Have you tested differences between using NR first and SR first? I'm curious as to whether it may work better or worse when doing SR first. Also this makes most colour profiles unavailable in Lightroom?
So, you actually don't need Photoshop for this to work at all! Turns out, just saving the image as .tif and then loading that version in Lightroom, you can still do Super Resolution on that. Denoise won't work though, so make sure to do that first. I only figured this out *after* finding your way of even making it work at all, so thanks!
Unfortunately, the super-resolution results achieved through this method are not as effective as those produced when running the super-resolution tool on raw DNG files (using Bayer or X-Trans arrays). This is because both the super-resolution and denoise tools are designed to use mosaic data as inputs for their convolutional network (the AI part), and then output a demosaiced linear RGB DNG. Adobe eventually updated the super-resolution tool to accept processed files (such as JPG, TIFF, etc.) as inputs, but the results are not as optimal as when the tool is applied to the raw mosaic of an unprocessed DNG. Rumors suggest that they are working on a new monolithic tool capable of denoising and resampling using a more comprehensive convolutional network. However, while we await its release, your method still produces more than acceptable results
This works, but you may as well just up-rez in PS. Because although you can do super resolution when it comes back as a .tif, you CANNOT use raw details - and that is the only thing which really makes super resolution different from an ordinary uprezzing program
Super resolution is far superior to any other similar plug in I have tried in the past. They may be upgrading those too, but plug ins are a pain in the butt, you can't keep them current without constant cash outlays.
Awesome tip, just what I was looking for!
Great tip - I often have a noisy image I also want to upscale after cropping. You have got my subscription
Thanks! Glad I could help !
Thanks for posting. Will use as shown.
Thank you! Super!
thank you - they should just fix this!
Great tip....many thanks.
Great tip, many thanks
Mate that is awesome! Thank you for that!!!
Awesome. Thank you!
just what I was looking for, thanks.
Great, simple tip!
I have been doing Denoise and then Sharpen last to great effect also
Have you tested differences between using NR first and SR first?
I'm curious as to whether it may work better or worse when doing SR first.
Also this makes most colour profiles unavailable in Lightroom?
Cool tip !
😮.. thankssss
So, you actually don't need Photoshop for this to work at all!
Turns out, just saving the image as .tif and then loading that version in Lightroom, you can still do Super Resolution on that. Denoise won't work though, so make sure to do that first.
I only figured this out *after* finding your way of even making it work at all, so thanks!
How do I do this only in PS?
When from Ps back to LrC and use super resolution, file become DNG and enhance Super resolution is workable.
Didnt work. The edit.tif file was not eligible for LRC denoise.
As I said in the video - you have to do denoise on the raw file first. Super resolution will work on the tiff.
Unfortunately, the super-resolution results achieved through this method are not as effective as those produced when running the super-resolution tool on raw DNG files (using Bayer or X-Trans arrays). This is because both the super-resolution and denoise tools are designed to use mosaic data as inputs for their convolutional network (the AI part), and then output a demosaiced linear RGB DNG. Adobe eventually updated the super-resolution tool to accept processed files (such as JPG, TIFF, etc.) as inputs, but the results are not as optimal as when the tool is applied to the raw mosaic of an unprocessed DNG.
Rumors suggest that they are working on a new monolithic tool capable of denoising and resampling using a more comprehensive convolutional network. However, while we await its release, your method still produces more than acceptable results
This works, but you may as well just up-rez in PS. Because although you can do super resolution when it comes back as a .tif, you CANNOT use raw details - and that is the only thing which really makes super resolution different from an ordinary uprezzing program
Super resolution is far superior to any other similar plug in I have tried in the past. They may be upgrading those too, but plug ins are a pain in the butt, you can't keep them current without constant cash outlays.