@vincent Ng armoured vehicles are useless in the jungles. Considering that the likely opponents that Singapore would be facing, both Malaysia and Indonesia, has >50% of their land being jungles, Singapore's superior numbers in both armoured vehicles and jets would literally not matter(just look at US and Vietnam). Sure Singapore would be incredibly formidable in urban environments like Johor but other than that, it's likely that Singapore would not survive a war against Malaysia and Indonesia. You just can't compare mere conscripts with 2 years of training and terrible morale to a professional and voluntary soldier.
@@ookelim8932 Remember what the British thought about tanks being usless in Malayan Jungles? And how the Japanese made use of tanks in Malaya? Does the 2 and 2 connect with each other? And Singapore's pre emptive strike doctrine is to annihilate the enemy's heavy weaponary before sweeping in with their mechanized and motorized units, which means that the enemy would only be left with unsupported infantry on the battlefield. Which is also why the SAF have been training in combined arms warfare for decades. While Malaysia is still trying to figure out the word "Combined".
Its designed to be a AFV (armoured fighting Vehicle) its not meant to be a "tank" or a MBT (Main Battle Tank). Thats what we have the leopard tank for. this is meant for facing other AFVs or infantry units, it can take down mechanised infantry without a problem. 30mm AP rounds can pierce most armour and HE rounds can definitely take down infantry.
I may be wrong. I get the impression we are geared towards a strike capability. This is good. Looking at Ukraine from Russian point, there lacked a ground sweep and a Co ordinated ground hold movement net capability. In battle, there is a need to hold ground in a mobile context, securing, denying enemies that space, as well as to eliminate all residue threats in a moving net grid order.
all hunters are to tag commanders = interlock, report all movements and notify in-advance = all commanders are to report to pasir-labar camp. same for naval autonomous and drone autonomous hunt mode, hold fire
500 chinese miles plus 500 chinese miles movement of trade sumatra is 4 sections west-malaysia is 4 sections and 2 halves, eventually map mirror-reflect sumatra java and sulawesi(2 halves) oppressive spiritual feel oppressive feng-shui feel oppressive stress of unable to keep up with the han-chinese types this is how things will be sorted and trade routes maintained. all will select and earn their own place. mistakes during meeting and after move out are permitted (plus minus skip - one movement, progressive-regressive)
when cannot stand feeling-emotions and need to leave = feel free to take weaponry = outside are circus = your ending are your policies area to occupy divided headcount - area - weaponery-needed = logical assessment of contrived-strategies
Why the F the barrel bumping up and down like that while moving? Battlefield ready? Meh. I don't think so. And how about communications jamming? Poor design. Could be better.
@@charlesd3a Temasek holding acquired 25% stake of Timoney technology during 2018 , so its partly own by Singapore and ST engineering for your information. Terrax was designed by Timoney Technology but was fully bought over by ST engineering, its now solely owned by Singapore and turkey’s current APC was made under licensing from ST engineering.
This thing looks like a very well over built highly advanced M113. I want one
This look like a kurganets version
It just looks like a better bradley
This is why i like SG,Singaporean here
Nice. Does it have Wi-Fi?
the most important part right?
@@胖胖两父子 oh hey I found my family's account
If you can't win with numbers, win with tech. Nice.
@vincent Ng armoured vehicles are useless in the jungles. Considering that the likely opponents that Singapore would be facing, both Malaysia and Indonesia, has >50% of their land being jungles, Singapore's superior numbers in both armoured vehicles and jets would literally not matter(just look at US and Vietnam). Sure Singapore would be incredibly formidable in urban environments like Johor but other than that, it's likely that Singapore would not survive a war against Malaysia and Indonesia. You just can't compare mere conscripts with 2 years of training and terrible morale to a professional and voluntary soldier.
@@ookelim8932 Remember what the British thought about tanks being usless in Malayan Jungles? And how the Japanese made use of tanks in Malaya? Does the 2 and 2 connect with each other?
And Singapore's pre emptive strike doctrine is to annihilate the enemy's heavy weaponary before sweeping in with their mechanized and motorized units, which means that the enemy would only be left with unsupported infantry on the battlefield. Which is also why the SAF have been training in combined arms warfare for decades. While Malaysia is still trying to figure out the word "Combined".
Much of what Singapore has today was helped along by Timoney Technology of Ireland designed vehicles.
Question, does it have an ied deflecting hull?
I like tanks and Im proud Singapore has an advanced armoured vehicle. Its surprising it has anti-tank ammunition for a 30mm cannon. Well done SAF 👍
Consideration is based on the region's military development. 30mm should be good enough.
Its designed to be a AFV (armoured fighting Vehicle) its not meant to be a "tank" or a MBT (Main Battle Tank). Thats what we have the leopard tank for. this is meant for facing other AFVs or infantry units, it can take down mechanised infantry without a problem. 30mm AP rounds can pierce most armour and HE rounds can definitely take down infantry.
The 30mm is still good enough it used the same ammunition as the GAU 8 avenger in the A10 it also has APFSDS
30mm is used for general infantry support. The Hunter has 2x Spike ATGM in a hidden roof launcher for antitank work.
Do a documentary like the terrex almost 10 yrs ago.
Any information on the armour protection
I may be wrong. I get the impression we are geared towards a strike capability. This is good.
Looking at Ukraine from Russian point, there lacked a ground sweep and a Co ordinated ground hold movement net capability.
In battle, there is a need to hold ground in a mobile context, securing, denying enemies that space, as well as to eliminate all residue threats in a moving net grid order.
So Your the new addition to the brother hood of nod..ah i am seth just seth.. Thats a nice lite tank you God there nod.
The only thing is, does it have Amphibious ?
all hunters are to tag commanders
= interlock, report all movements and notify in-advance
= all commanders are to report to pasir-labar camp.
same for naval autonomous
and drone autonomous
hunt mode, hold fire
singapore self-incriminate
= phrosprous used against biological batu-caves and Forest-City of johor
500 chinese miles plus 500 chinese miles
movement of trade
sumatra is 4 sections
west-malaysia is 4 sections and 2 halves, eventually map mirror-reflect sumatra
java and sulawesi(2 halves)
oppressive spiritual feel
oppressive feng-shui feel
oppressive stress of unable to keep up with the han-chinese types
this is how things will be sorted and trade routes maintained.
all will select and earn their own place. mistakes during meeting and after move out are permitted (plus minus skip - one movement, progressive-regressive)
when cannot stand feeling-emotions and need to leave
= feel free to take weaponry
= outside are circus
= your ending are your policies
area to occupy divided
headcount - area - weaponery-needed = logical assessment of contrived-strategies
Slap a Trophy system and you will be good to go
Wah! E horn somemore
E-Horn is standard in all SG AFVs. Even the older Bronco and Bionix platforms have it.
Why the F the barrel bumping up and down like that while moving?
Battlefield ready? Meh. I don't think so.
And how about communications jamming?
Poor design. Could be better.
Interesting that Singapore can design, develop and build their own AFVs, but Australia cant.
Much of the vehicles built in Singapore are actually of Irish built under license.
Same said for the Aussie Bushmaster vehicles are built under licensing agreement from Timoney.
@@charlesd3a Temasek holding acquired 25% stake of Timoney technology during 2018 , so its partly own by Singapore and ST engineering for your information.
Terrax was designed by Timoney Technology but was fully bought over by ST engineering, its now solely owned by Singapore and turkey’s current APC was made under licensing from ST engineering.
Can the philippines buy some?
@A Perpetual Guardsman with a flashlight despite the desire to buy unfortunately the Pinots have no money to buy
It looks like a modern Maus tank
Fully controlled by electronics, so what's the countermeasure for an emp attack?
Military electronics are usally EMP hardened. That's why they're so much heavier, bulkier and more expensive than civillian electronics.
Almost all military tech is designed with EMP hardening in mind.
Time to send 20 Hunters to Ukraine or Russia to test out the capabilities of what advance features etc
Quite a fake angmoh accent but very proud to see our country's new weapon
How should they sound, in your opinion?
Emp is good vs computers 🤣
E horn me likey
*FFS BUY THE SWEDISH CV90 SERIES INSTEAD!*
test out in ukraine
Bullshit on tracks, bmp-2 is still the Best 🧡🐺
So if BMP-2 is the best why does even Russia replace it?
Lol... this thing it's their versión of the kurganets
this comment aged well lmao
You aren't living in 1980 anymore