A Huge Myth About Feminism and the Working Woman

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @apidas
    @apidas หลายเดือนก่อน

    may god bless us all with the world takes direction

  • @RocKnight11
    @RocKnight11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My goodness, you are making very broad (and false) generalizations of what feminism is about. Sure, women had jobs, but not necessarily the jobs they desire.
    Feminists fight for women to have choices in their lives. To choose choose their career paths. To have a choice to marry who they love regardless of gender. Feminists also fight for women to have a voice, to have reproduction rights, property rights, and to choose to divorce their abusive husbands. If it wasn't for feminism, you wouldn't have the voice or choices you have now.
    If you examine how men in the redPiII community talk about women, you'll understand that feminism is more important now than ever.

    • @ellianna.keller
      @ellianna.keller  หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I never said to go towards the red pill or that there weren't beneficial aspects of feminism. HOWEVER, to say women didn't have jobs before feminism is false and that's what I was addressing in this video

    • @aelitastone5629
      @aelitastone5629 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ellianna.keller Women allways worked, but that NOT feminism that lied. That concervatism and "tradition". Feminism started in a period where women was excluded of work and right, so it was true that they didn't work back them in this time, at least far less. But it was concervatism and the idea of traditional gender role that lied because it was just a new model of life for hight class population. And you just need to look, who will talk the most about the gender role ? Not feminism actually. Feminism criticize the fact that women was prived of their right wich is true. But that the others that lied about women conditions in the whole history for justifying their exclusion by saying they never worked and that why workplace became so bad blablabla (when in fact again, they allways worked).

    • @JoelHannock
      @JoelHannock หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I cant tell if you're being ironic. But I'll bite. "Sure, women had jobs, but not necessarily the jobs they desire" you think men throughout history have just been able to choose whatever career struck their fancy? No. Socio economic factors determined your lifes trajectory and to a lesser degree still do today. A man born into a working class family has through the majority of history had little to no say in what jobs are available to him. Menial labour was his lot in life. Just going to point out that your take is milk toast and your brand of feminism died with the tumblr green hairs.

    • @RocKnight11
      @RocKnight11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@JoelHannock
      Oh, please, men were still able to open bank accounts, own property, and have their own businesses. So their menial labor still benefited them. What is the point of women's menial labor if they weren't able to own property and open bank accounts?

    • @JoelHannock
      @JoelHannock หลายเดือนก่อน

      @RocKnight11 Your Anita Sarkeesian videos aren't historically accurate. Not far from me is a memorial dedicated to men who were shot dead by the army, whilst protesting the right to vote. Up until then, only landed gentry could vote, or women who had inherited land from family/deceased spouse. But always of the upper classes. The beauty of it is they got people like you fooled even hundreds of years later. Several wealthy men retained/retain all the wealth and power, and your solution to blame society and the people who are not responsible. I wonder why incredibly wealthy men help fund these cultural think tanks that endorse feminism? 🤔