Fun strat! Waylon already has a different take on it. Looks like you've got people thinking. That's exactly what the community needs. Nice going, Ken! Personally, I'm going to have to re-watch a few times because my first few tries have been pretty awful.
when you're on a real table, you don't get to check each one and replace it. therein lies the problem. you could write it down so you can keep up with it. otherwise you lose track and end up missing replacing it with the +1 unit. it does seem like a decent strategy.
Hmmm. Am i seeing rhis wrong. When youre hit on a hardway with multiple chips on it, the abacus doesnt accurately show how many youre down. Look at 17:25 for example. Not down 10, actually down 18. When you lose say 3 chips and go up to 4, that means youve already lost 1, then 2, then 3. Total of 6 lost yet your stack is at 4, meaning the abacus says youve lost only 3. Unless im understanding this wrong
Yes, you are correct. It's just a way to keep up so that any hard win recovers all. The way I calculate it is correct to a point. Then, you are right. It keeps me straight enough to assure that any hard hit wins it all back or at least most of it. Watching your rack is obviously the best way. Thanks.
KKG Nice job. I normally don’t play hard ways but it sure looks like fun. I think I’ll try it next time. Thanks.
You had me at Abacus.
Fun strat! Waylon already has a different take on it. Looks like you've got people thinking. That's exactly what the community needs. Nice going, Ken! Personally, I'm going to have to re-watch a few times because my first few tries have been pretty awful.
Lots of 7 outs with no hard will be brutal.
Waylon just did a tweak on this using a 5/9 ladder, turned out really good and he didn't throw all that many hardways.
I'll watch it soon. Thanks
Ken split screen, tech win
It's my inner John @Pro Craps
when you're on a real table, you don't get to check each one and replace it. therein lies the problem. you could write it down so you can keep up with it. otherwise you lose track and end up missing replacing it with the +1 unit. it does seem like a decent strategy.
That's why I suggested being as close to the stick as possible to see it. Otherwise, you have to do it in the rack.
@@Kenknowsgambling i missed the close to the stick suggestion due to my horrible hearing. doing it in the rack makes sense though.
Hmmm. Am i seeing rhis wrong. When youre hit on a hardway with multiple chips on it, the abacus doesnt accurately show how many youre down. Look at 17:25 for example. Not down 10, actually down 18. When you lose say 3 chips and go up to 4, that means youve already lost 1, then 2, then 3. Total of 6 lost yet your stack is at 4, meaning the abacus says youve lost only 3. Unless im understanding this wrong
Yes, you are correct. It's just a way to keep up so that any hard win recovers all. The way I calculate it is correct to a point. Then, you are right. It keeps me straight enough to assure that any hard hit wins it all back or at least most of it.
Watching your rack is obviously the best way.
Thanks.