Gabriela Hearst at COP27 - Fusion: Clean Energy for All

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 3

  • @ttmallard
    @ttmallard 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    All thermoelectricity has wasteheat/Mwh that's multiplied by greenhousing [1.7-aggi = 3.4× output], few generators trap or have no wasteheat.
    So, a 1500Mw plant emits 4800Mw of heat equivalent kept by the planet per second.
    1-Mw genset/container 50yr no_inputs warranty no CO2 H20 or wasteheat/Mwh superconducts coils.
    13-units are 12-Mw of 100%-DutyCyle Baseload in a parkinglot.
    No miles of wires, flip substations off_grid, power datacenters, remote villages, farms & more.
    Est.cost $1.6M/unit amortized $3.65/Mwh +(interest & upkeep) /month.
    Extraction-to-production no other source of usable torque comes close to sustainable.
    🕊⚖️♻️

  • @davidmarchand384
    @davidmarchand384 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    There’s no such thing as “clean” energy unfortunately regardless of how we see it… each source of energy as it’s own advantages and disadvantages.
    Presenting things this way it’s just only another greenwashing thingy that are by far too common these days 😢
    Nuclear fusion is part of it despite the promise of generating huge quantity of electricity in a safe and non invasive way in terms of greenhouse gas it’s also:
    1/ not ready at commercial level before 2100
    2/ electricity needed to start the fusion required is tremendous and will come from which source?
    3/ electricity to power cars as an example would mean that we will need to dig mines again everywhere for harvesting the cobalt, lithium,…
    Even though research and development of fusion should continue as this is great technology to have at some point.
    In the meantime what do we do?