Winter Tree Identification Basics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 11

  • @torinkyifh5085
    @torinkyifh5085 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    From Wisconsin, loved your video! Thanks a bunch for sharing your knowledge.

  • @owenbrady3390
    @owenbrady3390 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent! Thank you for uploading these. Looking forward to putting this knowledge to use.

  • @marthathompson2012
    @marthathompson2012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much! Awesome information!

  • @Ian-vk5hk
    @Ian-vk5hk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for sharing, a real good presentation.

  • @DreamsUnfolding
    @DreamsUnfolding 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you! These videos are awesome!

  • @joehendershott2852
    @joehendershott2852 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How do you guys get your branches to identify the tree? Ive found most under the tree have been dead a while and dont show as good of sign

    • @illinoisextensionforestry602
      @illinoisextensionforestry602  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Joe, that is a challenge. Some trees have branches that are just too far out of reach to get access too. For those, you would be limited on how much you can use branch/bud characteristics for winter identification. I usually carry a pair of binoculars with me to help see branches and buds of taller trees. Sometimes that helps out.

  • @phyllisschulte9732
    @phyllisschulte9732 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I missed this webinar and tried getting the handouts via the U of I box, but can't seem to find them. Can you help?

    • @illinoisextensionforestry602
      @illinoisextensionforestry602  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They should be available to download at uofi.box.com/v/WinterTreeID. If that link doesn't work, then try uofi.app.box.com/folder/130173883032.

  • @marthathompson2012
    @marthathompson2012 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You mentioned looking for leaves on the ground, but being careful not to confuse leaves that blew in from another tree. Wouldn’t it e evidence against a certain type of tree (reason to suspect it was not that type) if there were a lot of leaves, but none of that kind? In other words, the absence of leaves would be suspicious.