I wish he made more of these, it's a small library but all the videos are awesome. The easiest method I've found to understanding GD&T and I've taken a few classes.
i've seen so many GD&T videos on you tube. No one has ever explained so simply and so fast. Dude, this is brilliant. Please do runouts next asap as i have interviews to attend!! :)
The videos are really good, you should keep producing more content. The fact that you also answer questions in the comments section is another great thing about the channel.
Hi there Edward Alexander! Thanks for watching and for engaging in the comments section! I know that takes a bit of effort. I do in fact plan on producing more content. In fact, just a little secret, I just purchased SOLIDWORKS from my local authorized reseller and I'm excited to get it installed. It's a great CAD package and the one I am most familiar with. I plan on incorporating CAD parts and assemblies into the videos to improve how I explain concepts. Also, thanks for the feedback on my answers to the comment section questions. That takes A LOT of time and effort but I feel the comments section is sort of the "classroom" where everyone should get to ask questions as GD&T is a very complex system to try to, not only understand, but practically apply to a design, machining, or inspection problem. I am going to try to start understanding a little better who is watching and what their technical needs are. With that in mind, if you get a few seconds, could you reply and let me know what job you do and how GD&T is part of your work? Thanks again for watching and commenting! I hope to see you around in other video comments sections! Have a great day and stay safe and healthy!
@@StraightToThePointEngineering Yes, I can imagine writing in the comments, can be time consuming. I am an engineering PhD student, my thesis required a fair amount of design work for new experimental equipment, a lot of the parts needed to mate together in a way that everything was close to parallel and perpendicular to each other, which has been the main reason for using GD and T but also using GD and T for hole call outs is so much better than the traditional method.
I am new to this channel and I must appreciate your simple teaching and creative presentation style. There is not much visual material available on TH-cam to learn GD&T. Your channel is truly providing some valuable information to people working in the design and manufacturing industries. Thank you for sharing your knowledge and for your efforts. Have a good day. :)
Simple and Straight to the Point - I enjoy and love your videos. Great job. I believe you INVEST a lot of time in creating Simplicity. Keep it up and God Bless your talent
Hello Nevz Album (interesting username...) Thanks for much for watching the video and for taking some time to comment. I do invest quite a bit of time and mental energy into creating content that I feel breaks down the complex, theoretical GD&T concepts into more manageable and applied bite size bits. Thanks again for watching and make sure to safe and healthy. Have a great day!
I loved that you explained 'why to mimic the squared (traditional) tolerance zone. Most of the traditional (and may be modern) machine move in linear up and down direction; so square shape tolerance. Secondly, +/- 5 is very commonly used tolerance.
Hi there yosin8! I just uploaded a new one and I am planning on uploading on a much more regular basis! Thanks for watching and for the support! Stay safe and healthy!
Thanks for the "Great Video" on the foundations of the Plus-Minus System VS. GD&T System (ASME-Y14.5). This is one of the best introductions for a beginning-GD&T industry standard. THANKS so MUCH! T J (Tom) Vanderloop, Author, Technology Instructor & Industry Consultant, AWS & LSME Memberships-leader
Hello Mr. Vanderloop! I'm glad you felt this was a worthy comparison of Limit Tolerancing vs. GD&T. It is sometimes hard to convey, not only the rules and concepts of GD&T, but why GD&T is a useful and practical tool. Thanks again for dropping by and leaving some kinds words of encouragement! Stay safe and healthy!
@@StraightToThePointEngineering Can we "Talk-shop" on GD&T? you have my TH-cam contact. Go to my webpage: google-search at; Thomas Vanderloop, I teach print reading. (Great video Instructions)
Hi Joel! It was a particular point of frustration for me as well! I am not a "rule of thumb" kinda guy or a "because I said so" kind of guy. Instead, I am the type of person who likes to know why. Glad this video helped and I appreciate your multiple comments across several of the videos! Have a great day!
Hey STTP, I always liked the traditional whiteboard presentations, but I have to say the new format was very good. I enjoyed the video, keep up the great work.
Hello HMCV CDJ! Not sure that's what your friends call you but I can dig it! ;) First, thanks for participating in the comments section! I definitely appreciate the kind words and the feedback! I moved to the TV with slides to de-clutter the whiteboard which was getting too full of information and felt like it was becoming a distraction. Just a heads up, I just personally purchased a SOLIDWORKS license from my local authorized reseller and so I plan on incorporating more CAD parts and assemblies into the videos to improve the learning experience. One thing, I am going to try to start understanding a little better who is watching and what their technical needs are. With that in mind, if you get a few seconds, could you reply and let me know what job you do and how GD&T is part of your work or passions? Thanks again for watching and commenting! Stay safe and healthy and have a wonderful day!
Yesterday I saw for the first time your channel, it's incredible! I know it's not easy to keep it going but the work invested in all your videos y excellent. Well explained (for non english speakers like myself) and easy to the eye. New format: easy for you to prepare and can have more info in slides. Old format: colors. :)
Hi Changoyan! I'm glad you are enjoying the content! It is hard work to prepare the content as well as try to figure out the best way to verbally explain the concepts in way that people can easily understand and relate to. Also, thanks for the feedback on the new format. FYI, just a little secret, I just personally purchased a SOLIDWORKS license through my local authorized SOLIDWORKS reseller. I am planning on improving the content and will begin to incorporate CAD into the videos to help people grasp the concepts a little better. GD&T is a difficult topic and can become very theoretical very quickly. I want to make sure I keep it practical and applied for everyone to be able to start using it on their designs. Again, thank you for watching and participating in the comments section and I look forward to hearing from you in the other video comment sections as well! Have a wonderful day!
The new format is good but the point is that you are clear and fluent at this subject. At the moment I'm taking an Udemy course about GD&T and have learned that there are so many things to learn and this subject is an academic one. Please prepare more sophisticated point videos about the subject. Some other gays are working on this subject but you are a native speaker so your accent isn't irritating and fluent. Thank you.
Just starting to learn about GD&T. I've been watching vids all over youtube. I love the straight to the point move. I don't have to skip through your video to find the actual info, which is nice. One piece of feedback, you mention in this video there is another video coming soon that explains how to convert traditional rectangular tol zone into a gd&t tol zone but I can't find that vid. Some links in the description would be nice for clarification.
Mr. E. RambleOn...first, that's quite a call-sign you've got. I'll be honest, I try my best to not do exactly that in my videos all for the viewers benefit. Anyway, thanks for watching and providing the very kind words! I do completely agree with you. Every time I go to create the video content, I am diving deep into my GD&T standard and reviewing/re-learning the concepts to ensure I am presenting correct information. I feel a definite duty to the viewers to send them down the correct path. I am not perfect but I give it 100%! Thanks again for watching and know that I will be posting new videos here soon. Stay safe and healthy and have fun if you can!
Jumps right into with real numbers I can use. Sure - someday I need to start at the beginning of a text book and understand everthing about GD&T, but I've got parts I need to finish this week.
I have a question on why position is used not cylindricity on a hole? I would think guiding it by the axis thru is better than only the surface position. Thanks for the quick videos!
Great point, because the definition is "...the cylindrical tolerance volume zone of the hole axis..." Now, think of how it is actually measured? a.) Pin gage that fits the hole b.) Pin gage must also "sit flat/square" to the inspection plate....or [datum A] as specified in the geometric control frame. Since, the pin gage must sit square = the pin gage is perpendicular to the hole feature = hole axis is perpendicular = becomes a simple 2D situation. Now, there is no need for a 3D cylindrical tolerance zone. Since, "in practice" to get that hole dia & position we use "pin gage" and "inspection surface"...we will not capture any "skewed" axial positions. Hope that makes sense.
I like the way you explain. Its easy to understand. Is there any possibility you could explain us how to apply GD&T to a disposable syringe. It would be very helpful for me.
Hi Edgar Carrillo Vázquez! Thanks for watching and for sending your support in the comments section! FYI, I have uploaded another video. I am going to try to take everyone on a complete learn GD&T journey starting at the beginning and work our way through with my future videos. Thanks again for watching! Stay safe and healthy!
Very good presentation skills. Liked the arrangement. One question.. How to calculated the geometrical tolerance value for remaining geometrical characteristics? Explain it one by one or make video of that.
Very nice, I’ve been working in medical as an ME for 4 years and in this specific position I was relegated to creating F.A.I and In-process criteria using the prints that have are supplied customers that use very little GD&T and ( I have been told by the principal ME) using it incorrectly. Money was good but I want to actually be what I got my degree for. This looks to be the best I seen to help me refresh and even improve my understanding. Doing you have a list of videos structure in chapter form progressing from start to finish?
I suspect that many engineers/designers don't understand positional tolerance. Quite often when I see it I find that they use .005 as a standard without realizing that it doesn't mean +/-.005" in XY but .0025" (or less) on XY. I often explain the tolerance as such, if you were to make the part and leave it in the machine and dial into the datum and them move to the true position, the tolerance would be represented as the total indicated runout you would see on the dial. So if the hole were out on one axis by .005" you would see .01" difference on the indicator.
Hi Adel Hodiwala! Thanks for watching! The various fixed fastener equation helps you solve for 1 of the 3 values which are the minimum clearance hole diameter, the position tolerance applied to the clearance hole, or the position tolerance applied to the threaded hole. The only thing is, you must first assume some reasonable values for 2 out of the 3 and then solve for third. That is where this video comes in. In this video I am suggesting that you assume a .014 positional tolerance for both the clearance hole and threaded hole that way you can use the fastener equation (as you have suggested) to solve for the third value which is the minimum clearance hole diameter. I feel this is the most practical way to approach this problem. I cover the fixed fastener calculation in two separate videos that show the 2 different ways to apply the fixed fastener equation. Here are the links to the videos: With Projected Tolerance Zone Applied: th-cam.com/video/5A8_0k9xaUI/w-d-xo.html Without Projected Tolerance Zone Applied: th-cam.com/video/bThrWWcMTvo/w-d-xo.html I hope this helps answer your question! Thanks again for watching and stay safe and healthy!
Very good job. Enjoying all of these. I have a request. Can you do a session on Profile of a surface? You can use this very broad general tool for many things. One thing I am a little unclear about is when and where do you reference to a datum reference frame with this control?? Thanks ahead of time. Greg Saiter
Hi GESSO SÃO MATEUS! Thank you for watching and for providing the uplifting words! I appreciate it. I was thinking about it, I would really like to start to know what jobs the folks who are watching the video perform? If you get a chance reply to this with what you do and if GD&T is part of that? Thanks in advance! Well, stay safe and healthy and have a great day!
Nice explanation sir.. Can u make video on stack up analysis having bilateral tolerance of feature like stepup shaft. Just want application based example. Thank you for your efforts sir.. Love from 🇮🇳 India
Hi, I have doubt on Positional tolerance when they are applied on length dimension..ex, a shaft with 10mm dia here OD is Datum B and one side face of the shaft is Datum A and other side face asked for 0.1mm position w.r.to A and B...and the length is 50mm basic dimension...Now what is teh tolerance to be applied for 50mm? Thanks in advance...if the question is not asked in clear... please give your mail id...I can mail you
It's awesome really, I like the concept of being straight to the point. You made it very simple and so understandable. Request you to tell us about controlled radius, projected tolerance & tangent plane as well.
Thanks for the sharing. I have a question, that .014 inches for the positioning tolerance, which is its equivalent for metric units? Thank you very much
Hi there Harwell Mejia! Thanks for watching for the great question! The short answer is that 0.36 mm is the common equivalent to .014 inches. Now for the longer answer. First, why list the tolerance to only two decimal places you might ask? To answer this, lets look at millimeter equivalents. 0.1 mm is roughly equal to .004 inches. This is not quite a small enough tolerance resolution to take advantage of the achievable tolerances with today's manufacturing equipment. We would like tolerance size increments that are just a bit smaller. So instead let's look at 0.01 mm. 0.01 mm is roughly equal to .0003 inches. This is the resolution we will use because it is a small enough resolution that makes sense for today's achievable manufacturing tolerances. So with this in mind, it makes sense that you will typically see metric tolerances stated to two decimal places. If you look at your ASME Y14.5 Dimensioning and Tolerancing standard, they list all of their tolerances to the two decimal place. Thanks again for watching and have a wonderful evening!
Hello there Neil Franciotti! First, thanks for watching and for providing the positive feedback here in the comments section. Second, I truly feel like we're all in the same boat. We're just trying to learn how to become better engineers/designers/machinists/inspectors so we can generate high-quality mechanical solutions while providing a better living for ourselves and our families. To that end, I hope you find the subject and the content useful! Once again, I appreciate your kind words! Have a wonderful day and stay safe and healthy out there!
Hello Oscar Javier Ornelas Chávez! Thanks for the positive comment! I am glad you found the information useful! A lot of my college success depended very heavily on extra clarifying information I could harvest from TH-cam and I think most students would agree. Thanks again for watching and stay safe and healthy!
Hey there Agustin! You are not the first person to ask for a tolerance stack-up video. Tolerance stack up is a very complex topic and will require quite a bit of material preparation and maybe a series of videos to go through one example. I will keep this in mind and try to develop over the next few months a walkthrough of a linear tolerance stackup analysis and maybe a positional stack up analysis example. In the meantime I think I want to get a bit more organized and present some shorter series of videos that start out explaining beginner GD&T concepts and work towards complex to help everyone from beginner to intermediate to expert levels in a controlled, logical sequence. I feel right now that the videos I am putting out right now do not necessarily have a good logical flow to them and are kind of random and so I want to fix that! Thanks for watching and participating in the comments section! Have a wonderful weekend!
I wish he made more of these, it's a small library but all the videos are awesome. The easiest method I've found to understanding GD&T and I've taken a few classes.
i've seen so many GD&T videos on you tube. No one has ever explained so simply and so fast. Dude, this is brilliant. Please do runouts next asap as i have interviews to attend!! :)
The videos are really good, you should keep producing more content. The fact that you also answer questions in the comments section is another great thing about the channel.
Hi there Edward Alexander! Thanks for watching and for engaging in the comments section! I know that takes a bit of effort. I do in fact plan on producing more content. In fact, just a little secret, I just purchased SOLIDWORKS from my local authorized reseller and I'm excited to get it installed. It's a great CAD package and the one I am most familiar with. I plan on incorporating CAD parts and assemblies into the videos to improve how I explain concepts. Also, thanks for the feedback on my answers to the comment section questions. That takes A LOT of time and effort but I feel the comments section is sort of the "classroom" where everyone should get to ask questions as GD&T is a very complex system to try to, not only understand, but practically apply to a design, machining, or inspection problem. I am going to try to start understanding a little better who is watching and what their technical needs are. With that in mind, if you get a few seconds, could you reply and let me know what job you do and how GD&T is part of your work? Thanks again for watching and commenting! I hope to see you around in other video comments sections! Have a great day and stay safe and healthy!
@@StraightToThePointEngineering Yes, I can imagine writing in the comments, can be time consuming. I am an engineering PhD student, my thesis required a fair amount of design work for new experimental equipment, a lot of the parts needed to mate together in a way that everything was close to parallel and perpendicular to each other, which has been the main reason for using GD and T but also using GD and T for hole call outs is so much better than the traditional method.
Many thanks to you, sir. I landed a job today, and your videos have been a great help.
I am new to this channel and I must appreciate your simple teaching and creative presentation style. There is not much visual material available on TH-cam to learn GD&T. Your channel is truly providing some valuable information to people working in the design and manufacturing industries. Thank you for sharing your knowledge and for your efforts. Have a good day. :)
no one can explain better than you...GDNT master..god bless you
Awesome video! I’m learning this for my new job. Using this to reinforce what I’m learning each day.
Simple and Straight to the Point - I enjoy and love your videos. Great job. I believe you INVEST a lot of time in creating Simplicity. Keep it up and God Bless your talent
Hello Nevz Album (interesting username...) Thanks for much for watching the video and for taking some time to comment. I do invest quite a bit of time and mental energy into creating content that I feel breaks down the complex, theoretical GD&T concepts into more manageable and applied bite size bits. Thanks again for watching and make sure to safe and healthy. Have a great day!
I loved that you explained 'why to mimic the squared (traditional) tolerance zone.
Most of the traditional (and may be modern) machine move in linear up and down direction; so square shape tolerance. Secondly, +/- 5 is very commonly used tolerance.
such a shame he stopped uploading videos, he is a really good teacher, i had so many questions.... :(
I like the new production style! Keep up the good work
I'm relatively new to GD&T but your explanation is clear and helpful. Thanks!
Thank you sir! please to continually uploade this kind of knowledge,it is truly helpfuul for me!
Hi man we really miss your great videos.. Hope you share some new ones out there soon
Hi there yosin8! I just uploaded a new one and I am planning on uploading on a much more regular basis! Thanks for watching and for the support! Stay safe and healthy!
Thank you so much! This hasn't been explained this easily anywhere else!
Thanks for the video. I'm a mechanical Design Eng. I will recommend this channel to my boys at work it's great and simple ... Keep up the good work.
You should do a video on composite tolerances! You have the best GDT videos on TH-cam, I just wish there were more!!
I love STTP videos.I wished someone had taught me years before the way you do.
Thanks for Great work!
i love this channel omg strait to the point. god bless you bro.
one of the best GD&T video's I've seen. thank you
Good 👍 knowledge about gd & t..
Thanks for the "Great Video" on the foundations of the Plus-Minus System VS. GD&T System (ASME-Y14.5). This is one of the best introductions for a beginning-GD&T industry standard. THANKS so MUCH!
T J (Tom) Vanderloop, Author, Technology Instructor & Industry Consultant, AWS & LSME Memberships-leader
Hello Mr. Vanderloop! I'm glad you felt this was a worthy comparison of Limit Tolerancing vs. GD&T. It is sometimes hard to convey, not only the rules and concepts of GD&T, but why GD&T is a useful and practical tool. Thanks again for dropping by and leaving some kinds words of encouragement! Stay safe and healthy!
@@StraightToThePointEngineering Can we "Talk-shop" on GD&T?
you have my TH-cam contact. Go to my webpage: google-search at; Thomas Vanderloop, I teach print reading. (Great video Instructions)
Thanks for this. This was the source of my frustration with GD&T in the beginning.
Hi Joel! It was a particular point of frustration for me as well! I am not a "rule of thumb" kinda guy or a "because I said so" kind of guy. Instead, I am the type of person who likes to know why. Glad this video helped and I appreciate your multiple comments across several of the videos! Have a great day!
Hey STTP, I always liked the traditional whiteboard presentations, but I have to say the new format was very good. I enjoyed the video, keep up the great work.
Awesome. Huge help for me. Thank you for putting this video up!
First of all, thanks for sharing your knowledge. Your new format is excellent.
Hello HMCV CDJ! Not sure that's what your friends call you but I can dig it! ;) First, thanks for participating in the comments section! I definitely appreciate the kind words and the feedback! I moved to the TV with slides to de-clutter the whiteboard which was getting too full of information and felt like it was becoming a distraction. Just a heads up, I just personally purchased a SOLIDWORKS license from my local authorized reseller and so I plan on incorporating more CAD parts and assemblies into the videos to improve the learning experience. One thing, I am going to try to start understanding a little better who is watching and what their technical needs are. With that in mind, if you get a few seconds, could you reply and let me know what job you do and how GD&T is part of your work or passions? Thanks again for watching and commenting! Stay safe and healthy and have a wonderful day!
Yesterday I saw for the first time your channel, it's incredible! I know it's not easy to keep it going but the work invested in all your videos y excellent. Well explained (for non english speakers like myself) and easy to the eye. New format: easy for you to prepare and can have more info in slides. Old format: colors. :)
Hi Changoyan! I'm glad you are enjoying the content! It is hard work to prepare the content as well as try to figure out the best way to verbally explain the concepts in way that people can easily understand and relate to. Also, thanks for the feedback on the new format. FYI, just a little secret, I just personally purchased a SOLIDWORKS license through my local authorized SOLIDWORKS reseller. I am planning on improving the content and will begin to incorporate CAD into the videos to help people grasp the concepts a little better. GD&T is a difficult topic and can become very theoretical very quickly. I want to make sure I keep it practical and applied for everyone to be able to start using it on their designs. Again, thank you for watching and participating in the comments section and I look forward to hearing from you in the other video comment sections as well! Have a wonderful day!
Awesome videos, easy to understand and right to the point as the name of your channel suggests!
This new format is simply amazing and thank you for the explaining !! Im so glad I've discovered this page
Thanks from México, you are so clear in your explanations.
This is better formula. You now have easier to prepare. Great job!!
Presentation is very clear thank you! I'm new to GD&T and your series of videos are the most helpful.
Fantastic videos! The GD&T learning community wants more!
very straight to the point, simple, correct and very easy explanation. Thank you very much
Awating for next video ....😍
Video was straight to the point. Thumbs up
Best explaination sir. I was wandering to get this, now clear about deciding the value
I really DIG all of your videos. Keep them coming.
man,you
put your heart in explaining the subject,great
Absolutely enjoy your style. Bring information in a step by step, tell show, logical way...Thank you
You're very welcome Tracy! Thank you for watching!
The new format is good but the point is that you are clear and fluent at this subject. At the moment I'm taking an Udemy course about GD&T and have learned that there are so many things to learn and this subject is an academic one. Please prepare more sophisticated point videos about the subject. Some other gays are working on this subject but you are a native speaker so your accent isn't irritating and fluent. Thank you.
Just starting to learn about GD&T. I've been watching vids all over youtube. I love the straight to the point move. I don't have to skip through your video to find the actual info, which is nice. One piece of feedback, you mention in this video there is another video coming soon that explains how to convert traditional rectangular tol zone into a gd&t tol zone but I can't find that vid. Some links in the description would be nice for clarification.
Great explanation I have ever had about position tolerance! Keep up the good work Man👍😀. Subscribed already!!
Currently working with the new TP callouts. I like it.
Love your videos. Extremely helpful with my work. Please keep up the good work and more videos would be terrific. Thank you!
Awesome video. New to the channel and wondering if you have or could make videos about the space machining industry standards or tolerance????
Hi everybody, the way to know GD&T tolerance is if you have a square .010 just multiply by 1.4142 =.014. (1.4142 came from a square root of 2)
Teaching is about learning concepts. You are genius at delivering it. Thank you.
Mr. E. RambleOn...first, that's quite a call-sign you've got. I'll be honest, I try my best to not do exactly that in my videos all for the viewers benefit. Anyway, thanks for watching and providing the very kind words! I do completely agree with you. Every time I go to create the video content, I am diving deep into my GD&T standard and reviewing/re-learning the concepts to ensure I am presenting correct information. I feel a definite duty to the viewers to send them down the correct path. I am not perfect but I give it 100%! Thanks again for watching and know that I will be posting new videos here soon. Stay safe and healthy and have fun if you can!
Jumps right into with real numbers I can use. Sure - someday I need to start at the beginning of a text book and understand everthing about GD&T, but I've got parts I need to finish this week.
That new display looks a lot more versatile than the whiteboard. Good idea!
crisp and to the point mate keep going
Great format Sir!!! Thank You from India!!!
I have a question on why position is used not cylindricity on a hole? I would think guiding it by the axis thru is better than only the surface position. Thanks for the quick videos!
Great point, because the definition is "...the cylindrical tolerance volume zone of the hole axis..."
Now, think of how it is actually measured?
a.) Pin gage that fits the hole
b.) Pin gage must also "sit flat/square" to the inspection plate....or [datum A] as specified in the geometric control frame.
Since, the pin gage must sit square = the pin gage is perpendicular to the hole feature = hole axis is perpendicular = becomes a simple 2D situation.
Now, there is no need for a 3D cylindrical tolerance zone.
Since, "in practice" to get that hole dia & position we use "pin gage" and "inspection surface"...we will not capture any "skewed" axial positions.
Hope that makes sense.
I like the way you explain. Its easy to understand. Is there any possibility you could explain us how to apply GD&T to a disposable syringe. It would be very helpful for me.
Simple, to the point, well explained and defined. Thank you for the great video.
*Straight to the point.
5:27 i love your videos man, i really want to see your next video
Hi Edgar Carrillo Vázquez! Thanks for watching and for sending your support in the comments section! FYI, I have uploaded another video. I am going to try to take everyone on a complete learn GD&T journey starting at the beginning and work our way through with my future videos. Thanks again for watching! Stay safe and healthy!
@@StraightToThePointEngineering Thank you thank you... Tha k you so so so much... I can not wait to see your next videos
STTP .... Much interested presentation makes you special explanator in youtube. Thanks alot for sharing this wonderful knowledge.
Hi there Naveen! I appreciate the positive feedback! Keep tuned as I will post new content soon!
Very good presentation skills. Liked the arrangement.
One question.. How to calculated the geometrical tolerance value for remaining geometrical characteristics?
Explain it one by one or make video of that.
Very nice, I’ve been working in medical as an ME for 4 years and in this specific position I was relegated to creating F.A.I and In-process criteria using the prints that have are supplied customers that use very little GD&T and ( I have been told by the principal ME) using it incorrectly. Money was good but I want to actually be what I got my degree for. This looks to be the best I seen to help me refresh and even improve my understanding.
Doing you have a list of videos structure in chapter form progressing from start to finish?
These videos are great! Please make more!
I suspect that many engineers/designers don't understand positional tolerance. Quite often when I see it I find that they use .005 as a standard without realizing that it doesn't mean +/-.005" in XY but .0025" (or less) on XY. I often explain the tolerance as such, if you were to make the part and leave it in the machine and dial into the datum and them move to the true position, the tolerance would be represented as the total indicated runout you would see on the dial. So if the hole were out on one axis by .005" you would see .01" difference on the indicator.
we missing your videos, please come back and teach us more on GD&T
ThNk you I’m just learning this now great job
Very easy to follow. Thank you
Easy to understand and very clear explanation.
Hey there Fernando, I appreciate your positive feedback! It makes the hard work very much worth it. Stay tuned as I will post new content soon!
really nice video. Wouldn't the fastener equation work just as well?
Hi Adel Hodiwala! Thanks for watching! The various fixed fastener equation helps you solve for 1 of the 3 values which are the minimum clearance hole diameter, the position tolerance applied to the clearance hole, or the position tolerance applied to the threaded hole. The only thing is, you must first assume some reasonable values for 2 out of the 3 and then solve for third. That is where this video comes in. In this video I am suggesting that you assume a .014 positional tolerance for both the clearance hole and threaded hole that way you can use the fastener equation (as you have suggested) to solve for the third value which is the minimum clearance hole diameter. I feel this is the most practical way to approach this problem. I cover the fixed fastener calculation in two separate videos that show the 2 different ways to apply the fixed fastener equation. Here are the links to the videos:
With Projected Tolerance Zone Applied: th-cam.com/video/5A8_0k9xaUI/w-d-xo.html
Without Projected Tolerance Zone Applied: th-cam.com/video/bThrWWcMTvo/w-d-xo.html
I hope this helps answer your question! Thanks again for watching and stay safe and healthy!
Very nice explanation and in easy to understand language. Thank you!!
Can I see next video explain how to convert rectangular tolerance to get diameter 0.014? Thanks
Couldn't be better so far 👍
Man take a breath!!! Well done 👍🏻 keep going
Thank you dude!Can you recommend any advanced GD&T course which would bring me to the level of knowledge I need in the industry?
Your videos are so informative, this video is so helpful, waiting for your next video
Great explanation. Clear and concise
Very good job. Enjoying all of these. I have a request. Can you do a session on Profile of a surface? You can use this very broad general tool for many things. One thing I am a little unclear about is when and where do you reference to a datum reference frame with this control?? Thanks ahead of time.
Greg Saiter
Is there a rule that value of position tolerance needs to be smaller than size tolerance of the hole ?
I learn so quickly with little time thanks to this man!
The new format is easy to follow, and I'm predicting some Pythagorean theorem in the next video.
The Best explanation ever !
Hi GESSO SÃO MATEUS! Thank you for watching and for providing the uplifting words! I appreciate it. I was thinking about it, I would really like to start to know what jobs the folks who are watching the video perform? If you get a chance reply to this with what you do and if GD&T is part of that? Thanks in advance! Well, stay safe and healthy and have a great day!
5:28 I am still waiting for your nex video teacher, i really love your videos
easy and clear with a great example. nice
Nice explanation sir.. Can u make video on stack up analysis having bilateral tolerance of feature like stepup shaft. Just want application based example. Thank you for your efforts sir.. Love from 🇮🇳 India
Hi, I have doubt on Positional tolerance when they are applied on length dimension..ex, a shaft with 10mm dia here OD is Datum B and one side face of the shaft is Datum A and other side face asked for 0.1mm position w.r.to A and B...and the length is 50mm basic dimension...Now what is teh tolerance to be applied for 50mm?
Thanks in advance...if the question is not asked in clear... please give your mail id...I can mail you
Could you help me to understand feature control frame
Please make a video on this topic in details
kindly make a video on how to calculate runout tolerances and exact location of tolerace zone
It's awesome really, I like the concept of being straight to the point. You made it very simple and so understandable.
Request you to tell us about controlled radius, projected tolerance & tangent plane as well.
Thanks for the sharing.
I have a question, that .014 inches for the positioning tolerance, which is its equivalent for metric units?
Thank you very much
Hi there Harwell Mejia! Thanks for watching for the great question! The short answer is that 0.36 mm is the common equivalent to .014 inches. Now for the longer answer. First, why list the tolerance to only two decimal places you might ask? To answer this, lets look at millimeter equivalents. 0.1 mm is roughly equal to .004 inches. This is not quite a small enough tolerance resolution to take advantage of the achievable tolerances with today's manufacturing equipment. We would like tolerance size increments that are just a bit smaller. So instead let's look at 0.01 mm. 0.01 mm is roughly equal to .0003 inches. This is the resolution we will use because it is a small enough resolution that makes sense for today's achievable manufacturing tolerances. So with this in mind, it makes sense that you will typically see metric tolerances stated to two decimal places. If you look at your ASME Y14.5 Dimensioning and Tolerancing standard, they list all of their tolerances to the two decimal place. Thanks again for watching and have a wonderful evening!
@@StraightToThePointEngineering Thanks a lot, I will check the ASME Y14.5 .
I really enjoy your courses.
Hi, would you interested to upload the second part of this video? It will be very helpful to be clea the concepts. Best wishes for you.
Try to make more videos on runout tolerance and btw your new format is great!!
Saw your other video.. cleared my doubts that I got here✌️
Thank you for speaking slowly for us dumb engineers!!
Best content on the subject on the internet.
Hello there Neil Franciotti! First, thanks for watching and for providing the positive feedback here in the comments section. Second, I truly feel like we're all in the same boat. We're just trying to learn how to become better engineers/designers/machinists/inspectors so we can generate high-quality mechanical solutions while providing a better living for ourselves and our families. To that end, I hope you find the subject and the content useful! Once again, I appreciate your kind words! Have a wonderful day and stay safe and healthy out there!
I like the new format. Thumbs up from me!
Your lesson is very easy to understand
Please make more video.
Create a full course please
this format is great thank you
His new video isn't out yet :/
Wonderful Lectures ! Thanks.
Very useful info for college. Thanks a lot
Hello Oscar Javier Ornelas Chávez! Thanks for the positive comment! I am glad you found the information useful! A lot of my college success depended very heavily on extra clarifying information I could harvest from TH-cam and I think most students would agree. Thanks again for watching and stay safe and healthy!
Great video. Now only if you could do a metric one for us non US folks
You are probably busy but a tolerance stack-up video would be awesome!
Hey there Agustin! You are not the first person to ask for a tolerance stack-up video. Tolerance stack up is a very complex topic and will require quite a bit of material preparation and maybe a series of videos to go through one example. I will keep this in mind and try to develop over the next few months a walkthrough of a linear tolerance stackup analysis and maybe a positional stack up analysis example. In the meantime I think I want to get a bit more organized and present some shorter series of videos that start out explaining beginner GD&T concepts and work towards complex to help everyone from beginner to intermediate to expert levels in a controlled, logical sequence.
I feel right now that the videos I am putting out right now do not necessarily have a good logical flow to them and are kind of random and so I want to fix that! Thanks for watching and participating in the comments section! Have a wonderful weekend!
Any formula for defining Dia 0.14?
That's great effort sir,please upload based on gd&t more