UFO Propulsion discovered? NASA Engineer unveils Antigravity Drive!!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 เม.ย. 2024
- Last week, a NASA engineer unveiled a propellantless drive capable of overcoming gravity! Is this discovery for real?
Has UFO Propulsion been decipherEd?
#space #alien #uap
Please support my channel!
DISCORD MEMBERSHIP, EXCLUSIVE CONTENT AND EARLY RELEASES PLUS 15% OFF MERCH!
/ angryastronaut
www.paypal.com/paypalme/Angry...
Follow me on twitter:
/ astro_angry - บันเทิง
Absolutely… they don’t break the laws of physics. They are capable of utilizing aspects of physics that we don’t yet understand.
And how do you know that?
@@baarnibecause he’s not arrogant enough to think we know all there is to know about physics
@@teslar1 But he’s arrogant enough to assume that we don’t …🫤
@@baarniNewton was a genius, but Einstein improved on his work, the latest quantum theorists are working on the shortcomings of Einstein's theories. There are things that our current understanding of physics can not explain.
A fundamental rule of this game is as soon as someone says god did it everyone packs up their work and goes fishing.
@@anthonywood7420 what is an example of something our current understanding of physics can’t explain? Your premise is flawed.
It's very simple we don't understand physics the way we think we do...
Yes..University education only allows for 'Accepted Principles'...Step outside them and you'll be disowned by your 'Peers'....
Yes we do, just you don't.
Expressed in a slightly different way, there is far more we don't know, than what we do. Our understanding and our models are incomplete.
@@pakviroti3616 You're way overstating incomplete. The models work. However, if and until you got a better idea, we're sticking with what we got so far.
@@mimetype YEAH!!!
Interesting video, reminds me of a story told by a former coworker. He was working at a copper forging company. One day was working on an internal plant power feeder. Can’t remember the voltage but was definitely 69kv or higher. He was told that a different employee at the plant was upset the feeder was out of service and had said he was going to personally turn the power back on. My friend said he nearly flipped out at the idea of someone ignoring the lockout tags and went to stop the guy as the feeder lines had been bonded together and grounded for a safety clearance. On his way to the switchboard the guy managed to close the breaker. The breaker exploded and luckily no one was hurt. He said the EMF field that pulsed thru the feeder to ground was so strong it picked up every particle of dust in the plant from every possible surface and levitated it into the air. He was also lifted and dropped onto the ground from the force. The dust in the air was thicker than any smoke he had ever experienced. So that be said when the forces are strong enough, even things that aren’t typically considered to be magnetically reactive can be manipulated.
Damn
sounds about right, but dunno.
That would have been something to see
69k nice
The key word in "lock out, tag out" is "lock." If you control key access, no idiot can electrocute you. Themselves, not a problem.
What you’re talking about in this video isn’t an anti-gravity drive, it’s an electrostatic drive.
Yes, the anti gravity works completely different, and is also known for over 100 years now. Still waiting for material science to cope....
No, this is another force found operating in the asymmetric capacitor, electrostatic wind will not operate in vacuum. This force has been tested in NASAs vacuum chamber successfully. This causes a distortion of space itself, a warp bubble, the principle of an Alcubierre drive. There is no gravity inside a warp bubble since it is outside of normal space therefore there are no G forces from motion or change of motion since there is no motion of the ship relative to the bubble. There is not only no propellent there is also no fuel. Once charged the capacitors maintain a distorting force on the shape of space without discharging in the process. This describes constant acceleration for years as long as the capacitor is kept charged without the use of fuel or propellent. In under a year and a half at 1.5 G equivalent acceleration you would exceed light speed. There is no limit to the rate of acceleration inside the bubble since there are no G forces operating there.
@@joeheeney4821 it's pretty hard to get a true vacuum --- even the moon has kind of an atmosphere --- as for our solar system there is a measurable solar wind although light from the sun would give more thrust ---- by a strict definition not even electrons would be allowed as they have mass --- not even light and that includes heat
So... pretty much what Jordan described.
@@joeheeney4821 "There is no limit to the rate of acceleration inside the bubble since there are no G forces operating there"
Cool. So it's an anti-gravity drive.
They do not defy the laws of physics. They defy our current minuscule understanding of physics.
YES Exactly Correct !!
Correct NO ONE can !! Physics ARE PHYSICS PEROID !
Angry- Look up the work of Thomas Townsend Brown (T.T. Brown) and his patents on 'electrogravitic' propulsion. The focus was on high voltage DC potential across conductive plates separated by a dielectric medium in geometries that created an asymmetry in charge density, thus leading to measurable forces, including in a vacuum. NEVERMIND! I jumped the gun and you were ahead of the game! Keep up the good work!
That is who Buhler stole the entire concept from and pretended to invent the process 64 years after Brown actually did it. Either way the ion stream was way too power hungry and inefficient to be of any use and the technique isn't used in ion motors today. No, ion power has nothing to do with the mythical imaginary term "antigravity."
In a vacuum, huh? There has to be a published paper on that, or a reproducible result from a lab somewhere. I personally don't believe that, or any of the other crap reaction-less propulsion systems that have been invented, but don't work in the lab, under strict experimental testing.
This is all woo-science for the gullible.
if you generate big enough voltages everything around will become polarized, magnetized or ionized. Obviously you will see a lot of measurable forces even if you put your experiment in vacuum.
@@DominikPlaylists And where is this high voltage DC power coming from? What possible use is a bunch of polarized, magnetized and ionized stuff flying around randomly? lol
_"NEVERMIND! I jumped the gun and you were ahead of the game! Keep up the good work!
"_ You mean Jordan found that Buhler was only duplicating the failed work of Brown in 1960, 64 years age, and went with his video ANYWAY?
"You cant break the laws of physics, but you CAN bend them." - a quote i heard somewhere.
Probably a scifi movie
You cannot break the laws of physics, but we don’t know the laws of physics. We just have theories that mostly seem to work for practical applications.
@@jamescarter8311 You've no idea what theory means do you.
Laws are meant to be broken. We just don't understand how to break them...YET!
I said it one time while intoxicated
BTW, flying toward the center of the galaxy at (near) the speed of light has some impressive hazards. Good luck with that,.
Scientific journals and magazines were talking about "cracking the code" to gravity and antigravity back in the 1940s-60s then just all of a sudden stopped publishing anything about it. They definitely knew something back then and have had something since atleast the mid 50s in my opinion. 🤔
Before the wright brothers!
It was from Casimir effect discovered in 1946. This effect is essential for the understand of warping.
That's because of the American official secrets act of 1950.
Thousands of patents, if not far more, have been classified top secret by the United States government since the act was put into law, including, but not limited to, devices with demonstrated "antigravity" properties, as well as devices that tap into the zero point energy field, offering scaleable unlimited energy on demand.
They can classify and bury any patents deemed to be in conflict with the "interests of the nation" forever.
And we know thanks to the lobbying of corporations in politics that the "interests of the nation" revolve around keeping the rich, and their corporations, rich at any cost to the benefit of the general public...
Theories of Everything with Curt J. did a video about that time and referenced how all public discussion just abruptly ended. There were some high money rollers that bankrolled research on gravity that was initially public then went underground. Fascinating stuff.
While this new drive is a very exiting development, it still does not show how UFO's pull of 90deg turns at full speed. With this drive the occupants will still be crushed at extremely high G's. The only type of drive that can overcome G forces is an artificial Gravity field drive which pulls equally on the occupants as well as the ship so occupants feel zero Gs when accelerating. Only problem is no one knows how to build one.
Who said these are piloted from the air?
Another thing, I doubt most of them are even physical objects.
I would think the majority are just 3d holograms and such.
Smoke and mirrors.
I don't think they fully understand their own technology yet.
Let alone possess the capability to generate artificial Gs.
Some day we probably will.
If we don't die first 😂
Ask SunkWorks, they know how!
@@alexashworth3119 You critizise his rational thought out point, with abstract fantasies.
It would probably mean that gravity is not what we think it is...
Hypothetical Example: Virtual particles are everywhere, I'll called them VPs for short. Tiny little vibrations that are or cannot be actual particles for whatever reason (don't ask me, LMAO). Let's say that each of those VPs typically orient randomly, and like magnetic domains in metal crystals, they cancel each other out...
SO what if "visible matter" affects the VPs orientation to some degree... Could 'field lines' be related? Gravity waves being large scale oscillations of that VP'medium... You get the point... That it would not be anti-gravity, but reorientation of that .. err VP feild.. feild of VPs? Don't ask me, lol, it would use a term similar to that in magnetic effects, even if the 2 are generated in separate ways... At least then I could 'entanglement' and the Quantum Eraser have a source.... maybe even explain it that has a higher tops speed than C, as it would not be against whatever a fill particle would be when not in the "VPs excited state"(the moment it bubbles up in the 'quantum foam of space')
JUst saying, may be we've been looking at it all wrong, and Dark Energy, Dark Matter, Gravity ect, have an single answer, even if teh VPs come in different flavours... After-all, it's not as if we've been able to study such VPs in exquisite detail, is it?
@@solanumtinkr8280 Einstein was right to think about light when he considered gravity.
But what good is a big book filled with information if you have no grasp on what the words all mean?
Him and all these people don't have a knowledge problem they have a pride problem. Pride makes people stupid.
They only believe in what they can observe. Which we know since forever that the world is not made of things you can see but things you can't.
Good on you for thinking outside of the box.
👍 🇺🇸
It is not that this technology (anti-gravity) “defies” the laws of physics that we are familiar with. It still utilizes and stays within the laws of physics just fine, it is just that we don’t understand how it relates to the physics we understand. This is something that will have to either be explained to us by entities that use it or we will have to learn this and pass this knowledge on to humanity as a whole.
Quantum gravity has everything to do with it.
I'm studying ball lightning at MFMP on YT with Bob Greenyer. Natural, and artificial with aspects of transmutation in addition to cancelling mass. Best.
And we have to have the layered 'Meta material' to apply any new understanding to..
There are physics that we’re familiar with, not laws. We don’t know the laws of physics. We just have theories that mostly seem to work for practical applications.
We know exactly how it works, Its a pitifully inefficient ion engine. Ion engines aren't antigravity, they don't bend or break the laws of physics. Tagging "antigravity" onto this really poor ion thruster isn't enough to travel to the 7-Eleven.
Wake me up when they're sending a prototype into orbit.
Okay Rip Van Winkle. 😉
I enjoy your alien bulletins. There's almost no good content in this genre, and when the news cycle is slow the other channels will spin up any drivel and click bait that comes to their imagination. This channel offers legitimate discussion based on science and testimonial from experts in the field. Very impressive, keep up the good work. I've stopped watching just about all the other channels that cover this situation including News Nation because they're really insulting the intelligence of their audience with their most recent offerings. Cheers 🥂
_"There's almost no good content in this genre, "_ And there still isn't any.
Not seeing people again would make me hesitate to leave in the first place. Theres people here worth sticking around for.
Townesend Brown. a well documented early experimenter in High voltage electrostatics .
1.21 gigawatts Brown?
Electrogravitics= TT Brown + victor schauberger + a power source = humanity saving product
they rotate liquid mercury inside pipes around the anti grav engine
not sure why cos im stupid af but apparently its true
@@SHERMA.thats sort of the usual description of the ‘nazibell’ experiments. dr Farrell writes about it and Lavendra
exactly, theyre ralking about electrostatics and assymetric capacitors...thats known as a Gravitor and was created by Brown a loooong time ago.
@@SHERMA.the mercury creates a toroidal shaped gravity well in front of the vortex drive and Pulls the engine/craft into it, while everything they use now expels something out the rear to Push, a true anti gravity system will negate the gravity, creating a void which everything(the craft) around it rushes into, not create its own gravity to "propel" a craft.
No, it equals a giant fraud with no use at all. Modern ion motors don't use unsymmetrical capacitors.
….So it’s the Biefield-Brown effect?
Yep. Been here for a long time.
Close, but the method they are using is a bit different. That being said the results are the same.
Yes, a woefully inefficient ion motor. That's all Buhler has. He also has a cash vacuum pump if he can drum up a few more victims.
14:50
@@Denyernator thanks! I was listening and somehow it skipped when I lost signal.
Beifeld Brown effect. Classic.
Still need a replicator, matter transporter, warp drive engine, as well as dilithium.
A step in the right direction and while Impulse drive is better than nothing, its just not that much better...
And riker's signature chairmove
We may already have Star Trek-esque Replicators in the form of Electron Microscopes. Apparently they have been observed pushing atoms together. Google it "Electron Microscopes seen filling in cracks on a crystal" from The Debrief. TH-cam doesn't allow links.
I think unobtainium would do a better job than dilithium 😁
Actually, unobtainium is a pretty suitable name for the negative mass needed for the suggested Alcubierre drive.
We need to find the 'graviton' first....then we can make an anti-graviton emitter....🤔
Exactly! Our limited understanding of the laws of nature...There is so much to know...
Exactly. Anything utilizing forces we have not yet discovered or ones that we do no fully understand is not violating anything we know.
And how much do we really know...?
@@marcosolo6491 I think you either recognize the fact that huge leaps in our understanding that are forcing a general rethink of long held beliefs or not. What you think...what I think...won't change that fact.
@@falstaff59 Understanding doesn't grow by huge leaps.
More UFO/UAP content please 👍🏽
Thats the Biefeld-Brown effect - look up Lifters
Not quite, but very similar! Regardless the basic idea is almost 100 years old!
T Townsend Brown. 100 years ago. Asymmetric charges with I think a strong negative charged leading edge. He was simulating UFOs in a gym using this approach and then the US Military confiscated it
Electrostatic forces aren’t antigravity
Antigravity is not possible under general relativity
A thousand thrumbs-up for you penetrating the bullschnitzel to arrive at a truth that will be attacked by all these alien enthusiast wishful thinkers.
Keeping the electric charges separate requires a power source. The power source would be an engine burning fuel and creating exhaust. It would be more efficient to dispense with the electrostatic component and just use the engine exhaust to propel the ship forward.
No actually this thing uses a direct current battery. I suppose you could turn it in a Frankenstein Monster with a powered generator. But it's already woefully inefficient.
@@RockinRobbins13 What kind of battery can propel a ship thru space? Maybe an RC airplane for a few minutes.
@@mikefeierberg7712 Nuclear?
Seems like you'd need an immense amount of power.
@@mikefeierberg7712 _"What kind of battery can propel a ship thru space? "_ My point exactly. This thing is a scam.
Similar, but more complicated, to how a sail propels a sailboat with regard to pressure. It is the negative pressure on the leeward side of the sail that "pulls" the boat, not the wind "pushing".
yes, it is a similar thing with an ordinary airplane, lift is vacuum powered.
@@grandrapids57 Actually, no, vacuums or low pressures don't suck. The energy comes completely from the normal pressure air behind the sail, wing, propeller or any similar device. You produce a pressure difference. The high pressure drives the surface it's against away, toward the lower pressure until the two pressures equalize.
Laminar scaler flow. Dolphins use hydraulic laminar flow in front of cargo ships to save energy as they swim by moving their tail in a circular fashion in front of the bow of the boat. To make that a scaler function you need space, negative gain and a mass, which would be hydrogen. And your universe is 78% hydrogen, just so you know.
@@RockinRobbins13 Ah, now Is the lower pressure side less than 1 atm or at 1 atm?
@@magnitudematrix2653 The universe is not 78% hydrogen. More accurately, the masses that comprise the universe contain 78% hydrogen (whether by weight or volume, I have no idea, as I'm just adjusting your claim slightly).
If this is true, new era soon begin. However i like to know and see more before i buy that.
If ifs and butts were candy and nuts we'd all have a Merry Christmas!
It was about time for another sunglasses video. Thanks for putting these together.
Everytime you do the "Right now", I'll comment saying how much i love it haha
😎 🌌🚀 ❗❗
Why not start another channel "The Angry Saucer".
Perhaps 'The saucy saucer'
Apparently, we don't actually understand the laws of the universe. We're just arrogant and think we understand them?
Most scientists readily admit that we don't understand the laws of physics. We have useful approximations in the form of equations which fit the observations we've made thus far
@@severeonboth don't fit together when talking about the big and small.
@@zeusdarkgod7727 exactly! We know our equations don't work for the whole of reality
No, that's not it at all. You are a victim of fraud here: word salad meaning precisely nothing. Pay your money and reap your just reward.
How we suppose to make that change when physics professors still express nutons law gravity to the center of earth core which is liquid metal and has no meginetic gravity . The same professor that has a magnetron in his cell phone AND HAS NO DAMN IDEA WHAT A MAGNETRON DOES .
We are suffering from grotesque stupidity ! 17:02
While it can't be seen here, the object in the image at 7:55-8:15 is structurally reminiscent of TT Brown's design shown later. It also resembles the photographs that George Adamski claimed were of UFOs. Basically, it looks like a light fixture or chick incubator. The image at 7:55 was used as a sample in developing a method for estimating object size and distance in photographs, where depth of field could be determined from lens characteristics. The paper discussing this was published in an engineering society journal in the early '70s.
I like your straight forward and common sence approach to trying to understand these subjects.
When did that happen? Would be quite a surprise to me.
I think shiny saucers theme would probably go well with the static electric propulsion concept. Considering stainless steel has electro magnetic properties. I also believe I read somewhere that silver infused aluminum has some interesting electrical properties.
Yes, but mass has inertia, and the toys that these eccentric weirdos were playing with cannot deal with that.
Yes, but mass has inertia, and the toys that these eccentric weirdos were playing with cannot deal with that.
Yes, but mass has inertia, and the toys that these eccentric weirdos were playing with cannot deal with that.
@@mauricegold9377 if you have anti gravity that would cancel out inertia wouldn't it ? Or maybe they could just reverse the polarity of the electric field.
@@bradleyford117 More flux capacitors, vicar?
I have a simpler idea. Put a sail on the front of a ship and put a fan on the back of the ship, and the fan will blow on the sail and propel the ship forward.
In this case, I think they’re just putting a fancy fan on the boat pointing backwards.
mm what if we put the sail on top of the boat then point the fan upwards .
Yes, that concept has always been good for a laugh, and some sad people believe it works. it doesn't.
Fantastic. I love that stuff, awesome show today !
UFO Speed only 362 MPH?! They've been clocked going MUCH faster than that!!!
Only works in an atmosphere(experiment cited force in vacuum is too small)Thomas brown was only able to levitate charged plates for a few minutes. Not enough force to be practical.
The method here is different so it will need to be tested in a vacuum! They are not relying on ionic wind for propulsion in this case so more tests will need to be done!
@@mikesmicroshop4385 According to both Buhler and Brown they ARE relying on ionic thrust for propulsion here and the most they've been able to produce is 1 gram.
Recall Magnepan Magnaplanar loudspeakers. I think they were electrostatic using this principle
I recall some babble back in the 1980's that focused speakers were going to revolutionize advertising in grocery stores. Since that, nada.
They weren't. I had Magneplar 1.4s. Now Quad loudspeakers from England were electrostatic.
Brown patented several electrostatic propulsion devices. His designs all had the top and bottom charged one positive and one negative with a dielectric medium between! Here they seem to be only charging one side! This would definitely increase the electrostatic pressure difference between the two. Interesting I will have to go back and test some of my devices in this fashion.
Do you mean the electric wind, electrostatic forces, and slight pressure differential?
I love the idea of angry-aliens doing a bulletin on an Earthling’s TH-cam channel!
Many years ago I was outside with a neighbor girl one night. Persieds had been recently and we were still looking for an occasional meteor, laying back on the hood of the car. We saw two stars switch positions. Circular path like on a wheel. "Did you see that?" She said "yeah...I'm going home now"
I stayed and watched a long time, they never moved again, I checked every time I went out at night...there was a hill and tree line so I knew where they were.
A few years later, Close Encounters came out...the ufos did the constellation thing and I went HAH!
Y'mean UFO stuff bores chicks away?
@@mimetype She was scared.
@@2painful2watch Strange that lay people see these weird things all the time and 50 year amateur astronomers don't. I guess it's part of being an expert on the sky that the UFOs know to avoid your eyesight.
@@RockinRobbins13Oh, they do!. Many cases documented of multiple eye witnesses for which a few did not see it while others did and described what they had seen consistently in separate interviews. my view is their cloaking tech cannot shield some consciousness of some humans.
@@fteoOpty64 Multiple eyewitnesses with no skills to provide evidence, while scientists and astronomers see nothing of the sort. If these figments of the imagination were real billions of cell phones would have clear, unmistakable photos and there wouldn't be any question. Alien spacecraft would be like clouds: universally accepted.
No way this actually works.
I like that you ended in time dilation. It is a major part of the key to how this stuff works, and how “they” work, I believe.
Weiter immer weiter. Du wirst es schon schaffen. Grüße aus dem Saarland. Support ist kein Mord
Thanks Salvator Pais
I was thinking about him and how this might relate to his patents with the US government. He was on "Theories of Everything" with Curt Jaimungal. I'm not really good enough at math and physics to understand how all this is supposed to work or if it could work on a craft, not just in theory. We probably also need a big amount of electricity, right?
Why are you thanking Pais for?
He hasn't invented anything. He has merely rediscovered work already discovered thousands of times by as many people over the past century.
Most killed by the government and their work stolen to keep the technology out of the hands of the public...
I'm really missing one or two links to the source of your report, at least a link to the text you are quoting in the video. Also showing all the UFO footage while talking about the Exodus Drive doesn't make sense - it's only a distraction. Rather show the text or some graphs which are related to what you talk about like for example at 15:12.
Besides of that the Exodus Drive is very interesting indeed. I hope it's not again something like the EM Drive which surfaced 3 or 4 years ago and then vanished again without really working. Thanks for the video!
Yeah...unfortunately, there really isn't any public diagrams or illustrations on Edidus, so I used what I had.
@@TheAngryAstronaut I was googling a bit and there is a presentation from Charles Buhler with several photos and diagrams in this video: "APEC 12/23: Asymmetrical Capacitance, Warp Drives & Torsion Physics". Thanks for the reply!
I do agree that some of the images that float around while hes talking are distracting, but i am almost always only listening
Edit: I'm talking about the images before the main topic starts, the images that go with the topic are typically 🔥
I like the videos. They’re performing what he’s talking about lol
Simply call it EM-Drive 2: grandiose claims with maybe even NASA signing on for a test. Not a gram of thrust produced and it will turn out to be a simple unbalanced capacitor making a puny, inefficient ion stream posing fraudulently as "antigravity." Then everybody will be shocked and astounded. Fraud is rampant and we have to learn not to fall for it. Wishful thinking is not science.
To me it sounds like what the patent explains as a difference in voltage on the surface of the craft is like the aerofoil design of a wing. More pressure on one side and less pressure on the opposing side, and you'll push craft in the direction of the lower pressure side. The craft is simply taking the path of least resistance.
No, this craft has a really crappy and inefficient ion motor.
For what it's worth when I was 14, in Oliver Springs TN, a friend and I witnessed a saucer come from INSIDE a mountain on the next range, it stopped and it felt like we were in an elecro static field, the hairs on the nape of my neck were standing up like needles. The craft then slowly slides back into the mountain. Keeping in mind this is near Secret City. ❤
I really don't understand the people saying that these uaps are breaking laws of physics just because they're able to move around they're not going faster than the speed of light or anything so what's the big deal lol 😂
They appear to not obey inertial restrictions perhaps. If you're going very fast in one direction, then suddenly go in another direction, you would typically need to change your velocity vector gradually or your crew is pulp. In fact, every time you change direction that's an acceleration.
So e.g. Mach 1 due north, then dead stop? How? Beyond the crew being dead, we have no known aerodynamic mechanism to shed that much speed that quickly - neither air brakes, nor retro rockets, nothing whatever. What's more, we have no known physics which address how to to so. That's what they mean when they say the UAPs seemingly flout physical laws.
It's things like accelerating, and turning, so suddenly that any Human occupant would be pulverised by the G-forces.
Show us proof of anything doing any of that. All these dumb claims have been debunked to death. None of them do anything except fly in straight lines and all behave exactly as any number of earth bound flying craft or animal would.
Can we at least get the mesh uniforms the crew members wore in the TV series "UFO" (1970-1971)?
Uh-oh the sunglasses are on, this can only mean one thing.
Apparently you only need to charge the plate of the capacitor once and replace any charge that leaks off which is a slow process so you wouldn't need any advanced antimatter or fusion device to reach the Stars. It's kind of like you charge a magnet once when you make it and it stays a magnet for a very long time
Who needs scientists when you have eccentric unschooled unmarried amateurs in their bedrooms playing with electrostatic lifters?
Fascinating. Once you get past the power output or energy used you start to generate Torsion fields and their effects of anti-gravity. What also is interesting is this is the first patent for propulsion that has zero use for known propellent rocket fuels. There is but one way to completely beat Space X and that is the development of energy anti-gravity craft and the implementation of them. There have been many in the past but this is the first patent of a known NASA mind being taken seriously. Why, and why now? Or is this a way to divulge this new/hidden, already in existence technology to the world? Hard to say but they seem to be treating is as if it's the first they've ever heard or experimented with this kind of propulsion technology.
Saying it is another species is an assumption in the extreme. It may be an older batch of humans doing this, there has been enough time on this planet for at least one to pull this off.
Love your show
you just don’t need the silly music. You’re legit. Does the news have music behind it? It makes it cheesy like an infomerrcial
keep doing what you do.
Luv ya !!
When they figure out how gravity works. The skys the limit. The fancy new elements only go so far.
This drive reminds me of the power system in the Nautilus from Jules Verne's 20,000 Leagues under the Sea.
Electrostatics forces are a several hundred magnitudes to weak to move a craft like UAP do ! Radar report show same UAP going to orbite et come back to see level many times in less than a hour !!
Only your science fiction limited mind would assume this. There are yet undetermined and maybe even not yet discovered ways of applying this. All you need is a theory to put into some form of practical use, then find ways to perfect it or apply it to whatever the goal is. Limited brains puts down barriers because they don't understand. You're obviously not any sort of authority that would have a clue ... neither am I, but I recognize there's a ways to go for practical use and am not willing to limit that based on assumptions based on complete and total cluelessness.
Ha, depends on how strong a field can be made....
@@billschara5667 Not science fiction ! it a prooved fact by science since centuries: Electrostatics forces are a several hundred tausend magnitudes to weak to move a craft to space and back to earth !! UAP can not move with insignifiantly week eletrostatique push the way US SPACE defense recorded them !
@@MichaelWinter-ss6lxeven on lifter with 20 000 volt you can lift only a few gramme + inside power source would be 10000 times to heavy !!
Electromagnetic fields propulsion/repulsion is the solution for space travel however I did not think it would be possible until recently when the idea of creating a neutral field was illustrated, which can be done externally.
I believe that there is currently such a vehicle that is being tested however it is pretty slow.
The description says this will work in a vacuum. It may work in an atmosphere as well, but can it overcome the resistance of the atmosphere without the friction and sonic boom, as UAP have been observed doing?
Townsend Brown.
Facts been around for decades!
@@Truthrevealed4022 Ya, I typed that before Angry got there. Around 1989 or 90 in my E-mag theory class we looked into it as a project. There is something in rotating the anode plate, both plates needed to be concave and facing each other. We couldn't get the math to work. But it was just a project in an undergrad class.
@@tim1883 💰😂🎰
💯
Fun fact: gravity isn't a force.
End of UFO story.
likely true, but still able to help bend light or at least able modify the fabric that the light travels along.
Then what is it I saw as a young man in my early 20's? Because it damn sure wasn't anything natural in the sky that looked man made 😂😂😂
But the gravity field can still be warped. Without negativ energy or other fantasy products. It still will require something other for propulsion, and this might be it.
That is why we can't figure it out. Gravity is a force. Einstein was working on unifying gravity and magnetism until the day he died.
They are separate but they are intertwined. He was on the right track and seems most people have just decided Einstein's work was complete, which was the opposite of his goal.
Fact True probably. Conclusion false.
Thankyou for covering this! This is important! I mean this is amazing! if true this could revolutionize space travel and change the future for the better Immeasurably.
As I was zooming in to see the pin on your lapel when the reflection in your glasses caught my eye. I'm well aware that you recently became and expat. which becomes abundantly clear (that you recently moved) when looking at the reflection. Using a kitchen/dining chair as a stand for your vid cam and your piles of belongings stacked behind the chair are a dead give-away. Not calling you out, just wanted you to be aware, so you can avoid accidentally reflecting something "top secret" (top secret to you at least) lol, in the future.
They are here and it baffles me the secrecy or denial is still being pushed by the status quo.
The Band? Status Quo?
You have to try to put yourself in their shoes and ask:
What truth about aliens would warrent the government (any government) to want hide their existence from people?
The first possible answer is to prevent chaos, but I think that's less and less likely.
2nd possibility is to prevent people from realizing that certain beleifs may have been right all along. The existence of aliens you would think would disprove many religions, but what if these aliens have appearances similar to creatures depicted by many religions? Angels, demons, and many more could actually be confirmed to exist as extraterrestrial life. That would shake up the world system like never before
Not ontological shock, not riots, not upsetting religious dogma… the gov will not reveal being subservient to a higher power; ET or not.
you just need to generate 1 newton of thrust. hell even 1/2 or 1/10th just 1000x over noise or heat / weird micro electromagnetic anomalies. but they never do. its always 1/10000ths of a newton that a fart from a mosquito could produce.
Interesting, and its fun to speculate, but: You have 100's of kV DC on high voltage transmission wires on the electrical grid. The power supplied to the cables is immense. The ground below is electrically grounded. Why don't such cables fly away, if this propulsion method is accurate?
Sounds like a Conjoiner Drive from Alistair Reynolds' Revelation Space series (the best near lightspeed space ship conceptualization I've come across in hard scifi and space opera. He also gives a great description of the sheer pucker factor of traveling at near lightspeed, which help you visualize it in your minds eye like no other contemporary scifi author that I've come across. If you love space and science fiction, you simply have to read Alistair Reynolds novels. I hope they make more of his stories into live action and anime too, like they did for his short stories 'Zima Blue' and 'Beyond the Aquila Rift' in Netflix's 'Love, Death and Robots')
It just occurred to me, the billions-dollar industry that is fueled by “are we alone?” Would go away if that question was answered
Answers haven't stopped flat earthers yet.....
if the answer is no then it 'll be multibillion for obvious reasons. If yes it'll be again multibillion but for more complicated ones.
Billions lol millions sure but billions? Lol name one ufologist that is a billionaire
On the contrary, if it is "officially answer" it will become a trillion dollar industry.
I don't know how you even came to this conclusion.
Just because humans on Earth doesn't understand natural laws of physics doesn't rule out the ability to engineer things to defy laws we understand. Electrostatic is the conversion of gravity when the law of thermodynamics applies...
You cannot defy laws. That’s a contradiction. We don’t know what the laws are.
Electrostatics and gravity are two distinct forces; they have nothing to alter them directly.
@@satanael9260 electrostatic is the decaying version of gravity... It builds up in the earth and is released as lightning. The energy displaced is transfered into spacetime energy allowing for future time to emerge. It's one reason time gets slowed down around a black hole.
A Magnetic projected Arc Plasma could also be used as thrust, at a portion of the speed of light, we could have had this type of thrust 5 years ago!
It sounds to me like the general gist is trying to see if interaction with ambient environmental electric/magnetic fields can somehow be used to lift a craft without needing propellant. It's not "anti gravitation" in the sense of generating gravity that works oppositely to normal gravity, which according to Einstein cannot be done in any other way than to insert negative mass. But it is true that, say, an _inhomogeneous_ magnetic field can indeed operate as a source of thrusting. The trick is that to do so, to push off against a magnetic field like that of the Earth, would require an extreme amount of magnetic field from the craft, and thus an extreme amount of current - I tried to calculate this once and got numbers that suggest current densities well, though not by too many orders of magnitude, in excess of the max saturation for even our best superconductors would be required. (In this regard I tend to wonder if instead of thinking so much about just "room temperature" superconductors we need to also be asking how far we can push the magnetic quench point.) I have not looked at electrostatic fields, though it is so that the charge circulation in Earth's atmosphere does provide some. Again though I suspect that a capacitor or the like with massively higher charge gradients than we ever have achieved is required, because otherwise capacitors would just self-levitate. Nonetheless the question of "how much force can you squeeze out of ambient EM fields if you have access to suitably strong power sources and conductive materials" would be quite interesting to explore in much more rigorous fashion. It also suggests that - and I've thought of this for a while - real spacecraft propulsion is not so much about a singular "wonder drive" as it is about having a "Swiss army knife" of different kinds of engines that can be activated to operate with different media and environmental parameters. This may ideally include all three of atmospheric, electromagnetic, and rocket engines, I'd think, with nuclear energy (probably fusion), and perhaps for mother/capital ships, antimatter, as the central unifying power source. Even if something extraordinary like wormholes turns out to be possible, it is likely they would require so much supporting infrastructure that they would not be fit for mounting directly on a spaceship as a propulsion device.
Gravity is not a force
And that applies to Buhler's Folly how?
1st application would be an actual hoverboard. Back to the Future becomes reality. lol
:)
This leads to the understanding of the illusion of time dilation, where vacuum energy comes from and what 'black holes' really are. Energy is everywhere and what we are really doing is just figuring out ways to access different forms or via new, more efficient processes. One thing to consider with the electrostatic propulsion unit is that its magnetic surfaces must be able to be deformed at will. If one tries to build a 'solid' or rigid construct it will inevitably (and probably quickly) lose efficiency resulting in losing effect and plummeting to the surface or landing and becoming stranded. Besides this you would want to be able to change direction at will and at any heading, so there's that too. This could be accomplished with plasma in magnetic fields. A fission or fusion device could suffice but why not save yourself some money and space and just go zero point? ;-) It's nice to see (hopefully) at this point tech like this can some forward without inventors becoming catastrophically unhealthy or having it socked away under natsec bs. We desperately need some of this tech to deal with what's coming down the pike over the next decade or two. We desperately need decentralized power and mechanically simpler (and less explosive) devices to get over the hump so to speak. And no, it's not climate bs. If you'd like to know it's not hard to find and the journey will be good exercise. Clue: When Ra is in a mood how does one avoid his gaze?
I would totally travel to check out nearby stars, but my wife won't let me. That, and am still waiting for my Cybertruck.
This is the similar to my work. based on Townsend Browns work from the early 80's.
This will work.
Thank you for sharing this information.
Toward the end of the Bluebook project, electrostatic drive was a proposed method of UFO propulsion, but the problem was how to generate enough power to generate the force needed to propel a vehicle. Most observed strong electrostatic forces have been generated by power stations capable of generating a megawatt of power, which is not exactly something you can package in a spacecraft.
The anti gravity patent exists since 2019, the author is Salvador Cesar Pais, the owner is the US Navy and it is free to use and there is a working model.
Cool. Maybe we'll hear more about this in a decade or so.
Or not.
Heck ya. Definitely on rhe right track
Great video, reminds me of that strange exotic material that's been found with lots of atomic layers. You don't suppose this new drive would glow when it's powered up?
Matter antimatter reactors are still burning a fuel that's carried onboard. There must be another way to get power.
Hey i didn't mention Roswell once, doh!
I would look at the Mach Effect thruster which I believe was supposed to have flown on a rocket that blew up recently. This drive using electrostatics which went dark in the late 50's is at the very least already used on the B2. I am not sure but this device might be limited to the Earths EM field, or is limited beyond that, not sure, I just seem to remember something about that. Also it is still slower than just jumping through a doorway of folded space.
What rocket blew up recently?
it sounds like one surface pushes away from the other, so how do you get thrust? what is the electrostatic force pushing away from in a vacuum ?
Could you please put a link to your sources in the show notes? That would help a lot.
AA has found tje holy grail of likes and views, ufo stuff sells. with or without sources. I don't mind, He pushes out descent info in his down-the-earth videos.
Sounds like the EMDrive... Took awhile for them to figure out it was just interacting with earth's magnetic field. The trick is the geometry. AFAIK creating a geometry that produces an asymmetrical force is what we don't know how to do. So far, mathematically, we've only had them sum to 0.
And in orbit, the EMDrive produced no thrust at all. This one might beat the EMDrive by one gram IF (I doubt this) the results announced so far are honest.
Dr. NING LI from MIT, look her up. Watch a few youtube videos about her. She discovered antigravity and was offered work with DARPA then disappeared. She used superconductors and rotating bodies to reduce gravitational force and published peer-reviewed proof.
Absolutely amazing
I've seen how it works. This type of propulsion has first been implemented in Russia's stealth submarines. The propulsion acts similarly to a rail gun but causes the charged medium between rails to become repulsive.
Asymmetric capacitor. There is also asymmetric microwave cavity. It has been talked about and the real deal might be somewhat related to that but I suspect it's too simple to be the holy grail. You can make a video going over specific ET craft shapes which presumably are telling of the underlying physics and gather cases that have effects that are telling. Try to piece together a coherent picture for the audience. For instance Travis Walton's case, the discus craft they see hover, he said was identical to the one he was later brought out of parked in a hangar but half the size. That's most likely the same craft, it just looked smaller in flight due to space time pinch. Bending of light. This light bending is a recurring theme. Some ET craft will look slightly warped, not quite symmetric, once you know you can spot that in some old photos. Some will wink out entirely because your direction of light is bent fully around it. Others report a kind of heat shimmer under them, likely the same bending of light. That they glow at night but look metallic in day could well be corona discharge because the surface is high voltage AC agitated. I figure it's standing EM waves on the hull, a kind of tuning with complex harmonics to invoke the exotic physics they use. The Carlos Diaz photo case in mexico suggests such standing wave lobes. Bob Lazar said there was a high voltage hiss when the craft lifted off the ground that dissipated. Others report a sound from UFOs akin to a bell being agitated, very much like tibetan meditation bowls. You can also observe that these space time warping effects have very short range unlike normal gravity which is 1/rr same as the electric force. So it could be a kind of magnetism style derivative force of gravity. The normal range of gravity is what requires jupiter mass energy to do something significant but with shorter range it might cost very little energy. They certainly do it with ease. Bob Lazar also has a nicely detailed account of working with the demonstration models in the lab with his lab buddy that's very revealing of how fairly exotic it is but at the same time fairly relatable. You can do a video about that alone certainly. The demo devices pinched light right before his eyes and seemingly stopped time in a spot.
The Falcon Lake case where the UFO had a grid vent and it burned a grid pattern on the witness' chest could also indicate some microwave style emission. Same with the Cash Landrum case where the car dash was cooked through the windshield which heat radiation can't do but microwave/radio can. Their bodies were also cooked on the inside and they had medical problems.
Some ET craft also have a spinning section, suggesting that one way to tease out this gravity effect is by forced acceleration of mass in combination with particular electromagnetic stimulation. Physics needs a bridge between EM and G so it all kind of makes sense. I think EM agitation of spinning mass will be the simplest form that works. Some of the more fancy implementations don't bother with spinning anything in a mechanical sense. The most beautiful craft I have heard of are the chrome M&M craft belonging to the nordics that Travis Walton saw in the hangar he was brought out into. I have done an illustration of that scene if you google travis walton hangar. Travis Walton wrote "wow" when I showed it to him because it was so close to what he saw in 1975.
Travis Walton's detailed account also allows us quite detailed predictions about how their home planet is from the environment inside their craft. Say 1.35g gravity, heavy humid low oxygen atmosphere, far more distant from their star than earth, maybe permanently overcast so daytime light levels are about 10000x lower than direct sunlight here. I call them twilight planets. Possibly a red dwarf star but me and GPT4 weren't sure we could conclude that yesterday :) the higher gravity and low light is however certain from his difficulty standing up in the craft and the low light and their huge eyes. He had trouble catching his breath as well. The greys were very light, sort of like how birds have developed to be light with hollow bones etc. Could be cost effectiveness in a higher gravity and low availability of food. Due to the low light. All their food could be plancton like. They have no teeth and no rectum. They excrete through the skin which is slightly gross :) Red dwarf stars can last 1000 times longer than our sun.
I speculate that the typical 10-15meter diameter discus craft will put out a main radio tone around 5-20MHZ that a 20$ SDR radio receiver can pick up from great distance. If true we could make a worldwide detection grid that show their exact location and speed and size and type.
oh and btw, the roswell craft likely fell down because early high power radar was pointed at it, something the military didn't realize until long after. This also speaks to the EM nature of the propulsion and how delicate the resonances they need are. The roswell base was the only nuclear weapons carrying base at the time. think about how unlikely that is except it suddenly makes sense because they had 3 one megawatt radars guarding the airspace. back then it wasn't microwave but longer wavelength around 100MHz, not far from the band I suspect for the smaller craft.
It sounds like blowing into your own sail to me.
i enjoy all of your content!
Love it!
Have you read "Tau Zero"?
How about "To Outlive Eternity"?
Thanks for the content
I made this as a kid. Used foil and polythene to make a pad and then used the HT wire straight from the portable TV to power it. It could move if suspended and laid flat had attraction and lift depending what way up. It couldn't fly but was probably too heavy.
I prefer the phrase "They defy our current understanding of physics".
except there is no law of physics broken. Accelerating faster than the fastest known engine is not exactly breaking any law.
It's his current understanding actually refering to a point below zero on the scale of scientific literacy.
O wow, a Nasa engineer just invented a 'lifter'. People have been building these for decades :P
I'm a bit sorry to do this, Angry Astronaut, (since people might not be able to unsee it!) but: I suggest a bit more care about what's in the room where you're videoing. The round-backed chair in the room, when reflected off of your shades, gives you "crazy eyes!" (Or, maybe they're alien eyes!) I watched the video with a grin since the "eyes" moved as you did. It's fun, so thanks for it! I hope you get a laugh out if it once you see it!
P.S.: I did some booth duty at the Space Symposium and saw you there, although I left you alone!
I like these new sunglasses much better than those wrap around ones! You look more sophisticated