Section 61 to 64 of Indian Evidence Act|| Primary Evidence|| Secondary Evidence|| go legal

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
  • Section 61 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
    61. Proof of contents of documents.-The contents of documents may be proved either by primary or by secondary evidence.
    62. Primary evidence
    Primary evidence means the documents itself produced for the inspection of the Court.
    Explanation 1-Where a document is executed in several parts, each part is primary evidence of the document :
    Where a document is executed in counterpart, each counterpart being executed by one or some of the parties only, each counterpart is primary evidence as against the parties executing it.
    Explanation 2- Where a number of documents are all made by one uniform process, as in the case of printing, lithography, or photography, each is primary evidence of the contents of the rest ; but, where they are all copies of a common original, they are not primary evidence of the contents of the original.
    Illustrations
    A person is shown to have been in possession of a number of placards, all printed at one time from one original. Any one of the placards is primary evidence of the contents of any other, but no one of them is primary evidence of the contents of the original.
    63. Secondary evidence
    Secondary evidence means and includes-
    (1) certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter contained;
    (2) Copies made from the original by mechanical processes which in themselves ensure the accuracy of the copy, and copies compared with such copies.
    (3) copies made from or compared with the original ;
    (4) counterparts of documents as against the parties who did not execute them;
    (5) oral accounts of the contents of a documents given by some person who has himself seen it.
    Illustration
    (a) A photograph of an original is secondary evidence of its contents, though the two have not been compared, if it is proved that the thing photographed was the original.
    (b) A copy compared with a copy of a letter made by a copying machine is secondary evidence of the contents of the letter, if it is shown that the copy made by the copying machine was made from the original.
    (c) A copy transcribed from a copy, but afterwards compared with the original, is secondary evidence; but he copy not so compared is not secondary evidence of the original, although the copy from which it was transcribed was compared with the original.
    (d) Neither an oral account of a copy compared with the original, nor an oral account of a photograph or machine copy of the original, is secondary evidence of the original.
    64. Proof of documents by primary evidence
    Documents must be proved by primary evidence except in the cases hereinafter mentioned.
    Follow us on Instagram ...@Go.legal
    section 136 of Indian Evidence Act ... • Section 136 of Indian ...
    section 26 of SRA. • Rectification of Instr...
    Section 34 of SRA... • Section 34 SRA || TUTO...
    Section 20 of SRA... • Section 20 Specific Re...
    Section 31-33 of SRA... • section 31 - 33 of Spe...
    Section 138- 142 of Negotiable Instrument Act.. • Section 138 - 142 of N...
    Double Jeopardy • Double Jeopardy || Aut...
    Criminal law amendment 2018 .. • The Criminal Law (Amen...
    Section 165 of Evidence Act.. • Section 165 of Indian ...
    Criminal Judgment writing ... • JUDGMENT WRITING || Tu...
    Section 313 of Cr.P.C..... • Section 313 of Crimina...
    Chhattisgarh Judicial Services Examination (pre) 2004 .... • Chhattisgarh Judicial ...
    Chhattisgarh Judicial services Examination (pre) 2003.... • Chhattisgarh Judicial ...
    Chhattisgarh judicial services examination 2008... • Chhattisgarh Judicial ...
    Chhattisgarh Civil Judge (pre) examination 2014... • Chhattisgarh Judicial ...
    Chhattisgarh Civil Judge (pre) examination 2016... • Chhattisgarh Civil Jud...
    Preventive Relief Under Specific Relief Act ... • Preventive Relief || T...
    thank you...

ความคิดเห็น • 56