Bobby Fischer SHOCKS Tal w/ Genius Move That's BEYOND Computers! (But Then He Gets Greedy!)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2025
  • Is Bobby Fischer CRAZY??! (And no we are not talking about the post chess interests he developed later in life). This shocking decision comes from 1959 in his epic encounter with the legendary Mikhail Tal, who cannot believe how materialistic the young 16 year old Bobby has become! Surely he must be punished! Watch the position EXPLODE as Tal attempts to do just that!

ความคิดเห็น • 56

  • @robster101
    @robster101 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Fascinating, great commentary!

  • @गुरुगोरखनाथ
    @गुरुगोरखनाथ หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    This channel presents the most intelligent and eloquent chess commentary. It multiplies the pleasure of the game of chess.

  • @vikram.kannada
    @vikram.kannada หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Exceptional analysis/ commentary explaining the details so thoroughly. Brilliant work.

  • @iankirk9097
    @iankirk9097 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great commentary! The number one chess channel for instructional analysis.

    • @R.Akerman-oz1tf
      @R.Akerman-oz1tf หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very thorough, but the speech pattern annoys.

  • @samuelrosenbalm
    @samuelrosenbalm หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is already my favorite chess channel.

    • @squareonechess6939
      @squareonechess6939  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      wow, thanks! -- there's some steep competition out there!

  • @CATraveling4
    @CATraveling4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Always look forward to your chess videos! Perfect anaylsis every time. Don't know how you can speak so fluently without hiccups or pauses... hope your channel continues to explode!! 💪

  • @drvacuum5697
    @drvacuum5697 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great game and presentation! Very clear cut explanations.

  • @Hawk-a-Paw
    @Hawk-a-Paw หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bobby were you a chess genius? "No, I'm a genius who just happened to play chess."

  • @asmithgames5926
    @asmithgames5926 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I'm new to the channel, but this some of the best chess analysis on TH-cam!

  • @moalawadi3303
    @moalawadi3303 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    great video, loved it!

  • @sar14cos
    @sar14cos หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Tiger Petrosian produced two fantastic games against Kasparov. Petrosian conducted his black pieces like the master of defence he was. Kasparov came at him with all his offensive might, but Petrosian prevailed. I would love to see you describe Kasparov vs. Petrosian, Moscow, 1981, E12, or my favourite, Kasparov vs. Petrosian, Tilberg, 1981, D25.

  • @wreckim
    @wreckim 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It is not lost, that you are learning to entertain us by utilizing not only your talents, but all the hard work that went into analyzing the game thoroughly before presenting it. At only 20K subscribers, I'm pretty confident you have a discovered check on 100K+ subscribers about a year from now. Great channel.

  • @GoxiMcCormick
    @GoxiMcCormick หลายเดือนก่อน

    this became my favorite chess channel pretty quickly

  • @sentryogmixmaster
    @sentryogmixmaster หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    love the loud echoey use of an empty room as your audio....and so do my neighbors!

  • @TonyAube
    @TonyAube หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can you show the board from the side of the winner?
    It’s annoying seeing Bobby Fisher winning as the opponent rather than as myself.

  • @miketokles9451
    @miketokles9451 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If I had to choose 5 of the best players ever for a team tournament both of these guys would be on that team, Tal and Bob

  • @ismailabdelirada9073
    @ismailabdelirada9073 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's refreshing to hear from a chess video host who understands the games well enough to offer a lucid explanation of the logic in them, rather than just oohing and aahing because Fischer was so brilliant that his opponents were intimidated into making ruinous blunders.

    • @DoctorBuga-d1z
      @DoctorBuga-d1z หลายเดือนก่อน

      so you work for a comment farm, huh

    • @ismailabdelirada9073
      @ismailabdelirada9073 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DoctorBuga-d1z : Don't blame me. I just drive the tractor.

    • @DoctorBuga-d1z
      @DoctorBuga-d1z หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ismailabdelirada9073 i get it. we all have to earn.

    • @DoctorBuga-d1z
      @DoctorBuga-d1z หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ismailabdelirada9073 i worked for a comment farm for 3 years... i quit when i started really enjoying it.. got too scary. couldn't handle the psychology.

    • @squareonechess6939
      @squareonechess6939  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks! My goal is to not have any moves unexplained -- which is a challenge cause really understanding some moves requires wading through a ton of variations -- so knowing when to try to generalize and when to show concrete lines is always tough -- but always glad to hear from someone who appreciates the result!

  • @jasonuerkvitz3756
    @jasonuerkvitz3756 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes, more games from these two, please. And if you're so inclined, a game or two from Paul Keres. Thanks for another great video.

  • @jenssletteberg3974
    @jenssletteberg3974 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    So Fischer was the brilliant one, but lost?

  • @stopover1238
    @stopover1238 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Happy new year

  • @numberonedad
    @numberonedad หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    describing fischer's hypermodernism as being limited to his chess is brilliant

  • @Brave2standalone
    @Brave2standalone หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My two favorite players of all times!

  • @zsoltbihary3347
    @zsoltbihary3347 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent analysis. I often wonder how Tal would have reacted in some of his crazy attacking games if his opponent played an even crazier computer-line defense, visually losing, but objectively holding on. Do you know of an example for this kind of game?

    • @Corteum
      @Corteum หลายเดือนก่อน

      There will definitely be games where Tal's opponent refuted his attack with computer-like precision. Probably look at games against opponents that had a plus score on Tal when Tal was at his prime.

  • @mfburk2010
    @mfburk2010 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'd like to learn how to create these interactive chessboards.

  • @PlanXV
    @PlanXV 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I eat 😋 the zag bread 🍞 😋 🤪

  • @adamsmith2719
    @adamsmith2719 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Just for non Slavic languages speakers: the correct pronunciation of Tigran Petrosyan name is [tigran petro'syan] (not "petrojan" 😎 which perhaps is coming from "Trojan horse" expression?!?)...

  • @geromecadelinia8849
    @geromecadelinia8849 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All the way we were expecting Fischer would be able not only to survive but turn the table against Tal. Wrongly titled video Sir.

  • @Ruben-by4oy
    @Ruben-by4oy หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    my favorite from Iron Tigran is the 10th game in Petrosian VS Spasski 1966 series

  • @nuclearthreat545
    @nuclearthreat545 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Let’s go Bobby!!!

  • @Ghost_of_Paul_Morphy
    @Ghost_of_Paul_Morphy หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It would have been nicer if you just had the one board with the evaluation bar and pictures of the players on the left instead of two boards with pieces moving at the same time. It's hard to focus on one board and what you're saying about what's happening when something else is moving around at the same time on the other side of the screen.

  • @MagicChess-fg5eh
    @MagicChess-fg5eh หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Petrosian vs Spassky world championship

  • @milanpintar
    @milanpintar หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Croatia!!! 🎉

  • @daimezah2388
    @daimezah2388 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ai is fucking goooodd

  • @publicanimal
    @publicanimal หลายเดือนก่อน

    Stockfish 16.1 prefers the move that you said is "beyond computers" at a search depth of about 20, rather than the depth of 40 that you claimed. So you are either being disingenuous or you are using an older variant of Stockfish.

    • @Corteum
      @Corteum หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Or maybe he's using an online version of SF which isnt as strong as the UCI one. Or maybe his using an older computer

    • @squareonechess6939
      @squareonechess6939  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm using Stockfish 17 which was suggesting Ne5 at depth 26 -- but it thought both moves favored white until depth 37 or something like that -- The fact that Fischer's move led to total equality was "beyond" it for the average amount of time available for each move in this game.

    • @Corteum
      @Corteum หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Are you using stockfish locally via a chess gui, or are you using the online version on lichess?

  • @winyfredcarlos506
    @winyfredcarlos506 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Disgusted by the video's title

    • @Galasso-0
      @Galasso-0 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wym?

    • @garys5175
      @garys5175 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      why?

    • @vikas4276
      @vikas4276 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same bro, I watched full video thinking that fischer would somehow comeback and now i am feeling some kind of fool myself. This is some very disgusting clickbait. Never come this channel again.