@@heeeeeresrossy Agree. I've watched all the Bond films and this is such an amazing film. Mads Mikkelsen is such a great actor and the fact he plays the baddie who isn't a tough guy, he's just smart and has connections makes it quite believable. Daniel Craig wise, shame QoS sucked (the camera work made me feel car sick, the story, all so mixed up) but the rest were good, Skyfall and Spectre especially IMHO. Mark K is so correct in making a game (poker) which for someone like myself isn't particular interesting turn into psychological warfare is credit to the actors and director. The ONLY criticism I have of it, is I've spoke to people who didn't understand the early part where Le Chiffre 'shorts' the airline stocks with the money then attempts to blow up the prototype, it fails and he loses a tremendous amount of money thus leading to the poker tournament. I think unless you are familiar with trading that needed a tiny bit of additional explanation to the audience as to what 'shorting' is, why he did it and tried to blow up an airplane.
Absolutely. Craig has been very transparent that Vesper Lynd is the ghost that haunted his entire series despite only having under one hour of screen time. She is completely integral to how they ended up carving his character and the overarching narrative. So a rare misjudgment from Kermode but I think one that he has since reexamined and changed his mind about.
I really enjoy Kermode as a reviewer. He doesn't mind if his counterpart has a differing opinion, as well as not taking jabs seriously. It's always pleasant listening to him.
Kermode and Simon just bounce off each other so naturally. I can listen to them for hours. I love it when Mark gets playfully bullied into going to see a film he knows he is going to despise like any of the Michael Bay films or PoTC and Simon is like 'so! Open-minded review, what did you think Mark?' :D
Eva Green was great. A real thinking Bond girl, who was a sidekick and a technician as well as a a squeeze. Best one in years. They've gone very downhill since. Some rando nameless chick riding a pony. Screwing a grieving women after her husband's funeral. Depressing stuff.
Skyfall has a far smoother pace though. And a better villain I think. Silva's plan is silly but at least he does something. Le Chiffre is a Z list constantly reacting and in the ropes. He doesnt feel dangerous and unpredictable like Silva.
Saturday night watching kermode and mayo with the headphones in while my wife watches a terrible film and my sons on the ipad. The joys of life. 25/11/17 Peace ✌️
From Russia with Love does tend to follow the book quite closely. The main change that I can think of is that Rosa Klebb and Kronsteen are not just working for SMERSH but secretly part of SPECTRE, but that doesn't really alter the plot significantly. .
Watching in 2020. It's amazing how much Simon used to contribute to reviews (if he'd seen the film). These days he just sits silently for the most part. It's like he's lost his enthusiasm for this show. And yes, this is still the best Daniel Craig bond movie. And yes, would still have been better without the last 20mins
Kernite doesn’t know what he’s talking about! The love interest was totally believable with Eva Green. Best of the Craig era. Did he have a better time believing it in Spectre and No time to die? What’s amazing is you can easily watch Casino Royale again and again from start to finish. Can’t do the same with No time to die now I’ve seen it once. Shame really
Timothy Dalton was a very good Bond. But he was trying to do the Daniel Craig Bond with Roger Moore scripts, full of glib quips and exploding milk-bottles. His gritty, ahead-of-its-time performance was sunk by camp surroundings.
I do too! I geniunely think Brosnan is one of the best Bonds. Goldeneye is one of my very favourites. I like the way he blends humour with the cold toughness, which was kind of lost in DAD, but thats more the poor writing and OTT action that let that film down.
When I saw this there were some thoroughly annoying kids in the cinema- even "oh no"-ing when Bond was captured. Then Le Cheffre got his knotted rope out, and they clammed right up.
The scene that gets me the most as far as product placement goes, is when he goes to tie his shoe lace outside the Ocean View Hotel and you can see a Jaguar behind him in full view. It's so bad it looks like a poster advertising the car. In fact that whole car park sequence is like a car commercial. But I still consider this film to be one of the best in the series!
Good review, I agree about the last 20min. The movie had it's climax and the Italy part feels like an unnecessary extension. I like Casino Royal as much as I like Man on fire and Collateral. The violence is more realistic and less glorifying than in other movies.
With respect to Mr. Craig's successful revitalisation of the character, I seem to be the only person left who misses Pierce Brosnan. Whatever animosity people have toward Die Another Day, the film is not his fault, and he was as charming as ever in the role. Why not blame Halle Berry or Purvis and Wade or the CGI crew for screwing up the franchise instead? They share far more of the responsibility. It's not like Pierce wanted DAD to be his swansong - he always wanted material as dark as Royale.
Oh man! I am SO SORRY!!!! I forgot this is the internet...where your opinion of something dictates your intelligence level. Please forgive me for not agreeing with you right away!
Good review, but I diagree with what Mark said about From russia with Love not being faithful to the book, its one of the few Bond movies that is faithful to the books.
First, I admire the writers for bringing Bond back to more Fleming-esque roots (less gadgets, more intrigue) in CR. Second, I disliked both DAD and QoS but for different reasons. Third, I still prefer Pierce AS Bond (more sophisticated and stylish, and you actually believed he could have gone to Eton).
The film is A fresh reinvention of the 007 films as the film’s action packed, well acted, stylish, well directed, intense & thrilling. (88%) (4.5/5 stars) (positive)
Not in places not a film to see with your mother (said place being seeing Le Chiffre’s girlfriend on the balcony and asking very loudly establishing the character’s gender) (mum, obviously).
I still maintain that the problem is that the story is made for the 50s and should have been set in that time period. That would have meant removing a lot of the "modern" stuff, but that would have given them the opportunity to find new cold war stories going forward.. instead of the terrible storylines we have been given since Casino Royal. Daniel is very good, but the stories don't work.
Kermode is dead wrong. Casino Royale is blatantly set in 2006. Look at all the dates on the computers and mobile phones. Bond even says "2006" at one point.
The way blimey Charlie came out I believe mark was a very special fan of that particular scene for many unsettling reasons and probably watches it on repeat
around the 6 minute, when Mark says that Casino Royale is decidedly unspecific about what time it's set in....ummm, did this guy actually pay any attention to this film? It clearly says on the security tapes in the first hotel Bond stays in that it's set in July 2006.
This is one of the funniest reviews I’ve seen from these 2 so many funny likes but I definitely agree with Simon, Casino Royale (1967) is one of the worst movies I’ve ever seen.
@etocadet I guess the original author didn't know ANYTHING about James Bond when he wrote the book because all those criticisms apply to it. Don't blame the writers for trying to take Bond back to his roots after Die another Day destroyed the franchise and spat on Ian Fleming's vision and grave.
1. FRWL is actually one of the MORE faithful adaptations. Maybe he was thinking of Moonraker. 2. Although the specific time of which the film is set is not established we do know it takes place post 9/11. Judy Dench referrs to that event when talking to DC.
Pierce Brosnan was incapable of anything beyond posing like the male model he is. He'd be as out of water with dark and serious material as Roger Moore would've been.
@KingOfTheShrews Referring to anything as 'real cinema' immediately proves that you know far less about cinema than your smug superiority complex allows you to think.
Yeah, he didn't want to stop at Die Another Day, they were just planning on doing Casino Royale and they told Brosnan that he was too old to play Rookie Bond.
I have to say this is the only bond that actually could be passed off as a great individual film, which does of course mean it is a bit less classic bond unlike skyfall which sort of combined modern bond with the old bond but still felt a bit souless to me. So i have to say my top 3 bond films are "From Russia with Love" , Dr No and casino royale. eva green has to be the best bond girl character yet.
The Bond films could get away with that kind of Die Another Day mediocrity before Bourne came along. The Bourne films showed everyone that Bond films were simply outdated and the same kind of material could be done (and were being done) better elsewhere. Bourne had everything that the Daniel Craig Bond has: visceral fights, realistic guns and believable characters. They had to update the franchise in every way because of Bourne and succeeded spectacularly.
@PurushaDesa you're not the only one it didn't feel like a bond film, it was written/produced by americans who didn't get what a british spy is about. there was no fancy gadgets there was no state of the art car there was no super weapon to deal with, sure it was a pvt organisation but if uve played the metal gear games it combined both and worked brilliantly they described the vodka martini which annoyed me, i thought it had vodka and martini but no it had so much more both films failed
I didn't like Pierce because he seemed a tad, just a tad, reliant on the gadgets he obtained and the help he obtained from other people. Not because of the script, but his action sequences were always some muscular brute running at him and Pierce doing some "using my pinkie I will flip you around onto your head" and not a real meaty fight. Craig is much better in this regard and you honestly believe he could save the world with his bare hands whereas Pierce needed some help.
Lazenby was a perfectly fine Bond, Dalton and Moore were the worst actors, the Brosnan years were the stupidest plots and the Craig years are still stained by the mess that is Quantum of Solace
+Gjakova Shqipni True, the 67 version is one of the worst films I've ever seen. Horrible production, plot makes no sense, jokes aren't funny. Disaster of a film
Casino Royale was awful. Maybe I'm just out of love with Bond films, but it was. It was like one long, pretentious, arty car advert. And it was so hokey that in the final scene of the guy on the beach who Bond shoots in the knees, you can actually see the kneepads and squibs he's wearing! Bleh, so shoddy.
DIE ANOTHER DAY WAS TEH BEST BOND FILM EVER AND HIS INVISIBLE CAR WAS THE BEST GADGET HE EVER GOT AND IT IS REALISTIC BECAUSE THERE ARE REAL CARS LIKE THAT AROUND NOW AND MY DAD IS GETTING ONE FOR ME SO SHUT UR MOUTH KERMIT!!!!
This movie only gets better and better with every watch
110% agree! I have watched this film more times than any other. I absolutely love it!
@@heeeeeresrossy Agree. I've watched all the Bond films and this is such an amazing film. Mads Mikkelsen is such a great actor and the fact he plays the baddie who isn't a tough guy, he's just smart and has connections makes it quite believable. Daniel Craig wise, shame QoS sucked (the camera work made me feel car sick, the story, all so mixed up) but the rest were good, Skyfall and Spectre especially IMHO. Mark K is so correct in making a game (poker) which for someone like myself isn't particular interesting turn into psychological warfare is credit to the actors and director. The ONLY criticism I have of it, is I've spoke to people who didn't understand the early part where Le Chiffre 'shorts' the airline stocks with the money then attempts to blow up the prototype, it fails and he loses a tremendous amount of money thus leading to the poker tournament. I think unless you are familiar with trading that needed a tiny bit of additional explanation to the audience as to what 'shorting' is, why he did it and tried to blow up an airplane.
The love story worked very well for me, think they are being a bit unfair. Eva Green is a good actress.
Not just a bit unfair. I don’t think they know what they’re talking about.
Absolutely. Craig has been very transparent that Vesper Lynd is the ghost that haunted his entire series despite only having under one hour of screen time. She is completely integral to how they ended up carving his character and the overarching narrative. So a rare misjudgment from Kermode but I think one that he has since reexamined and changed his mind about.
You do know that this review is from 2006 right?, and Mark has since changed his view on this film, and now considers it a masterpiece
I really enjoy Kermode as a reviewer. He doesn't mind if his counterpart has a differing opinion, as well as not taking jabs seriously. It's always pleasant listening to him.
Kermode and Simon just bounce off each other so naturally. I can listen to them for hours. I love it when Mark gets playfully bullied into going to see a film he knows he is going to despise like any of the Michael Bay films or PoTC and Simon is like 'so! Open-minded review, what did you think Mark?' :D
Eva Green was great. A real thinking Bond girl, who was a sidekick and a technician as well as a a squeeze. Best one in years.
They've gone very downhill since. Some rando nameless chick riding a pony. Screwing a grieving women after her husband's funeral. Depressing stuff.
Casino Royale is so much better than Skyfall.
Skyfall is overrated
I agree
Skyfall is very contrived.
Skyfall has a far smoother pace though. And a better villain I think.
Silva's plan is silly but at least he does something. Le Chiffre is a Z list constantly reacting and in the ropes. He doesnt feel dangerous and unpredictable like Silva.
The only craig bond I liked was casino and its my 2nd favourite bond movie after goldfinger.
top 5 bond films
1- From Russia With Love
2- Casino Royale
3- GoldenEye
4- License to Kill (Super Underrated)
5- Goldfinger
A brilliant top 5. 👍
It's Licence.
Good choices
Such a good film
Best so far
Oliver Sixteen no
+KCRyder Yes.
LoN3wOlF5tudi0s
lol - It´s not even in the top 5
KCRyder Not even in the top 5 Bond movies?
I agree with Simon - the original Casino Royale was terrible.
Doesn't count. It's a spoof.
First class Bond movie.
Saturday night watching kermode and mayo with the headphones in while my wife watches a terrible film and my sons on the ipad. The joys of life.
25/11/17
Peace ✌️
From Russia with Love does tend to follow the book quite closely. The main change that I can think of is that Rosa Klebb and Kronsteen are not just working for SMERSH but secretly part of SPECTRE, but that doesn't really alter the plot significantly.
.
I know right!
Without a doubt its Daniel Craig's best bond movie. Now we know what's happened to him the guesses are going bonky.
"Kraft Dairylea on legs"
Watching in 2020. It's amazing how much Simon used to contribute to reviews (if he'd seen the film). These days he just sits silently for the most part. It's like he's lost his enthusiasm for this show.
And yes, this is still the best Daniel Craig bond movie. And yes, would still have been better without the last 20mins
Also watching in 2020... Lack of love for the acting of Mad Mikkelsen :-/
Yeh I kind of agree but it does occur in the book, except they made it into an action set piece in venice.
100% agree, 20 mins near end not needed.
Kernite doesn’t know what he’s talking about! The love interest was totally believable with Eva Green. Best of the Craig era. Did he have a better time believing it in Spectre and No time to die?
What’s amazing is you can easily watch Casino Royale again and again from start to finish. Can’t do the same with No time to die now I’ve seen it once. Shame really
I agree brother. It’s a masterpiece. I like Dr. Kermode but he’s wrong about this film.
timothy dalton was good
Timothy Dalton was a very good Bond. But he was trying to do the Daniel Craig Bond with Roger Moore scripts, full of glib quips and exploding milk-bottles. His gritty, ahead-of-its-time performance was sunk by camp surroundings.
The GQ suit shot at the end was my blimey Charlie moment! Ladies getting hot and bothered all over the cinema.
Casino Royale has effectively rendered the Pierce Brosnan Bond movies obsolete IMO
I do too! I geniunely think Brosnan is one of the best Bonds. Goldeneye is one of my very favourites. I like the way he blends humour with the cold toughness, which was kind of lost in DAD, but thats more the poor writing and OTT action that let that film down.
When I saw this there were some thoroughly annoying kids in the cinema- even "oh no"-ing when Bond was captured. Then Le Cheffre got his knotted rope out, and they clammed right up.
The scene that gets me the most as far as product placement goes, is when he goes to tie his shoe lace outside the Ocean View Hotel and you can see a Jaguar behind him in full view. It's so bad it looks like a poster advertising the car. In fact that whole car park sequence is like a car commercial. But I still consider this film to be one of the best in the series!
Good review, I agree about the last 20min. The movie had it's climax and the Italy part feels like an unnecessary extension. I like Casino Royal as much as I like Man on fire and Collateral. The violence is more realistic and less glorifying than in other movies.
The coda in Italy serves to show us Bond as he is going forward (to explain why his character is the way it is)
What about Peter Dinklage as Bond? Would that work?
You are absolutely right
You ARE the only person who misses Pierce Brosnan
Such an unfair review great film
Eve Greene a weak point of the film,don't agree with that at all,I'd say she is up there with the best there has been when it comes to bond girls
With respect to Mr. Craig's successful revitalisation of the character, I seem to be the only person left who misses Pierce Brosnan. Whatever animosity people have toward Die Another Day, the film is not his fault, and he was as charming as ever in the role. Why not blame Halle Berry or Purvis and Wade or the CGI crew for screwing up the franchise instead? They share far more of the responsibility. It's not like Pierce wanted DAD to be his swansong - he always wanted material as dark as Royale.
I have always wanted to hear the good doctor and mayo's thoughts on Casino Royale
I thought there was some really tense moments, and enjoyed it mostly
Oh man! I am SO SORRY!!!! I forgot this is the internet...where your opinion of something dictates your intelligence level. Please forgive me for not agreeing with you right away!
Good review, but I diagree with what Mark said about From russia with Love not being faithful to the book, its one of the few Bond movies that is faithful to the books.
The book goes quite deep into the love interest. It's a large part of the story...
This and Skyfall are the best of Bond
Brosnan - good bond in bad bond films. IMO
Like Capaldi in Doctor Who.
Daniel Craig coming out of the sea Made reach puberty again
How did Mayo think it was terrible? It's one of Daniel Craig's best
He was referring to the original
First, I admire the writers for bringing Bond back to more Fleming-esque roots (less gadgets, more intrigue) in CR.
Second, I disliked both DAD and QoS but for different reasons.
Third, I still prefer Pierce AS Bond (more sophisticated and stylish, and you actually believed he could have gone to Eton).
I don't care about the product placement. This is THE best Bond film for me.
I think ETA Swatch SA would not mind if you stood up and shouted Swatch, since they make Omegas
The film is A fresh reinvention of the 007 films as the film’s action packed, well acted, stylish, well directed, intense & thrilling. (88%) (4.5/5 stars) (positive)
THEN MAYBE YOU SHOULDN'T BE LIVING HEEEEERE
my favourite after goldfinger
Not in places not a film to see with your mother (said place being seeing Le Chiffre’s girlfriend on the balcony and asking very loudly establishing the character’s gender) (mum, obviously).
I still maintain that the problem is that the story is made for the 50s and should have been set in that time period. That would have meant removing a lot of the "modern" stuff, but that would have given them the opportunity to find new cold war stories going forward.. instead of the terrible storylines we have been given since Casino Royal. Daniel is very good, but the stories don't work.
Kermode is dead wrong. Casino Royale is blatantly set in 2006.
Look at all the dates on the computers and mobile phones. Bond even says "2006" at one point.
He is not an Idiot , it is his opinion , so respect it . Just like i think Roger Moore is the best and that is MY opinion !
The way blimey Charlie came out I believe mark was a very special fan of that particular scene for many unsettling reasons and probably watches it on repeat
Stand up and shout 'Timex!' Where is The Code here?
around the 6 minute, when Mark says that Casino Royale is decidedly unspecific about what time it's set in....ummm, did this guy actually pay any attention to this film? It clearly says on the security tapes in the first hotel Bond stays in that it's set in July 2006.
I loved Pierce Brosnan. He seems like "the" Bond to me. That said, Daniel Craig is my favorite Bond of all time. Can't wait for Skyfall!
Hope you enjoyed it
This is one of the funniest reviews I’ve seen from these 2 so many funny likes but I definitely agree with Simon, Casino Royale (1967) is one of the worst movies I’ve ever seen.
......LIVING HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!
@etocadet I guess the original author didn't know ANYTHING about James Bond when he wrote the book because all those criticisms apply to it. Don't blame the writers for trying to take Bond back to his roots after Die another Day destroyed the franchise and spat on Ian Fleming's vision and grave.
1. FRWL is actually one of the MORE faithful adaptations. Maybe he was thinking of Moonraker.
2. Although the specific time of which the film is set is not established we do know it takes place post 9/11. Judy Dench referrs to that event when talking to DC.
Pierce Brosnan was incapable of anything beyond posing like the male model he is. He'd be as out of water with dark and serious material as Roger Moore would've been.
@KingOfTheShrews Referring to anything as 'real cinema' immediately proves that you know far less about cinema than your smug superiority complex allows you to think.
Yeah, he didn't want to stop at Die Another Day, they were just planning on doing Casino Royale and they told Brosnan that he was too old to play Rookie Bond.
...as well as the plot being Very Much About funding Terrorism in a post-9/11 world. Bad point in an otherwise good review.
Still the best Daniel Craig Bond film.
I think he said "except for" or with the "exception of" From Russia With Love, or at least that was the intention.
I didn't like the love story twists at the end either, unnecessary.
when that watch scene came up I just shouted shouted "KA-CHING"
Good film though
:)
Kermode is a good reviewer but knows about the Bond books. From Russia With Love is quite similar to the original novel.
I think he meant The Spy Who Loved Me.
product placement my ass!!!
@PurushaDesa You're not. I do a bit too. Oh well.
@enigma19833 can't tell if trolling or just .. delusional..
Pierce can't handle the dark stuff due to his "prettyboy image".
@ec123456789able Sean Connery, surely?
yes they do go back lol
HA! Now here comes the absent mindedness!
I have to say this is the only bond that actually could be passed off as a great individual film, which does of course mean it is a bit less classic bond unlike skyfall which sort of combined modern bond with the old bond but still felt a bit souless to me. So i have to say my top 3 bond films are "From Russia with Love" , Dr No and casino royale. eva green has to be the best bond girl character yet.
The Bond films could get away with that kind of Die Another Day mediocrity before Bourne came along. The Bourne films showed everyone that Bond films were simply outdated and the same kind of material could be done (and were being done) better elsewhere. Bourne had everything that the Daniel Craig Bond has: visceral fights, realistic guns and believable characters. They had to update the franchise in every way because of Bourne and succeeded spectacularly.
Absolutely the best
Docs spot on on this
Pierce Brosnan was the worst Bond by far (and yes, I am including George Lazenby).
He was good in Taffin though.
STEPHEN!
Mayo is so correct on the 1973 Casino Royale film
1967
@@treadstone1970 and I am so incorrect
@@perry0547 easy to make a mistake. It's terrible.
@@treadstone1970 hands down one of the worst films I have ever seen, and I've seen so many I cannot even remember their release dates anymore.
@PurushaDesa you're not the only one it didn't feel like a bond film, it was written/produced by americans who didn't get what a british spy is about.
there was no fancy gadgets
there was no state of the art car
there was no super weapon to deal with, sure it was a pvt organisation but if uve played the metal gear games it combined both and worked brilliantly
they described the vodka martini which annoyed me, i thought it had vodka and martini but no it had so much more
both films failed
I didn't like Pierce because he seemed a tad, just a tad, reliant on the gadgets he obtained and the help he obtained from other people. Not because of the script, but his action sequences were always some muscular brute running at him and Pierce doing some "using my pinkie I will flip you around onto your head" and not a real meaty fight. Craig is much better in this regard and you honestly believe he could save the world with his bare hands whereas Pierce needed some help.
Lazenby was a perfectly fine Bond, Dalton and Moore were the worst actors, the Brosnan years were the stupidest plots and the Craig years are still stained by the mess that is Quantum of Solace
@beanieboy91 Well I'm mad. Give me the debonair Pierce over the brutish Craig anyday - no disrespect to Craig.
Sorry very average film, it tries too hard to impress when its a rip off of the Bourne movies, sorry it's not good.
Could never understand why people raved about this film. Not a bad film but i was just bored through most of it.
Casino Royale terrible? Wow... 100% wrong.
+LoN3wOlF5tudi0s
He meant the 1967 version, which is indeed terrible.
+Gjakova Shqipni True, the 67 version is one of the worst films I've ever seen. Horrible production, plot makes no sense, jokes aren't funny. Disaster of a film
Casino Royale was awful. Maybe I'm just out of love with Bond films, but it was. It was like one long, pretentious, arty car advert. And it was so hokey that in the final scene of the guy on the beach who Bond shoots in the knees, you can actually see the kneepads and squibs he's wearing! Bleh, so shoddy.
Casino Royale was pure drivel.
It also had a ludicrous poker game.
I wish people would stop paying to watch this shit.
DIE ANOTHER DAY WAS TEH BEST BOND FILM EVER AND HIS INVISIBLE CAR WAS THE BEST GADGET HE EVER GOT AND IT IS REALISTIC BECAUSE THERE ARE REAL CARS LIKE THAT AROUND NOW AND MY DAD IS GETTING ONE FOR ME SO SHUT UR MOUTH KERMIT!!!!
boring movie about cards
First Time watching- Rubbish
Second- Worst bond movie ever
Third- (i actually paid attention) BRILLIANT!
Judi Dench definitely should not have being in the Craig Bonds.