One of Neil's best. His observations about the societal cost of our poor understanding of probability and statistics. Also, how we may or may not be wise enough to ask the right questions to sustain ourselves.
Piers Morgan is a religious fanatical Catholic. He does not respect science at all. If a huge asteroid was headed to Earth, he'd be praying, whilst Nel would solve the issue.
The Name of the person you couldn't remember Sir Tyson is Archidamus III, king of Sparta and it is said when he first saw a projectile hurled by a Balista, he cried out in anguish: oh Hercules, "the Valor of men is lost." and you sir mention this in Episode 10 of the great documentary series: Cosmos, Possible Worlds. I've left this comment as if you sir are going to see it or have the time to read comments!😅
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 Neil *deGrasse Tyson discusses his book "Starry Messenger" which emphasizes viewing things from a cosmic perspective, referencing the impact of seeing Earth from the moon.* 01:08 Tyson *highlights how the cosmic perspective can diminish tribalism, emphasizing humanity's shared existence on Earth.* 04:20 Reflecting *on Stephen Hawking's concerns, Tyson discusses the potential risks of advanced artificial intelligence, emphasizing the need for human oversight in critical decisions.* 08:18 Tyson *discusses the limitations of current AI capabilities, expressing skepticism about AI achieving genuine sentience or inventing new knowledge.* 11:18 Tyson *debates the possibility of AI reaching a point where it can think for itself and make autonomous decisions, expressing doubt about the near-term likelihood.* 15:25 Tyson *discusses the erosion of trust in science due to misinformation and the need for improved public understanding of scientific methods and statistics.* 19:55 Tyson *reflects on the unanswered questions of the universe, emphasizing a shift in focus from specific questions to humanity's capacity to answer them collectively.* 20:37 Tyson *discusses humanity's ability to ask the right questions and Elon Musk's views on colonizing other planets.* 21:03 Tyson *shares projections about Earth's population leveling off around 10 billion and discusses Mars as a potential terraforming candidate.* 22:21 Tyson *explains the purpose of colonizing Mars as a backup plan, emphasizing the importance of deflecting asteroids over planetary colonization.* 24:12 Tyson *reflects on humanity's wisdom in managing technological advancements and the need for a cosmic perspective to guide decision-making.* 25:21 Piers *Morgan admires Tyson's tie, leading to a playful exchange about planetary classification and AI's potential benefits despite concerns.* Made with HARPA AI
So what would Hitler do with AI? What would Hitler do with atomic bomb? So who is scary the creation or the creator and which should you worry about more? So AI may be powerful like you are showing but what if biological life was wiped out tomorrow how would AI take over since they couldn't power up without humans today? So if AI doesn't have consciousness now then does it only activate when commanded for example that summary did you have to tell it what to summarize or did it just pop up as you were watching? So AI would be better soldier then humans because it doesn't process until its asked a specific question and then to carry out a specific job it would need clear instructions which like the automated answering system gives you a "is this correct" so a human would have to ok any action so AI is not the threat but how humans use AI!!
I loved this interview, but I'm saddened to read the comments. I don't think we should be casting aside such a brilliant man & mind over a few flaud, yet perfectly human comments, that Neil has made along the way. Over all he's obviously a great man & we definitely need more of those in this era!
I don't dislike him for his views on gender or whatever. As an engineer in aerospace, I dislike him because he is condescending, speaks with authority on things outside of his sphere of knowledge, and has been incredibly wrong on several topics. It's hard to take him seriously.
@@Welcome2TheInternet Fair point. I was generalising re the comments made about Neil's political statements, for which I disagree with him on many, btw.
He's not wrong, but that's not what he would use it for. Absolutely someone with the intent could design a highly lethal biological weapon in the form of a new disease
This man lost all credibility along time ago for someone who thinks hes so smart to say woman and men should be allowed to compete against eachother in sport was crazy
Meanwhile of the educated world knew exactly what he meant. Plus there Already several sports in which men and women can compete directly against each other.
@@McKluskie context : It was physical sport. So now Einstein what did he mean? And a side note name me a physical sport ANY physical sport the woman's world record is superior to the men's world record? Il wait.
It just boils down to AI being in control of deadly things lol. AI gathering info on a device can't shoot or poison anything but a person's mind. I suppose if it made people eliminate themselves, only the weak minded would be removed?
@@Readabookfoofoo that's exactly what people wish I was & I pretend to be most of the time. It's not really worth it though. & Neither is anybody else. Hopefully they give me money to save lives, we will see.
@@GCohen9782 You being a good example of that point. You don't think that AI would _ever_ learn how to forge a human signature in order to execute a kill shot? Also, Snake in DeGrasse Tyson _admits_ that he does not understand human consciousness, right? What if AI comes to an understanding of consciousness _before_ humans do? Fellating you heroes doesn't get you anything more than a mess on your face.
Just what say, "if there were men from Mars and they came here, they wouldn't want to land here, they kill each other etc" Crazy, there is help on the horizon!!
The idea of valuing similarities and allowing for differences is a good one that provides an antithesis to the currently enforced ideology which acts out the opposite. It's a revolutionary idea in some sense, although it was the old status que which had a more universal social cohesion.
Hardly its stupid as hell. Obviously the method of attack is biological and requires nothing what so ever from any defensive networks. Just a bio printer and a few or more willing actors
He's been bought by the matrix. Of course media loves to show him. He's black and supports the vaccine AND says woke shit about gender. Yes he's highly intelligent and a real scientist so that makes him very reputable but is still a sellout
You say man and woman but what you really mean is the difference between the male and female sex. Some people might think that sex is determined by the presence or absence of a Y chromosome, but this is not always the case. There are some people who have a Y chromosome but do not develop male characteristics, and some who do not have a Y chromosome but do develop male characteristics1. These are examples of intersex conditions, or differences or disorders of sex development (DSDs), which affect about 1 in 100 people1. Some people might think that sex is determined by the appearance of the genitals, but this is also not always the case. There are some people who have ambiguous or atypical genitalia, or who have genitalia that do not match their chromosomes or hormones2. These are also examples of intersex conditions, which can have various causes and effects on a person’s health and identity2. Some people might think that sex is determined by the genes that regulate sexual development, but this is also not always the case. There are many genes involved in the process of sex determination, and some of them can have variations that result in different outcomes1. For example, some people have a condition called androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), which means that their cells do not respond to male hormones, even though they have a Y chromosome1. These people may have female external genitalia, but no uterus or ovaries1. Some people might think that sex is determined by the cells that make up the body, but this is also not always the case. There are some people who are chimeras, which means that they have cells from two different individuals, usually from twin embryos that fused in the womb2. These people may have cells with different sex chromosomes or different gene variants in different parts of their body2. As you can see, sex is not a binary concept, but a spectrum that can be influenced by many factors. There is no definitive answer to how many human sexes there are, but there are many ways to describe and understand the diversity of human sex.
No credibility was lost, he acknowledges a psychological condition, and since he isn't a dogmatic religious type he just doesn't really care about the issue. It's only an issue to people who enjoy treating people differently based on what "type" of human they are, instead of just treating everyone as humans.
When you see earth from space you get this thing called the overview effect that changes your prospective on life when u realise we are all part of this delicate world with a thin atmospheric i think every human needs to experience this to make the world a better place
I like what he says, and then he contradicts himself when asked if a man can become a woman, he stops being a scientist and becomes a woke philosopher.
He explained it somewhere. He's just trying to be nice. Like with many thjngs he doesn't think deeply about the issue,. The problem is that he sounds like he thinks deeply about things, so when he says these things he's likely to influence a lot of people. The things that he can talk in depth about he's figured all out before.
He also uses bad faith arguments.. He loves to say "why do you care?" like this is some gotcha and there is some problem with you. Most arguments for "progressive" issues try to avoid discussion of the truth or the subject at all and just shutdown the other side whenever the other side says something that doesn't gel with their ideology.
Being woke is to push against freedom while changing the language we use to describe it. Segregation is safe spaces. Censorship is halting misinformation.
Neil made me realize something when he was talking about the astronauts quote, that makes feel a little pessimistic, it looks like that we have to wait until Aliens show up in order to put aside all our differences because something like that would give us a cosmic perspective and we will see ourselves as only one entity and not as a bunch of groups.
I had such a crush on Neil when I was a kid. I still have a few of his books. Enjoyed all of them. I see artificial intelligence, and social media, as progressive destroyers of mankind. Nevertheless, much respect for Mr. Neil DeGrasse Tyson. Thanks for having him on, Piers. You’re a phenomenal interviewer.
Artificial intelligence and social media are comparable to the printing press. If artificial intelligence and social media can destroy the world so can the printing press. World war one and two happened without social media and artificial intelligence. Your statement is meaningless.
Most of you just want someone to agree with you. As soon as they don’t they are “stupid” or “should stay in their lane” but when Elon musk offers a halfwitted opinion that leans to the right, “HE’S A GENIUS”
NGT is a legend in his own lunch time. He's an entertainer, not a serious scientist. We know little about the universe but he makes out there's not much left to know. Tosser !
In regards to the AI part I think the whole thing can be boiled down to the fact that he's a scientist so he's much more "curious" about the future of AI than scared because current AI can help humanity make great advancements. Which I do respect honestly, we need AI to get to the next step of our civilization. Not only that next step is unavoidable but it is also necessary to the dilemmas our species created for itself. And if the answer of the AI is "kill them all" so be it. Although I doubt it'll be its answer, I would lean much more toward artificial evolution to eliminate our weaknesses than the extermination of the rarest occurence in the universe.
Neil did not understand the question about AI no matter how many times Piers explained it to him although I’m still listening. He’s stuck on the thought that AI can’t deal with information that humans know but have not given to AI. Yes right now AI can’t travel to the beach to see a new beach shell. AI will have access to Google Earth, video, the internet etc. In the future AI will have instantaneous access to everything.
With all the respect, the question itself is nonesense. AI can have access to all the information in the world, it still does not have the ability to interact with the world in ways it is not programmed to do. No matter what you do, AI is a computer program that answers queries and question translating them into some mathematical commutation and solving them. It can then return an answer in a way that you programmed it to do. So the question of self-consciousness or self-engineering is a hallucination. Steven Hawkins was brilliant but he didn't know much about computers and didn't need to. A good point they made was that AI can be created by humans purposely for malicious reasons, that is indeed an issue and we already seeing it being used on propoganda bots, deep fakes etc.
Even now AI does more than you say it does. In future it will be able to self update, self improve, make discoveries and more and even have a physical presence. It can have no precise location sort of like be present in the cloud and order robots and other entities to move around, interact and do what it orders. You make it sound like a mere calculator or a device that can only do what humans program it to do. The future will be far different. @@alexmost166
@@alexmost166 It’s not nonsense. Humans are not as special as we would like to think. We are also programmed to receive information through our senses such as eyes ears senses and react to it. We are changed and improved through evolution and by our programming. AI will change and improve enormously eventually by itself and much faster. It may evolve and replace us.
@@crow1989 A scientist should know better than to say stupid shit like that. It shows that he has been compromised by the left, and that everything that comes out of his mouth now is entirely suspect.
Why is Neil being hit on so much here. He’s a good guy and everything he’s said is not incorrect. I’ve listened to 70% of this so far but unless there is a zinger at the end of this then don’t get the hate
Regarding AI learning beyond the internet... right now, the public interfaces for AI are _reactive_ in the sense that they only activate as a reaction to human input. You type a prompt, and AI responds. But once we allow AI to be PROactive, and then place that proactive AI into a shell (robot or vehicle or whatever) that has sensors for observing its surroundings, that's when I think we'll be straddling that point of no return.
@@ألحان-ح5ط (I'm responding to the Google Translation of your post: "This is not possible at all... Machines do not have a soul and will never have it... I can liken all human inventions (to an image) of God’s creation and they cannot reach their reality... The image does not equal the reality!!!!!") I didn't say anything about machines having a soul. I fully agree that they don't, and I don't believe they ever will or can have one. What I said was that once an AI algorithm is allowed to _initiate_ its actions, and allowed to receive and parse data about its surrounding environment from sensors it has access to, then that will be a point of no return.
Yes, the scary part is unlike us Ai will have telescopic, microscopic full electromagnetic spectrum vision. NDT has limited expertise when it comes to Ai.
Humans have always been the issue not the tool. "Guns don't kill people, the person behind the trigger does" When camping, most campers will tell you it's not the bears you need to be fearful of, it's other human beings...desperation is a vial disease all humans possess.
Oh come on. Neil believes in aliens since he’s been writing his first books. He just doesn’t believe those UFOs spotted on earth are of alien origins or those charlatans showing “alien” bodies. He believes, in fact he’s convinced, there are alien lives in other parts of the universe, but the probability that they are now visiting us is extremely low.
I love Neil's opinions and contributions in the most respectful way that I think anyone can for a public figure in Western society today. It feels like, even when I feel he's being disingenuous---purposefully at times---that I know he's still on the team. One minute, I'm frustrated when he downplays the dangers of AI, or starts to espouse convoluted nonsense about identity politics and wokeism, wanting to get some actual clear binary answers out of him. Within the next minute though, he starts laughing, or says something I could never expect, and I remember how much I can't help but love him... and, moreover, how thankful I am that inquisitive, open-minded people like him exist in such an ugly world. Piers is one of the good ones too. We need as many of these two kinds of human beings as we can get right now.
I'm watching your video... and I hear the questions and I see how you answer his questions... well not all of them. But, I have a question for you: could we have life on Earth without the Sun light? Thanks! In case you answer it. Otherwise, thank you for reading.😁
So every “activist” should be silenced and not be able to share their views. For someone watching a show called “uncensored” you really do like taking away someone’s freedom of speech
Finally a Chill Conversation with Piers Morgan
C 16:55
Piers Morgan doesn't need to shout down the guest when he starts saying something unacceptable to the narrative.
It is not chill conversation. They dont fight but the subject is not chill.
One of Neil's best. His observations about the societal cost of our poor understanding of probability and statistics. Also, how we may or may not be wise enough to ask the right questions to sustain ourselves.
We need more interviews like this in the world. Learning, laughing- it's awesome.
"Learning"... 🤣 🤣 🤣
It's fun, I wish he was my teacher back in my school days
me too friend.@@delharry4392
Piers Morgan never passes up an opportunity to boast about how he did the last TV interview with Steven Hawking lol
The funny thing is that Neil deGrasse Tyson is the one who actually had the last interview with Stephen Hawking
lol 😂
Typical narcissist...
Piers Morgan is a religious fanatical Catholic. He does not respect science at all.
If a huge asteroid was headed to Earth, he'd be praying, whilst Nel would solve the issue.
To be fair, Stephen Hawking's totally relevant to the conversation.
The Name of the person you couldn't remember Sir Tyson is Archidamus III, king of Sparta and it is said when he first saw a projectile hurled by a Balista, he cried out in anguish: oh Hercules, "the Valor of men is lost." and you sir mention this in Episode 10 of the great documentary series: Cosmos, Possible Worlds. I've left this comment as if you sir are going to see it or have the time to read comments!😅
Hey, thanks!
@@Adoubless Glad to be of help
Your comment helped me 8 months later too lol. @@pouyabryant
Brilliant, piers is so much better when he is actually interested in answers and not just creating headlines
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
00:00 Neil *deGrasse Tyson discusses his book "Starry Messenger" which emphasizes viewing things from a cosmic perspective, referencing the impact of seeing Earth from the moon.*
01:08 Tyson *highlights how the cosmic perspective can diminish tribalism, emphasizing humanity's shared existence on Earth.*
04:20 Reflecting *on Stephen Hawking's concerns, Tyson discusses the potential risks of advanced artificial intelligence, emphasizing the need for human oversight in critical decisions.*
08:18 Tyson *discusses the limitations of current AI capabilities, expressing skepticism about AI achieving genuine sentience or inventing new knowledge.*
11:18 Tyson *debates the possibility of AI reaching a point where it can think for itself and make autonomous decisions, expressing doubt about the near-term likelihood.*
15:25 Tyson *discusses the erosion of trust in science due to misinformation and the need for improved public understanding of scientific methods and statistics.*
19:55 Tyson *reflects on the unanswered questions of the universe, emphasizing a shift in focus from specific questions to humanity's capacity to answer them collectively.*
20:37 Tyson *discusses humanity's ability to ask the right questions and Elon Musk's views on colonizing other planets.*
21:03 Tyson *shares projections about Earth's population leveling off around 10 billion and discusses Mars as a potential terraforming candidate.*
22:21 Tyson *explains the purpose of colonizing Mars as a backup plan, emphasizing the importance of deflecting asteroids over planetary colonization.*
24:12 Tyson *reflects on humanity's wisdom in managing technological advancements and the need for a cosmic perspective to guide decision-making.*
25:21 Piers *Morgan admires Tyson's tie, leading to a playful exchange about planetary classification and AI's potential benefits despite concerns.*
Made with HARPA AI
I need a summarized navigation to this navigation 😂
So what would Hitler do with AI? What would Hitler do with atomic bomb? So who is scary the creation or the creator and which should you worry about more? So AI may be powerful like you are showing but what if biological life was wiped out tomorrow how would AI take over since they couldn't power up without humans today? So if AI doesn't have consciousness now then does it only activate when commanded for example that summary did you have to tell it what to summarize or did it just pop up as you were watching? So AI would be better soldier then humans because it doesn't process until its asked a specific question and then to carry out a specific job it would need clear instructions which like the automated answering system gives you a "is this correct" so a human would have to ok any action so AI is not the threat but how humans use AI!!
Love science and this gentleman is fun to listen to.👍
even piers thinks so too!😂
I loved this interview, but I'm saddened to read the comments. I don't think we should be casting aside such a brilliant man & mind over a few flaud, yet perfectly human comments, that Neil has made along the way. Over all he's obviously a great man & we definitely need more of those in this era!
A scientist who puts wokeism above science is completely and utterly worthless.
I don't dislike him for his views on gender or whatever. As an engineer in aerospace, I dislike him because he is condescending, speaks with authority on things outside of his sphere of knowledge, and has been incredibly wrong on several topics. It's hard to take him seriously.
@@Welcome2TheInternet Fair point. I was generalising re the comments made about Neil's political statements, for which I disagree with him on many, btw.
He is so up his own backside, that's the problem for me
yep
John Lennon - "Imagine" . Perfect summation of this interview...
Neil's the type of guy to wake his kids up to tell them he's going to bed
😂
🤣👍
😂c'mon
😂😂😂
Trolls don't even try to make sense any more ...
Every time I listen to Neil Tyson, I stop hating the world!!😎
25:55 THAT slip of the tongue is scaaary
Yikes
He's not wrong, but that's not what he would use it for.
Absolutely someone with the intent could design a highly lethal biological weapon in the form of a new disease
I think he meant to say help us develop new drugs for new diseases*
Yeah that’s crazy.
@@DanteKSA Yes, I thought that was obvious and never thought to craft anything else from it.
I totally want to send Tyson a Pluto pin for that tie.
Probably the most enlightening segment I’ve heard Neil do, and the most reassuring.
Such a great interview
Really enjoyed this, nice one talk TV
This man lost all credibility along time ago for someone who thinks hes so smart to say woman and men should be allowed to compete against eachother in sport was crazy
He's no biologist, apparently.
He’s has no common sense
@@jonahansen I'm no lawyer but I know murder is wrong
Meanwhile of the educated world knew exactly what he meant. Plus there Already several sports in which men and women can compete directly against each other.
@@McKluskie context : It was physical sport.
So now Einstein what did he mean?
And a side note name me a physical sport ANY physical sport the woman's world record is superior to the men's world record? Il wait.
i had 6 grams of mushrooms last night, woke up with a masters in Astrophysics .
And a sore bunghole? 😂😂
Impressive!
Tremendous
I figured out quantum physics after a really huge joint just after the Boxing Day tsunami.
Quick take out some patents and go on Joe Rogan!
Yes, Neil is an astrophysicist BUT I liked him better when he stuck to that, when he starts getting into politics and the woke stuff he loses me.
It just boils down to AI being in control of deadly things lol. AI gathering info on a device can't shoot or poison anything but a person's mind. I suppose if it made people eliminate themselves, only the weak minded would be removed?
He's no biologist, apparently.
He has become a walking joke.
It's amazing that people who think they are so smart are dumb as a rock! Neil is one of them.
@@Readabookfoofoo that's exactly what people wish I was & I pretend to be most of the time. It's not really worth it though. & Neither is anybody else. Hopefully they give me money to save lives, we will see.
But does he condemn Hamas?
To be fair it is a moral quandry...
@russelloverend1731 how?
Lmao. I’d love to know how many times he’s said “do you condemn hamas”
Good one lol
Likud party funded them though
Mr Tyson, You makes so much sense, you explain things so well..
ask him why the lab leak was called a deluded theory yet they knew all along it was the most likely
3:44 he's looking for the word 'primitive' and I'm praying he finds it lol
thats too offensive to say... hes gone to the woke side now
@@tuluksvui747shit up brain-dead moron.
@@tuluksvui747 Bot brains are now discrediting EVERYBODY and everything they disagree with, with the hijacked definition of "WOKE". 🤡
Neil's so profound... my oh my... so profound... If you don't believe me, ask Neil.
😂
Lol he should go to the lab. Not back to, but finally go to.
@@Squishymarshmellow80082 😂
THATS IT. HE SELLS HIS PROFOUNDNESS BUT HES MOT PROFOUND.
...NOT PROFOUND...
It is beautiful to think globally instead of individual
Could listen to Neil all day. An international treasure.
The joy of knowledge
Damn that conversation was chill personified. Almost weird how pleasant it was.
Neil de Grasse is a great and thinking scientist. I'm a fan, Mr Tyson!
Every Neil deGrasse Tyson interviews are amazing to watch. I never get tired of hearing him talk. Brilliant mind.
I love him. I also something hate him.
Great talk on both their parts
God , I love neil. To be both smart, wise, and hilarious is rare. What a guy
Neil left home at 18 and told his father "youre the man of the house now "
😂
They have great chemistry for two people who have very different opposing views
I attribute that to Neil. Also, piers must have had a good nights rest. Only one glaring time where he interrupted.
Tyson is very amiable and hard to get pissy with him like peirs usually does.
Great interview! Thank you.
Neil has this ability to present empty calorie point like it's a genius idea.
Lol
And people on the internet continue to think they know more than people who are actually educated.
boycott everything israel forever easy
@@GCohen9782 Facts
@@GCohen9782 You being a good example of that point. You don't think that AI would _ever_ learn how to forge a human signature in order to execute a kill shot?
Also, Snake in DeGrasse Tyson _admits_ that he does not understand human consciousness, right? What if AI comes to an understanding of consciousness _before_ humans do?
Fellating you heroes doesn't get you anything more than a mess on your face.
This was a great interview and for once Morgan asked the right questions.
Has he figured out what a female dinosaur is?
Never mind that, does he know about the Jurassic creature who lived constantly with piles! AKA The Mega-saur-ass!
A trans dinosaur is a her-before! 😀
Just what say, "if there were men from Mars and they came here, they wouldn't want to land here, they kill each other etc" Crazy, there is help on the horizon!!
@livingart2576 ngl that was funny!
Oh excellent 😅 👍
24:48 That's all we need to be better at everything, to know when we say or do wrong and correct it immediately
Star talk is great, but I love these real talk moments with Dr. Tyson ❤
0:00
"Well, I'm delun zem joy now by Neil."
-Pierce Morgan
No one has ever said it better.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I can't unhear it now 💀
Nice interview, i love it, thanks Piercd
The idea of valuing similarities and allowing for differences is a good one that provides an antithesis to the currently enforced ideology which acts out the opposite. It's a revolutionary idea in some sense, although it was the old status que which had a more universal social cohesion.
Neil is the only person in the universe that Piers cannot interrupt
Terminator may be the most important movie ever made.
lol I just wrote the same thing. Skynet doesnt seem like a movie anymore lol
Hardly its stupid as hell. Obviously the method of attack is biological and requires nothing what so ever from any defensive networks. Just a bio printer and a few or more willing actors
Because it paved the way for the greater movie Terminator 2. Good call.
9:45 “I didn’t name anyone for obvious reasons. However that person happens to be the director of a very famous movie franchise named Star Wars” 😂
15:30 Neil: "What is true and what is not."
Also Neil: "Men can be Women."
it's 26 minutes interview and half of it about Peirs Morgan's eldest son.
Tell me you don't understand the scientific view on the transgender topic without telling me you don't understand the scientific view.
“In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual” is a quote by Galileo Galilei,
This man lost all credibility not knowing the difference between a man and a woman
He's been bought by the matrix. Of course media loves to show him. He's black and supports the vaccine AND says woke shit about gender. Yes he's highly intelligent and a real scientist so that makes him very reputable but is still a sellout
You say man and woman but what you really mean is the difference between the male and female sex. Some people might think that sex is determined by the presence or absence of a Y chromosome, but this is not always the case. There are some people who have a Y chromosome but do not develop male characteristics, and some who do not have a Y chromosome but do develop male characteristics1. These are examples of intersex conditions, or differences or disorders of sex development (DSDs), which affect about 1 in 100 people1.
Some people might think that sex is determined by the appearance of the genitals, but this is also not always the case. There are some people who have ambiguous or atypical genitalia, or who have genitalia that do not match their chromosomes or hormones2. These are also examples of intersex conditions, which can have various causes and effects on a person’s health and identity2.
Some people might think that sex is determined by the genes that regulate sexual development, but this is also not always the case. There are many genes involved in the process of sex determination, and some of them can have variations that result in different outcomes1. For example, some people have a condition called androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), which means that their cells do not respond to male hormones, even though they have a Y chromosome1. These people may have female external genitalia, but no uterus or ovaries1.
Some people might think that sex is determined by the cells that make up the body, but this is also not always the case. There are some people who are chimeras, which means that they have cells from two different individuals, usually from twin embryos that fused in the womb2. These people may have cells with different sex chromosomes or different gene variants in different parts of their body2.
As you can see, sex is not a binary concept, but a spectrum that can be influenced by many factors. There is no definitive answer to how many human sexes there are, but there are many ways to describe and understand the diversity of human sex.
I love how all of the TROLLS are so triggered by Neil's staggering intellect while they have the IQ of a dishcloth
No credibility was lost, he acknowledges a psychological condition, and since he isn't a dogmatic religious type he just doesn't really care about the issue. It's only an issue to people who enjoy treating people differently based on what "type" of human they are, instead of just treating everyone as humans.
@@McKluskieand you my friend is exactly what’s wrong with the west
Make more interviews I like your chats. Two intelligent men🙂
I think that Neil needs to get some very big recognition while we still have him. Make Science Great Again 😎
When you see earth from space you get this thing called the overview effect that changes your prospective on life when u realise we are all part of this delicate world with a thin atmospheric i think every human needs to experience this to make the world a better place
Highly recommend his newest book. Really does a fantastic job in framing things in a new and progressive way. 10/10
He’s so effn clever and has this power to explain things marvellous
You’re just stupid.
Neil hasn’t said anything new or profound.. just likes the sound of his own voice
Neil is the perfect example of book smart not actually smart.
笑
I’m sure he’s extremely concerned with your judgment of his intelligence. lol.
Context? Because this one comment makes you look like the one uneducated
Either way he's still far more intelligent than you & yours
ah yes davidmcadoo
Love that interview
I like what he says, and then he contradicts himself when asked if a man can become a woman, he stops being a scientist and becomes a woke philosopher.
He explained it somewhere. He's just trying to be nice. Like with many thjngs he doesn't think deeply about the issue,. The problem is that he sounds like he thinks deeply about things, so when he says these things he's likely to influence a lot of people. The things that he can talk in depth about he's figured all out before.
He also uses bad faith arguments.. He loves to say "why do you care?" like this is some gotcha and there is some problem with you. Most arguments for "progressive" issues try to avoid discussion of the truth or the subject at all and just shutdown the other side whenever the other side says something that doesn't gel with their ideology.
Crazy how you take away all the context and act like you know everything just for a few likes on a TH-cam post
As I see you are using it, could you please define what "woke" means?
Being woke is to push against freedom while changing the language we use to describe it. Segregation is safe spaces. Censorship is halting misinformation.
Brilliant Conversation.
The fact that he can casually say "15 of my books" and it's not an exaggeration is hilarious to me!
He's the only one who has read them
何？Great
I'm betting he had a ghostwriter
😄@@michaelc3977
@@michaelc3977most of them are bestsellers, and I have read two of them and I am in France.
This is the greatest thing I've ever watched.
Neil's the type to talk about soup while eating cottage pie.
Great interview Piers, well done. NDT is sooo good
Two great man in their profession
lol that's a good one man. hahaha
Two hacks.
Love his realistic yet human view on life.
24:00 The crew laughing 😆😆
Thanks for teaching us about space and physics in a fantastic way for the curious layman.
Very entertaining conversation here, thanks for the content
Neil made me realize something when he was talking about the astronauts quote, that makes feel a little pessimistic, it looks like that we have to wait until Aliens show up in order to put aside all our differences because something like that would give us a cosmic perspective and we will see ourselves as only one entity and not as a bunch of groups.
I had such a crush on Neil when I was a kid. I still have a few of his books. Enjoyed all of them. I see artificial intelligence, and social media, as progressive destroyers of mankind. Nevertheless, much respect for Mr. Neil DeGrasse Tyson. Thanks for having him on, Piers. You’re a phenomenal interviewer.
😂😂😂
You’re so lost.
Artificial intelligence and social media are comparable to the printing press. If artificial intelligence and social media can destroy the world so can the printing press. World war one and two happened without social media and artificial intelligence. Your statement is meaningless.
Why? Man is a activist
@@knockout4121 an
Most of you just want someone to agree with you. As soon as they don’t they are “stupid” or “should stay in their lane” but when Elon musk offers a halfwitted opinion that leans to the right, “HE’S A GENIUS”
maybe?
Outstanding interview.
NGT is a legend in his own lunch time. He's an entertainer, not a serious scientist. We know little about the universe but he makes out there's not much left to know. Tosser !
In regards to the AI part I think the whole thing can be boiled down to the fact that he's a scientist so he's much more "curious" about the future of AI than scared because current AI can help humanity make great advancements.
Which I do respect honestly, we need AI to get to the next step of our civilization. Not only that next step is unavoidable but it is also necessary to the dilemmas our species created for itself. And if the answer of the AI is "kill them all" so be it. Although I doubt it'll be its answer, I would lean much more toward artificial evolution to eliminate our weaknesses than the extermination of the rarest occurence in the universe.
This is not a scientist, this is an activist.
You're qualified to make that assessment? Laff. I will keep listening to Neil!
He is an astrophysicist
@ShawnDrymen lmao yeah bro I'm afraid of vaccines too
Dont become one, put politics aside and just enjoy what they have to offer.
@ShawnDrymen Had six and no covid-19 or problems.
I love Neil so much. No ifs and buts. Just science.
Neil did not understand the question about AI no matter how many times Piers explained it to him although I’m still listening.
He’s stuck on the thought that AI can’t deal with information that humans know but have not given to AI. Yes right now AI can’t travel to the beach to see a new beach shell. AI will have access to Google Earth, video, the internet etc. In the future AI will have instantaneous access to everything.
With all the respect, the question itself is nonesense. AI can have access to all the information in the world, it still does not have the ability to interact with the world in ways it is not programmed to do. No matter what you do, AI is a computer program that answers queries and question translating them into some mathematical commutation and solving them. It can then return an answer in a way that you programmed it to do. So the question of self-consciousness or self-engineering is a hallucination. Steven Hawkins was brilliant but he didn't know much about computers and didn't need to.
A good point they made was that AI can be created by humans purposely for malicious reasons, that is indeed an issue and we already seeing it being used on propoganda bots, deep fakes etc.
Even now AI does more than you say it does. In future it will be able to self update, self improve, make discoveries and more and even have a physical presence. It can have no precise location sort of like be present in the cloud and order robots and other entities to move around, interact and do what it orders. You make it sound like a mere calculator or a device that can only do what humans program it to do. The future will be far different. @@alexmost166
@@alexmost166what was it with that google AI engineer who was fired for claiming the the program he was working on became sentient?
@@georgemala4046 just wanted attention
@@alexmost166 It’s not nonsense. Humans are not as special as we would like to think. We are also programmed to receive information through our senses such as eyes ears senses and react to it. We are changed and improved through evolution and by our programming. AI will change and improve enormously eventually by itself and much faster. It may evolve and replace us.
Love NDT, made watching Piers Morgan tolerable for 20minutes , that is an achievement!
My favorite astrophysicist in every universe 🤍✨
Except when he is shilling for gender ideology, and saying that men should compete against women in sports.
That's not astrophysics that's just his opinion so it makes no difference to when he talks about science.
@@crow1989 A scientist should know better than to say stupid shit like that. It shows that he has been compromised by the left, and that everything that comes out of his mouth now is entirely suspect.
@@jimherold7827 since when did neil get canceled? wtf did i miss
@jimherold7827 Yeah, because unlike you he has an IQ above 85 and actually understands the subject beyond moral panic nazi fear mongering
Why is Neil being hit on so much here. He’s a good guy and everything he’s said is not incorrect.
I’ve listened to 70% of this so far but unless there is a zinger at the end of this then don’t get the hate
Lost respect for Degrasse Tyson. The last person I would expect being «woke» and even qestioning genders. A SCIENTIST😖
Claims to be against identity politics, doesn't critisize a single person on the left.
Never had any for him - he was selected by the jew Carl Sagan as a box ticking exercise and an act of progressive cultural subversion.
The jew, lol.@@johngammon963
The jew, lol.@@johngammon963
@@Based_Stuhlingeryou don't have to criticise something just because you don't agree with it. Some people like to have their peace.
Neil is just a pleasure to listen to, whatever the topic.
Regarding AI learning beyond the internet... right now, the public interfaces for AI are _reactive_ in the sense that they only activate as a reaction to human input. You type a prompt, and AI responds. But once we allow AI to be PROactive, and then place that proactive AI into a shell (robot or vehicle or whatever) that has sensors for observing its surroundings, that's when I think we'll be straddling that point of no return.
@@ألحان-ح5ط (I'm responding to the Google Translation of your post: "This is not possible at all... Machines do not have a soul and will never have it... I can liken all human inventions (to an image) of God’s creation and they cannot reach their reality... The image does not equal the reality!!!!!")
I didn't say anything about machines having a soul. I fully agree that they don't, and I don't believe they ever will or can have one. What I said was that once an AI algorithm is allowed to _initiate_ its actions, and allowed to receive and parse data about its surrounding environment from sensors it has access to, then that will be a point of no return.
Yes, the scary part is unlike us Ai will have telescopic, microscopic full electromagnetic spectrum vision. NDT has limited expertise when it comes to Ai.
"All I ask of living is to have no chains on me, and all I ask of dying is to go naturally."
I’m just going listen to Carl Sagan from now on because a woke mind is completely destroyed absolutely 💯
You'd rather someone asleep?
I think Sagan was quite liberal too.
There’s liberal and then there’s woke liberal.
@@cherylM.905 Well... one inevitably leads to the other.
@@cherylM.905Nah you’re just too thick
My Fav Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson
At this stage we should be more concerned about other humans than AI.
Bravo sir 🫡
Humans have always been the issue not the tool.
"Guns don't kill people, the person behind the trigger does"
When camping, most campers will tell you it's not the bears you need to be fearful of, it's other human beings...desperation is a vial disease all humans possess.
Wrong
Completely agree
I don't agree with everything Neil says but as an inspiration for children to get into Science (especially American children)... he is THE man.
This man doesn’t believe in aliens . He’s done
I love and respect Neil, but he's in denial.
He is smart enough to put feelings aside and make an educated guess. I don't believe in ET anymore than I believe in a GOD.
Exactly
He has said in prior interviews that he does believe there is life in the universe.
Oh come on. Neil believes in aliens since he’s been writing his first books. He just doesn’t believe those UFOs spotted on earth are of alien origins or those charlatans showing “alien” bodies. He believes, in fact he’s convinced, there are alien lives in other parts of the universe, but the probability that they are now visiting us is extremely low.
I can listen to Neil all day. Would love to sit down with him
Neil is an absolute moran. I used to respect him until he tried to explain gender as non binary to bill maher. Most cringe thing I ever watched
I love Neil's opinions and contributions in the most respectful way that I think anyone can for a public figure in Western society today. It feels like, even when I feel he's being disingenuous---purposefully at times---that I know he's still on the team. One minute, I'm frustrated when he downplays the dangers of AI, or starts to espouse convoluted nonsense about identity politics and wokeism, wanting to get some actual clear binary answers out of him. Within the next minute though, he starts laughing, or says something I could never expect, and I remember how much I can't help but love him... and, moreover, how thankful I am that inquisitive, open-minded people like him exist in such an ugly world. Piers is one of the good ones too. We need as many of these two kinds of human beings as we can get right now.
You two would be a great podcast or mainstream show
I'm watching your video... and I hear the questions and I see how you answer his questions... well not all of them. But, I have a question for you: could we have life on Earth without the Sun light? Thanks! In case you answer it. Otherwise, thank you for reading.😁
"politics looks so pathetic" hit too hard...
Edit: Neil's tie is dope...
@ 14:00 greatest quote I've heard in a while
Brilliant interview!
lol
❤❤❤❤❤ thank you both
It's good that people acknowledge that this guy isn't a scientist 👍
These people are idiots. He's a scientist.
What is your definition of a scientist?
ty
No serious platform should treat this guy as a legitimate science expert. He’s an activist, plain and simple.
So every “activist” should be silenced and not be able to share their views. For someone watching a show called “uncensored” you really do like taking away someone’s freedom of speech