0:16: 🌍 Plate tectonics play a crucial role in a planet's climate, weather, and geology, and are important for the long-term survival of life. 4:45: 🌍 The search for extraterrestrial moving plates could help point us in the right direction in finding life outside of Earth. 9:44: 🌍 Scientists have discovered surprising insights about the interior of Mars, including the thickness and density of its crust, the depth and convective properties of its mantle, and the composition of its core. 14:20: 🌋 Evidence of movement and seismic activity on Mars suggests the occurrence of recent MarsQuake on Elysium Mons volcano. 19:13: 🌟 Studying starquakes can provide insights into the internal workings of celestial objects, but many mysteries remain. 23:31: 🌋 Io and Venus have volcanic activity and mysterious features that scientists are still trying to understand. 28:19: 🪐 The surface of Venus is unique with slow erosion, extensive volcanic features, and a relatively young age. Recap by Tammy AI
I realize this problem may be inherent in any compilation where the segments are arranged thematically instead of chronologically. Still, I found it confusing when, around 8:50, Hank told me about the Insight Lander's seismometer, and 5 minutes later, at 13:50, Reid told me that the Viking Landers had the only seismometers on Mars. I think the latter segment was included for its information on moonquakes and the editor overlooked that it had information on Marsquakes that the earlier segment made outdated. I don't think Hank's intro warned us about that or tried to explain it. The result is not optimal.
This was a great episode. It talked about stuff I have always wondered about, and some things I never considered. I happen to be very fond of neutron stars and that segment had me cheering for the anomalies in them that continue to make them mysterious. Some day we will build a spacecraft that can withstand Venus' hellish atmosphere and solve the questions it continues to present us with. Space is awesome, scary and fascinating so please keep posting on this channel to keep my brain rotating with new ideas.
You guys mentioned not having a lot of Mars quake data. The Mars InSight mission has returned a lot of data regarding quakes on Mars over the past four years.
Has there been any physics simulations that can calculate how long an impact may cause plate tectonics to shift? Thea collided with primordial earth and that will definitely shake up the crust formation of ANY planet.
19:30 I know what he means, but he said it wrong. The rotational axis always goes through the center of mass, if there isn't any outside force. What he means is they spin faster if the mass distribution gets denser.
I never actually thought about gravity waves in that light. If a stars mass is unchanged and the collapse or supernova is crushing and expelling the matter that was already present, why is it creating gravitational ripples? Just a question to no one in particular.
Concentration and proximity, gravity decreases with distance, so the density of that matter and where it is matters for how the matter effects the space around it.
(I am pulling that directly from my behind, to be clear. But hey, if I'm wrong, that's excellent bait to attract people who just can't help but correct others on the internet. Just as planned... heheheheheh)
Don’t they mean the gravitational influences from the *Sun* cause seismic activity on the moon? Since the moon is tidal locked and it’s orbit is near circular, Shouldn’t the the gravitational force stay pretty much the same?
The moon's orbit isn't perfectly circular, so any deviation from a circular path will cause some tidal effect. I'm with you though in saying that it's not just the Earth, it's gotta be both the Earth and the Sun. I would even venture a guess that the Sun has the larger overall effect considering the fact that, as the Moon orbits the Earth, it gets continually closer to and further away from the Sun by hundreds of thousands of kilometers each orbit.
As a child I always thought If I got a genie lamp I would wish for a planet the same size as earth and habitable to pop into existence opposite the sun to earth. And one orbiting 90°to us. So going over and under the sun. That way wr could have 4 earths.
1:36 So the earth has its own methods of regulating carbon? If this is true, then it directly contradicts the plethora of content on your channel regarding the earth's climate.
stable, in this particular context, means suitable for life, not necessarily for most of the specific living things that exist right now. earth's climate can change, but it won't become a burning hellscape (like venus) or something like that.
I mean im just spitballing here but i reckon that the cause of venus' "new surface" or whatever was prolly caused by the fact thats its a hot ass hellscape. No idea whatd have cause the whole ass planet to get so many greenhouse gasses outta nowhere but if you take a planet thats cool and heat it up like to say... the 900 degrees or whatever venus is, considering that venus is similar in size to our planet as well the deeper you go the hotter it gets. Heat up the surface to a temp that can damn near melt lead then the interior is bound to heat as well which, at least in my head, melts more rock making the crust thinner which in turn would allow for random ass vocanos to pop up all over the place which would only drive the heating more with pumping sulfer and all that other wonderful stuff into the atmosphere.
How do they know the planet like didn't have tectonic plates in the past. When it was more geologicly active. Maybe weigh of the oceans are a factor. Maybe even life it self
Plate tectonics involve lighter continental plates made of granite overriding heavier oceanic basalt plates. Granite can only be formed through plate tectonics involving water. If there is no granite, you know there were no plate tectonics as there are no plates.
TH-cam: creators may NOT post the same video more than once Lazy Sci show: what if we repost an old video again, but... Glued to another old video? TH-cam: wow that's lazy and terrible.. But, yeah, sure, I guess...
@@saurabhsrivastv No, stars are made of plasma, not planets. If a planet was hot enough to ionize matter it is either very nearly in a star or a star itself.
Pulsar... a dead star... It is simply something else. To say a star dies, there is nothing alive to die. It is morphic. It comes from, "a dying, dead campfire", be nice if we could lose the misnomer. I suppose a butterfly is a dead caterpillar. :p
If this link works it is a great solar quake image. apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/9806/sunquake_soho_big.jpg I got it from the NASA website searching "solar quakes" I love this video thank you.
Hunh... These theories aren't as shaky as I thought they'd be.
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Booooo lol
ba-dum chhhhh
🙄
I'm shaken to the core.
0:16: 🌍 Plate tectonics play a crucial role in a planet's climate, weather, and geology, and are important for the long-term survival of life.
4:45: 🌍 The search for extraterrestrial moving plates could help point us in the right direction in finding life outside of Earth.
9:44: 🌍 Scientists have discovered surprising insights about the interior of Mars, including the thickness and density of its crust, the depth and convective properties of its mantle, and the composition of its core.
14:20: 🌋 Evidence of movement and seismic activity on Mars suggests the occurrence of recent MarsQuake on Elysium Mons volcano.
19:13: 🌟 Studying starquakes can provide insights into the internal workings of celestial objects, but many mysteries remain.
23:31: 🌋 Io and Venus have volcanic activity and mysterious features that scientists are still trying to understand.
28:19: 🪐 The surface of Venus is unique with slow erosion, extensive volcanic features, and a relatively young age.
Recap by Tammy AI
What did the first tectonic plate say to the other tectonic plate?
"That last earthquake was not my fault."
I enjoyed this video a lot. Gave many answers to my thinking brain. Thanks sci show space
I realize this problem may be inherent in any compilation where the segments are arranged thematically instead of chronologically. Still, I found it confusing when, around 8:50, Hank told me about the Insight Lander's seismometer, and 5 minutes later, at 13:50, Reid told me that the Viking Landers had the only seismometers on Mars. I think the latter segment was included for its information on moonquakes and the editor overlooked that it had information on Marsquakes that the earlier segment made outdated. I don't think Hank's intro warned us about that or tried to explain it. The result is not optimal.
Were any engineers involved in setting this compilation up? If not, could explain the lack of optimization? 🤔
Ty love the the fun DFTBA!
This was a great episode. It talked about stuff I have always wondered about, and some things I never considered. I happen to be very fond of neutron stars and that segment had me cheering for the anomalies in them that continue to make them mysterious. Some day we will build a spacecraft that can withstand Venus' hellish atmosphere and solve the questions it continues to present us with. Space is awesome, scary and fascinating so please keep posting on this channel to keep my brain rotating with new ideas.
Quaking rocky bodies is a a great band name
"but it's a start!"
Actually made me lol
Flagging this video as needing (not just auto-generated) subtitles. Please help us hard of hearing and deaf folks access your content!! 🥰🤟🏻
Trip adviser say this is the best place to be in the whole vers.
...and in a hundred thousand years the alien will say, "I am not on Earth, nor in orbit". when finally, the sat signal arrives.
Also could you put a little more into making sure that Comp info isn't confusing or contradicting earlier info. There was confusing stuff on viking
maybe a quake like this caused the mystery energy blast this week
You guys mentioned not having a lot of Mars quake data. The Mars InSight mission has returned a lot of data regarding quakes on Mars over the past four years.
Has there been any physics simulations that can calculate how long an impact may cause plate tectonics to shift? Thea collided with primordial earth and that will definitely shake up the crust formation of ANY planet.
"...must be jelly, cause jam don't shake like that!"
19:30 I know what he means, but he said it wrong. The rotational axis always goes through the center of mass, if there isn't any outside force. What he means is they spin faster if the mass distribution gets denser.
21:27 The Stars may have faults, but Pizza does not.
I never actually thought about gravity waves in that light. If a stars mass is unchanged and the collapse or supernova is crushing and expelling the matter that was already present, why is it creating gravitational ripples? Just a question to no one in particular.
Concentration and proximity, gravity decreases with distance, so the density of that matter and where it is matters for how the matter effects the space around it.
(I am pulling that directly from my behind, to be clear.
But hey, if I'm wrong, that's excellent bait to attract people who just can't help but correct others on the internet.
Just as planned... heheheheheh)
12:26 sorry was eating, and i thought 'Mooncakes' and 'Mars cakes' heh...
Aren’t the plates still under your feet if you’re in orbit?🤔…just WAY under.
Depends on your orientation, I guess.
Does Uranus have any eruptions
Don’t they mean the gravitational influences from the *Sun* cause seismic activity on the moon?
Since the moon is tidal locked and it’s orbit is near circular, Shouldn’t the the gravitational force stay pretty much the same?
The moon's orbit isn't perfectly circular, so any deviation from a circular path will cause some tidal effect. I'm with you though in saying that it's not just the Earth, it's gotta be both the Earth and the Sun. I would even venture a guess that the Sun has the larger overall effect considering the fact that, as the Moon orbits the Earth, it gets continually closer to and further away from the Sun by hundreds of thousands of kilometers each orbit.
As a child I always thought If I got a genie lamp I would wish for a planet the same size as earth and habitable to pop into existence opposite the sun to earth. And one orbiting 90°to us. So going over and under the sun. That way wr could have 4 earths.
Um, how much sulfur is on earth, that seems like a really important question now
It’s all fun and games until millions die in a plasmaquake.
Is Hank CGI in segment 4? Or is the lighting just weird?
“well, we have an answer” - TH-cam: Have some beer ads.
Spank the Hank~
1:36 So the earth has its own methods of regulating carbon? If this is true, then it directly contradicts the plethora of content on your channel regarding the earth's climate.
stable, in this particular context, means suitable for life, not necessarily for most of the specific living things that exist right now.
earth's climate can change, but it won't become a burning hellscape (like venus) or something like that.
Well technically tectonic plates are still shifting below your feet even if you are watching this in orbit. Unless you're orbiting Mars I guess.
Depends on your perspective of down at that point i reckon lol. But yeh you aint wrong
I thought this was about Stars 🤔
After using up their planets the Venus and Mars people fought a raging nuclear war against each other over Earth
Hank talks with his hands.
I’m watching this video upside down, now what?
Neil DeGrass Whiteson! It’s Neil DeGrass Whiteson!!!
Hank is aging! His voice is deeper now than it was a couple years ago.
I don't think I can put any of that in a terrarium,
Wait, there are chemical processes on the Earth’s surface that cool the Earth’s temperature?
Nobody thought that deserved further examination?
There has been a ton of research on it
It is a core part our understanding of paleoclimatology
@@KellyClowers Why don’t you think that was further explained in the video? That’s definitely not common knowledge to ppl outside of the field.
@@TheGbelcher Because this video isn’t about climate
I mean im just spitballing here but i reckon that the cause of venus' "new surface" or whatever was prolly caused by the fact thats its a hot ass hellscape. No idea whatd have cause the whole ass planet to get so many greenhouse gasses outta nowhere but if you take a planet thats cool and heat it up like to say... the 900 degrees or whatever venus is, considering that venus is similar in size to our planet as well the deeper you go the hotter it gets. Heat up the surface to a temp that can damn near melt lead then the interior is bound to heat as well which, at least in my head, melts more rock making the crust thinner which in turn would allow for random ass vocanos to pop up all over the place which would only drive the heating more with pumping sulfer and all that other wonderful stuff into the atmosphere.
Can a planets magnetic field go on and off
yes are moon was like that before it cooled off completely
A starquake nearly wiped out the cheela civilization.
My thought is that the inner core of a neutron star is a blobby quark star spinning slightly off kilter, because gravity. I could be wrong.
Oh wow this guy sounds just like neil degrasse tyson.
The funny part there is Greenwich toland it does not start there hahaha
How can you have so many subs but that few views?
Because this is just another compilation, and not new content.
How do they know the planet like didn't have tectonic plates in the past. When it was more geologicly active. Maybe weigh of the oceans are a factor. Maybe even life it self
Plate tectonics involve lighter continental plates made of granite overriding heavier oceanic basalt plates. Granite can only be formed through plate tectonics involving water. If there is no granite, you know there were no plate tectonics as there are no plates.
@@filonin2 I just looked up granite on Mars
Joke is on YOU! For I~ am doing a hand stand! muahahaha
I guess if the recycling gone it's not hot anymore?...
hannnnnnnnnnnnnnnk
TH-cam: creators may NOT post the same video more than once
Lazy Sci show: what if we repost an old video again, but... Glued to another old video?
TH-cam: wow that's lazy and terrible.. But, yeah, sure, I guess...
Uranus quakes
Click bait? The video were talking about plates on planets not stars..
maybe watch the whole video before commenting on the content of the video...
@@saurabhsrivastv No, stars are made of plasma, not planets. If a planet was hot enough to ionize matter it is either very nearly in a star or a star itself.
@@saurabhsrivastv plasma is a type of matter, btw.
SciShow is getting very sloppy. Compilation after compilaton. Not getting daily videos every day. Pull your socks up!
Yeah, I'm getting kind of tired of all the compilations. I have to stop and check the video description now to see if I even want to watch it.
We know nothing about exo tectonics
It’s ridiculous to suggest anything else Hank
Why are we making plasma when there are stars?!!
The other one is like an atom and blahsko is irregular to me
Magnets
Pulsar... a dead star... It is simply something else. To say a star dies, there is nothing alive to die. It is morphic. It comes from, "a dying, dead campfire", be nice if we could lose the misnomer. I suppose a butterfly is a dead caterpillar. :p
"atmosphaeram", not "atmospherum"
Earth is not special
I know now from vid con an element for' S
HHAHA BORATE
😵💫 what even ? The space I need is with a bf lol soo colld
I don't like these compilation videos. It's just a lazy way to post videos on your channel
Compilations are lazy
👎🏽👎🏽
If this link works it is a great solar quake image. apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/9806/sunquake_soho_big.jpg
I got it from the NASA website searching "solar quakes"
I love this video thank you.