What are you not getting about something being the same length but longer take a 2m long rope then another 2m long rope but the 2nd one is longer. This is basic howardology bro
@@stevendee6800 because he was referring to the size of the field when he elaborated on the longer after the wavelength. Which are 2 distinct variables
Chemist here, Mendeleevs PTOE is perfectly designed. It’s orders all matter based on Atomic activity, reactivity, size and structure. When you throw light or energy waveforms in the mix like what I believe Terrance is explaining, we call that the light spectrum. Where all elements refract light and waveform energy when exposed to light or other energy (lithium-red, cobalt-blue, etc.) each element has their “fingerprint”. While organizing the elements based on light and wavelength activity (Walter Russell) would just be a different way to organize elements based on reactivity to light energy. Then he justs goes into how different ions of different elements form their ionic and covalent bonds. Just a different way of organizing elements based on something that our world will probably not utilize in practical ways of science or reference.
um nooo, because light/energy is the basis of all existence (matter) the proper way to order matter is based on light/energy...basically the traditional table of elements is a ham-handed approach to ordering matter which is less practical UNLESS it is to disguise the simplicity of God's design so that it will not be useful to common man...Science is dominated by Government Control
It could very well be useful to arrange the periodic table by some other value. That being said, the fact remains that the present table still has value, it probably doesn't take 40 years to arrange it some other way, and just because someone did it already, doesn't make Terrance a genius for quitting school because he claims to have wanted to do the same thing. Edit: Btw, the atomic number is protons, not electrons.
There is, because an electron is not a particle, so is light and all other elemental "particles" they are packets of continuous energy that become more discrete (less variability and more bias) when interacting with a mechanism that gives away information.
@@dougdupont6134it’s arranged by both atomic number and number of valence electrons. Each element within a “group” have the same number of valence electrons and react in a predictable way. But, yes, it is also arranged from smallest to largest atomic number
@@GNP3WP3W I can't argue much with that except to say that valence electrons are the columns (generally) and the groups are a different sort of classification. E.g. Carbon and Silicon both have four valence electrons, and are thus both capable of creating macromolecules (more or less), but one is a non metal, and one is a semi metal. I'm not a chemist, I'm a philosopher, so please enlighten me if I've made a mistake. With that said, the OP said "electrons present within an atom" were the defining quantity by which the elements are ordered, and that just isn't true. An element can have varying number of electrons (and neutrons, for that matter) and would still occupy the same place on the periodic table. The defining value of an element is its protons.... without the same number of protons, it would be a different element, and, thus, the defining value by which the table is ordered. As you point out, however, it's not the only one. I appreciate your correction.
I remember when I communicated with Terrence Howard in the womb telepathically he said that if his ideas ever made it to a platform called TH-cam and I was alive to comment on it he would send me $1million and the secrets to the universe
When I was finishing my BS in Mathematics and preparing to enter graduate school, I told my professor and advisor (whom i admired), about a revelation I had (let me acknowledge up front that having a revelation and being correct are not the same thing) about how, rather than splitting atoms, we are actually opening space into another dimension and releasing its energy. My advisor got up, walked over and closed the door, and warned me to never talk about stuff like that because I would become a laughingstock and my reputation would be ruined. And after that conversation, he became distant with me. I went on to study data science instead. I wish I would have stuck with my idea. Even if I was wrong -- and I probably was because there are infinitely more wrong answers than there are correct answers, I would have learned so much and uncovered other things along that journey. Instead, I became an analyst. It's a good living; but I was fortunate enough to have an original idea, a starting point, and i abandoned it before i ever started pursuing it. I will never discourage someone from pursuing an insight that seems wacky to others.
Many dreams have been shattered by someone else's ego. Someone said that the richest place on earth was the cemetery because the majority of people die with unfulfilled hopes and dreams.
yeah fr on that... look at what we thought we knew as science 50, 100, 200 years ago. there is no reason not to question paradigms especially if there is a decent idea behind it all.. open it to scrutiny and in turn help that person either prove it wrong or right.
He actually is though. He just isn’t explaining it very well. These are complex topics within multiple fields that he is weaving together- cell microbiology meets physics meets physiology meets organic chemistry meets the science of sound/vibration/energy/frequency
@@kenniepennie9668Hes definitely not making sense coming from a BioChemist... This is an interesting pattern at the least, but its absolutely not a "better" periodic table.
There are many versions of the period table. They are valuable for seeing relationships and patterns that aren't easily revealed by the Mendeleev model. The current version including element 118, Oganesson, have been validated with experimental data. Walter Russell's version of the periodic table (aka the "Russellian Science") was not adopted by chemists because it was based on his philosophical and metaphysical theories rather than empirical evidence and experimental data.
@@Jamar-lg9ob Great question. Empirical evidence is based on real world results verified by observation and experience rather than theory or pure logic.
@@Jamar-lg9ob Exactly. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is a great example. It opened the door to more discoveries than could *not* have been predicted. Physics and chemistry often show counterintuitive results, especially when variables (temperature, speed, time, mass, etc.) approach extreme values.
@@20july1944 "Could be that's why African science is where it is." ---- So, what science is Neil DeGrasse Tyson doing? Racists can't help themselves. lol
I just for fun did a double check, and he is correct, so the table shows the size of the nucleus, and its determined by frequency. But im not sure he should use the term "Tone", hydrogen is at F#. So the genetic sequence is preprogrammed, and if a "Big Nucleus " comes into our "Small nucleus" it shatters the bonds, so to simplify it, there is a game called io.blob, big eats small. Source; Looney Tunes
If he could just decipher the exact sequence of notes Jimmy Hendrix played at Woodstock, Terrence could turn lead into gold. That's why they call me the Genius.
He's talking about resonance frequencies and harmonics. This is why in MRI our organs which have their own unique chemical make up respond to the different frequencies
Same guy, yes. He's trying to debunk math by using grammar. The word "multiply" means to add, according to him. He thinks numbers are bound by the words we use to describe an action.
If you give one apple one time, then there is no multiplication involved. And there's a word for that. Once. Meaning one time. Alternatively, if we could accept neither. 1x1=1 should not be included in multiplication because it doesn't multiply. 1x0=0 is even more absurd. How can that exist in reality? 1x0=1 makes sense. Yet, we are told that something multiplied by nothing equals nothing. That something magically disappears. 🤔
@Chevyno10 Yes, the words don't describe the function. We use two different words, times and multiply, each having a different meaning. But, the meaning of a word doesn't change the function of the x in math. You can call it a snarbleguk. Say you snarbelguk 1 by 1. It doesn't change what the function does. It's just a question of grammar. It wouldn't change math in the slightest. Basically, just say times instead of multiply. Problem solved. You can't use grammar to explain math, and that's where the question of "how do you multiply something from nothing?" Comes from. But math is math, and words are words. Neither govern the other.
@@DrSpoculus In this case, it's not simply the language, it's clearly numerically off as well, we've just never bothered to address it. 1 x 0 = 0 is nonsensical in every way. In physics especially. What bout the = sign? In maths the = sign states that whatever is on the left of it MUST EQUAL the number on the right. There is no other meaning attached to the symbol =. Can we agree on that? so, then how can 1 x 1 = 1? That is not complying with the definition of the EQUAL (=) sign. 1 x 1 = 2, now that fulfils the definition, the rule, the axiom of EQUALS in mathematics. th-cam.com/video/EmfRI6lnGcY/w-d-xo.htmlsi=VbNd8fMk_qJQuId9 this link might add more context to this subject.I do understand where your coming from, and I'm just exploring this subject and not here to be argumentative, I hope we can have a open, respectful exchange about this and see where it goes. He might be wrong. But so far, I think he's got some valid points that is worthy of scrutiny, that is afterall, how science operates.
@@DrSpoculus I appreciate your point, however, the words 'multiply' & 'times' might be interchangeable BUT the meaning remains the same. Yes, your correct that the word doesn't matter, but I'm referring to the definition of multiplication, which does matter. One could say, 'Times' is a lemans or colloquial term for multiplication, the fact still remains that the meaning of both is the same. Multiplication - A mathematical operation that indicates how many times a number is ADDED to itself.Any definition you search will refer to the function of ADDING. So I think its fair to say, 1 x 1 = 1 is not adding anything. Therefore by the definition, it isn't a function of multiplication. 1 x 1 = 2 however, does fullfil the definition of multiplication. So, wouldn't it be better to either remove it from multiplication OR call it a placeholder function used ONLY in theoretical maths since it doesn't comply with reality. you can't apply that realistically except in equations? I think also, that people forget the context of all this. Terrence is discussing these elements in relation to finding (he believes) to be the Unified Theory of everything. It's not that 1x1 = 1 is completely wrong because we've come this far with it, but it has limitations and conflicts with physics, all of which are not present when 1 x 1 = 2 is applied (according to Terrence). Lastly, he makes a good point - our maths was established at a time when everyone believed the world was flat, hence they made maths conform to a flat 2D world. Today we know the world is a sphere, yet our maths has never been adjusted to represent reality in a 3D world. That's a fascinating discovery worth exploring don't you think?
Genius’s worship simplicity and make complex subjects simple, idiots worship complexity and make simple concepts complex. That’s you my friend I’m glad you can read a thesaurus.
I’m not a physics professor, but I have a B.S. in physics. This guy has no idea what he’s talking about and would easily fail any entry level chemistry exam. His SAT score is likely less than the amount of protons in a Hydrogen atom.
@Jokesonyouhaha They canceled affirmative action last year, which is actually good for me. I'm also not black in case that was what you were inferring. My profile picture is a picture of Gucci Mane.
The man said he was in school to be a chemical engineer. What does "the hood" have to do with anything. Perhaps it wasn't intentional, but your comment sounds racist.
@@S5King7it’s because he sounds insane. I don’t care what your credentials are, but if you come to me talking about dreams of the frequency of hydrogen atoms and new periodic tables, I’m gonna find you a padded room to stay in
Listen to actual scientists debate things and explain their findings. That will also make you think. Terrence Howard just lowered the collective IQ of everyone in the room. He talked. He said stuff. I'll give him that.
How many people will actually try the table salt oil test just blows me away. His perspective is interesting, he can visually account for the reactivity of the elemental reactive states and applications , and expresses the math and physics in music. I can see why the experts love this.
The table salt thing doesn't make much sense. If you have "chlorine" (Cl) making you itch, and you put table salt (NaCl), a strong electrolyte which dissolves into Na+ and Cl-, in your skin, you would end up with more chloride ions...
All energy and matter is in motion. He's talking about octaves, so as energy moves it travels in waves, it resonates at certain frequencies. There are some serious implications to Tesla! COOL!
Stop calling this dude a genius. Lol He's a physics student. He didn't discover anything. Everyone can regurgitate stuff other people discovered. I once had the idea to make cigarettes biodegradable, until I realized they were biodegradable, that doesn't make me a genius.
Yeah, every kid goes through this phase in college. In your first few weeks you learn things you never knew, it really clicks and you think you're a genius. Then, as you learn more, you eventually realise that you basically know nothing in the grand scheme of things and probably never will. Terrance is stuck in this first phase forever. He's always going to feel like the smartest person in the room, because he doesn't know enough to realise how clueless he is. He can't call himself on his own bs.
@@trevorward4762patents don't mean you are right. And the abstract for the VR was pretty generic. Companies will list any and all patents in the related field that are no longer active.
I mean, at the end of the day, we’re all living in a massive rock, blasting through an infinite space, where no one is in control where we are going. So what’s crazy?
Walter Russell was an early Intelligent Design advocate, though it was not called that at the time. He criticized the scientific community for not including religion in their research.
don't feel dumb, most of what Terrance is spouting is utter nonsense. he's just using a series of big words in close proximity to seem intelligent. if you're curious, you should find a creator who goes into some interesting chemistry like 3blue1brown, minutephysics, ASAPScience, or NileRed. there are plenty of people from whom you could learn something actually valuable.
This is what it feels like to really master something you’re passionate about. Scholars and book smart folks will never get it and feel offended to be exposed
@@lotharbig who's being exposed here? What makes you think Terrence has mastered this? Sure he speaks about it with confidence, but the fact of the matter is that the periodic table is formatted like that for very practical reasons. While the other charts he talked about do have their own intended purpose, they're not nearly as useful and they are not some transcendent, groundbreaking formation of elements. Also if you watch the full clip of him explaining this, it is clear that a lot of the things he's talking about are surrounded by some weird spiritual notions concerning the frequencies of elements and how that determines how they interact with each other. I'm not an expert but I defer to experts and I can assure you they're not on board with everything this guy is saying. I'm not trying to put down Terrence or bash his ideas. I don't know the guy, I'm sure he put a lot of time and effort into these ideas. But we have to look at everything people say with a critical lens and fact check them whenever possible.
That's exactly why people believe in what he is saying. He's just good at making things sound interesting and captivating to people. He could probably talk about any subject and people would believe him
I don't understand how people can listen to this guy spout nonsense and think "wow, this is amazing" but don't read into actual science and be amazed by it. There is a bunch of cool (and actually tested) stuff out there.
Basically failed general chemistry and didn't make it to organic Chem, Anybody curious what one year Chem engineering means. The periodic table is based off of numbers of protons. It has separate rows for electron shells. Ever so many electrons it makes a new shell of electrons and therefore another row. Alot of students drop out during this period because the complexity of it. If I remembered correctly this is General Chem 2 that most students take spring semester of freshman year. The shells determine if it's negative or positive basically because the shell is unbalanced and takes on extra electrons or loses some and makes a charge.
I am so glad that people like Terrence Howard exist.Thank God, the source of everything , conscience . Maybe we can get out of this Dark Age and learn the truth finally . I love you Mr. Howard keep doing good work, finally waking up Humanity to truth .
Terence is trying to re-organize it by behavior and not structure. The reason the Periodic Table is structured the way it is, it goes from the element with the lowest electrons to the highest electrons. Terence is trying to explain a hypothesis on how they relate. He isn't doing a good job in his explanation of the hypothesis. He is trying to say each element has another element that either pairs or repels a relationship on the same vein as magnetism.
As a musician, I was curious about the 40.5hz for "key of E". I did the math and that would be roughly A = 432hz, which I laughed at because I don't know, I shouldn't be surprised that Terrence is one of those people. But the math doesn't even work. It would be more like A = 432.48hz, which ruins the whole spirit science premise.
The explanation of the periodic table in a spiral by frequencies, light frequencies, sound frequencies. All Wrapped around each other, mix incredible, awesome sense. I can now understand. Why frequencies make up the universe and how it all connects together to make every single part. I knew I was missing some information because things didn't seem right to me. There was more to it nicola, tesla's work and seeing this periodic table in the manner that it is shown explains huge amounts of information That I have been studying and ties it all together. Thanks
Saying the PTotE is wrong is like saying western music notation is wrong. Its just one way of organizing information. If you find another way to organize the data, it doesnt negate the other ways
If anything he says is accurate, would he not be able to prove it or show some kind of practical use out of it? Or, is he just taking established science and throwing his own flair on it by calling it different terms? Let's look at ONE claim: If you want to break water down into its constituents, you need only add beryllium or its 'tone'. This is demonstrably false; beryllium does not react with water. So what the flying fuck is he talking about? Just stay on ONE topic for more than a few moments and you start to notice that he's really good at saying bullshit to people who don't know what the fuck he is talking about and it makes him seem smart.
Genius: 0.00 - 0.01% Madman: 99.99 - 100% I don't need empirical proof as Terrence doesn't need that either in a scientific paradigm that's dominated by empiricism.
When Howard Lattimer improved the lightbulb im sure they thought he was crazy too… all inventions and NEW theories make ppl look crazy because it’s not often that human beings see a brand new idea that never existed before
I'm not sure if I stepped on something but it smells like bullplop in here, "rub that salt and chlorine on your skin, to make them good oils" I'll remember that next time I am in some trenches and get mustard gasses 🤣
@@JeffPDX1 I know you’re joking, but just really want to emphasize that Beryllium does not react with water to make oxygen. It doesn’t react with water at all.
The periodicity is arranged by proton number. It is not intended to encapsulate every quality of atom. If this guy wasn’t an actor he’d be scrubbing floors and talking to passersby about his theory of everything
Socrates, Hypatia of Alexandria, Giordano Bruno, Michael Servetus, Galileo- all persecuted, some even burned at the stake for their beliefs against the institutions that stood in their time. Easy to make fun, but back then- all the people listed above sounded crazy- now they’re considered some of the greatest philosophers in history.
Except they contributed knowledge. Terry’s contribution is a dipshit claim about 1x1 that makes no sense and everything else he says he stole from another hack
Lay off meth kids. He doesn't have a doctorate in chemical engineering. The college he went too doesn't give a doctorate for chemical engineering. He's full of dung.
The man has a valid point. Past philosophers and scientists were burned at stake for such 'breaking away from that which is acceptable and established.' The secular world is scared shitless of a new and different level of progressive science that is "UNCONFORMED."
A sukajan (スカジャン), or a souvenir jacket, is a type of blouse jacket dating from the end of the Second World War. It is inspired by baseball jackets, and it uses embroidery, silk and Japanese influences (wikipedia)
@@wheres_bears1378 I don’t even know where to start with this… it’s silicon, not silicone, ffs. Silicones are a type of polymer. Silicon is a chemical element with an atomic number of 14, since its atoms have 14 protons. You’ve literally just proved that you have no idea why silicon is considered an element, when it’s one of the most basic things that you get taught about in your first few chemistry lessons. With a knowledge base like that, no wonder you take this narcissist’s word as gospel.
@@aguyonasiteontheinternetI stand corrected and you are correct 👍 thanks for the correction …… clearly I was being sarcastic 😉 I guess you can’t teach humour in a classroom, so you’re forgiven 😂 to be fair though I should have put the laughing emoji to indicated that my bad
He clearly knows what he's talking about; we just can't understand him right now. That's okay, everyone. Neil deGrasse Tyson is one of the smartest people on the planet, but if he couldn't simplify and explain his brilliance to us, we wouldn't get it either. Thankfully, he's really good at doing that.
Just because someone knows a lot about something doesn’t mean that something is right. The ideas here make almost zero sense if you understand basic chemistry.
Divide light by two and multiply 1x1, what do you get? Bisexual carbon.
lol love it ❤😂
It’s activated both ways.
😂
Oh snap we are carbon based life forms 🤣
Switch-hitting FTW!
Shining example of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.
This almost ruined my high
It's too much
Almost
U took to much man too much too much
That’s cause he’s in deep waters and you haven’t even stepped foot in shallow pond yet
"it's the same wavelength, just longer" 🎉🎉🎉😂🎉
What are you not getting about something being the same length but longer take a 2m long rope then another 2m long rope but the 2nd one is longer. This is basic howardology bro
Tell everyone neither of you know anything about wavelengths or physics without telling everyone you don't know anything about wavelengths or physics
@@OfTheVoid do elaborate
@@stevendee6800 because he was referring to the size of the field when he elaborated on the longer after the wavelength. Which are 2 distinct variables
Chemist here, Mendeleevs PTOE is perfectly designed. It’s orders all matter based on Atomic activity, reactivity, size and structure. When you throw light or energy waveforms in the mix like what I believe Terrance is explaining, we call that the light spectrum. Where all elements refract light and waveform energy when exposed to light or other energy (lithium-red, cobalt-blue, etc.) each element has their “fingerprint”. While organizing the elements based on light and wavelength activity (Walter Russell) would just be a different way to organize elements based on reactivity to light energy. Then he justs goes into how different ions of different elements form their ionic and covalent bonds. Just a different way of organizing elements based on something that our world will probably not utilize in practical ways of science or reference.
You would be amazed at how it is relevant for spiritual science, though….
@@Superlife1369 Science iS Spiritual....almost all the greatest scientists in history believed in God for a reason...
um nooo, because light/energy is the basis of all existence (matter) the proper way to order matter is based on light/energy...basically the traditional table of elements is a ham-handed approach to ordering matter which is less practical UNLESS it is to disguise the simplicity of God's design so that it will not be useful to common man...Science is dominated by Government Control
@@esuswalk2006 I agree with you 100% ❤️
He explained it horribly. Bro said spectrometer instead of spectrum.
When rich people have an awakening they become narcissistic messiahs
"become" or "always were but can afford to express themselves this way"
Dude said he remember being born 🤣 😂 💀
It happens with poor people too.
I also remember my left hand stroking me when before I was born.
I was always meant to become a trillionaire, but the water made me gay.
@@blackdynamite_5470 what the hell...
The periodic table is literally arranged by number of electrons present inside the atom. There is no logical reason to change that up
It could very well be useful to arrange the periodic table by some other value. That being said, the fact remains that the present table still has value, it probably doesn't take 40 years to arrange it some other way, and just because someone did it already, doesn't make Terrance a genius for quitting school because he claims to have wanted to do the same thing. Edit: Btw, the atomic number is protons, not electrons.
There is, because an electron is not a particle, so is light and all other elemental "particles" they are packets of continuous energy that become more discrete (less variability and more bias) when interacting with a mechanism that gives away information.
@@dougdupont6134it’s arranged by both atomic number and number of valence electrons. Each element within a “group” have the same number of valence electrons and react in a predictable way. But, yes, it is also arranged from smallest to largest atomic number
The periodic table should be a curved diagram because periodicity is a consequence of wave functions.
@@GNP3WP3W I can't argue much with that except to say that valence electrons are the columns (generally) and the groups are a different sort of classification. E.g. Carbon and Silicon both have four valence electrons, and are thus both capable of creating macromolecules (more or less), but one is a non metal, and one is a semi metal. I'm not a chemist, I'm a philosopher, so please enlighten me if I've made a mistake.
With that said, the OP said "electrons present within an atom" were the defining quantity by which the elements are ordered, and that just isn't true. An element can have varying number of electrons (and neutrons, for that matter) and would still occupy the same place on the periodic table. The defining value of an element is its protons.... without the same number of protons, it would be a different element, and, thus, the defining value by which the table is ordered. As you point out, however, it's not the only one. I appreciate your correction.
I remember when I communicated with Terrence Howard in the womb telepathically he said that if his ideas ever made it to a platform called TH-cam and I was alive to comment on it he would send me $1million and the secrets to the universe
When I was finishing my BS in Mathematics and preparing to enter graduate school, I told my professor and advisor (whom i admired), about a revelation I had (let me acknowledge up front that having a revelation and being correct are not the same thing) about how, rather than splitting atoms, we are actually opening space into another dimension and releasing its energy. My advisor got up, walked over and closed the door, and warned me to never talk about stuff like that because I would become a laughingstock and my reputation would be ruined. And after that conversation, he became distant with me. I went on to study data science instead.
I wish I would have stuck with my idea. Even if I was wrong -- and I probably was because there are infinitely more wrong answers than there are correct answers, I would have learned so much and uncovered other things along that journey. Instead, I became an analyst. It's a good living; but I was fortunate enough to have an original idea, a starting point, and i abandoned it before i ever started pursuing it.
I will never discourage someone from pursuing an insight that seems wacky to others.
never too late to be honest
Many dreams have been shattered by someone else's ego. Someone said that the richest place on earth was the cemetery because the majority of people die with unfulfilled hopes and dreams.
I hope you revisit the work! You may hold an answer we all need!
The professor gave you the best advice you could have had.
yeah fr on that... look at what we thought we knew as science 50, 100, 200 years ago. there is no reason not to question paradigms especially if there is a decent idea behind it all.. open it to scrutiny and in turn help that person either prove it wrong or right.
Chemist here: he isn't making sense.
Non chemist here: We already knew that.
He actually is though. He just isn’t explaining it very well. These are complex topics within multiple fields that he is weaving together- cell microbiology meets physics meets physiology meets organic chemistry meets the science of sound/vibration/energy/frequency
@@kenniepennie9668pls stop. for your own sake😂
@@alternxtiv sorry… just because YOU can’t follow it doesn’t mean it’s not valid
@@kenniepennie9668Hes definitely not making sense coming from a BioChemist...
This is an interesting pattern at the least, but its absolutely not a "better" periodic table.
There are many versions of the period table. They are valuable for seeing relationships and patterns that aren't easily revealed by the Mendeleev model. The current version including element 118, Oganesson, have been validated with experimental data.
Walter Russell's version of the periodic table (aka the "Russellian Science") was not adopted by chemists because it was based on his philosophical and metaphysical theories rather than empirical evidence and experimental data.
What's empirical evidence
@@Jamar-lg9ob Great question. Empirical evidence is based on real world results verified by observation and experience rather than theory or pure logic.
@@sydsalmon479 like applied science?
@@Jamar-lg9ob Exactly. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is a great example. It opened the door to more discoveries than could *not* have been predicted. Physics and chemistry often show counterintuitive results, especially when variables (temperature, speed, time, mass, etc.) approach extreme values.
Terrence is a great actor.
"Acting" is another way of saying "Channeling".
Could be that's why African science is where it is.
@@20july1944
"Could be that's why African science is where it is."
---- So, what science is Neil DeGrasse Tyson doing?
Racists can't help themselves.
lol
not sure about that either. he would've made it harder to see how dumb he is if he was such a great actor
I just for fun did a double check, and he is correct, so the table shows the size of the nucleus, and its determined by frequency. But im not sure he should use the term "Tone", hydrogen is at F#.
So the genetic sequence is preprogrammed, and if a "Big Nucleus " comes into our "Small nucleus" it shatters the bonds, so to simplify it, there is a game called io.blob, big eats small.
Source; Looney Tunes
F# best key lmao
@@neffix6976 I like G minor, dont confuse it with Kendrick Lamars version on what a minor key is.
Am
@@neffix6976 2019 lol
I feel like I'm having a stroke reading this 😂😵💫
If he could just decipher the exact sequence of notes Jimmy Hendrix played at Woodstock, Terrence could turn lead into gold. That's why they call me the Genius.
_"Jimi"_
@@wtfsalommy3250 JIMI in Hebrew = YAWH
He's talking about resonance frequencies and harmonics. This is why in MRI our organs which have their own unique chemical make up respond to the different frequencies
Can we get a chemist to talk about chemistry?
he is a chemist
@@MurphyTheOldManonly in his dreams
You ok man?@JohnHawkins-he7mg
You r not enlightened
There are several who agree with him. Others are fact checking him.
To everyone saying that genius is often hard to distinguish from insanity.. I'd argue that insanity often looks exactly like insanity.
This is the guy who thinks 1 x 1 = 2. According to him if I give you one apple one time, I gave you two apples.
Same guy, yes. He's trying to debunk math by using grammar. The word "multiply" means to add, according to him.
He thinks numbers are bound by the words we use to describe an action.
If you give one apple one time, then there is no multiplication involved. And there's a word for that. Once. Meaning one time.
Alternatively, if we could accept neither. 1x1=1 should not be included in multiplication because it doesn't multiply.
1x0=0 is even more absurd. How can that exist in reality? 1x0=1 makes sense. Yet, we are told that something multiplied by nothing equals nothing. That something magically disappears. 🤔
@Chevyno10 Yes, the words don't describe the function. We use two different words, times and multiply, each having a different meaning.
But, the meaning of a word doesn't change the function of the x in math. You can call it a snarbleguk. Say you snarbelguk 1 by 1. It doesn't change what the function does.
It's just a question of grammar. It wouldn't change math in the slightest. Basically, just say times instead of multiply. Problem solved.
You can't use grammar to explain math, and that's where the question of "how do you multiply something from nothing?" Comes from. But math is math, and words are words. Neither govern the other.
@@DrSpoculus In this case, it's not simply the language, it's clearly numerically off as well, we've just never bothered to address it. 1 x 0 = 0 is nonsensical in every way. In physics especially. What bout the = sign? In maths the = sign states that whatever is on the left of it MUST EQUAL the number on the right. There is no other meaning attached to the symbol =. Can we agree on that? so, then how can 1 x 1 = 1? That is not complying with the definition of the EQUAL (=) sign. 1 x 1 = 2, now that fulfils the definition, the rule, the axiom of EQUALS in mathematics.
th-cam.com/video/EmfRI6lnGcY/w-d-xo.htmlsi=VbNd8fMk_qJQuId9
this link might add more context to this subject.I do understand where your coming from, and I'm just exploring this subject and not here to be argumentative, I hope we can have a open, respectful exchange about this and see where it goes. He might be wrong. But so far, I think he's got some valid points that is worthy of scrutiny, that is afterall, how science operates.
@@DrSpoculus I appreciate your point, however, the words 'multiply' & 'times' might be interchangeable BUT the meaning remains the same. Yes, your correct that the word doesn't matter, but I'm referring to the definition of multiplication, which does matter. One could say, 'Times' is a lemans or colloquial term for multiplication, the fact still remains that the meaning of both is the same. Multiplication - A mathematical operation that indicates how many times a number is ADDED to itself.Any definition you search will refer to the function of ADDING. So I think its fair to say, 1 x 1 = 1 is not adding anything. Therefore by the definition, it isn't a function of multiplication. 1 x 1 = 2 however, does fullfil the definition of multiplication. So, wouldn't it be better to either remove it from multiplication OR call it a placeholder function used ONLY in theoretical maths since it doesn't comply with reality. you can't apply that realistically except in equations? I think also, that people forget the context of all this. Terrence is discussing these elements in relation to finding (he believes) to be the Unified Theory of everything. It's not that 1x1 = 1 is completely wrong because we've come this far with it, but it has limitations and conflicts with physics, all of which are not present when 1 x 1 = 2 is applied (according to Terrence). Lastly, he makes a good point - our maths was established at a time when everyone believed the world was flat, hence they made maths conform to a flat 2D world. Today we know the world is a sphere, yet our maths has never been adjusted to represent reality in a 3D world. That's a fascinating discovery worth exploring don't you think?
Levels of vainglorious grandiose self-delusion heretofore unimagined. Truly groundbreaking.
@@iPhake No, it turns out that some people have actual functioning brains to write sentences with.
@@iPhake ChatGPT would never produce such a strangled, purple sentence.
@@iPhake what's he saying?
Genius’s worship simplicity and make complex subjects simple, idiots worship complexity and make simple concepts complex. That’s you my friend I’m glad you can read a thesaurus.
@@Insomble says the person who spells the word geniuses WITH AN APOSTROPHE. lol
he is about to start a cult
😆
I had the same thought lmao
By half the comments, he already has😂
Is that any different than the US cult of the government taking money from the poor to fund unnecessary wars
He isn't starting one he's bringing idiots into one. Bro also pushes good and evil is just a perspective
This should be a movie ..he will kill the role of playing a college professor, trying to change the periodic table 😂
I need a physics professor and Terrance on at the same time 😅
Terrance couldn't solve any physics equations lmao
If you wrote push on a pull door Terrance would never get in
Dude didn’t even know Mendelev’s name lol
@@4500KneeGrow 😅😂 dawg..
I’m not a physics professor, but I have a B.S. in physics. This guy has no idea what he’s talking about and would easily fail any entry level chemistry exam. His SAT score is likely less than the amount of protons in a Hydrogen atom.
Terrance: I was going to recreate the periodic table but someone did it first.
Social media: Brilliant what a genius.
Me: Smh
I've been studying it wrong this WHOLE TIME. I hope this isn't on the MCAT next month. :(
Don't worry about the MCAT. You'll get into med school. Affirmative action at its finest
@Jokesonyouhaha They canceled affirmative action last year, which is actually good for me. I'm also not black in case that was what you were inferring. My profile picture is a picture of Gucci Mane.
@BigWopster it was a joke. Just like Terrence Howard's take on chemistry. Goodluck on your test
This is like a _Chappelle's Show_ skit of "if the hood invented physics".
The man said he was in school to be a chemical engineer. What does "the hood" have to do with anything. Perhaps it wasn't intentional, but your comment sounds racist.
@@S5King7it’s because he sounds insane. I don’t care what your credentials are, but if you come to me talking about dreams of the frequency of hydrogen atoms and new periodic tables, I’m gonna find you a padded room to stay in
@@spidermonkey7280 I get that, but if he were white, would someone have brought "the hood" into it? That's why it comes across as racist.
@@spidermonkey7280Well he should have said padded room instead of hood.
he's either insane or he's a genius
Insane
I'd lean towards genius!! He's very intelligent
A mix of both
A genius is always a little insane.
My exact thoughts.WHAT IF he's actually BEYOND us? Lol idk
This by far is Terrence’s greatest performance. He should receive an Academy Award!
He makes me think, I don't know if he's right or wrong, but I like it.
He’s wronf
Listen to actual scientists debate things and explain their findings. That will also make you think. Terrence Howard just lowered the collective IQ of everyone in the room. He talked. He said stuff. I'll give him that.
The real reason he didn't come back for Iron Man 2
How many people will actually try the table salt oil test just blows me away. His perspective is interesting, he can visually account for the reactivity of the elemental reactive states and applications , and expresses the math and physics in music. I can see why the experts love this.
They don‘t. Just like they don‘t like his idea of 1x1 = 2
The table salt thing doesn't make much sense. If you have "chlorine" (Cl) making you itch, and you put table salt (NaCl), a strong electrolyte which dissolves into Na+ and Cl-, in your skin, you would end up with more chloride ions...
Man's a genius 💯 😎
He's a moron dude.
Thankyou for sharing this! Most of the podcast was mumbo jumbo, but Walter Russell's science is undeniable!
All energy and matter is in motion. He's talking about octaves, so as energy moves it travels in waves, it resonates at certain frequencies. There are some serious implications to Tesla! COOL!
Bro here: This guy is a certified bro scientist.
He should of started with this 5:56 for us simple minded folks
Stop calling this dude a genius. Lol He's a physics student. He didn't discover anything. Everyone can regurgitate stuff other people discovered.
I once had the idea to make cigarettes biodegradable, until I realized they were biodegradable, that doesn't make me a genius.
Hahaha it's so bad it's funny
Then bad again
Yeah, every kid goes through this phase in college. In your first few weeks you learn things you never knew, it really clicks and you think you're a genius. Then, as you learn more, you eventually realise that you basically know nothing in the grand scheme of things and probably never will. Terrance is stuck in this first phase forever. He's always going to feel like the smartest person in the room, because he doesn't know enough to realise how clueless he is. He can't call himself on his own bs.
So his patents are bs? I can’t believe I actually believed facts. This comment from a random TH-cam profile is so much more credible.
@@trevorward4762patents don't mean you are right. And the abstract for the VR was pretty generic. Companies will list any and all patents in the related field that are no longer active.
@@NickHenry-t1e If the patent wasn't valid then companies wouldn't be listing it as a point of reference lol man what happened to logic
I mean, at the end of the day, we’re all living in a massive rock, blasting through an infinite space, where no one is in control where we are going. So what’s crazy?
I agree entirely my friend
Are we?
That's an easy question and an easy answer: Terrence's elementary school logic is crazy.
God
Walter Russell was an early Intelligent Design advocate, though it was not called that at the time. He criticized the scientific community for not including religion in their research.
Which they were right to do, as Christianity has no explanatory power in science whatsoever. Russell was a mystic and a hack
Goodness... I'm baffled at how dumb I am
don't feel dumb, most of what Terrance is spouting is utter nonsense. he's just using a series of big words in close proximity to seem intelligent. if you're curious, you should find a creator who goes into some interesting chemistry like 3blue1brown, minutephysics, ASAPScience, or NileRed. there are plenty of people from whom you could learn something actually valuable.
This is what it feels like to really master something you’re passionate about. Scholars and book smart folks will never get it and feel offended to be exposed
@@lotharbig who's being exposed here? What makes you think Terrence has mastered this? Sure he speaks about it with confidence, but the fact of the matter is that the periodic table is formatted like that for very practical reasons. While the other charts he talked about do have their own intended purpose, they're not nearly as useful and they are not some transcendent, groundbreaking formation of elements. Also if you watch the full clip of him explaining this, it is clear that a lot of the things he's talking about are surrounded by some weird spiritual notions concerning the frequencies of elements and how that determines how they interact with each other. I'm not an expert but I defer to experts and I can assure you they're not on board with everything this guy is saying. I'm not trying to put down Terrence or bash his ideas.
I don't know the guy, I'm sure he put a lot of time and effort into these ideas. But we have to look at everything people say with a critical lens and fact check them whenever possible.
He just taught me "God" used a microphone to split the oxygen/carbon from the red sea so moses could escape. I NEED MORE UNDERSTANDING!
mad as a box of frogs
😂😂😂😂 what a way to say that
Battier than a box of bats 😂
How do blind people even know when they wake up in the morning??
When the dream or nightmare ends.
Cause of the Alarm they set on their watches
Light has little to do with waking up. 90% of the time, i wake up 5 minutes before my alarm goes off
Because that s when they have a coffee and take a shit
Because they dropped acid the night before and slept really well and just woke up. Geez why make it complicated?
I did not expect this from Terrance. 🤯
Yeah delusions of grandeur is a helluva drug.
This is years in the making, his patents besides the VR, was granted in 2018 up to 2022 and only now is making it public
Yeah. I'm floored.
I'm not sure if what he is saying is true, but if it is, I would enjoy him as a teacher. He's so passionate about what he's sharing.
That's the sad thing. Most of what he is saying is bogus, but he would make a great physics teacher if he actually tested this stuff out.
That's exactly why people believe in what he is saying. He's just good at making things sound interesting and captivating to people. He could probably talk about any subject and people would believe him
This is the pseudo-academic version of: "I don't care what they tell you in school, Cleopatra was black."
Walter Russell was an artist no one took seriously in his day.
Damn, the original periodic table was so simple to understand. Now, I gotta re-learn how the universe works.
This ladies and gentlemen is what Wakanda looks like at its peak.
The Smartest Nigerian on the planet.
Man Hollywood makes people weird you guys can have the fame just give me the money
I don't understand how people can listen to this guy spout nonsense and think "wow, this is amazing" but don't read into actual science and be amazed by it. There is a bunch of cool (and actually tested) stuff out there.
Dumb masses :(
Keep in mind that half of the population has an IQ of
Basically failed general chemistry and didn't make it to organic Chem, Anybody curious what one year Chem engineering means.
The periodic table is based off of numbers of protons. It has separate rows for electron shells.
Ever so many electrons it makes a new shell of electrons and therefore another row. Alot of students drop out during this period because the complexity of it. If I remembered correctly this is General Chem 2 that most students take spring semester of freshman year. The shells determine if it's negative or positive basically because the shell is unbalanced and takes on extra electrons or loses some and makes a charge.
Also, it groups based upon similar properties. The application of this led to the transition of using Germanium to Silicone.
He was good in “Get Rich or Die Tryin”
I am so glad that people like Terrence Howard exist.Thank God, the source of everything , conscience . Maybe we can get out of this Dark Age and learn the truth finally . I love you Mr. Howard keep doing good work, finally waking up Humanity to truth .
Jesus Christ at least you could follow some hippy dippy quantum mechanics fraud, because they’re somewhat believable, but the 1x1=2 guy? Grow up.
Rogan's gotta get Tyson Beckford on. He said he has a photogenic memory
Terence is trying to re-organize it by behavior and not structure. The reason the Periodic Table is structured the way it is, it goes from the element with the lowest electrons to the highest electrons.
Terence is trying to explain a hypothesis on how they relate. He isn't doing a good job in his explanation of the hypothesis. He is trying to say each element has another element that either pairs or repels a relationship on the same vein as magnetism.
Remember kids, 1×1=2
Is that why I can hear color when I do acid?
Bro got the MOA of arsenic completely wrong and thought he ate😭
I dont know if this is factual but I'm impressed either way
It’s not factual
He doesn’t even understand 1x1 equation tho now he’s gonna re write the periodic table?? This is a lesson to us all not to buy our BS.
As a musician, I was curious about the 40.5hz for "key of E". I did the math and that would be roughly A = 432hz, which I laughed at because I don't know, I shouldn't be surprised that Terrence is one of those people. But the math doesn't even work. It would be more like A = 432.48hz, which ruins the whole spirit science premise.
The explanation of the periodic table in a spiral by frequencies, light frequencies, sound frequencies.
All Wrapped around each other, mix incredible, awesome sense.
I can now understand. Why frequencies make up the universe and how it all connects together to make every single part. I knew I was missing some information because things didn't seem right to me. There was more to it nicola, tesla's work and seeing this periodic table in the manner that it is shown explains huge amounts of information That I have been studying and ties it all together. Thanks
Saying the PTotE is wrong is like saying western music notation is wrong. Its just one way of organizing information. If you find another way to organize the data, it doesnt negate the other ways
Its just crazy enough it might actually work
If anything he says is accurate, would he not be able to prove it or show some kind of practical use out of it? Or, is he just taking established science and throwing his own flair on it by calling it different terms?
Let's look at ONE claim:
If you want to break water down into its constituents, you need only add beryllium or its 'tone'.
This is demonstrably false; beryllium does not react with water. So what the flying fuck is he talking about? Just stay on ONE topic for more than a few moments and you start to notice that he's really good at saying bullshit to people who don't know what the fuck he is talking about and it makes him seem smart.
Kindergartener here: he makes complete sense
Genius is often misunderstood
So is insanity.
That’s fine, this man is a moron though
What is the probability ? Madman or Genius. He sure produces a lot of words.
Genius: 0.00 - 0.01%
Madman: 99.99 - 100%
I don't need empirical proof as Terrence doesn't need that either in a scientific paradigm that's dominated by empiricism.
This is pretty mind blowing😂😂
Terrance is correct. Math and science is gay.
When Howard Lattimer improved the lightbulb im sure they thought he was crazy too… all inventions and NEW theories make ppl look crazy because it’s not often that human beings see a brand new idea that never existed before
I wonder what will happen if we locked him in a room by himself with nothing but boxes, a bunch of square boxes.
Builds a forte
I'm not sure if I stepped on something but it smells like bullplop in here, "rub that salt and chlorine on your skin, to make them good oils" I'll remember that next time I am in some trenches and get mustard gasses 🤣
Man got Jamie flustered
5:45 Beryllium does not react with water at all
It turns it into oxygen! Limitless scuba tanks! Interstellar travel! Problem Solved!
@@JeffPDX1 I know you’re joking, but just really want to emphasize that Beryllium does not react with water to make oxygen. It doesn’t react with water at all.
Its bariumnot berrelyium
@@diperman he clearly says Beryllium at 5:15
And in fact it is a practice to submerge beryllium when cutting it to mitigate the dust.
The periodicity is arranged by proton number. It is not intended to encapsulate every quality of atom. If this guy wasn’t an actor he’d be scrubbing floors and talking to passersby about his theory of everything
Socrates, Hypatia of Alexandria, Giordano Bruno, Michael Servetus, Galileo- all persecuted, some even burned at the stake for their beliefs against the institutions that stood in their time. Easy to make fun, but back then- all the people listed above sounded crazy- now they’re considered some of the greatest philosophers in history.
So being ridiculded and told you're wrong is a sign that you are actually right?
But they have experimental data to show they are correct.
Except they contributed knowledge. Terry’s contribution is a dipshit claim about 1x1 that makes no sense and everything else he says he stole from another hack
We must keep this man alive at all cost! He is and should be a national treasure.
Nah
He’s not for you! St2pid
Get Bob Lazar and Elon Musk on with him next time
Lay off meth kids. He doesn't have a doctorate in chemical engineering. The college he went too doesn't give a doctorate for chemical engineering. He's full of dung.
He's TONE... COLD crazy...
Yep.
I guarantee you don't even know half of what he's saying
@@elliotpolanco159 I guarantee I do troll...
@@elliotpolanco159 Terrance Howard doesn't know half the stuff he is saying. Joe doesn't know anything he is saying, haha.
Joe like... Dafuq
The man has a valid point.
Past philosophers and scientists were burned at stake for such 'breaking away from that which is acceptable and established.'
The secular world is scared shitless of a new and different level of progressive science that is "UNCONFORMED."
No he doesn’t, you’re just the kind of mark that swallows this nonsense up
This man needs some serious help. Like full on delulu
don't stop, that was mind blowing
I’m pretty sure his theory that rubbing salt on you after swimming does anything to neutralize chlorine
Wait what the fuck ? Are you for real ?
What jacket is that?! I need it in my life...
A sukajan (スカジャン), or a souvenir jacket, is a type of blouse jacket dating from the end of the Second World War. It is inspired by baseball jackets, and it uses embroidery, silk and Japanese influences (wikipedia)
@@TrainYourBrain621 Thank you very kindly! I've seen them before but was unaware of the actual name.. can't wait to get me one. Thanks again!
@@sigmaslaughter1441 you're welcome. Looks rad!
He means silicon not silicone !
Nope it’s silicone, he’s reinventing the table
@@wheres_bears1378 I don’t even know where to start with this… it’s silicon, not silicone, ffs. Silicones are a type of polymer. Silicon is a chemical element with an atomic number of 14, since its atoms have 14 protons. You’ve literally just proved that you have no idea why silicon is considered an element, when it’s one of the most basic things that you get taught about in your first few chemistry lessons. With a knowledge base like that, no wonder you take this narcissist’s word as gospel.
@@aguyonasiteontheinternetI stand corrected and you are correct 👍 thanks for the correction …… clearly I was being sarcastic 😉 I guess you can’t teach humour in a classroom, so you’re forgiven 😂 to be fair though I should have put the laughing emoji to indicated that my bad
I want to see Terrence, Kat, and Kanye do a podcast together. My ears are bleeding just thinking about it.
That's it for today, class. See you after my next dream
This is cruel, Joe. You are setting this guy up for humiliation.
He is this generations Einstein
This one byte makes want to watch the whole thing
He clearly knows what he's talking about; we just can't understand him right now. That's okay, everyone. Neil deGrasse Tyson is one of the smartest people on the planet, but if he couldn't simplify and explain his brilliance to us, we wouldn't get it either. Thankfully, he's really good at doing that.
Neil is nothing but a propagandist and not even that smart. He thinks men can be women and other way around.
Yes. Thankfully. The world needs more of his input.
Just because someone knows a lot about something doesn’t mean that something is right. The ideas here make almost zero sense if you understand basic chemistry.
Genius genius genius finally show it ...
This is not science, not even "science fiction". And the body can easily distinguish nitrogen and arsenic...
The crazy thing is that sonic waves are used in weapons and medical treatment
When you don't understand the periodic table, this is what you get!
I wonder if TH thinks Joe knows what he's talking bout
Keep him talking Joe!
He makes the connection between atomic structure, frequencies of light, spectrum and sound.
Not unlike making the connection between spirits, the weather and punishing witches.
Nah he really doesn’t