Lecture The Antebellum South

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.ค. 2024
  • History 11 Lecture on Antebellum South and Slavery

ความคิดเห็น • 91

  • @robinbrown3293
    @robinbrown3293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Hi from Canberra Australia. Your lecture was both fascinating and heartbreaking. We have our own version of mistreatment of people, a chapter of our history we call the “stolen generation”. Our indigenous population were effectively enslaved and had their social structure, culture and language torn from them and destroyed. The stolen generation were removed from their communities as children en masse and raised to be various forms of labour for who effectively became their white masters. Today our indigenous populations suffer similar incarceration and socioeconomic circumstances as many African American communities. I encourage you to listen to the song “From little things big things grow” which tells the story of one aboriginal farm labourer who stood up against our version of the slavery structure and won the support of our Prime Minister. Vincent Lingiari was his name and his story is amazing. Thank you again

    • @jokerhey3582
      @jokerhey3582 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      in thheir culture they ate children.

    • @T.Lspitz
      @T.Lspitz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've recently became fascinated with Australian history and its parallel appearance to American history. Such as The "cowboy" vs. The "bushranger" is just one example. There are so many similarities its incredibly fascinating but each has there own uniqueness as well.

    • @bbmtge
      @bbmtge 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Today.......another liberal. You will never help anyone who isn't willing.

  • @zefdin101
    @zefdin101 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Awesome dissertation! I love reading civil war era books and the lead in to this time period is critical to the whole and it’s a part of the history that many people under appreciate. Many thanks.

    • @a.a7648
      @a.a7648 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sick
      Your children are slaves but they are your children, no boundaries or morality whatsoever

    • @zefdin101
      @zefdin101 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ok? You can appreciate history while not necessarily agreeing with all of the facts. I would even say that if you disagree or are concerned by certain aspects, you have a duty to fully understand what it is that concerns you. Ignoring the past and shunning discussion doesn’t make it different and it actually takes away from the enormous sacrifice that those that caused it to change made.

  • @anfrankogezamartincic1161
    @anfrankogezamartincic1161 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I knew some things,but now i'm richer on details. Thanx, great show

  • @HussarPlays
    @HussarPlays 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent lecture. Thank you for sharing

  • @AmbieUnscripted
    @AmbieUnscripted 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is a great lecture thanks for posting

  • @justinhamilton8647
    @justinhamilton8647 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing thank you I’m just learning this for my own interest and your lecture was so informative wow just wow

    • @semiboom
      @semiboom 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      same here! although i’m taking the course too lol.

  • @_John_Tyree_
    @_John_Tyree_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    "The more things 'change', the more they stay the same." Those of great wealth are still using their power and influence in government to protect them and their interests and property at the cost of those they oppress and exploit.

  • @joanofarc6402
    @joanofarc6402 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Thank you for telling us the truth. It’s really ugly but at least I know now.

  • @nancytestani1470
    @nancytestani1470 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Isn’t that what goes on in the states now…don’t get sick, your on your own..

  • @yoyostorm2343
    @yoyostorm2343 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wonderful video thank you

  • @Sean_Breezy23
    @Sean_Breezy23 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great lecture . It gave me a picture of what life was like for my ancestors

    • @psilocybemusashi
      @psilocybemusashi ปีที่แล้ว

      these aren't your ancestors.

    • @XenonDiosmitide
      @XenonDiosmitide ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@psilocybemusashi what? How do you know?

  • @porte568
    @porte568 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was really great

  • @nancytestani1470
    @nancytestani1470 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Deep South, beautiful mansions, Spanish moss, women running around in beautiful dresses sipping mint julep….growing cotton, tobacco, gentile, hot,climate, southern drawl…horses, carriages

    • @Starwaveomg
      @Starwaveomg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Slavery racism evil abhorrent atrocities

  • @richardtaylor582
    @richardtaylor582 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This lecture should be retitled to "A Timeline of Slavery in the American South"
    It was a little more diverse than you let on...
    Ever been to Winston County Alabama?

    • @avenaoat
      @avenaoat 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes the Antabellum South was a mosaic sociaty and cotton workpower demand began to change the border states to change to be Northern type. The slave export to the Deep South had big effect that North won the Civil War because North could hold the Border States in the USA and a new not slave work founded new state West Virginia from Virginia. The most prounionost areas in the Confederacy were below 20-15% slave population it was almost the exception New Bern region in North Carolina.
      Abraham Lincoln got about 10% vote in Missouri (Lincoln won 2 counties here), in Delaware Lincoln got 23%, Lincoln almost won Hancock country in Virginia (now West Virginia) in 1860. The cotton (+tobbacco and sugar cane) economy decided on the way of life in the South. However a good example for this mosaic life modell that not the North was the first place for a abolutionist newspaper but the later prounionist East Tennessee. The local climate the longer winter was an obstacle for the cotton production in East Tennessee. Winston (+some neighbore counties) had low% slave population in North Albama. Here the mountainouse area was the main obstacle for the cotton economy. The Jones county in Mississippi is an eningma for me why was the slave population so low? Arkansas main prounionist region the Ozark plato region was lack of cotton production so the slave population was low same to Missouri, where the Ozark region was the 3d prounionist region with low slave population.

    • @richardtaylor582
      @richardtaylor582 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@avenaoat all very good points, by Jones County did you happen to mean MS? This group of unionists were of mixed race and just lived in the pine barrens. My ancestors were from NW AL and joined the 1st AL cavalry that formed up from the Free State of Winston at the Natural Bridge there. As a Jefferson, my ancestor Rufus Jefferson saw the symbology of choosing a spot named for the place in VA that Thomas Jefferson considered one of the most beautiful.

    • @avenaoat
      @avenaoat 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@richardtaylor582 Classic Hollywood history changing was Free Jones State, because this county was prounionist from the first time like Winston in Alabama and the movie did not mentioned this at all. I watched a youtube video about the North Georgian prounionists, who was executed by the local State militia. North Georgia was not cotton production area too. I am very interested in the Southern Unionism in the Civil War, I think the KKK era and the Lost Cause school programs in the ex Confederate states about 1890 were the main causes to forget this historical past except for East Tennessee! For me a humorouse event shows this. Not to known but a few counties were prounionists in Western Tenneessee (only 1 county Macon was prounionist in Mid Tenneessee). A young man thought his ancestor fought with general Forrest and his surprise his ancestor fought in a same number unionist cavalry regiment. That was a natural thing slaves went to fight in the unionist troops, but the prounionist whites were forgotten by the history except for East Tenneessee and West Virginia where was so big the prounionism, that nobody could deny.
      It may be the Free Jones State was not exact hystorical, but it could turn the hystorical views a little.

  • @raysykes169
    @raysykes169 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very informative..

  • @nancytestani1470
    @nancytestani1470 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Social class..straight from Europe..class system..and big homes, etc..

  • @dadhirampanthi4849
    @dadhirampanthi4849 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent lecture!

  • @richporter406
    @richporter406 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I Love u 4 this man keep the real talk going!!!!

  • @CremeInYourCoffee08
    @CremeInYourCoffee08 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'd love to know more about this era. Whether it be about the life people lived or the plantation homes themselves. Can you (or anybody else who comes across this comment) recommend a book I could read?

    • @vernoncreviston7330
      @vernoncreviston7330 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks for the message. A book you might be interested in although it is a little old now is by Catherine Clinton called “the Plantation Mistress”. It gives a good overview on some of the issues involved in crating and running this society and place of women in it.

    • @CremeInYourCoffee08
      @CremeInYourCoffee08 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@vernoncreviston7330 Thank you! I don’t mind old books (I love The Art of War lol) so I’ll definitely look into it. Antebellum architecture is so beautiful! I hope to see one in person one day.

    • @nancytestani1470
      @nancytestani1470 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes,

    • @nancytestani1470
      @nancytestani1470 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks, I will look up this book..

    • @williamshelton4150
      @williamshelton4150 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So Red The Rose by Stark Young. Lanterns on the Levee by William Alexander Percy.

  • @milosterwheeler2520
    @milosterwheeler2520 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    RIGHT!

  • @nancytestani1470
    @nancytestani1470 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To be impressed, coming up the driveway….almost like coming up a driveway in England, big, fancy…

  • @a.a7648
    @a.a7648 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sick
    Your kids are slaves, but they are your kids
    No boundaries no morality wathsovever

  • @weilandiv8310
    @weilandiv8310 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not all rich planters had huge mansions... some guys were low key, thus having small farmhouses etc. They were not into the pomp and wannabe-royalty vibe.

    • @Starwaveomg
      @Starwaveomg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most of them were the outliers are outliers for a reason those guys to were evil fucks

  • @nancytestani1470
    @nancytestani1470 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But how did these big plantation owners come to be..how did they buy land, who started it…….who gave the land…where did they come from..

  • @cathlinburkey6701
    @cathlinburkey6701 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love the lecture, however, a gentle suggestion I have is to monitor how often you say “kind of” and other filler phrases as it makes a person sound less sure of themselves. It also tells the listener that your argument isn’t logical and therefore not based on facts but rather feelings. It was a bit difficult to know if what you were actually saying was true versus what was only “kind of” true. I hope that’s helpful as you do have a strong lecture here.

  • @taxthompsonfinancialpartne8354
    @taxthompsonfinancialpartne8354 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those live oaks at Oak Alley were not "cleared" to make the alley of oaks. Those were planted in the early 1700's by a French settler who planned to build his house where the house sits today. He sold the land before building the house started.

  • @vtrandal
    @vtrandal 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    @4:00 Disneyland?

  • @nancytestani1470
    @nancytestani1470 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Go big, go home.

  • @chocolateamethyst
    @chocolateamethyst ปีที่แล้ว

    Crazy!! Who is this guy?!!! There’s nothing jolly about the south for my BLACK peoples during that time!!!!!!!

  • @cm2973
    @cm2973 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do you realize that Linen and Cotton are not the same thing right? You also realize that the north was ran by men as well, right? Are you actually a history professor?

  • @radiantmessenger3369
    @radiantmessenger3369 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kina

  • @geraldbush8172
    @geraldbush8172 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Beautiful era,everyone had their place and stayed in it.

    • @Starwaveomg
      @Starwaveomg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tf you mean stayed in they place

  • @taxthompsonfinancialpartne8354
    @taxthompsonfinancialpartne8354 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    By the way, right next door to Oak Alley is Laura Plantation. Next door means less than 1/2 mile. Laura Plantation was owned by a black woman who owned slaves. It wasn't just white folks who owned plantations (farms). The more research one does about the antebellum period, the more grey the history becomes.

    • @ryckykay5626
      @ryckykay5626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      1:30:40
      Your research should include watching the entire lecture.

    • @hassanmasood2280
      @hassanmasood2280 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      this plantation was not owned by a black woman. thats just false.

    • @nancytestani1470
      @nancytestani1470 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Interesting…

  • @illumnatin08
    @illumnatin08 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hate the word antebellum we all live in a antebellum time we never know when a wars gona start and neither did they back in the 1850s

  • @ChromiumCastle
    @ChromiumCastle ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Says he "won't give a politically correct view of the South" just to do the most politically correct thing possible and make the whole thing about slavery lmao

    • @mrstopanimationguy
      @mrstopanimationguy ปีที่แล้ว

      You realize the myth that slavery wasn’t really that bad has been the politically correct take for nearly the last 150 yeRs

    • @ChromiumCastle
      @ChromiumCastle ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mrstopanimationguy And yet, the narrative that American slavery was one of the worst things to happen in the world has been the politically correct take since the 60s. He isn't saying anything new or insightful. And frankly, I don't think the average slave owner was that bad

    • @johnhenry4844
      @johnhenry4844 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ChromiumCastle
      Bruh 😂

    • @ChromiumCastle
      @ChromiumCastle 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnhenry4844 cope bro. I'm right

    • @johnhenry4844
      @johnhenry4844 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ChromiumCastle
      Okay klan

  • @psilocybemusashi
    @psilocybemusashi ปีที่แล้ว

    you degrade yourself when you assign motives to historical figures based on stereotypes. you did learn a lot of facts but keep your opinions out of it and allow people to decice for themselves.

  • @bellaevans4488
    @bellaevans4488 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wishing this wasn’t all about slavery, so tired of of victim mindset.

    • @casacara
      @casacara ปีที่แล้ว +8

      If you don’t talk about slavery’s role in the lead up to the civil war, you are grossly misrepresenting the period and issue.
      The material cause for war was anxiety in the planter class that they would lose the phenomenally lucrative institution of slavery.
      If you do not emphasize this, you are performing historical malpractice.

  • @jasonarringotn2501
    @jasonarringotn2501 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not bad, I give you a B.

  • @marthalamm2087
    @marthalamm2087 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You are a hypocrite! You are stating your opinion not facts . Every successful business buys low sells high . Your criticism of the prosperous south stems from jealousy . You should check your facts linen is made from flax not cotton .

  • @karenryan5585
    @karenryan5585 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The speaker continually used the phrase "kind of". It was very distracting, and made it difficult to focus on the material.

  • @freelandoliverio394
    @freelandoliverio394 ปีที่แล้ว

    Says “right” too often. Gets annoying. Otherwise good presentation.

  • @bbmtge
    @bbmtge 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another individual attempting to act as if he is being unique in his presentation. If you do not know American history by this point, you are forever lost and will buy into anything that anyone tells you. It's simply the same garbage, in reverse.

  • @infinitum8558
    @infinitum8558 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He's using the word "patriarchy" very loosely. "Patriarchy" is the feminist idea that ALL men control society to oppress ALL women, which can't apply to Anrebellum South, which excluded poor white men and black men from positions of power. It also can't apply because, as he admits, lots of the Plantation Wives owned slaves, which means they do have societal power.
    You simply can't say, "Antebellum was a Patriarchy" and also say, "Plantation Wives owned slaves, and black men and poor white men had no societal power".

  • @jaypoe5843
    @jaypoe5843 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Good ol days

  • @user-zo6dj1kk3v
    @user-zo6dj1kk3v 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Says "right?" too much. Cant listen.