Hi, I found your channel because I was looking for a Patron review. I notice you said "the game release a few hours ago" so I skipped it. I then saw this video and you say the same thing. I also stopped watching here because I'm thinking "how can you give a reliable review based on a few hours". It is not to be negative, just a feedback. Maybe you can get more views if your wait a little and use more time on the review.
You come across respectfully and I appreciate that. When you've been playing video games for as long and as often as I have, you don't NEED to review a game all the way through. For almost all games you can tell what you're getting into within the first hour. And with steams refund policy, most people become amateur reviewers (like me) as they play because they don't know if they wanna spend the money on that game. I can do this because I have been a huge gamer since I was 8. That's over 2 decades. I've seen em all, I've played the best and the worst. I've been right on my channel far often then i've been wrong. And you're free to not agree or to pass. I've stated before that i'm not some well educated trained professional reviewer. I'm just a regular guy/girl like you guys out there and i'm giving my opinion. I never lie and I give you footage along with my words to help you come to your own decision. Am I always right? no of course not. But previously my record is more times I've been right about a game than wrong but a lot. You can choose to trust that, or not. It's up to you. I'm just trying to help. Thanks for your comment and I hope you'll give me another chance :)
@@miah_the_king honestly, i think u should keep doing what youre doing- i prefer these short, fast reviews to see if its worth playing a game or not, and not every game needs in depth reviewing.
Climate change, Climate change, Climate change. Feel that annoyance? it's because many do not want their gaming polluted with unrelated issues. you can't unsee them. another example, King's dilemma came with a "trigger warning". i laughed, but was still blindsided by the politics in character creation. Flooded, you handled it well, but many game designers do not. i don't consider myself sensitive, more critical of agendas, like trying to find products without lemon flavoring added. maybe i don't want lemon in everything. i'll compare it to the violence tag added to video games, which is the point of reviews. while it's in your best interests to avoid these complications, it's not serving your viewers to avoid them. i'm not finding fault with your reviews at all, mentioning a missing "disable motion blur" button. stuff you can't unsee. you're doing nothing wrong, just suggesting a tool for your reviews. i'm still auditing your channel, thank you for respecting my time, and money.
I personally don't think politics should be included in video games. I refuse to take sides or to say anything that may or may not indicate any political agenda I may or may not have. Cuz it's not necessary. Honestly I didn't even think about climate change once while I was playing this because politics are furthest from my mind when i'm playing video games. It's not that I avoid it, I just think it's unecessary especially when trying to review a game. And sure, I may miss a crucial detail at times when reviewing. I'm not perfect. I'm just a normal person like you and everyone else. Thanks for your comment, it was very respectful and appreciated. I just hope through this you may come to understand me just a bit more. I hope to see you at future content. :)
@@miah_the_king "I just think it's unnecessary especially when trying to review a game." is not serving your viewers that's why i used the lemon analogy, pre purchase discernment. and "motion blur" disabling being something some want to have available. (wish i could think of the review that made that point) maybe i could have posted this under your "i am your president" video as i think your opinion would be different. that video showed me it didn't take itself too serious when the Aides left the office, cardboard cutouts.🤣 sorry i wasn't clear, akin to walking across the yard "watch your step, we have dogs". peace
The annoying thing is when entertainment presents unreality as being reality. It throws you out of the story. While the climate is certainly changing, the "the world is going to end in 10 years from carbon emissions" thing is fake. Knowing that makes games that include it less fun. It's like with the recent Disney movies that have tanked because the story and characters aren't enjoyable when the lead female is always a girlboss perfect in every way. When the characters don't resemble actual human beings in the real world, it became difficult to find the story engaging. Similarly, as an older guy who has been through decades of climate catastrophe always being just around the corner but never ever happening, it's difficult for me to engage in a game that uses rising sea levels as a primary plot point. The fact that the answer ends up being some other mystery in the end doesn't change anything because the only reason it would be surprising is if you took the threat of rising sea levels seriously. So to get the nice benefit that it has a mystery ending, you first have to pretend that rising sea levels are already anything that we should be concerned about. And yes I know many of you reading this are millennials or Gen Z and you grew up being taught that only idiots deny climate change and drastic action is going to be required to save humanity, and you're going to get triggered. Well, I'm sorry you got propagandized with false information and you're too emotionally fragile to question your base assumptions and too socially vulnerable to risk independent thought but welcome to the club. My generation grew up with impending war with the Soviet Union being the thing we oriented our lives around and then had to accept was being used to manipulate us and was never a real possibility. So I know how you feel.
great review !
Thank you!
But is it good?
Releases on Nintendo Switch in a few days
Hi, I found your channel because I was looking for a Patron review. I notice you said "the game release a few hours ago" so I skipped it. I then saw this video and you say the same thing. I also stopped watching here because I'm thinking "how can you give a reliable review based on a few hours". It is not to be negative, just a feedback. Maybe you can get more views if your wait a little and use more time on the review.
You come across respectfully and I appreciate that.
When you've been playing video games for as long and as often as I have, you don't NEED to review a game all the way through. For almost all games you can tell what you're getting into within the first hour.
And with steams refund policy, most people become amateur reviewers (like me) as they play because they don't know if they wanna spend the money on that game.
I can do this because I have been a huge gamer since I was 8. That's over 2 decades. I've seen em all, I've played the best and the worst. I've been right on my channel far often then i've been wrong. And you're free to not agree or to pass. I've stated before that i'm not some well educated trained professional reviewer. I'm just a regular guy/girl like you guys out there and i'm giving my opinion. I never lie and I give you footage along with my words to help you come to your own decision. Am I always right? no of course not. But previously my record is more times I've been right about a game than wrong but a lot. You can choose to trust that, or not. It's up to you. I'm just trying to help.
Thanks for your comment and I hope you'll give me another chance :)
@@miah_the_king honestly, i think u should keep doing what youre doing- i prefer these short, fast reviews to see if its worth playing a game or not, and not every game needs in depth reviewing.
First comment yeah!
lol awesome! Congrats! :D
You should have been more prepared.
k
Climate change, Climate change, Climate change.
Feel that annoyance? it's because many do not want their gaming polluted with unrelated issues. you can't unsee them.
another example, King's dilemma came with a "trigger warning". i laughed, but was still blindsided by the politics in character creation.
Flooded, you handled it well, but many game designers do not. i don't consider myself sensitive, more critical of agendas, like trying to find products without lemon flavoring added. maybe i don't want lemon in everything.
i'll compare it to the violence tag added to video games, which is the point of reviews.
while it's in your best interests to avoid these complications, it's not serving your viewers to avoid them. i'm not finding fault with your reviews at all, mentioning a missing "disable motion blur" button. stuff you can't unsee.
you're doing nothing wrong, just suggesting a tool for your reviews. i'm still auditing your channel, thank you for respecting my time, and money.
I personally don't think politics should be included in video games. I refuse to take sides or to say anything that may or may not indicate any political agenda I may or may not have. Cuz it's not necessary. Honestly I didn't even think about climate change once while I was playing this because politics are furthest from my mind when i'm playing video games. It's not that I avoid it, I just think it's unecessary especially when trying to review a game. And sure, I may miss a crucial detail at times when reviewing. I'm not perfect. I'm just a normal person like you and everyone else. Thanks for your comment, it was very respectful and appreciated. I just hope through this you may come to understand me just a bit more. I hope to see you at future content. :)
@@miah_the_king "I just think it's unnecessary especially when trying to review a game." is not serving your viewers
that's why i used the lemon analogy, pre purchase discernment. and "motion blur" disabling being something some want to have available. (wish i could think of the review that made that point)
maybe i could have posted this under your "i am your president" video as i think your opinion would be different. that video showed me it didn't take itself too serious when the Aides left the office, cardboard cutouts.🤣
sorry i wasn't clear, akin to walking across the yard "watch your step, we have dogs". peace
The annoying thing is when entertainment presents unreality as being reality. It throws you out of the story. While the climate is certainly changing, the "the world is going to end in 10 years from carbon emissions" thing is fake. Knowing that makes games that include it less fun. It's like with the recent Disney movies that have tanked because the story and characters aren't enjoyable when the lead female is always a girlboss perfect in every way. When the characters don't resemble actual human beings in the real world, it became difficult to find the story engaging. Similarly, as an older guy who has been through decades of climate catastrophe always being just around the corner but never ever happening, it's difficult for me to engage in a game that uses rising sea levels as a primary plot point. The fact that the answer ends up being some other mystery in the end doesn't change anything because the only reason it would be surprising is if you took the threat of rising sea levels seriously. So to get the nice benefit that it has a mystery ending, you first have to pretend that rising sea levels are already anything that we should be concerned about.
And yes I know many of you reading this are millennials or Gen Z and you grew up being taught that only idiots deny climate change and drastic action is going to be required to save humanity, and you're going to get triggered. Well, I'm sorry you got propagandized with false information and you're too emotionally fragile to question your base assumptions and too socially vulnerable to risk independent thought but welcome to the club. My generation grew up with impending war with the Soviet Union being the thing we oriented our lives around and then had to accept was being used to manipulate us and was never a real possibility. So I know how you feel.
@@patrickbarnes9874 And breathe.... 😆