FF12, can't miss out on that in this conversation. One of the best looking games on the PS2. They could have spruced up the res to 720p and cleaned up the aliasing and release it on the PS3 and it'd still be called one of the best looking games. Lots of early JRPGs on the PS3 looked similar to FF12
@@lechistanskiswit320 COULD YOU SHUT UP PS2 LOVER, GO BACK TO CAVE PLAY YOUR PS2, if you love ps2 and your pathetic ps2 and vintage stuff go back to Your Cave!!! You know nothing about graphics, Resident Evil 4 on ps2 Look absolutely horrible, the ganado are literally like a Minecraft blurred squared character, there's absolutely nothing on ps2 that looks even close to Ps3 not even Black, PS3 is the Biggest Jump or Leap in Graphics Ever all will Forever Be due to much facts including the fact that Ps3 already Touch Reality Level of Emulation of Real Life Pictures Meaning That Much People Would Consider what they on Ps3 as Close to a Movie or Real Life before any other console, and what Ps4 and Ps5 did does Absolutely Not give a graphical leap because Ps3 Hardware Arive in a Time where Computing advanced so much that the Gpus could simulate Real life like Videos like that, the PS3 has The Biggest Leap in Performance from all Playstations and probably all Consoles, PS3 Cell is 40x faster than PS2 Cpu E.E of 6 Gflops, and PS3 Rsx Gpu G70 is about the same, Rsx G70 does 192 Gflops and had 302 millions of Transistors while ps2 Gpu had 50 millions of Transistors but flops are unknown that if it's Gpu is capable of doing flops calculation, anyways, Cell does 230 Gflops on 32 Bits Fp, Emotion Engine 6 Gflops, 6 x 40: 240, or 6 x 38: 228, so Cell was 38 times More Powerful than Emotion Engine, nearly 40 times faster, Cell could be pushed to 4Ghz clock and that Gives 256 Gflops just from the 8 SPES and 288 Gflops with 8 SPES and The 1 Ppe Core from Cell or as Available on Ps3 7 SPES + 1 Ppe at 4ghz: 256 Gflops, so at 4ghz Cell was 48 times faster than Emotion Engine, 6 vs 288, Cell was Said to be able to run at 6Ghz ON IBM Labs and the Team who Develop it, if you ask why not was not running at 6ghz on Ps3, then theres very simple answers to that, at 6ghz Cell would consume nearly twice the Energy Power and would need Twice the Size of Heatsink so for Sony it wold be better if Ps3 was as its cause at 3.2ghz Cell Ps3 end up already too much expensive!! PS3 Cok-001 mainboard already consumes 210 watts but yea the original power supply has a power level of 382 Watts which may prove that that Super powerful psu may be made with a Higher Clock Cell in made, it's True that Ps3 Rsx Gpu was aimed to run at 550mhz and have an downclock of 9% in launch 2006 to 500mhz, but it's nothing compared to what the psu could deliver, the Rsx on Ps3 90nm original consumes about nearly 100 watts so even 10% more on Gpu clock would be only 10 watts More and Ps3 would consume from standard 2006 with 500mhz 210 to Planned before 2006 220 watts and still 160 watts of Psu left to No US at all, this highly suggest that it was indeed to an higher clock Cell BroadBand Engine Cpu, if Cell where Clock at 4ghz which would be 25% more it would consume from 100 watts original 3.2ghz to 125 watts on 4ghz which still would have a Hugh power left on the Power Supply or Psu, 25 watts more is nothing compared to the 160 watts left on the Psu, would left 135 watts left gape.
@@lechistanskiswit320 @lechistanskiswit320 COULD YOU SHUT UP PS2 LOVER, GO BACK TO CAVE PLAY YOUR PS2, if you love ps2 and your pathetic ps2 and vintage stuff go back to Your Cave!!! You know nothing about graphics, Resident Evil 4 on ps2 Look absolutely horrible, the ganado are literally like a Minecraft blurred squared character, there's absolutely nothing on ps2 that looks even close to Ps3 not even Black, PS3 is the Biggest Jump or Leap in Graphics Ever all will Forever Be due to much facts including the fact that Ps3 already Touch Reality Level of Emulation of Real Life Pictures Meaning That Much People Would Consider what they on Ps3 as Close to a Movie or Real Life before any other console, and what Ps4 and Ps5 did does Absolutely Not give a graphical leap because Ps3 Hardware Arive in a Time where Computing advanced so much that the Gpus could simulate Real life like Videos like that, the PS3 has The Biggest Leap in Performance from all Playstations and probably all Consoles, PS3 Cell is 40x faster than PS2 Cpu E.E of 6 Gflops, and PS3 Rsx Gpu G70 is about the same, Rsx G70 does 192 Gflops and had 302 millions of Transistors while ps2 Gpu had 50 millions of Transistors but flops are unknown that if it's Gpu is capable of doing flops calculation, anyways, Cell does 230 Gflops on 32 Bits Fp, Emotion Engine 6 Gflops, 6 x 40: 240, or 6 x 38: 228, so Cell was 38 times More Powerful than Emotion Engine, nearly 40 times faster, Cell could be pushed to 4Ghz clock and that Gives 256 Gflops just from the 8 SPES and 288 Gflops with 8 SPES and The 1 Ppe Core from Cell or as Available on Ps3 7 SPES + 1 Ppe at 4ghz: 256 Gflops, so at 4ghz Cell was 48 times faster than Emotion Engine, 6 vs 288, Cell was Said to be able to run at 6Ghz ON IBM Labs and the Team who Develop it, if you ask why not was not running at 6ghz on Ps3, then theres very simple answers to that, at 6ghz Cell would consume nearly twice the Energy Power and would need Twice the Size of Heatsink so for Sony it wold be better if Ps3 was as its cause at 3.2ghz Cell Ps3 end up already too much expensive!! PS3 Cok-001 mainboard already consumes 210 watts but yea the original power supply has a power level of 382 Watts which may prove that that Super powerful psu may be made with a Higher Clock Cell in made, it's True that Ps3 Rsx Gpu was aimed to run at 550mhz and have an downclock of 9% in launch 2006 to 500mhz, but it's nothing compared to what the psu could deliver, the Rsx on Ps3 90nm original consumes about nearly 100 watts so even 10% more on Gpu clock would be only 10 watts More and Ps3 would consume from standard 2006 with 500mhz 210 to Planned before 2006 220 watts and still 160 watts of Psu left to No US at all, this highly suggest that it was indeed to an higher clock Cell BroadBand Engine Cpu, if Cell where Clock at 4ghz which would be 25% more it would consume from 100 watts original 3.2ghz to 125 watts on 4ghz which still would have a Hugh power left on the Power Supply or Psu, 25 watts more is nothing compared to the 160 watts left on the Psu, would left 135 watts left gape.
@@lechistanskiswit320 @lechistanskiswit320 COULD YOU SHUT UP PS2 LOVER, GO BACK TO CAVE PLAY YOUR PS2, if you love ps2 and your pathetic ps2 and vintage stuff go back to Your Cave!!! You know nothing about graphics, Resident Evil 4 on ps2 Look absolutely horrible, the ganado are literally like a Minecraft blurred squared character, there's absolutely nothing on ps2 that looks even close to Ps3 not even Black, PS3 is the Biggest Jump or Leap in Graphics Ever all will Forever Be due to much facts including the fact that Ps3 already Touch Reality Level of Emulation of Real Life Pictures Meaning That Much People Would Consider what they on Ps3 as Close to a Movie or Real Life before any other console, and what Ps4 and Ps5 did does Absolutely Not give a graphical leap because Ps3 Hardware Arive in a Time where Computing advanced so much that the Gpus could simulate Real life like Videos like that, the PS3 has The Biggest Leap in Performance from all Playstations and probably all Consoles, PS3 Cell is 40x faster than PS2 Cpu E.E of 6 Gflops, and PS3 Rsx Gpu G70 is about the same, Rsx G70 does 192 Gflops and had 302 millions of Transistors while ps2 Gpu had 50 millions of Transistors but flops are unknown that if it's Gpu is capable of doing flops calculation, anyways, Cell does 230 Gflops on 32 Bits Fp, Emotion Engine 6 Gflops, 6 x 40: 240, or 6 x 38: 228, so Cell was 38 times More Powerful than Emotion Engine, nearly 40 times faster, Cell could be pushed to 4Ghz clock and that Gives 256 Gflops just from the 8 SPES and 288 Gflops with 8 SPES and The 1 Ppe Core from Cell or as Available on Ps3 7 SPES + 1 Ppe at 4ghz: 256 Gflops, so at 4ghz Cell was 48 times faster than Emotion Engine, 6 vs 288, Cell was Said to be able to run at 6Ghz ON IBM Labs and the Team who Develop it, if you ask why not was not running at 6ghz on Ps3, then theres very simple answers to that, at 6ghz Cell would consume nearly twice the Energy Power and would need Twice the Size of Heatsink so for Sony it wold be better if Ps3 was as its cause at 3.2ghz Cell Ps3 end up already too much expensive!! PS3 Cok-001 mainboard already consumes 210 watts but yea the original power supply has a power level of 382 Watts which may prove that that Super powerful psu may be made with a Higher Clock Cell in made, it's True that Ps3 Rsx Gpu was aimed to run at 550mhz and have an downclock of 9% in launch 2006 to 500mhz, but it's nothing compared to what the psu could deliver, the Rsx on Ps3 90nm original consumes about nearly 100 watts so even 10% more on Gpu clock would be only 10 watts More and Ps3 would consume from standard 2006 with 500mhz 210 to Planned before 2006 220 watts and still 160 watts of Psu left to No US at all, this highly suggest that it was indeed to an higher clock Cell BroadBand Engine Cpu, if Cell where Clock at 4ghz which would be 25% more it would consume from 100 watts original 3.2ghz to 125 watts on 4ghz which still would have a Hugh power left on the Power Supply or Psu, 25 watts more is nothing compared to the 160 watts left on the Psu, would left 135 watts left gape.
One of the differences between PS2 & PS3 is the traffic cars during the race event or pursuit event. In PS2, there are no traffic cars once the race/pursuit events start, making it impossible to do dynamic pursuit breaker.
I played the PS2 version back in ‘06. A few years ago I bought the 360 version of this game. Holy cow was there a big jump! I was so thrown off! Not to mention the PS3/360 has the review mirror and cut scenes that were never in the PS2 version/the ones here in the video. It was like playing a whole ass new game!
Honestly, the only noticable differences I see here are the lighting and resolution. Things are a lot shinier and sharper on the PS3 than on PS2, and that's really it. Aside from those, you could tell me the PS2 version was the PS3 version and I'd believe you!
@@JDotLocNo, it was made originally for the seventh gen consoles. There are many unused cars in the sixth gen consoles that you can only obtain in the other newer versions. Also the engine in both gens is the same from MW 2005 on Xbox 360, you can notice it for effects such the NO2 trails. It is incredible that this game runs on consoles like the PS2.
@@XxSpyroKetchumxX NFS Carbon was one of the originals launch titles for the ps3 so it makes sense. What's cool is that that if you run the ps2 version through emulation at 4k 60fps, it can look better than the ps3 version in some ways.
gosh they really BOTCHED UP the PS3. the ps2 version is looking damn fine, not too far off from the PS3. But then it is interesting because we are still playing some of the PS3 era games remastered to 4k nowadays
More of a timing thing: Most Wanted released on November 11, 2005; Xbox 360 released on November 22, 2005; The PS3 was released (exacly) on November 11, 2006 with NFS Carbon as a launch title. And sadly EA probably didn’t care enough to port the game to the PS3 1 year later, since NFS was in the “yearly release” phase.
I've played the 360 version first, so to me the PS2/XBOX version may look bad to me. Imagine doing race wars on PS2/XBOX, must be very impressive that 20 racers fit on older consoles of the time.
ps2 almost looks identical to the ps3 the only thing that hold the ps2 back mostly was the resolution put the ps2 into HD then it would almost me the same in graphics ps2 needs HD to look amazing but the ps3 looks really good being a early release game
i had the ps2 version and it was indeed quite solid, better than the kind of bad underground 2 and most wanted ports before. but i dont like how they took out the cutscenes with the peoples faces sitting in their cars. could have been easily done with video files if the ps2 couldnt handle the graphics. but they left them out to have a selling point for the next gen versions imo
Im pretty sure thats no PS3 Version. The PS3 version had an extremely absurd ammount of motion blur that you couldnt turn off and a noticeable purple tint across all game, not only in the FrontEnd.
I'm spoiled by the graphics in modern racing games. But man, I used to think the PS2 version realistic as f*ck. My friend was like: it looks like sh*t. I never understood until I compared it to different games.. 😂
На PS2 не так уж и плохо выглядит. А самой консоли на тот момент уже 6 лет было. Не раз эту версию прошёл на все карточки. Тем более я лучше эти звонки от персонажей послушаю, чем смотреть на эти смазанные рожи на движке игры.
NFS Carbon was released in October 2006 from the Gamecube/PS2/OG Xbox/Xbox 360/PC/ platforms, console re-release in November 2006 PS3/Wii, obviously NFS Carbon on PS3 and Xbox 360 is still working, so Scarface The World is Yours was released in October 2006 PS2/OG Xbox/PC, console re-release in 2007 from Wii, So Scarface The World is Yours has not been re-released PS3/Xbox 360 style from NFS Carbon PS3/Xbox 360 will work, but why Scarface The World is Yours was on PS3 and Xbox 360 so it still doesn't work and was canceled next generation
I miss the old "Police Civic Cruisers" i think they were called, and the lights, what brand of car were they even supposed to be? i always remember the older artstyle and have good memories, of course in modern need for speed we have the Ford Crown Victoria and Dodge Charger as the main real life police cruisers in high quality now.
Я тут все сокрушаюсь, что NFS Most Wanted 2005 для PC портировали версию для Xbox Original, а не Xbox 360. Последняя намного красивее и детализированнее, с кучей новых эффектов и внятной дистанцией прорисовки. И выглядит в разы круче, чем все эти фанатские HD-поделки-сборки для PC. Минус X360-версии в том, что это ранняя игра поколения и у нее очень неровный фреймпейсинг (несколько некомфортно играть)
There's absolutely nothing on ps2 that looks even close to Ps3 not even Black, PS3 is the Biggest Jump or Leap in Graphics Ever all will Forever Be due to much facts including the fact that Ps3 already Touch Reality Level of Emulation of Real Life Pictures Meaning That Much People Would Consider what they saw on Ps3 as Close to a Movie or Real Life before any other console, and what Ps4 and Ps5 did does Absolutely Not give a graphical leap because Ps3 Hardware Arive in a Time where Computing advanced so much that the Gpus could simulate Real life like Videos like that, the PS3 has The Biggest Leap in Performance from all Playstations and probably all Consoles, PS3 Cell is 40x faster than PS2 Cpu E.E of 6 Gflops, and PS3 Rsx Gpu G70 is about the same, Rsx G70 does 192 Gflops and had 302 millions of Transistors while ps2 Gpu had 50 millions of Transistors but flops are unknown that if it's Gpu is capable of doing flops calculation, anyways, Cell does 230 Gflops on 32 Bits Fp, Emotion Engine 6 Gflops, 6 x 40: 240, or 6 x 38: 228, so Cell was 38 times More Powerful than Emotion Engine, nearly 40 times faster, Cell could be pushed to 4Ghz clock and that Gives 256 Gflops just from the 8 SPES and 288 Gflops with 8 SPES and The 1 Ppe Core from Cell or as Available on Ps3 7 SPES + 1 Ppe at 4ghz: 256 Gflops, so at 4ghz Cell was 48 times faster than Emotion Engine, 6 vs 288, Cell was Said to be able to run at 6Ghz ON IBM Labs and the Team who Develop it, if you ask why not was not running at 6ghz on Ps3, then theres very simple answers to that, at 6ghz Cell would consume nearly twice the Energy Power and would need Twice the Size of Heatsink so for Sony it wold be better if Ps3 was as its cause at 3.2ghz Cell Ps3 end up already too much expensive!! PS3 Cok-001 mainboard already consumes 210 watts but yea the original power supply has a power level of 382 Watts which may prove that that Super powerful psu may be made with a Higher Clock Cell in made, it's True that Ps3 Rsx Gpu was aimed to run at 550mhz and have an downclock of 9% in launch 2006 to 500mhz, but it's nothing compared to what the psu could deliver, the Rsx on Ps3 90nm original consumes about nearly 100 watts so even 10% more on Gpu clock would be only 10 watts More and Ps3 would consume from standard 2006 with 500mhz 210 to Planned before 2006 220 watts and still 160 watts of Psu left to No US at all, this highly suggest that it was indeed to an higher clock Cell BroadBand Engine Cpu, if Cell where Clock at 4ghz which would be 25% more it would consume from 100 watts original 3.2ghz to 125 watts on 4ghz which still would have a Hugh power left on the Power Supply or Psu, 25 watts more is nothing compared to the 160 watts left on the Psu, would left 135 watts left gape.
![เป็นไปได้ไหม - WanMai [Teaser] | 05-12-24](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P5Uto6e453w/mqdefault.jpg)
PS2 version is very solid. The last PS2 games were really next-gen games already - God of War2, Black, Burnout Revenge, this NfS... great generation.
FF12, can't miss out on that in this conversation. One of the best looking games on the PS2. They could have spruced up the res to 720p and cleaned up the aliasing and release it on the PS3 and it'd still be called one of the best looking games. Lots of early JRPGs on the PS3 looked similar to FF12
@@aninfinitemindofmusicandreams of course - amazing BIG open world - great characters! Also Shadow of the Collosus - giants were super impressive.
@@lechistanskiswit320 COULD YOU SHUT UP PS2 LOVER, GO BACK TO CAVE PLAY YOUR PS2, if you love ps2 and your pathetic ps2 and vintage stuff go back to Your Cave!!! You know nothing about graphics, Resident Evil 4 on ps2 Look absolutely horrible, the ganado are literally like a Minecraft blurred squared character, there's absolutely nothing on ps2 that looks even close to Ps3 not even Black, PS3 is the Biggest Jump or Leap in Graphics Ever all will Forever Be due to much facts including the fact that Ps3 already Touch Reality Level of Emulation of Real Life Pictures Meaning That Much People Would Consider what they on Ps3 as Close to a Movie or Real Life before any other console, and what Ps4 and Ps5 did does Absolutely Not give a graphical leap because Ps3 Hardware Arive in a Time where Computing advanced so much that the Gpus could simulate Real life like Videos like that, the PS3 has The Biggest Leap in Performance from all Playstations and probably all Consoles, PS3 Cell is 40x faster than PS2 Cpu E.E of 6 Gflops, and PS3 Rsx Gpu G70 is about the same, Rsx G70 does 192 Gflops and had 302 millions of Transistors while ps2 Gpu had 50 millions of Transistors but flops are unknown that if it's Gpu is capable of doing flops calculation, anyways, Cell does 230 Gflops on 32 Bits Fp, Emotion Engine 6 Gflops, 6 x 40: 240, or 6 x 38: 228, so Cell was 38 times More Powerful than Emotion Engine, nearly 40 times faster, Cell could be pushed to 4Ghz clock and that Gives 256 Gflops just from the 8 SPES and 288 Gflops with 8 SPES and The 1 Ppe Core from Cell or as Available on Ps3 7 SPES + 1 Ppe at 4ghz: 256 Gflops, so at 4ghz Cell was 48 times faster than Emotion Engine, 6 vs 288, Cell was Said to be able to run at 6Ghz ON IBM Labs and the Team who Develop it, if you ask why not was not running at 6ghz on Ps3, then theres very simple answers to that, at 6ghz Cell would consume nearly twice the Energy Power and would need Twice the Size of Heatsink so for Sony it wold be better if Ps3 was as its cause at 3.2ghz Cell Ps3 end up already too much expensive!! PS3 Cok-001 mainboard already consumes 210 watts but yea the original power supply has a power level of 382 Watts which may prove that that Super powerful psu may be made with a Higher Clock Cell in made, it's True that Ps3 Rsx Gpu was aimed to run at 550mhz and have an downclock of 9% in launch 2006 to 500mhz, but it's nothing compared to what the psu could deliver, the Rsx on Ps3 90nm original consumes about nearly 100 watts so even 10% more on Gpu clock would be only 10 watts More and Ps3 would consume from standard 2006 with 500mhz 210 to Planned before 2006 220 watts and still 160 watts of Psu left to No US at all, this highly suggest that it was indeed to an higher clock Cell BroadBand Engine Cpu, if Cell where Clock at 4ghz which would be 25% more it would consume from 100 watts original 3.2ghz to 125 watts on 4ghz which still would have a Hugh power left on the Power Supply or Psu, 25 watts more is nothing compared to the 160 watts left on the Psu, would left 135 watts left gape.
@@lechistanskiswit320 @lechistanskiswit320 COULD YOU SHUT UP PS2 LOVER, GO BACK TO CAVE PLAY YOUR PS2, if you love ps2 and your pathetic ps2 and vintage stuff go back to Your Cave!!! You know nothing about graphics, Resident Evil 4 on ps2 Look absolutely horrible, the ganado are literally like a Minecraft blurred squared character, there's absolutely nothing on ps2 that looks even close to Ps3 not even Black, PS3 is the Biggest Jump or Leap in Graphics Ever all will Forever Be due to much facts including the fact that Ps3 already Touch Reality Level of Emulation of Real Life Pictures Meaning That Much People Would Consider what they on Ps3 as Close to a Movie or Real Life before any other console, and what Ps4 and Ps5 did does Absolutely Not give a graphical leap because Ps3 Hardware Arive in a Time where Computing advanced so much that the Gpus could simulate Real life like Videos like that, the PS3 has The Biggest Leap in Performance from all Playstations and probably all Consoles, PS3 Cell is 40x faster than PS2 Cpu E.E of 6 Gflops, and PS3 Rsx Gpu G70 is about the same, Rsx G70 does 192 Gflops and had 302 millions of Transistors while ps2 Gpu had 50 millions of Transistors but flops are unknown that if it's Gpu is capable of doing flops calculation, anyways, Cell does 230 Gflops on 32 Bits Fp, Emotion Engine 6 Gflops, 6 x 40: 240, or 6 x 38: 228, so Cell was 38 times More Powerful than Emotion Engine, nearly 40 times faster, Cell could be pushed to 4Ghz clock and that Gives 256 Gflops just from the 8 SPES and 288 Gflops with 8 SPES and The 1 Ppe Core from Cell or as Available on Ps3 7 SPES + 1 Ppe at 4ghz: 256 Gflops, so at 4ghz Cell was 48 times faster than Emotion Engine, 6 vs 288, Cell was Said to be able to run at 6Ghz ON IBM Labs and the Team who Develop it, if you ask why not was not running at 6ghz on Ps3, then theres very simple answers to that, at 6ghz Cell would consume nearly twice the Energy Power and would need Twice the Size of Heatsink so for Sony it wold be better if Ps3 was as its cause at 3.2ghz Cell Ps3 end up already too much expensive!! PS3 Cok-001 mainboard already consumes 210 watts but yea the original power supply has a power level of 382 Watts which may prove that that Super powerful psu may be made with a Higher Clock Cell in made, it's True that Ps3 Rsx Gpu was aimed to run at 550mhz and have an downclock of 9% in launch 2006 to 500mhz, but it's nothing compared to what the psu could deliver, the Rsx on Ps3 90nm original consumes about nearly 100 watts so even 10% more on Gpu clock would be only 10 watts More and Ps3 would consume from standard 2006 with 500mhz 210 to Planned before 2006 220 watts and still 160 watts of Psu left to No US at all, this highly suggest that it was indeed to an higher clock Cell BroadBand Engine Cpu, if Cell where Clock at 4ghz which would be 25% more it would consume from 100 watts original 3.2ghz to 125 watts on 4ghz which still would have a Hugh power left on the Power Supply or Psu, 25 watts more is nothing compared to the 160 watts left on the Psu, would left 135 watts left gape.
@@lechistanskiswit320 @lechistanskiswit320 COULD YOU SHUT UP PS2 LOVER, GO BACK TO CAVE PLAY YOUR PS2, if you love ps2 and your pathetic ps2 and vintage stuff go back to Your Cave!!! You know nothing about graphics, Resident Evil 4 on ps2 Look absolutely horrible, the ganado are literally like a Minecraft blurred squared character, there's absolutely nothing on ps2 that looks even close to Ps3 not even Black, PS3 is the Biggest Jump or Leap in Graphics Ever all will Forever Be due to much facts including the fact that Ps3 already Touch Reality Level of Emulation of Real Life Pictures Meaning That Much People Would Consider what they on Ps3 as Close to a Movie or Real Life before any other console, and what Ps4 and Ps5 did does Absolutely Not give a graphical leap because Ps3 Hardware Arive in a Time where Computing advanced so much that the Gpus could simulate Real life like Videos like that, the PS3 has The Biggest Leap in Performance from all Playstations and probably all Consoles, PS3 Cell is 40x faster than PS2 Cpu E.E of 6 Gflops, and PS3 Rsx Gpu G70 is about the same, Rsx G70 does 192 Gflops and had 302 millions of Transistors while ps2 Gpu had 50 millions of Transistors but flops are unknown that if it's Gpu is capable of doing flops calculation, anyways, Cell does 230 Gflops on 32 Bits Fp, Emotion Engine 6 Gflops, 6 x 40: 240, or 6 x 38: 228, so Cell was 38 times More Powerful than Emotion Engine, nearly 40 times faster, Cell could be pushed to 4Ghz clock and that Gives 256 Gflops just from the 8 SPES and 288 Gflops with 8 SPES and The 1 Ppe Core from Cell or as Available on Ps3 7 SPES + 1 Ppe at 4ghz: 256 Gflops, so at 4ghz Cell was 48 times faster than Emotion Engine, 6 vs 288, Cell was Said to be able to run at 6Ghz ON IBM Labs and the Team who Develop it, if you ask why not was not running at 6ghz on Ps3, then theres very simple answers to that, at 6ghz Cell would consume nearly twice the Energy Power and would need Twice the Size of Heatsink so for Sony it wold be better if Ps3 was as its cause at 3.2ghz Cell Ps3 end up already too much expensive!! PS3 Cok-001 mainboard already consumes 210 watts but yea the original power supply has a power level of 382 Watts which may prove that that Super powerful psu may be made with a Higher Clock Cell in made, it's True that Ps3 Rsx Gpu was aimed to run at 550mhz and have an downclock of 9% in launch 2006 to 500mhz, but it's nothing compared to what the psu could deliver, the Rsx on Ps3 90nm original consumes about nearly 100 watts so even 10% more on Gpu clock would be only 10 watts More and Ps3 would consume from standard 2006 with 500mhz 210 to Planned before 2006 220 watts and still 160 watts of Psu left to No US at all, this highly suggest that it was indeed to an higher clock Cell BroadBand Engine Cpu, if Cell where Clock at 4ghz which would be 25% more it would consume from 100 watts original 3.2ghz to 125 watts on 4ghz which still would have a Hugh power left on the Power Supply or Psu, 25 watts more is nothing compared to the 160 watts left on the Psu, would left 135 watts left gape.
One of the differences between PS2 & PS3 is the traffic cars during the race event or pursuit event. In PS2, there are no traffic cars once the race/pursuit events start, making it impossible to do dynamic pursuit breaker.
And only 4 cars in all events, you + 3 ia cars, even war races, ps3 have 8 or 11 cars in this events
Yep
As someone who grew up on the PS3 version, I’m surprised at how well the PS2 version holds up
At time, my first contact with NFS Carbon was in PS2 version, because i don't had money to a afford a PS3 / 360 in 2006. I really like the game
Great
Police chases on the PS2 were crazy hard to evade😂
The PS3 version of Carbon the cops are slightly easier to evade.
@@purwantiallan5089in what way?
Y'all do know that you can beat carbon without getting into any police pursuits. 😂😂😂
@@purwantiallan5089 I played the PS2, PS3, and Wii versions and noticed virtually no difference in difficulty.
Bro, nfs on ps2 are hard af, idk why
Mistrzu mój! Jak tyś uderzył w moją nostalgię :D Obydwie ograne, z cudownymi wspomnieniami :D
rip Neville
Chamberlain?
Two great consoles♥ Great video! Thanks!
This and NFS Most Wanted (2005) and NFS Under Ground 2 (2004) are the best in series
also ground 1
1 cutscene from Carbon is better than the entire plot of Unbound. How NFS has Fallen is beyond comprehension.
It's not a high bar tbf
No NFS never had a good story
I played the PS2 version back in ‘06. A few years ago I bought the 360 version of this game. Holy cow was there a big jump! I was so thrown off! Not to mention the PS3/360 has the review mirror and cut scenes that were never in the PS2 version/the ones here in the video. It was like playing a whole ass new game!
sure on a LED Tv🤣
The weirdest thing about ps2 version is that has option for the rear view mirror but it doesn't show up on the screen.
The experienxe in both versions should be the same, excepting the cutscenes limitationa
For an 18 year old game like NFS CARBON, NFS CARBON both on PS2 and 3 are equally impressive!
Honestly, the only noticable differences I see here are the lighting and resolution. Things are a lot shinier and sharper on the PS3 than on PS2, and that's really it. Aside from those, you could tell me the PS2 version was the PS3 version and I'd believe you!
Some cars also sound different in the PS2 and PS3 ports as well but aside from that they're pretty much the same
The PS3 version is just the ps2 version with better textures, reflections, resolution etc. the game was designed for the 6th generation of consoles
@@JDotLocNo, it was made originally for the seventh gen consoles. There are many unused cars in the sixth gen consoles that you can only obtain in the other newer versions. Also the engine in both gens is the same from MW 2005 on Xbox 360, you can notice it for effects such the NO2 trails.
It is incredible that this game runs on consoles like the PS2.
Wow the PS2 did a fantastic job of being very close to the PS3.
The ps3 version is just the ps2 version with better textures, reflections etc
@@JDotLoc indeed, NFS Carbon was still based on the PS2 architecture and then ported to all the other consoles
Most probably the PS3 version is just an upgrade from the PS2 version, like most early crossgen games.
@@XxSpyroKetchumxX NFS Carbon was one of the originals launch titles for the ps3 so it makes sense.
What's cool is that that if you run the ps2 version through emulation at 4k 60fps, it can look better than the ps3 version in some ways.
Let's be real, it's not close. Way better textures, lights, reflections, better models, and the image is not blurry anymore.
Ps3 version, is the best version of this game, like most wanted in xbox 360.
interior details seem lacking on PS2
They don't have interiors at all
I play alot this game on 2011 and still love it ❤
My favourite NFS at all!, i've played in PS2, PS3, Xbox 360 and PC, and i get the Collector's Edition for PS2 and Xbox 360
gosh they really BOTCHED UP the PS3. the ps2 version is looking damn fine, not too far off from the PS3. But then it is interesting because we are still playing some of the PS3 era games remastered to 4k nowadays
I loved Carnon!! Especially menu music 🎶
This game and nfs underground 2 really nostalgic
The PS3 version is probably the best looking version of the game, although the Xbox 360 version does have slightly better image quality.
Pc version with a wide-screen fix at native 4k is best
i never tried the ps3 version but i can tell you from experience the 360 video quality in this game wasnt that great lol
@@i3l4ckskillzz79 of course it is! its modded
@@CertifiedWTRPerson i wouldn´t cinsider this as modded. it´s simply at higher resolution and better fps
The PS3 version is just sharper with some added creepy animations
They put Carbon on PS3, but not Most Wanted.
X360 had both.. i guess exclusivity deal?
More of a timing thing:
Most Wanted released on November 11, 2005; Xbox 360 released on November 22, 2005;
The PS3 was released (exacly) on November 11, 2006 with NFS Carbon as a launch title.
And sadly EA probably didn’t care enough to port the game to the PS3 1 year later, since NFS was in the “yearly release” phase.
Все таки скорость лучше ощущается в версии для PS2 нежели более гладкой и сияющей версии для PS3 или ПК. Thumbs Up!
I've played the 360 version first, so to me the PS2/XBOX version may look bad to me. Imagine doing race wars on PS2/XBOX, must be very impressive that 20 racers fit on older consoles of the time.
There's no race wars on 6th gen
@@damiank9443 none on PS2/XBOX? Ok, i guess you can expect that, still a good thing there is a version for the weaker consoles.
The race wars only existed in PS3, X360 and PC port. For some reason, the PC version only have 12 racers instead of 20 in that mode.
@@govinlock8568Is pc ported from the xbox 360 or ps2?
@@minenhledlamini4206 Graphics wise, the PC is closer to Xbox 360 than PS2
ps2 almost looks identical to the ps3 the only thing that hold the ps2 back mostly was the resolution put the ps2 into HD then it would almost me the same in graphics ps2 needs HD to look amazing but the ps3 looks really good being a early release game
My childhood game
I want to see a ps3 and GameCube comparison
PS2 Just has that stank that I like
RIP Neville :(
i had the ps2 version and it was indeed quite solid, better than the kind of bad underground 2 and most wanted ports before. but i dont like how they took out the cutscenes with the peoples faces sitting in their cars. could have been easily done with video files if the ps2 couldnt handle the graphics. but they left them out to have a selling point for the next gen versions imo
I agree with you, if EA put everything in PS2 version, why people would buy the PS3 version
Im pretty sure thats no PS3 Version.
The PS3 version had an extremely absurd ammount of motion blur that you couldnt turn off and a noticeable purple tint across all game, not only in the FrontEnd.
Sure, PS3 looks more realistic... But the PS2 one gives you the feeling that this is gonna be one hell of a fun game.
I see the advantage of PS3 over PC
The taillight is on
Great, just in time to choose which version to pick, it has only been like 18 years since it released!!
Excellent Gameplay Video Sir
at 240p they look identical.
The PS3 could’ve been a perfect version if it wasn’t for that annoying safe feature
Still looking better than on my laptop
Is this the same disc or are they different discs? because I know that the PS3 can run PS2 games
Two different versions
PS3 is just PC graphics
It was early ps3 game imagine came out like 2012
i remember ps2 version is without race war mode that exist in ps3 or x360
I prefer PlayStation 2😒
your driving skill...
I'm spoiled by the graphics in modern racing games.
But man, I used to think the PS2 version realistic as f*ck.
My friend was like: it looks like sh*t. I never understood until I compared it to different games.. 😂
where to get the PS3 version carbon and most wanted? online
На PS2 не так уж и плохо выглядит. А самой консоли на тот момент уже 6 лет было. Не раз эту версию прошёл на все карточки. Тем более я лучше эти звонки от персонажей послушаю, чем смотреть на эти смазанные рожи на движке игры.
Who’s driving? 💀
NFS Carbon was released in October 2006 from the Gamecube/PS2/OG Xbox/Xbox 360/PC/ platforms, console re-release in November 2006 PS3/Wii, obviously NFS Carbon on PS3 and Xbox 360 is still working, so Scarface The World is Yours was released in October 2006 PS2/OG Xbox/PC, console re-release in 2007 from Wii, So Scarface The World is Yours has not been re-released PS3/Xbox 360 style from NFS Carbon PS3/Xbox 360 will work, but why Scarface The World is Yours was on PS3 and Xbox 360 so it still doesn't work and was canceled next generation
nfs undercover ps2 and ps3 lmao dont wanna talk about it
PS2 has better magic. PS3 is better tech.
Idk about you but ps2 seems to have 60 fps more often than the ps3
I can't control the cars on the PS2.. it's like input lag or something.
On PC with a controller it's easy though.
i remembe when the ps2 demo leaked lol
Bro was crashing a lot in both systems was all I was noticing 😅😅 haha jk
When i can buy fr ps3
я и не знал что на пс2 был карбон
eu nem sabia que tinha versao de xbox 360 e ps3
Ps3 💪💪
I miss the old "Police Civic Cruisers" i think they were called, and the lights, what brand of car were they even supposed to be? i always remember the older artstyle and have good memories, of course in modern need for speed we have the Ford Crown Victoria and Dodge Charger as the main real life police cruisers in high quality now.
The PS3 version is just a port
xbox 360 version is better
PS3 looks even trashier than PC on max PC version was impressive
ps3 is your pc
nfs carbon on ps3 doesnt exist
PC смеётся над этим делом просто во весь голос.
Я тут все сокрушаюсь, что NFS Most Wanted 2005 для PC портировали версию для Xbox Original, а не Xbox 360. Последняя намного красивее и детализированнее, с кучей новых эффектов и внятной дистанцией прорисовки. И выглядит в разы круче, чем все эти фанатские HD-поделки-сборки для PC. Минус X360-версии в том, что это ранняя игра поколения и у нее очень неровный фреймпейсинг (несколько некомфортно играть)
@@justmkipvme да, дадада, поддерживаю буквально каждое слово!
@@justmkipvme Modders have already ported the X360 assets and shaders to PC, just do a quick search...
yeah you might be the worst driver ive seen tho
Yeah you might be the worst commenter I've seen tho
@@Cycu1 otherwise good vid
agreed, he is pretty bad/sloppy all around
What a noob plays on ps2 😂
What a noob comments under my video?!
There's absolutely nothing on ps2 that looks even close to Ps3 not even Black, PS3 is the Biggest Jump or Leap in Graphics Ever all will Forever Be due to much facts including the fact that Ps3 already Touch Reality Level of Emulation of Real Life Pictures Meaning That Much People Would Consider what they saw on Ps3 as Close to a Movie or Real Life before any other console, and what Ps4 and Ps5 did does Absolutely Not give a graphical leap because Ps3 Hardware Arive in a Time where Computing advanced so much that the Gpus could simulate Real life like Videos like that, the PS3 has The Biggest Leap in Performance from all Playstations and probably all Consoles, PS3 Cell is 40x faster than PS2 Cpu E.E of 6 Gflops, and PS3 Rsx Gpu G70 is about the same, Rsx G70 does 192 Gflops and had 302 millions of Transistors while ps2 Gpu had 50 millions of Transistors but flops are unknown that if it's Gpu is capable of doing flops calculation, anyways, Cell does 230 Gflops on 32 Bits Fp, Emotion Engine 6 Gflops, 6 x 40: 240, or 6 x 38: 228, so Cell was 38 times More Powerful than Emotion Engine, nearly 40 times faster, Cell could be pushed to 4Ghz clock and that Gives 256 Gflops just from the 8 SPES and 288 Gflops with 8 SPES and The 1 Ppe Core from Cell or as Available on Ps3 7 SPES + 1 Ppe at 4ghz: 256 Gflops, so at 4ghz Cell was 48 times faster than Emotion Engine, 6 vs 288, Cell was Said to be able to run at 6Ghz ON IBM Labs and the Team who Develop it, if you ask why not was not running at 6ghz on Ps3, then theres very simple answers to that, at 6ghz Cell would consume nearly twice the Energy Power and would need Twice the Size of Heatsink so for Sony it wold be better if Ps3 was as its cause at 3.2ghz Cell Ps3 end up already too much expensive!! PS3 Cok-001 mainboard already consumes 210 watts but yea the original power supply has a power level of 382 Watts which may prove that that Super powerful psu may be made with a Higher Clock Cell in made, it's True that Ps3 Rsx Gpu was aimed to run at 550mhz and have an downclock of 9% in launch 2006 to 500mhz, but it's nothing compared to what the psu could deliver, the Rsx on Ps3 90nm original consumes about nearly 100 watts so even 10% more on Gpu clock would be only 10 watts More and Ps3 would consume from standard 2006 with 500mhz 210 to Planned before 2006 220 watts and still 160 watts of Psu left to No US at all, this highly suggest that it was indeed to an higher clock Cell BroadBand Engine Cpu, if Cell where Clock at 4ghz which would be 25% more it would consume from 100 watts original 3.2ghz to 125 watts on 4ghz which still would have a Hugh power left on the Power Supply or Psu, 25 watts more is nothing compared to the 160 watts left on the Psu, would left 135 watts left gape.