Once a person becomes a Targeted Individual through V3K technology used in some Western countries and some Gulf countries, will it continue in other countries? For example a person who is a TI in UAE will also be a TI in Saudi Arabia? Does anyone know exactly
I find it astonishing that we as people still need to agree to all of these legal policies when consuming products. The companies should be agreeing to policies and we should just be able to consume the products without worrying about all of the terrible crap they could do with our private information.
I need privacy. Its essential and necessary for me to grow! How I became an exploited person is something I need to know, too! The average American can not withstand constant violations of privacy or not having boundaries meant to form some sort of privacy so they can feel psychologically safe! I can't take it.
It’s torture and terrorism. Keep talking about it. We need to grow allies that won’t gaslight and stand against gaslighting and this covert, extreme violence. Governments usher it in and deny it all, destroying all possibilities of Justice and healing.
Your brain recognizes patterns without being "corrected" to see or hear the patterns 'doctors' want them to see. Just put WMGK back on the radio and get your template out my mindgate. This way too oie in the sky and utopian. YES wrote 'We have Heaven' in about 1972vor something.
One thing I don't get is: can you make a simple example of an instance where MY ( my individual brain data) can be misused against me? One single example. Because I can't think of any.
@@angonuts7492 Your brain data, when combined with other personal information available online, could be used to create detailed psychological profiles without your knowledge or consent. These profiles could be used for various purposes, such as targeted manipulation, harassment, or even identity theft.
"If" AI could eventually track the electrical patterns of the brain, a person's specific pattern could show mild schizophrenia or mental issues that a person doesn't want anyone to know about. This information could keep a person from a job., or force then into treatment that is expensive and not needed. The examples at this point are endless.
You can watch an anime call Phycopass. The entire plot is about this tech on a futuristic setting, in which, based on your brain activity, you can even be arrested just because your brain activity says you are a phycopath, your carrear path will be determined also by it, etc
I don't really understand what's the deal of these speakers always initiating the speech with their pain and losses. I guess it attracts the listener's attention by stimulating their emotions such as compassion. It's an old trick for me and they need to improve their methods because for people like me even if what they're going to speak about in moments were extremely crucial, the moment I get the impression that they're trying to impose their ideas on me through such moderate andlow tactics I, then, consider it a fraud.
It's just basic rules about how to give a talk. You cannot talk divulgative for 12 minutes, people stop listening After 2. It's common now that people Need to tell stories if wanted to be listened. We, as humans, are not Just rational beings, we are also (and mostly) emotions.
This girl must be in competition for Aziz Yuval Harrari's bedroom. Her talking about how great it'll be allowing other people physical access to our brains then spending the last two minutes softly mentioning the right people have to have control over the tech sounds just like she plagiarized Harrari's speech on how human free will is a thing of the past and changed a few things
Despite the "cognitive liberty" label she likes to wear Nita is clearly enthusiastic about invasive brain scanning technology and she gets off (always wears a huge grin) on people's horrified reactions to having their privacy violated by employers, gov't, authorities.
@@lukemackinnon5894 Yes, I watched with shock Nita suggesting torture as a tool for our legal system and the indifference from the other panellists who's only response was "wow".
@@anthonywest8051 Yes exactly. As with so many other aspects of this kind of techno stuff - from 'Neuralink' BCI stuff to digital biometric ID, 'Smart' everything IOT to geoengineering and on and on - by the time we're seeing TED talks about something, its because they've been perfecting it for the last few decades and are getting ready to charge/tax you for the pleasure.
Programming is the new literacy as Douglas Rushkoff has pointed out, and we're really talking about both programming computers and understanding neuroscience. Aside from that people do not even appreciate cause and effect relationships, and are more concerned about censorship than sensors that can be this invasive. Both are important but it's just ironic when very unreasonable and illogical people are fixated on their free speech without any serious consideration of the 'read' side of it, so longest they can publish their rants online get some attention.
I am Targeted Individual of "Cognitive Warfare" since 1985. And voices from military operators keep on talking to me in the air around me whether I am in the wilderness or inside an airplane on top of the clouds. I have no more thoughts about privacy since even my dreams at sleep are being watched like movies. My eyes serve as cameras and my ears serve as microphone. I am an unconscious spy then in my surroundings or in any location I am with. Until this 2024 it is non-stop in operation in 24/7 basis. What Nina Farahany speaks here is an outmoded technology. It was from the 1975 US Patent of Robert Malech under the Dorne & Margoline Inc. And Hendricus G. Loos had produced the more advanced machine from 1993. Believe me, we no longer have privacy since 1980.
We are remotely being abused within the addresses we are supposed to live in by occupants in other addresses, pi$$ and $hit watched while those goofballs share that transmission with other goofs down the street. That is ABUSE....
A right to cognitive liberty would just add another paragraph to the terms of service. We waive our rights away all the time without paying attention, so what would make this any different?
I'm not hearing "social and ethical issues". I'm hearing her tell us she's going to cure us of our personalities with her brain tech. She spent the entire talk telling us how good it'll be to have other people manipulating our brain processing and then two minutes of "oh uh also selling our information and gotta have the right people handling it"
the spam comments are stupid af. we need cognitive liberty -- tokyo university had a kid hook up stability AI to a functional neuroimaging setup and they decoded human vision -- the AI was generating images of whatever the person saw, (not perfectly)
Thankfully, our bodies have a good at of adapting to its surroundings. I believe the brain is still vastly more powerful and will devise a way to keep thought private even from those mind reading machines
I’m currently a victim who’s being torchered via neurological implant device that’s been used on me without my consent! Please help me and stop people from doing illegally human experimenting and maliciously taking my every human right and freedom of thought from me! I’ll put my life on it it’s true!
Here I was all paranoid about tech reading my thoughts as I lusted over Nita's perfect face, then she takes a hard left turn into child death. Got me to sit up and listen. Good talk.
If it can be misused and abused, it will be - a tale as old as time.
It already is.... Why you think veterans are choosing suicide 25+ a month???
Once a person becomes a Targeted Individual through V3K technology used in some Western countries and some Gulf countries, will it continue in other countries?
For example a person who is a TI in UAE will also be a TI in Saudi Arabia?
Does anyone know exactly
I find it astonishing that we as people still need to agree to all of these legal policies when consuming products.
The companies should be agreeing to policies and we should just be able to consume the products without worrying about all of the terrible crap they could do with our private information.
Lol as if that’s what they want. They want to dominate you resourcefully and biblically.
@@MopeyFand
So well said. I Agree with you 100%.
I need privacy. Its essential and necessary for me to grow! How I became an exploited person is something I need to know, too! The average American can not withstand constant violations of privacy or not having boundaries meant to form some sort of privacy so they can feel psychologically safe! I can't take it.
It’s torture and terrorism. Keep talking about it. We need to grow allies that won’t gaslight and stand against gaslighting and this covert, extreme violence. Governments usher it in and deny it all, destroying all possibilities of Justice and healing.
Yeah. It's amazing how the very people who talk about honoring and observing boundaries are the ones who violate others' boundaries.
Your brain recognizes patterns without being "corrected" to see or hear the patterns 'doctors' want them to see. Just put WMGK back on the radio and get your template out my mindgate.
This way too oie in the sky and utopian. YES wrote 'We have Heaven' in about 1972vor something.
We need to work harder on privacy rights. Before the bad compromised data is stolen and misused.
One thing I don't get is: can you make a simple example of an instance where MY ( my individual brain data) can be misused against me?
One single example. Because I can't think of any.
@@angonuts7492 Your brain data, when combined with other personal information available online, could be used to create detailed psychological profiles without your knowledge or consent. These profiles could be used for various purposes, such as targeted manipulation, harassment, or even identity theft.
"If" AI could eventually track the electrical patterns of the brain, a person's specific pattern could show mild schizophrenia or mental issues that a person doesn't want anyone to know about. This information could keep a person from a job., or force then into treatment that is expensive and not needed. The examples at this point are endless.
The neighbors are remotely Abusing me right now and have been for a few years... Nobody want the abuse....
You can watch an anime call Phycopass. The entire plot is about this tech on a futuristic setting, in which, based on your brain activity, you can even be arrested just because your brain activity says you are a phycopath, your carrear path will be determined also by it, etc
Demanding mental privacy will itself get labelled as a mental disorder by the people who misuse such information.
You're right on this one. Great care must be in place before the data misuse, and "labeling" of people can happen.
Wtf no, no one is calling that a mental disorder, stop spreading bs
I just started a TH-cam channel for cash management and entrepreneurs , and I have so much ideas. Do you want to hear them
Absolutely true, while pros like her deny the tech exists as if that’s ethical, and legal to help with terrorism.
It’s the ultimate gaslight
I love that idea of civil liberty
Surveillance plus AI will end Freedom of Thought. Don't buy into the cheap art, or the hype.
I don't really understand what's the deal of these speakers always initiating the speech with their pain and losses. I guess it attracts the listener's attention by stimulating their emotions such as compassion. It's an old trick for me and they need to improve their methods because for people like me even if what they're going to speak about in moments were extremely crucial, the moment I get the impression that they're trying to impose their ideas on me through such moderate andlow tactics I, then, consider it a fraud.
It's just basic rules about how to give a talk. You cannot talk divulgative for 12 minutes, people stop listening After 2. It's common now that people Need to tell stories if wanted to be listened. We, as humans, are not Just rational beings, we are also (and mostly) emotions.
This girl must be in competition for Aziz Yuval Harrari's bedroom. Her talking about how great it'll be allowing other people physical access to our brains then spending the last two minutes softly mentioning the right people have to have control over the tech sounds just like she plagiarized Harrari's speech on how human free will is a thing of the past and changed a few things
I guess only Yuval should be informed and concerned
Despite the "cognitive liberty" label she likes to wear Nita is clearly enthusiastic about invasive brain scanning technology and she gets off (always wears a huge grin) on people's horrified reactions to having their privacy violated by employers, gov't, authorities.
Elsewhere she discusses "instil[ling] pain" and coercive techniques in the context of the legal or justice system, with glee on her face. Harrowing
Because she knows it’s already being used on some unknown people 🕉️⚛️☯️🧿🪬🧿
@@lukemackinnon5894 Yes, I watched with shock Nita suggesting torture as a tool for our legal system and the indifference from the other panellists who's only response was "wow".
@@anthonywest8051 Yes exactly. As with so many other aspects of this kind of techno stuff - from 'Neuralink' BCI stuff to digital biometric ID, 'Smart' everything IOT to geoengineering and on and on - by the time we're seeing TED talks about something, its because they've been perfecting it for the last few decades and are getting ready to charge/tax you for the pleasure.
I feel like leaving this all tech stuff and going back to ancestry tools. Maybe agricultural now. This world has gone too far to digest now.
neuralink?
Condolences for your daughter. We also lost a child, and it is not easy .... Life goes on, and God help us all in such moments
Programming is the new literacy as Douglas Rushkoff has pointed out, and we're really talking about both programming computers and understanding neuroscience. Aside from that people do not even appreciate cause and effect relationships, and are more concerned about censorship than sensors that can be this invasive. Both are important but it's just ironic when very unreasonable and illogical people are fixated on their free speech without any serious consideration of the 'read' side of it, so longest they can publish their rants online get some attention.
Deployed Worldwide Through My Deep Learning AI Research Library SilentWeaponsForQuietWars Thank You.
How did she get from "this tec saved my daughter's life" to "let's use this tec so employers can basically control their employees" she's mental
It didn't save her daughter's life...? Nor is she advocating for controlling employees. Maybe listen again but pay attention this time...
@@kattlaydee8160 I watched the entire video. Maybe you should do the same. Weirdo
@@jamescooke7243 lol. Then I'm sorry you have such poor comprehension. Everything's pretty clearly stated.
There's a recent World Science Festival video on the topic.
Reading and accessing people's private thoughts is rape since consent n doesn't exist
Nita will be remembered in history for her insights and warnings.
I needed the data for something but if I cannot have it then no one should.
I am Targeted Individual of "Cognitive Warfare" since 1985. And voices from military operators keep on talking to me in the air around me whether I am in the wilderness or inside an airplane on top of the clouds. I have no more thoughts about privacy since even my dreams at sleep are being watched like movies. My eyes serve as cameras and my ears serve as microphone. I am an unconscious spy then in my surroundings or in any location I am with. Until this 2024 it is non-stop in operation in 24/7 basis. What Nina Farahany speaks here is an outmoded technology. It was from the 1975 US Patent of Robert Malech under the Dorne & Margoline Inc. And Hendricus G. Loos had produced the more advanced machine from 1993. Believe me, we no longer have privacy since 1980.
Absolutely thought provoking!
This is really concerning
Great presentation Nita!
I just started a TH-cam channel for cash management and entrepreneurs , and I have so much ideas. Do you want to hear them
We are remotely being abused within the addresses we are supposed to live in by occupants in other addresses, pi$$ and $hit watched while those goofballs share that transmission with other goofs down the street. That is ABUSE....
A right to cognitive liberty would just add another paragraph to the terms of service. We waive our rights away all the time without paying attention, so what would make this any different?
Great job Nita!! I loved watching this live :):)
the social and ethical issues of human brain - surveillence 'cognitive liberty' very inspiring talk
I'm not hearing "social and ethical issues". I'm hearing her tell us she's going to cure us of our personalities with her brain tech. She spent the entire talk telling us how good it'll be to have other people manipulating our brain processing and then two minutes of "oh uh also selling our information and gotta have the right people handling it"
@@shadowpathfinder7723That’s what she said
the spam comments are stupid af. we need cognitive liberty -- tokyo university had a kid hook up stability AI to a functional neuroimaging setup and they decoded human vision -- the AI was generating images of whatever the person saw, (not perfectly)
Has 1984 arrived?
it's a combo of both 1984 and Brave New World
@@markc5960 Touché!
@@markc5960that’s exactly what I was going to say
Cells interlinked AAAAAAAAAAH
Thankfully, our bodies have a good at of adapting to its surroundings. I believe the brain is still vastly more powerful and will devise a way to keep thought private even from those mind reading machines
Mental Privacy.
Meta, Microsoft, and Apple..........and this is a good thing?
Please build more same shark humans.
That was great 👍
mungkin dlm ni comment attacker..Sbb system masa dlm youtube bukan bleh percaya pun..
I’m currently a victim who’s being torchered via neurological implant device that’s been used on me without my consent! Please help me and stop people from doing illegally human experimenting and maliciously taking my every human right and freedom of thought from me! I’ll put my life on it it’s true!
Someone has to be the experiment person. ❤ 🪬🧿🪬
Here I was all paranoid about tech reading my thoughts as I lusted over Nita's perfect face, then she takes a hard left turn into child death. Got me to sit up and listen. Good talk.
Congrats, she managed to manipulate you using cheap sentiments.
@@elessar5848 What can I say, I’m easy.
Cognitive liberty
eren yeager mati dalam masa 13 tahun????
Why should I listen to a lawyer about dangers of technology?
because it's about the laws surrounding it, dunce.
Because it's lawyers that then set rules for technology to be the most ethic possible
Nita is cool
Can you technology update my exhusband to think I hope my ex wife finds her a new husband now.
She has only theory. No proof.
🙏🏽❤️ wake up when your ready ok we are all waiting for you
There is no privacy.