![Professor Creviston History Channel](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 69
- 153 699
Professor Creviston History Channel
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 19 ส.ค. 2014
This channel contains video lectures and materials used by Professor Vernon Creviston in his US History general survey courses
Lecture Independence
History 11 lecture for Fresno State on the War for American Independence and the continuing effects of the American Revolution
มุมมอง: 890
วีดีโอ
Lecture Rebellion
มุมมอง 7794 ปีที่แล้ว
History 11 lecture for Fresno State on the growing tensions and conflict between the American Colonies and British government in the 1770s
Lecture The American Colonies and the British Empire
มุมมอง 1.7K4 ปีที่แล้ว
History 11 lecture for Fresno State covering the growth the American colonies in the eighteenth century and their relationship with the British Empire
Lecture Origins of the Revolution
มุมมอง 1.1K4 ปีที่แล้ว
History 11 lecture for Fresno State on the issues leading up to the American Revolution
Lecture Life in the American Colonies Part 2
มุมมอง 1.2K4 ปีที่แล้ว
US History lecture for Fresno State on the Slave Trade in the British colonies an its impact on them.
Lecture Life in the American Colonies Part 1
มุมมอง 3K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Lecture for History 11 at Fresno State concerning the development of the American colonies in the 1660s-1760s
Lecture The New England Colonies
มุมมอง 5K4 ปีที่แล้ว
History 11 lecture for students at Fresno State on the early beginnings of the New England colonies and Puritanism.
Lecture The European Empires
มุมมอง 1.3K4 ปีที่แล้ว
History 11 lecture for Fresno State on the beginnings of European colonies in the New World.
Lecture Virginia and the Chesapeake
มุมมอง 1.3K4 ปีที่แล้ว
History 11 lecture for students at Fresno Stat on the first English settlements in North America.
Lecture The Americas and First Contact
มุมมอง 1.2K4 ปีที่แล้ว
History 11 lecture for Fresno State on European discovery of Western Hemisphere and interactions with Native Americans
Lecture America Before 1492 Intro
มุมมอง 3.1K4 ปีที่แล้ว
History 11 lecture for Fresno State on the origins of American history
CH1 Lecture America Before 1492
มุมมอง 1.8K4 ปีที่แล้ว
History 11 lecture for Fresno State on the Americas before contact with Europeans
Lecture Reconstruction, 1865 1877
มุมมอง 1.1K4 ปีที่แล้ว
History 11 lecture for Fresno State students on the period following the Civil War, 1865-1877
Lecture The Reagan Revolution
มุมมอง 4084 ปีที่แล้ว
History 12 lecture on the US in the 1980s and late twentieth century
Lecture The Civil War, part I
มุมมอง 1.1K4 ปีที่แล้ว
History 11 lecture for Fresno State students covering the run-up and opening stages of American Civil War
Lecture Breakdown of the Left and the Conservative Challenge part2
มุมมอง 834 ปีที่แล้ว
Lecture Breakdown of the Left and the Conservative Challenge part2
Lecture Breakdown of the Left and the Conservative Challenge
มุมมอง 1284 ปีที่แล้ว
Lecture Breakdown of the Left and the Conservative Challenge
Lecture Expanding the Nation and the War With Mexico
มุมมอง 7404 ปีที่แล้ว
Lecture Expanding the Nation and the War With Mexico
Lecture The Antebellum North part 2 - Temperance and Abolition
มุมมอง 1.2K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Lecture The Antebellum North part 2 - Temperance and Abolition
Lecture The Antebellum North Immigration and Industrialization
มุมมอง 1.6K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Lecture The Antebellum North Immigration and Industrialization
Lecture: The Civil Rights Movement part 1
มุมมอง 1104 ปีที่แล้ว
Lecture: The Civil Rights Movement part 1
Thank you for your content ❤
The antifederalist argument was totally legitimate esp seeing what the USA turned into
Winfied Scott was a (prounionist) Virginian!
@4:00 Disneyland?
I’ve been listening to this playlist in my car, and when I got to the part where you started playing the extremely loud war movie scene I started losing my shit
Slaves come to mind.
I hate the word antebellum we all live in a antebellum time we never know when a wars gona start and neither did they back in the 1850s
This lecture should be retitled to "A Timeline of Slavery in the American South" It was a little more diverse than you let on... Ever been to Winston County Alabama?
Yes the Antabellum South was a mosaic sociaty and cotton workpower demand began to change the border states to change to be Northern type. The slave export to the Deep South had big effect that North won the Civil War because North could hold the Border States in the USA and a new not slave work founded new state West Virginia from Virginia. The most prounionost areas in the Confederacy were below 20-15% slave population it was almost the exception New Bern region in North Carolina. Abraham Lincoln got about 10% vote in Missouri (Lincoln won 2 counties here), in Delaware Lincoln got 23%, Lincoln almost won Hancock country in Virginia (now West Virginia) in 1860. The cotton (+tobbacco and sugar cane) economy decided on the way of life in the South. However a good example for this mosaic life modell that not the North was the first place for a abolutionist newspaper but the later prounionist East Tennessee. The local climate the longer winter was an obstacle for the cotton production in East Tennessee. Winston (+some neighbore counties) had low% slave population in North Albama. Here the mountainouse area was the main obstacle for the cotton economy. The Jones county in Mississippi is an eningma for me why was the slave population so low? Arkansas main prounionist region the Ozark plato region was lack of cotton production so the slave population was low same to Missouri, where the Ozark region was the 3d prounionist region with low slave population.
@@avenaoat all very good points, by Jones County did you happen to mean MS? This group of unionists were of mixed race and just lived in the pine barrens. My ancestors were from NW AL and joined the 1st AL cavalry that formed up from the Free State of Winston at the Natural Bridge there. As a Jefferson, my ancestor Rufus Jefferson saw the symbology of choosing a spot named for the place in VA that Thomas Jefferson considered one of the most beautiful.
@@richardtaylor582 Classic Hollywood history changing was Free Jones State, because this county was prounionist from the first time like Winston in Alabama and the movie did not mentioned this at all. I watched a youtube video about the North Georgian prounionists, who was executed by the local State militia. North Georgia was not cotton production area too. I am very interested in the Southern Unionism in the Civil War, I think the KKK era and the Lost Cause school programs in the ex Confederate states about 1890 were the main causes to forget this historical past except for East Tennessee! For me a humorouse event shows this. Not to known but a few counties were prounionists in Western Tenneessee (only 1 county Macon was prounionist in Mid Tenneessee). A young man thought his ancestor fought with general Forrest and his surprise his ancestor fought in a same number unionist cavalry regiment. That was a natural thing slaves went to fight in the unionist troops, but the prounionist whites were forgotten by the history except for East Tenneessee and West Virginia where was so big the prounionism, that nobody could deny. It may be the Free Jones State was not exact hystorical, but it could turn the hystorical views a little.
@@richardtaylor582 I think the Confederacy could have given more white soldiers to the Union than about 100 000, if the Federal troops had reached Little Rock in Arkansas and East Tennessee in 1862. The North Georgian unionist could escape to East Tennessee only after Burnside liberated that area. Jones county was the lowest % slaves populated county (12.3%) in Mississippi and this county was prounionist from the first day, against Hollywood movie! I am pleased the prounionist family memory is alive. A humorouse story: a West Tennessee origin young man thought his ancestor fought with Nathan Forrest in a Tennessee Confederate cavalry regiment and his surprise he found his ancestor fought in the same number Unionist Tennessee cavalry regiment. Many people do not know a lot of prounionist counties were in the East part of the Wester Tennessee. Middle Tennessee was where only 1 couty was prounionist Macon county with 13% slaves. In North Albama Winston county had 3.4% slaves, Blount county had 6.1% slaves, Walker county 6.5% slaves, Fayette 13.2% slaves, Marion county had 11.5% slaves, De Kalb county had 7.9% slaves, Marshall county had 16.0% slaves, Jackson county had 18.7% slaves and Jefferson county had 22.6% slaves.
Loving these so far. I was having so much trouble finding a decent early American history lecture series.
Canada here. Love your lectures.
Awesomeness thank you
Hello, what’s the textbook for this class?
RIGHT!
Kina
audio quality is subpar in this one compared to the others, keeps fading in and out
It’s really frustrating lmfao, I’ve been listening to this series while I’ve been on the road and I’m having to constantly fuck with my volume
.4th like 👍 from meeeeeeh
Says "right?" too much. Cant listen.
Elizabeth did not kill Queen Mary - she died of ill health, not murder.
You are a hypocrite! You are stating your opinion not facts . Every successful business buys low sells high . Your criticism of the prosperous south stems from jealousy . You should check your facts linen is made from flax not cotton .
This was excellent. A really great overview. Looking forward to the next in the series.
The subtitles are awful. “What Rolfe finds” becomes “what Ralph fiennes”. This is not the only seriously questionable line.
Your channel is gold! Thank you so much!!! 😭 I have to take my American History Exam and I took the course like 2 years ago so I'm watching these videos as I read my course material. Greetings from Argentina!!!
Another individual attempting to act as if he is being unique in his presentation. If you do not know American history by this point, you are forever lost and will buy into anything that anyone tells you. It's simply the same garbage, in reverse.
You turned southern culture into an attack on white men. Bravo goof ball.
Fuck I love history class!!!
I thought Bloody Mary died of Dropsy. Didnt Elizabeth I only execute Mary, Queen of Scots?
Excellent lecture!
Brilliant stuff.
He's using the word "patriarchy" very loosely. "Patriarchy" is the feminist idea that ALL men control society to oppress ALL women, which can't apply to Anrebellum South, which excluded poor white men and black men from positions of power. It also can't apply because, as he admits, lots of the Plantation Wives owned slaves, which means they do have societal power. You simply can't say, "Antebellum was a Patriarchy" and also say, "Plantation Wives owned slaves, and black men and poor white men had no societal power".
So “politically incorrect” to make all southern history about black oppression. Actually it’s all the information that seems to be available. But anyway how’s about another dose of hate for white culture? I came here for another lecture about minority oppression. Not aesthetic beauty.
Great listen.loving these at the moment.
Amazing thank you I’m just learning this for my own interest and your lecture was so informative wow just wow
same here! although i’m taking the course too lol.
Does anyone know if the Council of New England and the relatively newer Massachusetts Bay Colony were allies or rivals?
Says he "won't give a politically correct view of the South" just to do the most politically correct thing possible and make the whole thing about slavery lmao
You realize the myth that slavery wasn’t really that bad has been the politically correct take for nearly the last 150 yeRs
@@mrstopanimationguy And yet, the narrative that American slavery was one of the worst things to happen in the world has been the politically correct take since the 60s. He isn't saying anything new or insightful. And frankly, I don't think the average slave owner was that bad
@@ChromiumCastle Bruh 😂
@@johnhenry4844 cope bro. I'm right
@@ChromiumCastle Okay klan
Thank you so much for these videos, they are really entertaining and clear : )
Love the lecture, however, a gentle suggestion I have is to monitor how often you say “kind of” and other filler phrases as it makes a person sound less sure of themselves. It also tells the listener that your argument isn’t logical and therefore not based on facts but rather feelings. It was a bit difficult to know if what you were actually saying was true versus what was only “kind of” true. I hope that’s helpful as you do have a strong lecture here.
Isn’t that what goes on in the states now…don’t get sick, your on your own..
But how did these big plantation owners come to be..how did they buy land, who started it…….who gave the land…where did they come from..
Social class..straight from Europe..class system..and big homes, etc..
Go big, go home.
To be impressed, coming up the driveway….almost like coming up a driveway in England, big, fancy…
Deep South, beautiful mansions, Spanish moss, women running around in beautiful dresses sipping mint julep….growing cotton, tobacco, gentile, hot,climate, southern drawl…horses, carriages
Slavery racism evil abhorrent atrocities
Not bad, I give you a B.
For real lol ...
Possible maternal heritage of mine lol.....
George Bourne, Presybterian/Dutch Reformed, prolific writer against American slavery and Roman Catholicism, who worked with Garrison, demanded all slaves be freed immediately, immediate Abolition or God would bring divine judgement on the country (1818). Bourne insisted that slave owners be excluded from churches as unrepentant sinners, until they repented. Bourne used his extensive knowledge of Hebrew to argue the Bible forbid slavery, and that certain verses had been poorly translated into English as well as being taken out of context by hypocritical pro-slavery thinkers. He insists that slave owners were man stealers, and guilty of breaking the commandment against stealing, as well as calling the slave system a giant brothel, and also devoted to the sexual abuse of black women (Slavery and it's Impact on Women). Like the martyred Presybterian Elijah Lovejoy in Alton, IL, he spoke against the Pope and slavery. In that combination, they were similiar to Samuel Sewell, the Reformed judge in Massachusetts who wrote the Selling of Joseph in 1700. Reading Sewell and then comparing it to George Bourne is very interesting to understanding the orthodox Christian abolitionists.
Says “right” too often. Gets annoying. Otherwise good presentation.
you degrade yourself when you assign motives to historical figures based on stereotypes. you did learn a lot of facts but keep your opinions out of it and allow people to decice for themselves.
1:33:34 I have a question. If the Boston Tea Party was so well known and most people of Boston were in on it, AND the men who did go through with it weren't really dressed up in Native regalia, how did the story get changed to where it's taught in school that it was a secret, and they were dressed up to hide their identities? You probably don't have the answer, I am just curious. This is the first time I'm hearing that they weren't actually trying to hide themselves too much. Great video again
It is a good question. While some of the participants did dress as native Americans or tried to hide their identities. most did not. They did not believe they needed as they felt the community supported them and they were defending their rights. In a VERY limited way it was sort of how the people that stormed the Capitol on January 6, did not hide their identities because they did not think they would be punished for what they were doing or that those in power were against their taking action. After all if one of the richest people in town (John Hancock) is joining you it seems like you have permission to go about doing what you planned. Hope this helps.
Great video