Pisco’s bad take on God-King Trump w/ Lawyer Ryan Mullally

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.พ. 2025
  • Originally Aired August 11, 2024 with @RyanCMullally on Twitter
    Like & Subscribe. Click here to watch the last video Tim Walz and Stolen Valor Veterans Panel | WhickTV: • Video
    Support & Donations:
    Patreon - / counterpoints
    Donations - streamelements...
    ____________________________________________________
    Editor: ‪@leftisbestpolitics‬
    Socials:
    Website - www.counterpoi...
    Discord - / discord
    Reddit - / counterpoints
    Twitter - / _counterpoints_
    Twitch - / counterpoints
    Political Channel - / @counterpoints7537
    Debate Channel - / @counterfireaway
    Media Review Channel - / @counterreviews9065
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    #lawyer #interview #debate #scotus #trump #facts #debate #destiny #president #godking #biden #election2024 #politics #counterpoints #counterfire

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @counterfireaway
    @counterfireaway  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Like & Subscribe. Click here to watch the last video Tim Walz and Stolen Valor Veterans Panel | WhickTV: th-cam.com/video/llLWxdflOa8/w-d-xo.html

    • @jameshattan6187
      @jameshattan6187 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @counterfire while the president may not be able to order a kill by doj or FBI what about that same argument with CIA which technically can't handle what would be presumed as domestic terrorists don't the CIA already have a history of carrying out overseas assassination and also have proxy groups they could use in this case plus getting caught illegally operating in country like with operation mockingbird not to go to crazy but wouldn't all of these factor in plus isn't it vagueness of law at which our government historically used to try cases and justify doing horrible things anyway all of this to be considered that could make the presidential office seem like the potential God king argument

    • @TheWiggum123
      @TheWiggum123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jameshattan6187your asking a hypothetical on top of a hypothetical, my feeling of how it’s implied in the court case, would be that would not meet the criteria of immunity because you have to seperate out each act engaged by the different groups/organisations.
      Trump’s attorney when pushed on the question admitted that the slate of fraudulent electors would be a personal act, because he is engaging with people outside the role of president. I think in this case because the CIA on the order of the president is acting outside of the role of presidents, it would be constituted as the same as if he himself had hired those people too.
      Ultimately I don’t think there is anyway you could pull this argument off to a court, we would have to believe they are brain dead to acknowledge it as legitimate. The court in the hearing gave massive pushback about the immunities in vastly less convoluted ways to circumvent the law.

  • @brendaoreilly
    @brendaoreilly 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Too bad this dudes mic was this bad but good convo