Something you didn't mention : how the profits of corporations are internalized while the negative "externalities" of their operations are payed for by you and me, the taxpayer. The mere term "externality" is a slick and insidious, lawyer-ish ploy utilized by Big Money. Not to mention the "subsidies" we, the tax payer provide them as they rake in record profits!
Good point, but after listening to Mr. Wolff for sometime now, that goes without saying at this point. I call it the "Shxt Flows Downhill" Theory! Like in Palestine! Love the Wolff! However, this is not Capitalism... too big to fail...too big to jail. This is full blown fascism ... the merger of state and corporate powers! The Wolff is a very wise man and understands the manipulative power of Edward Bernays work on Public Relations. This before social media, but the principles remain similar. Humans are Herd Animals running out of Fertilizer and other Resources.
@@koahamtosoaham Which "GOD" is that? "GOD" is typically used by Humans to maintain faith in the Status Quo while providing for the ultimate form of plausible deniability. I agree with the 0.03 $ part though.
It's true. The most exploitative jobs I've ever had, not necessarily in the true Marxist sense of exploration (aka profit margin per hour extracted from the workers), but in terms of how hard they make you work and how much you get paid - have all been from small businesses. The least exploitative job I've had yet is my current unionized job working for a Fortune 500 corporation, because they are able to offer more and better benefits, and far better pay, in addition to being able to offer things like catered lunches and so on, and it's not because they want to be more humane than a small business, but rather because the corporation simply has far more money they can spend, and because they are more of a target for OSHA and the Department of Labor as an entity with large numbers of employees. People like Matt Stoller who act like the problem with capitalism is the problem of monopoly and oligopoly make the critical mistake in assuming that smaller businesses will be better for workers and consumers, when there is just no evidence of this. Perhaps product quality and prices would be better for consumers, but they would be no different for workers. This is why the Marxist perspective is invaluable.
I was just terminate that's how I call it from my life long career employment at age 66 by dubious assumptions of my age by a small company. I believe their less susceptible to discriminatory accusations then larger businesses which have greater implication put upon them by government. The #Covid-19 pandemic has put pressure on the employment sector in way that have done nothing but benefit corporations and the wealthy.
@@DigiologyStudios Sorry to hear that. I will be retiring in about 5 months at the age of 65, I can still work circles around at least half of my co-workers. It seems that some of the younger generation (not all) doesn't want to work, not to mention be late, call in sick all the time or just do a lousy job. Companies should value all employees, especially the older ones that still want to work, since the choice of people to choose from to hire for the most part are less than desirable.
I've been thinking lately that we need to start an employment agency co-op owned and operated by all the employees that work for it. Eventually other companies would have to raise their wages to even get anyone to work for them. I'm fed up with the business community owning and controlling far too much of the wealth and resources in the US and I don't see anything improving until they are brought under control of the people.
Quite a revolution. May be the world will see socialism for what it really is and stop freaking out at the mere mention of the name? I sincerely wish you good luck. "A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step". Safe journey!
Love that idea! Every country should have one! I love the idea of cooperatives, if only 100% of the population would start one and abandon the private sector!
We have to cover all the various disciplines. We would need to corner what's left of the labor market, offer fellow workers food and housing. They will be forced to automate and use AI. That will be expensive.
Doesn't help one bit the overwhelming majority of them are sociopaths and narcissists. Whom also happen to be completely out of touch with reality itself.
@Scott Davis I say Sanger because despite an outward noble cause to the public. I understand she believed in eugenics from a racist view. I could be wrong but it has nothing to do with beliefs. I suppose I'm a believer in God. However I don't have proof as you say and don't adhere to any specific religion.
@@gezin82 You don't like Planned Parenthood. She supported women that were not empowered to bring children into the world because of economic circumstances. She was for empowering all women, no matter the color of skin. Conservatives will bend anything because they don't like Planned Parenthood and they feel that women should be back in the kitchen. This is historical Conservatives call it "tradition". Eugenics was just an idea that can be used easily for nefarious reasons, I agree. But Planned Parenthood needs to stay.
A perfect storm is brewing in the United States. Inflation, bank collapse, severe drought in the agricultural belt, recession, food shortages, diesel fuel and heating oil shortages, baby formula shortages, available automobile shortages and prices, the price of living place. It's all coming together and it could lead to a real disaster towards the end of this year (or sooner). With inflation currently at about 6%, my primary concern is how to maximize my savings/retirement fund of about $300k which has been sitting duck since forever with zero to no gains.
These are the conditions in which life-changing money is made by those who remain calm, patient, and take controlled risks. Volatility goes both ways. The bigger the red candles, the bigger the green ones.
Investing in stocks can be a wise decision, especially if you have a dependable trading system that can lead to successful outcomes. Personally, I've been working with a financial advisor for about a year now. Starting with less than $200K and I'm now just $19,000 away from making half a million in profit.
@@martingiavarini I think this is something I should do, but I've been stalling for a long time now. I don't really know which firm to work with; I feel they are all the same. Is there any chance you could recommend who you work with?
@@hermanramos7092 my advisor is ‘’Catherine Morrison Evans ’’ she’s highly qualified and experienced in the financial market. She has extensive knowledge of portfolio diversity and is considered an expert in the field. I recommend researching her credentials further. She has many years of experience and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market.
@@martingiavarini I just Googled her name and her website came up right away. It looks interesting so far. I sent her an email and i hope she responds soon.
Pay tributes to the knowledge owned by wolff,& his urgency to make literate &awareness to all others-is a missionary work,imparted to everyone else.Thanks again.
When one knows one doesn't know, when one doesn't know, then and only then, one may. Thank you, Professor Wolff, for all you do. You do know. Thank you for teaching us.
@@cheri238 And you know this how? Because Wolff says so? He doesn't know what "capitalism" is...which means you don't either. But here's an easy one for you...who did the robber barons rob and how did they do it, assuming you know who they were?
@J GALT The Robber Barron's were JD Rockefeller, Vanderbilt, JP Morgan, Carnegie, and his sidekick Hicks, and there were others, but here are the big four. What did they own and control? May I ask you? Subsequently, I assure you, Professor Wolff knows his American history on all sides and his expertise in economics. Why are you always analyzing me? "Those who are too lazy and comfortable to think for themselves and be their judges obey the laws, others sense their laws within them." Hermann Hesse, 1877-1962, was a Swiss poet and author. "The Birth of Tragedy," and other essays by Frederick Nietzche. I love many subjects and great thinkers, and scholars, therefore I choose the ones that have a balance of vision and wisdom of incite. I may have only a GED, but please don't pity me. Self-pity is a waste of energy and time. I have been reading books since e the age of 5 and not just nursery rhines, even though I loved them also.❤️
@@cheri238 I'm glad you know who they are...now all you have to do is finish answering the question regarding them...and I don't pity you...although you might want to use more appropriate sources with regard to the facts here. But since you are confident that Wolff knows his "history", and these were "monopolies" then did the prices they charged for what they produced increase or decrease? And just for fun, during this period, did the purchasing power of the dollar increase or decrease?
What are those important points? How do you look at monopoly capitalism with more precision, when you don't know what capitalism is or what a monopoly is? Is monopoly bad? If so, then a monopolistic government would be? A monopolistic union would be? Were the "robber barons" monopolistic? If so, who did they rob, and by what means was this robbery committed and what were the effects on the general population as a result of this robbery? What points did Wolff make with regard to these questions? If any? What is the evidence presented that confirms they were valid points? If you have a problem answering any of the above, why do you believe there are any valid points being made by Wolff?
@@jgalt308there's a live answer to your questions in America today ,look at prices everywhere, look at banking system loaning trillions they don't really have just because they have the authority to do so , all businesses are being indebted to them over Nothing, a dollar with zero backing
@@yorsan2240 Yes it's called "fiat" money, the gift of FDR that keeps on giving. So the present was inevitable and began 90 years ago. Or 120 years ago. But it doesn't answer the questions asked regarding monopoly or the actual history referenced.
@@scottdavis3571 So, do it. Might help though, if you learn to read first, proving that you know what the words mean. For once Wolff actually explained what something was correctly, and then along comes one of his sycophants, who gets it perfectly WRONG. Might help if you also had a grasp of the reality of who "we" is!!
If enough people listen and share this knowledge, this can be the beginning of a new economy and a much better world. Once we see what we can be, I don't think we will want to ever go back.
God Bless Prof Wolff. He is a true Hero a true Blessing & a True Genuine Human Being who brings the truth to us. The World needs more & more Heroes Like himself. May God Bless him. We all must support him. Thank You.
Fortunately. we have USA + Prabhat Utnaik. Vijay Prashad, Radhiks Desai. Mochael.Hudsom. David Harvey. John Bellamy.Foster, Noam.Chomsky, Michael Parenti. etc--- several.thinkers + publishers &/or researchers-- Tricontinental Institute for Social Research. Peoples Forum NYC. Left Forum, Haymarket Books. Monthly. Revire Press +.magazine. Z Magazine.+ S End Press. Intl Publishers. Charles Kerr Pub.. fortunately.etc.,etc..etc.!!! .
Big corporations play an outsized role in the stock market as well. Because of the rise of index funds such as the S&P 500, a huge chunk of money that's invested in the stock market goes to inflating the share prices of the biggest 500 companies, purely due to their size, as opposed to providing capital to smaller companies that are growing and innovating.
Articulated in a way few can or perhaps dare, I thirst for more insight, thank you Mr. Wolff ~ Homerun analysis and strategic challenges worth embracing, if the youth and more of us could really appreciate what they/we are up against maybe they would help press the playdough through a different mold.
Nah, Hitler was a far better "rabble-rouser"...and he actually had a rabble to rouse... but he does have the..."It is because of "capitalism"" thing down...if only he knew what the word meant and could actually prove it.
Can we please get Mr. Wolff in the oval office?! The video about capitalism and the war in Ukraine should have been our countries state of the union address. This man is a damn unsung hero
Be nice if he knew what the war was about...and that it is "government" that is responsible for it Got the pandemic thing wrong too so in the scheme of things, he is not very bright but just another little boy crying wolf...I guess he scared himself by looking in the mirror.
Despite the fact that I invest, I am saddened by my inability to evaluate each company's performance and determine whether or not this is the ideal time to purchase stocks. My monetary stockpile is being depleted by inflation. At this stage, I need accurate market trajectory data, but I'm not sure what to do.
Particularly in this weak market, there are several opportunities to generate excellent returns, but such intricate transactions can only be carried out by seasoned market professionals.
@patrickbrussels4454 I've been thinking about going that route. I've been holding onto a lot of stocks, but they're starting to lose value, and I'm not sure if I should retain them or sell them. I think hiring your investment coach would help me restructure my portfolio.
@patrickbrussels4454 I just looked up *STEPHANIE KOPP MEEKS* on the net and researched her accreditation. She seem very proficient, I wrote her detailing my Fin-market goals.
For anyone who watch's this channel you MUST look up economist Michael Hudson. Dr. Wolff explains things in a general and simple way, for new audiances, while Michael Hudson presents what people who have watched Dr. Wolff for a long time want.... in depth details about what is happening and who the players are.
Quisiera abrazarlo de tantas verdades y barbaridades que nos comunica. Es tan importante que todos estemos enterados lo que hacen las grandes corporaciones y como sus acciones arruinan la "libre competencia " ....y al ser humana común y corriente habitante de este planeta tierra. Saludos desde el sur del mundo, from. Chile.
You hit the nail on the head! However the situation is more serious when you consider what these mega cooperation do abroad,especially with developing countries or corrupt leaders. Slavery under a different guise is rampant!
great summary. I'm a fan. Cant tell you how sick it makes me when i see the chilling effects of these industries and how great they think they are for their customers and employees while simultaneously sucking the life and joy out of the environment.
In India there are too many small enterprises and very few big ones. As a result, it's extremely hard to find people to work for you, however much you pay, and it's impossible to do everything alone. Robots and machines can't replace humans. Manpower is a very big and serious issue.
Richard Wolff: You describe how these corporations inevitably become more monopolistic as a function of capitalism. And this to survive as well as dominate! Have you looked at what else has been going on? What of the domination by governments: to the workers of large organizations, does it matter who or what the "boss" may be? The worker's efforts, ideas are not his. He is totally anonymous! This is unless he is considered special: perhaps a party man, "hero", manager, gov't , military etc. personage. Can a "socialist" answer be really found in lieu of what was, at least originally, the volition of the much smaller, hopeful group of individuals?It's possible the cure will make it worse.
D@W I would very much love to see your approach to a big issue. How do we push our politicians and leaders to turn away from the usual escalations of war? Force peace on the elites and say no to another forever war (in this case Ukraine and perhaps Taiwan).
@@disruptapps Try doing that with a fully intact national security state currently engaged in forever wars and global brinksmanship. They'll crush you like a mosquito. Julian Assange is still rotting away. There are real life barriers to the kinds of things we have to build. Anology: Do you start building roads, depots and hospitals before or after you've defeated the enemy? I made the original point because I would like to see a little bit more anti-war, pro-peace fervor from D@W. They need to keep up with the zeitgeist or risk losing their momentum.
@@antimattv Really...so can you cite the parts of the constitution that states that is its purpose? Take your time... you can find a copy of it on-line just in case you you never read it or forgot what it was that you read.
@@jgalt308 The constitutional debates made it clear what the intentions were. The population, according to James Madison was never meant to be anything more than spectators who rubber stamp the policies of congress and the senate. I'm not getting into a pseudo-religious argument about some dusty old tome. Rules are meant to serve people, not the other way around.
I think corporation having taken over happened quite awhile ago. Ever hear if Citizens United? The Supreme Court passed it back in 2010. Do people have any idea what that meant? What do they think it meant?
@@alisonmcrae1281 They did their jobs perfectly. What their real purpose for existing is, is not what the people would like to believe it is, and is the opposite of what the people have been led to think it is. Faith in a false reality is the only think that is keeping their system going.
Thanks Mr Wolf. And all of what you just described is even more bitterly amplified in nations, where the resources and ability to compete is much smaller than in the USA. They, the Oligarchs, loudly shout out: Allow the competition and free market to decide about the success of our endeavour. And with this Bullshit misleading, knowing that those poorer nations have no ability to compete against these multinationals, they win over and in the process destroy zillions of local smaller businesses and kill the livelihood of millions of people. I would absolutely support the initiative that the Germans introduced to curb the behavior of those bigger companies by electing their representatives.
The ONLY way I am able to see OUT of this insane system would be to make it financially worthwhile for people to SHARE the jobs WE would democratically agree we NEED and want to have done and work much less...no more working primarily FOR money ..no more an infinite growth system...no more doing bullshit jobs...no more doing pointless jobs...no more doing planet harming jobs..no more fears of losing jobs...no more unemployment ..just the pleasure of less work.
Bringing money back to 100% barter system, or simple medium of exchange. No "growth", no interest, no speculation, no "capital gains". The idea that growth is necessary for prosperity of all was created by those who desire power over others.
I worked for AT&T we were regulated & only allowed to make a certain amount, not allowed to make more. I never laughed at my customers I tried to help. I didn't price anything that was done by the company & the government. Now telephone services are more expensive.
I am building cabinets as a self employed worker..the ONLY reason I am not working for some mega corporation is because I was given the extremely rare opportunity to build my own shop with very few regulations.. Sadly our country becomes more like Germany where you can't even imagine doing anything as a free and independent thinker.. the German regulators would walk into my shop.. lock me up and wrap me up permanently in red tape.. good bye small business.. I was home schooled so that is illegal there.. gotta prevent independent thoughts befor anyone tries to start up a small business.. or challenge the many regulators and their careers .
Great video, I've been interested in investing ever since I came across articles of people making up to $150,000 and more in this period, thanks for the video but is it really possible for a retail investor to achieve this in months?
I've purchased numerous stocks in individual firms. Because there are so many stocks that will skyrocket in the long run, it is currently safe to buy in on ETF and ride it out. Due to fud, I sold out early, but then retraced my ways and re-invested $350,000 with a financial advisor who manages my account. I received an 82% return last year and will see where it goes this year.
@@hermanramos7092 I just started a few months back, I'm going for long term, I'm still trying to wrap my head around it, who’s this advisor you work with ?
@@kenanporubsky2122 'Catherine Morrison Evans’is the coach that guides me. She’s a verified coach and she helped me see that returns can be made in both bull and bear markets. She covers things like investing, insurance, making sure retirement is well funded and looking at ways to have a volatility buffer for investment risk, lots of things like that.
@@hermanramos7092 thanks for sharing this, I am in conversations with your advisor, and she really has substance, having interviewed her properly and reviewed her model, I am hoping she takes me on quite seriously too
Reading the comments I notice few of them seem to have more than half grasp of your lecture. How can society change tack economic direction when so few of the electorate are able to focus on economic truths that have been designed specifically to make them unintelligableto the majority. Its the "find the pea" game writ large.
@@ryanosterman2651 I cant think of a simple coherent arguement to counter the barrage of misinformation myself but im sure there is one. I miss Tony Benn and his clarity, this lot in westminster are hopeless.
This is very good. I would just add that successful corporation do not become successful because of the services they provide or the customers they serve. They become successful because of government boons and by not paying taxes.
@@jgalt308 companies like Wal-Mart, the banks, the oil companies, the rails, the airlines, Amazon, Uber, GE, SpaceX Tesla, Microsoft, Mac, Intel are some big companies. There are lots of little companies at the municipal level as well. In my neighborhood, it is Cookie cart, Webber Mart, HW White, Camden Cycles, North Market and a whole lot more. Not my business though. I'm in the "free" market.
@@user-wp8yx But the banks aren't capitalist, nor are real estate or insurance companies... As for the rest, what seems to be your problem with them...and what proof do you have that they are not paying taxes? And what is the reason that they are not? And what "free market" would that be?
@@YTcensors Eggs are good for you. Not all forms of cholesterol are bad. Your cells need it to function, and you would be very sickly without enough of it ...probably why they've told people over the years that trans-fats are good for you, saturated fats are bad, and why they still leave people in confusion over eggs. Healthcare is big $$$. Sick people are profitable.
@@jgalt308 I don't think they would like Tom DiLorenzo's studies on the Robber Barrons.. there's no data that suggests industrialists were raising prices...actually the data showed that big industry like oil and steel were dropping prices faster than the over-all market. Sherman...gen Sherman's brother...was a SOB..and he support a high tariff act right after the anti-trust legislation...which makes no sense if you want competition.. the implication is that anti-trust was NOT used by ordinary people but other competitors and the goal was not to foster competition but instead undermine Rockefeller and others who were lowering prices..
@@chuckleaf8027 Yeah, Ida Tarbell got mad because her daddy couldn't compete with and had to sell out to Standard Oil...and the price of oil fell from it's 1865 price of $16./12/brrl to less that $1. and stayed there until the company was broken up in 1909. Similar price drops occurred, everywhere else too. And dollar regained its 1860 purchasing power also. All of this is the exact opposite of what Wolff is selling...which is why the details are never part of his "economics".
I think RFK Jr......would agree with some of these ideas.....I know he hates the power wielding corporations ! I hope he and you can discuss this at some time !
Very thoughtful discussion. It is only when the companies are growing and innovating that they are useful to all in society. A limit needs to be imposed by elected bodies to do this. Right now, political parties are monopolies as well. Why is there just conservative and liberal options in the US? Maybe the fight has to start there.
Prof. Wolff: Interesting points, is it better to have the all powerful gov'ts. Instead of Mega Corps.? Isn't it a step backward to go for the Megagov"t. over the corps.?
So in the early seventies we knew. We had a population problem. But the dept based economy need more people to justify made up money and demand for goods and services. However now so much capital has been created the prices are too high for regular people to afford.
Thank you for putting democracy in America in perspective. We need something in between big and small businesses. Socialism isn't the answer either either.
You almost got it! You are very right when you explain that there is an obvious need to limit the size of BIG corporations. Limits are the most important characteristics MISSING in the capitalism model. However, you forgot to talk about the most important limit and this is the limit on how much wealth a SINGLE INDIVIDUAL should be authorized to accumulate. The nature has limits: a tall man is not 300 times taller than the shortest man, a fat man is not 300 times bigger than the slimest man! Why don't have we limits on INDIVIDUALS? If we have HUGE corporations it is because they pay HUGE revenues to their top management. Top management is highly paid to give HUGE profit to stockholders. The most important point is to limit how much wealth an individual can accumulate. Until we keep having billionaires and now as inequalities increase we have trillionaires the problem will never be solved! We need more millionaires but prevent the existence of billion or trillionaires!
Richard. Professor Cliff Bowman of the Cranfield Inst. of Technology in England offers of VG explanation of Capitalist crisis on TH-cam. However, when he gets to the over production, bancuptcies and takeovers, he calls it all "consolidation", claiming that "constant capital" is thereby eliminated and that the whole cycle begins again. You should write to him. He needs help and a reality check
Haleluyaaaaaaaa! Haleluyaaaaaaaa! "(Exodus 18:11)" Now I know that THE BLESSED MOST HIGHER HOLY ALMIGHTY MIGHTY is greater than all gods:Haleluyaaaaaaaa! Haleluyaaaaaaaa! "(Exodus 18:11)" Now I know that THE BLESSED MOST HIGHER HOLY ALMIGHTY MIGHTY is greater than all gods:
Something you didn't mention : how the profits of corporations are internalized while the negative "externalities" of their operations are payed for by you and me, the taxpayer. The mere term "externality" is a slick and insidious, lawyer-ish ploy utilized by Big Money. Not to mention the "subsidies" we, the tax payer provide them as they rake in record profits!
Good point, but after listening to Mr. Wolff for sometime now, that goes without saying at this point. I call it the "Shxt Flows Downhill" Theory! Like in Palestine! Love the Wolff! However, this is not Capitalism... too big to fail...too big to jail. This is full blown fascism ... the merger of state and corporate powers! The Wolff is a very wise man and understands the manipulative power of Edward Bernays work on Public Relations. This before social media, but the principles remain similar. Humans are Herd Animals running out of Fertilizer and other Resources.
See: Norfolk southern
Soon God will attend ro all this, as the USD collapses to its intrinsic value of 0.03 $
@@koahamtosoaham Which "GOD" is that? "GOD" is typically used by Humans to maintain faith in the Status Quo while providing for the ultimate form of plausible deniability. I agree with the 0.03 $ part though.
As a worker, I've been just as exploited, if not more, by small family-owned businesses.
Absolutely. Because every small business wats to capture bigger market share and increase profit. Just part of capitalism.
It's true. The most exploitative jobs I've ever had, not necessarily in the true Marxist sense of exploration (aka profit margin per hour extracted from the workers), but in terms of how hard they make you work and how much you get paid - have all been from small businesses. The least exploitative job I've had yet is my current unionized job working for a Fortune 500 corporation, because they are able to offer more and better benefits, and far better pay, in addition to being able to offer things like catered lunches and so on, and it's not because they want to be more humane than a small business, but rather because the corporation simply has far more money they can spend, and because they are more of a target for OSHA and the Department of Labor as an entity with large numbers of employees. People like Matt Stoller who act like the problem with capitalism is the problem of monopoly and oligopoly make the critical mistake in assuming that smaller businesses will be better for workers and consumers, when there is just no evidence of this. Perhaps product quality and prices would be better for consumers, but they would be no different for workers. This is why the Marxist perspective is invaluable.
In what way, can you give some examples??
I was just terminate that's how I call it from my life long career employment at age 66 by dubious assumptions of my age by a small company. I believe their less susceptible to discriminatory accusations then larger businesses which have greater implication put upon them by government. The #Covid-19 pandemic has put pressure on the employment sector in way that have done nothing but benefit corporations and the wealthy.
@@DigiologyStudios Sorry to hear that. I will be retiring in about 5 months at the age of 65, I can still work circles around at least half of my co-workers. It seems that some of the younger generation (not all) doesn't want to work, not to mention be late, call in sick all the time or just do a lousy job. Companies should value all employees, especially the older ones that still want to work, since the choice of people to choose from to hire for the most part are less than desirable.
I've been thinking lately that we need to start an employment agency co-op owned and operated by all the employees that work for it. Eventually other companies would have to raise their wages to even get anyone to work for them. I'm fed up with the business community owning and controlling far too much of the wealth and resources in the US and I don't see anything improving until they are brought under control of the people.
Quite a revolution. May be the world will see socialism for what it really is and stop freaking out at the mere mention of the name? I sincerely wish you good luck. "A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step". Safe journey!
Love that idea! Every country should have one! I love the idea of cooperatives, if only 100% of the population would start one and abandon the private sector!
Spain's Mondragon cooperative can give you an idea other than corporation only.
We have to cover all the various disciplines. We would need to corner what's left of the labor market, offer fellow workers food and housing. They will be forced to automate and use AI. That will be expensive.
@serria john I would look at Vietnam, since socialism works there.
there is too much wealth concentrated in the hands of too few people .....who are not competent enough to use it for highest and best purposes
and what would those be?
Doesn't help one bit the overwhelming majority of them are sociopaths and narcissists. Whom also happen to be completely out of touch with reality itself.
You nailed it Professor Wolff Corporate Oligarchs pretty much own Governments all over the world.
They even own the "social democracies".
It's a capitalist dream now. Hister would be proud and Darwin, Margaret Sanger and the 🐀 rats.
Inevitable under capitalism(fascism).
@Scott Davis I say Sanger because despite an outward noble cause to the public. I understand she believed in eugenics from a racist view.
I could be wrong but it has nothing to do with beliefs.
I suppose I'm a believer in God. However I don't have proof as you say and don't adhere to any specific religion.
@@gezin82 You don't like Planned Parenthood. She supported women that were not empowered to bring children into the world because of economic circumstances. She was for empowering all women, no matter the color of skin. Conservatives will bend anything because they don't like Planned Parenthood and they feel that women should be back in the kitchen. This is historical Conservatives call it "tradition". Eugenics was just an idea that can be used easily for nefarious reasons, I agree. But Planned Parenthood needs to stay.
Thanks
A perfect storm is brewing in the United States. Inflation, bank collapse, severe drought in the agricultural belt, recession, food shortages, diesel fuel and heating oil shortages, baby formula shortages, available automobile shortages and prices, the price of living place. It's all coming together and it could lead to a real disaster towards the end of this year (or sooner). With inflation currently at about 6%, my primary concern is how to maximize my savings/retirement fund of about $300k which has been sitting duck since forever with zero to no gains.
These are the conditions in which life-changing money is made by those who remain calm, patient, and take controlled risks. Volatility goes both ways. The bigger the red candles, the bigger the green ones.
Investing in stocks can be a wise decision, especially if you have a dependable trading system that can lead to successful outcomes. Personally, I've been working with a financial advisor for about a year now. Starting with less than $200K and I'm now just $19,000 away from making half a million in profit.
@@martingiavarini I think this is something I should do, but I've been stalling for a long time now. I don't really know which firm to work with; I feel they are all the same. Is there any chance you could recommend who you work with?
@@hermanramos7092 my advisor is ‘’Catherine Morrison Evans ’’ she’s highly qualified and experienced in the financial market. She has extensive knowledge of portfolio diversity and is considered an expert in the field. I recommend researching her credentials further. She has many years of experience and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market.
@@martingiavarini I just Googled her name and her website came up right away. It looks interesting so far. I sent her an email and i hope she responds soon.
Just wanted to express my appreciation for your excellent teaching. You have been a large part of my education!
Pay tributes to the knowledge owned by wolff,& his urgency to make literate &awareness to all others-is a missionary work,imparted to everyone else.Thanks again.
When one knows one doesn't know, when one doesn't know, then and only then, one may. Thank you, Professor Wolff, for all you do. You do know. Thank you for teaching us.
and what would that be?
@@jgalt308
CAPITALISM IS THE PROBLEM.
@@cheri238 And you know this how? Because Wolff says so? He doesn't know
what "capitalism" is...which means you don't either.
But here's an easy one for you...who did the robber barons rob and how did they do it,
assuming you know who they were?
@J GALT
The Robber Barron's were JD Rockefeller, Vanderbilt, JP Morgan, Carnegie, and his sidekick Hicks, and there were others, but here are the big four. What did they own and control? May I ask you? Subsequently, I assure you, Professor Wolff knows his American history on all sides and his expertise in economics.
Why are you always analyzing me?
"Those who are too lazy and comfortable to think for themselves and be their judges obey the laws, others sense their laws within them."
Hermann Hesse, 1877-1962, was a Swiss poet and author.
"The Birth of Tragedy," and other essays by Frederick Nietzche.
I love many subjects and great thinkers, and scholars, therefore I choose the ones that have a balance of vision and wisdom of incite.
I may have only a GED, but please don't pity me. Self-pity is a waste of energy and time. I have been reading books since e the age of 5 and not just nursery rhines, even though I loved them also.❤️
@@cheri238 I'm glad you know who they are...now all you have to do is finish answering the question
regarding them...and I don't pity you...although you might want to use more
appropriate sources with regard to the facts here.
But since you are confident that Wolff knows his "history", and these were "monopolies"
then did the prices they charged for what they produced increase or decrease?
And just for fun, during this period, did the purchasing power of
the dollar increase or decrease?
The professor lays out some real important points and ways to start looking at monopoly capitalism with more precision.
What are those important points? How do you look at monopoly capitalism with more
precision, when you don't know what capitalism is or what a monopoly is?
Is monopoly bad? If so, then a monopolistic government would be? A monopolistic union would be?
Were the "robber barons" monopolistic? If so, who did they rob, and by what means was this robbery committed
and what were the effects on the general population as a result of this robbery?
What points did Wolff make with regard to these questions? If any?
What is the evidence presented that confirms they were valid points?
If you have a problem answering any of the above, why do you believe there are
any valid points being made by Wolff?
@@jgalt308there's a live answer to your questions in America today ,look at prices everywhere, look at banking system loaning trillions they don't really have just because they have the authority to do so , all businesses are being indebted to them over Nothing, a dollar with zero backing
@@yorsan2240 Yes it's called "fiat" money, the gift of FDR that keeps on giving.
So the present was inevitable and began 90 years ago. Or 120 years ago.
But it doesn't answer the questions asked regarding monopoly or the actual history referenced.
Thanks!
P&G is a perfect example of vertical integration. They buy out the product lines, by buying the company who made the brands.
So you don't know what vertical integration is?
@@jgalt308 Yes John Galt. We want to democratize ownership of the means of production, though. We don't really care about so-called "Captains".
@@scottdavis3571 So, do it. Might help though, if you learn to read first, proving that you know what the words mean. For once Wolff actually explained what something was correctly, and then along comes one of his sycophants, who gets it perfectly WRONG.
Might help if you also had a grasp of the reality of who "we" is!!
If enough people listen and share this knowledge, this can be the beginning of a new economy and a much better world. Once we see what we can be, I don't think we will want to ever go back.
That’s what they said in 1940.
God Bless Prof Wolff. He is a true Hero a true Blessing & a True Genuine Human Being who brings the truth to us. The World needs more & more Heroes Like himself. May God Bless him. We all must support him. Thank You.
Fortunately. we have USA + Prabhat
Utnaik. Vijay Prashad, Radhiks Desai.
Mochael.Hudsom. David Harvey.
John Bellamy.Foster, Noam.Chomsky,
Michael Parenti. etc--- several.thinkers
+ publishers &/or researchers--
Tricontinental Institute for Social
Research. Peoples Forum NYC. Left
Forum, Haymarket Books. Monthly.
Revire Press +.magazine. Z Magazine.+
S End Press. Intl Publishers. Charles Kerr Pub.. fortunately.etc.,etc..etc.!!!
.
Great video, Professor.
When exposing a crime is treated as committing a crime, you are being ruled by criminals.”
Thank you❤🌹🙏 dear💕 professor Wolff, hope❤ your channel grows bigger and better!
Yes. Moving on...
It's owners vs. inhabitants. Thank you for pointing this out so well.
Magnificent Richard. Many many thanks
Big corporations play an outsized role in the stock market as well. Because of the rise of index funds such as the S&P 500, a huge chunk of money that's invested in the stock market goes to inflating the share prices of the biggest 500 companies, purely due to their size, as opposed to providing capital to smaller companies that are growing and innovating.
As Michael.Hudson says, there is finance
for speculation vs
finance for production of physical.objects, services, data, etc. =
real sector of economy.
Articulated in a way few can or perhaps dare, I thirst for more insight, thank you Mr. Wolff ~ Homerun analysis and strategic challenges worth embracing, if the youth and more of us could really appreciate what they/we are up against maybe they would help press the playdough through a different mold.
Nah, Hitler was a far better "rabble-rouser"...and he actually had a rabble to rouse...
but he does have the..."It is because of "capitalism"" thing down...if only he knew what
the word meant and could actually prove it.
Can we please get Mr. Wolff in the oval office?! The video about capitalism and the war in Ukraine should have been our countries state of the union address. This man is a damn unsung hero
Be nice if he knew what the war was about...and that it is "government" that is
responsible for it Got the pandemic thing wrong too so in the scheme of things,
he is not very bright but just another little boy crying wolf...I guess he scared himself by looking
in the mirror.
Thank you for your excellent work
I'm no economist but I have been saying so to my friend for years. Bravo!
Don' feel bad, Wolff isn't an economist either.
You should do a video comparing private companies and state run companies to analyze how they compete with each other in the global economy
Great , clear .
Awesome.
Thank you ❤
Excelente presentacion como siempre MAESTRO felicitaciones
Despite the fact that I invest, I am saddened by my inability to evaluate each company's performance and determine whether or not this is the ideal time to purchase stocks. My monetary stockpile is being depleted by inflation. At this stage, I need accurate market trajectory data, but I'm not sure what to do.
Particularly in this weak market, there are several opportunities to generate excellent returns, but such intricate transactions can only be carried out by seasoned market professionals.
I suggest that you look for a mentor or knowledgeable advisor, particularly in light of the current economic climate.
@patrickbrussels4454 I've been thinking about going that route. I've been holding onto a lot of stocks, but they're starting to lose value, and I'm not sure if I should retain them or sell them. I think hiring your investment coach would help me restructure my portfolio.
@patrickbrussels4454 I just looked up *STEPHANIE KOPP MEEKS* on the net and researched her accreditation. She seem very proficient, I wrote her detailing my Fin-market goals.
Go work for Uncle Sam.
I like this channel because there is no ad.
Interesting topic, and incredible breakdown.
For anyone who watch's this channel you MUST look up economist Michael Hudson. Dr. Wolff explains things in a general and simple way, for new audiances, while Michael Hudson presents what people who have watched Dr. Wolff for a long time want.... in depth details about what is happening and who the players are.
Both made a joint video together on youtube !!
Quisiera abrazarlo de tantas verdades y barbaridades que nos comunica. Es tan importante que todos estemos enterados lo que hacen las grandes corporaciones y como sus acciones arruinan la "libre competencia " ....y al ser humana común y corriente habitante de este planeta tierra. Saludos desde el sur del mundo, from. Chile.
I'm very picky of what I watch and this is one of them ! 👍
Fantastic speech.👏👏♥️♥️🇮🇪🍀🇵🇸
Thanks and appreciation
❤😊 Great job @democracyatwork
You hit the nail on the head! However the situation is more serious when you consider what these mega cooperation do abroad,especially with developing countries or corrupt leaders. Slavery under a different guise is rampant!
I have an idea 💡 If they want to save a lot of money, they could fire their CEOs
The solution is NOT complex! Thank you boss!
Thanks for the enlightenment Prof. Wolff ❤😂🎉😅😊
great summary. I'm a fan.
Cant tell you how sick it makes me when i see the chilling effects of these industries and how great they think they are for their customers and employees while simultaneously sucking the life and joy out of the environment.
The smallest man is he who has used lots of time own tongue and gotten a number of English answers. Thank you a lot
Yes! What should be done to return to Adam Smith theory of liberalism?
In India there are too many small enterprises and very few big ones. As a result, it's extremely hard to find people to work for you, however much you pay, and it's impossible to do everything alone.
Robots and machines can't replace humans. Manpower is a very big and serious issue.
🔥🚬🥇🚬🔥 Spot on Richard 💯 The beginning, middle and end of story. 🥂🎬🚬
Good day dear professor wollf,
Would you please tell us about Mr. Mersheamer's position on Ukraine war is correct?
Richard Wolff: You describe how these corporations inevitably become more monopolistic as a function of capitalism. And this to survive as well as dominate! Have you looked at what else has been going on?
What of the domination by governments: to the workers of large organizations, does it matter who or what the "boss" may be? The worker's efforts, ideas are not his. He is totally anonymous! This is unless he is considered special: perhaps a party man, "hero", manager, gov't , military etc. personage. Can a "socialist" answer be really found in lieu of what was, at least originally, the volition of the much smaller, hopeful group of individuals?It's possible the cure will make it worse.
Thank you for the info
I love the content - and the opening music.
D@W I would very much love to see your approach to a big issue. How do we push our politicians and leaders to turn away from the usual escalations of war? Force peace on the elites and say no to another forever war (in this case Ukraine and perhaps Taiwan).
@@disruptapps Try doing that with a fully intact national security state currently engaged in forever wars and global brinksmanship.
They'll crush you like a mosquito. Julian Assange is still rotting away.
There are real life barriers to the kinds of things we have to build.
Anology:
Do you start building roads, depots and hospitals before or after you've defeated the enemy?
I made the original point because I would like to see a little bit more anti-war, pro-peace fervor from D@W. They need to keep up with the zeitgeist or risk losing their momentum.
We use to have a "constitution" that served that purpose...but you
don't anymore, so now you have the government you deserve.
@@jgalt308 The constitution continues to fit its purpose wonderfully. That is to ensure the wealth of a select few property owners.
@@antimattv Really...so can you cite the parts of the constitution that
states that is its purpose?
Take your time... you can find a copy of it on-line just in case you
you never read it or forgot what it was that you read.
@@jgalt308 The constitutional debates made it clear what the intentions were. The population, according to James Madison was never meant to be anything more than spectators who rubber stamp the policies of congress and the senate.
I'm not getting into a pseudo-religious argument about some dusty old tome. Rules are meant to serve people, not the other way around.
Anyone posing this as a question in their title is begging not to be taken seriously.
You are the best!
They are vanguard, state street, and blackrock
Obviously, good show.
Comment added for algo- rhythm n blues 🎉.. keep teaching us
I think corporation having taken over happened quite awhile ago. Ever hear if Citizens United? The Supreme Court passed it back in 2010. Do people have any idea what that meant? What do they think it meant?
Congress was told by the court to make the money transparent, once again the politicians did not do their job.
@@alisonmcrae1281 They did their jobs perfectly. What their real purpose for existing is, is not what the people would like to believe it is, and is the opposite of what the people have been led to think it is. Faith in a false reality is the only think that is keeping their system going.
Definately !!!
Thank you for these. 👍
Thanks Mr Wolf.
And all of what you just described is even more bitterly amplified in nations, where the resources and ability to compete is much smaller than in the USA.
They, the Oligarchs, loudly shout out: Allow the competition and free market to decide about the success of our endeavour.
And with this Bullshit misleading, knowing that those poorer nations have no ability to compete against these multinationals, they win over and
in the process destroy zillions of local smaller businesses and kill the livelihood of millions of people.
I would absolutely support the initiative that the Germans introduced to curb the behavior of those bigger companies by electing their representatives.
The ONLY way I am able to see OUT of this insane system would be to make it financially worthwhile for people to SHARE the jobs WE would democratically agree we NEED and want to have done and work much less...no more working primarily FOR money ..no more an infinite growth system...no more doing bullshit jobs...no more doing pointless jobs...no more doing planet harming jobs..no more fears of losing jobs...no more unemployment ..just the pleasure of less work.
Bringing money back to 100% barter system, or simple medium of exchange. No "growth", no interest, no speculation, no "capital gains". The idea that growth is necessary for prosperity of all was created by those who desire power over others.
I worked for AT&T we were regulated & only allowed to make a certain amount, not allowed to make more. I never laughed at my customers I tried to help. I didn't price anything that was done by the company & the government. Now telephone services are more expensive.
Either big mall employments or self employed small businesses economically which option would be good enough.
Based- keep up the good work. 🔥 🔥 🔥
Simple answer, yes..
I am building cabinets as a self employed worker..the ONLY reason I am not working for some mega corporation is because I was given the extremely rare opportunity to build my own shop with very few regulations.. Sadly our country becomes more like Germany where you can't even imagine doing anything as a free and independent thinker.. the German regulators would walk into my shop.. lock me up and wrap me up permanently in red tape.. good bye small business.. I was home schooled so that is illegal there.. gotta prevent independent thoughts befor anyone tries to start up a small business.. or challenge the many regulators and their careers .
Great video, I've been interested in investing ever since I came across articles of people making up to $150,000 and more in this period, thanks for the video but is it really possible for a retail investor to achieve this in months?
I've purchased numerous stocks in individual firms. Because there are so many stocks that will skyrocket in the long run, it is currently safe to buy in on ETF and ride it out. Due to fud, I sold out early, but then retraced my ways and re-invested $350,000 with a financial advisor who manages my account. I received an 82% return last year and will see where it goes this year.
that's quite impressive, you surely made a good bit of money. I myself invested in warren's BRK-A stock quite pricey but totally worth it.
@@hermanramos7092 I just started a few months back, I'm going for long term, I'm still trying to wrap my head around it, who’s this advisor you work with ?
@@kenanporubsky2122 'Catherine Morrison Evans’is the coach that guides me. She’s a verified coach and she helped me see that returns can be made in both bull and bear markets. She covers things like investing, insurance, making sure retirement is well funded and looking at ways to have a volatility buffer for investment risk, lots of things like that.
@@hermanramos7092 thanks for sharing this, I am in conversations with your advisor, and she really has substance, having interviewed her properly and reviewed her model, I am hoping she takes me on quite seriously too
Florida's insurance commissioner failed to do his job ,he presented resignation the day after legislation passed, governor signed as well
Reading the comments I notice few of them seem to have more than half grasp of your lecture. How can society change tack economic direction when so few of the electorate are able to focus on economic truths that have been designed specifically to make them unintelligableto the majority. Its the "find the pea" game writ large.
A lot of it is purposeful trolling,
@@ryanosterman2651 I cant think of a simple coherent arguement to counter the barrage of misinformation myself but im sure there is one. I miss Tony Benn and his clarity, this lot in westminster are hopeless.
Yes there a big part of it
Nothing about liability vs limited liability ?
Just chack what happened to the Qatar gate( corruption case ) swept under the carpet
Walmart, how have they raised prices through monopoly?
I’m in trucking business mega cooperations is destroying mom and pap carries, small carriers such as myself.
Yes. Next question.
This is very good. I would just add that successful corporation do not become successful because of the services they provide or the customers they serve. They become successful because of government boons and by not paying taxes.
And who would those be?
@@jgalt308 companies like Wal-Mart, the banks, the oil companies, the rails, the airlines, Amazon, Uber, GE, SpaceX Tesla, Microsoft, Mac, Intel are some big companies. There are lots of little companies at the municipal level as well. In my neighborhood, it is Cookie cart, Webber Mart, HW White, Camden Cycles, North Market and a whole lot more. Not my business though. I'm in the "free" market.
@@user-wp8yx But the banks aren't capitalist, nor are real estate or insurance companies...
As for the rest, what seems to be your problem with them...and what proof do you
have that they are not paying taxes? And what is the reason that they are not?
And what "free market" would that be?
@@jgalt308 right, they aren't capitalist. You can look up the rest.
Why didn't standard oil raise prices?
@@YTcensors Eggs are good for you. Not all forms of cholesterol are bad. Your cells need it to function, and you would be very sickly without enough of it ...probably why they've told people over the years that trans-fats are good for you, saturated fats are bad, and why they still leave people in confusion over eggs. Healthcare is big $$$. Sick people are profitable.
@@CatastrophicNewEngland look up Standard Oil's actual profits.. YTCensors is just making stuff up..
It doesn't look like they understood the question...
@@jgalt308 I don't think they would like Tom DiLorenzo's studies on the Robber Barrons.. there's no data that suggests industrialists were raising prices...actually the data showed that big industry like oil and steel were dropping prices faster than the over-all market. Sherman...gen Sherman's brother...was a SOB..and he support a high tariff act right after the anti-trust legislation...which makes no sense if you want competition.. the implication is that anti-trust was NOT used by ordinary people but other competitors and the goal was not to foster competition but instead undermine Rockefeller and others who were lowering prices..
@@chuckleaf8027 Yeah, Ida Tarbell got mad because her daddy couldn't compete with
and had to sell out to Standard Oil...and the price of oil fell from
it's 1865 price of $16./12/brrl to less that $1. and stayed there until
the company was broken up in 1909. Similar price drops occurred, everywhere else too.
And dollar regained its 1860 purchasing power also.
All of this is the exact opposite of what Wolff is selling...which is why the details
are never part of his "economics".
Yes
I think RFK Jr......would agree with some of these ideas.....I know he hates the power wielding corporations ! I hope he and you can discuss this at some time !
He hates corporations until he got to be a leader in one. Now he's just like one of them
Standard Oil is another example of monopoly power.
yes
No need to sacrifice. After a certain size they should be nationalized which adds to the social surplus and public wealth. No different with coops.
Very thoughtful discussion. It is only when the companies are growing and innovating that they are useful to all in society. A limit needs to be imposed by elected bodies to do this. Right now, political parties are monopolies as well. Why is there just conservative and liberal options in the US? Maybe the fight has to start there.
Prof. Wolff: Interesting points, is it better to have the all powerful gov'ts. Instead of Mega Corps.? Isn't it a step backward to go for the Megagov"t. over the corps.?
Oligarcy.
One ring to rule them all?
Yes.
So in the early seventies we knew. We had a population problem. But the dept based economy need more people to justify made up money and demand for goods and services. However now so much capital has been created the prices are too high for regular people to afford.
Recently this question occupy my mind. What if money doesn’t grow? What will happen? Probably everything takes the right place.
Thank you for putting democracy in America in perspective. We need something in between big and small businesses. Socialism isn't the answer either either.
Ernst Wolff writes about the “Digital, Financial Complex” Would be great if Professor Wolff would interview him.
Indeed yes they are doing it
You almost got it!
You are very right when you explain that there is an obvious need to limit the size of BIG corporations.
Limits are the most important characteristics MISSING in the capitalism model.
However, you forgot to talk about the most important limit and this is the limit on how much wealth a SINGLE INDIVIDUAL should be authorized to accumulate.
The nature has limits: a tall man is not 300 times taller than the shortest man, a fat man is not 300 times bigger than the slimest man! Why don't have we limits on INDIVIDUALS?
If we have HUGE corporations it is because they pay HUGE revenues to their top management. Top management is highly paid to give HUGE profit to stockholders.
The most important point is to limit how much wealth an individual can accumulate.
Until we keep having billionaires and now as inequalities increase we have trillionaires the problem will never be solved!
We need more millionaires but prevent the existence of billion or trillionaires!
That should be a fairly obvious YES!
Prof Wolfe and Bernie in the white house... dream team!!
Thought leader 💯
I made these exact suggestions
Richard. Professor Cliff Bowman of the Cranfield Inst. of Technology in England offers of VG explanation of Capitalist crisis on TH-cam. However, when he gets to the over production, bancuptcies and takeovers, he calls it all "consolidation", claiming that "constant capital" is thereby eliminated and that the whole cycle begins again. You should write to him. He needs help and a reality check
Haleluyaaaaaaaa! Haleluyaaaaaaaa! "(Exodus 18:11)"
Now I know that THE BLESSED MOST HIGHER HOLY ALMIGHTY MIGHTY is greater than all gods:Haleluyaaaaaaaa! Haleluyaaaaaaaa! "(Exodus 18:11)"
Now I know that THE BLESSED MOST HIGHER HOLY ALMIGHTY MIGHTY is greater than all gods: