Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, book 2 - Ethics and Moral Theory
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ค. 2024
- Check out the Aristotle on the Moral Virtues class (starting April 13) - reasonio.teachable.com/p/aris...
Request personal videos on Cameo - www.cameo.com/gregorybsadler
Get Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics - amzn.to/2g9t0UU
Support my work here - / sadler
Philosophy tutorials - reasonio.wordpress.com/tutori...
Take classes with me - reasonio.teachable.com/
If you'd like to support my work producing videos like this, become a Patreon supporter! Here's the link to find out more - including the rewards I offer backers: / sadler
You can also make a direct contribution to help fund my ongoing educational projects, by clicking here: www.paypal.me/ReasonIO
If you're interested in philosophy tutorial sessions with me - especially on Aristotle's thought and works - click here: reasonio.wordpress.com/tutori...
You can find the copy of the text I am using for this sequence on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics here - amzn.to/2x1HS25
My videos are used by students, lifelong learners, other professors, and professionals to learn more about topics, texts, and thinkers in philosophy, religious studies, literature, social-political theory, critical thinking, and communications. These include college and university classes, British A-levels preparation, and Indian civil service (IAS) examination preparation
#philosophy #Aristotle #ethics
(Amazon links are associate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases)
Yes, that's a common enough meaning of it -- in that case, you could say that Aristotle does think there are "moral facts" (though you'll not find that term in his works), in that there are real conditions, distinctions, etc. in moral matters which we can talk about/know/reason about rightly or wrongly
Hello Dr. Sadler, thank you very much again for making these very informative videos, and putting them out on TH-cam, so that other philosophy students can have a sense of an idea of what we are reading. I start class on 01/19/2016, and I can say that these videos are really helping me grasp the meaning of this class, and as well preparing me for what lies ahead.
Thanks, cheers.
+Alex Wise Glad that they're given you a good foundation. Realize though, that your instructor may have a very different take on the same text. . . .
+Gregory B. Sadler Yes, I will take that into consideration, thank you for your reply.
@@GregoryBSadler Your take is better reasoned and significantly more coherent
In a word, no, not necessarily.
A vice is not simply a bad action. It is a habitual, established pattern of behavior, attitude, and emotion/desire.
I am so proud of you for turning them all against utilitarianism.
Hahaha! I don't know that's the case.
Thank You Dr. Sadler for posting these videos. I find your teaching style very interesting and easy to understand. Wish I had seen your videos earlier, as this is my finals week. Anyways, Thanks a bunch!
you're very welcome -- this guy, Aristotle, is one of my absolute favorite philosophers
Glad you like them. Yes, I think that virtue ethics is not only more flexible, but also more encompassing than other moral theories
So, there's a number of different but related reasons why virtues are right and good which Aristotle brings up. Perhaps one that's the best to start with is that they are traits that we both need to flourish and what flourishing -- doing well -- looks like, concretely.
Thank you for posting this.
Great lecture. You've gained a new subscriber.
I love these! Thanks for the upload!
You're welcome!
Thanks for the reply. I enjoyed the video
Thanks for these Aristotle videos, I'm really enjoying them. I like the way you link the virtues, to practical examples. It seems this kind of virtue ethics is a bit more practical and flexible than some of the other theories I've read.
Though I'm struggling to a bit to understand, what makes the virtues right or good in some greater sense, rather than just optimal for performance? Perhaps I have missed it or it comes later.
You're very welcome
Thanks!
Great thanks again.
Well if they really are unjust laws -- not just what feel or appear to us unjust laws -- they are going to deform the person, and likely lead them into vices, rather than virtues.
There is, on the other hand, something to be said for developing the disposition of law-abidingness, one of the forms of justice for Aristotle -- but again, if the laws are really unjust, a just person is likely to end up sensing something to be amiss.
Good question to think about, actually
in my current classes, about 20-21
man, youre a great teacher!
gan Orwell glad you enjoy the lectures
Yes it seems these terms can include a very wide range of positions and arguments. It can be confusing as I'm not a professional philosopher and haven't looked into ethics for that long, though I find it fascinating. I took moral realism to mean that there are moral claims that refer to moral facts and these can be right or wrong.
Hhaha! Well, there's always next semester. I'm glad you like the videos!
Thank you for the Videos. I have found them very useful in my pursuit in getting my degree in philosophy! Question for you though, am I am able to maybe get your opinion on certain topics?
Yep -- take a look at the playlists in the channel
I suppose. I'm never really sure what to make of the "-isms" (e.g. realism, externalism, etc.) that get bandied about by (mainly Analytically-trained) philosophers.
Generally, I have to ask what the -ism they have in mind is, since odds are the term has had multiple meanings in the course of philosophy's history
I think that it is -- once some work has been done to "bridge the gap", so to speak.
Who's the "you" you're addressing in your comment?
Thanks, that makes sense yes. Do you believe that virtue ethics is or can be grounded in some form of moral realism then?
Do you believed we're sort of placed into virtous dispostions by laws we know to be unjust that exist?
Well, not really necessary. I'd have addressed the comment, but it was unclear who you were addressing
So by being compliant to a law that you know to be unjust would be
I also miss being a student
A vice, would it not?
Do virtuous acts have to be due to an act of will? If someone does something to avoid legal penalty, even though they wanted to do something else, does that make them virtuous?
One of the qualifications of an act either coming from or in accordance with virtue is that it is done for the right reason, so just avoiding legal penalties, no, that doesn't yet constitute virtue.
As for will, Aristotle doesn't have a conception of "the will"
Thanks for the clarification. I am enjoying your lectures.
what is the argument in the second book? who makes the argument?
Sounds like you're looking for tutoring. I do that through Google Helpouts. Here's the link: helpouts.google.com/115610514266074572098
Thank you
Thank you firstly for making these videos available on TH-cam. In regards to virtue and vice, the excess, mean and deficit scale, does Aristotle have an objective grounds for mean? It seems without a standard of mean it will just very from person to person based on there own subjectivity, ergo in effect virtue and vice as described is just illusory. It seems to not really matter where you fall on this scale so long as you're happy personally.
Here's where it would be great for you to read the text, since the answers to what you're asking about are in there.
Thank you Prof. Sadler for your reply.