Finally commonsense prevails! This was a complete football accident and the tribunal dealt with this case the only way it could. The whole media beat-up of this case was shameful. I’m positive if it hadn’t been a Collingwood player involved, we wouldn’t have heard a thing from them. TRUE JUSTICE TONIGHT!!
Accident or not, a suspension should always occur for a head knock that results in player rendering unconscious. I truly hope the afl send it to the appeal board and his season is over!
5 years too late to be going off like this both about player welfare and his brothers well being. If he really cared he could've decried willie rioli every time he spun in the air and flew into peoples heads ass first and claimed to be competing for the ball or he could've said liam ryans shot on maynards ribs in the gf was not on, could've even said something when gaf broke his brothers' jaw but it's okay because it's his team doing it. be quiet Hamish and don't talk about player welfare or integrity now that it's beneficial for you.
Brayshaw waltzed out of the middle like he was taking a kick in and kicked the ball like no one was in front of him. If you leave yourself that vulnerable by kicking the ball late, what do you expect to happen? Even if he didn't hit him in the head or put his arms out or whatever irrational emotionally driven alternative is suggested, the fact remains Brayshaw lacked awareness. He should've been prepared for contact (he's a professional AFL player...) and the fact that he wasn't is contributary negligence to him being knocked out. All the sooking is embarrassing
You’re so right, Nick Blakey should have been aware that his head was gonna get hit by jack Martin, he lacked awareness. Andy Brayshaw should have been aware that he was gonna get king hit by Andrew gaff, his fault for not being aware. Brent staker should have been aware that Barry hall would punch him in the jaw, not Barry’s fault, Brent should have been more aware because he’s an afl player. How dare Angus Brayshaw win the contest and run out the centre and take his time to think about the best kick possible for a goal, he was just asking to get tackled, that’s all his fault. Good thing we have blokes like you, proper common sense. You should be in charge of the MRC.
Classic "blame the victim" mentality -- if you can make that argument about Brayshaw, you can make EXACTLY the same argument about Maynard -- he should have been aware that contact was going to happen and therefore should have avoided it -- find something else to talk about, you've got no clue obviously
"We are not at all satisfied that a reasonable player would have foreseen that violent impact, or impact of the type suffered by Brayshaw, was inevitable, or even likely," Gleeson Nice one Steve. No clue obviously 🤣@@steve-3140
Hahahaha i guess that's why the Bruz got off ey? Why are you referring to 3 striking incidents as precedent (2 of which were just dog acts off the ball) when it was a rough conduct charge? Go read a tort book 🤣@@nickcraven9379
"Brayshaw could’ve executed his kick in a different direction or in a different manner, landed in a different manner or in a slightly different location" Gleeson @@nickcraven9379
If he had time to turn his body away and drop his shoulder he had time to put his hands out. They were already above his head!! Absolute joke of an outcome from the tribunal.
If you remove Collingwood and Melbourne fans from the debate. I think most agree that Maynard should be punished. The same way any other player is punished when leaving the grounds and hitting an opponent in the face side on. Even if unintentional
then neither should 75% of the suspensions this year, get inline with everyone else's rules, your not special. Well in a sense, ya deffs touched.@@_LeeTurner
No he said what an emotionally affected bias person would say. That’s why his public carry on the last few days has been ordinary and unprofessional. Should’ve removed himself from commenting publicly on the matter until an outcome was made. He’s well within his rights to be emotional about it but shouldn’t have used his platform to run his mouth.
Hamish - you’re wrong
Hamish probably wouldn’t even care if it wasn’t his brother. Footy accidents happen and this was one
Finally commonsense prevails! This was a complete football accident and the tribunal dealt with this case the only way it could. The whole media beat-up of this case was shameful. I’m positive if it hadn’t been a Collingwood player involved, we wouldn’t have heard a thing from them. TRUE JUSTICE TONIGHT!!
Accident or not, a suspension should always occur for a head knock that results in player rendering unconscious. I truly hope the afl send it to the appeal board and his season is over!
Hammer is wrong on this. He shouldn’t even be at the tribunal.
You're not considering any class actions of the AFL if you think this doesn't even deserve to be seen by the tribunal.
Never listening to this podcast again. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but Brayshaws are biased, irrational, unbearable & hsyterical to listen to.
Jog on
5 years too late to be going off like this both about player welfare and his brothers well being. If he really cared he could've decried willie rioli every time he spun in the air and flew into peoples heads ass first and claimed to be competing for the ball or he could've said liam ryans shot on maynards ribs in the gf was not on, could've even said something when gaf broke his brothers' jaw but it's okay because it's his team doing it.
be quiet Hamish and don't talk about player welfare or integrity now that it's beneficial for you.
Hammer sorry mate bad take it was a footy accident definitely not on purpose
Does not on purpose mean shouldn't be suspended or.....
@@BackChat yeah shouldn’t be suspended there was nothing in it sorry about Gus but that’s footy
@@Buntabunta937if you hit someone in the head you’re getting done.
@@SuperDecdog why didn’t the Geelong player get suspended when knock his own team mate out?
@@Buntabunta937in what universe is this a logically comeback.
Brayshaw waltzed out of the middle like he was taking a kick in and kicked the ball like no one was in front of him. If you leave yourself that vulnerable by kicking the ball late, what do you expect to happen? Even if he didn't hit him in the head or put his arms out or whatever irrational emotionally driven alternative is suggested, the fact remains Brayshaw lacked awareness. He should've been prepared for contact (he's a professional AFL player...) and the fact that he wasn't is contributary negligence to him being knocked out. All the sooking is embarrassing
You’re so right, Nick Blakey should have been aware that his head was gonna get hit by jack Martin, he lacked awareness. Andy Brayshaw should have been aware that he was gonna get king hit by Andrew gaff, his fault for not being aware. Brent staker should have been aware that Barry hall would punch him in the jaw, not Barry’s fault, Brent should have been more aware because he’s an afl player. How dare Angus Brayshaw win the contest and run out the centre and take his time to think about the best kick possible for a goal, he was just asking to get tackled, that’s all his fault. Good thing we have blokes like you, proper common sense. You should be in charge of the MRC.
Classic "blame the victim" mentality -- if you can make that argument about Brayshaw, you can make EXACTLY the same argument about Maynard -- he should have been aware that contact was going to happen and therefore should have avoided it -- find something else to talk about, you've got no clue obviously
"We are not at all satisfied that a reasonable player would have foreseen that violent impact, or impact of the type suffered by Brayshaw, was inevitable, or even likely," Gleeson
Nice one Steve. No clue obviously 🤣@@steve-3140
Hahahaha i guess that's why the Bruz got off ey? Why are you referring to 3 striking incidents as precedent (2 of which were just dog acts off the ball) when it was a rough conduct charge? Go read a tort book 🤣@@nickcraven9379
"Brayshaw could’ve executed his kick in a different direction or in a different manner, landed in a different manner or in a slightly different location" Gleeson
@@nickcraven9379
If Hamish is the one commenting when his brothers get knocked, who’s the one that comments when Hamish himself gets knocked?
Hahaha free to play suckerrrsss
There's no way Maynard had time to avoid the impact. You're kidding yourself if you think he had that much time to think about it mid air.
Hamish has played footy. Might have a good idea.
Also deciding if you can avoid someone or not isn’t part of the tribunal
@@BackChat his also biased his talking about his brother.
If he had time to turn his body away and drop his shoulder he had time to put his hands out. They were already above his head!! Absolute joke of an outcome from the tribunal.
@@jasond3918 I hope the afl appeal
Hammer, congrats on your Sandover Medal 🏅
Thanks legend
Geez the Brayshaws,and the Melbourne footy club, did a fair amount of moaning about this collision..
If you remove Collingwood and Melbourne fans from the debate. I think most agree that Maynard should be punished. The same way any other player is punished when leaving the grounds and hitting an opponent in the face side on. Even if unintentional
Speak for yourself and only yourself.
You can speak for me
Speak for yourself,support neither and he should be allowed to play
Rubbish. He shouldn’t be suspended. He shouldn’t even be at the tribunal.
then neither should 75% of the suspensions this year, get inline with everyone else's rules, your not special. Well in a sense, ya deffs touched.@@_LeeTurner
Man said exactly what non vic fans are all thinking. Absolute legend hammer
No he said what an emotionally affected bias person would say. That’s why his public carry on the last few days has been ordinary and unprofessional. Should’ve removed himself from commenting publicly on the matter until an outcome was made. He’s well within his rights to be emotional about it but shouldn’t have used his platform to run his mouth.
@@craigdawes3569 you sound like one of the typical flogs he’s calling out mate. Back in ya box
@@craigdawes3569i agree. I go for the lions and this carry on is stupid
@@justintilbrook8691by the way you can’t have a civilized and logical conversation I feel like you described yourself and not me.
Hamish 👏👏👏
YESSIR