In Play 5, I agree with you that with less than 5 seconds, it would be logical to just let the clock run out. However, if you put a whistle on this, it should NOT be a delay of game warning, but rather a player technical foul as in the previous clip. Thanks for all you do for the game.
10-4-5b There are four instances where a delay of game warning is required. Batting the ball after a made shot, not having the court ready for play after a time out, touching the ball but not the thrower on a throw in, and a team huddle prior to a free throw. Other than those four, technical it is.
Just because an act delays the game, like the one in play #4, doesn't necessarily make it eligible for a warning. By rule, there are only the 4 reasons, as stated by Thomas Lyons, that fall in that category as defined in Rule 4 Section 47. As officials we do take some liberty at times, and as a courtesy, issue warnings for non warnable issues, simply to make a point. Even if this is done for as a preventative measure, it is important to know it is not an actual written rule.
That would be a great Venn diagram to use as a teaching tool for officials. When do the rules require a warning, when do the rules require a technical, and when do the rules allow for officials discretion?
The score is not the important piece of this ruling. It is the time left on the clock. If it's 5 seconds or less left, the violation should be ignored.
In Play 5, I agree with you that with less than 5 seconds, it would be logical to just let the clock run out. However, if you put a whistle on this, it should NOT be a delay of game warning, but rather a player technical foul as in the previous clip. Thanks for all you do for the game.
Thanks for watching.
Got four correct. The last play was the one that I got incorrect.
Great Job. Thank for watching.
same here on the last video, I got wrong.. I did not notice the situation of the contest.
Why does play #4 warrant a tech and not delay of game?
10-4-5b
There are four instances where a delay of game warning is required. Batting the ball after a made shot, not having the court ready for play after a time out, touching the ball but not the thrower on a throw in, and a team huddle prior to a free throw. Other than those four, technical it is.
Just because an act delays the game, like the one in play #4, doesn't necessarily make it eligible for a warning. By rule, there are only the 4 reasons, as stated by Thomas Lyons, that fall in that category as defined in Rule 4 Section 47. As officials we do take some liberty at times, and as a courtesy, issue warnings for non warnable issues, simply to make a point. Even if this is done for as a preventative measure, it is important to know it is not an actual written rule.
That would be a great Venn diagram to use as a teaching tool for officials. When do the rules require a warning, when do the rules require a technical, and when do the rules allow for officials discretion?
@@Panarchy9 on defending the throw in... touching the ball warrants a T, reaching across the vertical plane gets the warning
@@scottburkhardt6859 Good call, important distinction, you are right, thanks for the correction.
On #5 what if I am unsure of the score?
The score is not the important piece of this ruling. It is the time left on the clock. If it's 5 seconds or less left, the violation should be ignored.