This video basically shows that the XRD pattern for nanomaterials (size ~ 1 to 100 nm) AND amorphous materials are exactly *SAME* We can't differentiate between the two graphs , therefore, we need additional characterization techniques to confirm whether the materials are amorphous or Nano. In your case, the crystallite size is *extremely SMALL* 🤔 How is it possible??
Nice explanation thank you so much
I am happy you like it 😊
Please Arfa if you know anyone who expert on XPS and NEXAS and RPES and STM please let me know I feel struggling with my work.
@mashaelalotaibi8062 Okay, sure. I recommend asking questions on *researchgate * will definitely help you. There are many quality researchers on RG.
Hello brother...i.need your email or contect number please.
Sir I have tested polypyrrole which is amorphous in nature I got crystalline size of 0.03 nm is it ok
This video basically shows that the XRD pattern for nanomaterials (size ~ 1 to 100 nm) AND amorphous materials are exactly *SAME*
We can't differentiate between the two graphs , therefore, we need additional characterization techniques to confirm whether the materials are amorphous or Nano.
In your case, the crystallite size is *extremely SMALL*
🤔 How is it possible??
I am also asking same question
@@manashjyotidas3748 I don't understand your question?
How do you calculate the crystallite size?
I have used the scherrer formula and got 0.03 nm should I have to convert FWHM value to radian
@manashjyotidas3748 Yes, the 2theta must be in radian