Good Job. I like all of your caveats. It's tough to compare, serious target shooters who have been shooting Anschutz for years (over 40 years for me) will always go with Anschutz. What would I compare Anschutz to? Well I would compare it to a Feinwerkbau even the Winchester 52D would be useful for proper comparison.
Serious shooters will only choose one of those and, it won’t be the CZ. Cz as a cheaper plinker and short range hunter, sure( better than all or most US made rifles) but, the Anschutz is in another class. A Chevy and a Mercedes Benz will both get to to the supermarket and back but, you wouldn’t compare the two. Compare the CZ with a savage, Winchester, Remington or Ruger and you have a winner.
on another video a guy was saying the match barrels are made with extremely tight chambers, so bullets sometimes don't want to extract if casing is not perfect it recommends only match ammo in the barrel.
I shot sporter class with a 1710 anchutz bull barrel. I stayed in the high 240ties. I even shot a perfect 250 once. I also had a C.Z American and any given day it might out shoot my 1710. It was extremely accurate for what it was but it couldn't beat my 1710 very often.
The bbl profile at the receiver is much better on the CZ 452. I'd put my 452 FS against the 64 series Anschutz any day. For an average shooter my 1710 DKL shoots marginally better than the 452 FS. I'd also rather shoot the FS over my 64 series Anschutz. Bought my 64 Annie 50 years ago.
I have these two rifles and love them both. As far as which is the he best deal it wholly depends what you are going to use it for. They are both very accurate however the MPR64 IS A BENCH RIFLE. THE ANSCHUTZ 64 MPR is one of the finest most accurate .22’s ever made, however it is not a hunting rifle and is 10lbs.5oz with the Weaver T-36 scope ie(try carrying this for even one hr.)🥴 Anschutz and CZ have both stopped offering either of these rifles 🙄 That is how old this video is🤣
Anschutz 64 has the cheaper action that’s why I only have the superior 54 Anschutz action. I’ve owned both Anschutz actions, 54 & 64 action, and the 54 action is better quality and more accurate in my experience.
Yup Cz makes a awesome gun My 455 luxe in Turkish walnut is a thing of beauty. Shit I used to have a Remington 581 that would outshoot a lot of high end 22,s.
Not that the CZ is a bad rifle but, the Anschutz is the better rifle. Anschutz 1710 provides 50 metre groups, inside of 1/2 inch all day long. No CZ has made it to the Olympics. There
I own a CZ 457 and Annie 1761 MPR, with all respect, as you noted, your shooting ability did not do the Annie justice. You can’t compare these 2, the 1761 is vastly superior
yes yes anschütz is suuuuuper overrated, i would say just give them away for free to me, so you dont get your hands dirty on those dirty anschütz :D :D *irony off* there is a reason why anschütz is the most used .22 in europe for competition shooting and biathlon etc.
Well if someone can's shoot straight, it does not really matter. for shooting crows around the house, I would go for the cheap CZ. no need for cleaning after every time it is used and you can put it in a corner of the barn for when you need it.
Your rest setup and shooting style dont allow for an accurate judge of precision shooting thusly almost any solid bolt actioin rimfire rifle you shoot will give you the same results even a cheap mossberg plinkster cooey unless the triggerpull is horrendous.
if money is a concern and you are not into serious competition, stick with the cheaper rifle. For serious, really serious shooters, an Anschutz, a Feinwerkbau or a Walther is is a better choice. I shoot two "Annies" a 15 lbs. M1913 single shot and a Sporter M1914D repeater that is very light at about 6.5 lbs.(both weighed without a scope).
![ว้าว!ลุงบีมแบกทองมารับขวัญหลานกันยกบ้าน [cc] แดนแพทตี้ SS2 | EP.49 |](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Osihq1OAs-4/mqdefault.jpg)
![[TH] VALORANT Champions Seoul - Grand Final - EDG vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/WvObMc9VelI/mqdefault.jpg)
They have other Anchutz with shorter barrels. The Anschutz is way more accurate for sure.
Good Job. I like all of your caveats. It's tough to compare, serious target shooters who have been shooting Anschutz for years (over 40 years for me) will always go with Anschutz. What would I compare Anschutz to? Well I would compare it to a Feinwerkbau even the Winchester 52D would be useful for proper comparison.
I personally think that a Tikka T1x and the CZ would be a better comparison. However, great job on the review. Nice range too!!!
Buy a 1710 Anschutz sporter and never look back.
Serious shooters will only choose one of those and, it won’t be the CZ.
Cz as a cheaper plinker and short range hunter, sure( better than all or most US made rifles) but, the Anschutz is in another class.
A Chevy and a Mercedes Benz will both get to to the supermarket and back but, you wouldn’t compare the two.
Compare the CZ with a savage, Winchester, Remington or Ruger and you have a winner.
on another video a guy was saying the match barrels are made with extremely tight chambers, so bullets sometimes don't want to extract if casing is not perfect it recommends only match ammo in the barrel.
I shot sporter class with a 1710 anchutz bull barrel. I stayed in the high 240ties. I even shot a perfect 250 once. I also had a C.Z American and any given day it might out shoot my 1710. It was extremely accurate for what it was but it couldn't beat my 1710 very often.
More click bait, than a serious comparison. I guess it got us here, so success!
The bbl profile at the receiver is much better on the CZ 452. I'd put my 452 FS against the 64 series Anschutz any day. For an average shooter my 1710 DKL shoots marginally better than the 452 FS. I'd also rather shoot the FS over my 64 series Anschutz. Bought my 64 Annie 50 years ago.
I have these two rifles and love them both. As far as which is the he best deal it wholly depends what you are going to use it for. They are both very accurate however the MPR64 IS A BENCH RIFLE. THE ANSCHUTZ 64 MPR is one of the finest most accurate .22’s ever made, however it is not a hunting rifle and is 10lbs.5oz with the Weaver T-36 scope ie(try carrying this for even one hr.)🥴 Anschutz and CZ have both stopped offering either of these rifles 🙄 That is how old this video is🤣
I don’t believe the performance is the same. I have an Annie MPR and the holes all touch.
Anschutz 64 has the cheaper action that’s why I only have the superior 54 Anschutz action. I’ve owned both Anschutz actions, 54 & 64 action, and the 54 action is better quality and more accurate in my experience.
My Anschutz 54 MPR has ejection issues as well.
Hello!
Could you tell me which adapter you used to attach the bipod to the Anschutz Rifle?
I was wondering the same
I have a CZ455 and is worthless. I purchase an anschutz 9161 and Cz455 did not come closed.
Yup
Cz makes a awesome gun
My 455 luxe in Turkish walnut is a thing of beauty. Shit I used to have a Remington 581 that would outshoot a lot of high end 22,s.
I had a 41 Remington that was the best rifle I ever owned but the latter Remington was junk.
Beagleman
Not that the CZ is a bad rifle but, the Anschutz is the better rifle. Anschutz 1710 provides 50 metre groups, inside of 1/2 inch all day long.
No CZ has made it to the Olympics.
There
Good video , you know Anshutz 520 ?
I hate that CZ now sprays the flame onto the stocks.
I own a CZ 457 and Annie 1761 MPR, with all respect, as you noted, your shooting ability did not do the Annie justice. You can’t compare these 2, the 1761 is vastly superior
What do you recommend more for hunting? The 1761 or the CZ 457?
We love English here down under 🍻
This is like the zl1 Camero will outrun a Ferrari, true but I'd rather have a Ferrari
yes yes anschütz is suuuuuper overrated, i would say just give them away for free to me, so you dont get your hands dirty on those dirty anschütz :D :D *irony off*
there is a reason why anschütz is the most used .22 in europe for competition shooting and biathlon etc.
Get the Anschutz 54 action. My 1710 is more accurate than my 1416 64-action.
For the money it ought to be heads above the best but not so. I personally believe that the cz is the best and probably more accurate.
Beagleman
Well if someone can's shoot straight, it does not really matter. for shooting crows around the house, I would go for the cheap CZ. no need for cleaning after every time it is used and you can put it in a corner of the barn for when you need it.
Good brother 😊
The 64 is a cheaper lesser beast to the 54 so why buy it when you can get a 54 for the same money?
Is the CZ 457 or the 1761 better for hunting? Opinions?
Привет, можно ли на CZ455 22lr установить, Ствол Anschutz кал. 22 WMR (для модели 1761). Подойдет ли етот ствол на cz455, система крепления похожая.
Your rest setup and shooting style dont allow for an accurate judge of precision shooting thusly almost any solid bolt actioin rimfire rifle you shoot will give you the same results even a cheap mossberg plinkster cooey unless the triggerpull is horrendous.
lol ,,, no point in wasting money on a nice rifle ,,, with shooting like that .
have you thought about a shotgun . lol
[ match 54 owner ]
You need to get your head higher on the bench
cz455 is a junk, I got one and is worthless.
Completely irrelevant comparison, may as well compare a car to a boat.
if money is a concern and you are not into serious competition, stick with the cheaper rifle. For serious, really serious shooters, an Anschutz, a Feinwerkbau or a Walther is is a better choice. I shoot two "Annies" a 15 lbs. M1913 single shot and a Sporter M1914D repeater that is very light at about 6.5 lbs.(both weighed without a scope).