GD&T Tutorial 15.1 : Bonus Tolerance

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 33

  • @rohithkare8701
    @rohithkare8701 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir. you saved my exam
    thank you.....thank you very much

  • @avinashraghav8397
    @avinashraghav8397 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi Sir, Good Explanation. My doubt is....Why Bonus tolerance not applicable to Geometric Tolerance applied to Feature? also what is the difference between the geometric tolerance applied to feature vs geometric Tolerance applied to FOS?

  • @ngautam9400
    @ngautam9400 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very well explained.

  • @25parthy
    @25parthy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent explanation sir

  • @swapnilmahadik7112
    @swapnilmahadik7112 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sir the maximum material condition was dia 26 mm then how did the actual mating envelope become 27 mm?

    • @MrSipi1988
      @MrSipi1988 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      if you put the straightness onto the FOS (so not onto the shaft surface) you override GD&T first rule, and you will have another bonus tolerance, in this case: 25 nominal + 1 upper tolerance for the local size + 1 for the straightness = 27 mm. The envelope is guided by both local sizes and form tolerances. Remember the local sizes still have to be in every section between 24 and 26. Tricky is when the shaft made to LMC so 24 mm it allows 3 mm straightness tolerance zone, because 1 mm straightness tolerance zone related to MMC. As I know this is way different in Europe ISO, because here we have to use envelope as a modifier symbol and in ASME there are a tons of envelope method which are meant to be default. To be honest I better like ASME, here in Europe we have hundreds of standards of which topics are written in the ASME Y14.5. The envelope also a method I do not know why Europe do not wanna use as default. If I am wrong let me know.

    • @edwardzheng8162
      @edwardzheng8162 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is straightness

  • @sandeshn95
    @sandeshn95 ปีที่แล้ว

    How to calculate position when given PDC FEATURES

  • @Yadavmadhavi
    @Yadavmadhavi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    hello sir, ur videos are really good. what softwares u are using for teaching.

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      for GD&T software is not required

  • @jayendranm6160
    @jayendranm6160 ปีที่แล้ว

    X&
    Y canchange?

  • @DilipkA-g7c
    @DilipkA-g7c หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤🎉🎉

  • @gvdsrinivas9064
    @gvdsrinivas9064 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi sir, How can you take envelop 27?

  • @akshaynimkar2458
    @akshaynimkar2458 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir what is the difference between datum shift and bonus tolerance?

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      watch this video for difference between bonus tolerance and datum shift th-cam.com/video/biJbN-aef_4/w-d-xo.html
      will upload another video shortly

  • @ganeshbawane359
    @ganeshbawane359 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello sir,Is it correct that bonus tolerance is difference between LMC and MMC.

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Bonus Tolerance is the difference between MMC and actual size, when MMC is applied
      Bonus Tolerance is the difference between LMC and actual size, when LMC is applied

  • @kafour-40
    @kafour-40 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does “bonus tolerance “ exist in ISO or just in ASME ?

    • @MrSipi1988
      @MrSipi1988 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      in ISO the envelope also not a default thing so with a marking like that I am almost sure that is not existing. With another marking it could be, but I don't know that.

  • @mukesh23378
    @mukesh23378 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    can we apply flatness to FOS, where feature is a shaft

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Flatness is not Planar features only

  • @176pradeep
    @176pradeep 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Sir, My doubt is that, Essentially Bonus Tolerance when combined with any geometric tolerance at FOS is same as datum shift when that has same geometric tolerance at FOS. Am I correct?

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Datum shift and bonus tolerance are different, check my videos on datum shift for clarity

  • @abdullahshaikhengineer
    @abdullahshaikhengineer 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The mating envelope can't be. 26+1= 27 as it will overrule the fos

  • @banuvenkatesh3237
    @banuvenkatesh3237 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir where you from

  • @sivasamy90ss
    @sivasamy90ss 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir I have toubt how could I clarify with u

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can send it by WhatsApp or email

  • @shiwangijaiswal1606
    @shiwangijaiswal1606 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Flatness can't be applied to a FOS.

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In accordance with ASME Y14.5 - 2009 Standard, Flatness can be applied to FOS

  • @manujarora9788
    @manujarora9788 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just for info in Tabular Form