I really like this, and I absolutely love that you write and share the notes you play, but I must ask why you don't develope your sheets more? I mean, there are so much more to be written; mood, tempo changes (acc / rit...), staccato dots, ties, bows, phrasings and much more. Is it maybe to save some time, laziness or because you want people to interpret each piece in their own way?
drag0nfis7 Well, this isn't one of my arrangements, so I'm not really to blame here^^. But since I do this with my own arrangements too, I might as well answer here: It's a mix of all the reasons you listed. It really is. In my earlier sheets I often had more dynamic signs (things like staccato dots and arpeggio lines I still put in), but I realized that it does take time to add these, because I want to think properly about them before I add them, and I also realized that a lot of people follow what's written very closely, and don't play pieces their own way because it conflicts with the signs in the score, which I don't like at all. In most pieces I still have a general outline for dynamics, but those should be seen as suggestions too, not hard rules. ...And I can't really deny lazyness can I?^^
DrJekyll MrHeil Sorry for the late response. I guess I can relate to that laziness (I oftentimes also just write the most basic stuff when writing music), and I think you do manage to play your pieces with enough emotion for a musician to know what should have been written there anyway. Keep up the good work! :)
drag0nfis7 I wrote the sheets so I should respond. It's because of two core assumptions. #1 - People generally look for sheets for music they already know. #2 - Most people can decipher the elements you're asking about, but few have perfect pitch. So I prioritize work according to need.
![東方 [Piano] Lullaby of Deserted Hell 『4』](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/T75iD_KlUlA/mqdefault.jpg)
I think this tempo is slightly too fast but I love the song!
I really like this, and I absolutely love that you write and share the notes you play, but I must ask why you don't develope your sheets more? I mean, there are so much more to be written; mood, tempo changes (acc / rit...), staccato dots, ties, bows, phrasings and much more.
Is it maybe to save some time, laziness or because you want people to interpret each piece in their own way?
drag0nfis7 Well, this isn't one of my arrangements, so I'm not really to blame here^^.
But since I do this with my own arrangements too, I might as well answer here:
It's a mix of all the reasons you listed. It really is.
In my earlier sheets I often had more dynamic signs (things like staccato dots and arpeggio lines I still put in), but I realized that it does take time to add these, because I want to think properly about them before I add them,
and I also realized that a lot of people follow what's written very closely, and don't play pieces their own way because it conflicts with the signs in the score, which I don't like at all.
In most pieces I still have a general outline for dynamics, but those should be seen as suggestions too, not hard rules.
...And I can't really deny lazyness can I?^^
DrJekyll MrHeil Sorry for the late response. I guess I can relate to that laziness (I oftentimes also just write the most basic stuff when writing music), and I think you do manage to play your pieces with enough emotion for a musician to know what should have been written there anyway.
Keep up the good work! :)
drag0nfis7 I wrote the sheets so I should respond. It's because of two core assumptions. #1 - People generally look for sheets for music they already know. #2 - Most people can decipher the elements you're asking about, but few have perfect pitch. So I prioritize work according to need.