"We've WARNED The Government About This!" - Electric Cars Twice As Likely To Hit Pedestrians

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024
  • Talk's Alex Phillips is joined by Fair Fuel UK’s Howard Cox, who says electric cars won’t be popular and “are dangerous”.
    A recent study has discovered that pedestrians are at a higher risk of being struck by an electric or hybrid vehicle.
    The analysis of road traffic accidents revealed that these types of vehicles are more prone to being involved in collisions with individuals in urban areas.
    The study examined a vast amount of data, including 32 billion miles of travel by battery-powered cars and three trillion miles by petrol and diesel cars.
    Surprisingly, it was found that electric and hybrid vehicles are twice as likely to hit pedestrians when comparing the distance traveled.
    The reasons behind why these environmentally friendly cars are considered more dangerous remain unclear. However, experts suggest that there could be several factors contributing to this increased risk for drivers.
    Click here for more from Talk talk.tv
    If you need any help visit: talk.tv/helplines
    #electriccars #speed #petrol #cars

ความคิดเห็น • 585

  • @kennethmaley2443
    @kennethmaley2443 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    4 electric buses in London have caught fire you don't see this on the main media.

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Well the last bus that caught fire was diesel. That was about a week ago in Twickenham.
      Some stats for you:
      2006 - 15 bus fires all diesel
      2005 - 7 bus fires all diesel
      2004 -22 bus fires all diesel

    • @Burz69
      @Burz69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They are all diesel.
      I bet you feel like a right .....

    • @geoffersvoiceofreason2534
      @geoffersvoiceofreason2534 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      England and Wales stats for 2023/24. 242 bus fires, all ICE. You’re correct, we don’t see this in the main stream media!
      If you are referring to the Tottenham bus on fire some weeks ago. The MSM and anti EV clickbait grifters didn’t show the bit where it was towed away. Yet you all say if a battery EV battery catches fire it can’t be put out. Yet that bus was still mainly intact, suggesting it was not a battery fire.
      Statistically, EVs are over 20 times less likely to catch fire than ICE vehicles but that’s not what the MSM report. No, one EV goes up in flames and it is international news headlines.

    • @Burz69
      @Burz69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@geoffersvoiceofreason2534 60 times less likely. 100 times less likely than a hybrid.

    • @PedalPowerPanther
      @PedalPowerPanther 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      4 million combustion engine vehicles worldwide catch fire every year. 150 ev fires last year.

  • @coconutBarnes
    @coconutBarnes 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    NETZERO EMERGENCY? - where is the BAN ON PRIVATE JETS?

    • @stuarttaylor4990
      @stuarttaylor4990 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I wouldn't like to fly in an electric plane 😂

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Climate Change is the issue mate and I agree about private jets.
      EVs will help reduce total energy consumption in the UK.

    • @BobBuilder-mq9wr
      @BobBuilder-mq9wr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      The elete hipocits can't lose there perks

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@SteveGreenwood-gb7dc
      You don't understand energy engineering?

    • @paulnolan1352
      @paulnolan1352 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@Paul-yh8kmClimate change has been happening for about 4.5Billion years with or without us. The biggest threat is overpopulation.

  • @MisterstereoOso
    @MisterstereoOso 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    Plenty of pedestrians walk around listening to headphones so they can’t hear anyway..

  • @janolaful
    @janolaful 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Trying to make us all buy electric cars yet the priminister and his cronies drive petrol cars .

    • @marviwilson1853
      @marviwilson1853 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is an election coming up. You can use your vote to make a change.

    • @DavidPlayfair
      @DavidPlayfair 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's a priminister?

    • @TheJon2442
      @TheJon2442 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      could be the PM. However, if you are trying to be a complete ass. You are doing a splendid job!

    • @DavidPlayfair
      @DavidPlayfair 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheJon2442 I try to do my best! ;)

    • @janolaful
      @janolaful 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DavidPlayfair the head of our government

  • @susanhawley4102
    @susanhawley4102 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    It has been well known for at least 50 years, that silent vehicles are more likely to hit pedestrians. Why did it take new study to state the obvious?

    • @nigelparry4911
      @nigelparry4911 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they not silent !! my hybrid makes a space sounding noise to pedestrians and by law they have to emit a pedestrian aware sound

    • @andrewjenkinson7052
      @andrewjenkinson7052 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@nigelparry4911*a space sounding noise.* Wtf does SPACE sound like? Everything in space is SILENT.

  • @Peeug
    @Peeug 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Whatever happened to pedestrians using their eyes before they cross the road

    • @JosephWood1941-iz6mi
      @JosephWood1941-iz6mi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Most pedestrians use both eyes and ears when crossing the road. In general they're more cautious because of their vulnerability unlike motorists who can often get mentally wrapped inside their steel bubble and assume that there will be no obstacles in their path.

    • @Peeug
      @Peeug 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If they used their eyes as intended they would see the oncoming vehicle, and not walk out in front of it. STOP,LOOK, LISTEN, then cross if safe to do so.

    • @chunderground9880
      @chunderground9880 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So we have to breathe in toxic fumes so that people don’t have to look as they cross the road. How ridiculous is that…

    • @louisadigi8733
      @louisadigi8733 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Cars just come flying down the road from nowhere where I live and they are usually way over the speed limits, so when you can't hear them coming either crossing the road becomes very dangerous for pedestrians no matter how careful we are!

    • @SaxJockey
      @SaxJockey 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@louisadigi8733Also many EVs are capable of unnecessary fast acceleration, in a very quiet vehicle...what could possibly go wrong.

  • @iancarrington1967
    @iancarrington1967 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    I now live in Spain, the dumb electorate will no doubt vote in Starmer, the best of luck to you.

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So you're not British then.

    • @miniward9182
      @miniward9182 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Paul-yh8km Ian Carrington said he NOW lives in Spain as do some of my English friends.

    • @stevebaker9709
      @stevebaker9709 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We need it 😱😱😱

  • @jammybadger6514
    @jammybadger6514 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Maybe the fact that you can't hear them doesn't help.

    • @mikebreen2890
      @mikebreen2890 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Only if you are deaf.

    • @nigelheath7048
      @nigelheath7048 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@mikebreen2890
      Absolute nonsense. I was bumped into years ago by a lexus hybrid suv. I was carrying a delivery and as I stepped off the pavement having checked both ways the driver of the parked car simply pulled away without signalling or looking in front. Luckily it was low speed but still a hefty bump. Had that been a petrol or diesel I would have heard the engine.

    • @TheAnqueetas
      @TheAnqueetas 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Maybe look up from your mobile phone and be aware of your surroundings before attempting to cross the road.

    • @mikebreen2890
      @mikebreen2890 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nigelheath7048 Assuming the car was not a stop-start car and assuming that you would never cross in front of a stationary car that had it's engine running, right? Of course you would.

    • @robertjames4908
      @robertjames4908 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      And their increased mass so higher stopping distance , unless super-duper heavy brakes are employed...

  • @stephenholmes1036
    @stephenholmes1036 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    Im partially deaf these vehicles are deadly.

    • @Burz69
      @Burz69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Sorry I read that wrong I thought it said you were blind.

    • @WilliamYoung-in5pp
      @WilliamYoung-in5pp 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Try your eyes that might work

    • @stephenholmes1036
      @stephenholmes1036 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Typical ignorance of deafness

    • @mikebreen2890
      @mikebreen2890 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      If you are partially deaf you won't hear a petrol engine either, and from about 20mph tyre noise is louder than any engine.

    • @AlanRoberts-xy4wu
      @AlanRoberts-xy4wu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Pardon ?
      Open your eyes 😁

  • @cindyfaulkner5725
    @cindyfaulkner5725 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    I can't afford an electric vehicle and don't have anywhere to pit one to charge it

    • @Burz69
      @Burz69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thanks for sharing. 🙄

    • @antoniopalmero4063
      @antoniopalmero4063 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Work harder .

    • @JPNLVR-gt2qk
      @JPNLVR-gt2qk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ask the UN for aid like every other welfare victim

    • @batmanlives6456
      @batmanlives6456 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Golf clubs can use these silly toys ….
      Beyond that forget it

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's still early days with regard to pricing.
      But second hand EVs are cheap and new cars being introduced are as low as £15,000.

  • @colinleggett8686
    @colinleggett8686 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Don’t just just blame the cars … isn’t it the responsibility of the pedestrian to look before stepping out into the road..

    • @esecallum
      @esecallum 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      wef coxcusker

    • @cmg7960
      @cmg7960 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      what if said pedestrian was blind ?

    • @geoffersvoiceofreason2534
      @geoffersvoiceofreason2534 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@esecallumThanks for your intellectual and insightful contribution to the debate!

    • @stevejacobs9320
      @stevejacobs9320 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Was the case before laws brought in to give way to pedestrians when turning into a road.

  • @freewheelinfranklyn
    @freewheelinfranklyn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The official story about the fire at Luton Airport is that it was caused by a diesel land rover. It might seem unlikely but didn't the chief fire officer say so in his statement? Maybe he should be asked why the flames were coming from under the front passenger seat, which coincidently is where the battery is kept in the hybrid version. They claim the car was built the year before the hybrid version came out and that it was just diesel, so you see electric cars are safe and the pedestrians should get their ears syringed and look where they're going

    • @playasurf1000
      @playasurf1000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Watching the state of your government and its officials from afar, I wouldn't trust a single "official statement" they put out

  • @12alocin
    @12alocin 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    What about a man with a red flag walking in front of ev's!

    • @williamgould2855
      @williamgould2855 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      great idea .

    • @stevebaker9709
      @stevebaker9709 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's a good idea 👍👍👍👍

  • @vonlouie77
    @vonlouie77 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Copper thieves are a bit of a problem

    • @stevelane1956
      @stevelane1956 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Let`s hope so!

    • @Burz69
      @Burz69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Any thief is a problem. But what people pinching EV charge cables are realising is they are short cables with a huge rubber insulation. There's hardly any copper in them. They'd have more success stealing frying pans.

    • @vonlouie77
      @vonlouie77 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Burz69 do you think that’s going to stop them

    • @williams4434
      @williams4434 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Burz69 Get with the program, they're sabotaging the unjust agenda, not monetary gain, we're being pushed into dystopia or haven't you noticed yet

    • @williams4434
      @williams4434 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Get with the program, they're sabotaging the unjust agenda, not monetary gain, we're being pushed into dystopia or haven't you noticed yet

  • @stevelane1956
    @stevelane1956 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Once a large enough percentage of "early adapters" have experienced the enormous repair costs, the limited ability to have these cars serviced, traffic jams caused by people without money pushing their degrading batteries to the absolute limit, very high insurance premiums, cars bricking themselves for either no or nonsensical reasons...and unfortunately stories of entire families being incinerated while just going about their daily lives, the tide will turn hard AGAINST these things, big time.
    I'm not speculating here, these are all hard truths associated with the current technology being used in these cars.
    The people lying about the issues these cars have, and the ones keeping their heads in the sand, are the worst enemy the EV movement could possibly have. It's almost like a death cult is calling the shots for them.
    Recognizing limitations and slow, steady evolution is the way forward...not the clusterfuck currently playing out.
    Remove all the tax breaks, subsidy on cars, subsidy on charging, grants, company tax advantages, 0% finance and no one would ever buy one of these hideous turds!

    • @steverichmond7142
      @steverichmond7142 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      There are no repair costs.... I have had EVs for 8 years, and don't even need to check brakes. Would you rather sit in a bath of petrol ....

    • @east-saxon
      @east-saxon 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      On my third EV…massive upgrade on the fossils that you luddites drive. The EV revolution is happening and the old foggy technophobes cant do anything to stop it.

    • @steverichmond7142
      @steverichmond7142 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@east-saxon I've received 11 responses to my comments... and 4 of them contain the same words albeit in a slightly different order... I used to work at Stanlow oil refinery and Shell were disgusting - they had a PR department that was intent on just publishing lies.

    • @rjones6219
      @rjones6219 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@steverichmond7142 I wouldn't like to sit on top of an incinerator machine.

    • @rjones6219
      @rjones6219 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@east-saxonlook forward to seeing you with a rusting EV wreck on your driveway, because you couldn't find a buyer

  • @andyxox4168
    @andyxox4168 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    A colleague of mine was waiting between parked cars to cross a road (there were nose to tail cars all along the road) when the car he was behind suddenly and silently reversed breaking his leg. These vehicles should make noise and have reversing alarms.

    • @steverichmond7142
      @steverichmond7142 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      They do...

    • @andyxox4168
      @andyxox4168 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@steverichmond7142 well I’ve not observed such a feature nor heard it mentioned anywhere and having a colleague in hospital says it all.

    • @steverichmond7142
      @steverichmond7142 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@andyxox4168 All Teslas have a reversing sound...

    • @andyxox4168
      @andyxox4168 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@steverichmond7142 I didn’t realise a Tesla was representative of ALL electric vehicles!

    • @steverichmond7142
      @steverichmond7142 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@andyxox4168 Tesla is the best selling car in the UK and the world... Therefore it is representative.

  • @tubbytoboron1685
    @tubbytoboron1685 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Look at the state of Wales under a Liebour party. Imagine them in Westminster. Lid flems are just as bad.

    • @andrewjenkinson7052
      @andrewjenkinson7052 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Labour left the UK economy in a better state than any Tory government, except when they had to bail out the Tory controlled Banks.

  • @Dennis-xh2ec
    @Dennis-xh2ec 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Anyone who buys an EV needs to do research. Can't understand why anyone would buy one. The risk of fire/explosion would be the 1st thing to put me off let alone devaluatuon due to batteries getting old, charging time, and shear cost. Madness

  • @barriewilliams4526
    @barriewilliams4526 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    Lithium iron batteries burn at a temperature of around 2,500 degrees centigrade, and are extremely difficult to extinguish, often being left to burn out. Associated with this will be the massive amount of toxic fumes, and contamination. Just imagine the scenario when the clowns in charge have got their wish, and we are all driving around in battery powered cars. Will any unground car park, multi-story car park, ferry, cross Channel Tunnel etc be safe...... Sheer madness!😜

    • @steverichmond7142
      @steverichmond7142 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Few batteries now use lithium. Alll the serious fires in car parks have been from diesels.

    • @Burz69
      @Burz69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@steverichmond7142they do use lithium, but they are lithium ion phosphate. Much higher temperature tolerance and almost totally invulnerable to thermal runaway. EV fires is an urban myth.

    • @ftb2772
      @ftb2772 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sheer madness! Yes when stuff burns it pollutes our air! The air our children breathe! When will politicians wake up!

    • @davefitzpatrick4841
      @davefitzpatrick4841 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      AHH so you mean like the Luton airport car park fire,?..........oops that was a diesel Range rover or maybe the Liverpool car park fire? Oops another diesel Range rover 😂🤣
      Actually statistically fossil fuel cars are 20 times more likely to catch fire than a EV and strangely enough when a fossil fuel car fire catches fire they don't emit fragrances like Jasmine,🤔but toxic gases also .
      It's actually a fact that EVs are far safer and less likely to combust in the event of a collision ( I've seen plenty of fossil fuel cars on fire over the years) .

    • @tonyb3629
      @tonyb3629 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@steverichmond7142Sorry, not true. Vast majority use standard lithium ion. Sodium ion is used by some but it's inferior in most respects.

  • @RichardAylward-lu1pc
    @RichardAylward-lu1pc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    What a load of rubbish!!!!!

  • @RayTeggie-er7pb
    @RayTeggie-er7pb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    The minidisk of the motor world

    • @Burz69
      @Burz69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The air frier of the cooking world.

    • @MDM1992
      @MDM1992 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Burz69you can't fry anything in air.. it doesn't even make sense! 😂

    • @triplecogstudios3991
      @triplecogstudios3991 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I loved my minidisc player back in the day, had some fun with it for a while but eventually went back to cds.

    • @richardwilson5330
      @richardwilson5330 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wrong the minidisc was awesome and is still used today it was just super seeded by mp3 and home computers.👍

    • @RayTeggie-er7pb
      @RayTeggie-er7pb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@richardwilson5330 exactly

  • @GrantMC100
    @GrantMC100 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    And all the poor pigeons that I see squished. They too are fooled by these super quiet vehicles. remember the old STOP, LOOK and LISTEN ads. Something so simple but governments do nothing as usual.

    • @ruthcollins2841
      @ruthcollins2841 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is garbage.
      All road vehicles kill a lot of birds.
      The biggest killer of birds is pet cats, so I assume you are campaigning to have them eliminated.

  • @orchidhouse297
    @orchidhouse297 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I will keep my 2008 Peugeot 4007 diesel , 40 mpg, spacious, comfortable, reliable, and most of all - paid for. We do less that 2K miles per year. To replace it with EV big enough for a wheel chair and a mobility scooter would cost me £300 to £350 per month to be used locally twice a week. It is also very quiet in car parks because it runs on tick-over so I have to be aware that pedestrians will walk into my path because they have not heard the car sneaking up behind them. Changing to EV is not a viable option.

  • @user-cc5lq5hm6r
    @user-cc5lq5hm6r 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    You will not eliminate self driving cars as the UK government wants the control. They want to stop you having (& enjoying) the control to drive.

    • @Burz69
      @Burz69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Evidence?

    • @easyonenow
      @easyonenow 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Common sence.
      All SOS equiped cars have geo fencing and geo time built in now. Government wont be able to resist the controll available.

    • @Burz69
      @Burz69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @easyonenow cars have geofencing to collect data for self-driving AI amongst many more. Newer ICE cars have it too. If your new VW throws up a fault the car reports to VW and your nearest dealer to call you. It knows who you are, number, address, where you are and where you've been.
      Enjoy.

    • @PG-je2yj
      @PG-je2yj 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Burz69 Yep; read the privacy policy, many car manufacturers can even record your sexual preferences. (Though short of driving to a funny shop, I have no idea how!)

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I assume you are Russian given your non descript user name.

  • @Burz69
    @Burz69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Twice as likely?
    Hitting a pedestrian on a drive in an ICE car is very very unlikely.
    So that's very unlikely then?
    Maybe we should return to telling pedestrians to look where they're going.

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Take a look at the data they used.
      It's between 2013 and 2017, EVs only barely started around 2011.
      So hardly anyone would have had any knowledge or experience of them during the time period the data was analysed.

  • @MrJimWinter
    @MrJimWinter 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    People should not get rid of their combustion engines, any time soon :-). I wouldn’t get rid of your Bicycles either Just yet 😂

  • @JustTakeAMoment
    @JustTakeAMoment 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've driven for 46 years now and whilst advances in technology are welcome, the principle of getting from A to B still stands, regardless of how you plan your journey. I use a cycle when I can, a car for when I need to use a car. I don't care about the method of propulsion as long as it's reliable, that is what I really care about. I do so few miles every year, it's immaterial how the car is propelled.
    It doesn't matter were you stand on the environment, it's preservation of nature that matters most regarding all life, not just humans. In fact, we have a duty to perform because we ourselves have placed our own importance ahead of life forms that share this beautiful planet with us.
    We need to back off and become less of a threat to all life, be less worried about our own future and work to do less environmental damage to the Earth whilst trying to lift people out of poverty. A very tall order and no easy solution is readily available but try we must to find one by working together, not tearing each other apart.

  • @steve4296fred
    @steve4296fred 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Load of bollocks! Decent EVs have low speed sound systems - to warn pedestrians. Decent EVs have ultrasonic sensors, radar & cameras that automatically brake when a pedestrian or cyclist goes in front or behind them when reversing, A typical bullshit anti-EV story

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Take a look at the research. They used data between 2013 and 2017 when there were hardly any EVs on the road and the manufacturers were still learning as were pedestrians.

    • @john-k6k6w
      @john-k6k6w 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Paul-yh8km😷

    • @mikeolly67
      @mikeolly67 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Interesting, you mention decent EVs , I honestly didn’t realise decent EVs existed

  • @nockianlifter661
    @nockianlifter661 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What isn’t mentioned is the rapid acceleration of electric vehicles. Anyone can get one off the line like an F1 car, there’s no stalling, clutch slip, skidding of the tyres, they reach 30mph in a blink of an eye and both pedestrians and cyclists are particularly vulnerable if they are used to the generally slow starts of IC vehicles.

  • @jackiemelanson856
    @jackiemelanson856 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    Ban them

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ban cars.

  • @stevenmitchell7830
    @stevenmitchell7830 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    All EVs should be forced to play Jingle Bells whenever they move.

  • @Paul-yh8km
    @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The research is bullpoop.
    The data is from 2013 to 2017.
    Hardly any electric vehicles were around then, so:
    1/ the noise issue wasn't well known (lack of audio warning for pedestrians).
    2/ pedestrians were not aware of vehicles that could be quieter.
    2011 is effectively the start date for the first commercial electric vehicles.
    The idea that the study is recent is misleading because the data set is old.

  • @Vince_Paul
    @Vince_Paul 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Go to Antwerp in Belgium the port is full of 1,000’s of them because no one wants them.
    Ev’s are not the way forwards, we have them over 100 years ago and they didn’t sell then and they are not selling now.
    China had 21,000 Ev vehicle fires last year and now they are trying to sell them in the uk. They also use weak metal and are full of very poor workmanship. They lock the doors when in an accident so you cannot get out. They have major software issues.
    An if you complain in China they lock the ev remotely turning it into a brick.
    So many issues with Ev’s and most don’t even come close to british manufacturing standards. An they want you all to drive around in a death trap on wheels.

  • @larrym12
    @larrym12 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    wow what a news item in the 1980"s there a small number of EV's and a number of full page reports in the National newspapers that stated that the worst thing about EV's was that pedestrians and people on push bikes

  • @Simpson4756
    @Simpson4756 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Well, I'm no Einstein but years ago i thought. Electric cars+ people constantly wearing headphones, staring at their phones= whoopsie!

  • @miniward9182
    @miniward9182 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Was nothing learnt from the days our old Electric Milk Floats❓ Seems not. Short journeys but full charging back at company garages at night. No LONG journeys.

  • @michaelforster5106
    @michaelforster5106 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    What silly comments. Nothing wrong with electric vehicles at all. I have one and it’s superb.

    • @thisisnumber0
      @thisisnumber0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      For you. Not for many.

  • @Pumpkinhead77
    @Pumpkinhead77 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Maybe it's just that bad drivers are more likely to choose an electric car.

  • @davidspendlove5900
    @davidspendlove5900 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Pedestrians should take more care , not walk around in their own bubble.

  • @louisadigi8733
    @louisadigi8733 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've been saying all this for years, and with a lot of them catching fire I don't really feel safe in these electric vehicles

    • @Hitstirrer
      @Hitstirrer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why do you fear an EV fire? All the statistics agree that petrol and diesel cars catch fire at least 20 times more per million cars than EVs. Some studies say it's nearer to 40 times. You should be terrified at getting into a petrol car wit those stats. Add to that that the EV fire stats include skateboards, scooters and e-bikes. And we all know that those dodgy Chinese cheap scooters are a fire risk alone. An EV car fire is extremely rare actually.

  • @stevejacobs9320
    @stevejacobs9320 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Who in their right mind is going to buy a second hand EV knowing that 1: they are expensive to fix
    2: Not knowing how long before the batteries need replacement?
    You only have to look at second hand battery tools, they cant give them away!

  • @antoniopalmero4063
    @antoniopalmero4063 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Green cross code , STOP , LOOK , LISTEN . 0:45

    • @eileenemmins5875
      @eileenemmins5875 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You can’t listen because you can’t hear them

    • @antoniopalmero4063
      @antoniopalmero4063 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@eileenemmins5875 Stop LOOK Listen , if you look then you will see it . Who steps into the road without looking ?

    • @12alocin
      @12alocin 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      should be "Stop gazing at your phone and watch what you are doing"

    • @eileenemmins5875
      @eileenemmins5875 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@antoniopalmero4063 your right you will see it coming it will probably be on fire

  • @paulsmith982
    @paulsmith982 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    EV manufacturers should redirect their efforts to producing small, cheap, low range city runabouts. They'd still be rich men's toys but they'd get around some of the governments restrictions.

    • @marviwilson1853
      @marviwilson1853 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's coming - that is part of the EV development process.

    • @stephenlaw6331
      @stephenlaw6331 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Chinese manufacturers are already making them but thanks to US and European governments, they want to slap tariffs to make it unaffordable. Funny that a few years ago, EVs are the future and now that Chinese manufacturers are cornering the market, EVs are not the future now and we need a rethink 🤔

  • @antonoat
    @antonoat 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is all the extra electricity we'll need going to come from ???

  • @PoopyShaw-rf7nc
    @PoopyShaw-rf7nc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    There is no need for anybody to have an electric car unless they were free

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      EVs are a part of the solution to reduce energy consumption and to decarbonise energy.
      The alternative is no car.

    • @PoopyShaw-rf7nc
      @PoopyShaw-rf7nc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Paul-yh8km yep but it's no good if you can't hear them coming and you get run over that's why the old ones are better

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@PoopyShaw-rf7nc
      Modern EVs include artificial audio sounds that allow you to here them.
      Old EVs didn't have that, which is why the research this video is about is misleading.

  • @kennethausten
    @kennethausten 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Car is clean, that's what Matters. I run a diesel. I rely on it. Cannot afford a EV. Too costly. Ten years more of the diesel is my intention.

  • @JosephWood1941-iz6mi
    @JosephWood1941-iz6mi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    More data needed regarding location. However, a significant proportion of pedestrians have less than optimal hearing. I think that the theory that electric cars are quieter may be overstated because there will still be tyre noise.
    The present limited availability of battery capacity and charging stations possibly means that many battery powered vehicles will do most of their driving in urban environments whereas IC powered vehicles do a larger proportion out of town where there's less pedestrian traffic.

  • @user-rd1st9io8m
    @user-rd1st9io8m 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Probably a guaranteed fatality" What nonsense is this for an argument.

  • @jjolla6391
    @jjolla6391 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    while driving, "zero emissions" from an EV is also bollocks .. when you consider the extra tyre wear that comes from (i) being heavier, and (ii) having more torque. Tyre particulate emissions is made up of multiple toxic substances and is going to prove to be very deleterious to our health

  • @grahamhorne596
    @grahamhorne596 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where was the person on this program to give the counter argument to all this totally untrue and unfounded information

    • @marviwilson1853
      @marviwilson1853 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We are all here and making a bigger noise!

  • @KBHeal
    @KBHeal 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How about people start learning to look left and right again before bloody crossing the road??? 🤔🤔🤔

  • @nancykurtz7333
    @nancykurtz7333 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the country, people may add “whistlers” to their vehicle to warn the wildlife that may walk out onto the road…

  • @RushmoorFizzbomb
    @RushmoorFizzbomb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fact check. Fire at Luton Airport Car park was started by. Diesel car. Therefore you should ban diesel cars. Silly people.

  • @hughesy606
    @hughesy606 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don’t trust anyone that has wonky pictures prior to a broadcast!

  • @Baldy444
    @Baldy444 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Luton car park fire was started by a diesel car not an EV. GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT BEFORE MAKING SILLY CLAIMS

  • @kaybee5150
    @kaybee5150 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Electric vehicles. An answer to a problem that doesn't exist.

  • @scruffy4647
    @scruffy4647 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don’t get this noise issue with electric cars. Lots of ICE vehicles you cannot hear running. Battery technology has been with us for a while. At some point it’s going to be a game changer. Battery recycling is starting to become profitable. An electric motor is way more efficient than an ICE. You guys sound like Luddites.

  • @Cardifftoyboy1
    @Cardifftoyboy1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    How much is the fossil fuel industry paying you both for this load of twaddle!

    • @nigeltrueman6101
      @nigeltrueman6101 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      evs are too expensive, incredibly ugly(except the Tycan) and Souless

    • @Cardifftoyboy1
      @Cardifftoyboy1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nigeltrueman6101Strangely enough my exact words when I was asked about Kim Kardashian...

    • @nigeltrueman6101
      @nigeltrueman6101 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Cardifftoyboy1 can't argue. The barbarians aren't attractive either

  • @davetdowell
    @davetdowell 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Humans can never be 'net zero' we personally consume oxygen, and produce carbon dioxide.

  • @andyxox4168
    @andyxox4168 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Unfortunate you can’t necessarily choose what car you will be injured by!

  • @ftb2772
    @ftb2772 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    This is embarrassing…

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not really.
      The research is based on data between 2013 and 2017, when there were hardly any EVs on the road.
      It's just about a lie to say it is recent.

    • @ftb2772
      @ftb2772 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Paul-yh8km I don’t know why I comment on these things… the world has already passed these people by.

    • @stevejacobs9320
      @stevejacobs9320 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes all these Dud EVs will continue to to disapoint until a major disaster is caused by àn EV fire, probably on a ferry where many people die as a result.

  • @CPU-64
    @CPU-64 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I will fight to keep my combustion engine !!! I will never drive a time bomb 💣 battery EV !!!

    • @truebrit3670
      @truebrit3670 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great. More room on the road for me.

  • @kelvin170671
    @kelvin170671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BS number 1. The fire in the multistorey car park was not an EV, it was a diesel range rover..BS nunber 2.most of the new cars on the road are just as quiet at low speeds.all you can hear is the tyres on the road...just like a EV

  • @stevensimpson2625
    @stevensimpson2625 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Evs not the future ,iPad on wheels🤣

  • @colinpearce3249
    @colinpearce3249 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You started off with the statement that the Luton Airport fire was started by an electric vehicle. Get your facts correct. It was a diesel Range Rover, there is a photo available. Most of your statements are incorrect. Electric vehicles do not generate more carbon than combustion engined vehicles, where are you picking your ‘facts’ from?

  • @johnkeen4271
    @johnkeen4271 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The giant mobile phones on all new cars need to be banned too,,

  • @SlimTortoise
    @SlimTortoise 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Buy a old car and learn how to fix it My 22 year old Merc diesel does me Great, no DPF, no EGR, no CAT, a BS free zone and because I live in France No road tax and a two year MOT. 🙂

  • @alankemp1970
    @alankemp1970 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow your credibility goes low with this one especially after mentioning the Luton airport fire which was started by a faulty Land Rover diesel. Bedfordshire fire brigade and police force that dealt with this incident have a statement on their websites and have published reports clearly stating no electric vehicles were involved. The car park safety organisation and the insurance companies involved also have statements published. As for the rest of the information here it’s all very outdated and inaccurate especially the carbon payback from manufacturing. Just for reference I’ve been a petrol head modifying, turning and maintaining internal combustion engine cars, boats, bikes for 45 years and an electric head doing the same with electric drive for 15 years (including building batteries). None of this is correct here.

  • @stephennoe9494
    @stephennoe9494 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Same old, same old. On this news channell they churned out all the old clichés. All the comments about the electric cars have been answered over the past years. For instance, long before electric cars, petrol cars cought fire, they hit pedestrians. Battery manufacturers are changing and improving, batteries are being made lighter, and some cars are lighter than petro. Yes, China has cought the west with its pants down and is making the best if it. That is free trade. Yes, European car manufacturers should be worried, they are trying to catch up but not making a good job of it. Even this year with new electric cars coming from the likes of Citroen Opel/Vauxhall, etc. They are still not producing the cars the public want and can afford. When a TV programme puts out news on electric cars, they need to back up their claims with facts, mot old arguments that have been debunked.

  • @ram64man
    @ram64man 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Demand a referendum against 2030 shut off of combustion engines to 2100 , its not just cars but the cutoff for motorcycles is just nuts these is no real viable alternative, the cost slonnd is double range is over half

  • @MWS1960
    @MWS1960 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It must be England ? Greatest car I own outside of my Porsche 911. Very inexpensive to insure and American registration in $40 per year. No service and maintenance other than changing tires..no more service interval of $500 to $700 per year.

  • @leonwright3174
    @leonwright3174 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These people work for the fossil fuel industry, I can drive 210 miles for £13 in my EV absolutely love it. None for my money going too MR PUNTIN 😂

  • @marviwilson1853
    @marviwilson1853 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Surely it's pedestrians twice as likely to hit electric cars!

  • @Baldy444
    @Baldy444 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Used EV car prices have come right down 👍

  • @GaryMitchell-ez9rf
    @GaryMitchell-ez9rf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    No let’s get it right, electric cars are not twice as likely to hit pedestrians. Pedestrians not looking where they are going are twice as likely to walk in front of an electric car.

    • @Paul-yh8km
      @Paul-yh8km 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To be more accurate the research only applies between the years 2013 and 2017. They didn't use any recent data. Also EVs (1 or 2 models) only became available from 2011. There are now hundreds, depending on what country you live in.

  • @EcoFP33
    @EcoFP33 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Oh dear. Just that. Oh dear. Diesel landrover was luton airport.

    • @iancarrington1967
      @iancarrington1967 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      you believe that was a diesel fire ? Yellow flame jetting out from under the car is a classic lithium fire.
      The bbc initially said it was a hybrid but that didn’t suit the agenda so suddenly it’s a diesel .

    • @philiptidmarsh
      @philiptidmarsh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Actually it was proven , but not widely reported , that an electric car caused it and Range Rover was just a casualty of it

    • @nigeltrueman6101
      @nigeltrueman6101 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      it was a hybrid

    • @jamie-hb8gy
      @jamie-hb8gy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The video clearly shows a lithium battery venting off as it was a hybrid,the other video was uploaded to stop people blaming an ev but is actually fake and you if you look closely at the bottom of the vehicle and the ground you can see they didn't do the best job with the rendering of it,Andrew hopkinson of the fire service was pushed to fabricate the report from the higher ups.clearly you're covid jabs are working 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

    • @Richard482
      @Richard482 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@philiptidmarshSource?

  • @chrismaxny4066
    @chrismaxny4066 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BS! I own an EV with none of the garbage being put forth here. In no way does an internal combustion vehicle put less carbon into the atmosphere not in this universe! One thing you don't mention is the infrastructure required to maintain an ICE Vehicle. The drilling platforms, the refineries, the pipelines, the tankers, the trucks, and all the parts. All this puts carbon in the atmosphere including the energy required to build all this stuff. Not to mention the inevitable oil spills and the energy required to cleanup! Yes both EVs and ICE vehicles produce similar amounts of carbon to build but that's where it ends. I've a friend who owns a Model S Tesla with 145,000 miles on it that still drives like the day he bought it and yes there is slightly less mileage per charge. BTW I paid $29,395 (23,092.71 pounds) for my 23 VW Pro S AWD slightly used as it had 961 miles on it. Love the car and it is totally comfortable and quiet with no problems after 1800 miles. Just a heads up EVs make noise when driving under 25 mph. I do charge at home with a level 2 charger and have a solar system big enough to power the whole house and charge the car. Before you go on about the cost of solar, both my Geothermal Heating and Solar Systems will have paid for themselves in 6 more years!

    • @Mikere5
      @Mikere5 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Making your electric toy car consumes massive amount of resources and energy and the end of life for the batteries adds massive pollution, don't pretend the batteries are recycled, THEY AREN'T!

    • @chrismaxny4066
      @chrismaxny4066 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Repeating BS is still BS!

    • @Mikere5
      @Mikere5 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chrismaxny4066 Yes, you need to stop spreading the BS! Open your eyes and see the damage.

    • @chrismaxny4066
      @chrismaxny4066 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Mikere5 Your statement is testament to your ignorance concerning EVs!

  • @SimonR-uj1vi
    @SimonR-uj1vi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would love to know where they get this totally made up information. What next EVs all catch fire. Cradle to grave EV are more damaging for the planet. What a total load of utter S**T. And range anxiety and 2hrs charging at motorway services. Lol, 2 hours? How? Why? 18 minutes from 10 to 80% and when charging at home. It costs me less than £5 for over 300 miles. Also I have my fuel station at my home. Every time I go out I have 80% and 250 miles range. I leave at 7am I set it warm up and if a long trip set to charge to 100%. Also I'm not putting people into hospital and killing people, young and old with breathing difficulties. Also Na (Sodium) batteries on the horizon. No digging the planet for salt. One last thing 1000km range is available and prices are falling, also charging times for the Polestar 5 using the DOT battery. 5 to 10 minutes to recharge. Thousands of charge cycles and when the batteries do finally come to and end of their lives in an electric vehicle the battery packs will be used by the grid or home owners to store KW of energy. I pay 6p per kw between midnight and 6 am. Then I switch over to the car at 6am via vehicle to load. I then run my house when I'm home only paying 6p for every KW used. I only pay the 26p when I go out and unplug my car, then it is only to run the fridge and freezer. So yes they might be more expensive but prices are falling all the time and with options like 2 way power supplies. Theses are facts, not just totally made up!

  • @keithmarshall7084
    @keithmarshall7084 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I know 3 houses caught fire in my area charging then

  • @ron4274
    @ron4274 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1:00 According to the official report released Mar 21/24 (i.e., 2 months prior to this video post), the most probable cause of the Luton Airport carpark fire was an electrical fault or a component failure in a DIESEL vehicle that caught fire while in motion, which was confirmed by the vehicle Owner. Furthermore, the diesel vehicle in question had NO electric or hybrid propulsion system. I have seen no, more recent, reports that contradict those findings. If you are going to reference an event to support a story or an opinion, please fact-check the details so as not to perpetuate misinformation. (This comment is merely an opinion about the reporting, not the topic.)

    • @Bin-The-L-Plates
      @Bin-The-L-Plates 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How dare you let the facts get in the way of primary school journalism and garbage. Next these TV presenter jokers will be saying the earth is flat all because they've head a rumour somewhere on the Internet.

  • @likelikelikelikelikelike3971
    @likelikelikelikelikelike3971 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is all rubbish. Why be so against a faster cleaner solution? The fire stats are not right. This is the oil lobby talking. My EV insurance is level to a comparable petrol car. Maintenance is almost nil. And they have depreciated and new prices are falling fast. Showing that quadricycle and taking about ‘guaranteed fatality’ is also nonsense. SUVs weigh a lot too. Against those? Where is the balance in the argument here?

  • @paulnolan1352
    @paulnolan1352 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If the Taxpayers stopped subsidising this Con then it wouldn’t make financial sense to build Electric Vehicles. Combustion Engines with Synthetic Fuels will allow a bigger market for Sales to most buyers.

  • @TerenceCousins
    @TerenceCousins 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Shared a journey recently taking a friends electric car. My petrol nissan could have done the journey in 5 to 6 hours. It took 9!

  • @Hovercraftltd
    @Hovercraftltd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lots of cats are squashed by electric vehicles as they creep silently down driveways. Regular engine start up alerts them to scram...... sad .... meanwhile the wind farms kill the birds the cats would otherwise be hunting!

  • @ColinGarner-h1t
    @ColinGarner-h1t 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As much as I like you you are wrong that the vehicle catching fire at Luton airport was not electric .

  • @robtheplod
    @robtheplod 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    EV's... a product so great manufacturers are mandated to build them and we will be forced to buy them...

    • @nigeltrueman6101
      @nigeltrueman6101 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you arent forced to buy them. keep your current car well serviced

    • @thisisnumber0
      @thisisnumber0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@nigeltrueman6101Wake up

  • @maxflight777
    @maxflight777 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Howard Cox, “I drive a hybrid “
    Imagine my surprise 😂
    Hybrids are for utter idiots ! Imagine carrying an engine/gearbox and differential (oh a massive fuel tank too ) when you are running on battery power ! 🤦‍♂️😂 And of course imagine carrying a heavy Lithium battery and electric motor when you run on petrol power …. Stupidity beyond belief.

  • @johnnyrvf
    @johnnyrvf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Countries that want to watch everything. USA anyone?

  • @paulscott1759
    @paulscott1759 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a stupid headline and Luton fire was proven to be a hybrid Land rover also the reason people step out in the road is usually the person looking at their phones

  • @Whizzy-jx3qe
    @Whizzy-jx3qe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2035, the PM moved the goalposts

  • @69waveydavey
    @69waveydavey 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another thing with the chargers, why not just put your card in to pay? You have to mess about with an app on your phone etc, no signal, no charge. Petrol and diesel just pay there and then and even with, heaven forbid, cash. Is it another big brother watching you thing?

  • @andym1548
    @andym1548 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Always makes me chuckle all the uproar about EV Batteries losing power over time and being unreliable. Mine has an 8 year warranty which is at least same if not more than most ICE car power plants and if you dyno an ICE engine out of the show room then again after 8 years I guarantee you it will have lost about 15-20% of its power. Hilarious all the rubbish spouted on the web and the vast numbers of gulliable people out there..... EVs are not for everyone yet, fine no problem but to say they are dying is just ROFL.... stupid is as stupid does.

  • @MrTangolizard
    @MrTangolizard 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Maybe people should stay out the road

  • @briankavanagh7191
    @briankavanagh7191 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Those people need to learn the green cross code again.

  • @warrensmith4590
    @warrensmith4590 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Trolley buses used to be called silent killers
    Trolley buses also do not need many tonnes of Chinese batteries

    • @truebrit3670
      @truebrit3670 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Now the silent killer is air pollution.

    • @warrensmith4590
      @warrensmith4590 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@truebrit3670 utter toffee
      Google Statista air quality London vs Delhi 1750 to 2016
      Khan deliberately misused a report and claimed 4000 lives per year in London against the written advice of the report authors. Maybe khans lies have stuck in your memory more than the truth?

  • @davidbarrett1487
    @davidbarrett1487 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Petrol has never been better, reliable engines & clean apart from too much plastics, cheap than electric!

  • @RayTeggie-er7pb
    @RayTeggie-er7pb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    E.v,s accelerate very quick without any noise so catch pedestrians out crossing the roads , they look and see nothing then get hit

    • @steverichmond7142
      @steverichmond7142 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      EVs do make noise when accelerating.

    • @DavidSmith-fs5qj
      @DavidSmith-fs5qj 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They see nothing, really, do they have a cloaking device? What about the driver, they don’t drive themselves.

    • @ftb2772
      @ftb2772 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Pedel bikes too, totally silent. They pop up out of nowhere and take people out all the time!

    • @trevorenever265
      @trevorenever265 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolute rubbish. My car has anti-collision software. A car failed to give way at a roundabout and pulled out in front of me far quicker than any pedestrian could. In the time it took my car to stop my foot was still over the brake pedal. Reaction time is eliminated from the emergency stop.

  • @PeterKirton-nu9iv
    @PeterKirton-nu9iv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That comment about the weight of electric cars shows why electric Lorry’s will not work

  • @thomas05ish
    @thomas05ish 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    EVs are expensive to buy, impractical to use and not even good for the environment.

    • @thomas05ish
      @thomas05ish 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @jamiedodger1235 but they are still over complicated and weigh more than normal petrol/diesel cars.

    • @Burz69
      @Burz69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All things EVs aren't.
      But nice try.

    • @panzerfaust1
      @panzerfaust1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thomas05ish they don’t

    • @thomas05ish
      @thomas05ish 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@panzerfaust1 they don’t what?

  • @michaelledger98
    @michaelledger98 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Er the Luton Airport fire was caused by a diesel vehicle NOT an EV.This was not hard to fact check just google it.
    Obviously this article was a hit piece from the start trotting out old anti EV rhetoric that has been debunked many times.If you want to have a balanced debate get someone like Quinton Wilson on who can articulately present the positive sides to EV ownership.
    As far as the comment nobody wants an EV goes FYI the Tesla model Y is the best selling car in the world of any type .I have had 2 Teslas and currently drive a Hyundai Ioniq and no I do not suffer from range anxiety.
    Shame on your program for spouting your clearly biased opinions as facts.