Is there a way we can find the coefficient of drag of an object using the damped simple harmonic motion??? I have a lab report and I really need some help
Hello sir, When explaining overdamping, you say that the mass will go back to the equilibrium very slowly. However, then you continue to mention that the stronger B is, the quicker it will go back to equilibrium. Can you please confirm. Love your channel, many thanks!
I always wanted to ask this: I thought that the drag force is proportional to the square of the speed. Why do we set it directly proportional to the speed? Do we do that for simplification?
This is a very common source of confusion. When you suspend the object from the spring and allow it to come to rest, the force of gravity is negated by the force of the spring. When you now pull the object down a small distance and let go, the object will experience simply harmonic motion.
Hello why didn't you put the a=0 in this case as to before you did that since its in equilibrium it should be zero?? and why wasn't the gravity included???
No, we didn't set "a" equal to zero, but moved all the terms to one side of the equation algebraically and does you end up with zero on the other side.
I dont know what I would do without theses classes. Thank you teacher.
This guy is severely underated
Thank you.
Thanks a lot professor, that's verrrry helpful
I think this is one of the most interesting physics topics. thank you
Is there a way we can find the coefficient of drag of an object using the damped simple harmonic motion??? I have a lab report and I really need some help
Where can I find the mathematics behind the damping of a pendulum type tuned mass damper with explanations? Not a spring-mass one
This is Outstanding.....Thanks For This..
It helped, great thx, professor
very well explained, thank you so much
Hello sir,
When explaining overdamping, you say that the mass will go back to the equilibrium very slowly. However, then you continue to mention that the stronger B is, the quicker it will go back to equilibrium. Can you please confirm.
Love your channel, many thanks!
The comment was made in case of underdamping, if b is relatively large (but still allow underdamping) the oscillations will diminish quickly.
I always wanted to ask this:
I thought that the drag force is proportional to the square of the speed. Why do we set it directly proportional to the speed? Do we do that for simplification?
At slow velocities in a fluid we can approximate the damping factor as a linear relationship to its velocity.
You are wonderful!
sir why didn't you mention the force of gravity on the sum of the net force ?
This is a very common source of confusion. When you suspend the object from the spring and allow it to come to rest, the force of gravity is negated by the force of the spring. When you now pull the object down a small distance and let go, the object will experience simply harmonic motion.
yes yes i got it now thank you very much sir
you are the best
Sir kindly tell us how we can prove that in damping motion energy will be non conservative
Kindly reply us
Any time any kinetic energy (such as simple harmonic motion) converts to heat, it is non-conservative.
@@MichelvanBiezen thanks sir I wil ask some other question to u let me studying can u reply me when I wil ask questions
Thank you!
Hello why didn't you put the a=0 in this case as to before you did that since its in equilibrium it should be zero?? and why wasn't the gravity included???
No, we didn't set "a" equal to zero, but moved all the terms to one side of the equation algebraically and does you end up with zero on the other side.
thank you
Thanks
You are wolcome
Thanks much 🙏
You are very welcome
"One more thing..." Professor u r like Steve Jobs lol