I personally prefer the one on the right: The crushed ice cut is quite sparkly. I don't necessarily need to see the 'bowtie', as I am more concerned with sparkles. In addition, the oval seems a little more elongated in the second stone, which is more slenderising to one's fingers. Thanks for creating this lovely video Sir. Cheers, Alaskana
Hm.... so, which one WAS the natural Diamond? I must have missed it. I would tend to the one on the right side (watched from here). Why? because of the color and the way it sparkles. the one to the left had something 'watery' . I might be wrong. You tell me!
That's a great question. I believe they are both lab grown diamonds, but for reference, if one was an earth and one was a lab, there should be no way of separating the two from a visual perspective. In my opinion and although a funny analogy, lab grown diamonds are as real of a diamond as a test tube baby is a human (meaning they are made created differently, but even when splitting hairs, the visual outcome should be the exact same).
That's a good question. We made this video over 2 years ago and unfortunately, we didn't save the files on them. I would think they are pretty comparable though and both not far from the average LG Oval we see these days regarding cut quality & depth.
Interestingly enough, most lab grown diamonds do have (impurities/inclusions). To the best of my knowledge, I don't believe they have figured out a way to make them all flawless as of yet.
![[ ออกกอง ] วัยหนุ่ม 2544 โลกหลังลูกกรง..ทัวร์กองถ่ายหนังใน "คุกของจริง" | JUSTดูIT.](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vB--aOkZCpw/mqdefault.jpg)
I personally prefer the one on the right: The crushed ice cut is quite sparkly. I don't necessarily need to see the 'bowtie', as I am more concerned with sparkles. In addition, the oval seems a little more elongated in the second stone, which is more slenderising to one's fingers.
Thanks for creating this lovely video Sir.
Cheers, Alaskana
Thanks for your feedback Alaskana. Pretty name by the way!
Están bellisimos❤❤❤
Both fabulous
thank you for fixing the clip!
Your welcome. We're glad it we could be of assistance.
Hm.... so, which one WAS the natural Diamond? I must have missed it. I would tend to the one on the right side (watched from here). Why? because of the color and the way it sparkles. the one to the left had something 'watery' . I might be wrong. You tell me!
That's a great question. I believe they are both lab grown diamonds, but for reference, if one was an earth and one was a lab, there should be no way of separating the two from a visual perspective. In my opinion and although a funny analogy, lab grown diamonds are as real of a diamond as a test tube baby is a human (meaning they are made created differently, but even when splitting hairs, the visual outcome should be the exact same).
Price
Is the difference in cut? Depth%?
That's a good question. We made this video over 2 years ago and unfortunately, we didn't save the files on them. I would think they are pretty comparable though and both not far from the average LG Oval we see these days regarding cut quality & depth.
Oda neymiş mücevherin kiralini bende dir
The lab grown has no impurities in ‘em! I’ll take lab grown any day
Interestingly enough, most lab grown diamonds do have (impurities/inclusions). To the best of my knowledge, I don't believe they have figured out a way to make them all flawless as of yet.
НУ РАЗВЕ ЧТО НА ПУГОВИЦЫ СГОДЯТСЯ - если мужчины не продпочтут на запонки.
Depends on the quality of diamond seed. Most labs have inclusions or impurities.
Beauty full
Thanks. We appreciate your feedback!
Wow
Nice good
Thanks : )
สวัสดีจัะ
Камень господина Дьявола наверно
A Cagliari chi va molto dalla sua amica e chi è collegata tatti a lode visite