Ivanchuk schools Kramnik’s KID with the Sämisch
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024
- Featured is an instructive chess game between Vasyl Ivanchuk and Vladimir Kramnik from the 1996 Las Palmas Tournament. This is a model game for the Sämisch variation in response to the King's Indian Defense (KID). Pay special attention to how Ivanchuk maneuvers both knights. After move 28, there is a glaring quality difference between Ivanchuk's knights and Kramnik's knights. It should not come as a surprise that in the end a knight fork surfaced. Ivanchuk was in control throughout the entire game, and his play registered an accuracy of 98%.
#VasylIvanchuk #VladimirKramnik #KingsIndianDefense
Image of Vasyl Ivanchuk by Lennart Ootes
lennartootes.com
I'm a self-taught National Master in chess out of Pennsylvania, USA who was introduced to the game by my father in 1988 at the age of 8. The purpose of this channel is to share my knowledge of chess to help others improve their game. I enjoy continuing to improve my understanding of this great game, albeit slowly. Consider subscribing here on TH-cam for frequent content, and/or connecting via any or all of the below social medias. Your support is greatly appreciated. Take care, bye. :)
★ LICHESS.ORG lichess.org/@/...
★ CHESS.COM www.chess.com/... (affiliate link)
★ TWITCH / chessnetwork
★ TWITTER / chessnetwork
★ FACEBOOK / chessnetwork
★ PATREON / chessnetwork
★ DONATE www.paypal.com...
PGN
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nge2 O-O 6. f3 c5 7. d5 e6 8. Ng3 exd5 9. cxd5 Nbd7 10. Be2 a6 11. a4 h5 12. Bg5 Qe8 13. Qd2 Nh7 14. Bh6 Qe5 15. Bxg7 Qxg7 16. Nf1 f5 17. exf5 gxf5 18. Ne3 Kh8 19. Nc4 Qf6 20. O-O Rb8 21. Rfe1 b5 22. axb5 axb5 23. Na5 b4 24. Nb5 Ba6 25. Nc7 Bxe2 26. Rxe2 Rg8 27. Nc6 Rbc8 28. Ne6 Ra8 29. Rae1 Ra2 30. Nf4 Qg5 31. h4 Qg3 32. Re6 Ndf6 33. Ne7 Rga8 34. Nfg6+
Instructive Chess Games
th-cam.com/play/PLQsLDm9Rq9bHImby8Ib3wudOjBl2hDgOz.html
thoguht u meant kramnik's son
lol same
I thought it was Kramnik's student
It's King's Indian Defense
Hey Jerry, thanks for all the instructive videos :)
By far the channel with the highest quality chess commentary, Keep it up sir 👍
Beautiful game! As a KID player myself the Saemish is one that I struggle with. Its not easy to fend it off against an experienced opponent. Thanks Jerry and Merry Christmas!
Nice knights. That was cool. Merry Xmas, man
Too bad for Kramnik that he was not able to do "the procedure" in 1996. The way Ivanchuk dismantled him would have surely lead to a block and report. I enjoyed the game a lot. Not only that it is a model game with perfect piece coordination, but it was a win of one of my favorite players against someone, who lost my respect already.
Kramnik doesn't report players who are established. He raises concerns against those who have wildly disproportionate results in their online performance versus OTB.
@@ubermensch4304you mean like Hikaru Nakamura, for example? Yeah that guys never competed well in world blitz or anything.
@KF1 Kramnik has stated multiple times that he does not accuse Hikaru of cheating. He raises concerns regarding Hikaru's streaks online, which are very improbable from a statistical point of view. But he has always made it clear that one of his theories is that Hikaru is able to achieve these streaks because he plays overrated opponents who got their rating through cheating but are too afraid to cheat against Hikaru. Thus Hikaru is able to dominate them because they play at their real rating against him. This in turn causes Hikaru's streaks to seem improbable when they're really not, because the rating of the opponents is actually lower than it appears.
The other option, of course, is that Hikaru is cheating himself.
However, Kramnik has never stated that he knows which of these possibilities is the correct one. All he has said is that it needs to be investigated.
The commenter implied he accuses people out of spite when he loses. It's not true. He pointed out real anomalies in Hikaru's play online.
@ubermensch4304 lol right. Not accusing. K then
@@KF1Yes. I just explained why. He believes that Hikaru's improbable streaks can be explained by a second theory which does not include Hikaru cheating. That theory is that he plays overrated opponents who usually cheat but are afraid to cheat against Hikaru. In that case, his streaks would no longer be improbable, as he would be playing against players whose rating is much lower than the rating they actually have attained. Did you even read my previous comment?
Time for Procedure on Kramnik
I remember looking at the annotation of this game in Inside Chess (I think) and it made a big impression on me. Nice to see it again.
Reminds me of Ivanchuk’s immortal victory over Kasparov at Linares in 1991 where he used rampant knights similarly, to win spectacularly.
I check theres no such games in 1994. Maybe you mean ivanchuk vs kasparov 1991?
@ thanks! corrected.
Silent Knight, Deadly Knight: The original horror movie starring Chuckie!
Thanks, Jerry. Wonderful video as always!
Not the usual tactical brilliancy from ivanchuk, good to see him showing off his positional understanding. Thanks Jerry.
Wow simply Tremendous Awesome play Great game thanks Jerry
When Ivanchuk woke up on the right side of the bed he was a beast.
Hi Jerry,
The video titles have been great lately. The analysis as always, was fantastic.
Also, thanks for your WCC 2024 recaps.
Take care, bye.
Wow Silent Knights! How appropriate, Just sing along. Thanks again for great coverage.
Ivanchuk and those knights. Legendary.
Kramnik’s KID -
He’ll always just be a KID and never the GOAT because even at his age he hasn’t grown up.
Many initially staunch, dyed-in-the-wool KID players stopped after a while (most famously, Kasparov). The reason is not that the KID is inherently bad, but that there are so many fundamentally different continuations for white ("Saemisch" like here, classical system which itself has many sidelines, Averbakh system, Fianchetto system, 4 Pawn attach, Exchange variation etc.). Black must study and have an answer to ALL of them if he wants to prevail, which is very time consuming. KID is probably the most uncompromising opening for black with good results for the adventurous and tactical black player, but initially it's white who can determine the greater outlines of the game.
Absolutely love it!
Great times where Kramnik could actually take losses without any implications.
Beautiful!
Someone is playing with the Tempo fader 🦉
Brilliant played
Jerry, I love the channel so much, been a fan of your content for over 10 years, and I want to see the channel grow. You could get a little more clickbaity with the thumbnails and titles. You could show a Kramnik meme or something in the thumbnail given all the controversy surrounding him as of late. There's another really good channel on the come-up recently called "Epic Chess", and he makes great content (it's not as good educationally as this channel, more for streamlined commentary with a lot of dry humor jokes, but still decently educational). He makes clickbaity titles and thumbnails, but the content is still pretty top-tier, my second favorite currently, so I don't mind the clickbait and neither does anyone else because that's the necessity of the youtube game these days. Basically if I'm being baited into watching a great video, I don't mind.
Maybe it's not your style to do that, but your commentary is so consistently top-class for so many years and I know the quality won't suffer, so I wouldn't mind if you got a little more goofy with the thumbnails and titles. I think it can be done in a way that's not inflammatory or toxic (I know you prioritize avoiding unfair and reckless takes and taking a measured and objective approach to current events on the rare occasions you cover them). Your priority seems to only be on the quality of analysis and educational value, and I respect that a lot, and that's why I always come back to this channel when I get in the chess mood. Watching it is the absolute best way to improve outside of actual focused practice games and working through chess books and puzzles. But I'd love to see this channel grow back up to the number one spot because I truly think it deserves to be revered as the pinnacle of chess youtube rather than gothamchess or hikaru.
Maybe you're not interested in this, and I respect that as well. Just a suggestion. I was a 700-800 level player when I started and I'm currently approaching 2000 on chesscom despite only playing for a couple months at a time every few years (haven't even played 600 games in total since starting), and I attribute a great deal of that to the insights I've gotten from this channel.
Also, you don't really cover opening systems and traps and stuff like that, but those types of videos do really well with beginners because beginners and younger players get crushed out of the opening and feel like they don't really know how to start the game to get a good position. You could look at the lichess opening explorer and see what openings do well below 1600 or so and cover some of those and say "The Most Brutal Opening System For Beginners". And emphasize the general motifs rather than specific lines and show some example amateur games. Maybe even hire an editor if you feel like it to make it snappy. Just some suggestions from a zoomer with his finger on the pulse of the chess youtube game 😂
Kramnik olaying KID, say what
Ouch town population Kramnik
@ChessNetwork Hey Jerry, I was wondering if you've ever played Shogi?
Hehehe, that would be cool. ShogiNetwork.
Knight power!
Hi Jerry.
I'm getting a bit worried now because of this lack of rapid sleep. ;-) I want your rapids. But perhaps you haven't won so many in a row lately, so that you have nothing good to publish, even as you try as hard as you can. But you once losing one wouldn't be a shame, you know. Please, do more "sleepy" rapids! I love them the most.
Wait, is this an instance of Kramnik playing the KID that I didn't know of? I thought he only played it twice in his career prior to his relatively famous win over Gustafsson at Dortmund 2012. But I guess the website I was reading forgot that he played the KID as his main black opening at the Las Palmas 1996 tournament, *three times*, including once against... Garry Kasparov?! Imagine that, Kasparov facing Kramnik with white in a King's Indian? That seems almost like fantasyland, but it happened.
Too much horsing around.