Katyal and Luttig: Presidential Immunity Unconstitutional?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @gordonadams5891
    @gordonadams5891 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +807

    President Biden should use the immunity decision to bar all convicted felons from holding office under the Fourteenth Amendment, section 2.

    • @jim0311
      @jim0311 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +70

      Perfect 😊

    • @KathrynTanner-t8f
      @KathrynTanner-t8f 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

      Do it Joe! Call on Dark Brandon, and do it!

    • @Tremblantbroker8222
      @Tremblantbroker8222 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      Cut and print!

    • @eleanorwittering3126
      @eleanorwittering3126 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

      @@gordonadams5891 Wouldn’t that be grand!!!!!!! LOL!!! But he won’t do it!

    • @anamericaninamerica
      @anamericaninamerica 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Law against lawfulness. Only humans can do this.

  • @makalipo
    @makalipo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    Judge Michael Luttig & Neal Katyal - Two heroes fighting for our democracy & Rule of Law.

    • @jeanhendersonharley3228
      @jeanhendersonharley3228 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yes much respect to these legal scholars the best othemf

  • @peteryork3419
    @peteryork3419 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +525

    Keep criminals out of the White House.

    • @JamesSmith-ij8nj
      @JamesSmith-ij8nj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Hunter?

    • @tc7486
      @tc7486 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If trump is the only person in America who the supremes made immune to criminal prosecution, but everyone around him, working for him, or associated with him is not immune from prosecution of crimes…then does that mean if trump as president orders anyone around or under him to help him do something criminal for which they can be held accountable, does that give anyone not named trump the ability to refuse the orders of the “commander in chief”? And does that not render him useless? Can prosecutors right now go after everyone involved in trumps current criminal indictments?

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      How about off he Supreme Court.

    • @JamesSmith-ij8nj
      @JamesSmith-ij8nj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @fifermcgee5971 Not being able to define what a woman is not criminal...

    • @cafewa100
      @cafewa100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Trump must never again have the keys to the White House.

  • @carolmendez4106
    @carolmendez4106 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

    We must all speak up and stand up to DEMOCRACY. VOTE BLUE AMERICA 🇺🇸. THESE JUDGES ARE CORRUPT AND MUST REMOVED.

    • @barbaraclary8264
      @barbaraclary8264 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      For Democracy, no?

    • @susanfrancis5471
      @susanfrancis5471 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@barbaraclary8264
      Yep, for Democracy.

    • @marygemmacapodanno2035
      @marygemmacapodanno2035 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are traitors to our Constitution.

    • @BLUEDOGLIFER
      @BLUEDOGLIFER 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Stand up to insurrectionists .Stand up for Democracy.

  • @XX-qd6ke
    @XX-qd6ke 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +194

    "I cannot tell a lie." -George Washington.
    "I cannot tell the truth." -Donald Trump.
    "We cannot tell the difference." -The Supreme Court

    • @LunaShimmyDiva
      @LunaShimmyDiva 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      OH SNAP!

    • @Rjsjrjsjrjsj
      @Rjsjrjsjrjsj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      More like "We don't care that there's a difference"
      😉

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Maybe if you were there at J6, you'd know what you're talking about.

    • @JosephBishop-g3t
      @JosephBishop-g3t 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Well said

    • @JLaP
      @JLaP 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Well said and sadly, true

  • @kaceykelly7222
    @kaceykelly7222 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    Wow! Luttig and Katyal are national treasures.

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Respect for their brilliance,

  • @technologic21
    @technologic21 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +347

    That level of immunity is unconstitutional in all its totality. The justices allowed personal bias to tailor craft a ruling based on their favored candidate. What terrible abuse!

    • @J.M.-nb4gw
      @J.M.-nb4gw 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Of course they did 🤬

    • @Deraiil
      @Deraiil 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      100%

    • @sarahkragness7138
      @sarahkragness7138 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      THE CORRUPT SELL-OUT COURT...
      I HOPE THEY REINCARNATE AS SLUGS.

    • @Ont785
      @Ont785 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Because it’s not in totality.

    • @DuffyF56
      @DuffyF56 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Congress has immunity under the Speech and Debate clause EXPLICITLY written in the Constitution. Presidential immunity is Constitutional.

  • @lindabingham6403
    @lindabingham6403 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    Total power + absolute immunity = absolutely total disaster. Vote 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 up and down the ballot. Protect our democracy and freedoms.

  • @XX-qd6ke
    @XX-qd6ke 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +215

    The United States Supreme Court does not possess the authority to create and pass illegal rulings. 'A CRIME CAN NEVER BE AN OFFICIAL ACT!!!'

    • @richardmiller341
      @richardmiller341 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Nor is a coup d'etat

    • @cathygenevie
      @cathygenevie 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      But yet, here we are! Maddening!

    • @DuffyF56
      @DuffyF56 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They did no such thing LIAR. They decided a case brought to them and the legal issues raised.

    • @BunnEFartz
      @BunnEFartz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DuffyF56 YOU are a BOLD FACED LIAR. Show me where this decision was Constitutionally based or even based in US Federal Law? I'll wait right here. This should be hilarious.

    • @XX-qd6ke
      @XX-qd6ke 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @DuffyF56 --- You don't even know, what you don't know there...Duff. You complete a sentence at the level of a fifth grader. I suggest that you possibly do a bit of research and become a little better informed...because presently, you're a fool...

  • @helenwood3199
    @helenwood3199 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    POTUS' oath of office requires him to uphold the laws. No need to utilize immunity if you follow the laws of USA. If POTUS can't follow the laws, remove him from the office.

    • @Sky-Soldier
      @Sky-Soldier 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Talking about Joe?

  • @ronniew3028
    @ronniew3028 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

    This is what happens when justices can be bought. SCOTUS shouldn't be immune either. We need ethics laws NOW!!

  • @v.britton4445
    @v.britton4445 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    These two wonderful men should be on the Supreme Court themselves.

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Excellent recommendation.

    • @nightlightabcd
      @nightlightabcd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is why the treasonous Republicans would not put them there! They are patriots for America, and the Republican can't have that! Republicans only appoint people to the SCOTUS that are unfit to be there!

    • @spinnersea9029
      @spinnersea9029 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      YES!!

  • @shannonlevert3056
    @shannonlevert3056 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +124

    Judge Luttig, I want to thank you for speaking out on this matter, and for taking the time to come on to independent media channels like this one, which are proving to be an invaluable community during these troubling times.
    It’s refreshing to hear a scholar of The United States Constitution who “gets it.” There are fundamental and overarching themes-after all. The Immunity decision not only misses those, but subverts them.
    I’ll do whatever I can to support you, channels like this, and other lawyers like Mr. Katyal as we continue this fight for justice. It is of monumental importance.

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A dummy par excellance! No understanding of history or the fact that Obama killed a US citizen without due process via a drone. Nice one.

  • @carlbussmann7559
    @carlbussmann7559 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    We need many more discussions of this quality for all of the American people to hear. Also we need these evidentiary hearings to allow us to be the final vote at the ballot box.

  • @helloartists
    @helloartists 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +177

    It gives me hope that Katyal and Luttig are fighting for ALL of us. I get up every morning hoping the nightmare will end.

    • @aquariusgoldbond2697
      @aquariusgoldbond2697 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Oh really and what was their answer because I'm watching it now and I keep hearing Trump Trump trump Trump trump Trump trump Trump trump Trump trump. But I never hear anyone say President Biden.

    • @bobjohnson205
      @bobjohnson205 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@aquariusgoldbond2697 And you never will!

    • @Denidrakes69
      @Denidrakes69 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@aquariusgoldbond2697what do you mean? It's Trump's case they're talking about. If it was Biden's case they'd be discussing Biden.
      That being said, Biden is, right now, effectively King. He may choose never to use that power, but he's recently been granted it.
      That Democrats are all saying, including Biden, that the ruling is terrible, should alert you to the right side of history.

    • @Jess-kz2wn
      @Jess-kz2wn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have nightmares every night. The children in this country are suffering from these ruthless , selfish fascist people.

    • @kieulannguyen1193
      @kieulannguyen1193 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Me too. I worry more and more about the thought of Trump is back to the White House. Our children’s generation will be greatly affected. We have to make sure this felon and his cronies are near any offices. Vote Blue

  • @CherylColpitts
    @CherylColpitts 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Love both of you and all who work with you. Thanks for your constitutional wisdom. Love listening to you. Please help our country.

  • @denisedecarlo9311
    @denisedecarlo9311 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +356

    ANYWHERE ELSE THESE TRAITORS WOULD BE ARRESTED AND STOPPED

    • @joeberta368
      @joeberta368 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In dictator ruled countries they would no longer exist - because they would be considered a threat to power. Putin has assassinated his enemies. The Saudi crown prince assassinated a threat to him. Kim of N. Korea has assassinated members of his own family. This SCOTUS is a disgrace and has opened the door to any rogue president to do the same without impunity.

    • @sheridanconsulting
      @sheridanconsulting 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Anywhere with a FUNCTIONAL DEMOCRACY you mean!!!
      As opposed to a DEMOCRACY IN NANE ONLY!

    • @transformationtimenow3321
      @transformationtimenow3321 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In any other decade of American history they would've been stopped and arrested.

    • @weegeelana8523
      @weegeelana8523 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      True - Bolsonaro of Brazil was convicted and is not allowed to run for office for 8 years(should be life)

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      He would have been jailed after trying to over throw the duly elected government.

  • @chetcalhoun613
    @chetcalhoun613 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Very good video! Than you all! Justice must prevail against this wannabe dictator!

  • @GrotrianSeiler
    @GrotrianSeiler 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    PROJECT 2025 WOULD BE THE END OF OUR COUNTRY. AND WE HAVE LOST THE SUPPORT OF OUR SUPREME COURT. OUR COUNTRY IS IN DEEP TROUBLE.

    • @bernicehenson5210
      @bernicehenson5210 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There won't be anymore Supreme Court if Trump get voted in. They can kiss their position and their jobs gone. Because if Trump won he would become a want to be dictator and have control over all ruling and orders. They would no longer be needed.

  • @Kefoo_
    @Kefoo_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    -- *_Thank you, Kettering Foundation!_*
    "We are writing for the ages." (CORRUPTION!)

  • @philapenna5428
    @philapenna5428 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +210

    Luttig : this decision was a constitutional abomination.
    He is a venerated R Constitutional law jurist and scholar, kids.

    • @sandrawhisler1545
      @sandrawhisler1545 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Thank you, Judge Luttig for telling the truth. I hope every major news organization asks you to come speak. I hope that you will do so.

    • @CarolEdmonds-pk7hr
      @CarolEdmonds-pk7hr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      EVERY university’s law schools NEED to have Judge Luttig, or a judge of his LEGAL caliber, as the keynote speaker for their commencement ceremony!! He speaks the absolute TRUTH about the Constitution and the Rule of Law!!

    • @BlindSquirrel425
      @BlindSquirrel425 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you, legal giants, for speaking out. The people are behind you, and we are not buying corporate media’s line, jackals profiting from the destruction of democracy. Please keep speaking out, including free criticism of the justices.

    • @terryzanger7152
      @terryzanger7152 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      And he helped make all this happen

    • @JamesSmith-ij8nj
      @JamesSmith-ij8nj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Scholars don't forget the 14th has a 5th clause..

  • @sandicianciulli3463
    @sandicianciulli3463 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    Let's get the criminals out of the Supreme Court!

    • @Cat-bg2ge
      @Cat-bg2ge 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The issue is that a President can rig the supreme court with his chosen appointee's. And the other issue is Presidential immunity.

    • @varab6287
      @varab6287 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We need a Democratic majority in Congress to change the Supreme court.

    • @varab6287
      @varab6287 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      741 Bipartisan National Security Leaders, Including Over 230 General and Flag Officers, Endorse Harris for President

    • @varab6287
      @varab6287 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are also not allowing evidence to be admitted as well

    • @magsmags5255
      @magsmags5255 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      but HOW?

  • @eleanorwittering3126
    @eleanorwittering3126 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +220

    Exceptional poignant discussion on this grave, grave, grave *6 to 3* SCOTUS decision:
    Shame on Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett.
    Shame, shame, shame, shame, shame, shame!

    • @pokey5736
      @pokey5736 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Time to pack the Court, term limits and oversight.

    • @chopsjazz1
      @chopsjazz1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Those six must be removed and tried for crimes against the constitution: Treason.

    • @Madfunkids
      @Madfunkids 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      ​@@pokey5736
      Yes, unpack this Federalist court & restore checks and balances with non-partisan justices.

    • @KathrynTanner-t8f
      @KathrynTanner-t8f 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      "The Supreme Court has roiled the nation." That's absolutely the way to put it, Judge Luttig. Thanks for speaking out on behalf of the Constitution.

    • @sharonwalberg5438
      @sharonwalberg5438 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed! Since Thomas and Alito didn't recuse themselves and the 6 didn't keep their oath to the Constitution , the ruling should be void! Shows they don't care about the Constitution , America or Americans, but bowing down to a traitor and convicted Felon! A disgrace!

  • @janicegullett8779
    @janicegullett8779 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Imagine a country with ethical people like Katyal and Luttig in charge rule of law, justice, rights and equality.

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ethical? Wow, at least when you tell a lie, you tell a big one. Unbelievable.

  • @bobbieannhowell7
    @bobbieannhowell7 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +210

    We do not have to accept or abide by this illegal rulings, If one person is above the law then we all are above the law.

    • @alexperkins8433
      @alexperkins8433 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      uh we do if those with authority do NOthing heres lookin at you mgarland biden wtf scotus are corrupt bought & paid for follow the $ yeah its so official to pay off your porn star mistress for america ridiculous biden should throw all of scotus in gitmo since he has immunity

    • @Cookie-op2pq
      @Cookie-op2pq 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      This outcome leads to total anarchy on the right with guns for all

    • @jim0311
      @jim0311 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@Cookie-op2pqso be it

    • @StephenLewisful
      @StephenLewisful 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      I would say 'If one person is above the law then there is no rule of law' rather than 'We're all above the law' but it amounts to the same crock of shit at the end of the day.

    • @courtneybrubaker9738
      @courtneybrubaker9738 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Unfortunately that’s not how it works. You need to have wealth,
      power and connections, be one of the untouchables then you are
      above the law.

  • @zeemanzeeman5577
    @zeemanzeeman5577 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It's comforting to know that we have great people like you gentlemen who keep the torch of our democracy lit up.
    Thank you so much.

  • @williamrose2506
    @williamrose2506 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +129

    Judge Luttig, we can't wait for the next SC to overturn the ruling. It must be reversed immediately!

    • @DuffyF56
      @DuffyF56 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yup....the guy who said the CO Ballot case against Trump was a slam dunk and LOST 9-0. Yeah, don't hold your breath.

    • @tenak7278
      @tenak7278 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It MUST!

    • @kjmagnon
      @kjmagnon 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Unfortunately the next SC could be decades away since they hold lifetime appointments.

    • @lauradawson7676
      @lauradawson7676 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Need to expand the court first.

    • @DuffyF56
      @DuffyF56 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lauradawson7676 Fat chance with getting the REQUIRED change to the Judiciary Act passed.

  • @SueKennedy-nb1gh
    @SueKennedy-nb1gh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Niel and judge have got to get gether to fight this scotus...I'm Canadian but God...the whole world is counting on you...I know both ur heads together will stop the scotus..from being rough...please stop them...Canadians are relying on you both...❤❤❤❤

  • @hiltonturner9852
    @hiltonturner9852 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    It's time to amend the Constitution to: 1) explicitly state that the president does not have absolute immunity for breaking the law while in office, 2) term-limit all justices of the supreme court to 18 years on the bench, 3) make supreme court justices conform to a code of conduct as all article III judges, and 4) create a commission made-up of senior federal judges with the authority to sanction any article III justice or judge who violates the code of conduct.

    • @shannonlevert3056
      @shannonlevert3056 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      We assume competency and integrity. But we can’t do that. I guess we have to spell it out.

    • @jim0311
      @jim0311 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Wouldn't that be something to see.. but Republicans stand in the way

    • @CurtOntheRadio
      @CurtOntheRadio 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jim0311 Voters stand in the way?

    • @paulaartandmusic4412
      @paulaartandmusic4412 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Correct!

    • @aquariusgoldbond2697
      @aquariusgoldbond2697 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who's going to do that. The supreme Court they are the ones that gave the president of the new founded powers.#HailKingBiden ♒♒🪐🪐💜💜

  • @BluePhoenixFireandIce
    @BluePhoenixFireandIce 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +104

    Biden must act quickly and with the speed of lightning to stop Trump. PERIOD 💯

    • @michaelmorris4515
      @michaelmorris4515 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      He won't. He's our Neville Chamberlain in the face of our generation's Adolf Hitler.

    • @bobjohnson205
      @bobjohnson205 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Make a call to Navy Seal Team 6?

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who is this clown? Biden is not even aware of his personal activities and he must "act quickly"?? Pathetic!

    • @SusanHMcIntyre
      @SusanHMcIntyre 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And he must stop the SC due to having a criminal on it v

    • @karen-ec8yz
      @karen-ec8yz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He does not have the ability to do that without a Democratic majority in the house, and the senate

  • @stephenhenion8304
    @stephenhenion8304 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

    I recall how Judge Luttig used to support the Supreme Court.
    We Need Big Changes People!!
    Vote BLUEWAVE Democratic!!

  • @susankochan2860
    @susankochan2860 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It's truly a relief knowing these 2 powerhouse gentlemen are watching out for us, and can advise us from here.

  • @mpaczkow
    @mpaczkow 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    There has never been an impeachment of a Supreme Court justice as precedence, but since SCOTUS is hell bend on removing precedence, so I am all for impeachment of a justice starting with Thomas. I would like to see a financial probe of all justices by the IRS. Most of us who worked in companies have more constraints on taking gifts than these justices.

    • @courtneybrubaker9738
      @courtneybrubaker9738 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Couldn’t Biden do that now?

    • @XX-qd6ke
      @XX-qd6ke 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There has been one justice impeached...however he was not convicted (Justice Samuel Chase in 1805.)

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Thomas and Ailto should be impeached as in all sincerity they should have recused themselves due to the fact that both of their wives were involved with the insurrection.

    • @nalou6933
      @nalou6933 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The MAGA ruled House of Representatives would never impeach one of their own on the court.

    • @kieulannguyen1193
      @kieulannguyen1193 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was once an employee for DHS, every year we had to take Ethic training and I wonder if any of these judges ever take this training? I remembered that I could not even receive any gift more than 10 dollars. 😂 but Thomas for years took in millions of dollars and nobody said anything. Geez.. We need to have applied ethics to these judges and all official.

  • @l.joyhartwell3764
    @l.joyhartwell3764 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I trust these two great minds! Heartfelt thanks! 💌

  • @JamesGraham-f7y
    @JamesGraham-f7y 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +141

    Since when does MAGA care about the Constitution?

    • @GrotrianSeiler
      @GrotrianSeiler 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Exactly. To them, it’s just an impediment.

    • @letsRegulateSociopaths
      @letsRegulateSociopaths 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are FULLY DEDICATED and have been working to enact a CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION to rewrite the US Constitution, look it up. THAT is the END GAME HERE.

    • @ollie6004
      @ollie6004 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      If Trump gets back in there will be no longer a Constitution.

    • @angie-gz4yg
      @angie-gz4yg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they only "care" when they demand, scream, and holler that Dems follow the law

    • @larrysmith8994
      @larrysmith8994 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Only one they care about is the 2nd Amendment....the other portions of it NOPE!

  • @sandrapisarski6597
    @sandrapisarski6597 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I love Neil and Judge Luttig! Thank you guys for sharing your wisdom!

  • @geraldharvey8979
    @geraldharvey8979 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +260

    These two men are national treasures.

    • @MaryAnn-r1g
      @MaryAnn-r1g 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      I hope they are passing along their knowledge to others that work with them and I hope people that work with them are taking notes

    • @Soapandwater6
      @Soapandwater6 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Love them both! ❤❤

    • @georgesheffield1580
      @georgesheffield1580 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      SCOTUS is not a national treasure but a national hipocracy

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@georgesheffield1580 National disgrace.

    • @geraldharvey8979
      @geraldharvey8979 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Katyal and Luttig NOT the traitors on the SCOTUS.

  • @SueKennedy-nb1gh
    @SueKennedy-nb1gh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Greetings from 🇨🇦..i love how Judge Luttig speaks...Mr Kaytel should in my opinion be on the SCOTUS...he speaks the same as Judge Luttig...a concerned Canadian...and afraid ..bless both ur hearts...pls keep up ur democracy for all...never give up..i love the U.S. ...we are neighbors..bless all.❤❤❤

  • @Valeriafrances13
    @Valeriafrances13 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +428

    Why can’t we arrest the justices for treason

    • @georgieippolito9924
      @georgieippolito9924 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      and obstruction of justice

    • @StopWhining491
      @StopWhining491 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

      SCOTUS justices are not gods, and T***p is not a king.

    • @V0lk
      @V0lk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      Biden should test this theory.

    • @dominique217
      @dominique217 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They can be impeached as I understand, but as we've all seen, that process is broken, as is the branch of government that manages it.

    • @jim0311
      @jim0311 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      ​@@V0lkhe's got immunity

  • @deviritter5232
    @deviritter5232 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thank you, gentlemen, for your scholarship.

  • @diogenes264
    @diogenes264 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +147

    Thanks Kettering Foundation!

  • @carolrobinson2344
    @carolrobinson2344 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    It is so problematic we have a judicial committee who can and should act on behalf of the American ppl yet they haven't.

  • @LindaBrown-lh8pr
    @LindaBrown-lh8pr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +177

    BRAVO!!!! Call it out like it is. YAY!!!!! Thank you so much. We need you to continue the battle for our democracy.👋👋👋👋

    • @leonardbresland4288
      @leonardbresland4288 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      At trial the juries, after five minutes' deliberations, would find Trump guilty on all counts. Knowing this, the 'justices' protect the defendant?!!

    • @KittyLuv2006
      @KittyLuv2006 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yes 🙏Please!!!

  • @peggiegendall
    @peggiegendall 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you Kettering Foundation for helping to save Democracy. I also on my knees to thank you both Neal Katyal and J. Michael Luttig

  • @samanthamariefreeman335
    @samanthamariefreeman335 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    THANK YOU for holding the light and shining it in the darkness. I appreciate Neal and Michael, two of my favorite intellectuals. Great Minds!

  • @elainealbert6124
    @elainealbert6124 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Something needs to be done about this before it’s too late!!!!! We need action!!!’

  • @gerardtimmons2053
    @gerardtimmons2053 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    We must Never give Drumpf the opportunity to ever be in a position to ever place any judge or justice on any court in America especially our once precious SCOTUS !

  • @summerstorm508
    @summerstorm508 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Deepest Respect for Neal Katyal & Michael Luttig … Thank you for sharing your vast knowledge in this era of “who do we trust”?!?
    🕊️💙⚖️ … ⚖️?!?

  • @ac-twig
    @ac-twig 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    Are there enough thinking people among the citizenry to appreciate what is spoken here? I hope this message goes far and wide.

  • @DanielLe-ko7eg
    @DanielLe-ko7eg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    These two Constitution giants should take this on tour and speak about this issue from college campuses to town halls every where possible.

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They should be sitting on the Supreme Court,

  • @GrotrianSeiler
    @GrotrianSeiler 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    Thank you for bringing some sanity to what is truly insane these days in politics. Judge Luttig is a prize to all Americans.

  • @tinawinston4125
    @tinawinston4125 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We All Must Work Together To Prevent This Nation from being ruled by someone desiring and/or thinking they are a dictator!

  • @mikeatgoogle501
    @mikeatgoogle501 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +240

    BIDEN NEEDS TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE DICTATOR!!!

    • @aquariusgoldbond2697
      @aquariusgoldbond2697 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      And he has the power and authority to do that right now through the presidential act with immunity. He could disembowel heritage foundation right now. And the 2025 project.

    • @michaeljohnangel6359
      @michaeljohnangel6359 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@aquariusgoldbond2697 The fact of Biden's acting nicey-nicey rather than going all out and saving America makes me wonder if he's really strong enough to lead the country.

    • @hammill444
      @hammill444 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@michaeljohnangel6359Oh stop already. Biden would never step outside of the bounds of traditional action. He would never even go so far as to bend the law. Not now.not ever. He’s a strict traditionalist who believes in the institutions-- corrupt as they are. It has nothing to strength. The only ones who can save America are its voters.

    • @jerryvalet569
      @jerryvalet569 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@michaeljohnangel6359 And your solution would be . .. .?

    • @RichardBrady-yc7he
      @RichardBrady-yc7he 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The new rules brought forth are unconstitutional. To change or amend the constitution is not the role of the court. It is Congresses role to change the laws. Therefore these new rules by the Supreme Court are illegal.

  • @paulpotter7188
    @paulpotter7188 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So many intelligent and experienced people needed to counter the ridiculous actions of an unhinged man and his very foolish supporters. Thank you for your lifetime of commitment to justice and patriotism.

  • @elidaenriquez3737
    @elidaenriquez3737 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    This is totally disturbing that a president can get away with breaking the law and just say it's official act. We can no longer say no one is above the law.

  • @charlierubenstein2886
    @charlierubenstein2886 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    No court will save us now
    Vote blue to save the Republic

  • @JohnDanenbarger
    @JohnDanenbarger 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    Add 5 judges before Trump can have the possibility. We are wasting time.

    • @eleanorwittering3126
      @eleanorwittering3126 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@JohnDanenbarger yes! We have wasted so much time… Exactly exactly what Trump wanted!

    • @LRCW1
      @LRCW1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@eleanorwittering3126
      Mr. High Power Rifle & Mrs. Sniper would like to have a meeting with the SC justices & Mr. Trump.

    • @argentnexus7129
      @argentnexus7129 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Adding justices is not the answer. Not being a weak President and understanding and enforcing the dictates and power of the Constitution would.

    • @aquariusgoldbond2697
      @aquariusgoldbond2697 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We sure are wasting time. In President Biden has the power and the authority right now to put more justices on the supreme Court. But will you do it it's our job to rally around our new king.#HailKingBiden ♒♒🪐🪐💜💜

    • @Soapandwater6
      @Soapandwater6 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Should have already been done.

  • @robertjbarberpaintings1247
    @robertjbarberpaintings1247 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you all for a great discussion, and Judge Luttig, that "writing for the ages" comment caught my ear too ... remarkable hubris. As an artist, I never stand before a blank canvas and say: "This will be a masterpiece." My strolls into and out of excellence have taught me more humility, not less. For the ages? Hopefully not many, and as an embarrassment.

  • @kaykeelan4712
    @kaykeelan4712 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    The Senate should issue subpoenas to the SC justices and question them up and down about this ruling and its consequences. Let them be properly shamed in front of the American public for what they have now unleashed on the country. And the next step should be that judges who respect the law around the country should get together and state that they will no longer heed what this SC says but will only obey appeal courts as their highest authority. Time to end the fiasco of giving respect to justices who despise the people and the Constitution.

    • @picdubois4620
      @picdubois4620 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      First of all, these Justices do not despise the people or the Constitution. And secondly, you should re-think what you are asking for here. You would wind up with a patchwork of contradictory precedent across the land.

    • @kaykeelan4712
      @kaykeelan4712 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@picdubois4620 A patchwork of contradictory precedent across the land - that's a really good description of what we currently have in the US since the SC struck down Roe V Wade. Women have rights in one state which are denied to them in the very next state. In some red states they are even denied the right to travel to another state and anyone who gives them a lift to another state is liable to prosecution if it is to obtain an abortion. The right to travel!! Which has always been taken for granted by everyone and rightly so. That is how much these Justices despise the people and the Constitution.

  • @elainealbert6124
    @elainealbert6124 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Ludwick and Neal do something about this!! Impeach them all!! This is not American!

    • @kennethcurtis1856
      @kennethcurtis1856 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You understand that Katyal and Luttig can't do squat, right. They can't impeach their granny's if they wanted.

  • @XX-qd6ke
    @XX-qd6ke 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    "It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error."
    -Robert H. Jackson, US Supreme Court Justice
    (Communications Association v. Douds, May 1950)

    • @Cat-bg2ge
      @Cat-bg2ge 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So why a gazillion lawyer's?

    • @Cat-bg2ge
      @Cat-bg2ge 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In America it's the reverse. 😢

    • @Cat-bg2ge
      @Cat-bg2ge 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Law's are only viable, if enforced equally.

  • @SueKennedy-nb1gh
    @SueKennedy-nb1gh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Judge letting sir... and Niel...pls..please don't give up...I listen to all your media input as well as CNN and MSNBC...please keep fighting the scotus with all u got and then some...u guys are the best to save Amricans and Canada🎉🎉❤❤
    I'm counting on you to hold them all accountable for there actions...praying tons!❤❤❤

  • @ingeborgpadgett7079
    @ingeborgpadgett7079 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    We are with you Thank you 🇱🇷💙🇱🇷💙💯💯💯

  • @kellyhorton5551
    @kellyhorton5551 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes! Thank you both for your service to America and our democracy

  • @dianaanderson2359
    @dianaanderson2359 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    So enlightening to listen to these wonderful scholars and constitutional experts. I fear for America.

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Katyal is a class A joke and the other an "expert"? Wow, what a load! Your ignorance of law and history is telling.

    • @susanfrancis5471
      @susanfrancis5471 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheRealResume
      Go and take care of your own problems Putin.
      Americans are talking.

  • @yettaloyd507
    @yettaloyd507 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Than you please continue to speak up to save our constitution and country ❤

  • @patriziagiacone6637
    @patriziagiacone6637 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    What a shame on the present SCOTUS

  • @user-vk7cp1op9p
    @user-vk7cp1op9p 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    That court has no right to make that ruling. I am one of the people, and this court shows no respect and must be removed. DUMP THIS COURT! So, it comes down to can we fix this?

  • @dannywha8670
    @dannywha8670 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    If everything a president does is an official act then he is a king.

    • @aquariusgoldbond2697
      @aquariusgoldbond2697 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes because the supreme Court gave us our first king. King Biden. And asking he could strip any immunity from Trump right now. Disembowel heritage foundation. Reinstate voting rights. Pack the court.. #HailKingBiden ♒♒🪐🪐💜💜

    • @Soapandwater6
      @Soapandwater6 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Exactly what they want: King Trump.

    • @unbehagen686
      @unbehagen686 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dannywha8670 Hopefully President Biden will make sure Traitor Insurrectionist Trump Walks the Plank before November 5 2024 Potus Election to SAVE The United States Constitution, The United States Constitutional Republic and The Rule of Law from Domestic Enemy/Terrorist Trump and Terrorist Trump's Terrorist Co Conspirators.
      🦈🇺🇲⚖️🇺🇲🦈

    • @LunaShimmyDiva
      @LunaShimmyDiva 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Soapandwater6I’d say exactly what they NEED. 45’s racking up suits n judgements he NEEDS to get out from under. Any president NEEDING presidential immunity has lots to hide…enough that they’ll entirely upend constitution and rule of law!

  • @Bob4golf1
    @Bob4golf1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I agree with Judge Luttig completely! As a functioning democracy it seems outlandish that 9 people (actually 5) can make rules that everyone has to follow. It's not only anti-democratic, it ridiculous!

  • @frankbustamante3479
    @frankbustamante3479 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Supreme Court counsel and judge Cannon should be disbarred and remove the immunity issue, no one is above the law.
    This is crazy Trump committed to many crimes against America, he needs to be punished.

  • @Billy-p9s
    @Billy-p9s 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Persons convicted of felonies should be barred from running for president or any public office!
    We are waiting for the 16th of September for frump to be sentenced for his 34 felonies! He should be sentenced to 20 years in max prison!
    He's such a narcissist he should get a reality check. A long prison sentence!
    How has one "man" been allowed to cause us so much grief!?
    We are sick of it!

  • @HowievYT
    @HowievYT 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    SCOTUS has thrown down the gauntlet of revolution.

    • @StephenLewisful
      @StephenLewisful 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      They've sure put the rubber stamp of approval on it.

    • @CarolEdmonds-pk7hr
      @CarolEdmonds-pk7hr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      tRump only has to claim whatever he does was an “official “ act and the depraved MAGA cult at every level of government will trip over one another to give him their seal of approval!

  • @laurielyon3481
    @laurielyon3481 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent discussion! Thank you Neil Katyal & Judge Littig for your service to our nation, and for your expert opinions in this critical ruling by Supreme Court.

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Another know-nothing - man alive - ZERO critical thinking skills and reading needed to understand the topic. Pathetic.

  • @maryalicecoleman4661
    @maryalicecoleman4661 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Please help me understand how we can dismiss this ruling. It must be overturned. We The People do not accept this!

    • @elenalatici9568
      @elenalatici9568 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Then vote. SCROTUS is literally on the ballot in November.
      If you don't vote 💙 In November snd take 3 non-voters with you, you will never be able to vote again for anything on any level.

    • @phil20_20
      @phil20_20 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      New Justices

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Vote blue all the way down the ticket.

  • @diannadima7082
    @diannadima7082 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We the Jury demand that we know all the evidence. This is our America, our vote needs to be unblindfolded.

  • @betticaroltaylor9681
    @betticaroltaylor9681 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    thank you, thank you, thank yuu for bringing this to the American people and forcing us to LOOK AT IT. . May we be brave enough to insist on an immediate remedy and may we be wise enough as a country to provide the tools to correct the wrong direction of this despicable Roberts court..

  • @DHa-og5dx
    @DHa-og5dx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Remember the GOP is okay with the court. Vote them all out. We have to vote and fight for our democracy. 💙💙💙

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pfft - a stunning know-nothing. "fight for OUR democracy" - there it is, the tyrants have spoken!

  • @BlindSquirrel425
    @BlindSquirrel425 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Yes, your honor, you speak the truth. The majority decided the outcome and then tortured the law, ignored the facts of the case before them, and fantasized about unlikely future scenarios. Terrible practice for any lawyer or judge.

  • @Stuart68505
    @Stuart68505 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks these insights are very helpful. There is hope for the rule of law to be preserved in spite of the Supreme Court..

  • @btbingo
    @btbingo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    The Federalist Society feels compelled to protect Trump at great expense to the nation.

    • @TheReasonableSkeptic-ii4te
      @TheReasonableSkeptic-ii4te 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Federalist Society is really the Royalist Society. Pretty clear that they want king to rule the US.

    • @courtneybrubaker9738
      @courtneybrubaker9738 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All six have ties to them going back decades. Mitch said he got the list of candidates from the federalist society. Wanted them
      Young so they could influence decades decisions for the ultra right. Vile.

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      At the destruction of the nation.

    • @angie-gz4yg
      @angie-gz4yg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah the Federalist Society wants to retain power for all times. It goes way beyond Orange

  • @bridamc3493
    @bridamc3493 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love listening to Neal and Judge Luttig ❤. Thank you for calling out this nonsense ❤

  • @intuitknit
    @intuitknit 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    If insurrection has been deemed an official act by a president, what is the fate of the election process at all?

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Too bad you weren't there on J6 and did not witness what really went on. Really stupid!

  • @StephenHooper-p1i
    @StephenHooper-p1i 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Dred Scott is a parlor game compared to Trump v. United States. I've got to ask you, Neal, how could you possibly have ANY respect for Roberts, never mind "a great deal of respect" for him? He plainly lied during his confirmation when he stated under oath that "no man is above the law, not even the president." He also lied about precedent, he lied about judicial restraint, and he lied with that BS "I'm just an umpire." Judge Luttig is right, the decision is unconstitutional. Not even mentioned is the fact that by this ruling, the Supreme Court has invalidated the impeachment clause. They have just immunized the president of the United States against "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."

  • @leelevy9955
    @leelevy9955 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    You can't fight evil with logic.

    • @Cat-bg2ge
      @Cat-bg2ge 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can fight evil with logic.

  • @deborahmoore2801
    @deborahmoore2801 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you for your learned commentary.

  • @ProfJoseph4855
    @ProfJoseph4855 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    An outstanding report! 👍

  • @straykat19621
    @straykat19621 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    And all this time I thought the 3 branches of government were supposed to be equal, but it seems the Judicial branch has way more power than we thought, which now gave the Executive branch enormous power, but the Legislative branch which represents, us, the people has absolutely no power to do anything? What in the hell happened here?

  • @BlindSquirrel425
    @BlindSquirrel425 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Thank you again. Excellent discussion. 🙏🇺🇸🦅🦅

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Educational and mind stimulating.

  • @cathypreston1095
    @cathypreston1095 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you gentlemen. Heaven help us.

  • @patriciafrye1713
    @patriciafrye1713 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Absolutely. These experts should be getting much greater visibility, especially now, when the outcomes are so vital!

  • @magginicshiomoin9810
    @magginicshiomoin9810 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks so very much for an illuminating conversation. Just love this podcast and will support you as much as possible ❤ Finally, clarity and elucidation. Míle buíochas.

  • @StevenTorrey
    @StevenTorrey 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    In the presence of a crime, there is no distinction between "Official Acts" & "Unofficial Acts"..... It was a piece of silliness the way the Court ruled. "Staging a coup" is a crime, there is no way around that and there is no way defend that as an "Official Act".

  • @reginaalberty2481
    @reginaalberty2481 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent discussion panel.

  • @dsantamaria713
    @dsantamaria713 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Why, in God's name,
    don't we have Men and Women like this on the Supreme Court????
    🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷

    • @courtneybrubaker9738
      @courtneybrubaker9738 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Ask Mitch McConnell

    • @nalou6933
      @nalou6933 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@courtneybrubaker9738 Yes, he puts GOP judges on the Court that have almost as much integrity as he does. /s

    • @pamciekanowski2472
      @pamciekanowski2472 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I had wonder this for years and years..

    • @phil20_20
      @phil20_20 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Because they are appointed by politicians.

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nalou6933 Ask Leonard Leo, he appears to be the czar behind all republican appointees. He has the final say.

  • @julieproctor6039
    @julieproctor6039 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The American people have the need and the right to see all the evidence before another election

  • @Marywashingtonbrooks
    @Marywashingtonbrooks 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Can this new power be totally reject by the justice department. Can the Supreme Court justices be impeached for treason?

    • @abrakkehakka1357
      @abrakkehakka1357 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It can be rejected. Would be illegal, but Biden can now pardon everyone who violates the law.
      The justices can be impeached, although not for treason. Biden could also take official actions that would removed them from their office in one way or another. Also illegal, but as it is an official act it’s now possible to do so for Biden without any consequences for him.

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rejected by DOJ? Wow, that's ignorance on display!

    • @lifegood1712
      @lifegood1712 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Their coconspirators in the House and Senate would block impeachment. If there is sufficient evidence, like their unconstitutional rulings, they could be charged with a conspiracy against the United States.

    • @susanfrancis5471
      @susanfrancis5471 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Anything can happen at this point.
      We need the Democrats to hold the Presidency, House, and Senate tho.

  • @dawnfarkas5332
    @dawnfarkas5332 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank god there are Grown ups in the room 🎉 👠💙👠💙👠💙

  • @JSees
    @JSees 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    No one is stating what is underlying this....this is COUP!

  • @MrJLCharbonneau
    @MrJLCharbonneau 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We need to elect a President who’s willing to engage in this battle with the Court, not simply comply with historical precedent. If there isn’t significant pushback, this will become the precedent.