Etabs 2016 vs Etabs v18 | Result Difference | IS 456:2000

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 พ.ค. 2020
  • #Etabs #Design_Result #IS_Code
    Watch if any result difference you may get or not in between Etabs v18 & Etabs 2016, if you get then how to solve it.
    Join as member to support this channel. Your support is our asset to give more effort. To be member click the link given below- / @decodebd
    --------------------------------------
    Related Tags:
    Etabs 2016 vs Etabs v18,difference between etabs 2016 and etabs v18,etabs 2016,etabs v18,IS Code,IS 456:2000,building design in Etabs,building design in Etabs v18,design in Etabs v18,design result in etabs v18,csi etabs,csi
    #etabs_results #csi_etabs #csi #etabs 2016 #etabs_v18 #building_design #IS_code
    #Click Here To Subscribe the Channel: th-cam.com/users/decodebd?su...
    #Checkout all playlists:
    th-cam.com/users/view_all_play...
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    LOVE YOU ALL MY VIEWERS & SUBSCRIBERS .
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ความคิดเห็น • 73

  • @kiranpradhan2806
    @kiranpradhan2806 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, your channel is one stop for Etabs. You are amazing. Thanks a lot.

  • @rosemaryjohnny5218
    @rosemaryjohnny5218 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey thanks again, Can you also make a video of multi storey steel building using IS codes? Would be highly appreciated!
    -Supporting your channel,always!!!

  • @mudassaralivloger3695
    @mudassaralivloger3695 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent work sir !!
    Please make a video for loading calculations for beam and slab .. please which load will come on slab and beam and how ..with drawing details please

  • @Abhishekkumar-ct9we
    @Abhishekkumar-ct9we 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir , please also make difference reinforcement detailing.(beam &column)

  • @sairamexcellent825
    @sairamexcellent825 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    B/C capacity ratio should calculate or not necessary what would you suggest ?

  • @koiralakoirala7711
    @koiralakoirala7711 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, I cannot modify the size of mesh for default meshing option in ETABS v18. Is there no such featue in v18 or i have done something wrong?

  • @engr.md.amirulislamsumon8903
    @engr.md.amirulislamsumon8903 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice and helpful tutorial. Thanks...
    Please make a tutorial of analysis and design taking the values of BNBC code at Etabs-18.

  • @everythingfromeverywhere1498
    @everythingfromeverywhere1498 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir is there any difference in analysis results in these two versions?

  • @nlaad13
    @nlaad13 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    in etabs 2018 there is no option for detailing which is there in 2016 version ...how to do the same??

  • @siddiqui7827
    @siddiqui7827 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please make video on shell and membrane....and how they effect on structural behaviour and economy

  • @shafirizaldi5139
    @shafirizaldi5139 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    bro, can you give me solution? why my etabs version 18 being (not responding) when me add coloum object to 10 storey. its my spec low? i use icore5 2 core 4 thread, ram 8gb,, nvidia 930mx and ssd 256 gb, how minimum requirement use etabs v18? thanks i hope u answer my question

  • @SankhaSubhraSaha
    @SankhaSubhraSaha 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir , i have a problem is that bottom story Ast is less than upper story so, how to fix this on etabs 16 as per IS CODE plase help me sir

  • @bikeshshrestha9424
    @bikeshshrestha9424 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU .

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are welcome!

  • @ilustraca
    @ilustraca 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much sir

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most welcome

  • @subhajitmukhopadhyay6709
    @subhajitmukhopadhyay6709 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    very useful

  • @madhavgunnal484
    @madhavgunnal484 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    which one is best etabs 19 or etabs 16 version

  • @engineermohammedsoyebbadgu3714
    @engineermohammedsoyebbadgu3714 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi...
    Should we consider Additional moment as per IS code or not while designing??
    And which case we must consider Additional moment,
    Please explain it...
    And Make more and more videos for us...
    Thanks 😊

  • @siddiqui7827
    @siddiqui7827 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please make detailed video on ductile detailing as per IS-13920-2016....(it's an request)

  • @sajidahmedsyed3256
    @sajidahmedsyed3256 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explaination

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Keep watching

  • @engrkaribul
    @engrkaribul 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, Sir. In ETABS 2018. No UBC 94 code is available. For BNBC 2006, which code shall we follow in ETABS 2018? It will really help if you let us know. Thank you again, Sir.

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      BNBC 2015 or 2017 is following ASCE 7-10 or ASCE 7-16 respectively.

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So now you have to be upgraded with new codes & new software.

  • @chinnajoyful
    @chinnajoyful 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which version is better 16 r 18...Please Tell Me...

  • @Abhishekkumar-ct9we
    @Abhishekkumar-ct9we 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was waiting for this video. Ie results difference between 16&18.

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All of you are my inspiration.

    • @alfredorojas4264
      @alfredorojas4264 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      cual es mejor?

  • @backtomovie5382
    @backtomovie5382 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What kind of Software to Analysis Dynamic Wind for Super tall building ?

  • @sajidahmedsyed3256
    @sajidahmedsyed3256 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good information

  • @rishabh6155
    @rishabh6155 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir do we need to select "yes" in design for the beam-column capacity ratio?

    • @ahhk8537
      @ahhk8537 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Design >> Concrete Frames Design Preferences

    • @arslanzemail
      @arslanzemail 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only in seismic zone 3 and 4

  • @imranmohiuddin968
    @imranmohiuddin968 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir, w.r.t IS :456 2000 , is it better to use that parameter of B/C capacity ratio in 18 version?
    Please explain that parameter.

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      B/C Capacity Ratio (Beam Column Capacity Ratio):
      Beam/column ratio is the ratio of beam capacity & column capacity to resist moment.Refer to section 21.6.2 of ACI 318-11, Sum of flexural capacities of column at a joint should be 1.2 times the capacities of beam framing into the joint in particular direction.
      As per clause 7.2 of IS 13920:2016, the ratio shall be at least 1.4.
      When capacity is exceeded, we can increase the size of column, or reduce the size of beam, or play with reinforcement of members. It has nothing to do with redistribution of moments.If both end of column will yield, during a seismic event, in a particular story, structure will most probably collapse. In a frame, that is resisting lateral loads, you cannot take away the ability of beam to develop negative moment(releasing beam ends). If you do so(releasing beam ends) then it will not be called a moment resisting frame, and will not resist lateral loads.

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      We have design B/C capacity ratio for special moment resisting frame.

    • @imranmohiuddin968
      @imranmohiuddin968 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Decodebd thank you for the reply sir.

  • @maheshtelange5132
    @maheshtelange5132 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice sir

  • @ronnie9096
    @ronnie9096 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative from software point of view but as per codal provision have to use IS 13920 if we use IS 1893-2002/2016. Correct me if I am wrong

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is for special moment resisting frame.

    • @ronnie9096
      @ronnie9096 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Decodebd if special moment resisting frame then no need for ductile detailing, is that what you mean sir ?.

  • @sairammudumba2164
    @sairammudumba2164 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the use of that beam column capacity ratio ?

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      B/C Capacity Ratio (Beam Column Capacity Ratio):
      Beam/column ratio is the ratio of beam capacity & column capacity to resist moment.Refer to section 21.6.2 of ACI 318-11, Sum of flexural capacities of column at a joint should be 1.2 times the capacities of beam framing into the joint in particular direction.
      As per clause 7.2 of IS 13920:2016, the ratio shall be at least 1.4.
      When capacity is exceeded, we can increase the size of column, or reduce the size of beam, or play with reinforcement of members. It has nothing to do with redistribution of moments.If both end of column will yield, during a seismic event, in a particular story, structure will most probably collapse. In a frame, that is resisting lateral loads, you cannot take away the ability of beam to develop negative moment(releasing beam ends). If you do so(releasing beam ends) then it will not be called a moment resisting frame, and will not resist lateral loads.

  • @yzn121
    @yzn121 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why CSI remove the UBC 97 Seimic Code from Etabs V.18 and is there any way to deal with this problem?

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Because UBC97 is very old, and its upgraded to ASCE 7-10, ASCE 7-16.

    • @yzn121
      @yzn121 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Decodebd THX alot for your replay & your efforts ..

  • @wondimagegnmolla5972
    @wondimagegnmolla5972 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you also compare Etabs version 20.3 to etabs version 16, version 20.3 beam result gives higher reinforcement results

  • @abhisheksen325
    @abhisheksen325 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir RCDC unable to import Etabs v18.1 how to solve?

    • @imranmohiuddin968
      @imranmohiuddin968 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      you need to install "Access database engine", then it will work.

    • @abinashpadhy2542
      @abinashpadhy2542 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@imranmohiuddin968 can u plz tell the procedure

  • @abdullahalzamil3268
    @abdullahalzamil3268 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear friend
    We hope to explain for us how to can use OAPI Method
    Thanks

  • @provasdebnath4129
    @provasdebnath4129 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you make a video on modeling stairs?

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/eK95D9nufFg/w-d-xo.html

  • @gowthamiv4841
    @gowthamiv4841 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    can you provide direct link to download ETABS V -18?? I'm using windows 10 cant install 16, 17 versions in etabs bcos of higer version of .NET requirement...

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You will get in "downloadly dot ir" or "lavteam dot org" website.

    • @gowthamiv4841
      @gowthamiv4841 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Decodebd reg. Dot net or Etabs??

  • @nurhossainridoy7891
    @nurhossainridoy7891 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the function of B/C capacity ratio
    Plz sir tell me

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      B/C Capacity Ratio (Beam Column Capacity Ratio):
      Beam/column ratio is the ratio of beam capacity & column capacity to resist moment.Refer to section 21.6.2 of ACI 318-11, Sum of flexural capacities of column at a joint should be 1.2 times the capacities of beam framing into the joint in particular direction.
      As per clause 7.2 of IS 13920:2016, the ratio shall be at least 1.4.
      When capacity is exceeded, we can increase the size of column, or reduce the size of beam, or play with reinforcement of members. It has nothing to do with redistribution of moments.If both end of column will yield, during a seismic event, in a particular story, structure will most probably collapse. In a frame, that is resisting lateral loads, you cannot take away the ability of beam to develop negative moment(releasing beam ends). If you do so(releasing beam ends) then it will not be called a moment resisting frame, and will not resist lateral loads.

    • @nurhossainridoy7891
      @nurhossainridoy7891 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Decodebd Thank u sir

  • @saikrishna-fy1jc
    @saikrishna-fy1jc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please provide full tutorial as per is 456 :2000 with detailing all Indians are wauting

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes, planning for this.

    • @maheshtelange5132
      @maheshtelange5132 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Decodebd pleas do it sir we are waiting

    • @shehzadattarwala9936
      @shehzadattarwala9936 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Assalamu-Alaikum Sir, please sir, we are egerly waiting for this.....

  • @abdulkadir-zd1ew
    @abdulkadir-zd1ew 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir how to contact you

  • @abhishekmaharishi9246
    @abhishekmaharishi9246 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir

    • @Decodebd
      @Decodebd  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Welcome

    • @dilipngangom4198
      @dilipngangom4198 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Since Etabs V18 checks for capacity design, do we still need to choose the size of columns so that Z values of columns are 1.2 times the Z values of beam to maintain the “stromg column-weak beam” concept in order not to form hinges in columns before beam fails?