo7e
      @user-rw1oj4bo7e 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I think you're confused. I was with VMAQ2 there at cherry point from 89 to 93. When I first got there there was only one18 plane squadron Of EA6b prowlers But shortly after Desert Storm that was split into 3 6 plain squadrons. Vmaq 1, 2 and 3. My point being That I know the EA6 B prowler, And it never carried a bomb load. The only ordinance it carried was the highspeed anti-radiation missile. You must be thinking of the A6 intruder Is which did carry a hell of a bomb load

  • @robxvd
    @robxvd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I grew up around A-6's and EA-6B's. My father was the Commander of VAQ-141 in Whidbey and finished his career with 1004 carrier traps. It was a plane killed by politics which could still be flying today.

    • @Rook137
      @Rook137 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think world events changed and so did roles

    • @h2s142
      @h2s142 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dick cheney sicked the f-14 and a-6f because of an attitude issue

  • @brianschafer2522
    @brianschafer2522 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I served with the squadron VMAQ2 from 1978 to 1981 OOO-RAH! It was an impressive aircraft!

  • @brianc9642
    @brianc9642 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Never thought much of the A-6 until I watched one go through paces at air show. I was floored by the presence and capabilities of this versatile brute. Been a fan ever since.

  • @michaeld53
    @michaeld53 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The A-6 and EA-6 should have never been retired.

    • @StarATL
      @StarATL 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      SR71, A10….

  • @cliffbarnhouse4913
    @cliffbarnhouse4913 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Great video and brings back memories. Did two tours with 4 cruises in Prowler squadrons. First in the early 70s then again in the mid/late 80s. Kind of sad they're gone. I've actually seen two jets I used to work on as display aircraft. One on a stick at Whidbey Island and the other on display at NAS Fallon.

    • @Laserblade
      @Laserblade 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm a plank holder of VAQ-137 NAS Whidbey, we had 4 of those birds and did a WESPAC aboard Enterprise '74-'75. Yes, good memories.

  • @alexp1329
    @alexp1329 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I deployed three times with the Prowler. I loved working on that bird. No matter where on Bagram AB we were on, we could always here them take off.

  • @ronnie_5150
    @ronnie_5150 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I can remember as a kid living near Whidbey Island Sitting out at the end of runway 7 at Whidbey Island NAS for hours watching EA-6B's and waiting all year for their open house for my dad to take me. Great memories.

  • @USNVA11
    @USNVA11 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Grumman has been a stalwart of Naval Aviation since before WW2. It’s been sad to see their fall from grace with the USN. I am proud to say that I own a Grumman though. A little Grumman AA-5 Tiger !

  • @samzavinful
    @samzavinful 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The only thing I will say, There are a lot of "CAN do EASY" Bunny stickers all over the world and in places that makes you wonder how did they get that sticker up there...

    • @johnstreet1812
      @johnstreet1812 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We had our ways........

    • @jameseast7966
      @jameseast7966 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can do easy originated in Iwakuni Japan. J-2s unofficial motto. Semper Fi.

  • @bryantford3054
    @bryantford3054 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Worked around the A-6 & EA-6B at NAS Whidbey. I was told the only aircraft that could more bombs than the A-6 was the B-52. Pilots would practice their low-level skills by flying under Deception Pass Bridge. These 2 supposedly had the world's loudest engines, the JP52, I think. My job was to photograph them for the training videos. Good times. 🇺🇸

    • @Laserblade
      @Laserblade 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are Pratt & Whitney J-52 engines. I'm a plank holder of VAQ-137 NAS Whidbey.

    • @brettt777
      @brettt777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I have heard the same thing about the A-6E. As for the Deception Pass bridge thing... the only pilot I ever heard of in all my years at Whidbey that flew under that bridge in an A-6... lost his wings and his commission. But that's just what I heard. No idea if it's true.

    • @Laserblade
      @Laserblade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@brettt777 I think that happened back in the early '70s.

    • @brettt777
      @brettt777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Laserblade yeah, it was before I got there in 78.

  • @skiterbite
    @skiterbite 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I was on a contract in Virginia Beach in 1991 close to the end of the first Iraq War. Those A-6's we're very loud coming in and taking off from Oceana Naval and even earplugs couldn't suppress the noise. My living quarters were less than a half a mile away from the base that didn't help but damn did they sound great! The sound of freedom.

  • @MrPerfect229
    @MrPerfect229 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I worked on all those systems in the Navy at VAQ-209. Those planes where literally the coolest thing I have even seen with my own eyes. It’s crazy what they can do.

  • @sim.frischh9781
    @sim.frischh9781 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    6 decades of service, talk about a carreer. Grumman knew how to build planes for Navy purposes.

  • @Bryan1483
    @Bryan1483 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    thankful for the crews that made this aircraft's capabilities possible.

  • @MrGaryGG48
    @MrGaryGG48 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've not been on deck for the launch of an EA-6B Prowler but the description sounds much like the start of an NHRA Double A Fuel car if you're standing near the starting line when it launches. That amazing assault is more physical than audio. It literally feels like a punch right in the chest.

  • @johnwalters1149
    @johnwalters1149 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank You! I was so happy to see my ship in the first seconds of this video. I served on the USS Enterprise CVN 65 from 1982 to 1985.

  • @M.Huling
    @M.Huling 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I love this plane, it’s sad that they don’t commission airplane manufacturers to build a newer version of this one

  • @nipponhouseplayer
    @nipponhouseplayer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Holds its energy in flight maneuvers like no other! Consistent and Strong!

  • @jameswitt605
    @jameswitt605 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was in RVAH-1 which flew the RA5C Vigilante and in 1965 we went to Nam. We had at that time the first squadron of A6 Intruders to go into battle. The DIANE package they had for precision bombing was very problematic at that time and like the Viggi they were very maintenance intensive on the electronics. I was an ATR3 at that time and while I worked on the Viggi we were aware of the Intruders problems as well. I imagine most of them got ironed out over the period of the conflict, I got out of active duty in 1966 so never really paid much attention for the next many years.

  • @JonathanHallOverAllen
    @JonathanHallOverAllen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    VAQ-130 was my command where I was a Plane Captain for the EA-6B. These planes are lovely.

    • @adanrodriguez3865
      @adanrodriguez3865 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was an AD in VAQ-130 from ‘74-‘78. Plank owners on the USS NIMITZ.

  • @paulviner1159
    @paulviner1159 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Needed now more than ever.

    • @ThatCarGuy
      @ThatCarGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      EA18 does the job better, we need more of them. Only 150ish.

    • @judegebert8826
      @judegebert8826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Operations in Yuma prove otherwise. You need 2-3 growlers to do the same amount of jobs as a prowler

    • @ThatCarGuy
      @ThatCarGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They literally use the exact same radar...
      They both use the ALQ218 and AL99... The EA18 is faster, more maneuverable, carries a larger variety of weapons, etc making it better. Not to mention it's waiting for it's own EW suite upgrade.

    • @musicon1197
      @musicon1197 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      EA-6b did not use an APG-79

    • @musicon1197
      @musicon1197 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      simply not true

  • @NigeUK007
    @NigeUK007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Grumman had amazing line up of aircraft. Great to see the prowler and growler get some recognition as they were great/reliable workhorses.

  • @keyboardbandit
    @keyboardbandit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We had one of these fly over us in Afghanistan once. Supposedly it was blocking cell phone signals for us to prevent IEDs from going off around us, but most of the IEDs we found were based on pressure plates anyway. We only had the Prowler once I think, for the rest of the time we carried a Thor with us.

    • @Rook137
      @Rook137 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That was the first aircraft in to Afghan air space when the USA went after Bin Ladin or whatever his name was

  • @robertohollas2099
    @robertohollas2099 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I loved the Prowlers, such a fantastic aircraft. I'll never forget working on them and with them. Best memory was launching one on a carrier; so much power rattled every bone and fiber in my body.

  • @sgtjarhead99
    @sgtjarhead99 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I never realized how great of an impact the Prowler was until years later. I was with VMAQ-2 S3 from '86-'88 and deployed with Det Yankee, USS America (CV-66) during Operations Prairie Fire and El Dorado Canyon. Left for MSG duty shortly after and never looked back. Didn't realize it at the time, but it was a real honor to have been part of the "Playboy" squadron.

    • @AA-xo9uw
      @AA-xo9uw ปีที่แล้ว

      Det Yankee 5

    • @cappyjack3070
      @cappyjack3070 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Det Xray 1,2 and 3. 78-84

  • @randallsimmons391
    @randallsimmons391 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    As a Marine ECMO, I flew lots of hours in the Sky Pig. She even tried killing me and other crew members on more than one occasion. I was part of the Beta test team for the EA-18/G and found numerous flaws and oversights that the new system was unable to perform that the Prowler did routinely. Even so, the most fatal flaw carried over from the EA-6B to the EA-18/G, that being the antenna/jamming pods. They are the exact same as was designed and deployed to the fleet in the 60's. No update to the transmitter antenna of any band has been fielded as the demand is too low and the cost too high. Until this is overcome, no platform will be able to effectively jam modern generation offensive targeting systems.

    • @dat581
      @dat581 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So you don't know about the new pod under test?

    • @AA-xo9uw
      @AA-xo9uw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "They are the exact same as was designed and deployed to the fleet in the 60's."(sic)
      Should have spent some time down in IMA ECM, Randy, although you probably wouldn't have been able to get into the vans or complex. You could have learned about each version of the ALQ-99 from A through F, like the UEU, the 9/10 combo, low band radome mods, upgrades to TWTs, etc. ...

    • @musicon1197
      @musicon1197 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Luckily lots of things have changed.

    • @randallsimmons391
      @randallsimmons391 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AA-xo9uw I spent lots of time with the ECM Marines. And I am quite familiar with the UEU having used them after the Block 89 upgrades. Problem is, the UEU does nothing to change the physical characteristics of the antenna, it merely manages the techniques sent to the transmitter. That is the limfac and will be the Achilles Heel of any ECM platform.
      We ran tests against static, mobile, and airborne platforms and we were useless against phased array and pulse-doppler radars. Without better antennas, ALL jamming pods will be ineffective against current gen radars.

    • @randallsimmons391
      @randallsimmons391 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@dat581 What has that to do with pods currently deployed? Pods under test are not deployed and the Growler is still ineffective against current radars. EW is childs play and we can jam them blindfolded. TA/TT is what we are supposed to cripple during a strike package and anything newer than SA-11, we simply cannot touch.

  • @jimtincher7357
    @jimtincher7357 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    EW was the Secret War that no one ever knew existed except by those who were directly involved or who had been affected by it. Unfortunately at some point the Marines will come to regret the decision to not replace the iconic EA-6B Prowler....

  • @susanbutler2498
    @susanbutler2498 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One of the Greatest Combat Aircraft ever, an unsung HERO!!!!