True spiritual artistic experience. What a clear and enlightening vision by Harnoncourt. Powerful, tight, sharp, profound: electrifying. The listener melts into the sound, becoming part of it - totally amazing! Thanks for the upload
Mozart 39, 40, & 41 never fails to stir my heart. If you are not moved by these marvelous pieces, you have no soul. I meant that entirely as hyperbole, of course, but, to me, this is the pinnacle of classical music!
C'mon ! this is obviously the pinnacle of music at all, not only as classical music. You are not even convinced by your own words, this means you haven't really understand it. And to theses one should add the quatuor n°20 from Mozart. Here Harnoncourt has just directed the wrong composer. He entered this room believing he was directing Beethoven't 9th, and can't imagine he is directing something more joyful and delicate and profound. So that's why this is not Mozart. And Lorin Maazel's recording is fare better. Harnoncourt was better off directing military marsh music. Obviously Mozart turns into a total disaster with this markato rhythm.
@@laurenth7187 Firstly, I will wholeheartedly acknowledge that you are significantly more well versed in music theory than me as most of the terminology that you used and pieces that you referenced are entirely lost on me. Secondly, music is art, that is undeniable by even the most experienced of musicians. Yes, there is an amount of science used in its composition, just as there is an amount of science used in the composition of visual art, namely color theory, however the end product is wholly subjective. Comparing one product to another, especially across genres, is going to differ greatly from one person to the next. It would be like comparing Picasso to Rembrandt, or apples to oranges. Or, to use a more apt simile, bananas to grapefruits, or, in this case, classical to rock, jazz, or R&B. Most people would not be able to hold an educated defense of their opinion of one genre of art over another, let alone one set of pieces over the entirety of the art. They are too dissimilar; it's a frivolous debate. In conclusion, I completely respect your opinion of these pieces, let alone this specific performance of them, however I don't have the capacity nor the education to fully grasp that opinion, and, with that limited understanding in mind, I respectfully disagree. Thank you for sharing it with me.
@@laurenth7187 My thoughts exactly, it's either too slow or way too fast; they crawl through the allegros and sprint through the andantes. I'm listening to them ruin the magical andante in no. 41 as I type this. Neville Marriner and ASMF have the reference recordings of the late Mozart symphonies IMO. But I also loved the way Alfred Scholz did the andante in 41.
Unvergessliches Konzert in Berlin! (Die Trias als Trilogie erkannt und dargestellt, ein wahres "Testament" von Mozarts universalem Realismus und klassischer Kunst - aber auch von Harnoncourts Denken).
Why do people say Mozart is a non -serious composer ? The tension and release in the first movement alone is very profound. Also sometimes it sounds like music of the future like chromaticism in 2:50.
@@GiuseppeFochesato Mozart's last three symphonies were composed quickly over a two-month period in 1788, and they have often been regarded as a group, due in part to the circumstances of how they were discovered after Mozart's death, but also because of some unanswered questions. Were they intended to be published as a set, who were they written for, and were they even performed in Mozart's lifetime? Nikolaus Harnoncourt adds another level of complexity to the mystery by claiming that these symphonies were actually composed as one work, an "Instrumental Oratorium," comparable to the great choral oratorios that Mozart had studied at the time. The similarity of themes and motives, the perceived formal design of an introduction (K. 543), a middle section (K. 550), and a finale (K. 551), and the continuity of dramatic and expressive effects have convinced Harnoncourt that they are indeed unified in an original form that only Mozart could have conceived. Whatever one makes of this explanation, and whether it comes across in Harnoncourt's vivid performances with Concentus Musicus Wien, is necessarily left to each listener to decide. There is nothing in the performances that differs wildly from other period-style performances, and close study would be needed for many listeners to recognize the thematic connections. However, with the thought in mind that these symphonies could be a single entity, unlike anything else composed in the Classical era, listeners may easily accept Harnoncourt's theory as valid, if not merely thought-provoking. Beyond that, these are exciting performances that convey the music with explosive energy and vibrant colors, and they are highly recommended.~Allmusic.
Harnoncourt probt Mozart
th-cam.com/video/rj04OjTm_To/w-d-xo.html
True spiritual artistic experience. What a clear and enlightening vision by Harnoncourt. Powerful, tight, sharp, profound: electrifying. The listener melts into the sound, becoming part of it - totally amazing! Thanks for the upload
Harnoncourt and his orchestra are for me the ideal interpreters of these symphonies. What a profoundly musical experience this is !
Please limit ads to the gaps between movements. I know they finance it, but that doesn't entitle them to vandalise.
It is explosive! Why does Harnoncourt always have the best renditions of symphonies 39-41?!
Utterly unlike any other interpretation...and it is vastly superior! Harnoncourt is on fire here, and leads us to unexpected depths.
I"ve only listened to No.39 first movement so far, and I think it's wonderful. Both tender and powerful.
SO DANKBAR AUF SO VIELEN VERSCHIEDENEN HINSICHTEN
Wunderschöne Aufnahme!Danke dafür!
This is the best interpretation of Mozart symphonies I have heard.
increible. Gracias. Nunca te olvidaremos. Creo que el mismo Mozart te hubiera eternamente agradecido tu arte. A tus músicos también.
This is absolutely glorious, musically and visually.
Powerful and Amazing Mozart's Symphonien, His Music Gives Pleasure and Meaning to Our Lives here on Earth🎶💥✴️✨💖🎶✨
Mí Mozart ! Gracias..!
Mozart 39, 40, & 41 never fails to stir my heart. If you are not moved by these marvelous pieces, you have no soul.
I meant that entirely as hyperbole, of course, but, to me, this is the pinnacle of classical music!
C'mon ! this is obviously the pinnacle of music at all, not only as classical music. You are not even convinced by your own words, this means you haven't really understand it. And to theses one should add the quatuor n°20 from Mozart.
Here Harnoncourt has just directed the wrong composer. He entered this room believing he was directing Beethoven't 9th, and can't imagine he is directing something more joyful and delicate and profound. So that's why this is not Mozart. And Lorin Maazel's recording is fare better.
Harnoncourt was better off directing military marsh music. Obviously Mozart turns into a total disaster with this markato rhythm.
@@laurenth7187 Firstly, I will wholeheartedly acknowledge that you are significantly more well versed in music theory than me as most of the terminology that you used and pieces that you referenced are entirely lost on me.
Secondly, music is art, that is undeniable by even the most experienced of musicians. Yes, there is an amount of science used in its composition, just as there is an amount of science used in the composition of visual art, namely color theory, however the end product is wholly subjective. Comparing one product to another, especially across genres, is going to differ greatly from one person to the next. It would be like comparing Picasso to Rembrandt, or apples to oranges. Or, to use a more apt simile, bananas to grapefruits, or, in this case, classical to rock, jazz, or R&B. Most people would not be able to hold an educated defense of their opinion of one genre of art over another, let alone one set of pieces over the entirety of the art. They are too dissimilar; it's a frivolous debate.
In conclusion, I completely respect your opinion of these pieces, let alone this specific performance of them, however I don't have the capacity nor the education to fully grasp that opinion, and, with that limited understanding in mind, I respectfully disagree. Thank you for sharing it with me.
@@laurenth7187 My thoughts exactly, it's either too slow or way too fast; they crawl through the allegros and sprint through the andantes. I'm listening to them ruin the magical andante in no. 41 as I type this. Neville Marriner and ASMF have the reference recordings of the late Mozart symphonies IMO. But I also loved the way Alfred Scholz did the andante in 41.
Danke.
Cuánta belleza, se diría que Mozart no era terrenal.
Justamente esto pensé hace un rato cuando escuché la "Jupiter-Symphonie". Sonidos que llevan a uno a otro mundo.
No. 41
I. 1:07:46 to 1:21:03
II. 1:21:19 to 1:31:10
III. 1:31:30 to 1:37:13
IV. 1:37:16 to 1:48:55
Unvergessliches Konzert in Berlin! (Die Trias als Trilogie erkannt und
dargestellt, ein wahres "Testament" von Mozarts universalem Realismus
und klassischer Kunst - aber auch von Harnoncourts Denken).
Why do people say Mozart is a non -serious composer ? The tension and release in the first movement alone is very profound. Also sometimes it sounds like music of the future like chromaticism in 2:50.
Так ось який ти, Моцарт!…
Jupiter is explosive
Inutile, ha pochi rivali in questo repertorio... forse nessuno! Forse l'unico che ha capito davvero l'anima di Mozart
Instrumental Oratorio. Makes sense to me.
instrumental oratorio....?
@@GiuseppeFochesato Mozart's last three symphonies were composed quickly over a two-month period in 1788, and they have often been regarded as a group, due in part to the circumstances of how they were discovered after Mozart's death, but also because of some unanswered questions. Were they intended to be published as a set, who were they written for, and were they even performed in Mozart's lifetime? Nikolaus Harnoncourt adds another level of complexity to the mystery by claiming that these symphonies were actually composed as one work, an "Instrumental Oratorium," comparable to the great choral oratorios that Mozart had studied at the time. The similarity of themes and motives, the perceived formal design of an introduction (K. 543), a middle section (K. 550), and a finale (K. 551), and the continuity of dramatic and expressive effects have convinced Harnoncourt that they are indeed unified in an original form that only Mozart could have conceived. Whatever one makes of this explanation, and whether it comes across in Harnoncourt's vivid performances with Concentus Musicus Wien, is necessarily left to each listener to decide. There is nothing in the performances that differs wildly from other period-style performances, and close study would be needed for many listeners to recognize the thematic connections. However, with the thought in mind that these symphonies could be a single entity, unlike anything else composed in the Classical era, listeners may easily accept Harnoncourt's theory as valid, if not merely thought-provoking. Beyond that, these are exciting performances that convey the music with explosive energy and vibrant colors, and they are highly recommended.~Allmusic.
@@Hermes1548 Mozart's Ring cycle. 39 is introduction like Rheingold. 40 is Walkure's pathos and Siegfried's rhythm. 41 is Gotterdammerung's polyphony.
@@ilirllukaci5345 Das ist schön.
@@Hermes1548thanks.