This is similar to the way I play and it usually nets a daily profit! No Pass line unless shooting on a cruise or in Vegas for a walk up daily bank roll of $1000. $220 inside, one hit for $70 and then $66 inside then collect and press until across, reset after point hit to $66 inside if the roll is longer than 12 rolls. If PSO happens 3 times in a row.... I walk for a bit and have a meal. LOL. BTW saw you at Planet Hollywood last month playing Stadium craps after the Craps for a Cure weekend. I will probably see you on an RCCL cruise someday as much as I get comped. Although MSC is a close second now....
This is how i am playing. 3 variations. 220 down to 66 220 down 110 or 220 drop the 5/9 to 25, then drop to 110 on second hit.. Depending on how aggressive i want to get and how early i am in the session. if the his is on the first roll, more aggressive, if it takes a couple rolls for the first hit go straight to the 66
I also use this strategy. Basically like a Dallas draw down. 220 inside for 1 hit. Then to 110 for 1 hit and drop to 44 inside and press to the moon. So with 2 hits i pocket 60 bucks and I got action still on the table. Yes it's alot to gamble up front but I don't work the come out, so it's only the PSO I gotta sweat. And if I can get the one hit then I reduce my risk on the next roll to only 40bucks. It Works!
10 shooters is absurd to be prepared for imo , you'd be demoralized for starters and so far in the red . I say play a regression , get your money back quickly and then do what you want . I'd imagine the house makes a fortune from player greed of everyone losing and pressing even there place bets . Yeah sure a long roll helps and everyone always dreams of them , we've had them i get it . But losing your place bets unless your well ahead is crazy . I know it's hard time to come to down a table minimum or watch winning numbers go by with nothing in them , but there's no shame in securing your money first as apposed to pressing or putting more out there than the maybe 6 rolls you may hit Idk even what the average number of rolls a shooter throws
Me and my brother do a similar strategy just a bigger scale when we're shooting (controlled shooting) we do 550 inside press 160 across on first hit. Reduce to 330 inside after second hit. For random shooters we do a smaller 220 inside and little different takes 3 hits
my default play is 120 inside (30/30/30/30) working on the comeout. My goal is to hit the inside for either $35 or $42, which gives me $10 for the 4, $10 for the 10, and either $15 or $22 for odds behind the come bet. Then a second hit that allows me to take the remaining three-box-numbers-inside down to three, or two, units. Your work works for me.
Been playing craps for over 35 years and the killer of any light side strategy is the point seven out. One point seven stings, two hurts, three put a fork in it you're done. Even at one point 7 you are down 150. Which means you have to hit 1 number next shooter. Then, roughly 10 hits ( $14 per hit unless its a 4 and 10) to recover from the one point seven. It all sounds good in theory, but the dice are unforgiving at times. I would not recommend doing this even if you can afford it.
@@slloyd9892 agreed. A horrific strategy to be sure. He was playing the game wrong before and still playing the game wrong. The whole "this many chances to hit vs 6 ways to hit a seven" is severely flawed. Each number is a dog vs that 7. Each one individually is a dog, it matters not that you have all those bets out, in fact it's worse to do that. If his logic worked the field would be a great bet and it's not! 2.77% against you in the field at best and at its worst it's 5.55% against you. Strategy all wrong, math all wrong. It's all just bad.
So your exposure is $154 for the 1 hit. The better way imo to play is 66 inside, after 1st hit throw in a $1 and press the inside numbers up $22. 1 more inside hit and bring it all back down to $44 inside. You win $21 on first hit and $28 on second hit so still the same $49. Max outlay is $67. Much easier to make up $66/$67 then $154. Especially when you are pressing from the $10 level. Too much risk out there for little reward because the loss would be so hard to make up from the $44 level. So a good in between is the Route 66.
@@holyrollr 1 hit and regress is a tough one. You’re actually better with 1 hit and off completely. You get hit on the $154. Now next shooter you may only win 15-30 bucks unless there is a long roll. Tough to come Back from. However if you did a 1 hit and down, you basically made it back in 3 shooters ($147 of the $154). You could morph from the 1 hit into some sort of a hybrid play. Take the 1 hit and do $49 on the DC and then $44 on the 4 other numbers. That way if a quick 7 comes you won over $50
I think going for two hits is better and then regressing. If the table is stone cold and shooters cannot do average rolls, going for two hits will bankrupt me faster than one hit. Two hits will have higher variability. Gambling for one or two hits and then regression seems to be the best short game. Two hits because you need more than the 44 inside to play with. I need to recoup a fraction of the $154 inside during each shooter due to outs before a hit. Plus making one hit is actually more than one roll, mathematically. 40% (12/36 of the 30/36 or 12/30) of the non-seven rolls are non-inside numbers. 60% of the non-seven rolls are inside hits. I need 1.66 rolls per hit statistically. I need to recoup money equal to what you lose going out before getting a hit or $154 inside divided by the chance of going out. Going for one hit: I need average 1.66 rolls, survival rate of (5/6)^1.333 = 78.4%. I will not make one hit 21.6% of the time before going out or average $154 * 21.6% = $33.27 average loss. After one hit (1.66 rolls) and regression to $44 inside, I still need $28.27 or two hits to cover the outs before hit hands. So a total of three hits or five rolls. Going for two hits: I need average 3.33 rolls, survival rate of (5/6)^3.33 = 54.5%. I will not make two hits 45.5% of the time or $154 * 45.5% = $70.14. Of that 45.5% of the time, there is a 90% ( 1 - (1/2) ^ 3.3333) chance to make one hit or +$49. Total $70.14 - ($49 * 90% * 45.5%) = $20.06, resulting in average loss of $20.20. After two hits (3.33 rolls) and regression to $44, actually ahead ($49 * 2 - $44 - $20.06 = $33.94). Two hits or 3.33 rolls and out.
the way i play is i regress the sister number.. on a $10 table, i bet $66 inside.. if 5/9 hits, i regress 5/9 to $10 each, pocket $1.. if 6/8 hits, i regress to $12 each, only down $3.. then i collect and press.. a couple of PSO's will ruin your day tho.. good luck out there..
Why not ust walk by a roulette table ....throw , $1000 on red or black.......then just go and play my regular 6/8 strategy that's worked since cavemen invented the game?
@@JamesIsbrandt-ck4fi do you have any questions or suggestions on how I can improve? This IS for more advanced players but my hope is that people would watch until the end to understand the point of the video.
![holy roll[r] - Casino Craps & Cruising Comps](http://yt3.ggpht.com/YMzMB_ZEzp3Gok2LDzGpi7Kr8to84tkEqgAS6C6nq_6T__qr0RPDyfuo9s5MtYiz2NwrMOPFfA=s48-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj)
![CRAPS STRATEGY :: The holy roll[r] Drawdown!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/J8A5-yIb_AA/mqdefault.jpg)
![CRAPS STRATEGY :: The holy roll[r] Drawdown!](/img/tr.png)
This is similar to the way I play and it usually nets a daily profit! No Pass line unless shooting on a cruise or in Vegas for a walk up daily bank roll of $1000. $220 inside, one hit for $70 and then $66 inside then collect and press until across, reset after point hit to $66 inside if the roll is longer than 12 rolls. If PSO happens 3 times in a row.... I walk for a bit and have a meal. LOL. BTW saw you at Planet Hollywood last month playing Stadium craps after the Craps for a Cure weekend. I will probably see you on an RCCL cruise someday as much as I get comped. Although MSC is a close second now....
This is how i am playing. 3 variations. 220 down to 66 220 down 110 or 220 drop the 5/9 to 25, then drop to 110 on second hit.. Depending on how aggressive i want to get and how early i am in the session. if the his is on the first roll, more aggressive, if it takes a couple rolls for the first hit go straight to the 66
I also use this strategy. Basically like a Dallas draw down. 220 inside for 1 hit. Then to 110 for 1 hit and drop to 44 inside and press to the moon. So with 2 hits i pocket 60 bucks and I got action still on the table. Yes it's alot to gamble up front but I don't work the come out, so it's only the PSO I gotta sweat. And if I can get the one hit then I reduce my risk on the next roll to only 40bucks. It Works!
10 shooters is absurd to be prepared for imo , you'd be demoralized for starters and so far in the red .
I say play a regression , get your money back quickly and then do what you want .
I'd imagine the house makes a fortune from player greed of everyone losing and pressing even there place bets .
Yeah sure a long roll helps and everyone always dreams of them , we've had them i get it .
But losing your place bets unless your well ahead is crazy .
I know it's hard time to come to down a table minimum or watch winning numbers go by with nothing in them , but there's no shame in securing your money first as apposed to pressing or putting more out there than the maybe 6 rolls you may hit
Idk even what the average number of rolls a shooter throws
I like 220 reduce then 160 and your in the hand cheap after that , and then let my place bets pay for hardways .
@@trampy1 🎲🎲🤑✅
Me and my brother do a similar strategy just a bigger scale when we're shooting (controlled shooting) we do 550 inside press 160 across on first hit. Reduce to 330 inside after second hit. For random shooters we do a smaller 220 inside and little different takes 3 hits
@@asmoday8382 wow 🤑
my default play is 120 inside (30/30/30/30) working on the comeout. My goal is to hit the inside for either $35 or $42, which gives me $10 for the 4, $10 for the 10, and either $15 or $22 for odds behind the come bet. Then a second hit that allows me to take the remaining three-box-numbers-inside down to three, or two, units. Your work works for me.
@@JeffinND nice 🎲🎲✅
Been playing craps for over 35 years and the killer of any light side strategy is the point seven out. One point seven stings, two hurts, three put a fork in it you're done.
Even at one point 7 you are down 150. Which means you have to hit 1 number next shooter. Then, roughly 10 hits ( $14 per hit unless its a 4 and 10) to recover from the one point seven. It all sounds good in theory, but the dice are unforgiving at times. I would not recommend doing this even if you can afford it.
@@slloyd9892 yeah…the idea of getting enough hits at craps means you just have to get lucky I guess 😊🤷♂️
@@slloyd9892 agreed. A horrific strategy to be sure. He was playing the game wrong before and still playing the game wrong. The whole "this many chances to hit vs 6 ways to hit a seven" is severely flawed. Each number is a dog vs that 7. Each one individually is a dog, it matters not that you have all those bets out, in fact it's worse to do that. If his logic worked the field would be a great bet and it's not! 2.77% against you in the field at best and at its worst it's 5.55% against you. Strategy all wrong, math all wrong. It's all just bad.
So your exposure is $154 for the 1 hit. The better way imo to play is 66 inside, after 1st hit throw in a $1 and press the inside numbers up $22. 1 more inside hit and bring it all back down to $44 inside. You win $21 on first hit and $28 on second hit so still the same $49. Max outlay is $67. Much easier to make up $66/$67 then $154. Especially when you are pressing from the $10 level. Too much risk out there for little reward because the loss would be so hard to make up from the $44 level. So a good in between is the Route 66.
@@iptvclub1575 I’m trying to show a one hit strategy. $66 inside and down to $44 takes two hits. How would you do a one hit and down? 🤷♂️😁🎲🎲
@@holyrollr 1 hit and regress is a tough one. You’re actually better with 1 hit and off completely. You get hit on the $154. Now next shooter you may only win 15-30 bucks unless there is a long roll. Tough to come
Back from. However if you did a 1 hit and down, you basically made it back in 3 shooters ($147 of the $154). You could morph from the 1 hit into some sort of a hybrid play. Take the 1 hit and do $49 on the DC and then $44 on the 4 other numbers. That way if a quick 7 comes you won over $50
I think going for two hits is better and then regressing. If the table is stone cold and shooters cannot do average rolls, going for two hits will bankrupt me faster than one hit. Two hits will have higher variability. Gambling for one or two hits and then regression seems to be the best short game.
Two hits because you need more than the 44 inside to play with. I need to recoup a fraction of the $154 inside during each shooter due to outs before a hit. Plus making one hit is actually more than one roll, mathematically. 40% (12/36 of the 30/36 or 12/30) of the non-seven rolls are non-inside numbers. 60% of the non-seven rolls are inside hits. I need 1.66 rolls per hit statistically. I need to recoup money equal to what you lose going out before getting a hit or $154 inside divided by the chance of going out.
Going for one hit: I need average 1.66 rolls, survival rate of (5/6)^1.333 = 78.4%. I will not make one hit 21.6% of the time before going out or average $154 * 21.6% = $33.27 average loss. After one hit (1.66 rolls) and regression to $44 inside, I still need $28.27 or two hits to cover the outs before hit hands. So a total of three hits or five rolls.
Going for two hits: I need average 3.33 rolls, survival rate of (5/6)^3.33 = 54.5%. I will not make two hits 45.5% of the time or $154 * 45.5% = $70.14. Of that 45.5% of the time, there is a 90% ( 1 - (1/2) ^ 3.3333) chance to make one hit or +$49. Total $70.14 - ($49 * 90% * 45.5%) = $20.06, resulting in average loss of $20.20. After two hits (3.33 rolls) and regression to $44, actually ahead ($49 * 2 - $44 - $20.06 = $33.94). Two hits or 3.33 rolls and out.
@@CowTownCraps very interesting 😁
I’m gonna have to try this ✅🎲🎲
I have never heard more flawed logic and bad math presented in such a continual and repetative manner.
@@chucklandry73 🤣😂 thanks for the encouragement
the way i play is i regress the sister number.. on a $10 table, i bet $66 inside.. if 5/9 hits, i regress 5/9 to $10 each, pocket $1.. if 6/8 hits, i regress to $12 each, only down $3.. then i collect and press.. a couple of PSO's will ruin your day tho.. good luck out there..
A little hint to craps, bet what's winning and lay what's not! Always have money on the 7 ! Period
If you’re betting $64 across and you want a lot of action, you can’t beat Funnel Craps on the Boardwalk with no crust
@@andrewd9633 😂🤣😍✅🎲🎲
Why not ust walk by a roulette table ....throw , $1000 on red or black.......then just go and play my regular 6/8 strategy that's worked since cavemen invented the game?
Your explanation is VERY confusing !!!!!!!
@@JamesIsbrandt-ck4fi do you have any questions or suggestions on how I can improve? This IS for more advanced players but my hope is that people would watch until the end to understand the point of the video.